₦airaland Forum

claremont:
You are saying that the effective range is 3.6km?! The M4 hasn't got an effective range of even 1km, which is why I asked if you know what you are saying?! In a previous life, I was in the military, so I should know a bit of this really. I'm guessing that after a few years of my exit, weapon systems designed for an effective range of 500m have automatically acquired an effective range of 3.6km? I'm not very conversant with the American military weapon systems, but I know damn well that the bog-standard military rifle has an effective range of no more than 500m.

An AR 15 doesn't have a 3.6km effective range. I would say about 700 meters but that depends on the grains used in the caliber. That changes the velocity and ballistics. Most ammo vendors provide such info on their website. I have friends that have consistently hit targets at 800 meters with an AR 15.

Then there is the .338 Lapua's which goes about 1500 meters and a .50 calibre which goes over a mile. There is a new calibre that can hit close to 2 miles. As technology improves, so does killing machines

claremont:
Do you know what you are saying?!

I believe he is saying an AR15 is more accurate than an AK 47. Do you disagree?

Kaycee625:
Lies!!! Ak 47 effective range is 200m, maximum range is 500m
Tavour has effective range of 1km,maximum range 1.5km,dats the new guns the military is using against boko haram

Catapult has effective range of 200 meters as well, that doesn't mean it is accurate. For example, if you point an AK 74 at a person standing at the end of a 200 meters field, you most likely won't be able to hit them. So, it can have an effective range of 10,000 meters, it doesn't help if you can't hit the target

claremont:
This is incorrect. There is no military school that teaches people that the accuracy of the AK-47 is 100 yards, neither can the shotgun be effective for 300-400 yards like you said. I don't think you know anything about weapons, I'm keen to know where you read up these statistics from?

Have you shot an AK 47 at 150 yards before? If yes, can you produce the results?

yjgm:
AK47 effective range is 400m not 100 pls. Correct that assertion

Which one be effective? The guys is talking about accuracy. The reason is simple, the AK47 is made up of very few simple metal parts. It is very easy to assemble and disassemble. Because of these simple metal parts, it loses accuracy with recoil and it's harmonics are disturbed when it rides the railings and hit the back of the rifle.

Also, the hand rail is mostly made of wood which affects it during the heat and even in winter. Same reason it is harder for your door to open during the dry season and summer.

If the argument was that it is durable, then yes - the AK 47 is simple, durable and reliable simply because it has fewer parts. It has a decent calibre in the 7.62 by 39 which can pass through concrete blocks at close range. However, it is not an accurate weapon. The AR15 platform is a much better accurate weapon.

Simple put, I would prefer my enemies all have AK 47 at a long distance fight. At close quarters, they are deadly

planetx:
Name any other country in the world where you can walk into a gun store and buy a semi auto rifle talk less of a pistol.

1. Switzerland
2. Mexico
3. Bolivia
4. Austria
5. Guatemala

More closer to home is Liberia who's constitution closely resembles that of the United States

planetx:
Only someone that doesn't know the amount of damage done in a country like the US where almost every Tom dick and harry owns a gun will be advocating that sort of madness in Nigeria. I see people exchanging hot words on the streets of Lagos on a daily basis and you want to put firearms in that equation ? All we need is to empower the police and make them effective, American gun culture is nothing to emulate.

If you listen to liberal leftist leaning news, then yes - guns are problems in America. I guess so are cars, which kill more people than guns and even alcohol which does more damage than both. If you want to understand the culture and nature of guns in America, read it's constitution.

InvertedHammer:
/
Buy the parts and retrofit to your specs. The most important part is the receiver. Get a barrel that can handle 7.62 x 39mm ammo. And you are good to go.
\

Buy the parts where? He is better off making one from scratch.

Jakumo:
This write up is a fascinating work of fiction that is totally incorrect, from the standpoint of ballistic reality. Clearly the writer of this factually erroneous description has never owned a real gun in his life, but hopes to impress similarly unenlightened readers by baffling them with bullchit accumulated from playing video games and watching old war movies.

