₦airaland Forum

The constructing of the Pyramid of Djoser is known to be the work of Imhotep, a Nubian scientistsic ; the world's first ever known multi-genius.

The most remarkable physician of all time and the greatest medical practioner in the history of Orthodox Medicine; it's from Imhotep's medical journals and write-ups that Western orthodox knowledge of medicine is derived.

According to the "Edwin Smith Papyrus" that which was authored by the multi-genius, he is said to have diagnosed and treated over 200 diseases in his lifetime, is amongst the first to have performed successfull surgeries and is said to have found the first ever school of Orthodox Medicine.

Its important to note the fact that Imhotep was practicing Orthodox Medicine over two thousand years before Hippocrates was born.

Imhotep is recorded as a multi-genius due to the numerous disciplines he has been found to have successfully studied and taught. i.e Architecture, Astrology, Astronomy, Engineering, Orthodox Medicine, Mathematics, Philosophy and The Physical Sciences.

The images below are depictions of The Pyramid of Djoser:

(i) Also known as the “Step Pyramid” here is a 2018 image.

(ii)A 3d model of Djoser Pyramid Complex.

budaatum:
I do not agree that the "Abrahamic religious text" are fake. To be fake implies they are copies of originals which I do not know existed, apart from the likes of Egyptian hieroglyphs and Tales about Greek and Roman Gods which preceeded it, and of which the Abrahamic religious text are not "copies" .

There isnt one character or storyline in all of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original.

All the authors of Abrahamic religious text are dubious and untrustworthy.

And yes, Abrahamic religious text are direct copies and plagerised versions of various older characters and philospohies. i.e African philosophies, Budhism, Greek mythology, Hinduism, Roman mythology, Summerian mythology e.t.c

budaatum:
As to "horrific falsities being drummed into innocent onlookers", might you want to explain what these are please?

The premise behinde the narratives being peddled by all the Abrahamic religions is false.

The notion that the Almighty God isnt African is false.

Humanity began in Africa and they went on to populate the rest of the world.

Africans are the first people in human history capable enough to perceive the Almighty God.

The Almighty God and all the true heavenly Deities and the Divinities are black, brown and bronze; are Universal.

The narrative behinde an Asian or European image of God are wholly false and misleading; they just arent plausible due to the simple understanding that suggest that noone owns the rights to the supposed image of 'God' and the fact that Africans are the first humans that God' created.

The false image of God that Abrahamic religious text are peddling, the blattant lies and fabrications contained in all of their content are part of the horific falsities refered to in the above post.

Great Nations dont have the time to be lapping up fakery, there are people on the continent that cannot wait to rise beyond greater heights.

African spirituality that which "religion" is said to immitate supposed to make one relative to virtuosness.

Virtuosness is a fun and nice quality to have.

Religion is not the problem its all the Abrahamic ones that are, they have been found out to be peddling falsities, fakery and manufactured history.

By all the universal laws under the Sun, all the Abrahamic religions are counterintuitive.

budaatum:
You are asking me to quibble about the props instead of seeing how the lessons taught with and by the props have contributed to, or at least affected, human existence, either negatively or positively.

No, not really, i'm asking you to stop pretending that Abrahamic religious text isnt fake; summon the courage to despell the horrific falsities being drummed into innocent onlookers.

I am not challenging the authencity of the original content from which they plagerised, that would have to be an altogether seperate investigation; and would be deviating from the maint point here.


The main points are that Abrahanic religious text are not what they claims to be, they are not that old as they claim and are mere bibliographies, compilation of various older religious text from all around the globe; the contents of which have been repackaged, plagerised, directly copied, sexed-up or simply ourrightly fabricated.

budaatum:
Sorry, but I refuse to be so lazy and would rather be "uncle Tom".

I strongly believe you meant differently.

Uncle Toms are those that know beyond reasonable doubt the fact that Abrahamic religions are fake, yet due to greed and the uncontrolable lust for monetary value they continue to peddle those false narratives.

Many educated and well informed pastors are infact uncle Toms, although there are those of them that are simply ignorant of truth.

The term was coined by the the founding members of the early pan African institutes during the days of African American revolution.

Assuming uncle Toms dont have the nerve or interest to put anyone on the straight path, then they're better off saying nothing at all.

