Happy Birthday senior man

This is good news guys

Scientists studied 1,000 couples

Scientists find "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with antiretroviral therapy is zero".

People who are HIV positive and taking medication do not spread the virus when they have sex, a study has found.

It means an end to the HIV pandemic could be in sight.

Scientists studied 1,000 gay male couples - one HIV positive and taking antiretroviral drugs to suppress the virus, and the other HIV negative.
Over the course of eight years, the virus was not transmitted once.

Professor Alison Rodger from University College London, who co-led the research, said the study provided "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with suppressive ART (antiretroviral therapy) is zero".

She added that "this powerful message can help end the HIV pandemic by preventing HIV transmission".

Dr Michael Brady, from HIV charity the Terrence Higgins Trust, said the findings would have an "incredible impact on the lives of people living with HIV".


Over eight years, the virus was not transmitted once

Researchers said the couples had sex without condoms about 77,000 times, estimating that had medication not been taken, there would have been about 472 transmissions of HIV.

During the eight years, 15 men did become infected with HIV, but it did not come from their main partner.

"We used cutting-edge technology to analyse the genetic strains of the virus in the rare cases where a new HIV infection occurred," said Professor Anna Maria Geretti from the University of Liverpool's Institute of Infection and Global Health.

She added: "Our work was key because we were able to show that there was no relation between the virus strains of the two people in the couple.

"In other words, in all cases of new HIV infections, the new virus was so different from that of the HIV-positive partner that it must have come from somebody else."

ART proved just as effective for gay couples as it did for heterosexual couples.

Dr Brady said it was "impossible to overstate the importance of these findings", adding: "The study has given us the confidence to say, without doubt, that people living with HIV who are on effective treatment cannot pass the virus on to their sexual partners."

The study is published in The Lancet medical journal.[img]Scientists find "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with antiretroviral therapy is zero".

People who are HIV positive and taking medication do not spread the virus when they have sex, a study has found.

It means an end to the HIV pandemic could be in sight.

Scientists studied 1,000 gay male couples - one HIV positive and taking antiretroviral drugs to suppress the virus, and the other HIV negative.
Over the course of eight years, the virus was not transmitted once.

Professor Alison Rodger from University College London, who co-led the research, said the study provided "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with suppressive ART (antiretroviral therapy) is zero".

She added that "this powerful message can help end the HIV pandemic by preventing HIV transmission".

Dr Michael Brady, from HIV charity the Terrence Higgins Trust, said the findings would have an "incredible impact on the lives of people living with HIV".

Researchers said the couples had sex without condoms about 77,000 times, estimating that had medication not been taken, there would have been about 472 transmissions of HIV.

During the eight years, 15 men did become infected with HIV, but it did not come from their main partner.

"We used cutting-edge technology to analyse the genetic strains of the virus in the rare cases where a new HIV infection occurred," said Professor Anna Maria Geretti from the University of Liverpool's Institute of Infection and Global Health.

She added: "Our work was key because we were able to show that there was no relation between the virus strains of the two people in the couple.

"In other words, in all cases of new HIV infections, the new virus was so different from that of the HIV-positive partner that it must have come from somebody else."

ART proved just as effective for gay couples as it did for heterosexual couples.

Dr Brady said it was "impossible to overstate the importance of these findings", adding: "The study has given us the confidence to say, without doubt, that people living with HIV who are on effective treatment cannot pass the virus on to their sexual partners."

The study is published in The Lancet medical journal.[/img]Scientists find "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with antiretroviral therapy is zero".

People who are HIV positive and taking medication do not spread the virus when they have sex, a study has found.

It means an end to the HIV pandemic could be in sight.

Scientists studied 1,000 gay male couples - one HIV positive and taking antiretroviral drugs to suppress the virus, and the other HIV negative.
Over the course of eight years, the virus was not transmitted once.

Professor Alison Rodger from University College London, who co-led the research, said the study provided "conclusive evidence for gay men that the risk of HIV transmission with suppressive ART (antiretroviral therapy) is zero".

