₦airaland Forum

Amujale:
There was never ever slavery or any sort of slave trade on the continent prior to the arrival of the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers.

blueAgent:
Really?

Yes, really.

Assuming you have any evidence that contradicts these facts, then provide it here.

blueAgent:
Go read about Slavery in India and Asia nations.

There's nothing a brainless knitwit such as you can tell me about world history.

There was never a slave trade in India or any other Asian nation.

Assuming you have such evidence, post them here.

Evidence, not broken links and Eurocentric opinions.

blueAgent:
I gave you proofs and you claim they are false.

No you didn't.

You wrote gibberish and posted a broken link that leads to nowhere.

Again, learn to READ.

blueAgent:
You don't know the meaning of slavery to start with. that's too bad.

No, the joke is on you.

You cannot READ to save your life.

Amujale:
More rhetoric, all one can take away from this link is the fact that adherents of Christianity enslaved Africans in the Americas for over 500 years, all the other rhetoric amounts to nothing.



Stop lying.

Furthermore, there's noone born from there mother's womb that can successfully justify colonisation and slavery. Assuming that what you are trying, then you are merely wasting your time.

blueAgent:
I resent lairs.



"We think this trade must go on....

You are deranged and void of any sense whatsoever.

Perhaps you ought to learn how to READ.

Furthermore, all that nonsense you wrote supposedly is from the 19th century, eventhough it's more probably fakery and falsehood, can't you READ.

Slavery and colonisation was perpetrated by Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers for a period that exceeds 2000 years.

Quoting an empty 19th century nonsense that has no source is a complete waste of time and amounts to nothing.

blueAgent:
Get sense.

My great -grandfather sold slaves, Nigerian journalist confesses.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53444752

When did BBC become a valid source for slavery and colonisation?

Who were the Eurocentric warmongers who partook in slavery and colonisation?

Try again.

I've ready told you I will end your trolling career.

Furthermore, that makes your great grand father a bastard and a traitor.

While everyone else were fighting to end those horrific crimes, your great grandfather was busy being a jerk.

That's correct, most Africans fought against slavery and colonisation up until the 1900's.

Thanks for letting us know who you and your family are.

There was never ever slavery or any sort of slave trade on the continent prior to the arrival of the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers.

blueAgent:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/19/magazine/history-slavery-smithsonian.html

More rhetoric, all one can take away from this link is the fact that adherents of Christianity enslaved Africans in the Americas for over 500 years, all the other rhetoric amounts to nothing.

blueAgent:
From Europeans to Asians were all victims of slavery trade and colonization..

Stop lying.

Furthermore, there's noone born from there mother's womb that can successfully justify colonisation and slavery. Assuming that what you are trying, then you are merely wasting your time.

blueAgent:
https://www.theguardian.com/guardianweekly/story/0,12674,1171347,00.html

That's a broken link that leads to nowhere.

blueAgent:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe

Again, those are lies.

When I ask for proof, I expected that you provide physical proof whereby one could actually attest to these and not mere rhetoric.

For instance, noone in their right senses can deny the fact that there were three major slave trades that took place on the continent due to the fact that there's proof to back it up.

Again, I don't have any interest in rhetoric.

Try again, now name one European or Asian country that experienced colonisation and slavery.

blueAgent:
I deal with facts...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade

No, you deal in fakery and falsehood.

That was part of the transaharan that took place on the continent.

blueAgent:
Cyprus and Malta was colonized by Britain, same with UAE,Kuwait, Qatar ,Bahrain, Singapore those countries have moved on and are better off than pre-colonial time.

Firstly you're unable to distinguish colonisation and slavery from occupation, they aren't the same.

Go and read a proper history book and cease making a complete fool of yourself.

Secondly, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Singapore werent occupied by Britain for that long, there is no comparison. Try again.

Christianity and Islam in the form of the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers perpetrated slavery and colonisation for a period that exceeds 2000 years.