No matter the quality of the borrowed content, no matter its popularity, possessing the knowledge of something being false and not only pretending that it isnt, but peddling it as though its real is indeed ethically criminal.

Uncle Toms are real scum.

I partially agree with Op on the fact that pastors that knowing exploit the innocent onlooker with a slaughsic of falsities will probably not make heavensic.

I would rather frame it that all the uncle Tom's out there have little chance of making heavensic unless they totally change their ways; and change their ways immediately.

Who are the uncle Toms?

Uncle Toms are those that know beyond reasonable doubt that of the fact that Abrahamic religions are fake, yet, due to greed and the uncontrolable lust for monetary value, continue to peddle those narratives.

The term was coined by the the founding members of the early pan African institutes during the days of African American revolution.

Eventhough those that are able to acquire vast amount of wealth by lieing through their teeth deserve a round of aplause for making themselves rich without too much of an effort; yet overall being called smart by ways of attempting to brainwash us into believing false narratives isnt really that clever but is selfish and unethical.

The authors of Abrahamic religious text lied from their very first chapter.

The Adam and Eve story is fake as it isnt original to the Abrahamic religions.

Abrahamic religious text peddle a false and fake representation of history.

Name any character or storyline in all of Abrahamic religious text and let me prove to you that they are not original.

Abrahamic religious text are copied from older concepts and philosophies, that is the reason they are fake.

Manufactured stories borrowed from numerous communitues from around the world and without any logical justification claiming to be the originator.

budaatum:
We learn in the Garden of Eden how the Word of God can be good or bad. Study, compare and contrast would make one wonder if God would keep one naked and forbid them knowledge. I just need look to the North of Nigeria to see the consequences of such policies. Then see how long Adam did "not exactly die after being kicked out of Eden", and the intellectually robust and unequivocally honest would be inclined to ask, who lied.

Adjectival lenses. That's what I call those two bolds. Lenses one wears that distorts what is there into what one wants to see. Another view is expressed with "Love God", suggesting a perspective from which to view things, which in Christianity implies, for that which is good and godly and relating to those around one.

I do not have issues with such lenses, but if you put on one with blue glass, everything will seem blue, and when the glass is red it all goes red. The intellectually robust and unequivocally honest should therefore have lots of lenses with various colours with which to view things so as not to be one coloured in their view. Or they should have eyes that work well so their views are not distorted by glass.

Try it. Remove the lens then watch these and tell me what you see.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5RfScpEcZ8


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g40Eck6gW7U


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndAnzWduwP8

The Book of Genesis is an unreliable piece of writting; that which contains the Adam & Eve story is a plagerisation of a Summerian tale.

A story that predates the combined birth dates of all the authors of Abrahamic text in years that amount in their thousands.


Can you provide me with the answer to these simple questions:

What are the nationalities of the characters inside Abrahamic religious text?

To which continent does the characters inside Abrahamic text belong?

Who are the authors of Abrahamic religious text?

Who influenced the writting of all the different types of Abrahamic religious text?

Can the authors of any of the Abrahamic religious text really be trusted?

If your answer is no, why?

If your answer is yes, why?

budaatum:
As you may have seen from above, theres nothing like "original text", since it evolved into being over time, and even if it were fiction I'd still give it more credit than you do.

I can only wonder how much of the texts you've read and understood to condemn it so much.

Abrahamic religious text should never be taken seriously.

The authors of Abrahanic text are guilty of a huge amount of criminality.

During my research into Abrahamic religious text made me have read the Bible, Torah and Quran from front to back on more than one occasion.

Many of us that have read the Christian bible does so by reading lightly or casually.

However, one is meant to not only study what we read but compare and contrast the assertions and vicious insinuations contained in their text with real history.

budaatum:
I think the Abrahamic ones are not the problem, the misunderstanding of the individual is. But I still delight in our failure, or rather, not having done enough to know and understand and just believe. The future, is Orange.

Just wondering why these books have stood the test of time and what caused them out of all the books to be flung from so far back so I can read them is worthy of my consideration. And just reading up on what some might call inanities sure influences how I understand or see it, shall I say. And its a book. Reading is good!

Below is a short trip how it got to me. You'd find it had been messed up from the start.

