Smh

The bunch of inept buffoons called lawyers in this country.

I doubt they can even win a simple DUI case abroad.

Ihedioha and his legal team was just complacent, foolish and unserious. You see that kind of storm coming and you entered it unprepared??

He was busy breaking statues while someone was breaking his rule of power.

I withdraw my pity for the man, he deserved to be kicked out!

NGpatriot:



Different case

Different sets of facts

= Different judgment.

What did they appeal then, if it’s difference case, they ought to start from the high court if the fact of their case is different from the one filed at the tribunal

After reading through the reasons for the judgment, almost everybody (lawyers and laymen) will agree that if anything went wrong, it went wrong with INEC’s failure to proactively disprove the 388 polling unit results rendered by Governor Hope Uzodinma. In point of fact, INEC tendered nothing to contradict the results tendered by Uzodimma.

The second thing that went wrong was that Ihedioha’s lawyers simply alleged that the results were forged but they never tendered any evidence to prove their bare assertions. Pray, how can you accuse someone of a criminal offense (forgery) without proving it beyond reasonable doubt. They didn’t even present anything at all. Nothing!

Further, while Governor Uzodinma made credible assertions that elections were held in those 388 polling units just as they were also held in the rest of the remaining polling units across Imo State, neither INEC nor Ihedioha’s lawyers could contradict that or explain what happened to the votes scored in those 388 polling units.

In any system of elections, there is a presumption that elections held in all polling units. Therefore, anybody who asserts that they did not must the one proving such, not the other around. It is thus proper that this presumption, being unchallenged, had to be resolved in favor of Uzodinma.[b][/b][color=#006600][/color]


I don't know if IPOB retarded brainwashed monkeys can comprehend this simple analysis. May be I should spell it out for them in IGBO and hire an Igbo language expert to come and drill it into their empty skulls.

NORSYK:


When Tanko disbanded the panel of Imo State case on 3 occasions what does that tell you

Is this the reason why INEC, the defendant, and his lawyers refused to produce credible evidence before the supreme court?

Is NGPatriot also Racoon?

we don hear

The so called foolishness of God is wiser than the highest wisdom of man.

When God spoke through his prophet,who are the lawyers to change it.

Confusion catch dem on d spot

After reading through the reasons for the judgment, almost everybody (lawyers and laymen) will agree that if anything went wrong, it went wrong with INEC’s failure to proactively disprove the 388 polling unit results rendered by Governor Hope Uzodinma. In point of fact, INEC tendered nothing to contradict the results tendered by Uzodimma.e resolved in favor of Uzodinma.

How INEC removed the former governor from office.

NGpatriot:



Different case

Different sets of facts

= Different judgment.

Oh, I never knew the supreme court takes direct cases without it passing through the lower courts.
When will the court rule on the real case since this is a different one?

Are we still on this?

NGpatriot:



Is this the reason why INEC, the defendant, and his lawyers refused to produce credible evidence before the supreme court?

Lol Tanko knew that Uzodinma's case was dead on arrival and he had to disband the panel and did what they had instructed him to do.

Concerning the evidence... Ihedioha and INEC showed enough evidences to prove that those results are unreliable.

HOPE UZODINMA's Police Witness also contracted Hope Uzodinma's evidences and that ought to kill the case, but not with Tanko led Supreme Court who evidence have shown that they have script to pull the Democracy down!

[s]

NORSYK:


Lol Tanko knew that Uzodinma's case was dead on arrival and he had to disband the panel and did what they had instructed him to do.

Concerning the evidence... Ihedioha and INEC showed enough evidences to prove that those results are unreliable.

HOPE UZODINMA's Police Witness also contracted Hope Uzodinma's evidences and that ought to kill the case, but not with Tanko led Supreme Court who evidence have shown that they have script to pull the Democracy down!

[/s]

The second thing that went wrong was that Ihedioha’s lawyers simply alleged that the results were forged but they never tendered any evidence to prove their bare assertions. Pray, how can you accuse someone of a criminal offense (forgery) without proving it beyond reasonable doubt. They didn’t even present anything at all. Nothing!

They did not prove their case, they did not produce any credible evidence, but prayed for a favorable judgment in their favor?

Very valid observation. It remains to be said however that only God is infallible!

RareDiamond:

Questions for the CJN, Justice Tanko and other Supreme Court Justices:

1. Does the Supreme Court have powers to formulate and allocate votes as election results?

2. Were the said results certified by INEC as required by law?

3. Did Hope Uzodinma call 388 witnesses from the 388 polling units to speak to the results to obviate the principle of dumping which the Supreme Court used against the PDP and her candidate, Atiku Abubarka, in the last Presidential Appeal.

4. Were the presiding officers and or party agents of the 388 polling units called to testify by Uzodinma/APC, who were the Petitioners?

5. What are the figures from each of the various 388 polling units generated and allocated to Hope Uzodinma/APC by the Supreme Court?

6. Is the Supreme Court saying that all the votes from the alleged 388 polling units were for the APC alone in an election that was contested by over 70 candidates?

The above questions raises some valid points that any reasonable Nigerian ought to be asking by now.

I already explained why Buhari had to use the CJN to deliver Imo to APC at all costs.

The answer is simple. Buhari will never relinquish power to a south-westerner in 2023. His covert plan for a third term (through that failed social media regulation bill) has been squashed, therefore his Plan B now is to use the South East to retain power in the north in 2023.

He believes the igbos will gladly accept and support a vice presidential slot under a new northern presidential candidate, this is why he needed to secure a state for APC in the South East at all cost.

