ACM10's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ACM10's Profile › ACM10's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 133 pages)
ekt_bear: Stop being dvmb. Haitian currency is not worthless...it has a specific value. There are people willing to buy and sell you Haitian money.My question is, how can you calculate the exchage rate between Haitian currency and foreign currency? I'm disappointed that an economist failed to attend to this basic question. If Nigeria had decided not to accept Biafran pounds, then would there have been anyone willing to buy it? No, there would not.But the people were willing to use their currency. Wont it be wise to hash out a fair currency exchange before retiring the old currency? How on earth can an economist determine the exchange rate between Nigerian money and Biafran money? Or of ANY two currencies, for that matter? Currencies are traded by individuals and/or governments according to supply and demand. Nobody writes a formula saying this is what the exchange rate should be.Again you are are dull student of economics for making the above assertion. Why should economics are sidelined when the issue of adopting a new currency is involved in favour of politicians? Are you claiming that Biafran pounds were being accepted by anyone outside of Biafra?This is a dumb question! Does anyone accept Nigerian Naira outside Nigeria? Stocks, bonds, currency, potatoes, wheat, pounded yam, etc all appreciate and depreciate in value. So how is the analogy silly? Or do you think that there are special rules for currency that don't apply to other investments/assets?The analogy is silly because you failed to explain how they affect foreign currency exchange.[/quote] |
ekt_bear: Stop being dvmb. Haitian currency is not worthless...it has a specific value. There are people willing to buy and sell you Haitian money.My question is, how can you calculate the exchage rate between Haitian currency and foreign currency? I'm disappointed that an economist failed to attend to this basic question. If Nigeria had decided not to accept Biafran pounds, then would there have been anyone willing to buy it? No, there would not.But the people were willing to use their currency. Wont it be wise to hash out a fair currency exchange before retiring the old currency? How on earth can an economist determine the exchange rate between Nigerian money and Biafran money? Or of ANY two currencies, for that matter? Currencies are traded by individuals and/or governments according to supply and demand. Nobody writes a formula saying this is what the exchange rate should be.Again you are are dull student of economics for making the above assertion. Why should economics are sidelined when the issue of adopting a new currency is involved in favour of politicians? Are you claiming that Biafran pounds were being accepted by anyone outside of Biafra?This is a dumb question! Does anyone accept Nigerian Naira outside Nigeria? Stocks, bonds, currency, potatoes, wheat, pounded yam, etc all appreciate and depreciate in value. So how is the analogy silly? Or do you think that there are special rules for currency that don't apply to other investments/assets?The analogy is silly because you failed to explain how they affect the currency exchange.[/quote] |
Dada-Stephen:Ndigbo do not hate the Yorubas. That is simply your personal opinion. We have moved forward. Just that some sections of Nigerians gets annoyed whenever the shameful activities of their past leaders gets mentioned. We have nothing against the Yorubas. I can assure you that Ndigbo are more accomodating than the Yorubas. We go extra mile to protect any stranger in our midst. We don't discriminate! We believe in meritocracy! While our neighbours interprete "meritocracy" as domination. We believe in the principle of "live and let live". It is just that our neighbours often takes advantage of our carefree attitude as a sign of foolishness. No matter how painful the events of 1966 to 1972 is to the psyche of an average Onyeigbo, we still extend our hand of friendship to our neighbours. We else do you want us to do to demonstrate that we have moved on? We get annoyed whenever someone tries to deny or justifies those shameful acts. The same way, Armenians gets annoyed when Turkey denies genocide. |
ekt_bear: See my post above. Like I said...the only criteria for currency exchange is the current price on the market.Thank you! How did prof. Ekt-bear determine the price of the market which made him to pronounce the Biafran currency "useless and worthless"? ![]() When magnanimity costs a lot of money and can potentially ruin your economy if done poorly, then one needs to be careful.. . .and politician Awolowo was in a strong position to determine its impact on the economy? ![]() Well, who was interested in Biafran currency at the time of surrender? Who, other than the Nigerian FG was likely to exchange anything of value for the currency?Biafrans were still interested in their currency. So their feeling must be taken into account. They would like to stick to their former currency if they can't get a better deal with the new currency. This is no different from adopting Euro by the European country. Britain