She added that "this powerful message can help end the HIV pandemic by preventing HIV transmission".

Dr Michael Brady, from HIV charity the Terrence Higgins Trust, said the findings would have an "incredible impact on the lives of people living with HIV".

Researchers said the couples had sex without condoms about 77,000 times, estimating that had medication not been taken, there would have been about 472 transmissions of HIV.

During the eight years, 15 men did become infected with HIV, but it did not come from their main partner.

"We used cutting-edge technology to analyse the genetic strains of the virus in the rare cases where a new HIV infection occurred," said Professor Anna Maria Geretti from the University of Liverpool's Institute of Infection and Global Health.

She added: "Our work was key because we were able to show that there was no relation between the virus strains of the two people in the couple.

"In other words, in all cases of new HIV infections, the new virus was so different from that of the HIV-positive partner that it must have come from somebody else."

ART proved just as effective for gay couples as it did for heterosexual couples.

Dr Brady said it was "impossible to overstate the importance of these findings", adding: "The study has given us the confidence to say, without doubt, that people living with HIV who are on effective treatment cannot pass the virus on to their sexual partners."

The study is published in The Lancet medical journal.

source: https://news.sky.com/story/hiv-breakthrough-as-treatment-eliminates-transmission-risk-11709887

Kalashnikov382:
Hello Nairalanders, My girlfriend of two years broke up with me. She broke up with me because of my financial situation right now.

I have been struggling for like 5 months now then she started acting weird and calling me names. The whole thing started when a guy I don't know bought her an iPhone last month. She lied she got it herself which I know is not true. We fought, argued then she went on to block me on WhatsApp.

After begging her for a month she later unblocked me and started posting pictures of different guys with love emoticons. Then she started asking for money everyday. I told her I would give her if I see her in person that I haven't even set my eyes on her for like 2 months.

She has has been avoiding me but asking me for money. Then Started saying She knew I would never gets out of this broke-ness. She told me I am addicted to brokeness that I can never make it in life. The same girl I pay part of her third year school fee, I paid her final year school when their school payment portal was almost closed, I sold my expensive iPhone and some other gadgets for a very shameful price. I once did everything any guy would do for a girlfriend. I used to spoil her with everything when I have money. I've bought her phone twice, Take care of her school bills time to time. Use my things to loan money to send money to her. I did some stupid things just to satisfy this girl.

After everything she told me I did nothing for her that I am addicted to poverty that they told her I'm destined to be poor. She text all sorts of terrible things and insulted my parents that's when I slammed her with some crazy text back (My parents? No No I won't take that shi.t).

This girl I lose my everything just to make her happy. Worst of it is that I am at the most toughest time of my life now. Last week I lose almost a million, I am still healing from that. Her words are affecting me mentally. I adore this girl because she was once a nice and good girl any guy would want to date in fact to be honest, she is the most beautiful girl I've ever meet all my life.

She believes her beauty can get her anything. Please Nairalanders how can I forget this girl and her words totally. Those words are really affecting me mentally, I am losing hope. Please how can I erase everything from my head. I'm frustrated and depressed

Seriously, guys with this mentality that they must spend on their girlfriend always almost end up miserably, if not dead.

This is pure toxic masculinity, just by being a man you think you should automatically be financially responsible for your girlfriend or wife. You do this because you don't see her as equal, you think she's under you. It's not because of love, is a horrible combination of lack of self-control and toxic ego.

Get wise and stop being enslaved by female beauty

Saffi:
If I tripple the amount myself then my man must double tripple and quartripple the amount that I have already tripled. Thank you.

How can you have this kind of sense of entitlement and still want to be treated as equal with him?

Well, some guys are about to launch a massive campaign to properly educate men on what true equality is, and that includes cutting off most of the unspoken benefits currently being enjoyed by women.

Let's be fair to all

Niangollan42:
Is there any chance of them being Alive ?

Hopefully!

Amakababe:
The Jussie Smollett guy and attention seeking is becoming nauseating.
We get it, you're a hedonistic faqqot, but stop shoving it down our throats please!

