₦airaland Forum

manny4life: Bros, why won't I be tired? Arguing aimlessly with a retard, even three people called out your foolishness, you can't blame yourself but me for coming to your retardd level?

Again

[size=16pt]LET NAIRALNDERS BE THE JUDGE OF WHO'S CLUELESS. EKO, GET A FRIGGIN EDUCATION[/size]

It would be a matter of time, they will call your a$$ out again.. lls

manny4life:


how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group


The role of the CAA’s Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) is to ensure that UK civil aviation standards are set and achieved in a co-operative and cost-effective manner. The CAA must satisfy itself that aircraft are properly designed, manufactured, operated and maintained; that airlines are competent; that flight crews, air traffic controllers and aircraft maintenance engineers are fit and competent that licensed aerodromes are safe to use and that air traffic services and general aviation activities meet required safety standards.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=2348&pageid=798

President Goodluck Jonathan on Monday in Abuja unveiled a memorial cenotaph to mark the first anniversary of the Dana plane crash with an assurance to make the Nigeria airspace safe.

In an emotion-laden speech in memory of all the 153 passengers that died in the crash and those on ground, Jonathan said Nigeria would continue to mourn all who lost their lives in the accident.


- See more at: http://leadership.ng/news/030613/jonathan-unveils-memorial-cenotaph-dana-crash-victims#sthash.Y4eAFJDV.dpuf

manny4life: [size=20pt]LET NAIRALNDERS BE THE JUDGE OF WHO'S CLUELESS. EKO, GET A FRIGGIN EDUCATION[/size]

manny4life: [s]Keep exposing yourself, SARG is a structural unit under CAA, it doesn't answer the question of how CAA defines Airspace safety or their scope of operations. Under SARG

Specific responsibilities include:

Commercial Aviation
General Aviation
Harmonising European Standards
Flight Operations
CAA Support to Government
Passenger Safety
UK Register of Civil Aircraft
Aircraft Maintenance
Structures, Materials & Propulsion
Aircraft Airworthiness
Aircraft Design & Manufacturing
Flight Crew Licensing
Medicals
Human Factors
Air Traffic Control Services
Aerodrome Licensing & Inspections
Incident Reporting
Research
International Consultancy & Training Services

Specific responsibilities include:

Airspace Regulation
Airspace Utilisation
Aeronautical Information Management Regulation
Coordination and Consultation
Environmental Research Consultancy
European ATM Policy Coordination
Meteorology
Surveillance and Spectrum Management

Again, according to the bold, how does SARG explain what airspace or its safety is?[/s]

manny4life:


how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group


The role of the CAA’s Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) is to ensure that UK civil aviation standards are set and achieved in a co-operative and cost-effective manner. The CAA must satisfy itself that aircraft are properly designed, manufactured, operated and maintained; that airlines are competent; that flight crews, air traffic controllers and aircraft maintenance engineers are fit and competent that licensed aerodromes are safe to use and that air traffic services and general aviation activities meet required safety standards.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=2348&pageid=798

manny4life: [s]
Eko the person,

Again, read carefully because you're getting swarmed and overwhelmed.

I said



here is what they said -
The planning and regulation of all UK airspace, including the navigation and communications infrastructure to support safe and efficient operations. http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=7&pagetype=90[/s]

manny4life:


how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety ..

manny4life: Now , how about you check on FAA, CAA, ICAO, and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group


The role of the CAA’s Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) is to ensure that UK civil aviation standards are set and achieved in a co-operative and cost-effective manner. The CAA must satisfy itself that aircraft are properly designed, manufactured, operated and maintained; that airlines are competent; that flight crews, air traffic controllers and aircraft maintenance engineers are fit and competent that licensed aerodromes are safe to use and that air traffic services and general aviation activities meet required safety standards.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=2348&pageid=798

manny4life: Again, CAA's scope of Airspace


The planning and regulation of all UK airspace, including the navigation and communications infrastructure to [size=16pt]support safe and efficient [/size] operations.