If only you could read properly, how I wish you could actually read, by now you ought to have learnt that the exploitation that took place and is still taking place on the continent is unequal and unparalleled to any in human history.

Furthermore, you're a liar neither of those countries experience slavery.

Stop lying.

Now try again, name one country in Europe or Asia that experienced colonisation and slavery.

blueAgent:
Clown.

Failed people always giving excuse..

Who are you referring to?

Stop talking about yourself, people get sectioned into a squirrel cage for less.

blueAgent:
US would have failed and blame Russia and China for meddling in their politics.

You're a sorry case. You need help.

What has that got to does with slavery and colonisation.

Are you even aware what they are?

Keep proving my point for me.

blueAgent:
You are a big fool.

From Europeans to Asians were all victims of slavery trade and colonization yet they are all doing fine..

The only fool on this forum is you.

If you cannot name one European or Asian country that experienced slavery and colonisation then you've proved that your a bastard.

I'm waiting for the list of European and or Asian countries.

blueAgent:
Show me one black runner city or country that is not a 3rd World..

Show me one African country that isn't being subjected to neo-colonialism.

blueAgent:
Clown.

Failed race.

Bastard, ungrateful bastard.

Your feutus ought to have been flushed into the sea before it could have developed into the piece of muck that it has become.

You are a failed piece of muck.

blueAgent:
Intelligent really?


And yet all they call produce is 3rd World nation despite getting everything for free...

Who is the "they" that you are referring to?

Are you going to answer my questions?

Go ahead, answer the series of questions that I posed to your brainless self.

blueAgent:
Scrabble for Africa, occurred 50yrs,after Slavery has been instituted in Africa.

Neither can you use it to prove that Africa's resources were looted that made Africa poor.

I want you to read that back to youself a few times and ask yourself whether it makes any sense.

According to all and any historical account, slavery and colonisation is the main cause of how the continent is as of today.

Go and hide under a piece of rock and don't leave until you re reunited with your senses.

blueAgent:
I can stop laughing at you.

I can believe their are people so naive and ingnorant like you.

Instead of your to answer my question you waste the chance you've been given to redeem your self with more nonsensical remarks.

Goes to prove what I've been saying all this while, that you are nothing but a Eurocentric apologist.

An utter waste of my time.

Amujale:
My advice is for you to go and throw all the nonsense you've been reading in the thrash can and pick up proper history textbooks.

blueAgent:
There are several nations who were colonized and they are doing very well only black nations fail and blame colonization for it.

You call the true narrative of history, blame?

Where is the accountability?

Answer this simply question.

According to your warped mindset, is slavery and colonisation right or wrong? Go!

blueAgent:
You are the reason why the west think blacks are inferior and low IQed...

No knitwit, it's you that think yourself inferior, it's you that has an acute level of inferiority complex, I and most Africans that know and are proud of our history don't have such predicament to worry about.

Your reverse psychology has failed you yet again.

blueAgent:
It is also a fact that Europeans trade and contact with Africans were limited to the coast till late into 18century when the Europeans started going further.

Further, where?

You're completely and utterly wrong.

Whoever taught you such nonsense ought to be locked away in an isolated dungeon and the keys thrown away into the deep blue.

You're false narratives have failed you.

Have you ever heard of the 'Scramble for Africa'?

All that nonsense you wrote belongs in the garbage.

Try again, and this time try to make sense.

blueAgent:
You are a big fool.

The only fool around here is you.

You aren't only a fool, you are a bastard as well.

I asked you to provide evidence of your condescending remarks and you begin to foam from the mouth similar to a rabbies patient.

blueAgent:
Why not accept the fact that Africans are too dull to know resources...

No, Africans are smart, intelligent and highly skilled.

Africans are responsible for all the better things in life.


It isn't the fault of the African that some greedy bastards thought it necessary to invade our space, murder, steal, loot, plunder and perpetrate colonisation and slavery.

