₦airaland Forum

armyofone:
The infection rate is going up again in China.

Hope they contain it and don't spread this one again.

They should start banning flights from China now

I cannot relive covid again

Oh no what will the GQP use to campaign against Biden now

Everyone is endorsing judge Jackson she is well qualified for SCOTUS.

I look forward to watching her confirmation hearing.

She has been confirmed by the senate three times already.

Immensely qualified for the job.

BRATISLAVA:
Why wouldn't it "crach"?

This guy is one of the most stupid controlling red pill/macho men out there. He's the type that wants to spank his wife, or destroy her face with punches when things don't go his way.

Imagine him trying to control an adult, and when it's backfired he's here with a half story. It should teach him that his red pill bros will give him accolades for oppressing a lady, but they will not share the consequences of such actions with him. That he's back to share his failures at living with the girl shows that he's looking for the support he got then to feel good about his recent actions.

His face was too hard. Later they will tell you that they cannot marryy their age mates, age shame them, because they are looking for one little girl to own and control.

If she has any sense, she will leave him for good. He's not ready to be married. Reminds us of bejaprodint and her talkative "husband".

Gbam

BRATISLAVA:
Lol.

Two months after marriage he locked her out of their house, to show her what a macho man husband he is.

Ladies are suffering so much in a bid to please men. A small girl of 22 made into a ridiculous case online, to please a hard-faced misogynist husband who seeks to control every aspect of her life.

How she married him, and why he went for her, those are two interesting things about this OP.

https://www.nairaland.com/7028893/marriage-10-months-gradually-craching/1#111047052

Latest thread I could not reply your mention then because I was banned then.

Wittyduchess:
Lol,that lady tried. 10 months .


I had to go back to your previous threads.You are petty and have the constant need for control and validation . Well good luck.

Exactly.

Wasky101:
No be u lock 2 months old bride outside overnight
When they were warning you that you will ruin your marriage u didnt listen , u enjoyed the comments from teenage boys on nairaland.
Now them don leave you behind. You had it coming

I remember oo in case OP forget

Bratislava.

Come and see

I remember when I said it last year on one of the OP's thread that marrying a younger girl of 22 when never see life nor funny..
Anyway you OP are the problem not your wife you want to discipline an adult you talk am for your previous thread.


Bratislava the wife locker is back with another thread did he not lock his wife for coming home later you think say e easy to control generation Z them

I pity the girl not you you wanted to take advantage of her naivety but na she play you.

McGg:
Hypocrisy

That Ukraine did not provoked Russia, and Russia attacked them so why did Nigeria attacked Biafra when ojukwu declared for independent

Silly question bring a better analogy next time

BRATISLAVA:
Did the women start the war? Or you want women to not only have children for numbskull men who start wars, but also fight in their wars?

What exactly are males on the forum asking for? Is that supposed to be smart? Ukraine this, Ukraine that. Did women start that war or do you want to blame them for actions of the usual bloodthirsty men?

The price of a penis and guns made for mens hands will not change overnight. Men will begin and end wars by themselves.

If you think feminism is women dying for mens wars, you will quote all the wars your bros began and women and children will still get priority while men keep playing at whataboutism while paying for it.

Don't address women being used for rituals. Keep beating around the bush while you look for how men have been hard done by whenever such topics come up.

2013 an health topic brought me to nairaland back then.

I was searching for things and it brought me here I did not register until later but I used to come on nairaland to see various opinions on different topics particularly family and relationships

baby124:
For me, anything over 5yrs is another peer group, mentality, exposure and expectations entirely.

Same

Hannover:
[s]All this small small children in Nairaland.... Sometimes I wonder how you kids reason.. Maybe with your Ass[/s]!!

You must be talking about yourself I did not ask you to tell me about you.

oldienavie:
So it is a crime for me to marry an innocent woman now, rather than marry exposed, wild women ?
Na wah o

Kobojunkie he just highlighted my point

Kobojunkie:
1. Age does not guarantee it. She explained it her write that her mental is at the same level as that of her peers and so she prefers to date someone who is her mate.

There are adults whose mental wavelength does not correspond with that of those in their age group meaning they have to look outside to find real companionship.

2. Again, Age doesn't give you a guarantee but it serves as a sort of marker as far as where to look for what you seek.

My point

Kobojunkie:
1. There is nothing childish about what she stated. It is usually best you engage someone who you are on the same mental wavelength with than with someone who you can't even be in agreement with on anything.

The primary reason why many, including those who marry their age mates, along with so many who marry those much younger end up sad and miserable is they place such things as age, and ego, above the important things like respect, equality in relationship and love.

