₦airaland Forum

Just to be clear, eventhough i agree with the main thrust of Jane's lecture, yet i disagree with the assertion that suggest all whitesic people are "racist".

I disagree on multiple counts.

Firstly, race or racism doesnt exist, discrimination and bigotry is what realy exist.

Secondly, since what she really meant was to suggest that all whitesic people are bigots, then one can easily disagree with that assertion aswell.

Furthermore, its the various Eurocentric institutions that are infact discriminatory and displays all the signs of "white supremacy".

Western education teaches a wrong, unrealistic, spiteful and discriminatory narrative on history.

Western education on history and almost any other subject is simply wrong and unrealistic.

The contents on most subjects are normally correct i.e mathematics; but the history of how they got the content is usually wrong and spiteful.

For example, Pythagoras didnt invent the Pythagorean theorem, Africans did. Yet Western education continues to teach that thorem as though it was Pythagoras, when in actual fact African mathematicians have been using the thorem in their calculations even before Pythagoras himself was born.

Jane Elliot is correct with her lecture in the video, there's only one true version of history, the other versions are false.

Anyone that wants to know about history ought study or read history textbooks authored by genuine historians.

They came before Columbus by Ivan Sertima is a history textbook.

African People in World History by J. Hendrik Clarke is a history textbook.

A History of the African-Olmecs: Black Civilisations of America from Prehistoric Times to the Present Era by Paul Barton is a history textbook.

The African Origin of Civilisation by Cheikh Anta Diop is a history textbook.

Not Out of Greece: African Origin of Western Civilization by RA UN NEFER AMEN is a history textbook.

Read, listen to the audios of, study and research upon books authored by genuine historians.

delishpot:
What has the black nation done to disprove their theory?

So much, its common knowledge that humanity began in Africa.

African historians have been educating those that are able to learn.

The problem has always been West Asia and Europe's ability to manufacture various versions of false history at will.

The woman in the video cited a good example of Christopher Columbus false claim of discovering the Americas.

There are countless similar instances.

The bottomline is that Africans have been in existence since the dawn of time, whilst Asians and Europeans are relatively new comers to planet Earth.

Everyone that studies African history ought know that already.

According to African history, Humanity began in Africa and then our ancestors went on to populate the rest of the world.

Africans are the first people to explore and populate all the other 'continents.

Africans invented paper and they invented the ink pen.

Africans discovered the concepts of literacy.

Africans discovered the concepts of numeracy.

Civilization began in Africa and then it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

Everyone currently living on planet Earth all descend from African ethnicities.

Another pretty European American that chooses to say the truth.

I just love the way she gave "education" a complete breakdown.

She deserves a spirited round of applause.

That is utterly wrong and spiteful. Shows your lack of understanding of global general knowledge.

OruExpress:
No it's not, at all. It doesn't matter if people recognize the nigerian flag and culture. 'Nigerian culture' spread because
....

Again, can you see your display of the lack of understanding here?

In the first part of the above quote you acknowledge Nigerian influence, and in the next sentence you claim that it isnt .

Furthermore, following general knowledge and global statistics, you will arrive at the conclusion that there are more people living in a single state in Nigeria than there are in the state of Israel and Palestine combined.


You are utterly and completely wrong. And your argument are pointless.

Dont allow your hate for Nigeria to cloud your judgement. Everyone can see that you hate Nigeria, therefore you cannot possesss a fair opinion on Nigeria's global influence.

In the first part of the above quote you claim that Nigeria hasnt influence, and immediately afterwards you start with:

"The parts of Nigeria that are recognised globally."...

Can you see that youre conflating Nigerian global influence with the existence of the country.

That is in itself an altogether seperate topic.

My advice is for you to go and learn the relevance of history and how it connects to the influence described in previous post.

Globally, Nigeria is arguably one of the most influential countries in Africa.

You sitting there on your arm chair arguing blindly and pointlessly doesnt change these simple truths.

How many African communities outside of Africa have you visited in 2019 ?

Your barracking and interjections on these specific subject matter are pointless and baseless.

OruExpress:
...calling people masters...

They arent masters they were colonial rougues and scroungers; the theiving bastards.

OruExpress:
Most of the tribes in Nigeria fought the British for no less that 30-50 years.

I agree with your analysis here.

Although would kindly point out the fact that Africa doesnt have tribes, Africa has ethnicity.

Asians and Europeans have tribes.

OruExpress:
Nigeria influences little to nothing, not even it's self. No country in Africa is influential on a political level though Nigeria had the best chance at being so and Ethiopia once was.

