₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,247 members, 8,420,950 topics. Date: Friday, 05 June 2026 at 02:56 PM

Toggle theme

ACM10's Posts

Nairaland ForumACM10's ProfileACM10's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 133 pages)

HealthRe: Why Do Mosquito Bite Some And Leave Others? by ACM10: 11:24pm On Oct 30, 2012
virtuoso01: I read somewhere not quite long ago that mosquitoes are attracted to people with AA Genotype much more than other Genotypes.


You can find out more about that.
You might be closer to the truth. During my undergraduate years; I lived in a mosquito infested area with a close friend of mine whose blood genotype is AS. To my chagrin, mosquito hardly bites him. Whenever we are outside, mosquitoes will be mostly attracted to me.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 7:07pm On Oct 30, 2012
Why puncture the lies of someone on your ignore list? grin grin grin
Why not make your so-called analysis without diminishing me?
By the way, I'm yet to see any proper analysis and logic in your comments. Like I previously told u; your logic is warped! And your analysis is faulty! All I see is revisionism.
SMH @ teacher.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:34pm On Oct 30, 2012
***
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:34pm On Oct 30, 2012
Katsumoto: It has been several hours and non of the proponents of 'Awo started ethnic politics' has been able to provide facts to support that notion.

They used to talk about the 1951 regional elections and since actual results of the elections have been provided, they have learned not to bring it up. Well at least one of the proponents, ACM10, reaches the library in his grandmother's village riding a tortoise.

On this thread, they have repeated the same lies and when challenged, they (OnlyTruth, Abagworo) have been silent. Yet they will claim to be honorable men.

The questions remain
1. How did a regional ethnic party increase its representation in other regions significantly?
2. How did a regional party manage to win more seats outside its base than in its base?
Why do you like to taunt my id?

In this thread,

1. You displayed an utter ignorance by failing to mention economic indices which are used to determine the strength of currency.

2. You failed to prove that Biafran pounds was worthless.

Your best shot was to paste an unrelated article which was totaly based on speculation.

You are such a sulky dude. I know that I've dented your pride from my unexpected ambush. I have showed the forumites that you are a hollow copy and paste artist. You have no monopoly of history or facts. Expect some challenge from me. If I have the time to research more on some of these topics; I would have busted more of your lies.

With respect to 1951 regional election. I read it as a passing quote from Mathew Mbu in a book. You copied an extended article written by someone online to show that AG won the election. I have read the said article too. I cannot be able to provide any further proof to show what transpired after the election and the actual number of elected NCNC politicians who carpet-crossed to AG. Can you rest the case now? I will continue to put the question across to those who knows about the event to guage their opinion or see if they can suggest a book for me to read to learn more. A prominent Awoist actually stated explicitely that they induced some members of NCNC to carpet-cross to prove to Zik that they are the "overwhelming" majority. Yorubas continues to use that tactics to this day. Tinubu's ACN induced some Labour party members to defect to ACN before the election so as to weaken Mimiko.

You cannot change the fact that AG was a regional party. Many authors across the divide labelled AG a regional party. Their extreme regionalism was the reason why they could not go into alliance with NCNC. There are many factors why a party wins election outside their main base of support. It could be that they presented a a credible candidate whose personality is powerful enough to overcome the odds and stereotypes inorder to win election. Arguing that they won the election because AG was popular in those areas does not add up.
I know that you will argue many years later that ACN was popular in Anambra because Ngige won.

Finally, can you tell us the places in the north where AG won those seats?
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 12:34am On Oct 30, 2012
ekt_bear: It seems that the onus is on you to respond to the posts I made nearly three weeks ago, which you have yet to address.

Once you do so, then I'd be happy to respond again.
Buzz off! And pls don't harass me next time. I hate empty boasts. I get bored debating with people like you. You are obviously a kid. I can sense that from your comments. The claim that you beat me mercilessly was an indication of immaturity.

WTF am I doing with u?!
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 12:27am On Oct 30, 2012
Katsumoto: ACM10

Why do you persist in debating topics that are above your pay grade?
Really?

During the war, Biafran currency had value. At the end of the war, it no longer had any value.
How can you claim that a currency which was still used as a means for the exchange of goods had no value? It had value; only that the central mechanism for the control of the currency had been removed. Any paper that can be used to exchange goods and services has value.