As for tonto, she married a batty boy, and presumably we understand where the 'love and support' is coming from. She has once had a taste of gay penis. Who says you can't have your cake and still eat it??

Toxic feminity

delugajackson:
At first, I thought this girl was smart but I never knew she was just as dumb as the other baby mamas in Davido's life. Instead of her to coerce him into marriage, she's busy taking pictures for the gram and showcasing cooking skills that she ain't got.

All these pictures don't mean sh!t if he doesn't put a ring on it. If you aren't book-smart, atleast try to be street-smart. Time waits for no one.

Such a dumb comment, and I even thought you were smart. If you're smart, why haven't you hugged a transformer yet?

sinaj:
Why is this old man like this sef.
Always disgracing himself

Because the current government itself lacks shame.
The entire country is shameless

Liliyann:
The Boyfriend got exactly what he deserved!!
So, he wanted a child yet he was asking the girl to abort for him till the point of her womb being damaged!!
Next time, instead of ending the innocent child life, just end the father's own!!
I hate wickedness!!

The man got what he deserves?
So you don't mind being killed for your sisters misbehaviour ?

Think before you write.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2019, EVERYONE. BETTER DAYS AHEAD ALWAYS.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2019!!!

tossie101:
Davido still get small sense pass that spoilt arrogant midget called Wizkitt Abi na wizcat.

Heaven knows even if the say he is performing close to my street I would blink and eye.
I hate him.

You hate him? He doesn't care, don't even know you exist.�

Interesting15:
This Antichrist

What's wrong with being an Antichrist? Aren't you a satanist?

henryobinna:
You see the problem I have with social media?

Giving attention to worst kind of creatures we have on the planet.

Very despicable people like Freeze should not be allowed to talk to more than one person, and that one person must be his shrink, but guess what? Here we are... Comparing two men of God with Linda Ikeji?

What even gave Freeze the audacity to comment on matters concerning Christianity?

why not he venture into commenting on Islam and we'll see his dumb skull on a stake on the same social media

That same problem with social media is what enables a creature like you to have a say on a topic you know absolutely nothing about

slimdamatrix1:
I'm sick of this man, literally!

Freeze is sick of foolish people too, literally.

Op congrats on your nonsense post

Slikbae:
Thrash from an inconsequential dimwit.
Hey, try to get sense from the nearest vendor.

You should free yourself from HATE against men.

I am not inconsequential and neither am I a dimwit. It seems you're just a naive teenager.

Hating men cannot bring about justice for the victims of rape.

Be reasonable, stop justifying HATE against men due to the crimes of a few.

seunmsg:
I still don't understand why Abaribe is not in detention. He swore under oath to produce Nnamdi Kanu at all times in court till the prosecution is over and the court granted him bail on the strength of that promise. Now that we know Kanu is alive and hiding in Israel, Abaribe should either produce him or be sentenced to lengthy jail term.

Are you aware that Nigerian army invaded his home while he was on a legally granted bail?

If you don't understand court processes you ask questions or keep quiet and observe.

WetinConsignMe:


Lol. U can joke but u r begining to get the picture. Why it is important to say Jesus is because it has been proven through EXPERIENCE that that's a name that rattles dark forces. Those forces are not God, they can't tell what u r thinking, they go by what they see and hear. See, I am talking proven experience while u r talking academics and logic

Yeah I get what you mean bro, but still Daddy Freeze wasn't wrong in pointing out that the original name is Yaheshua

WetinConsignMe:


Like I said, u r now delving into area quite beyond our very limited human comprehension.
Scientists have determined there are up to 10 dimensions. Can u even imagine that? 97% of our universe is made up something we know is there but which we have absolutely no idea what it is (dark mstter/energy). And the biggest of all - who created God?!

Yeah, I've read about dark matter / energy, they're really mysterious

WetinConsignMe:


The understanding is that God understands u even b4 u open your mouth, yet here u r saying God may not understand and insisting that only original given names will do!!

