₦airaland Forum

armyofone:
Ginni shouldn't have gotten herself involved - knowing her husband's position.
Thank goodness all involved weren't able to turn the country into third world.

My point exactly.

budaatum:
Good thing America has more than one Supreme Court Judge.

"In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections".

And basedusername wants us to believe that Ginni and her husband don't talk about these issues so it cannot reflect on him when he has been giving rulings like this another is the National archives ruling where he was the lone dissenters this January.

If I was a conspiracy theorist I would say Clarence Thomas is faking any infection he has because this was going to be in public domain soon.

sanpipita:
Crazy if this woman ends up costing her husband his supreme Court seat, why would she involve herself in something like this I will never understand, conservatives are full of mad people

If it was a Liberal that did this conservatives would be crying by now even liberals themselves will call out the person remember the Cuomo case.

PDPGuy:
WTH?!

She admitted in an interview last week that she took part in January 6. I did not know that she was sending text messages too.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/03/14/us/politics/ginni-thomas-jan-6-rally.amp.html

What your spouse does reflects on you other justices avoided conflicts of interest like these


The least justice Thomas can do is recuse himself from J6 cases.

BasedUsername:
How does Bill Clinton sleeping with a White House intern reflect on Hillary?

It reflected on her badly reason why agent orange brought some of them to the debates and some women chose not to vote for her because of that and it was in the news.

You can argue all you want in marriage two shall become one anyway it depends on the kind of marriage and what your spouse does is reflecting on you.

Clarence Thomas is a Supreme Court justice a judge is supposed to be fair and nonpartisan and your spouse is not expected to be embarrassing you which other supreme Court justice have you heard their spouses partake in political activism I remember Justice Clark whose seat Thurgood Marshall occupied because his son was appointed AG by Lyndon B.Johnson and his father immediately resigned for Johnson to fill his seat for fear of conflict of interest and accusations of impartiality and all.

One good thing Manchin and Sinema have done so far is to confirm all of Biden's judicial nominees and this is a good thing as much as they are a mess it is the two of them including Ossoff and Warnock that gives dems the majority it needs for now hopefully it expands this midterm if not for them Moscow Mitch won't even give a hearing for any of Biden's judicial appointees.

BasedUsername:
I didn't know that crime was sexually transmitted

Lol, because their marriage is an arranged contract and under arranged contracts what your spouse does does not reflect on you lol. Am I right?

They don't have discussions right

The least he can do is to recuse himself from cases concerning J6.

The GQP was asking Judge Jackson if she would recuse herself from a Harvard case she said yes let Thomas have the decency to do same.

Read through this thread


https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1507105642401734665?t=vQND6Hd5cd4K6vwfOYsKJA&s=19


Democrats better expand their senate majority this midterms Biden maybe getting a second nominee.

Sanpipita come and see
Where is pdpguy, hapney65 and gambojimeta?

While your husband sits on the court you choose to be a politician.

gambojimeta:

Kikikikikikiki

See the latest news

https://twitter.com/SpiroAgnewGhost/status/1507100636231319562?s=19


It is a reminder that Justice Thomas was the only justice who dissented against the national archive releasing Trump's record to the January 6th committee well now we know why.

If I was a conspiracy theorist I will say that justice Thomas is not sick but in hiding but I am not.

BasedUsername:
Godspeed Clarence. A true constitutionalist who doesn't make excuses for pedos. Perfect example of black excellence or as I like to call it, excellence

Yeah a true constitutionalist whose wife tried to overthrow a constitutionally elected government while organising the J6 insurrection

LMAO

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/ginni-thomas-mark-meadows-text-messages/index.html

folake4u:
Beautiful and heartwarming pictures.

In a nutshell having a husband who will support you and be proud of you is everything.

Judge Jackson has a beautiful family and her daughter is proud of her momma.

Awwn

The Supreme Court remains silent on Justice Thomas' health he was supposed to have been released on Tuesday but he hasn't and did not participate in oral arguments this week. He has been hospitalised since Friday.




https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1507047870368784388?t=95qIJrbKXli0ceGIuUnnsA&s=19

Hopefully he recovers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqD7PNnaTmw


Aww this path moved me

Senator Booker said "Nobody's stealing my joy" what a classy and deep conversation he had with Judge Jackson I enjoyed watching it.

LMAO.

So proud of Future Justice Jackson she handled herself with class.

Former U.S Secretary of State Madeleine Albright has passed on.

Akpan107:
I should be one telling you to stop repeating the same thing...

Fotus simply means UNBORN CHILD or a DEVELOPING BABY.

Yes , even a new born baby is still developing, stop confusing yourself.

Is it a criminal act to KILL unborn baby in Nigeria,

Remember, it's a 14 years jail sentence...

I repeat just in case you did not hear it before a foetus is not a baby and does not have rights accorded to the born

Also take note that 14 years jail sentence only exist on paper making abortions illegal has not and will never stop abortions it only stops access to safe abortions and subjects women to quacks get that through your head and stop being emotional about basic facts

Akpan107:
Abortion is simply taking the life of unborn babies,

It's a criminal act to KILL.

That's why there's a 14 years jail sentence for those killers in Nigeria.

Life is sacred, we must not KILL at Will.

Thank God it's a criminal act here.

Lol stop repeating the same thing argue with something more factual don't tell me about Nigerian law that I know of.

If life was truly sacred we would not have security agencies who will have to kill people to defend others we would not have defences to murder.