Currency is not an asset; it is just paper. It is only has valuable as the goods and services for which it can be exchanged within an area as a medium of exchange. Would a meat seller in Kano accept your Biafran pounds? Can you pay for a haircut in New York with Naira? No to both questions. However, if a currency has cross-border strength, it could be used.
You are contradicting yourself here.

The market determines the worth of a currency but it is influenced by central bankers through monetary policy. How investors and users respond to policy is what determines the value. You can also peg a currency but that equally has implications because pegging requires central bankers to use reserves to maintain the peg.
Investors response to government policy is not the only determinant of the value of a currency. It is part of the factors which determines the value of a currency.

Biafrans wanting to have their own currency after the war is impractical for the same reasons as a man with 30 children, 80 grand-children, and 150 great grandchildren. You can exchange your currency within your family but at some point you have to exchange your goods and services for those being exchanged outside your family and you can't force them to accept your currency.
But, it's unfair to grab their wealth from them by fiat. Wont it be nice for Awolowo to step asides and allow economists to determine how to integrate the currency of the defunct Biafrans to Nigeria? Why should Awo take the lead in the process?
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 12:12am On Oct 30, 2012
ekt_bear: So, your best bet is to carefully read the two posts made. Like I said earlier, take as much time as you need to digest the point. Then once you finish, come up with a suitable response, quoting as needed.
I hope you wont bore me tonight? Pls respond to my last comment.
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 12:01am On Oct 30, 2012
ekt_bear: Sure, just examine the last two posts I made to you before you vanished. Take as much time as you need.
1. You claimed that Biafran currency was useless and valueless. Then I asked you "on what ground did you make such claim?"

2. I asked you to list the economic indices which economists use to determine the strength of any currency. You could not mention any. You only opined that the strength of currency is determined by the forces of demand and supply.

Etc
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 11:50pm On Oct 29, 2012
ekt_bear: What you have tolerance for is irrelevant, in my eyes.

Simply address the points raised. Put up, or shut up.
Don't get emotional my dear. There is no medal to be won here. I will like to have the points which u raised. Can you list them. List them while I review the thread from where I stopped. But you have to be ready to address my points too.
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 11:43pm On Oct 29, 2012
Now, I hope that you will beat me black and blue. I expect you to go straight to the point. I have low tolerance for round-the-circle argument. Ok?!
PoliticsRe: In His Own Words: How Awolowo Defended Himself From Achebe’s Accusations When He by ACM10: 11:41pm On Oct 29, 2012
lol
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 11:30pm On Oct 29, 2012
Any intelligent contribution? I get bored easily with pointless comments. If you sincerely believe that I was beaten mercilessly; what prevents you from re-enacting the feat here? I don't chest-thump! I only bow to superior argument. I'm waiting. . .
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10:
Andre Uweh: Boy, this your post is totally irrelevant to the thread. In this thread, you can tackle him on what he has argued upon. Why bring up silly issues from another thread.
Have you started following a nairalander here sheepishly?.
You can guage someone's age from his comment. He thinks that I'm here for a shouting match. Or a personality contest.
He was arguing pointlessly on that thread. He claims to have obtained a higher degree in economics, yet his knowledge of economics is infantile at best. One of the disadvantages of anonymous online forum is that folks assume personality which eluded them in real life.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 10:55pm On Oct 29, 2012
ekt_bear: Is this the same ACM10 who failed utterly in the previous thread? The guy who ran away from it after being beaten mercilessly?

ACM10: Shouldn't you feel ashamed to be opening your mouth again?

wtf is this
Sorry, what's your point? This is the problem I have, debating with kids here.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 10:25pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ACM is being flogged at history and now wants to turn to Economics. grin grin grin

I am not even going to waste my time trying to teach cos I know irs a waste of my time.

First go back to your high school teachers and ask why a party in opposition can't implement policy.

You were very busy. grin grin grin
Look at this mumu grin grin grin
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 10:24pm On Oct 29, 2012
Deep Sight: Hi Katzumotz.

I would only remind you that many of the points you raise regarding Zik can equally be said of Awo.

Please try to be unbiased: I enjoy reading you cos u are usually very objective.


Don't try to paint one a saint, and the other a demon.

Be fair to both. When you see circumstances that qualify the actions of one, please also see circumstances that qualify the actions of the other.