If God already knows what we will say even before we open our mouth, then there's no point for us to go ahead to say it. All we have to do is just to think about it and God will immediately understand, right?

And if we decide to go ahead and say it anyway, then the words we use wouldn't matter at all since God already understands what we actually meant, so that way, when praying we can use words like "J man bless us today" and it won't matter, right?

Slangs won't matter since God understands what we actually mean, in fact we can even make it more funkier like "J ma nigger" bless us today. And God will still answer the prayer

WetinConsignMe:


U r now delving into something beyond our paltry human understanding. Everything is working according to God"s plan, YET we have free will. Does that answer your question?

It's more confusing.

If God planned everything, and it's all playing out exactly as he planned it, then how is there free will?

If it's all God's plan then you can't do anything different from that plan, so where does free will apply?

WetinConsignMe:


But people speak in tongues and use neither name yet the Spirit still understands. What do u say to that?

There's no universal consensus on the correct way to speak in tongues, so we can't always claim that god understands them.

Kakakak yeprimo ventrimi lele sha sha tempremo Jesusu nemeni

Some people still manage to include names when speaking in tongues. And you can't say they're not doing it right cause there's no standard.

So there's no proof that God understands it.

WetinConsignMe:


Of course they are. What's your point.

My point is that based on your submission about God and his intentions, we can safely conclude that all evil or sins originates from God because they're all his intentions, and we humans are only living out what God has already predestined to happen.

So all terrorists and in fact, all sinners cannot be held responsible for their sins or crimes, simply because God intended them to do it.

Is this correct?

Slikbae:
And I guess you were thinking when you made your first silly statement that meant no sense; because women aren't judges or what?

Take your advice and shove it in your asshole.

Whatever you thought I meant is your assumption, if you don't understand what a person meant, you ask for clarity.

Your last statement just exposed your pitiable level of intelligence.

Horrible and hate-filled cesspit souls like you don't deserve a place in the society. You should be in yaba-left.

I can't ague further with you, keep of. But if you wish to get into muddy waters I will help you get there much faster.

Slikbae:
And people blame women for hating men when no single day goes by without rape and violence from men.

If it is not a man raping his own daughter to death, it is a cousin or uncle.

What's worse is that we neglect these heinous acts while insulting and denigrating women in daily basis for being slay Queens as if that is the problem of this nation.

You need men to get justice for those crimes, keep that in mind.

You also need to understand the concept of individuality, you can't blame all for the crime of one.

It's very important for one to keep their reasoning abilities above their emotions at all times. TRY

thorpido:
You are writing in English.Hebrew is not the only language.
Translations are in order.

Corresponding translations of a language in other languages is very understandable, but a person's name is Sacrosanct. Their shouldn't be any room for ambiguity, especially due to translation.

A person's name has to be treated as Sacrosanct.

WetinConsignMe:


I don't know that there is a hell as we understand it. But if there is, then it is also part of God's plan

What about the terrorists, are they part of God's plan too?

thorpido:
There could be many 'J man'.It could be Joseph J man,Jerry J man or Johnson J man.
Even though the J man is supposed to refer to Jesus,in the spiritual world,there's confusion about which J.That's the problem with slangs.

But that shouldn't be a problem since we all know the "who" it's intended for. These day's many people also bear the name Jesus as well, so that ambiguity also applies to it somehow as well.

Isn't it better to stick to a person's Original name in the language that it was given rather than leaving it open to all kinds of translations?


If Segun travel's to the U.K, his name should continue to be what it is, Segun, not to be converted to the English translated version "Victor".

Its it better?

WetinConsignMe:

No need. We r living out the mind of God and His intentions

So if we're living out his intentions, then why is there hell?
Are those who will end up in hell also his intentions?
Are terrorists also living out his intentions?

thorpido:
Bros J apllies to Jesus in the context in which they call it but it's a slang.

Alright I agree that it's a slang, but given the context it's still acceptable to god, right? And equally as powerful as Jesus, right?

How about some of my friends who like to refer to Jesus as "J man", is this also okay? considering the context?