stuck with their pounds because Britons felt that Euro wont offer them a better deal. In particular, if Nigeria had refused to give anything for Biafran pounds, would those in posession of that currency been able to exchange it for anything useful?That calls for the use of dual currency in the same country. Till the economics works out the modalities for adopting a single currency exchange. What about the simple example doesn't make sense to you? You asked, what is the value of Afghanistan money. I answered your question by looking up the price. Of what relevance is macroeconomics in answering your question?So your economics lecturer did not tell you that every acceptable legal tender by a group of people has value? You must be a very dull student. The point of this discussion is now how confusing economics is as a subject to you.Who is confused here? Me or you Someone who pronounced someone's legal tender "useless and worthless" and not worthy of exchange; no matter how little? Someone who studied economics, yet justifies a currency exchange by fiat as opposed to economic principle.ekt_bear: Do you not understand my post? Do you have difficulty reading English? What I want is additional context for what seems arguably a very generous (arguably too generous) policy by Awolowo. I asked someone who might be able to provide this insight.Mr. Man, why do you have to invite someone else to dig you out of your hole? Why delve into a debate with your ignorance, only to ask for help from someone midway? ekt_bear: Lmao. OK. So clearly you don't know anything about currency. You claim that the exchange rate is something that an economist will calculate rather than the market determine itself.Why are you such a clown? Which indices does economists use to calculate the value of a currency? Do you think that economist only sit on a round-table and peg a currency exchage rate? Or peg it on a static rate by fiat like your hero did? Shouldn't you at least talk to one of these economists so they can disabuse you of your notions?I think that you need this advice more than me. Can economists calculate the price of potato too for us? What the "right" price should be of it? ![]() You are a funny economist. How does economist calculate any value to determine market movement then determine the worth of a currency? Can you ask one of these village economists you know to do that, so that we can get rid of the stock markets, exchange boards, etc and just ask your village economist for how much things should cost?You sound pathetic! Your ignorance knows no bound. No wonder why you invited someone to help you out. I can see that this dicsussion is beyond the capacity of your brain. Feel free to invite a helper. |
ekt_bear: Incidentally: http://fx-rate.net/HTG/Didn't you contradict yourself here? In essence, no matter how useless and worthless a currency is, it still retain some value. ekt_bear: If Nigeria today wants to buy some land in the US for an embassy, here is what they'll do:This calls for a straight-forward currency exchange between Nigeria and Biafra. This would had been left to the economist to determine the rate. £20 flat fiat was a wicked policy. There is no justification for that. Awo's intention must have been to humiliate Biafran, thereby lending credence to professor Chinua's use of "frenzy". I'm glad that you admitted that Nigerians patronize Biafran currency. If you are selling a hat, and only one person wants to buy it, then you are in no real position to expect a good price for your product.How do you know that Biafran pounds had only one patron country? ekt_bear: I even misunderstood this whole 20 pounds thing before.Me too! I'm amazed by the concept behind £20 policy if it is not meant to humiliate the war loser. But what appears to have happened is:You are free to imagine, afteral you are entitled to your opinion, but not to your facts. Unfortunately, this is not how life works. I bought a small amount of Hewlett-Packard stock a year ago, it has lost 30% of its value. If i want to sell today, I'll lose money.This is a silly analogy ekt_bear: I've actually taken macroeconomics (and micro, for that matter) before. And done quite well in those courses, for that matter. However, the material is not particularly fresh, nor is it something I use in my career or daily life.If you took macroeconomics in your undergraduate and postgraduate level and still do not understand the concept of macroeconomics as it relates to foreign currency exchange; I'm sorry to say that you are dumb! But none of that is particularly relevant.What is not relevant here? The question we are asking is, "How much is currency X worth at time Y?"Since you admitted that the of currency "X" is vague, why wont an economist be called to determine its worth? Why should a politician determine its worth? Phrased in this way, I can look up the price of a barrel of oil, a bushel of wheat, a euro, etc. All of these resources are fairly liquid and are traded on markets.Can you explain this in the context of £20 fiat? |
ekt_bear: Anyway, Katsumoto or someone else who is very well-versed in Nigerian history...why did Awo give them even 20 pounds?Why invite Katsumoto to help you? Why delve into a discussion with your ignorance, only to call on someone to rescue you? |