It would be stretching things to typify Zik as some greedy monster only intent on power, and claim that Awo was not similarly obsessed.

Cheers.
I can't believe that you used the word "objective" to describe Katsumoto. That dude is far from objective. He is a Yoruba ethnic jingoist intent on spreading false informations and miseducating the populace. Have you seen him critcize Awolowo or any of his conduct on this forum? He never believed that Awolowo did any wrong.
I'm tempted to conclude that you are new to this forum. Maybe you don't follow his argument on divisive issues here.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10:
Katsumoto: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



'The total value of each series printed, based on the numbers extrapolated above, was £50 million for the first issue and £148.5 million for the second issue, making a total of £198.5 million. Many of these notes were not delivered to Biafra, but it is not known how many were successfully conveyed to their destination and how many remained in storage at their point of production. However, at the end of the conflict it was estimated that between £115 and £140 million in Biafran currency was in circulation, indicating that a large proportion of the currency was delivered into circulation. While this amount may seem large, it must be remembered that Biafra had a population of 14 million, and the amount in circulation would equate to £10 per person at the most optimistic estimate.'

http://www.pjsymes.com.au/articles/biafra.htm

When I educated you on the other thread, you ran away claiming you were coming back. You didn't come back, yet you surfaced on this thread asking for the same data again. Are you so think in the head?


If there was an exchange mechanism for the exchange of Biafran notes for the Nigerian notes, what were you expecting the Nigerian government to do with the Biafran notes once the exchange was completed?

It has estimated that between there was between 115 and 140 million pounds in Biafran currency at the end of the war and there were approximately 14 million Biafrans giving a value of 10 pounds per Biafran. Yet, each depositor was given 20 pounds. Assuming that kids did not have accounts, there would have been approximately 7/8 million depositors leading to a total sum of 140/160 million spent by Awo.

The Nigerian government also allowed old Nigerian notes and Biafran notes to be exchange for Nigerian currency until the end of 1968 and each individual depositor was given a maximum of 30 pounds and 500 pounds for organizations.

Lastly, when questioned about acceptability and exchange rates, Pius Okigbo stated publicly that both factors were irrelevant since Biafran notes were meant to be spent within Biafra. If the Biafran economic adviser stated publicly that they were unconcerned about exchange rate and international acceptance, then why moan about receiving an amount and not being able to exchange their notes for Nigerian notes?
This is my comment which precipitated your load of excrement above
ACM10: Beyond your careless assertion, can you
show me an evidence with any economic
indices that 20 pounds was higher than
the total value of Biafran currency.
Sentiment aside! I expect you to furnish
me with raw economic indices. I get
bored by long grammar.
I was unable to continue the debate on the other thread because I was so busy. People were waiting for me. I mostly come here to peep then contribute and leave. I hardly sustain an argument from an obviously ignorant folks. I know that you will interprete it as a sign of victory. Don't celebrate yet. My dear, you are clueless! I'm shocked that you don't know the economic indices which are used to predict the strength of currency; yet you claim to be educating me. These are some of the economic indices which predicts the stregth of a currency:

1. Government fiscal and monetary policy

2. Interest rates

3. Gross domestic products

4. Consumer price index

5. Employment indicators

6. Retail sales

etc

This is the problem I have with copy and paste artist. In their mad rush to support your argument, you copy and paste an unrelated article from the web.

20 pounds were given to only the priviledged few. I don't know where you got your 7/8 million figure from.

Nigeria is estimated to be 160 million. Do you know that Naira in circulation runs into tens of trillion? So what is your agrument here? This does not mean that I've accepted your 115/140 million pounds figure. Awo knows the total amount of pounds in circulation. He chose not to disclose the figure.

Really, you've not answered my question and I feel disappointed knowing fully well that you prides yourself as nairaland intellectual.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 9:40pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: 1. When Akintola was ousted by the AG, Adegbenro was elected by AG and not Awo. Try and do some reading.

2. Yes, the world knows Igbos to be very altruistic. But then again, what can one expect from a man who expects an opposition party to formulate and implement policy.

3. I did not state that Zik had to lose a relative to prove his selflessness; my point is that since he didn't lose a relative, it was easy for him to forge ahead with one Nigeria.

Its unfortunate that there is no pill to help develop a logical mind.
Who finally won in the power tussle between Akintola and Awolowo?
Who was consigned to the dust bin of Yoruba politics?
Who finally became bitter?