You are writting out of ignorance aswell as not completely understanding what has been written here.

Nigeria is arguably the most influential African country on the global stage.

That is to say, Nigeria influence around the globe is arguably the greatest in Africa.

All the countries outside of Africa recognise the Nigerian flag and the Nigerian culture as distinctive and highly influential, arguably the most influential on the continent.

Maximus69:
Result is the only way to prove if something is authentic or false!

Yet you havent produced any, that is my point.

You have produced zero results in your attempt to refute the truth about Abrahamic religious text.

The fact that all Abrahamic religious text are false, fake and counterintuitive.

Amujale:
Results is something you have failed to produce.

According to all the evidence, All Abrahamic religious text arent to be taken serious.

That is what i want you to address, instead of veering off on a tangent.

Address the fact that Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterinntuitive.

Address the fact that all the authors of Abrahamic religious text are dubious and untrustworthy.

Maximus69:
what matters now is RESULT!

Results is something you have failed to produce.

According to all the evidence, All Abrahamic religious text arent to be taken serious.

That is what i want you to address, instead of veering off on a tangent.

Address the fact that Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterinntuitive.

Address the fact that all the authors of Abrahamic religious text are dubious and untrustworthy.

All Abrahamic religious text are fakse, fake and counterintuitive.

Maximus69:
The Bible has been vindicated!

Jesus prayed for his followers to become a happy global family (John 17:20-23)and we're eyewitnesses of the fact that Jehovah's Witnesses have form a happy global family of peace loving worshipers today!

Sorry Sir, God has blessed those Bible writers and no man can curse them!

From what is the Christian bible vindicated from?

(a) lies?

no the Christian bible isnt vindicated from the amount of lies and fabrication present within its make up.

(b) deceit? e.t.c

no, the Christian bible isnt vindicated from that neither.

Kindly tell me what you think the Christian bible is vindicated from?

What authors of the Christisn bible?

Can you name one of the authors of the Christian bible?

Dyou even know who the authors of the Christian Bible are?

Ive already proven to you that the Jesus character didnt exist as the authors of the Christian bible would have you believe.

Quoting the same material under the spotlight as your defence doesnt help your argument whatsoever.

As a matter of fact, the contents from within Abrahamic religious text are unverifiable.

Maximus69:
Thanks God for giving us the Bible!

May the Almighty God vanquish the souls of the authors of the christian bible for years that amount to an infinity.

I hope that they are never allowed to make paradise until all the mess that they've gone away from is resolved.

African history represents the true history of the world.

As in, at a certain point in history the only people living on planet Earth are black, brown and bronze African.

That is to say, when the people of Africa are living in their glourious communities for thousands of years, there wasnt any inhabittants in either Asia, Europe or anywhere else.

Question:

What is the importance of reading and studying history?

Answer:

Its important to learn about history due to the simple understanding that suggests:

"For one to be able to determine where it is one is going, its important to learn and understand where one is at present and where one has been in the past".

The true history of our world is steadfast and unaffected by fakery and fabrication.

Before the unwanted intervention of either the Arabic fundamentalist or Eurocentrics, Africans are living in relative peace and unism.

Atleast 50% of world history occurs within the continent of Africa.

There is only one true version of history, all the other narratives are false.

Its a universally accepted fact that humanity began in Africa and then they went forward to populate the rest of the world in what is commonly known to historians as the "Out of Africa" theory.

Africans are the first people to explore and populate all the other 'continents.

Africans invented paper and they invented the ink pen.

Africans discovered the concepts of literacy.

Africans discovered the concepts of numeracy.

Civilization began in Africa and then it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

Everyone currently living on planet Earth all descend from Africa.

Stop reading Abrahamic religious text as though they are historical documents, they arent.

Pick up a book on African history, read and learn and concentrate on real history instead.

Its important to be able to distinguish between real and falsified history

Here are some textbooks on real history that are authored by genuine historians:

. Africa in World History by Dr Hendrik Clarke

. The African Origin of Civilisation by Cheikh Anta Diop

. Africa: mother of "Western civilization" by Yosef-Ben-Jochannan

. New dimensions in African history by Yosef-Ben-Jochannan and Dr Hendrik Clarke.

. They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America by Dr Ivan Sertima

Maximus69:
Sorry Sir,

While the world is divided due to Racism and Politics, South Africans are killing blacks of their kind, Middle east is filled with terror and there is no nation that can unite with another despite being BLACK with all your so called VIRTUOUSNESS.