ekt_bear: I will print my own Bear Kingdom money, with an official exchange rate of 20 Bear Dollars to USD.There are criteria for currency exchange. Ask any one who did macroeconomics. You are simply exposing your ignorance. ekt_bear: Lord Almighty. Currency is one of the things you don't play with. If you exchange Nigerian pounds for useless Biafran currency, you'll create massive, Zimbabwe-style inflation.God bless someone who seized all the money which Biafrans have in the bank before the war, only to issue £20 to the priviledged few? What happened to a saying that victors should be magnanimous in victory? Yet, you wonder why the debate of what happened 42yrs ago is still raging. Awo was not an economist! Had it been that this issue was left to the economist to work out, this debate would not be raging up till this moment. ekt_bear: So this whole 20 pound saga was you guys b1tching about Awo not giving you a nice exchange rate for your worthless currency?I ask again, can you prove that Biafran currency was worthless? ekt_bear: My question at this point is, why did Awo even do the 20 pound currency?I ponder on that question too. He should not had given Biafrans anything to complete his wicked policies. ekt_bear: http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert/?Amount=1&From=AFN&To=USDYou are not making sense. How much do you know about macroeconomics? Anyway, this is pretty much supply and demand...like trading potatoes or wheat. Forex is actually the biggest market by volume. There are some macroeconomic aspects no doubt...but from the perspective of someone asking the question, "How much is currency X worth today?", that is a fairly self-contained question with a clear answer.Why are you such a clown? No, they convert to some other currency. At which exchange rate? What ever the market (supply and demand) is willing to bear.You knowledge of macroeconomics is limited. Economics is a very complicated subject. More complicated than medicine and surgery. Macroeconomics goes beyond demand-supply. |
ekt_bear: Supply and DEMAND. Where was the DEMAND for Biafran currency? How does one set the price?Where is the demand for Zimbabwean dollars? Where is the demand for Afghanistan currency? Where is the demand for Haiti's currency? There are criteria for estimating the value of a currency. It goes beyond the law of demand and supply. Ask any economist who studied macroeconomics. Who had any desire for Biafran currency except for Biafrans?Does Nigeria buy weapons and ammunitions with Naira? In case you don't know, the major dealers on weapons and ammunition during those cold war era were US and the Soviets. Their allies must get an express approval from them before they sells weapon to you. Do you really know the politics behind the purchase of weapons? Weapons are not freely available in the open market. Those available in the black market are tightly regulated. |
ekt_bear: And he debunked them when he was alive. So....what else is there to say?He debunked nothing! He struggled all through his life to answer those questions. He resorted to making callous allegation against Ojukwu who had never criticized him or the policies he masterminded publicly. |
ekt_bear: What should the exchange rate be between what was at that time a strong currency (Nigerian pound) and a worthless currency (Biafran money)?The problem that I have whenever I debates you is that you allow your bias to affect your judgement. A currency is a currency. Even if it is as worthless as Zimbabwean dollars. Biafran currency can exchange favourably with Nigerian currency. Any economist can do this calculation. Exchanging £20 with any amount of Biafran currency was a downright wicked policy. Nobody was under any obligation to exchange useless and valueless currency for something real........How do you know that Biafran currency is useless and valueless currency? |
Dada-Stephen:We will be glad if you share evidence with us. |
ekt_bear: Notice that they didn't have the stones to talk much when the man was alive.Those accusations levelled against Awolowo have been there when he was alive. Why did he grant this interview if had not heard of the said accusations? |
Just like I remarked in my previous post, I'm unsure if Awolowo had indigenization policy in mind when £20 policy was enforced. Awo woke up after £20 policy to discover that the economic backbone of his rival tribe has been broken. He decided to make a kill by promulgating indigenization policy knowing fully well that it will mostly benefit his kinsmen cos he's well aware that his kinsmen has displaced their rival tribe from the apex of the economic pyramid in the country. He made the time so short so that the easterners will not recover to fully participate in the indigenisation policy. Remember that it's been 12yrs since independence, so why the mad rush to nationalize foreign companies? Why wont a provision be made for the people who are still recovering from the war to participate in the process? Can you see that the policy was "opportunistic"? Though Awolowo may/may not have the policy in mind when he set out to reduce Igbo millionaires to £20 owners, but at the end of the day, he achieved his aim of fatally weakening his rival tribe, then displacing them for good from the upper echelon of the economic pyramid. So he killed two birds with one stone. So his policy can be labelled "subtle opportunistic conspiracy". |