2. If your mental wavelength at age 36, is still at 26, then you are not doing it wrong going for someone of that age. The key is you ensure you are doing so for the right reasons. Not because you are want a partner you can teach/dominate and control but instead a partner you respect and see as your equal in all-wise, this even with the age gap.

@bold and that is the reason some of them go for much younger girls because they are innocent, they are not yet exposed so they can easily manipulate and control them or another angle is that they can easily bear children very submissive and dependent on them their opinions have not completely formed so I can build her to my taste etc.

Kobojunkie:
1. There is nothing childish about what she stated. It is usually best you engage someone who you are on the same mental wavelength with than with someone who you can't even be in agreement with on anything.

The primary reason why many, including those who marry their age mates, along with so many who marry those much younger end up sad and miserable is they place such things as age, and ego, above the important things like respect, equality in relationship and love.

2. If your mental wavelength at age 36, is still at 26, then you are not doing it wrong going for someone of that age. The key is you ensure you are doing so for the right reasons . Not because you are want a partner you can teach/dominate and control but instead a partner you respect and see as your equal in all-wise, this even with the age gap.

Thank you.

oldienavie:
I will guess you are probably not up to 25 years old, so I will forgive you for these childish assumptions and imagination.
Things are not always black and white and if you go through this NL, you'd see lots of people who married their course mates and still had problems in the marriage.

I am old enough to know that the fact you are same age with someone does not mean you are of the same mindset and you both have the same value system and outlook to life, which are the key things that makes a marriage work.

English is truly very hard,where in my post did I talk about you or rather made a personal observation I applied only to myself my opinion was subjective and not for you or anybody it is my personal preference so I don't get your anger.


You are 36 years old good to know but then you are the childish one for coming to throw tantrums on my mentions who needs your forgiveness did I in anyway offend you
They are not assumptions they are my personal preference that has so far worked for me you came on this forum seeking advice and I did not condemn you so I don't get this hullabaloo you are trying to exhibit since I am less than 25 years old and you are the older one maybe with a better brain why are you here seeking for advice if your reference to age(Iess than 25) is aimed at a personal attack on me you have failed woefully.

Anyway unto your last paragraph I know this but I prefer to be with someone within my age range not more than four years for me those things(value system, mindset, outlook) work better oya cry.

Ibime:
Kyiv has not been attacked yet

The Ukrainians are waiting for them in the Cities so they can equalise Russia's technological and longe-range advantage with street fighting in an urban environment.

Russia has not entered the inner cities yet. They will try not to enter any except Kiev. They only need Kiev to force the Ukrainians to surrender

Russia knows the Ukrainians are highly motivated and likely to keep Russia trapped in urban guerilla warfare for weeks on end. Putin is not ready to pay that price, that's why he's bringing Syrians to do the dirty work, because the body count will be high

Hmm interesting.

This war on Ukraine is pointless

To each your own, you don't need our advice if you are both comfortable with it.

I am not a fan of high age gaps the most I can do is four years older or younger. Anything up to five has always been a no for me so I would not even bother dating a person with five years age difference from me because I believe I can relate better with my peers and that we usually belong in the same generation, malleable and learning in our own pace and not with a man who may be over a decade older who's opinions/world view is hard to change or not easy to dialogue with. Age is a factor for me and it matters I relate with everyone regardless of age but I am more relaxed among my peers and I need someone within my generation and age to relate with very easily because I am very playful and unserious sometimes I don't want a situation where I will call you boy and you will take offence that I should be calling you your excellency abeg I cannot deal with hard people who are not flexible I believe that flexibility comes with how you relate with people and they are mostly your peers and not your parent's age mates why to do you think that peer pressure is a thing in the first place it is because children relate with who they can easily access and discuss with mostly their peers given the fact that some parents are not flexible with their kids.

And I will prefer that we grow old together not me nursing you in your 70s and I am in my 50s or early 60s with so much life to enjoy.

Thank you very much.

OP, the choice is for the both of you to make.

The "do your own research" folks who are just basically folks in love with an alternative reality while thinking they are smart are angry that duckduckgo chose to do the right thing.


Clowns

Nor be only liberators

Russian bots at it again someone who has amassed his wealth from being a dictator and killing dissenters is who I should see as the good guy.

Una heads not correct.

joyandfaith:
Who controls information in youtube?

Are you minding them


Ukraine did not provoke Russia, Russia attacked them unprovoked but we should not see Russia as the villain here but Ukrainians for defending their land.

Clowns

You are the one who needs deliverance.

Lol.