The world isnt divided, its all the Abrahamic religions that are devisive.

What has south Africa got to does with the fact that Abrahamic religious text being a false representation of history?

The Middle East is full of terror yet that is where the so-called "holy" lands of Abrahamic religious text is situated.

There is nothing 'holy' about the lands in the Middle East.

According to history, their is nothing 'holy' about those regions due to the fact that Eurocentrics and West Asians spent all their existence waging wars of supremacy against one another.

Maximus69:
Your African virtue failed woefully to present a document that's agreed upon by (at least) your own black people.

Noone needs a document in order to determine the difference between right and wrong, one can simply listen to the advice of our parents, elders and tutors.

You continue to insult your own heritage in favour of lies and foreign rhetouric, what does that make you?

An ingrate?

You cannot hide behinde your ignorance anymore due the amount of material present on the thread that can only lead one to the conclusion that Abrahamic religious text are indeed fake.

Its fair to say that you display the thoughts of one that has been totally brain washed beyond repair.

Maximus69:
The Bible {Abrahamic religious texts} has united over 8,500,000 people from divers nationalities across the globe today, making them one happy global family of peace loving worshipers!

So case is closed!

Can you kindly cite one example of where the lies inside of Abrahamic text has united anyone?

On the contrary, the main purpose of Abrahamic religious text isnt to unite, but to brainwash innocent people into believing a false and unrealistic narrative.

Its fair to say that ive proven beyond reasonable doubt that all Abrahamic religious text are false, fake and counterintuitive.

There isnt one character or story present in all of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original, if they wasnt stolen, they was copied, plagerised, sexed-up or simply outrightly fabricated.

All Abrahamic religious text are false, fake and counterintuitive.

The Jesus character is fake.


The Jesus character never existed in the past and certainly doesn’t exist today, rather he is a plagerisation of various older philosophical characters and concepts i.e Horus the son of Isis & Osiris.

According to African history, the birth of Horus was nothing short of a miracle, during his life in the world was said to have mystified his audience with his performance in miracles; i.e healing the blind e.t.c In many of his recorded history, claimed to have known the path to the heavens; claimed to his followers that his dad was God.


According to a particular ancient Egyptian text; KM.Tic text Horus says and i quote:

"I am Horus in glory . . . I am the Lord of the Light . . . I am the victorious one . . . I am the heir of endless time . . . I, even I, am he that knoweth the path towards the heavens"


In his hand is what's known in KM.Tic mythology as an "Ankh". The one Horus is holding in the depiction below.

According to the people of KM.T an Ankh symbolizes re-birth or reincarnation.

It’s important to note that much of the true characters and stories in KM.Tic spirituality are thousands of years older than either Arabian or European theologies.

KM.T represents the English translation into the words 'Kemet' or 'Kemit', is said to be the original name of the land currently occupied by the present day people of Egypt.

Maximus69:
So if Africans and virtuousness fits in hand in glove as you said,
How come Africans have failed woefully to make Africa a haven?
Why are your leaders looting your treasury and taking it to the white?
Why are blacks killing blacks, e.g as it's happening right now in South Africa?
Why is it that Africans can't unite just as the United States of America?
Are you saying that after over fifty years of your independence, your virtuousness has failed to help you create a haven with all your natural resources?

Keep deceiving yourself!

Well for your information, over 8,500,000 people from divers nationalities across the globe have declared themselves one big happy family of peace loving worshipers today! John 17:20-23

They have learnt to settle all their differences, they vowed never to handle weapons no more, never to learn about wars no more! Micah 4:2-4
 And they're working zealously to help all those living around them to do the same. Matthew 28:19-20

Guess what made this possible in this generation that's filled with hatred caused by Politics and Racism? 2Timothy 3:1-5

Well, It's no other document than the 66 little books that makes up what is known today as the Bible! Isaiah 2:1-4

So all your arguments that's based on sentiment is futile as in insubstantial, having no value Sir!

Let me remind you that you fail to make any sensible response to the questions posed by my post.

Instead, similar to the authors of Abrahamic religious text you continue to make false and ridiculous claims.

Calling names doesnt address the fact that the Christian bible is a weapon of mass destruction.

God gave you a brain, kindly make good use of it and stop being a slow poke.

Your contributions comes across as somone that isnt really African or is ill-informed or if you are African then must be utterly brain dead.

Have you bothered to research anything written here?

You are suffereing from chronic inferiority complex, i am really sorry for those innocent people that you continue to deceive.