I might not argue convincinly that the Indigenization/nationalization policy was a "deliberate conspiracy", but I can say that it is a "subtle opportunistic conspiracy". You might use "bad timing" to refer to the policy, but I choose "opportunism". Awolowo decided to kill two birds with one stone by enforcing the policy when his rival tribe was economically incapacitated. I can't say for sure that Awolowo had indigenisation policy in mind when he enacted the £20 policy. I will defend my use of "subtle opportunistic conspiracy" by starting with £20 policy. 1. The 20 pound policy was crafted in the context of the power struggles that wrecked our nation. These power struggles had, above all, an ETHNIC coloration, especially between the Hausa-Fulani, the Yoruba and the Igbo. That struggles were the reason, above all, why the Biafran war of brother against brother was fought in such an utterly barbaric and wicked way. When the war ended, the players did not change. They did not convert into saints overnight. Ethnic warlords merely pursued their Power agenda in different ways, using, for example, the 20 pound policy and the indigenization decree. 2. Biafra was NOT a Banana Republic. It may have lost the war, but it was not a lawless entity. It had a functional Government. It had functional institutions. It had an Economic and Monetary Framework. Above all, it had a Central Bank that issued and controlled legal tender. Before they announced the 20 pound policy, they DID ask people to deposit ALL the money -including Biafran Pounds, in banks, abi? This were now Nigerian Banks, not Biafran banks, remember? So they know how much money that was in circulation. Remember that they insisted on only exchanging the money in the banks deposited before the deadline. 3. Biafran currency was NOT printed inside Biafra. They were printed in Portugal and Switzerland. The same way that Nigeria prints Naira in France. Therefore there was no rogue money in circulation. Biafran money was a SCARCE commodity in Biafra! Sometimes, Biafran Banks were closed for days on end , because, they had no Biafran cash to dispense. When they did open, they often had to ration withdrawals. Everybody knew this. The Economists on the Federal side knew this 4. Awolowo's argument that Biafran money will overwhelm the Nigerian economy does not hold water. When the war ended, the Nigerian nation acquired another 16 million citizens -who were already using some form of money. Its like the EU absorbing Greece or Turkey. You do a straightforward currency exchange, however determined. Is it rocket science ?? This fake difficulty was invented by Awolowo and his gangs to justify £20 policy. 5. At the end of the war, people DID expect Nigeria to exchange the Biafran Pound with the Nigerian Pound. Now, most people thought that the Feds would use some ridiculous exchange -something like 20 Biafran Pounds to one Nigerian Pound. Greedy and opportunistic speculators expected the Government to be wicked, but even they, they prepared to make a kill, and in anticipation of an exchange, they purchased Biafran Pounds at the rate of £50 Biafran Pounds to £1 Nigerian Pound. Guess what? Awolowo and his Economists broke the ALL the record and expectations - even the one set by uber-greedy speculators!!! They delivered a fiat 20 pound policy to the priviledged few who had bank accounts!!! Even the speculators went broke! (to be continued) |
CyberG: This interview gives a glimpse of ojuku's thoughts before the civil war. Although he appears to be speaking with confidence, it is clear today that all that bravado was empty posturing, like most ibos still do today. This is not the most important thing to take away from this interview. It is noteworthy to state the following:Why are you such a clown? ![]() Who will bother to debate with you when your bias is so glaring? Your thread is filled with bigoted connotations such that it is impossible to have an intellectual debate with you. In fact, you defeated the purpose of your thread. You are not the one debating, your emotion is debating. This is the main reason why a reasonable historian or enthusiast should avoid your thread. I know that emotion of your kinsmen are running high ever since professor Achebe described the conduct of your hero, Awolowo during the war with an unflattering terms. You guys should admit the truth and move on. Denying it will only perpetuate the debate. But Yorubas choose to double down on their denials and justification. You are only scratching the surface with your youtube videos. Did you watch the Iraqi information ministers daily press conference during the US invasion of Iraqi? Did you watch George Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech? Did you follow Donald Rumsfeld daily press conference during the US-Iraq war? Have you read Sun Tzu's advice on propaganda? You are making mockery of yourself. Propaganda has always been part and parcel of war. Take a chill pill; then come back to open a thread where your bias is hidden, then I will engage you. |