Things don't seem to be going according to plan for Vladimir

Some folks will say it is Russian propaganda but why has Kyiv not fallen yet

https://twitter.com/AdamKinzinger/status/1502459450355068930?t=PUDZoxmfssBtuOnbxIV6-A&s=19

Adam Kinzinger's thread quite an interesting read.

raumdeuter:
There is a difference between visiting and living in a place

Visitors to Nigeria have a different experience than those who live there

Yes some parents intentionally hurt their kids, there are parents who p1mpp out their kids, there are parents who flog their kids with intentions to harm and there are parents who have actually killed their kids

Like I said parents don't intentionally hurt their kids the percentage is even less than 20.

Bring out evidence of liberal policies hurting kids and why exactly some of these kids end up there another thing is since these services exist why does government not actually tackle the problem an example would be letting women decide for themselves if they are capable of training the kids instead of shoving it down their throats that they must keep a pregnancy they are not interested in keeping then going around to show the kids hell on earth and later getting social services involved.
That is what government should be doing not telling me what the best interest for my child is especially when doctors in the field mostly do not see it that way

Raumdeuter since the GQP is now interested in kids rights and protecting children is it not time to outlaw male circumcision you know since the parents are not capable enough of caring for their children or making good parental decisions and it is now the job of the GQP why not outlaw circumcision on minors and wait till they are 18 to decide for themselves?

We already know that the rate is declining already let's just completely abolish it and criminalise it then send anyone to jail who thinks of abusing their boys

raumdeuter:
Go to the nearest Child Protective Services or talk to a social worker and hear about what some parents do to kids?

Oh you are not in America, you only read what the liberal media feeds you.

I have been to America and anywhere my money can take me even Nigeria has social workers.

Bring out the statistics on the reasons why child protection services exist in the first place.

Like I said parents do not intentionally hurt their kids and no parent consulting with a doctor for what is in the best interest of their kids end up in child protection services, protection services exist today not because of what liberals do to their kids.

raumdeuter:
I was not taught about sex under the age of 8 by any teacher

What is your intention of teaching under 8 children about sex without their parents approval?

No parent will intentionally hurt their child? Obviously liberals live in alternate world. What then is the role of Child protective services since parents don't hurt their children intentionally

Oh good to know that but you said nobody teaches a child about those stuff without approval from the parents and I am asking you if you were not taught sex education.
Don't over exaggerate nobody does anything without the approval of parents.
Against anything seen to be abusive the doctors don't see reassignment surgery as abuse neither do child protection services go after parents who do reassignment surgery.

Be realistic dude

raumdeuter:
Should we also allow parents who decide to starve their children

Marry off their children underage, even kill their children go ahead since you don't want govt to interfere

To be realistic how many children have government fed?the GQP does not like handouts and social spending anyway and don't over exaggerate parents don't intentionally starve their kids anywhere in the world.

You are just over exaggerating even in Afghanistan or the north where child marriage is done it is as a result of poverty, no hope and choice that is why it is the duty of government to provide these amenities to avoid that and make life good instead of policing the privacy of how parents choose to raise their children.

Your party is not interested in that but rather interested in control

raumdeuter:
That is the issue and it has to do with common sense laws for those who have common sense
So if a parent decide to marry out their 5yr old children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If a parent decide to starve their children the state should allow them and not interfere?

If parents decide to kill or castrate their children they should be allowed and not interfere?

Sensible people will know parents should be allowed to have a right on how their children are raised while lines should be drawn when it some to issues bordering on abuse and insanity like performing gender altering surgery on a minor

Republicans don't like gender surgeries on minors, Republicans don't like sexual teaching to children under 8. The question is why do Democrats like it and why are you defending it? I[b]s there a 7yr old that is not your child you will want to discuss sex with without the parents knowledge[/b]?

Interfere interfere interfere goes against what your party teaches.

There are reasons why parents are the guardians of kids leave the parents to decide for themselves and stop invading people's privacy by taunting them.
@bold,I am sure that when you were taught sex education in school your teacher waited for your parents to come and give permission first before you were taught about it or was that not included in your educational curriculum even some parents deliberately wait for teachers to expose their kids to puberty.

Oh I forgot it is not about CRT so parents no longer have a right anymore but lawmakers should get to decide the others laws for them.The hypocrisy is deafening.

No parent will intentionally hurt a child so your points are a bit sketchy the parents allowing reassignment surgeries consulted with the doctors and they saw it to be in the best interest of their children.

You are talking about common sense laws then let the parents use their common senses to decide and stop defending what does not even correlate with what their true aim is.

sanpipita:
This thing Republicans are doing will backfire soon more questions like this will be asked by Americans, you can't keep riling against control then go on to cherry pick on what to control.

Amazontopaz

Hypocrisy is the GQP

raumdeuter:
Do you think it's right to perform gender change surgery on a minor?

Leave it for the parents and doctors to decide not lawmakers.
It is none of your business especially for a party that wants to limit how government control their lives or prevent them from regulating their guns but want to regulate the personal lives of others the hypocrisy is glaring.