A pump action SHOTGUN unleashes a horrific flesh-mangling blast at point-blank ranges within 20 yards, BUT, those pellets only possess a MAXIMUM lethal range of 50 yards at best. Any target beyond 50 yards that is hit by shotgun pellets has a very good chance of escaping with small pellet wounds, and at ranges beyond 100 yards, shotgun pellets may not even retain sufficient energy to penetrate clothing. As a hunter who has used a pump action shotgun to down quarry ranging from fast-flying birds to sprinting deer, I happen to know what I am talking about, from personal experience over many, many years.

A rifle projectile, on the other hand, is capable of blasting gaping holes in flesh, and shattering bone, all the way out to 1 kilometer downrange, depending on the caliber of the projectile fired. The venerable AK47, chambered with the 7.62x39mm cartridge, is a devastating weapon capable of precision fire out to ranges in the region of 80 yards, beyond which accuracy drops off significantly, unless of course the rifle is fitted with a telescopic sight that improves accuracy, such that 200 yard shots can be attempted by steady-handed shooters. My .308 caliber deer rifle, fitted with a high magnification telescopic sight, will make clean deer kills well out beyond 350 yards, when fired from a stable resting position.

Having thoroughly tested the accuracy of an AK47 rifle at the firing range where many crates of ammo were expended at paper targets, I can lay claim to a very deep familiarity with the AK, going beyond mere shooting, and into the realm of complete disassembly and reassembly, which I perform blindfolded with ease, meaning that my observations about this weapon ALSO derive from EXTENSIVE hands-on experience, and not wild, uninformed speculation.

Before taking to the internet to make outlandish claims about subjects one does not truly understand, it would be prudent to bear in mind that not everyone in the targeted audience is guaranteed to be as profoundly ignorant as the pontificating writer.

Slugs with longer shotgun barrels will go well beyond 50 yards with lethal effects. It most likely will kill anything within a hundred yards. I have shot federal one ounce slugs with a smooth bore shotgun over 100 yards with very good results. Others have claimed good results over 200 yards hitting their targets. I am not a shotgun fan but they are pretty deadly with slugs over 100 yards. I turkey, boar and dear hunt all year round so that is my two cents

These are good videos breaking down shotgun shells over different distances:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNTyCcip-ks

xendra:
OK after explaining how, is there even a place in Nigeria where shooters and wannabes go to learn. legally I mean.

None that I know of

GBTYO:
A shotgun having more effective range than an assault rifle?

An AK has an effective range of 800m. That means it can kill you at 800m.

Shotgun is meant for close quarters and has a much lower effective range.

Other than buck shots, cartridge shells have very limited damage from 20yards.

Guy delete this nonsense now.

He was trying to say the AK is not an accurate weapon in a gun fight at long distances. Yes, it was kill at 800 meters but the general wood stock and lack of scoping accessories makes it a poor range shooting weapon. It has to be heavily customized for hit anything over 200 meters accurately. However, the 7.62 X 39 calibre is very effective in combat.

brocab:
This is the one question you won't receive from a JW-many of us have asked-in all different ways-do they believe in Christ well enough to accept Him-No is the Answer. JW's don't worship Jesus.

Their publications prior to 1954 confirm that they worshiped Him. I know they changed their doctrine now and claim they don't worship Him but then it conflicts with what JW believes.

CANTICLES

But when all things will have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also subject himself to the One who subjected all things to him, that God may be all things to everyone" 1 cor 15:28

It is a simple question isn't it. Is Jesus a lesser god than Jehovah?

did I mention Abraham in my post?

Cha - you were referring to God Himself going to minister to who-so-ever and you gave an example of Moses. I had raised the question earlier about why Jesus; why did God bring Jesus in the picture if He is everything and can do everything Himself. You then gave an example of God sending Moses as He sent Jesus. I then went ahead to give example about God ministering Himself in Genesis to Abraham showing that God can go Himself as He had done in the past.