exalt2009: One Question I will love to ask without be bias, where was ZikZik had been marginalised from power. He had no clout in Alaigbo. Events made him irrelevant. Being part of those who survived the Jan. coup, he was concerned of being seen as a divisive figure. He was simply helpless |
nass07: Goshhhhhh!!! I like the igbo tribe, I like having them around. But when they start these their passionate hatred and lack of respect and love for other people I begin to wonder if am not making a huge mistake having unconditional love for my fellow sotherners.am yoruba, but then I hate to partake in all of these.Ndigbo do not hate Yorubas. Just that this is a painful moment of our history. The fact that some of your kinsmen are either denying of justifying it does not help matters. That act is an insult to the collective sensibility of Ndigbo. We must move on, but we are wary of being backstabbed by our fellow southerners. Blame Yoruba elders. |
Awo will be turning in grave for the fact that his kinsmen are denying him his major feat. The feat that he boasted with on the international arena. What a pity! |
sconsults: [size=25pt]why must nigerians lie about everything.nobel prize nominees lists are not published until 40 years after their nomination.nigeria have produced some of the most hilarious liars in modern history philip emeagwali,dr oyibo, dr abalaka etc[/size] |
That's Nigerian justice for u. Jungle justice! Mob rule! Some of those guys may probably steal for fun as evidenced by the guy from a well-to-do family(kinda make we belong). They could hardly guage the amount of pain they inflict on the psyche of the locals; to the extent that they were willing to be filmed while committing savage acts. Too bad that they were not given the opportunity to regret their actions. Youths stay off crime! |
Prof Corruption: That was the comment I made to your indigenisation nonsense you rant about. You won't blame your short sighted leaders but of course put the blame on someone who has no connection with your misery.There is no need to give you a response since your comment is mostly filled with denials, justification and deflection of blame. Afteral Awo's interview is filled with lies, half-truths and exaggerations. So, how do I expect a better response from his supporter? |
If Ndigbo are friendly to Awo, why do we continue to taunt his name? That man was a shameless liar. |
datola: For Prof Achebe, things have not only fallen apart but they are no longer at ease after the civil war. The years before the civil was his best as it was the period the classic novel was written. Hatred might have robbed him of honors of Nobel prize, more classic novels. This has culminated in his recent Memoir of the civil war which is brewing more hatred among the people who are supposed to unite and fight the common enemy.May leprosy amputate your already leprous fingers for daring to suggest that we should condemn one of our greats. Have you condemned Awo for for saying that "all is fair" in a war? |
Follow the debate on post-civil war indigenization policy masterminded by Awo on the thread below. www.nairaland.com/1027995/post-civil-war-indigenization-policy-far-reaching |
Just like I remarked in my previous post, I'm unsure if Awolowo had indigenization policy in mind when £20 policy was enforced. Awo woke up after £20 policy to discover that the economic backbone of his rival tribe has been broken. He decided to make a kill by promulgating indigenization policy knowing fully well that it will mostly benefit his kinsmen cos he's well aware that his kinsmen has displaced their rival tribe from the apex of the economic pyramid in the country. He made the time so short so that the easterners will not recover to fully participate in the indigenisation policy. Remember that it's been 12yrs since independence, so why the mad rush to nationalize foreign companies? Why wont a provision be made for the people who are still recovering from the war to participate in the process? Can you see that the policy was "opportunistic"? Though Awolowo may/may not have the policy in mind when he set out to reduce Igbo millionaires to £20 owners, but at the end of the day, he achieved his aim of fatally weakening his rival tribe, then displacing them for good from the upper echelon of the economic pyramid. So he killed two birds with one stone. So his policy can be labelled "subtle opportunistic conspiracy". |