You must have been riding roughshod on your low IQ cheering audience with your warped logic. It's unfortunate that I'm no such type.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 8:29pm On Oct 29, 2012
ACM10: Beyond your careless assertion, can you
show me an evidence with any economic
indices that 20 pounds was higher than
the total value of Biafran currency.
Sentiment aside! I expect you to furnish
me with raw economic indices. I get
bored by long grammar.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 8:16pm On Oct 29, 2012
Andro Blaze: @ Katz

I wonder why you bother with these lazy literates- its criminal that anyone should school people this much and not get paid!!!

@ACM10

Why don't you go and ask your secondary school government teacher why a minority party cannot force its policy on the majority party- as they say in Pidigin "your head de touch".
You have no intelligent contribution of your own to make. It's a shame that you prides yourself as "literate".
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 8:12pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: Hahahaha

I will continue to school you.

Zik made an address to the Ibo union in 1949 which was basically an ethnocentric speech. Two years later, he would try to be premier of the Western region and fail. Do you think he would have attempted to win the election in the West with the Ibo union? Of course not. He needed a Yoruba formed party for that.
First of all, can you post the transcript of Zik's ethnocentric speech. Zik had always tried to separate his tribal from national personality. How do you expect Zik to speak in the gathering his people?

Secondly, had Zik ever demonstrated that he was willing to ram his ethnic agenda down the throat of Nigerians?
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10:
Katsumoto: It is a fact that Awo was jailed for treason, without evidence and on the testimony alone of Maja. I can equally go forward and tell the whole world that you are planning on topping GEJ's government. Should that be enough to jail you? In any civilized society, Awo wouldn't not have gone to prison.
Awo was tried in a civilian court. His attorneys were given an ample time to defend their client. He was subsequently found guilty of conspiring to overthrow the constituted authority. Awo was convicted of treasonable felony. Such a deeply flawed man. If he was popular as he claims, why did he lost in the power struggle to his deputy? Why can't he wait for the next election to test his popularity? Why resort to undemocratic method to get to power?

Again you are a donkey for trying to blame the civil war on Awo rather than your murdering brothers and Ojukwu who went to war because he was afraid of being removed by Gowon.
You are a revisionist a-s-s. Debating with you is like debating with a deaf. You made up your mind before coming into a debate. And you are prepared to cite any analogy to bolster your warped logic. The coupist were motivated by the nationalist zeal. The western region was in turmoil. People were dying everyday. The country was ungovernable. So the struck to restore normalcy. They claim that their aim was to restore Awo back to power. Hardly do they know that Awo was a con politician. His outward character was deceptive.



What Nationalist? Zik simply had his eyes on other regions. Since Zik did not lose any relatives in the 40s or 50s to ethnic violence, he found it convenient to forget the differences with other groups and that was why he was told by Bello that differences can't be ignored.
What an a-s-s! You expect Zik to lose his relative to prove his selflessness? Prove that his nationalist posture was motivated by greed?

Awo was a war time finance minister. Nigeria fought a civil war without borrowing money. How many nations do you know who fought wars without excessive debt?
Oil revenue in that hands of the federal forces was enough to pay for the cost of war. Remember that Nigeria had so much surplus during the reign of Gowon that he once boasted that Nigeria was looking for how to spend money.

The overall value of the 20 pound policy was higher than the total value of Biafran currency at the end of the war. So, yes, he sound economic policies.
Beyond your careless assertion, can you show me an evidence with any economic indices that 20 pounds was higher than the total value of Biafran currency. Sentiment aside! I expect you to furnish me with raw economic indices. I get bored by long grammar.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 7:35pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: Do you see why you are a slowpoke. Tell us what made the AG aregional party, you are referring us to statements that were made when there exists facts that kill that notion.



So you were expecting the party in opposition to implement policy in the East and North!!!! You really are a donkey.
You are an a-s-s. Why didn't he suggest to Gowon of the need to implement such policy all over the federation? He was busy pursuing indigenization policy and other ethnic agenda for the benefit of Yorubas only.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 7:31pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: The fact remains that Egbe Omo Oduduwa became a political party which had a number of non-Yoruba amongst its ranks. All political start has ideas and then morph into something else. Abraham Lincoln was the Republican party elected president who fought to end slavery. The Christian Social Union of Bavaria is a Bavarian party that is the current coalition ruling Germany.

