jaephoenix:

Oh, finally. A brave agnostic answers. Hallelujah praise thy Noodly Limbs, the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster. I bless your Holy Pasta.
Whoa!
Please don't be annoyed. Let me digest this breakthrough in this discourse. Lemme take a breath…

What's the bravery talk for ? I just saw your mention

If you want to take this as a joking session, I will ignore you

jaephoenix:

Again, I never mentioned aliens. Dammit!
Answer the question

So why are you mentioning dragons and other things?
Stick to the god debate. You are avoiding the alien analogy because your logic will collapse there

jaephoenix:

I asked you a simple question but you like many agnostics here dodge bullets.
HAVE YOU SEEN A FOSSIL BEFORE? Whether live or pictures.
If you don't know what it is, you can always Google

You see what i mean?

The Bible never talked about FOSSIL so anything could be escalated after secretly planting it but whatever creature they talk about since we can't see it now then we can't use what was escalated to judge because humans are capable of anything as in anything!

jaephoenix:

Bro, again. I never mentioned aliens. In fact, I'm not interested in them.
I SIMPLY ASKED IF THERE IS A RED DRAGON, OR A BIRD, HOVERING OVER YOUR HEAD.
Why is this question evoking severe deflection antics from agnostics?

does your dragon analogy also apply to aliens and warmholes?

I want to know

jaephoenix:

I meant a dog, not birds. Check the original post, I have corrected it.
That's what happens when one multitasks

So can you show me how a goat turned into a dog?

triplechoice:


What's the bravery talk for ? I just saw your mention

If you want to take this as a joking session, I will ignore you

No bro. Not joking. You won't understand. I have asked many agnostics that simple question, but I dont get an answer. You're the first to do that.

jaephoenix:

No bro. Not joking. You won't understand. I have asked many agnostics that simple question, but I dont get an answer. You're the first to do that.

You are making it seem like a joke. You asking faulty analogical questions and then you want to choose where your analogy apply.

If you sk me about dragons, then you analogy should alps apply to aliens.

Workch:
So why are you mentioning dragons and other things?
Stick to the god debate. You are avoiding the alien analogy because your logic will collapse there

Some theists worship dragon as “god”.
That’s why i said you lack what “god” means.

Workch:
So why are you mentioning dragons and other things?
Stick to the god debate. You are avoiding the alien analogy because your logic will collapse there

We can argue about aliens later. But now I'm all about that simple question. A dragon isn't an alien, so I wondered at how you connected them

jaephoenix:

We can argue about aliens later. But now I'm all about that simple question. A dragon isn't an alien, so I wondered at how you connected them

I will answer you questions if you agree that your dragon analogy applies to aliens as well..

You don't get to choose where to apply the analogy.

Does your analogy also apply to aliens? Yes or no

jaephoenix:

So now we have gotten somewhere. I thank you dear TripleChoice for such bravado on breaking out of your agnostic 'shell' and embracing reality.
And no, I dont see any flying dragons, hovering over my head. Or anything at all on my head.
So may I ask, how did u come to such a conclusion that there's nothing hovering over you? Forgive my inquisitive nature

You were the one who claimed a dragon is hovering over my head which I can't see.

So you should know what to do first

jaephoenix:

We can argue about aliens later. But now I'm all about that simple question. A dragon isn't an alien, so I wondered at how you connected them

a creator is not a dragon. I don't see how they connect.

This is why your question does not make sense to me. Same way dragons are not aliens

triplechoice:


You were the one who claimed a dragon is hovering over my head which I can't see.

Immaterial dragon

Workch:
a creator is not a dragon. I don't see how they connect.

A creator too is not a “god”.

Workch:
You are making it seem like a joke. You asking faulty analogical questions and then you want to choose where your analogy apply.

If you sk me about dragons, then you analogy should alps apply to aliens.

How do dragons and aliens connect?

jaephoenix:

How do dragons and aliens connect?

same way a creator and a hovering dragon connects to you.

Can't you see the flaw in your analogy?

Workch:
same way a creator and a hovering dragon connects to you.

