ozo13:
how sir?
Jus be calm.am sure In the coming days, similar past judgments where pdp gained from will surface.all 7 judges can’t be compromised at the same time.
I don’t know about the details of court judgement as regard the ekiti senate election where the pdp candidate went to court vs apc /INEC and she was able to prove beyond doubt she won the election and her valid votes were not completely given to her by INEC.the judges didn’t order for a rerun but the pdp senator was declared the winner.
Am sure in the coming days people will do research and enlighten us as regards previous similar judgements

OgundeleT:

It seems you have made up your mind to criticize the judgment.
Tell your party to show the world the real results with them and let's close the matter.

shadeyinka:

They didn't o!
0
Zero count for each one of the parties

Blindersoff:


It is not a long read for someone who is very curious to know the truth. You should read it and save yourself the embarrassment of disputing Justice well served

https://www.nairaland.com/5649058/full-supreme-court-judgement-imo

Mandeyy:
You're sense.less! When did the Igbo want to rule? It was the 1964 Western electoral crisis that made the military strike. And the coup was not planned by Igbo officers alone. Besides, it was the North that used Akintola to cause problem in the West. Some young military officers couldn't stomach the North's excessive use of power and Northern agenda, and they struck. Nigerians hailed them initially, but as saboteurs (like you), they turned around and called it an Igbo coup. What were the coups led by Buhari, Babangida and Gideon Orka called? Was the killing of Murtala Mohammed by the Middle Beltan soldiers called a Middle Belt assassination of a Head of State? Were other tribes killed as Igbos were killed in 1945? Or would Igbos fold their arms and watch themselves being wiped out of this world? Igbo is one of the most peaceful tribes, because they don't look for troubles. They've been in business all along. Just carry your wahala to Britain who foisted the North on others and leave Igbos alone. After all, the purpose of Tinubu and other South Western politicians was to support Buhari and then rule Nigeria afterwards.

shadeyinka:

My take is this:
1. INEC could have been compromised by PDP (hence the first result)
2. INEC could have been compromised by both APC and the Supreme Court through the FG (hence the latest result)

If we can agree that one of these two took place, then INEC must be brought to book. Either way, some people should pay for distorting the integrity of an election.

Do you think there is a third option?

shadeyinka:

The truth is simply stated.

Blindersoff:


Not the SC because there is no appeal before them in that regard

Blindersoff:


As i submitted

shadeyinka:

Either way it goes, INEC was compromised. Someone must be made to account for it. That is my position.

shadeyinka:

I hate PDP as a party.
I detest the hopelessness APC has imposed upon Nigeria.

I am only on the path of justice and fairness

shadeyinka:

I asked you two simple questions

ozo13:
I think there are lots of i dotting and crossing of t in the current electoral laws that need to be done

shadeyinka:

Either way it goes, INEC was compromised. Someone must be made to account for it. That is my position.

Neyoohpompy:
Summary of the Ruling:
(1) PDP failed to work with INEC.
(2) APC colluded with some INEC ofiicials to produce a fake result from the 388 PUs.
(3) INEC knowing fully well their abracadabra, they failed to tender any documents in Court
(4) Justice kekere-Ekun was confused and baffled about Inec decisions not to tender results.
(5) Justice Kekere-Ekun mistook lower court decisions to be mis-carriage of Justice and ruled otherwise
(6) Justice kekere-Ekun is still confused as I am typing

Xisnin:
Fake analysis.
It is not the duty of the court to accept any document presented by a plaintiff.
If such a principle is generally applied, society will collapse.
Imagine what thieves and fraudsters will gain if merely presenting a document to a court
automatically make it legit.


Imagine someone presented to the court a purported receipt to your phone claiming they own it.
Should the court give them the phone because they ask for it?

What if the only issuer of such receipts declares it to be fake?
Shouldn't that be sufficient?

What if the court discovers that the date on the presented receipt is fake, should
the court steal your phone and give it to the complainant?


What any sane, sensible person would have done when they discover that Uzodinma's
fake results actually makes the total votes greater than the accredited voters is to dismiss his case or
declare the election null and order a rerun.

Xisnin:
Fake analysis.
It is not the duty of the court to accept any document presented by a plaintiff.
If such a principle is generally applied, society will collapse.
Imagine what thieves and fraudsters will gain if merely presenting a document to a court
automatically make it legit.


Imagine someone presented to the court a purported receipt to your phone claiming they own it.
Should the court give them the phone because they ask for it?

What if the only issuer of such receipts declares it to be fake?
Shouldn't that be sufficient?

What if the court discovers that the date on the presented receipt is fake, should
the court steal your phone and give it to the complainant?


What any sane, sensible person would have done when they discover that Uzodinma's
fake results actually makes the total votes greater than the accredited voters is to dismiss his case or
declare the election null and order a rerun.

muykem:
I agree with you but what blindfolded PDP lawyers also. I am still confused like other people you mentioned above. Where is INEC authentic results for those polling units?

OgundeleT:

INEC and Ihedioha compromised INEC and the SC did the right thing.

Blindersoff:


And i gave you an answer that should answer those and any other future questions you might have. Read the Judgement!

festacman:
I sympathize with Emeka Ihedioha. Losing a life-changing court case is never a pleasant experience but an unanimous judgement by seven Justices of the Supreme Court should have doused emotional outbursts and insults that were were hurled at the Temple of Justice. Unfortunately it did not. The integrity, qualifications, intellect and mental health of the judges were questioned by members and supporters of opposition. Even some senior lawyers threw caution to the wind and made dangerous insinuations without waiting for the details of the ruling. SMH

OgundeleT:

If you are on the path of justice and fairness, you won't be supporting the crime PDP committed in IMO state. Thousands of people was disenfranchised in 388 polling units, you are supporting the criminals(PDP and INEC) and you are telling me you are for justice and fairness.

shadeyinka:

No, that wasn't an answer.
It's like asking you a question in the court and you say "all the evidence are already submitted my Lord!"

OVIHINNO:
Any sane mind will know 7 supreme court Justices can never be compromised at the same time. Agreed those results might have been forged but the onus of proof lies on the respondents. Like its said; He who allege must prove. The supreme court only worked with facts presented before her. Supreme court judges don't dwell on sentiments and emotions.

Blindersoff:


As a free citizen you have the right to sue. So go ahead and help us Sue Inec

shadeyinka:

That's your view!
For me, either way, INEC must be brought to book.

If they aren't brought to book within the next 3 months by the FG, then it's an evidence that the beneficiaries (APC) are the culprit.

Blindersoff:


You asked me a question and i referred you to the Judgment given to read and you still talk about evidence in the face of Judgment? Guy shift abeg you are confused

maestroferddi:
You can continue regaling yourself with a motley of verbiage.

Every objective lawyer knows this ridiculous attempt at explanation is nothing short of a crass overture after the fact.

You can hire hacks from all corners of the globe to venture into rationalize a blatant somersault of natural justice and legality....you are deceiving no-one but yourselves.

Pray that you guys hold power ad infinitum because the very day the opposition will reclaim it, you will be remonstrating from this national space...

OgundeleT:

That isn't my view but fact. It is not necessary anymore since the correction has been made by the court. A collation officer think he can cancel results and the court just said no, you can't.