The Hebrew Bible, which is also called the Tanakh (/tɑːˈnɑːx/; תָּנָ״ךְ, pronounced [taˈnaχ] or the [təˈnax]; also Tenakh, Tenak, Tanach) or sometimes the Mikra, is the canonical collection of Hebrew scriptures. These texts are almost exclusively in Biblical Hebrew, except for some Biblical Aramaic passages in the books of Daniel and Ezra. The Hebrew Bible is also the textual source for the Christian Old Testament.

The Septuagint (from the Latin: septuāgintā literally "seventy"; often abbreviated as 70 in Roman numerals, i.e., LXX; sometimes called the Greek Old Testament) is the earliest extant Koine Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures.

The book of Isaiah was the most popular of all the prophetic books among the earliest Christians—it accounts for more than half the allusions and quotations in the New Testament and over half the quotations attributed to Jesus himself, and the Gospel of Matthew in particular presents Jesus's ministry as largely the fulfillment of prophecies from Isaiah. In the time of Jesus, however, the Jews of Palestine no longer spoke Hebrew, and Isaiah had to be translated into Greek and Aramaic, the two commonly used languages. In the original Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14 the word almah meant a young woman of childbearing age who had not yet given birth; however the Greek translation, the Septuagint, rendered it as parthenos, a word which means virgin. This gave the author of Matthew the opportunity to interpret Jesus as the fulfilment of the Immanuel prophecy: Jesus becomes God is with us (Matthew 1:23), the divine representative on earth, and Matthew further identifies Jesus with the Immanuel born to a parthenos by asserting that Joseph did not have sexual intercourse with Mary before she gave birth (Matthew 1:25).
[url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_7%3A14?wprov=sfla1]Gospel of Matthew[/url]

All the Abrahamic religions are a sham.

All Abrahamic text are false, fake and counterintuitive.

All the real authors of Abrahamic text are liars and fakers.

You are no different to the uncle Tom's that are amongst us, those that know of the falsities the Abrahamic religions peddle and continue to quote and peddle those same known fakery.

All the Abrahamic religious narratives are based on a false premise, those that are ignorant of these facts have a diminished responsibility whilst those that know of these facts and continue to pretend that they are real
are the worst pepertrators.

The Christian bible is a fraudulent compilation of documents.

The Christian bible is not a genuine document, rather its a bibliograpghy, a compilation of religious text from all across the globe, the contents of which have been repackaged, plagerised, copied, sexed-up or simply outrightly made up.

In order words, all Abrahamic religious text are fake and unreliable.

Religion isn’t a problem per se, it’s the Abrahamic ones that are.

budaatum:
A look at other societies that went back to consider their history would answer your question.

The rediscovery of classical Greek philosopher Protagoras (490 BC – c. 420 BC) brought us to the view a thousand years later that "Man is the measure of all things" and the 1400-1700 Renaissance which evolved into the Scientific (or Intellectual) Age we are in today. Same way Newton got his calculus from his understanding of ancient alchemy texts.

One can learn from history how things were done to emulate or decide which works and which doesn't.

The only reason for a West African to study ancient Egyptian mythology is so as to learn other aspects of African history. And to despell the falsities being peddle by all the Abrahamic religions and not as to adopt their concepts.

The Nile civilisation represents 5% of African history.

The Dogon philosophy of West Africa represents one of the oldest knowledge of Astrology and Astronomy in the world.

The understanding in Dogon philosophy has taken modern science hundreds of years to realise.

For example the Dogon people of Mali due to their accurate astronomical calculations are the first community to plot the fact that suggests Earth spins on its own axis.

Further more, the Dogon’s discovered the Sirius B star thousands of years before N.A.S.A.

A good reason another name for the Sirius B star system is the Dogon Star.

budaatum:
You might me surprised to know how much Africa there is in the Abrahamic religion. Over 400 years worth, according to books ascribed to Moses, unless you think we enslaved the body but left the mind free to think whatever it wanted. If only the Egyptians had shared their gods, says I. Or show me how that "intellectual property" might have gotten to me if they were not exploited to various whole new levels over very many centuries until it got to poor undeserving me. Or would you say I was so worthy and it would or should have gotten to me? And what form would it get to me? Carvings off the walls of the ruined Temple of Amun, perhaps, lol.