It's you and your entire continuum that are dullards.

blueAgent:
The question you should ask yourself is do Nigerians have the skill required to exploit Crude oil if not for western education and colonization?

Again, you have no sense and may our ancestors that suffered all those years at the hands of colonisation haunt you and your entire continuum for ever more until you receive sense and apologize.

Nothing good came out of colonisation.

As stated earlier for those that can actually read properly, colonisation is one of the worst attrocities in all of human history.

blueAgent:
Even African historians and scholars confirm that it was Africans who sold there own people as slaves.
.

Again, in case you couldn't read properly, the notion that Africans sold other Africans into slavery is the biggest lie in all of human history.

If you cannot produce any evidence then you are a bastard.

I'm a historian and I'm telling you without a shadow of doubt that the Arabian fundamentalist and the Eurocentric warmongers are the ones who traded in slaves.

The people that fake historians purposefully claim to have been African weren't, they were Arabian and or wannabe Arabian.

blueAgent:
Since it was called trade why did Africans not use the proceeds they got from selling their own people

The notion that Africans sold other Africans into slavery is the biggest lie in all of human history.

All the blame of slavery and colonisation lies squarely at the feet of Christianity and Islam.

It was the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers that were doing the trading, not Africans.

How old are you?

These horrific incidents haven't been that long ago.

The Transatlantic slave trade xisted up until the 1900's, whilst colonisation continues today.

My advice is for you to go and throw all the nonsense you've been reading in the thrash can and pick up proper history textbooks.

blueAgent:
So the transatlantic slave trade made America rich?

Everyone knows that to be true except for Eurocentric apologist such as yourself.

blueAgent:
US is the World richest nation yet it never colonized any African nation.

You are poorly read on history, and it shows.

During the Transatlantic slave trade, where were most of the ship's that was transporting stolen Africans heading?

For example, the first slave ship to touch down on American shores was called "Jesus"

And that's a well known fact.

Furthermore, it's also a well known fact that the "industrialisation age" was built off the back of the Transatlantic slave trade.

Go and research Jim Crow because that WAS colonisation.


In a nutshell, the Transatlantic slave trade and Colonisation were the worst attrocities in all of human history.

America were one of the worst colonisers in human history.

blueAgent:
The oil mined in Nigeria is the revenue paid to the West or to Nigerian government account?

That's the wrong question to be asking.

The correct question is as thus,

Who is mining the oil and why?

The colonialist have been exploiting the continent for over 1000 years and it still continues today.

Ask yourself the question, why is it that Nigeria's oil isn't being minned by Nigerians? I guess that thought has never crossed your mind as you're engrossed in spreading malicious propaganda.

Why is it that foreign companies such as Shell, Chevron e.t.c are the ones mining our oil?

Why is it that Nigerians arent being allowed to invest in our own natural resources?

Why is it that not one single Nigerian individual based companies own their own fair share of oil wells and the right to mine our own oil?


Why is it that foreign companies own all the rights to mine our oil?

Why isn't DRC's coltan being mined for the benefit of the Democratic Republic of Congo?

DRC produces 80% of the world's Coltan, and yet the country isn't one of the richest in the world, why?

Almost everyone in the world owns a mobile phone and yet such statistics doesn't change where DRC are on the list of richest countries.

blueAgent:
For example in Nigeria we have Iron ore and Coal that are not in any way been developed to there potential.

Who are the 'we' that you're referring to?

You aren't Nigerian, you're a Eurocentric wannabe.

Anyone who can read already knows for a fact that the Arabian fundamentalist and Eurocentric warmongers perpetrated slavery and colonisation precisely to take advantage of our natural resources.

And such is still the situation today.

The main reason that us aren't developing any of our natural resources to the full potential is mainly due to Neo-colonialism.

They set all the standards that our political class simply follows.

We can blame our political class all we want (and rightfully so) however the real problem are the colonialist that appear to have left after so-called Independence but really didn't and simply morphed into neo-colonialist.