I might not argue convincinly that the Indigenization/nationalization policy was a "deliberate conspiracy", but I can say that it is a "subtle opportunistic conspiracy". You might use "bad timing" to refer to the policy, but I choose "opportunism". Awolowo decided to kill two birds with one stone by enforcing the policy when his rival tribe was economically incapacitated. I can't say for sure that Awolowo had indigenisation policy in mind when he enacted the £20 policy. I will defend my use of "subtle opportunistic conspiracy" by starting with £20 policy. 1. The 20 pound policy was crafted in the context of the power struggles that wrecked our nation. These power struggles had, above all, an ETHNIC coloration, especially between the Hausa-Fulani, the Yoruba and the Igbo. That struggles were the reason, above all, why the Biafran war of brother against brother was fought in such an utterly barbaric and wicked way. When the war ended, the players did not change. They did not convert into saints overnight. Ethnic warlords merely pursued their Power agenda in different ways, using, for example, the 20 pound policy and the indigenization decree. 2. Biafra was NOT a Banana Republic. It may have lost the war, but it was not a lawless entity. It had a functional Government. It had functional institutions. It had an Economic and Monetary Framework. Above all, it had a Central Bank that issued and controlled legal tender. Before they announced the 20 pound policy, they DID ask people to deposit ALL the money -including Biafran Pounds, in banks, abi? This were now Nigerian Banks, not Biafran banks, remember? So they know how much money that was in circulation. Remember that they insisted on only exchanging the money in the banks deposited before the deadline. 3. Biafran currency was NOT printed inside Biafra. They were printed in Portugal and Switzerland. The same way that Nigeria prints Naira in France. Therefore there was no rogue money in circulation. Biafran money was a SCARCE commodity in Biafra! Sometimes, Biafran Banks were closed for days on end , because, they had no Biafran cash to dispense. When they did open, they often had to ration withdrawals. Everybody knew this. The Economists on the Federal side knew this 4. Awolowo's argument that Biafran money will overwhelm the Nigerian economy does not hold water. When the war ended, the Nigerian nation acquired another 16 million citizens -who were already using some form of money. Its like the EU absorbing Greece or Turkey. You do a straightforward currency exchange, however determined. Is it rocket science ?? This fake difficulty was invented by Awolowo and his gangs to justify £20 policy. 5. At the end of the war, people DID expect Nigeria to exchange the Biafran Pound with the Nigerian Pound. Now, most people thought that the Feds would use some ridiculous exchange -something like 20 Biafran Pounds to one Nigerian Pound. Greedy and opportunistic speculators expected the Government to be wicked, but even they, they prepared to make a kill, and in anticipation of an exchange, they purchased Biafran Pounds at the rate of £50 Biafran Pounds to £1 Nigerian Pound. Guess what? Awolowo and his Economists broke the ALL the record and expectations - even the one set by uber-greedy speculators!!! They delivered a fiat 20 pound policy to the priviledged few who had bank accounts!!! Even the speculators went broke! (to be continued) |
Nobel peace prize just like other Nobel awards is a political award. It is silly to judge an icon with Nobel prize. Obama won Nobel peace prize when he was busy prosecuting a war of attrition in Afghanistan and Pakistan. So it is no surprise that Sultan, who has never condemned Boko haram activities was nominated for the prize. |
^ I politely reject your attempts to lure me into an unrelated discussion. Thank you ![]() |
^ We've debated those issues on many threads here. Open a thread if you would want us to revisit those issues. |
Murtala Muhammed was an uneducated soldier who was admitted into the army on quota system introduced by Balewa government shortly after the independence. He rose to the rank of Lt. Col so fast purely on nepotism. He was the leader of the coup which overthrew Ironsi. He was a blood-thirsty, ruthless and brutal dictator. The forces he commanded were implicated in numerous acts massacres, ra.pe, pillage, looting at Asaba, Onitsha, Nsukka, Awka, etc. He doesn't respect or obey an order from the headquarters. He had numerous followers in the army. He attempted to make many amphibious landing to capture Onitsha, but failed and lost many men in the process. He will forever be associated with mediocrity. He inspired his deputies like Buhari, Babangida and Abacha to nurse the ambition of power. He taught them how to take power with brute force. He is a symbol of a nation where mediocrity trumps meritocracy |
Dudu_Negro: You ignored it because you knew if you responded to it you will be led into a den of traps from which a rescue will be impossible.I'm not afraid to engage you in any form of debate which relates to the civil war. Just that doing so here will derail this thread. I expect you to respond to the points raised by professor Achebe. No need to debate on distant related topics which merits to form a thread of its own. |
k2039: [color=#FF0099] You are definately mad,must you bring your ethnic bigotry here,you are not any different from a racist.I'm not mad my dear. I'm only thinking aloud. Why is treachery a pattern with these people? There were many instances of this act from this ethnic group that I can't help but call them by their name. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 133 pages)


Someone who pronounced someone's legal tender "useless and worthless" and not worthy of exchange; no matter how little? Someone who studied economics, yet justifies a currency exchange by fiat as opposed to economic principle.