So, stop deflecting the question - why Jesus? If God is the creator, why did He create the everything through Jesus and by Jesus? Why? Why did Jesus claim that He was God? Why Jesus, that is my question Bros. Please do justice and answer the question and stop running away.

don't forget that God send moses as the God of pharaoh, why bring in moses if he can do everything Himself ? ask that too

Malu - moses was a man; Moses didn't create the universe, moses isn't and wasn't the WORD. God didn't tell angels to worship Moses. God didn't call moses God. All those attributes are only related to Jesus. Hence the reason I asked you why Jesus. If you don't have an answer, please say so and stop ranting

John 4:23 True worshippers will worship the Father

Since you want to play pretend, let me quote your own JW publications:

Russell taught that we should worship Jesus and the initial Watchtower Charter's specified that establishment of the Watchtower Society was to promote the worship of Jehovah and Jesus. Yet since the 1950's, worshipping Jesus became regarded as wrongful idolatry. Russell promoted the worship of Jesus and prayer to him because he is our God.

"It seems clear that His Divinity was retained in humanity because He repeatedly spoke of Himself as having come down from heaven, and because He, though passing through trial and sorrow as a man, was yet possessed of the authority and exercised the prerogatives of a God. He was the object of unreproved worship even when a babe, by the wise men who came to see the new-born King. Matt. 2:2-11. Even the angels delighted to do Him honor. "When He bringeth the first-begotten into the world, He saith, "And let all the angels of God worship Him." Heb. 1:6. He never reproved any one for acts of worship offered to Himself, but when Cornelius offered such service to Peter--the leading apostle-- "he took him up, saying, stand up; I myself also am a man." .... Had Christ not been more than a man the same reason would have prevented from receiving worship...." Zion's Watch Tower 1880 Oct pp.2-3

And again:

"Question. The fact that our Lord received worship is claimed by some to be an evidence that while on earth he was God the Father disguised in a body of flesh and not really a man. Was he really worshiped, or is the translation faulty? Answer. Yes, we believe our Lord Jesus while on earth was really worshiped, and properly so. It was proper for our Lord to receive worship in view of his having been the only begotten of the Father and his agent in the creation of all things, including man." Zion's Watch Tower 1898 Jul 15 p.216

Rutherford continued:

"Jehovah God commands all to worship Christ Jesus because Christ Jesus is the express image of his Father, Jehovah, and because he is the Executive Officer of Jehovah always carrying out Jehovah's purpose (Heb.:3-6)." Watchtower 1939 Nov 15 p.339

Some more for you:

"Now, at Christ's coming to reign as king in Jehovah's capital organization Zion, to bring in a righteous new world, Jehovah makes him infinitely higher than the godly angels or messengers and accordingly commands them to worship him. Since Jehovah God now reigns as King by means of his capital organization Zion, then whosoever would worship Him must also worship and bow down to Jehovah's Chief One in that capital organization, namely, Christ Jesus, his Co-regent on the throne of The Theocracy." Watchtower 1945 Oct 15 p.313

There are many many more publications before 1950's where JW doctrine stated clearly that Jehovah and Jesus should be worshiped. I tried to ask you if it was true and you ignored me. So I am asking again, from the watch-tower magazines and articles; did JW worship Jesus at any time?

Not only that, the Bible is clear:

Matthew 14:2-33:

25 And in the fourth watch of the night Jesus went unto them, walking on the sea.
26 And when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear.
27 But straightway Jesus spake unto them, saying, Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid.
28 And Peter answered him and said, Lord, if it be thou, bid me come unto thee on the water.
29 And he said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the ship, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus.
30 But when he saw the wind boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried, saying, Lord, save me.
31 And immediately Jesus stretched forth his hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?
32 And when they were come into the ship, the wind ceased.
33 Then they that were in the ship came and worshiped him, saying, Of a truth thou art the Son of God.

Again, I will ask, do JW worship Jesus?

CANTICLES

the scriptural point is clear, Jesus is not called the creator. now, you switch to excuses

I am following your line of thought, if Jesus is not the creator then he is a lesser god than Almighty God, is that right?

if God alone is Supreme and Almighty, why send moses as a God to pharaoh, why not go himself ?

Didn't God appear Himself to Abraham in Genesis 18:1, 12:7, 17:1–3, 22) . The text is clear that God Himself appeared to Abraham and spoke with him. Can you explain this?

you are asking a baseless, sentimental , irrational question. Hebrews 1:2 says God made the universe through his son . stick with that !