The question is ,'how did Awo start ethnic politics?'

Bear in mind the following

1. Egbe Omo oduduwa was formed years after the Ibo state union was formed with Zik as president.
2. The Nigerian youth movement of which Awo and Zik were members was dissolved as a result of the fallout of an election in 1941 between Samuel Akinsanya (supported by Zik) and Ernest Ikoli supported by Awo. Ikoli won said election and Zik's accusation at the time? That it was an Eko conspiracy against Ijebus! never mind that Awo was Ijebu.

You lot keep repeating these lies against the person of Obafemi Awolowo. They said he started ethnic politics with cross-carpeting, produce the results which says so, you can't. ACM10 is still on his way to his grandmother's library in her village riding a tortoise. Maybe he will produce the results by 2062.
Did Igbo Union metamorphosize to a political party?
Zik separated his tribes sociocultural agenda from national politics. Prove that he mixed the two. Why was Awo's case different? It is just like Ohaneze Ndigbo registering as a political party. Whose interest do yo think they will defend?
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 7:16pm On Oct 29, 2012
Andro Blaze: I really don't get why our Eastern brothers on NL fail in Logic every single time!!! I mean if all the books tell me the sun is blue and every morning it comes out yellow- would I insist on being as stupid as the books?? Can I not think for myself?

A tribal party that increases it share in other regions and has a majority of it seats in other regions; while the nationalist party decreases its share in other regions and has its majority seat from one region; Igbo, Lies and Propaganda- the conjoined Triplets!!
Buzz off! You've just proved that you are incapable self thought. Have you asked yourself where they won those seats? And, did they win those seat because of the popularity of their party in those areas or by the power of personality?
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 7:09pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: When people use emotions to debate, they are bound to ignore logic in their positions. I challenged Abagworo and OnlyTruth to provide facts that support Awo introducing ethnic policies but they are hiding in the shadows. When you challenge their silly lies with facts, you are labelled a revisionist or tribalist.

They should at least try and refute your 'facts' with their own 'facts' but no, it is their opinion that we have to accept.
Stop mas.turbating on another person's comment. You are the one who is debating with emotion. Which fact did you bring to the table to buttress your argument? Your analogy does not add up. Almost everyone across the wide divide which includes some northerners like Sanusi claimed that Awolowo's party was a regional party-cu.m-tribalists.

Did Awolowo implement free education in the areas they control in the north and east?
Why did he not propose free education for the rest of the country when he was in the position of authority?
How did Awolowo policies favour Nigerians in general when he was the federal finance minister?

Remember that Action group startted as "Egbe omo odua" which was an umbrella group of all Yoruba speaking confederates. Which later metamorphosized to AG. So Awolowo's party had a regionalist root. Compare with NCNC which started as a nationalist party.
When many people who hardly agrees says the same thing, then you have to re-examine your history.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 6:48pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: STFU

If the AG was implementing regional/ethnic policies, it would not have increased its vote from 1 (1954) in the North to 25 (1959) and from 7 (1954) to 14 (1959) in the East.

It is you that has a warped logic. Look at the results and stop yarning dust as usual.

Can you tell us what these nationalist policies Zik proposed. The argument about Zik being a nationalist had nothing to do with policy but personal ambition. Agreed he wanted Nigeria at all cost but why was that? What was so attractive about Nigeria that Zik was willing to forget differences between cultures and the loss of Igbo lives in the 40s and 50s?
Zik was in favour of African emancipation!
Zik was against the unfair trade practices of the British colonialist where they impose the price of all the commodities on the locals.
Zik was against the exploitation of the locals who works for the British companies.
Zik was a vocal opponent of the corruption and the nepotism of the British colonialists.
Zik strongly believed that Nigerians can manage their affair without British intervention.
Zik was in support of developing the local communities with the natural resources mined from their land.
Zik was in favour of social justice.
Zik was in favour of equality.
Zik strongly believes that Nigeria can only grow if the best man for the job is allowed to take the mantle.
Zik was against the federal character system, regionalism, nepotism, etc.
Zik was prepared to make the necessary sacrifice for the good of the nation.
Etc

Awolowo was implicated in a coup plot against the Balewa government.
Awolowo wanted to bring down Balewa government when he lost out in the local power struggle.
He instigated crisis which made the western region ungovernable and eventually the whole of Nigeria. This precipitated the civil war.
Awolowo does not have a history of making the necessary compromise for the good of the nation. His political creed was "my way or no way".