Similar to all the other Abrahamic text out there, the Christian bible is a bibliography filled with lies, fiction and plagerised content.

Amujale:
Normally, Africans and virtuosness fit hand in glove.

Historically, Arabians and Eurocentrics are absolute warmongers.


Yet, they attempt to hide these truth from us by peddling fake history by means of their Abrahamic text.

In order to be presented with the real history of our world,  one must first have to disregard all Abrahamic religious related text.

Then, it becomes clear that West Asia and Europe has two types of discourse running concurrently on history:

(a) Their true and genuine history i.e looting, stealing, warmongery and desecrating sacred sites all around the globe.

(b) Fakery, Manufactured history. i.e Abrahamic religious text.

Oranmiyan ni ajagun segun.

Idiniyi ti a fi ma nki Oranyan ni wipe:

O ba ina ja, o da ina.
O ba oorun ja, o da oorun.
O ba agbada ja lese omi, o dagbada.
Gbajure.

Oranmiyan, Akin Orun.
Okunrin pupa Iyana.
Okunrin gagagugu ti ngba ojutoro wole.
Onile o ju opopo.
Abule gogoro.
Atofarati ma jaya lolo.
Elenpe Iwagun.
O wa'gun f'eru.
O wa'gun f'omo.
Akin nile.
Akin logun.
Ofodofodo.
Ofodo fodo.
Ofoyara, Fo kanga.
At'odo ati Iyara.
Ko si kan to le da baba duro.
Gbajure.

There isnt anything wrong with religion per se, its the Abrahamic ones that are wholly problematic and ridiculous.

As in, the African concepts behind the essence of the term 'religion' is supposed to make one relative to virtuousness.

Virtuousness is a fun and nice quality to have.

Religion is not the problem per se, its all the Abrahamic ones that are, they have been found out to be peddling falsities, fakery and manufactured history.

It's claimed that China has been a great power, regional power, and economic power continously for over 1900 years.

Throughout its history, China has almost always had one of the world's largest economies, largest population, and a powerful Navy.

It all started from building a long and high wall all across their country, famously chastised the "Great Wall of China".

Then, great leaders that consider themselves as servants, similar to Deng Xaoping, using all their academic, social and political capacity to achieve great feats in China's rapid reinvention of itself.

During those times, 88% of chineese people ware living in poverty, yet, the leaders kept grinding at their fundamentals, especially defence, security and unconditional nationalism.

Deng Xiapong introducing their concept of market economy in the 1970's, the reforms of those concepts opened the country to foreign investment and the rest is history.

Undoubtedly, the essential thing in the 1970's, in 1978 China allows farmers to sell their products in local markets, and governments also allowed honest  individual companies to carry out commercial opperations with foreign companies.

From 1978 to 2012, Chins's gross domestic product grew an average of 9.4 percent each year. No economy of any other nation has grown so fast for so long.

Afer 35 years of almost uninterrupted growth, according to some measures, such as purchasing power, China's economy is now the largest in the world.

Its argued that they are responsible in helping push the standard of living in China to as high as it has ever been.

Normally, Africans and virtuosness fit hand in glove.

Historically, Arabians and Eurocentrics are absolute warmongers.

Lets take a look at a hyperthetical scenario below:

An armed robber loots ones belongings at the dead of night and returns the next morning preaching some goblydegook about how to become a virtuous human being.

For me, i would shoot the returning armed robber first and ask questions later. Never in a million years would i be willing to listen to his/her mumbojumbo about anything until my belongings are fully recovered.

Even after assuming im able to succesfully recover my belongings, it would be counterintuitive and outrightly wrong to then be sourcing any sort of moral or ethical expeditions from such a thieving character.

Yet, they attempt to hide these truth from us by peddling fake history by means of their Abrahamic text.

In order to be presented with the real history of our world,  one must first have to disregard all Abrahamic religious related text.

Then, it becomes clear that West Asia and Europe has two types of discourse running concurrently on history:

(a) Their true and genuine history i.e looting, stealing, warmongery and desecrating sacred sites all around the globe.

(b) Fakery, Manufactured history. i.e Abrahamic religious text.

Maximus69:
Please tell me the part of all the texts {recorded in the Bible} that's AGAINST logic and common sense!

Let’s start with the Abrahamic religious textual image of “God”.

How is God meant to be the contextual image of an Asian or European when everyone knows that humanity began in ‘South of the Sahara’ Africa?

Plus, under what circumstance is it permitable for a bunch of murderers and war mongers to be claiming to know anything about virtuousness?

