ArtanK's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ArtanK's Profile › ArtanK's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 32 pages)
muafrika: @ArtanK, I once came across one politically incorrect blog trying to prove the book of Genesis with anthropology. Any who, she writes about a prehistoric kingdom of Kush, split in two, one in northern Africa and the other in the middle East. They were founded by two brothers. The Dinka/Nuer ascertain themselves as descendants of the kingdom of Kush, which leaves you, Somalis-and I suspect, other cushitic people as you share the same spirit(the charcteristic cross eye of most cushites that would allude to an East Asian mix, in addition to neighbouring peoples) having back migrated into Africa in recent history as the most likely other half of the Kingdom.That's absurd man come on. Keywords: incorrect and blog. Anyone can jot something down on a blog and claim that it's scientific research. Genetics prove that Somalis and other Cushtic groups in the Horn are closer to the Berbers of North Africa despite living just next door to Nilotic people. |
muafrika: @ArtanK, And long limbs, slender bone structure, and for some of you, an exeptionally dark chocolate colour, like the Orma who keep fighting with the Pokomo Bantu farmers.Our elongated body shapes doesn't prove that we are half Nilotic and half Arab though |
muafrika: @ArtanK, its history and your genetics puts you with the sudanese.If you're talking about the Cushtic Beja in Sudan, you're correct but if you're insinuating that many Somalis are mixed thus makes them similar to the mixed Sudanese Arabs then you are incorrect mate. The only thing we have in common is Islam. |
muafrika: Fulaman198: Of course like other cushites, you intermarried with nilotes, plus, west African is not an identity. Tutsies of Rwanda are related to you, and I suspect the Somali and few other East African tribes masquerading as bantu. This seems to be the history of subsaharan Africa. The Bantu subded the pygmy and hottentots, and were in turn overun by Arabic/Cushitic nomadic invaders who usurped their estabished systems and language, after which European colonialists subdued them all, and on our fake indepence, they instituted puppet governments of the previously subdued. Only Ethiopia escaped colonialism.What kind of tomfoolery is this? Somalis are not half Arab and half Nilotic. |
Laya: Their genetics put them right in east Africa, going by their genetics unless they migrated to MadagascarI'm not disputing that, just stating their version of their history. It is no secret that they are a confederacy though, there are many Somali & Afar clans who are classed as Oromo in Ethiopia. |
Germany won't be alone on this smh |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: So it's no longer Mozambique ? it's now northern Kenya LFMaoYou knucklehead, I know you're francophone but wtf, can your tiny brain compute simple English or nah? Somalis were raiding and conquering so much land from bantus that they had complained to their British Massa and if your British Massa hadn't stopped us, you would have been crying from Mozambique today.That's what I said. I never said we took Mozambique. If you can't understand that then there is no point of debating with you. And tell me what lies you've caught me out on? 1. You said Somalis lived in present day Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi and etc around 1000 BC and the Bantu migrants took their land. That's a lie. At that time Somalis lived in the Northern part of Ethiopia. 2. You said that the Bantu taught the cushites how to farm and so on. That's a lie. It was the southern Cushites who taught the Bantu about crop cultivation, irrigation, livestock husbandry and many other things... Basically how to farm properly. 3. You said that we (Somalis) never took land from the Bantu. That's a lie. I've shown you a credible source that clearly states that the Garre Somali pushed Bantu people from the river Juba to deep inside Kenya. I'll be back soon though, I'll show you multiple sources describing exactly how we conquered the land and which Somali clans that did it. ![]() |
@ CAMNEWTON4PRES & @ osystein I'll be back with more books for you guys to read (about how we conquered south Somalia and north eastern Kenya in less than 200 years soon). |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: Kenya 1974? right lmfa you are a joke this is a doctored pictureThere are almost 3 million Somalis in that region and less than half a million are refugees. They are going back to good old Jubbaland now that Alshabab is gone. You were the one who started talking about Somalis first mate then when I proved that we came from the North you switched it to Cushites. I'm a proud Cushite and if Bantus had displaced a few of us thousands of years ago, it was only because the Somalis weren't present. We were too busy fighting with the Habesha in Ethiopia and Eritrea. You mention Italians colonising Somalis LOL every Tom, Dick and Harry knows that certain Somali clans sought for help from the Italians so they could defend themselves from other powerful clans. The Dervish warriors fought against the British, Ethiopians and Italians and all three enemies had Somalis soldiers and generals working for them because it wasn't in their best interest. You can also keep on repeating that Somalis are uncivilised but the fact is we were a monumental part of the greatest civilisations to ever grace the African continent. |
