damzy88:
Thanks.

I have checked and the nearest on the NOC is Statistical Officer. I worked in the Budgeting Unit during my Nysc.Do you think I should make it Statistical or Budget Officer?

Again,how many duties is appropriate?

Thanks

GlitteringStar:



Elfmann said you should send him a PM. Was banned by antispam bot.

Elfmannisback:
I really look forward to the final quit day! Antispambot is one of the signs.

Elfmannisback:

Just got released. I believe she saw my msg from the romance section.

wenks:
Fraud ke.. That guy is the most jovial forensic Nigerian police i have ever encountered with eye for money.. Lol... Enjoyed his he attended to me and my family.

Elfmannisback:

Just got released. I believe she saw my msg from the romance section.

GlitteringStar:



Lol. Don't put dot ooo. I only used the dot as an example. You will fill in the gaps.

smslive2:
What are you doing in romance section??

smslive2:
Elfmann has been banned again. I hope he changes his moniker to ElfmannCanadianAntiBOT lol...

mcstan18:


I wouldn't know except you share the detailed JD. The NOC and JD has to have at the minimum three-quarters similitude to be on the safe side. At this juncture, you alone can determine this

smslive2:
What are you doing in romance section??

Newmum0615:
What causes a moniker to get caught up in it? I don't want to be affected mbok.

Newmum0615:
As in ehn. I don't even know how the idea came about. The guy just like everyone and every institution is adjusting to the Canada business. Man must wack abeg.

joo2018:
"16(1)(c):information the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the enforcement of any law of Canada or a province or the conduct of lawful investigations, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, any such information. Relating to the existence or nature of a particular investigation, that would reveal the identity of a confidential source of information, or that was obtained or prepared in the course of an investigation;"

"Some info can be hidden or omitted from your notes as it is according to their act that some info is exempted from release under access of information act 16(1)(c) or 15(1) or 19(1) etc.. So whenever you get CAIPS / GCMS email or letter first check if they have talked about any act like 15(1) or 16(1)(c) etc and if it is so then it is for sure that some info can be omitted or hidden from your notes and you can observe a whitener be placed on some parts of notes."
Check more:
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/vital-information-about-caips-gcms-notes.109332/
http://www.oic-ci.gc.ca/eng/inv_inv-gui-ati_gui-inv-ati_section_16.aspx

mcstan18:


My guy has become a regular prey to NL antispam bot. "Elfmannisbackinstyle" loading this time

mcstan18:


I wouldn't know except you share the detailed JD. The NOC and JD has to have at the minimum three-quarters similitude to be on the safe side. At this juncture, you alone can determine this

Bello321:


Thanks a lot joo2018. Do u know if the S.16(1)(C) could be an issue.

Tojued:


[s]They're contradicting themselves by themselves. They should stop this rough play o.[/s]

From all indications right now sha it's a compulsory biometric something for all of us

GlitteringStar:



Elfmann said you should send him a PM. Was banned by antispam bot.

melarose:
The man I spoke with at the ICAN office said Wes is meant to send two emails to them but they only got one. The one they got included the body of my transcript and my ATS exam certificate. The other mail which Wes refused to send is supposed to contain my membership certificate and that is why this problem occurred. Honestly, this doesn’t add up neither does it make sense, please was this how ur verification came too?

Zeiya:

Please which one is antispam bot?

Newmum0615:
What causes a moniker to get caught up in it? I don't want to be affected mbok.

purplerain:
Okay. Thanks

danianne:
Plz help!!!
I got a mail from ICAN office that they couldn't verify my documents to Wes because the mail they sent to Wes returned with the error message the server is full. Please has anybody experienced this before? What can I do?

ysteph:
I noticed the issue of biometrics have been discussed a couple of times here. Just wondering, is there an issue with giving biometrics?

Jennypharb1:


Hi, please I'm also interested if you find a contact. Thanks

joo2018:
I don't think so. You already said you were cleared for eligibility. It only means they don't want to reveal their source of information or basis of analysis.

ysteph:
I noticed the issue of biometrics have been discussed a couple of times here. Just wondering, is there an issue with giving biometrics?