On the question of "What was so attractive about Nigeria that Zik was willing to forget differences between cultures and the loss of Igbo lives in the 40s and 50s?"
In essence, we are saying the same thing. Zik was a nationalist leader who was willing to make sacrifices. He was willing to forgive for the common good of the nation. I read Zik's speech after the British police officers murdered 21 protesting coal miners in Enugu. He was such a statesman. He was simply an awesome leader. Nigeria has never produced a leader after Zik who is willing to view events with an objective mind. I can quote several comments where Awolowo bitterly condemned Zik, but I've never come across any qoute attributed to Zik where he unleashed equal venomous attack on Awo's character.

Finally, Can you tell us the nationalist policies which Awolowo implemented when he was an all powerful federal finance minister?
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 6:10pm On Oct 29, 2012
T9ksy: David mark hasn't said anything that one doesn't already know and thus vindicates no one lest of all, the ibos.

It's common knowledge that neither awo nor the sardunna was for one nigeria except zik and his ibo people.

And no one was left in any doubt as to why the ibos wanted one nigeria- certainly not for the love they harbour for their fellow potential countrymen but GREED![/color]
Zik wanted one Nigeria not for the love of his country but GREED?!

Interesting!
A greedy Zik later reached a compromise with the premier of the north inorder to win them over to pro-independence group.
A greedy Zik was prepared to take a ceremonial role inorder to advance the interest of his countrymen.
A greedy Zik refused to support Biafra, claiming that he can't support the killing the child he reared.

Zik was an epitome of selflessness among politicians of his era. Zik was a flawed man just like every other politicians of his era. But Awolowo was a deeply flawed man. . Awolowo was fond of playing playing ethnic politics whenever he fails to get his way. His lust for power was legendary. He loves to diminish his opponent in his mad quest for power. His attempt to sideline Akintola displaced him from power and ultimately landed him in prison.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:44pm On Oct 29, 2012
[size=38pt]The reported exchanges among
our founding fathers are instructive. It
was said that

Nnamdi Azikiwe, eager to
forge one nation with one destiny asked
Ahmadu Bello: ‘Let us forget our
differences’.

Ahmadu Bello was reported
to have instead responded: ‘No: let us
rather understand our differences’.

In
another case,

Obafemi Awolowo was
reported as saying that ‘Nigeria is a mere
geographical expression’[/size]
(Prof. Chukwuma Charles Soludo)
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:35pm On Oct 29, 2012
Katsumoto: Some of you don't try to learn and verify facts for your yourselves; you just accept whatever you are told.

In the 1959 elections to decide the first government, AG won 35 seats in the West, 5 in the mid-west, 25 in the North, 14 in the East, and 1 in Lagos.

NCNC won 58 in the East, 21 in the West, 2 in Lagos, and only 2 in the North.

If AG was a regional party, how come it won more seats outside its base in the West? Yet NPC won most of its seats in the North and NCNC won most of its seats in the East.

If we look at the origins of the NCNC, one will realize that it was a National party started by Lagos Yoruba but was turned into an Igbo party by Zik (just look at the results). The seats won in the West are as a result of the groundwork of the original members of the NCNC. The 'national' party had no showing in the North.

NCNC founding executive: Herbert macaulay - President, Azikiwe - General Secretary, Oyeshile Omage - Financial Secretary, Dr Olorun-Nimbe - Treasurer, Onojobi and Ogedengbe - Auditors, Akerele and Odunsi - Legal advicers
Your logic is often warped. Do you know that an individual can win election by the sheer power of his personality? Just like Chris Ngige and Tony One Week did in Anambra. Their feat did not qualify ACN as a national party. Many authors labelled AG a regional party because they pursue regional agenda.
Presently, I'm reading a book titled "How Zik Fought For The Freedom And Unity Of Nigeria" by Anikputalu Egwuonwu. I'm amazed by the extent to which Zik abandoned the Igbo agenda to pursue nationalist and pan-African agenda. It's a shame that revisionists like you are labelling Zik by implication a regionalist.. I can't believe that the very things Zik fought for are being enjoyed by the people outside his ethnic group.
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:07pm On Oct 29, 2012
(continued)
Is anyone therefore surprised that under this framework, public policy is tainted by ethnic rather than national colourations? Is anyone also surprised that under this framework, continuity of public policy will remain elusive? A public official assumes office and sees the policies of previous occupants of the position as not favourable to ‘his own people’ and therefore either abandons or reverses them. That is the Nigerian story. I am not surprised that there is no national ideology, because we are not yet sure whether we are just a ‘country’ or a ‘nation’.