Furthermore, relative to our recent history, it makes no sense whatsoever for an African to be worshiping or honouring anything coming out of either Asia or Europe.


Lets take a look at a hyperthetical scenario below:

An armed robber loots ones belongings at the dead of night and returns the next morning preaching some goblydegook about how to become a virtuous human being.

For me, i would shoot the returning armed robber first and ask questions later. Never in a million years would i be willing to listen to his/her mumbojumbo about anything until my belongings are fully recovered.

Even after assuming im able to succesfully recover my belongings, it would be counterintuitive and outrightly wrong to then be sourcing any sort of moral or ethical expeditions from such a thieving character.

Maximus69:
Well, i've conducted a thorough research and come to the conclusion that everything written in the Bible is true!

Stop fooling yourself, there’s no such research possible.

There is noone in human history that has been able to come up with any real physical evidence that collaborates any of the Abrahamic religious textual stories.

The timelines the authors of Abrahamic religious text chose are not only implausible, most are simply impossible.

Maximus69:
Egypt was the first world power in human history and it's the same Bible that recorded how Egypt became powerful. So if the same document now revealed how they lost that position as world power, i think anyone disputing such document should be ready to tell the world how Egypt gain dominance over all other existing nations of that time in the first place!

Firstly, the Israelites are fictitious people, Israelis are real.

Furthermore, it’s the lack of understanding African history that suggest ancient Egypt as the first world power.

There have been numerous powerful and influential civilisations in Africa, ancient Egypt represents roughly about 5%.

That is to say, Ancient Egypt is amongst the latest civilisations to come out of Africa and never the first; in all reality Ancient Egypt isn't even ranked in the first 100 civilisations to come out of Africa.

All the early Central, East, South and West African civilisations predate the Nile valley civilisation in years that amount in their thousands.

People from throughout the continent came together in unism to create KM.T.

The inhabitants of Sudan and the rest of Nubia predates those of ancient Egypt.

Amujale:
Its universally accepted that Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive. Even a world reknowned Israeli historian agrees with me on the facts of these matters.


A typical example of the proof presented to us comes out of the story of Exodus.

According to Barry Turner of ResearchGate, eventhough the Exodus story is a great one, it didnt really happen.

He goes on to pose a definitive question

Why is there no evidence of Exodus?

Here is an extract from his argument:-

"According to Abrahamic text, the Hebrews led by Moses took his people out of Egypt during the reign of Rameses II

However, the history of Rameses is exceptionally well documented but there is scant evidence of any such event."

I have studied world history all my adulthood and i can second Barry Turner and will further add that the only related documented history that slighlty resembles a spec from the Exodus story has nothing to does with neither Moses nor Exodus.

The incident i refer to here is known as the "Battle of Kadesh".

During the battle of Kadesh, Ramese II is seen squashing an agressive force in which some of the aggressors are drown in the waters surrounding the battlefield.

According to Prof. Israel Finkelstein, a senior researcher at the Dept. of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of Abrahamic religious textual archeology today, the Exodus story isnt real.

In order to ascertain whether something is factual or not, one simply needs to conduct the necessary research.

There isn’t one character or storyline present in all of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original.

Hence the reason they aren’t real.

Abrahamic religious text are counterintuitive because they go against logic and common sense.


“In order to ascertain whether something is factual or not, one simply needs to conduct the necessary research.”

As in, conduct a research on the following:

(a) Barry Turner of the University of Lincoln
(b) Prof. Israel Finkelstein
(c) Ramesses II
(d) The Battle of Kadesh

Maximus69:
Before anything could be firmly established as FACT, you should be ready to answer {intelligently} all thought provoking questions that's rooted in the minds of your listener, otherwise all your words will just be like mere ASSERTIONS!

Its universally accepted that Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive. Even a world reknowned Israeli historian agrees with me on the facts of these matters.


A typical example of the proof presented to us comes out of the story of Exodus.

According to Barry Turner of ResearchGate, eventhough the Exodus story is a great one, it didnt really happen.

He goes on to pose a definitive question

Why is there no evidence of Exodus?

Here is an extract from his argument:-

"According to Abrahamic text, the Hebrews led by Moses took his people out of Egypt during the reign of Rameses II

However, the history of Rameses is exceptionally well documented but there is scant evidence of any such event."

I have studied world history all my adulthood and i can second Barry Turner and will further add that the only related documented history that slighlty resembles a spec from the Exodus story has nothing to does with neither Moses nor Exodus.