It is not baseless and irrational, it is simply using your own logic. Why bring in Jesus if God can do everything Himself?

Jehovah's Witnesses worship only the person Jesus worships , do u know him ?

That is not true - in John 1:1, JW claims the WORD is a god?. In John 1:3 = JW claims that everything that exist, made and created was created by this "a god".

Again, it's the uneducated and uninformed that you can deceive. JW history teaches from your texts and archives that you worshiped Jesus and your history clearly stated so. In the 50's, you guys changed doctrine on worshiping Jesus. So the facts are clear, you worship God and you worship Jesus which is guys call "a god". Are you denying these facts?

Jozzy4:
for by him ..... that statement reveal he is NOT THE SOURCE but medium through which all things are created . only the source reserves the title of a CREATOR . Again JESUS IS NEVER CALLED CREATOR , HE himself acknowledge the FATHER AS CREATOR ( MATT 19:4-6)

Okay, so there are 2 Gods, one is Jehovah and one is Jesus by your description. God is the creator and Jesus is the master maker. Is God alone is supreme and Almighty, why create EVERYTHING through Jesus - why bring in Jesus in the first place?

Why does JW worship two Gods then?

Jozzy4:
for by him ..... that statement reveal he is NOT THE SOURCE but medium through which all things are created . only the source reserves the title of a CREATOR . Again JESUS IS NEVER CALLED CREATOR , HE himself acknowledge the FATHER AS CREATOR ( MATT 19:4-6)

Dude, I am not going to argue with you. You can selectively decide to use interpretation one place if it's fit your heretical views and deny it elsewhere.

We know that BMW make cars. We know that Apple Computers makes ipads, we know that Microsoft makes the Xbox. These products are "made by" these manufacturers. In the same way - these products are created by these manufacturers. So, selectively choosing words and giving them implied meaning shows the true nature of JW.

John 1:10 made it clear. Romans 11:36 even clearer but heretics and cults no matter now much they mix truth with lies have one thing in common - they deny the deity of Jesus Christ.

So let me ask this question - how many God/gods do you believe in and do you worship?

Jozzy4:
for by him ..... that statement reveal he is NOT THE SOURCE but medium through which all things are created . only the source reserves the title of a CREATOR . Again JESUS IS NEVER CALLED CREATOR , HE himself acknowledge the FATHER AS CREATOR ( MATT 19:4-6)

Jesus help us . How do you reconcile this verse:

John 1:3 = ALL things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Remember, we agreed that made and create are the same . This is stating that Jesus MADE/CREATE EVERYTHING. It said "WITHOUT JESUS"; there will be no creation. Can you use your JW doctrine to lawyer your way through this one? .

Heretics!

Jozzy4:
JESUS is never called "Creator" Bro.

So it's down to English and Semantics now abi? So, Jesus can create the whole universe and everything in it but because He wasn't called the Creator means He is not the Creator of what He created. Here we go again:

Colossians 1:16 = For by him were ALL THINGS CREATED, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

From the above scripture, did Jesus everything?

mbhs139:
If you're an erudite scholar, like you want be to believe, I think you should know that the bold part is more of political and economic than religion, believe me. Even the issue of the Shia and Sunnies, right from inception, as far as I'm concerned, is more of political, it was a battle of leadership - who takes over the leadership of the Humma after the death of the Prophet? In any case, I think one finds it difficult defending the actions of my northern brothers in faith. You can hardly hear of something like this in the south.

If you understand Islam, you will understand that there is no division between politics and religion in Islam. The Sharia is a typical example, Sharia legislate every single aspect of muslim life down to how one have sex. Policies are defined by the Koran and the Sunnah of prophet Mohammad and not by civil law. Places like Saudi or Iran are states based on Sharia.

Regarding why it happens more in the North than in the South is question of Sharia. Sharia is implemented in the north than in the south. So, it is not an economics problem. Saudi is a very reach country and so are other countries that implement Sharia. The south of Nigeria is also not without such issues - if you want to see them, I have multiple cases

Jozzy4:
NO , infact Christ Jesus acknowledge Jehovah God HIS FATHER as The Creator {mat 19:4~6, Mark 13:19}

You are claiming Creator and maker are different here but in explaining the meaning of the Greek word of CREATE, you said that CREATE and MADE are the same.