In Nigeria, residence means very little. Once you leave your ‘state of origin’, you remain a ‘foreigner’ or a ‘non-indigene’ even in your own country. Even if five generations of your family have lived in a place other than the original state of your forefathers, you are still a non-indigene and will be discriminated against. Let me tell a real life story. Sebastine Nwankwo was born in Kaduna, and was six months old when his parents moved to Abuja in 1985.

His primary and secondary education was in Abuja, and he attended the University of Jos. He speaks fluent Hausa, does not speak Igbo, and his parents paid their taxes in Abuja for over 25 years. When he applied for a federal employment last year, he indicated Abuja as his ‘state of origin’. He went for interview but was queried about his ‘state of origin’. The interview officer insisted that Nwankwo is an Igbo name and could not possibly have come from Abuja.

He called his father to remind him what that ‘our state of origin is’, since he couldn’t remember when last he visited Imo State—which is supposed to be his ‘state of origin’ since his parents come from there. He did not get the job. Imagine what kind of Nigerian he will become and the nature of his allegiance to Nigeria!
I know many Nigerians who have now ‘modernised’ their surnames so that no one can determine or guess their ethnic origin or state of origin. You now have such names as Angela Johnson, Jimmy Peters, Edna Jerome, etc. It is the new survival strategy.


State creation has worsened matters. In many states, the concept of ‘indigenes’ vs non-indigenes has surfaced. Civil servants hitherto recruited in the civil service before states were created were required to go back to their states of origin. Those still remaining in the employment of the ‘old’ state knew that their fate hung on the balance, and were often dismissed without notice. Non-indigenes are often employed on contract basis while permanent, pensionable positions are reserved for indigenes.


Some of us believe that the first step in creating truly Nigerian citizens is to abolish the concept of ‘state of origin’ and replace it with ‘state of residence’. We must create a new Nigeria as a melting pot where every citizen can reside anywhere and proof of residence becomes the basis for all entitlements.

Funny enough, state of origin is the basis for most public sector privileges, but when it comes to population census, no one is asked to indicate his ‘state of origin’ or even his ‘religion’. For revenue allocation, states collect money from Abuja based on the population ‘resident’ in their states. When it comes to extending privileges, employment and appointments we suddenly dust up ‘state of origin’ and discriminate between indigenes and non-indigenes. Nigeria is a country in denial!
Loyalty by citizens requires some investment by the country on her citizens. What does Nigeria offer its citizens to elicit loyalty? I recall that in my secondary school days, oil money in the 1970s was used to subsidise education at all levels. In my secondary school, we received double bunk beds.

In the university, we had free tuition and subsidised meals and accommodation. I feel a sense of indebtedness to the country. What about the generations after us? They only hear that some $600 billion have been earned from oil and wasted, and the country cannot guarantee any of the basic necessities to her citizens. For the citizens, if they survive, it is not because the state provided them any of the basic institutions and facilities that citizens of other countries take for granted but largely in spite of the state. In this survival of the fittest, what is the basis for loyalty to the ‘nation’?



A starting point is the deliberate creation of a new Nigerian citizenship with absolute loyalty to Nigeria. Only then can a critical mass of national elite, with a national ideology and strategy emerge to drive sustainable transformation of Nigeria. Page 27 of Nigeria’s Vision 2020 document provides an important first step.