But with this action, Buhari has just placed the final nail on the coffin of Nigeria's fourth republic and if Tinubu were to be really as smart as the South Westerners says he is, he ought to have seen the mene-teke-farsi on the wall by now.

It's 60 years since Nigeria gained independence, out of that 60, the North has been in power for over 40. How do you think they've been able to pull it off?

Divide and rule! They know how to create enmity between the Southerners (mainly yorubas and igbos) and then manipulate the side that bests suits their quest to retain power at all costs. The yorubas always boast of their education but truth is when it comes to political smartness, they are learners in the face of the North.

Besides, this judicial disgrace that the justice Tanko led Supreme Court just did in order to give Imo to APC at all costs is going to haunt Nigeria's fourth republic till it crumbles. INEC electoral results (democracy) will no longer determine who gets elected into office. All APC needs do is to simply print fake copies of electoral materials, take it to court, and their lawyer will quote this Imo judgment by the Supreme Court as a past judicial reference for why the fake copies must be accepted as valid proofs. The judge will have no option.

I keep repeating that the country called Nigeria is not feasible. Secession is inevitable. Igbos and yorubas can't mix. Same with Hausas,/fulanis and the other minorities. History has it thst the Yorubas, middle belts and Niger deltans are peaceful sets of people except when pushed to the edge. The excessive desire to rule by Hausas and Igbos, at the detriment of the other ethnicities, has been the cause of crisis and economic problems plaguing Nigeria since independence.


The map below best describes the only way forward for peace and prosperity for all Nigerians.
Southwest is Oduduwa Republic
Southsouth is Republic of Niger Delta (Rondel)
South East is Biafra.

This is the only way forward.

NORSYK:


When Tanko disbanded the panel of Imo State case on 3 occasions what does that tell you

Tanko could not have disbanded the panel on "3 occasions" if any of the parties involved did not genuinely request for it. In any case, what is special about Imo State or Emeka Ihedioha that Tanko would hell bent on removing him. Why Emeka and not Ikpeazu of Abia or Gov of Enugu?

NGpatriot:
Unfortunately, our so-called leaders of tomorrow are on the internet rambling tribalism, religious bigotry and other ignorant phrases instead of reading and analyzing what actually transpired and what led to the SC judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

We can not secure favorable judgments through incompetence, laziness and after failing to prove our case with credible evidence.

Whose result did the Supreme Court use in deciding who won the election. Was it the results by INEC?

LegalAnalyst:
From the very beginning, I knew something went wrong. No sane justice of the supreme court will accede to political pressure to upturn an electoral victory of an opposition party in zone such as South East; bearing in mind of the many recent events in the zone.

But the perception that judiciary as presently constituted is Buhari's puppet makes some Nigerians, especially PDPs, think Tanko-led Judiciary has compromised.

Let's agree that INEC did not supply any evidence, whose result did the Supreme Court use to decide the winner of the election?

PDP didnt check VAR after the case Anyways Do you speak Chinese or you someone who does? We are currently hiring a Chinese speaking customer care representative with a very attractive salary. To apply see my signature or follow us on Instagram @bquinssolutionlimited and send us a message.

Government magic
We day look

They will always have 10 reasons.
To any side they choose to favour ...


If you know, you will say yes .

d

festacman:
I sympathize with Emeka Ihedioha. Losing a life-changing court case is never a pleasant experience but an unanimous judgement by seven Justices of the Supreme Court should have doused emotional outbursts and insults that were were hurled at the Temple of Justice. Unfortunately it did not. The integrity, qualifications, intellect and mental health of the judges were questioned by members and supporters of opposition. Even some senior lawyers threw caution to the wind and made dangerous insinuations without waiting for the details of the ruling. SMH

Something is still not right. INEC didn't supply any result which would have been an evidence for or against. Whose result then did the Supreme Court use?

PDP and INEC don't have what it take to disproof the results.

festacman:


Tanko could not have disbanded the panel on "3 occasions" if any of the parties involved did not genuinely request for it. In any case, what is special about Imo State or Emeka Ihedioha that Tanko would hell bent on removing him. Why Emeka and not Ikpeazu of Abia or Gov of Enugu?

Tanko was acting based on the orders given to him. Is there nobody who wasn't shocked on that abracadabra judgment?
Brother be truthful to yourself nobody will arrest you, the deal has been done

Summary of the Ruling:
(1) PDP failed to work with INEC.
(2) APC colluded with some INEC ofiicials to produce a fake result from the 388 PUs.
(3) INEC knowing fully well their abracadabra, they failed to tender any documents in Court
(4) Justice kekere-Ekun was confused and baffled about Inec decisions not to tender results.
(5) Justice Kekere-Ekun mistook lower court decisions to be mis-carriage of Justice and ruled otherwise
(6) Justice kekere-Ekun is still confused as I am typing

[quote author=NGpatriot post=86072551]

https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/24/amanze-ajoku-how-inec-and-lawyers-ruined-ihediohas-case/[/quote

I know the guy must have raked more than he spent for this election through security votes of almost a year.

shadeyinka:

Something is still not right. INEC didn't supply any result which would have been an evidence for or against. Whose result then did the Supreme Court use?

That is the question they have refused to answer.
What Supreme Court should have done in the case like would have been order for a rerun

slivertongue:
APC will not know peace

How does this meaning to the facts in the post. If you can't bring a counter claim, stop commenting. I do know who curse don kill.