GOFRONT:
The petitioner is just like our proverbial Politicians who love to amass Fleet of cars without using them and they dont want others to make use.

I think the judge should provide a Palliative for the respondent to cushion the effect of withdrawal of the car, cos it truely belong to the petitioner.

Your're very funny but your analogy is so wrong Lol. That toy was probabilty gifted to that young man by his dad or mom , but policticians gifts their selves our national cake.

The court should seize the toy and give a verdict that whoever needs the toy must apply to the court to rent the toy for a certain duration of time. Case close.

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

Oga judge you are the culprit here. Buy another toy for the toy lover so that the toy holder will have his to hold. A win win case for both the petitioner and the accused.

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

The toy should be under the custody of the owner, of course. Now, for the respondent to enjoy the privilege of using the toy, first of all, she must acknowledge the ownership of the property by the petitioner and duly accord him that respect as the owner—how? By asking for the permission to use it each time she wants to. Once the respondent learns how to massage the ego of the petitioner by getting permission from him any time she wants to use it, u will notice they will be no problem again.

What belongs to you belong to you irrespective of frequency of usage. It will be unfair to deny the petitioner ownership of his toy because he decided when and how to play with it.

What the judge can do is persuade the petitioner to give the responder if he longer needs it

Since it is toy and not mandate, provide another toy for the respondent.
E mee nwata ka emere ibeya.......

How to solve the issue.

1.) Hide the toy permanently. or

2.) Get another toy for the owner on the promise that he hands over the old one permanently to the person who really loves the toy. or,

3. Give the toy to the owner and get a similar or better one for the person crying for it. or,

4.) Give the toy to the person who wants to play with it and tell the owner that he should learn to share, that when the person who wants to play with it is tired that it will be returned to him... as real owner. or,

5.) Force them to learn to share by telling them you will be confiscating all their toys if they don't get to learn to share. If you confiscate up to 4 of their toys, they will start sharing so as not to lose the rest of the toys.

All of the above works just fine, but you must be solid on any of the decision taken as above.

Let the owner keep his toy biko and the entitled little madam can trade off with the owner with another toy so everyone could be happy

Dear mommy, this is an opportunity to teach your little ones about contentment, ownership, compromise and sharing.

Buy another one like it for the person who is craving it when it's two there will be peace

The fact that you stole my car and take better care of it than I do doesn't make it yours.

The petitioner is a hoarder. Reminds me of how the government hoarded palliatives during covid-19 lockdown.

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

They should come to a compromise and decides on who and what

Very easy, give it back to d owner

My judgement is that mummy should buy a toy for the respondent in not more than 24 hours. Failure to comply will attract a life imprisonment jail term for the mummy. Case closed

IconicR:
The one who loves playing with it, she needs it more than the owner
The owner is just being petty for always wanting to hold it each time the other wants to play with it. Teach the owner how to let go off things he no longer needs especially when there's someone who is in need of such things.

that is stealing or envy, get your own toy.0he judge must give a clear judgement.

You have to be online 24/7 to know he is always online

Daddyseun1:
IconicR, try to be productive,
u are jobless,
Always on this forum. 24/7

GOFRONT:
The petitioner is just like our proverbial Politicians who love to amass Fleet of cars without using them and they dont want others to make use.

I think the judge should provide a Palliative for the respondent to cushion the effect of withdrawal of the car, cos it truely belong to the petitioner.

Case dismissed, my lord!
You objection is sustained...

I was told, when someone builds on your land... And you didn't emphasize or draw attention to let him know that the land belongs to you, after 7years the builder takes possession of the land and property on it.

Say no to oju kokoro

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

PEPT never ready to give judgement for a case that began long time ago, you want to quickly pass judgement on this one. You no go wait make one of the kids bribe you first? Haba...😂😂😂

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

Can the respondent pls make an offer to the petitioner probably might be willing to sell 😄

These questions should be answered first:

1. How did the petitioner acquired the toy?
2. Is the toy a nonliving thing?
3. Is the toy a living thing/part of a living thing?
4. Is the 'toy' attached to the Judge?

If the answer to questions 3 and 4 are yes, then the defendant should be given custody of the 'toy' it he/she outgrown it.... Lol

Get equivalent toy. One for A, the other for B...
Case closed!

Skyfornia:
So if I own a car and don't drive it, it is right for another to lay claim on my car??

There is no case here...the owner is the owner unless he gives permission to another to enjoy his property.

It's probable!
Even government can allocate a land to u and still retrieve it wen u fail to develop such land within a stipulated time.

Even, Bible talk same. Wen the rich man gave his servants money to do business while he was travelling. We learnt da wen the Oga came back, the servant da buried his own and left it stagnant had his money taken from him by the Oga and given to the people who were productive with theirs. Case closed

There are about four Technicalities in the petitioners case.

The case lack merit, and the defendant is declare the rightful owner of the toy. The petitioners should pay the defendants with 1 cartoon of indomie, I tray of hollandia yoghurt and be ready to do house chore for 3 months under a strict supervision.

i have been laughing, lack of what to say but what belongs to owner belong to the owner. since the owner doesn't what playing with it continue keeping the toy in your possession for a while until you find a reasonable solution to the toy

BluntCrazeMan:
From @General_Oluchi on X-(Formerly-Twitter)


..
.


Source:
https://twitter.com/General_Oluchi/status/1694899224083677230

This is truly a tough nut to crack.

1. The petitioner is the rightful owner but seems not to value his property.
2. The respondent covets the petitioner's property. We are not told if the respondent has her own toy/property.

Legally the petitioner who is the rightful owner should keep his property.
However scripturally, if he does not value his property, God gives it to the one who values it, as long as he doesn't steal it.

This is my 2 cents. May the judge judge wisely.

The judge is guilty. Why buy a toy for petitioner and none for the respondent?

Judgement: buy a new toy for the respondent.

#Slam hammer for table#
Court..!

Daddyseun1:
IconicR, try to be productive,
u are jobless,
Always on this forum. 24/7

I dey tell you, him and TemplarLandry

;

Realtord43:
There is no case here, the toy outrightly belong to the petitioner.

The respondent should be heavily fine for wanting to claim the petitioner property or sent to juvenile prison for attempted theft.

court!!!

Pointless topic.

BluntCrazeMan:
Guys..




Please don't derail this thread.

Just Read And Give Your Decision.

My verdict: Buy another toy for the respondent