In Hebrews 1:2: God the Father acknowledges it was through God the Son that the universe was created. In John 1:3, John confirmed that God the Son is the maker and creator of ALL things.

You can't selectively choose CREATOR means something one place and MAKER doesn't or CREATE and MADE are not the same when you defended it was the same elsewhere.

If that is not clear, read Colossians 1;16 = For by him were ALL THINGS CREATED, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

Can you please explain how God is the creator and Jesus is also the creator?

Slitman:
Just have it at the back of your mind that two wrongs can't make a right . The kind of remarks your Christain brothers have been giving on this issues ain't encouraging at all . .
What i wan't you to know is Islam is a religion of peace . Anyone that goes beyond practicing the religion peacefully should never be termed as a Muslim. It hurts me when people generalize insults on all Muslims . The remarks i have been getting from the Christian folks ain't encouraging at all

Now you are sounding biased. I tend not to engage people that are not objective. Bros - you don't have to tell me about Islam; I know Islam. I agree Islam is a religion of peace but you also have to agree that it is also jihad. If you deny that, then we shouldn't engage in this discussion anymore. Not only that, Islam is dualistic in nature - it has one set of laws for muslims and others for non muslims. It divides the world into two house-holds; I am sure you know what I mean.

I learned Islam from the Koran, the Hadith, the Sunnah and Siri of prophet Mohammad. While I can say it was at times peaceful, it has multiple teachings that is causing the killings of Shias against Sunnis and vice versa. Look at Syria, look at Iraq, look at Thailand, look at the Middle East. But most importantly, look at the life and teachings of prophet Mohammed; it will tell you all about Islam

Slitman:
By the way you also sounded as if the whole scenario happened right before your very eyes . Hmmm

My aunt lives in Kano and she is a member of the Deeper Life Bible church the deceased wife husband preach at. This was the husband testimony. The husband was there when his wife was murdered so he has no reason to lie or tell tales.

The facts are simple. A non muslim woman was murdered because it was claimed that she "blasphemed" Islam prophet. While I wouldn't want to get into Islamic theology, it is a standing Islamic jurisprudence for both Sunni and Shia that blaspheming Islam prophet carries the capital punishment which is in most cases death. Kano is a Sharia state, perhaps not under Federal law but it is still is.

Slitman:
I will only applause and understand your grievance if only you jump into the street with a banner campaigning for the ill fated slain woman . Don't hide under your bed and talk like a lion . Take your protest to the street . Mind you I don't support the killing of the innocent woman in any way irrespective of what ever she must have said about our humble prophet . Those people that perpetrated the evil against that woman can only be classified as pure illiterate . And i think they should be made to face the full wrath of their unguided action in court of law . from what the president has said . . He only said that for future reference. Hence We ought to learn how to respect other people faith . You know the chaos would have been avoided if only the woman and her murderers had listen to the Quranic and Biblical quotations about love . . . If Your Bible guided you to love your neighbour as yourself and my Quran also instructed us to love other people according to how we love ourselves. Then why are we still not at peace with ourselves . Don't you think that make us an unbeliever ? Since most of us has choose to succumbed to the voice of the devil, rather than the peaceful way of the holy books?

Dude - where you there? Did you hear the woman "insult" your prophet? The lady asked the muslim man after his prayer in the future to please not use the front of her shop so it will not affect her business - that was all she said. The people who didn't know the meaning of peace here where the "illiterates" as you call them and they are on your side of the fence.

Taking my protest to the street will not stop the "blaspheming" laws in the mainly sharia north of Nigeria. Today it might be a 70 year old woman, years ago it was a Yoruba teacher who was murdered because a muslim student was cheating and used the Koran to hide his cheat-paper, when the lady went to take the paper, the student claimed an "infidel" touched the Koran and she was lynched. Perhaps you should do well to teach the "illiterates" as you call them the "peace" you are talking about.