manny4life:


how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

manny4life: how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group


The role of the CAA’s Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) is to ensure that UK civil aviation standards are set and achieved in a co-operative and cost-effective manner. The CAA must satisfy itself that aircraft are properly designed, manufactured, operated and maintained; that airlines are competent; that flight crews, air traffic controllers and aircraft maintenance engineers are fit and competent that licensed aerodromes are safe to use and that air traffic services and general aviation activities meet required safety standards.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=2348&pageid=798

manny4life: Oh btw, airspace safety was discussed because you asked the question above, and below was your response

manny4life: Oh btw, from the same CAA website, here


[size=16pt]
Here is CAA's definition of Airspace

The planning and regulation of all UK airspace, including the navigation and communications infrastructure to support safe and efficient operations. http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=7&pagetype=90[/size]

Then again, I swore not to respond to you. Get an education.

manny4life: how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Katsumoto: Clearly you are the one lacking comprehension.

First, the work is being done by the Gates foundation and its partners. Read the bolded part again. If Jonathan was able to reduce the incidence of Polio through its own agents then perhaps he might be praised.

Second, having the president's support is not the same thing as Gates praising Jonathan's performance.

Third, praising the president's performance reads as Gates praising Jonathans's overall performance. Is that the case here? Gates is talking about the work he is doing and mentions that Goodluck's support as been useful. He neither praises Jonathan's overall performance nor does he praise Jonathan for the work he (Gates) is doing.

Why didn't Soyinka's father or mother accept the Nobel prize on his part? Afterall, they supported him in his journey.

What exactly did Jonathan do that he is being praised for? No where is Jonathan praised in that article.

manny4life: how about you check on CAA and all other agencies and see what constitutes airspace safety..

Safety and Airspace Regulation Group


The role of the CAA’s Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG) is to ensure that UK civil aviation standards are set and achieved in a co-operative and cost-effective manner. The CAA must satisfy itself that aircraft are properly designed, manufactured, operated and maintained; that airlines are competent; that flight crews, air traffic controllers and aircraft maintenance engineers are fit and competent that licensed aerodromes are safe to use and that air traffic services and general aviation activities meet required safety standards.

http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=2348&pageid=798

manny4life: [s]
Your foolishness knows no boundary, did the DANA crash involve bad weather? NO. Did it involve bad flight pattern? NO. Did it involve wrongful pattern approach? NO. Was there midair collision? NO. Your stupidity is alarming, go back and read what "AIRSPACE SAFETY" is, Nigerian airspace safety is 1,000% safe.

From the cockpit recording, when the pilot called out may-day, I was please to know that Radar approach held ALL traffic - ingoing and outgoing, kept following up with them and guiding them with instructions on everything possible till the last minutes where they were less than 5miles away to the runway. If we had poor airspace monitoring equipments, how do you think that would have been possible?

Rather than you blaming their maintenance program, you're blaming the airspace. Pickup an aviation textbook and read up what is "AVIATION SAFETY", because your clueless on what an airspace is let alone it's definition. I'm done with you, deuces..[/s]

Jonathan remembers Dana Air crash victims, vows to make Nigeria airspace safe



Remembering the 153 Dana Airline passengers who lost their lives last year, the president vowed to leave no stone unturned towards making Nigeria airspace safe and warned that maximum vigilance should be kept by all stakeholders in the industry in order to prevent reoccurrence.



http://www.worldstagegroup.com/worldstagenew/index.php?active=news&newscid=8895&catid=27

akpanoka: When u see a staged managed picture or video, u will know.
One, where he is isn't a Gym, that bicycle was brought to d parlour for that purpose: hoodwink us into believing he is ok

2. In a gym, hee is supposed to be wwearing a Canvass. Abi him no get? And a joggers to save us that alleged parkinson infested legs

3. Why is he trying to hard to prove he is ok when he can easily come home and add to d 36 billion naira owambe things as Fashola is estimating?

manny4life: Yes, our airspace is 1,000% SAFE.