Apart from historical use, for what other reason does a West African really need to be interested in ancient Egyptian mythology.

Ancient Egyptians are a product of their own downfall.

Ancient Egypt came about as a result of African unism. Various nationalities from all across Africa especially Sudan created the super state known as KM.T, they comprised of researchers and scientists; the best of every nation volunteered to that project.

When Ancient Egypt reached unbelievable heights in the world of science and technology, they betrayed the rest of the continentals even launching numerous failed wars on the continentals, thanks to the brave and battle ready people of Sudan; world renown for their impossible accuracy with the long bow. they stopped the ancient Egyptians and their foreign allies in their tracks.

Instead of the ancient Egyptians to look inwards and share the knowledge of our own great findings, they befriended Asia and Europe and instead began to tutor them about all the wonderful inventions that our philosophical concepts produced.

They first got invaded by Persia and then over one hundred other occasions after that.

The ancient Egyptian moral is one that allows us to understand the importance of looking after one’s relatives and neighbors when things are good for us.

Because in time of need, some will be available to act as the needed reinforcement necessary to overwhelm the aggressor.

Assuming Ancient Egyptians set their priorities correctly, no invasion would ever had been successful. With their knowledge of science and the people’s raw power, with access to an unlimited amount of armies they would almost be invincible.

All aggressive armies would have been body bagged. All invasion would have fail eventually.

But the Ancient Egyptians became over confident about their military ability and got invaded more than 100 times without any allies to come to their rescue.

All their own fault.

TAO11:
Another interesting perspective to the Pyramids.

This perspective argues 'persuasively' that the pyramids were not burial tombs, but rather "power plants generating and transmitting electricity to the civilization surrounding it."

See video/link below:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko-ZboCzR64

The theory of the Great Pyramid on the Giza complex real use as a way of producing electricity is nice and plausible.

The kind of mathematical accuracy the Nubian engineering made use of is often only achievable by professional jewellers, horologists, opticians and elite watch repairers.

Those in the above profession deal with tiny gems that demand accuracy of the highest order. Yet the Nubian engineers replicate these type of accuracy making use of tons and tons of gigantic flat piece of stone or granite as the basis of the material they used in building their structures.

The Great Pyramid of Giza was built to serve as the burial location for the Pharaoh Khufu.

Not at all, there is no record of The Great Pyramid of Giza use as a tomb of anysort. There are various popular theories on the real use of Pharaoh Khufu's Pyramid, tomb isnt one of them.

These are some of the theories that are out there:

. A time machine

. A place of refuge during the times when the Nile over fills.

. A mathematical instrument.

. A helios gadget.

. An Astrologers outpost.

. A ship from another planet.

budaatum:
"Mainly known" by whom....

All the Abrahamic religions are mainly known by genuine historians for those type of West Asian and Eurocentric practises due to the fact that they took their exploitation of intellectual property to a whole new level.

realmindz:
grabs chair....front seat.

This gonna be gud


I have always had a view the pyramids weren't built by mere humans neither were they built to bury mummies or for decoration or whatever.

The science and theory behind it is too advanced and complicated for mere ancient cave men.
The mathematics behind the location on the earth surface is perplexing that it leaves the ignorant to believe the pyramid is just an ordinary monument. it makes the delusioned weep for knowledge especially those that are so delusioned to think the Israelite slaves built them

Precisely, Africans are responsible for the invention of mathematics.

The Great Pyramids on the Giza complex are built out of what is known in mathematics as the golden ratio also called the golden mean or golden section.

In mathematics, two quantities are said to be in the golden ratio once their ratio is the same as the ratio of their sum to the larger of the two quantities.

Expressed algebraically, for quantities a and b with a > b > 0;

(a+b)/a = (a/b) ≡φ (where φ represents the golden ratio.)

The golden ratio is an irrational number that is a solution to the quadratic equation

x2−x−1=0.

φ= x=1±5√2 = 1.6180339887

African scientific concepts that Euclid of Alexandria and Pythagoras would later introduce to West Asians and Europe.

The African are the scientists that proved the Pythagorean theorem, they taught Pythagoras and he went back to Greece and they (the Greeks) would later claim the theorem as though it was their own.