A foetus is not a baby and can not be in the same category as us. Abortion is not infanticide I support a woman's rights to make decisions concerning her womb and a foetus below viability what I would not support is infanticide or late term abortions without proper medical procedure and reason.
Saying that abortion is killing unborn babies is not really a sound argument some of you think it is.

Akpan107:
You mean they should make the killing of unborn babies legal...?

Maybe other crimes should be made legal too, How about that?

They are not babies it is a foetus don't distort biology something that has not been born is not a baby neither does it breath.

Crimes are punished if someone is being harmed abortion is not harming anybody because you can simply not get to make decisions for a woman on how she should handle her body get that through your head.

sanpipita:
What they accuse Ketanji for is just standard practice even conservative judges indulge, all this noise is just usual politics of being loud and pretending to care.

We are talking about the same woman, same senate approved her nomination as federal judge just last year.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fact-check-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-child-porn/story?id=83565833

Judge Jackson is very qualified I love how she made the senators look silly see her reply to senator Kennedy when he asked her when life begins. Her response to senator Blackburn too was also sound since it was a bad faith question anyway.

https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1506436970330869764?t=07CCk04vWf2i40vDt1rKeQ&s=19

Jon Ossoff is an amazing senator I share a birthday with him.

The people of Georgia have done well electing this brilliant man

https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1506633043381006342?t=YrlWYBmhcc-q4Kqeb13uWw&s=19


Justice Thomas

Akpan107:
Like said earlier, just because some crimes go unoticed or unknown doesn't mean it's now legal....

Killing unborn babies still remain a criminal act! Nothing changed!!!

Who said anything changed about it the point is that it happens and women are subjected to practices harmful to their health so the best option is to legalise it as Benin republic did last year so that instead of women having to die from undergoing it they get qualified medical personnel to attend to them because making abortions illegal in the first place does not stop it it only stops access to safe abortions hope you get it now.

Akpan107:
You know the enforcer of the law, but you where busy asking me who will enforced it...

As I said earlier, simply because OUR system here is corrupt, doesn't mean the law has been ERASED.

Abortion is done in secret, there's no hospital that's boldly written Abortion Clinic.

The police kept arresting the killer doctors, but the corrupt system kept freeing them.

So many crimes happen in this country, and the culprits kept walking freely...

That's the corrupt system I am talk about.

All these crimes and killings won't be possible in a working system.

It is still a criminal act to KILL unborn baby, the failure of the system doesn't mean law has been ERASED.

Lol instead of pointing out how it has been enforced you could not you only validated my point that the law is moot you think it is easy to arrest someone for committing an abortion anywhere in the world lol.


Nobody is telling you to do an abortion let those with the problem deal with it themselves sometimes it is better to mind your business since you so much love children like I do contribute to getting children out of poverty and outside school instead of policing women's wombs

Akpan107:
Hahahahaha...

I was thinking you will answer my question?

Who enforced the law or jail sentence for murderer?

I don't need stories!!!

The police that is why I am asking you if you have seen the police charge any woman for abortion in Nigeria it is not common but there are reports that abortions happen in Nigeria using the back door hope you get it now?
Laws are nothing without enforcement so my point is abortion is not really a big deal in Nigeria because it happens and I am yet to see many cases apart from very old cases relating to abortions.

Understand the context and stop comparing apples to oranges in a nutshell you have no idea.

Akpan107:
Funny question, "Law exist and who is enforcing them"

Who enforced the law for jail sentence of murderers before?

Hahahahaha....

Try not to be a clown how many women have you seen in jail for getting an abortion in Nigeria you think that issues as private as that are easy to prosecute

This is the last time I will legitimise any lie pointed at Judge Jackson concerning this issue anyway the good thing is that no intelligent person is taking the republiQans serious not even conservative lawyers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/21/us/politics/judge-jackson-child-sexual-abuse-fact-check.html

benalvino3:
Point out the lie. She was the only one lying

Watch the video boy and stop going to Qanon sources to get daily lies or better still point out any truth that Cruz said that every same person has not refuted it is your type that does not know that there is a difference between Paedophilia and Child pornography cases which the judge told Durbin yesterday that not much statutes the duty of Congress to make addresses internet access to child pornography and that the sentences should not be more than necessary she quoted the statute also you are just here conflating BS about Paedophilia and Child pornography without understanding the context.

Anyway I will not respond further because you have no idea what you are talking about.

benalvino3:
She has been explaining rubbish and contradicting herself as she goes.

She did not anyway any lie you can tell yourself to sleep well at night is fine by me even conservative lawyers like Andy McCarthy on his opinion on Newsweek have all come to her defence but do go on that you know better than American lawyers and judges

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/josh-hawley-ketanji-brown-jackson-andrew-mccarthy-child-porn-meritless-1690147%3famp=1

Anyway the GQP expects not so intelligent people to believe them anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP9XKSSVV2M


Lol there is a reason why I like Elie Mystal.


Kudos to Judge Jackson for keeping her cool when the GQP were embarrassing themselves.
Even Joe Manchin did not buy Josh Hawley's lies against Judge Jackson when he was asked on Monday.

benalvino3:
Basilico a sentencing guideline of 10 years but Jackson gave only 3 months to a child predator.

Isn't that crazy... Its not just one instance but loads of instances. Shame

Ted Cruz brought out 5 cases out of the numerous cases and she clarified and explained the basis but do go on why do you leave out the part where she made RepubliQans look like fools yesterday