The incident i refer to here is known as the "Battle of Kadesh".

During the battle of Kadesh, Ramese II is seen squashing an agressive force in which some of the aggressors are drown in the waters surrounding the battlefield.

According to Prof. Israel Finkelstein, a senior researcher at the Dept. of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University and one of the most prominent scholars in the field of Abrahamic religious textual archeology today, the Exodus story isnt real.

In order to ascertain whether something is factual or not, one simply needs to conduct the necessary research.

Maximus69:
@Amujale.
Please can you answer these questions?

Because they're of much more importance than the assertions you're making now. You should know that if you're able to answer intelligently without repeating the same assertion over and over again like a kindergarten toddler, thousands of people will see reasons with you!

So please try answer the questions!

My advice to you is research on what you refer as 'assertions' and cease to deviate.

How does your response address the fact that all Abrahamic religious text are false, fake and counterintuitive.

Manufactured history, and the reason it was forced upon Africans was due to an ancient Eurocentric project known as the "World Order".

That project began by the Romans thousands of years ago.

Initially all of Europe and parts of Asia abide by the laws and moral code of Africa.

Then one Roman Emperor deviced a plan that would enable Europe to dominate the globe both militarily and spiritualy.

His plan was dubbed "The World Order", it was during these times that Libya was invaded as the first post-pharaonic military campaign ever launched by Europe on African soil under the stewerdship of Portugal and Spain with the so-called blessing of the then Pope.

Its important to note that Rome was never stationary, Rome moved its administrative capital on various occasions, the most commonly talked about being Constantinople that is the modern day Istanbul in Turkey.

Rome is actually a Eurocentric political concept. One that only allows for European and or their descendants domination of the world.

The "World Order" and the so-called "New World Order" are one and the same.

The adherents of the "World Order" spend hundred and thousands of years trying to nail down their unwitty claims of superiority over everyone else.

What happened was that the Romans use all the intellectual tools available to their Emperor and political class to lay their foundation of world domination.

They use psychological, sociological and military inteligence to reach their goals and objectives.

The Asians also caused havoc. Its argued that if the Asian war mongerers hadnt launched their crazy holy wars inside the continent, the Eurocentric Crusaders would never have made the military progress they achieved on the continent.

Neither the trans Atlantic slave trade nor Colonisation would never had taken place.

The argument that the Europeans won most of their crazy battles because of internal conflict is false.

Most of the internal conflicts at the time was created or exacerbated by the adherents of the "World Order"

The reason they made in roads was due to the earlier Arab wars and military campaigns combined with the Christian missionaries and Jewish missionaries that precede the crazy dash for African treasure. There was also some local traitors. They, the missionaries and traitors, were emmisaries and spies to Europe's political class and they reported much of the situation on the ground.

The scramble for Africa was a calculated campaign that involved the political classes from all over Europe, Eurocentric Royalists of the entire continent of Europe, Christian and Jewish adherents; multiple meetings and various conferences.

How does any of the Abrahamic religious text assist in defeating Colonisation and Oppression?

How?

Abrahamic religious text arent what they claims to be, instead they are bibliographies of various older religious text and typologies from all across the globe the contents of which have been repackaged, plagerised, sexed-up, or outrightly fabricated.

There isnt one character or storyline present in all of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original.

According to the current statistics, more than 50% of West Asians and Eurocentrics are neither Christian, Jew or Muslim.

Africans arent a guilty people, are relatively peaceful and unlike West Asia and Europe, have not been seen to disturb or distrupt human progress.

Africans are responsible for the progress of humanity more than any peoples on the planet; the positive impact on human progress made by Africans and their descendants is more than the combined contribution of Asia, Australasia and Europe. The Americas isnt include due to the fact that most of Americas contribution to human progress are those of African descendants; from their Architecrural to their Engineering and Eletrical technique pioneering to the modern day Science and Technology.

These are what Africans need to be reading and studying upon and not some manufactured histories coming outside of Africa.

Keep hold onto our virtuousness, get rid of all the Abrahamic religions.

A woman with university degrees makes another person who is a legitimate university graduate.

Its an absurd connection, ones level of education to be conflated with the nuclear family home.

In actual fact, we need more women graduating from universities. There simply arent enough out there, especially in the Engineering and Science related fields of study.

The logical argument would suggest that we need more of our black, brown and bronze women acquiring university degrees.

I sense a hint of misogyny by the presenter that Op refers to, or the least he must be suffering from chronic delusions.

The truth is that the more women university degree holders, the better for us all.