Guru10450:
The fabled Libraries at Alexandria was commisioned by the Persian (Persia is modern day Iran) known as Alexander of Macedon.

Basically, most of clasified Khemetic intellectual property was kept and studied upon.

Greeks conquered Ancient Egypt and continued the ongoing foreign exploit of the people of Khemet and their lands; forming their own dynasty called the Ptolemaic Dynasty that ruled Ancient Egypt for nearly 300 years until 30 B.C.E.

At its peak, around 240 B.C.E Ptolemaic's Ancient Egypt expanded to control Libya, Palestine, Cyprus, and much of eastern Mediterranean Sea.

In 30 B.C.E the Romans took control of Ancient Egypt and ruled for over 600 years until 640 C.E

Eventually, the libraries became connected to a place of higher learning similar to modern day Technical, Polytechnics and Universities. Some of the more famous students include: Aristotle; Euclid; Diodorus; Herodotus; Hippocrates; Plato; Pythagoras; Socrates; Strabo e.t.c

Thales, Solon, Plato and Eudoxus all part of the earlier students, they studied in Egypt prior to the commisioning of The Libraries at Alexandria.

A famous Roman Emperor confirmed what is written above, stating that:

"If one would document the amount of Greek and Roman academics that visited ancient Egypt for the purpose of learning, their names would not be able to fit inside a book with 1,000 pages"

In those days, if you didnt study under the stewardship of Khemetic priest then you couldnt learn the basic fundamentals of the Arts, Commerce or Sciences and wouldnt really amount to much in olden day Greece.

Every single Greek that became famous during the so called "Greek Miracle", have studying under the People of Kemit as a common factor.

Put disposable liquidity to good use.

Those who aspire to become the wealthiest people on the planet dont leave disposable liquidity lying around in the kitchen sink or on the floor, they put to good use.

. Invest in a profitable venture.

. Open a savings account with bi-periodical/periodical restrictions.

. Open a simple savings account with no additional restrictions.

. Open savings account to fund one's offspring(s) education.

. Open a savings account to fund the period leading to pension.

. Open a savings account to fund pension.

These measures taken up in any order should assist anyone towards becoming financially stable and finacially savvy.

Riches is a mere tool towards betterment of ones and those around one's standard of living?

They say "health is wealth".

Yes, take care of ones health and everyone would call us the wealthiest person on the planet.

Riches is goodsic, wealth is better.

Focus our resources on staying healthy and one stands the chance of becoming the wealthiest person ever.

budaatum:
You decide whether religion makes you virtuos or not. But imagine what the rest of us would have been like if we had not been religionised at all.

Hint: Education as we know it today evolved from religion

I agree with the spirit of your post, in a way education can be said to evolve out of religion. I totally get that.

Western eductaion produced manufactured religion.

In actual fact, African spirituality is that which brought about religion.

Religion can aswell be defined as the mimicking of African philosophical concepts.

All manufactured religions are malicious imitations of African spirituality. i.e Abrahamic, Greek, Red Indian, Roman, Summerian e.t.c

Most of the narratives peddled by the above religions incoporate into their text various adaptations of our continental iconic characters and philosophical concepts.

Although the Abrahamic religions are mainly known for these type of West Asian and Eurocentric practises due to the fact that they took their exploitation of intellectual property to a whole new level.

The authors of Abrahamic religious text demonised the source of their copied continental philosophies and bastardise the content.

What most of us dont realise is the fact that most African philosphies are amongst the only verifiable religioussic concepts in living history; and are universally considered as a part of true history.

Similar to the view of other contributors, i disagree with the notion that all types of faith are delusional.

Faith is only delusional when its built on a false asumption that something is true.

"Once a premise is false, then the conclusion is said also to be false"

cited quote is an extract from [url]wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise[/url]

Ignorance isnt said to be bliss on its own accord, yet, once one is able to perceive truth, then ignorance cannot be used as an excuse anymore.

All Abrahamic religions peddle a false representation of history.

EmperorHarry:
Faith is required when dealing with things,knowledge, concepts etc independent of our senses& self.Faith becomes delusional when you refuse to accept any alternate perspective that doesn't align with yours.

