CaveAdullam:
He's the "so called godfather of the manosphere... A typical misogynist, a woman hater, a broken man. His blog and his books are the most misogynistic book ever written in history."

Do you know about illimitableman/@tellyoursonthis? "He's the most poisoned amongst them in manosphere".

"All redpillers are women haters, single, broke and will spend their lives writing about women. Let them marry first and see that NAWALT".

I will remain on this thread, and nobody is gonna take me down. I'm a narcissist, I have killed realism, logical positivism, pragmatism 60 years ago. I am here to stay. I will continually gaslight Glycolysiss, Dapcity 247, Victim01. I'm still monitoring skepticus and martinez39s---bloody atheists.

No one can take me outta this thread! Hurray!

luminouz:


I'm confused!!!

Who really wrote this?

SOZINN:
Women are proof that the universe is expanding.

GLYCOLYSISS:


"Even Men have Higher Forces controlling them. It really took me time to understand these things, reason why I don't usually complain anymore"

These conversation just got more interesting.
Do you know, going by your statement I quoted, we don't have free will ?

I noticed that was one foundation that Mrcoldswe** guy is trying to disprove AWALT redpill teaching.
Look at it these way :

If everything we do is caused by forces over which we have no control,then we don't have free will, just an illusion that we do.
If our actions are caused by forces over which we have no control, we do not act freely,therefore, we never act freely.
Simple stuff!

It has been proven over and over again, that human behaviors are very predictable, and some certain factors influences our behavior, like gene and our environment.

I want to ask you these question, do you think we as humans have free will or is it an illusion of free will we are exercising ?

I know you're not the guy I should be asking these question, but your response will go a long way..

iskalamong:

True.
This should be done in all areas of his life. Some of these areas include (in no particular order):

1. Physical (Appearance)
2. Social (Solid interaction skill! High social status!)
3. Financial (Money! Assets! Wealth!)
4. Intellects (Intelligence! problem solving! Leadership!)
5. Sexual/ romance (Flirting! Cuddling! Fu<king!)
6. Abilities (singing, playing instruments, Dancing, comedy e.t.c)

This will make you a true alpha and irresistible to both men and women, young and old, acquaintance and strangers e.t.c.
You will be super attractive, almost irreplaceable, highly valued, needed and respected by these people.

Iskalamong

TheExclusive:
Hi Guys, a thought Just came up in my mind about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Is Harry actually a simp for losing royalty because of a woman? If he didn't marry Meghan, that incident may not have happened.

yorubarere:

The confuse man roaming free on the thread canceling posts and seeking for attention.

Peaceyw:

Guy, I don't understand this, can you explain for me Thanks

CaveAdullam:
Who is your bro? You broke redpiller!

As an idealist I'm going to modify the words: man, bro and masculinity. Let me tell what I'm aiming for;

1. To become a cockerel. I want freedom. I love seeing naked hen. And I don't know why men should be concerned about women trying to go liberal and do whatever they like. I feel like crying.

2. I killed pragmatism, logical positivism, empiricism 60 years ago and with my idealist frame we're setting women free from the shackles of men.

3. I want redpillers to always kiss the ground when they see an idealist. Oh! I forgot, I was trying to repair a damaged wh0re but she won't stop cheating. In fact I'm waiting earnestly for her punishment because I cheated on her once. This is my aim again: to educate redpillers to try as much as possible to repair damaged women for their own longevity.

4. Men are the most violent creature. Women are very innocent and beautiful. I want you all useless broke redpillers to appreciate and start worshipping women.

6. Lets redefine masculinity. We should allow women enter the STEM field why men become hairdressers, manicurist etc. In the next 50 years I see this happening.

7. Wow! I'm a proud narcissist, a male feminist, even if I don't really know my purpose on this thread, I'm gonna disgrace all redpillers especially Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01.

8. You see that little baby girl called caveadullam who got no spine to even quote me, I'm gonna teach him a lesson and his eyes will be open. Their general overseer Glycolysiss can't see I'm a male feminist and a narcissist. I will continue to expose him.

All redpillers are broke, misogynist, single and still living in their mother's basement. Weak old children.

I will not leave this thread. My religion is the best. F^ck REDPILL useless amorality.

I will not create another thread. We must redefine masculinity, set women free, allow men walk freely like cockerels.

Only martinez39s understand me and can give you idiots a summary. He is the best summarizer on nairaland.

Hurray! Hurray! Hurray!

Peaceyw:

Guy, I don't understand this, can you explain for me Thanks

SOZINN:


There are more women than men
Women are still giving birth

luminouz:


Very true.

That's why I'm rarely boastful of my achievements in life. I find out that once I scale that particular Rubicon, I become rather bored.