Can't you see the flaw in your analogy?

This is illiteracy. Don’t you know what “creator” means?
Is “creator” a name?

Workch:
I will answer you questions if you agree that your dragon analogy applies to aliens as well..

You don't get to choose where to apply the analogy.

Does your analogy also apply to aliens? Yes or no

No. It doesn't apply to aliens. And I never mentioned aliens, you did.
And no, I'm not trying to choose where my analogy applies. I just asked a simple yes or no question. We haven't even gone from point A to B.

jaephoenix:

No. It doesn't apply to aliens. And I never mentioned aliens, you did.
And no, I'm not trying to choose where my analogy applies. I just asked a simple yes or no question. We haven't even gone from point A to B.

Most Agnostics are theists sympathisers.

jaephoenix:

No. It doesn't apply to aliens. And I never mentioned aliens, you did.
And no, I'm not trying to choose where my analogy applies. I just asked a simple yes or no question. We haven't even gone from point A to B.

But you are mentioning dragons, where did I mention dragons myself.
The topic is creator, how did you smuggle dragons into it and you don't Want me to smuggle aliens? 😁

Try to make analogies that make sense so you don't get caught up

triplechoice:


You were the one who claimed a dragon is hovering over my head which I can't see.

So you should know what to do first

Lol. I simply asked you if you see any dragons. How does that translate to claiming a dragon is hovering over you?
Its a simple question which (for some reason) agnostics find that uncomfortable.
But now u have answered, I asked a rejoinder. Please do answer that.
We are getting somewhere

Workch:
a creator is not a dragon. I don't see how they connect.

This is why your question does not make sense to me. Same way dragons are not aliens

Good. Its a simple question, whether it makes sense or not is irrelevant. Please do answer it if you can. Thank you

jaephoenix:

Lol. I simply asked you if you see any dragons. How does that translate to claiming a dragon is hovering over you?
Its a simple question which (for some reason) agnostics find that uncomfortable.
But now u have answered, I asked a rejoinder. Please do answer that.
We are getting somewhere

When did I announce to you a dragon is flying over my head for you to question me over it?

Answer me

And why are you asking me what you say you can't see yourself?

Does that make sense to you?

jaephoenix:

Good. Its a simple question, whether it makes sense or not is irrelevant. Please do answer it if you can. Thank you

So can we stick to the god debate? Do derail it with Martian dragons and indigo borrowing bird analogy.
They don't make any sense

triplechoice:


When did I announce to you a dragon is flying over my head for you to question me over it?

Answer me

And why are you asking me what you say you can't see yourself?

Does that make sense to you?

he just keeps asking stupid questions.
I don't even know how these questions are going to provide evidence for or against a creator.
And he can't even see the ridiculousness of the question

Workch:
So can we stick to the god debate? Do derail it with Martian dragons and indigo borrowing bird analogy.
They don't make any sense

Leave him. I know where's heading to . I have met his type before

Yall will eventually see the folly in agnosticism.

triplechoice:


Leave him. I know where's heading to . I have met his type before

he wants you to agree with him that there no evidence for it hence it does not exist. But that does not apply to the argument of a creator... Atheists sometimes cannot reason differently from theists.

Is it wrong in someone admitting that he doesn't know soemthing and then becoming neutral to it?

Workch:
It's wrong in someone admitting that he doesn't know soemthjng and then becoming neutral to

If you know something you won’t need to believe it.

Atheists don’t “believe” in god.

you no go school?

Workch:
he wants you to agree with him that there no evidence for it hence it does not exist. But that does not apply to the argument of a creator... Atheists sometimes cannot reason differently from theists.

It's wrong in someone admitting that he doesn't know soemthjng and then becoming neutral to it

I want to see how he is going to make me agree with him. I haven't announced any dragon to him, yet ,he wants me to talk about it

jaephoenix:

Please go back and reread my posts. This time slowly, and before then, take your haldol.

Stop sniffing cocaine, you dont have anything to say.

MaxInDHouse:


So can you show me how a goat turned into a dog?

He has
In his own lab