Totally agree with you here.

Apart from the accurate analysis potrayed by the above contributor, it can also be explained by making use of "faith" in a sentence so as to mean "confidence".

As in,

(a1) I have absolute faith in the Almighty God.

(a2) I have absolute confidence in the Almighty God.


(b1) I have faith in my skills and abilities as a medical practitioner.

(b2) I have confidence in my skills and abilities as a medical practitioner.

All the Abrahamic religions are a sham.

If religion means Abrahamic religions, then religion is bad and should be banned anywhere on the African continent.

On the other hand, if religion means the experiencing, aspiring and working towards virtuousness; an attempt to attain a high moral and ethical standard, then religion is a nice and cool invention.

Religion is supposed to make us relative to virtuousness.

Virtue is a nice and fun quality to have.

All the authors of Abrahamic religious text are untustworthy, dubious, liars and fakers; and are never the virtuous type.

Just to be clear, i'm not here to blame the loveable, virtuous Christians or Muslims amongst us.

Trust me, a book with a thousand pages wouldnt contain the amount of genuinely nice, ethical and morally correct people that are known to me as adherents of the above faiths.

Ignorance isnt a crime or a fault on its own accord, yet, once one is able to perceive truth, then ignorance cannot be used as an excuse anymore.

Yet, the notion that the Jesus is a real and genuine person is false.

The Romans manufactured Christianity and invented all their characters out of the plagerisation of older religious characters and concepts from all around the globe.

The Muhamnedian movement manufactured Islam and invented their characters out of the same plagerisation of older religious characters as the Romans, as a result of Roman philosophical domination of West Asia at the time.

Keep our virtuousness, get rid of the negative impact from all the Abrahamic religions.

Relative to our recent history, it makes no sense whatsoever for an African to be worshiping or honouring anything coming out of either West Asia or Europe.


Lets take a look at a hyperthetical scenario below:

An armed robber loots belongings at the dead of night and returns the next morning preaching some goblydegook about how to become a virtuous human being.

For me, i would shoot the returning armed robber first and ask questions later. Never in a million years would i be willing to listen to his/her mumbojumbo about anything until my belongings are fully recovered.

Even after assuming the ability to succesfully recover ones's belongings, it would be counterintuitive and outrightly wrong to then be sourcing any sort of moral or ethical expeditions from such a thieving character.

Similar to all the other Abrahamic relugious text out there, the Bible is a propagandist tool; a silent weapon of mass destruction.

How does 66 Books of the Bible in Audio format assist us in defeating Colonisation and Oppression?

How?

The Bible is not what it claims to be, instead its a bibliography of various older religious text and typologies from all across the globe the contents of which have been repackaged, plagerised, sexed-up, or outrightly fabricated.

There isnt one character or storyline present in all of Abrahamic religious text that can claim to being original.

Let's assume for one second (eventhough they arent real) that the Abrahamic narrative is real, then the people that need to follow such measures peddled by Abrahamic religious text are the inhabitants of Western Asia and all the Eurocentrics.

According to the current statistics, more than 50% of West Asians and Eurocentrics are neither Christian, Jew or Muslim.

Africans arent a guilty people, are relatively peaceful and unlike West Asia and Europe, have not been seen to disturb or distrupt human progress.

Africans are responsible for the progress of humanity more than any peoples on the planet; the positive impact on human progress made by Africans is more than what Asians, Australasians, Europeans and The Americas have done combined.

These are what Africans need to be reading and studying upon and not an implausible manufactured history coming out of either Asia or Europe.

Keep hold onto our virtuousness, get rid of all the Abrahamic religions.

Abrahamic religious text peddle a false and fake representation of history.

Abrahamic religious text are copied from older concepts and philosophies from across the globe, that is the reason they are fake.

Manufactured stories borrowed from numerous communitues from around the world and without any logical justification claiming to be the originator.

All Abrahamic religious text are fake, false and counterintuitive.

I agree 100% with Op that Africans live a better live than most Americans.

That isnt guess work but a matter of fact.

Abrahamic religions peddle a false intepretation of the image of God.

The Almighty God IS African. IS universal.

Everyone knows that humanity began in Africa therefore the narrative of the Asian or European image of God is utterly false.