Pangea: Mr. President!
What were you elected to do?
Wait on Obama to come and do your work for you?
Smh
I tire for these people o!

manny4life: Is this your new line of attack?

You can't defend your gaffe so you resort to say something I never said or even stand for?

My first post called for them to be disciplined, and even went further to state that govt needs to enforce strict measures, however, I dislike it when unintelligent folks like you sell wrong and false information to people. Losing an engine does NOT constitute an "airspace safety" regardless of how many times it occurs. That is why they have ETOPS operations to absolve these kinds of issues thus making it OKAY to operate on one engine, and perfectly SAFE.

manny4life: (though I do not support this)

manny4life:
Maintenance issues doesn't constitute airspace safety.

manny4life: Lol

Answer the question na, you're asking me serious dumb question...

Nah, I crowned you NL certified fuctardious troll, REMEMBER?

manny4life: [s]
Lol... what a lazy thought, so because Southwest Airlines had two accidents - one runway incursion and another involving collision in less than 6months, I guess that makes them A VERY BAD AIRLINE... LOL.

I doubt you even understand what airspace safety, a lot of you guys speak on shitt you know nothing about... Engine malfunctioning does not constitute an airspace safety, but a maintenance and general safety issue. Airspace safety like I explained is for instance using ETOPS, or spacing aircraft according to their flight pattern, routes, approach, etc.[/s]

manny4life: Here is the same question for you, YES OR NO


Was the plane in question mandated to fly with two or more engines?


Does losing one engine raise "AIRSPACE safety concerns?

manny4life: Lol, did you say answer your question, you have to first answer based on your FALSE and mumu assertion. See below

Here is the question for you

[size=16pt]HOW DOES AN AIRCRAFT LOSING ONE ENGINE CONSTITUTE AN AIRSPACE SAFETY HAZARD OR CONCERN?[/size[

manny4life: [s]
Lol, you have learned and now you're changing your mouth ... What a DUMB question, asking like I'm their flight crew. Like duh, after schooling you, you're still asking foolishh questions, most heavy Jets are ETOPS certified, thus the reason why the airplane flew for about 20mins without diverting and landed in Abuja. There's no mandatory law that says an aircraft must fly with both engines, a B747 has four engines but in cruise flight, to save on fuel, pilots turn off two engines, ..So it's not longer "airspace" safety, but now "general" safety? Smh @ you, you need help. Lest you forget, your emphasis was on " AIRSPACE SAFETY", you're not going off easy on this one, I have explained two times, it's your turn to answer...Again

[size=16pt]HOW DOES AN AIRCRAFT LOSING ONE ENGINE CONSTITUTE AN AIRSPACE SAFETY HAZARD OR CONCERN?[/size][/s]

manny4life: [s]Lol, you're a fvcking idiota, AGAIN, how does an airplane flying with one engine constitute "airspace safety"? How does losing one engine constitute an airspace hazard? Your mumu-ness has reached another level, your foolishness knows no bounds. Stop exposing your ignorance everywhere, an example of airspace safety is minimum aircraft separation, OR the Extended Range Twin Operations (known as ETOPs). Contrary to you safety hazard BS, airliners that are ETOPS certified can operate up to 180mins (3hrs) to the nearest airport, meaning that it meets the guidelines for safe operation ON ONE ENGINE... Before you infect us with your mugu-ness, learn to think before you talk[/s].

manny4life: [s]
If I call you ewu now, they will say Manny has started, what has the news got to do with airspace safety? When your cars and trucks are faulty or breakdown on the road, does that imply that the roads are bad or unsafe? In fact, I will call you ewu Gambia. At least we have an empathetic president, and he won't be the first president to shed tears after such a mishap, so deal with it.[/s]