It argues that “the emergence of a merit-driven culture is, therefore, a key outcome of Vision 20:2020 and an area of immediate policy focus. To this end, a comprehensive review of ethnic balancing measures and diversity management related laws (e.g. federal character) will be undertaken with a view to ensuring greater promotion of merit…” Let us get started, and constitutional amendment is

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/are-there-nigerians-to-develop-nigeria-/128999/[/quote]
PoliticsRe: David Mark’s Neo-Zikist intentions by ACM10: 5:05pm On Oct 29, 2012
[quote author=TRUTHTELA]Are There Nigerians to Develop Nigeria?

by

Chukwuma Charles Soludo

Nigeria is a country and its legal citizens are called Nigerians. But do we have Nigerians whose primary and total loyalty, patriotism and commitment are to Nigeria rather than to some primordial sectional, religious or ethnic groupings? Aside from the armed forces which are duty-bound to do so if necessary, how many Nigerians are prepared to lay down their lives in defence of our collective heritage - Nigeria? How many Nigerians are losing sleep about what they can do for Nigeria rather than what they can scavenge from her? In this piece, our central premise is that not many countries in the world have developed or been transformed without a strong sense of citizenship and nationalism. Put differently, we wonder how far and how fast Nigeria can develop if our constitution and legal system have created a country as a geographical space where ethnic nationalities will perpetually be in conflict over the struggle for a diminishing national cake rather than a theatre of collective destiny and opportunity.


Transformational leadership is not a one-man affair. It requires a critical mass of people who share a common vision and strategy. In the case of countries, such a critical mass of leaders often shares an undiluted commitment to the ‘nation-state’. The kind of visionary, selfless, patriotic leadership we all dream for Nigeria cannot emerge and survive in an atmosphere where loyalty lies primarily in the primordial cleavages.


Since Lord Luggard created Nigeria almost 100 years ago, our leaders have struggled with the questions of ethnic nationalities vis-a-vis the Nigerian ‘nation’. The reported exchanges among our founding fathers are instructive. It was said that Nnamdi Azikiwe, eager to forge one nation with one destiny asked Ahmadu Bello: ‘Let us forget our differences’. Ahmadu Bello was reported to have instead responded: ‘No: let us rather understand our differences’. In another case, Obafemi Awolowo was reported as saying that ‘Nigeria is a mere geographical expression’ These seemingly contradictory visions of the ‘country’ versus ‘nation’ by the founding fathers of Nigeria continue to re-echo today. The unrelenting calls for a ‘national conference’, whether ‘sovereign’ or not, is a reminder that nearly 100 years after, Luggard’s amalgamation remains a work in progress.


The various constitutions and laws of Nigeria have pursued two seemingly contradictory objectives of forging a nation-state with common citizenship on the one hand, and seeking to recognise and accommodate our “differences” through all kinds of ‘federal character’ legislations, on the other. Section 15(2) of the 1999 Constitution states that “national integration shall be actively encouraged, whilst discrimination on the grounds of place of origin, sex, religion, status, ethnic or linguistic association or ties shall be prohibited.” Furthermore, in Section 15(4), it states that “the state shall foster a feeling of belonging and of involvement among the various peoples of the Federation, to the end that loyalty to the nation shall override sectional loyalties.” These provisions are in Chapter Two of the Constitution which relate to the so-called ‘unjusticeable’ ‘Fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy’.


In other parts of the constitution which are enforceable as well as other laws of Nigeria, the provisions create and perpetuate allegiance primarily to ethnic nationalities and states of origin. Ministers are to be appointed on the basis of states and not on the basis of interest groups (such as labour, industry, gender, disabled, etc). Recruitment into public institutions and sometimes even promotions are on the basis of a quota system based on states or ethnic nationalities. There is quota system in the army, police, civil service, admissions in universities, etc. Literally every engagement by citizens comes down to ‘what is your state of origin?’ Since citizens depend on their states of origin and ethnic cleavages to move up in life especially in the public sector, their primary loyalty is to these primordial groupings and not to Nigeria.

If all ministers represent geographical areas (their states) rather than interests, who represents Nigeria? The Federal Executive Council (FEC) looks more like the UN General Assembly than a team united as one nation with one destiny. Our belief is that in so far as geographical locations are entrenched in the constitution as basis for national engagement, the clamour for power rotation and zoning based on geography rather than competence will continue to dominate. Nigeria will continue to move in circles!


The constitution and other enactments have the effect of producing tribal or sectional citizens and not Nigerian citizenship. Our laws emphasise what separates us than what unites us. Citizenship in Nigeria is a mechanical, legal appellation and does not evoke much patriotic feelings. If the current laws persist, Nigeria will remain an assemblage of ‘nations’ with each nation struggling to grab as much as possible for its own ‘citizens’.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 (of 133 pages)