Maybe it's just me.

yorubarere:

Another simp post. Right from time I knew you re not on men side but on the women side. That is why u made ur first post to appeal to men emotions and make them see the illusion of what they could gain if they drop their pride and become less of a man. Why should a man even think of becoming less? And also lose his pride and self worth? Is it because you already lost yours? And you are looking for gang mates who would experience your version of 11yrs of pains?

Your major aim here is to promote feminism and equality while selling men fake dreams. At this point I am convinced that your have exchanged ur balls for a taste of pussy.

I will keep exposing you for what you are. I will achieve either of these 2 goals:

1. Chase you out of this thread.

2. Or make you misbehave and miserable.

I am okay with either of the 2 options but I will feel more better with option number 2

MrColdsweat:
Are you not interest in finding out if you are being lied to?

When they say all women are like that, on what basis? What scientific, psychological or statistical test did they perform on women to conclude that 100% of women are like that?

So, someone can wake up and say, "all women are this", and we should accept and propogate it without verification?

Let us put the red pill to a truth test.

MrColdsweat:
1. If there are no absolute truths, them every truths in the redpill philosophy is false.
Never say "there is no absolute truth" in an argument. It is self-defeating and self-contradictory.

2. The redpill is not logical/rational. It is pragmatic. It works for you, fine! It doesn't, discard it. But the nature of the ideology is not the issue. The issue is its contents.

One of the contents is AWALT.
"All women are like that."
This statement is contradictory to the concept of freewill because the human mind is subject to change.

Please give Links or results of psychological tests you redpillers performed on women which proves that 100% of women behaved in a certain manner or showed the same tendencies.

Give us a 100% percent psychological test result to back up your claim on AWALT.

You're doing a good job BTW.

MrColdsweat:


1. Your excess faith in science as the only path to truth is dogma. We call it scientism. In the abstract sense, there is no difference between religion and science because they both possess methodologies.

2. Falsification is the fuel that drives science. Let's say i come up with a scientific theory A and I'm awarded a Nobel prize, my theory A is assumed true. If you come up with theory B, which proves that my theory A is false, them theory B becomes true and my theory A becomes false. Because of this method, we keep falsifying and we will not get to the absolute truth. Darwin's theory is true, but has a cash prize for the falsification.
This makes science only a path to knowledge but never a path to truth.

Therefore, the testosterone and other scientific reasons to your acclaimed male superiority can be falsified, and is most likely false.

MrColdsweat:
You know Christianity. But should a Christian be on this thread peddling hate against against women?

If we insist that men must always rule over women for some reasons known to men, should we condemn the Islamic fundamentalists who insist that Muslims must always dominate and rule over Christians?

Vecto:
He is not confused. If you don't get the joke then that's your problem. We get it. Intelligent fun isn't meant for everyone.

SOZINN:


I think so, I also read an article about how Prince Harry has been doing everything possible to please Megan Markle.
Some of them working in there at the time said he would literally do anything for her.
Also I think he's a simp because he married a divorcee and she's older than him.

Martinez39s:


NB: these are my observations and disagreements with Mrcoldsweat.


^{GLYCOLYSISS, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, skepticus, caveadullam, ichidodo.}

Martinez39s:
Mrcoldsweat started with some truth, but he wasn't straight with his words. Despite my attempts for him to be specific and make him give his ideas a clear and unmistakable structure, he persisted and remained obstinate in making vague statements and introducing other confusing ideas that could be easily misconstrued: the general and vague statements about eliminating gender norms, modifying masculinity, and gender equality.

Seeing his recent insistent attempts on subtly trying to eliminate the concept of AWALT, and falsely accusing this thread of harbouring misogyny and hatred towards women should raise valid suspicion. Also, the unrealistic solutions and seeming misapprehension of hypergamy by a supposed redpiller and the backpedaling that followed leave a lot to be desired. This SEEMS to SUGGEST that his earlier meanderings and refusal to use specific wordings could have been a deliberate attempt to build the grounds on which to subtly sow wicked seeds that would germinate and insidiously sway us from the red pill truths. This is plausible and makes a lot of sense.

Though he made some good points earlier and people misunderstood some of the things he said, that I grant, his recent posts sound suspicious and they seem to explain his deliberate persistence in using spurious and vague words to convey his ideas. This is plausible, and his aim should be questioned. Many at times, vagueness and mystery of ideas are the bedrock of bùllshits. We should cast a wary eye on him. Earlier on he said we should stop seeing women through a moral lens, but as the animals they are: selfish, wild and unpredictable; but now he is challenging the concept of awalt and accusing men here of misogyny.