My Bible guides me to love and that is why we don't don't murder anyone for "blaspheming" Jesus Christ, something the Islamic world can learn from. It is not me to preach peace to Muslims, that is why you have your Imams and Mullahs. My approach is simple - be tough with tough people and soft with soft people.

Jozzy4:
Hahahaha, when something is Made is it not created ?

Ignorance of the highest order , the translator use Made whereas the greek word ekitse means create . grow up lol

Good point - JW claim Jehovah is the creator and Jesus is the master maker: Are they both the same thing to you guys. I am not asking if Jehovah allowed Jesus or gave Him the power to do whatever. I am asking is the Creator and the Master Maker the same?

CAPTIVATOR:
So how does this mean he knew the hour of the end ? He said authority not that he knew the time of the end , so just admit he doesnt know


Besides, how can the Almighty God be given authority ?

Cha - Textual interpretation is hard for some people. Typical example:

In John 10:9 = I am the DOOR. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture. Was Jesus referring to a physical door that you have in your home or office?

CAPTIVATOR:
U are saying shit

No problem Boss. Can you explain what Jesus meant when He said ALL authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me - what does that mean?

CAPTIVATOR:
Your doctrine is shit ... Only the Father knows ( Scripture )

That is the problem isn't it . That is why you have your own bible that denies the deity of Jesus Christ and have gone to great lengths to do so. I guess God's word is poo to you.

CAPTIVATOR:
The greek ekitse means what ?

So you are a greek scholar now? . I can send you over a greek letter I have had for years and if you will be kind to interpret it for me; I will be happy to indulge you. It's the same way, you guys interpret John 1:1 - talking about the definite article; as if any of you can read greek.

The earliest sources and manuscripts we have today that is online is the Codex Sinaiticus. You can actually go online and read it in Greek and it's translation in English and it's very very very clear: http://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=36&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0

If you will like for me to give you my Greek letter to translate and interpret, let me know

CAPTIVATOR:
Jesus is the beginning of Gods creation - Rev3:14

The Father is the source of all creation not Jesu , dont u read 1 cor 8:6 " the Father , FROM WHOM ALL THINGS ARE " !!!

Why didn't you finish reading the whole verse: "Yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist"

Can you please tell me the difference there? . Your doctrine of creator and master maker is what is confusing you. Jesus Christ created/made everything; the Bible has made that clear in John 1:3. You heretics deny John 1:1 so I don't want to debate you on that

Some more education for you. Jesus is known as our everlasting Father in the Bible.

Isaiah 9:6: For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace

Here Jesus is called Everlasting Father. While I am not claiming Jesus is Jehovah, Jesus is God. Please read

John 1:3 = Through him ALL things were made; without him NOTHING was made that has been made.. As if that is not enough, read Hebrews 1:3 as well.

You are the same idiots that claim Jesus is Michael and Michael is Jesus when the Bible made it VERY clear that Jesus is not an angel. But NO - your publishers who don't publish their names for us to critic them and debate them drills your brain with such stupidity.

I guess Proverbs 8:5 was written for a reason

CAPTIVATOR:
Jesus is the beginning of Gods creation - Rev3:14

The Father is the source of all creation not Jesu , dont u read 1 cor 8:6 " the Father , FROM WHOM ALL THINGS ARE " !!!

Read John 1:3 please. Can't continue to argue with you

shogotermies:
Am a Christian, but I still respect all other religion either Islam,Judaism,Buddhism etc
because they all call on God and he answers them so why should I insult others belief,. And when u insult other religion who are you to fight for God who r you to condemn a religion.

I repeat!! am from a Christian home but I know how to recite little Arabic verses, am not optimistic am not foolish,, God made all religion on purpose.

I still look at some poo on nairaland making ridicule of islam,hmm take note on the judgement day God will deal with you.

As for buhari, never expected nothing more than that he is an ex militant so they don't give a fork.

For the love of God, how did this woman "disrespected" the murderers faith oh?

Slitman:
Your unnecessary and constant hate on the president is a life time disease . Only God can safe you . . . . What is wrong for a president to educate his subjects on respect peoples faith irrespective of who or what they are ?

Who "disrespected" who's faith that it caused a brutal murder of an innocent woman?