Here are his recent posts


No nawalt preacher will thrive here, neither is this place a thriving ground for the nawalt concept. If we actually believe in nawalt unicorns, what then is the need of the redpill? Why not abandon the red pill and go find a nawalt? Why go through the stress of reading and discussing red pill?

Redpillers are not forcing their ideas on anyone. If you think there are nawalt unicorns or that the redpill has no solid basis, that's fine and you can feel free to leave. As long as this group exists, the total acceptance of AWALT concept shall remain undying no matter what you say.

"what is your evidence of AWALT?"
"have you been with all women to conclude that AWALT is valid?"
These questions, as insinuated by your post, are nothing new. They are hackneyed questions that we are tired of. They are usually the words of females and simps. Despite all the patterns all redpillers observed on a daily basis, and are still observing (the red pill proves itself daily), that made them embrace the red pill and the confirmation from others who also observed these patterns, you expect these questions to deter anyone from the red pill? You need to do better. Even though we can't prove our experiences to you, our observations are enough for us, we go by them, and we are not bothered to prove it to anyone.

If you think nawalt unicorns exist, fine for you but we are not participating no matter what. So if at all your aim is to make us doubt the AWALT concept, you are free to go on but you will be wasting your time. Finally, science and religion are not the same in an abstract way.

NB: these are my observations and disagreements with Mrcoldsweat.


^{GLYCOLYSISS, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, skepticus, caveadullam, ichidodo.}

Martinez39s:
Mrcoldsweat started with some truth, but he wasn't straight with his words. Despite my attempts for him to be specific and make him give his ideas a clear and unmistakable structure, he persisted and remained obstinate in making vague statements and introducing other confusing ideas that could be easily misconstrued: the general and vague statements about eliminating gender norms, modifying masculinity, and gender equality.

Seeing his recent insistent attempts on subtly trying to eliminate the concept of AWALT, and falsely accusing this thread of harbouring misogyny and hatred towards women should raise valid suspicion. Also, the unrealistic solutions and seeming misapprehension of hypergamy by a supposed redpiller and the backpedaling that followed leave a lot to be desired. This SEEMS to SUGGEST that his earlier meanderings and refusal to use specific wordings could have been a deliberate attempt to build the grounds on which to subtly sow wicked seeds that would germinate and insidiously sway us from the red pill truths. This is plausible and makes a lot of sense.

Though he made some good points earlier and people misunderstood some of the things he said, that I grant, his recent posts sound suspicious and they seem to explain his deliberate persistence in using spurious and vague words to convey his ideas. This is plausible, and his aim should be questioned. Many at times, vagueness and mystery of ideas are the bedrock of bùllshits. We should cast a wary eye on him. Earlier on he said we should stop seeing women through a moral lens, but as the animals they are: selfish, wild and unpredictable; but now he is challenging the concept of awalt and accusing men here of misogyny.

Here are his recent posts


No nawalt preacher will thrive here, neither is this place a thriving ground for the nawalt concept. If we actually believe in nawalt unicorns, what then is the need of the redpill? Why not abandon the red pill and go find a nawalt? Why go through the stress of reading and discussing red pill?

Redpillers are not forcing their ideas on anyone. If you think there are nawalt unicorns or that the redpill has no solid basis, that's fine and you can feel free to leave. As long as this group exists, the total acceptance of AWALT concept shall remain undying no matter what you say.

"what is your evidence of AWALT?"
"have you been with all women to conclude that AWALT is valid?"
These questions, as insinuated by your post, are nothing new. They are hackneyed questions that we are tired of. They are usually the words of females and simps. Despite all the patterns all redpillers observed on a daily basis, and are still observing (the red pill proves itself daily), that made them embrace the red pill and the confirmation from others who also observed these patterns, you expect these questions to deter anyone from the red pill? You need to do better. Even though we can't prove our experiences to you, our observations are enough for us, we go by them, and we are not bothered to prove it to anyone.

If you think nawalt unicorns exist, fine for you but we are not participating no matter what. So if at all your aim is to make us doubt the AWALT concept, you are free to go on but you will be wasting your time. Finally, science and religion are not the same in an abstract way.

NB: these are my observations and disagreements with Mrcoldsweat.


^{GLYCOLYSISS, Dapcity247, yourubarere, TheVictim01, skepticus, caveadullam, ichidodo.}

TheVictim01:
MrColdsweat initially had a good motion, but along the line he got discourage as he'd expose of his little confidence too much and got superposed by the citing of his indiscretion. He can't handle criticism, but decided in aiming for a battle with critiques.

luminouz:


Chill bro

....he meant the coldsweat guy

Vecto:
Oh sorry, my bad!

yorubarere:
That is why I ignored your earlier post
How are u buddy?

Vecto:




Doing great bro.
And you?