osystein: My guy, in all the regions that the bantus expanded to, they occupy the most fertile regions, the arid parts is the land they left for the alians cause they have no interest in it.Left it or chased out? Check my reply to your Bantu friend. Bantu people were present in lands north of the river Jubba in Somalia before the Galla and Somalis descended upon them. ![]() The land between Somalia's main rivers Shabelle and Jubba is arable land. Just to give you an idea where the rivers are located.. https://www.somwe.com/riverbasins.jpg Now where is the border between Somalis and Bantus today? |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: I will b waiting for you tomorrow or another day , be sure that I will answer ...I will pat more recent news about somalians begging Bantu for food and Somalian women trying to put their bastards children on Bantu soldiersLOL! Are we talking about women now? Weak guy lmao. The one woman who married a Ugandan soldier doesn't represent all Somali women. If you wanna talk about women, I suggest you have a word with Axum/Ajuran. But anyways you can read here how the Oromo + Garre, Darod and other Somali clans pushed the Bantus from the Jubba river(some 200 km) inside Somalia to past the river Tana in Kenya. It is suggested that Garre or proto-Garre Somali gained control of the area between the Juba and the Tana rivers before the Galla arrived in this area, and that in the process the Garre were responsible for pushing Bantu-speaking peoples back to the river Tana. However, it is also argued that the area initially controlled by Bantu-speaking peoples in the Horn of Africa was much more limited than is generally assumed. It is then suggested that around the sixteenth century the Orma Galla migrated to the coast from southern Ethiopia via the Lorian Swamp and the river Tana and not by the river Juba as is generally argued. The arrival of the Orma led to a further retreat of Bantu-speaking peoples towards the Sabaki river, and then to a retreat of the Somali northwards in the direction of the Juba river. In this way the nineteenth-century Somali drive southwards can be seen to some extent as a reconquest of land occupied earlier by them.Source: The Journal of African History (1975) by E. R Turton. Not only did we take land from the Bantu but also from the Galla who outnumber Somalis immensely. The Somali expansion in the south began in 1805. ![]() You keep repeating that Ethiopia and Somalia is a dry and barren land. Have you forgotten that it was the Bantu slaves that worked on the Somali farms in South Somalia? And you must be put of your mind if you think that Ethiopia is barren. Less than 20% of the land is a desert, the rest is covered with green and lush valleys. |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: keep on dreaming , so now it's riots not conquests lmfaomlike I said all empires have faced raids ..that's the best the Somalian could, it only shows that the wealthy Bantu dominated you and u resorted to raiding ,furthermore Bantu kingdoms were trading with European countries so them asking assistance from British navy is what it is assistance not playing massaLmao @ the bolded. I'm done here tonight, I'll see you tomorrow night. |
@CAMNEWTON4PRES I will post the accounts of Bantus crying to the British about Somalis tomorrow. Prepare yourself my Bantu friend you won't like it ![]() |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: http://willmore.net/fall_of_zimbabwe.htmAdmit it you just have this chip on your shoulder, since you didn't take any land from Somalis you decided to talk about Iraqws and weak little cushtic tribes who by the way are still present in Tanzania. LOL I'm talking to you as a Somali while you're crying " but the Bantu are strong" all the way from Cameroon ![]() Feast your eyes on this https://www.ecoi.net/file_upload/3256_1368625639_kenya-ethnic-1974.jpg Half of it is cushtic ![]() |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: Little correction 900BCE do you know how old that is ?You don't get it do you. Although you were as you claim 'masters of the metal' we still took your land with metal. Where were the mighty Bantu when a couple of thousand Somali horsemen ran riots in your lands? |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: So you left Tanzania ,Uganda ,Kenya to attack Mozambique?Just because you don't understand English, I will repeat it in simple English. Somalis were raiding and conquering so much land from bantus that they had complained to their British Massa and the British Massa hadn't stopped us, you would have been crying from Mozambique today. But don't worry we are not like the southern cushites, Somalis only conquer land and we don't lose. For the millionth time Somalis are newcomers to South Somalia and Kenya so of course I'm talking about recent history. |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: We introduced iron and metal tools and weapons in eastern ,southern and central Africa , so you boasting or bragging about swords and spears is funny, because when we found you ,you guys were using stones and sticks , while Bantu blacksmith were making weapons around 500BCE. You keep confirming what have been said here, we civilized you. Now say thank youWhat a guy Lmao swords are made out of metal in case you didn't know that. The reference that osystein presented even stated that southern cushites had complex civilisations in those regions. |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: don't eat your tongue, funny guy, now they are Khoisan who were absorbed by Cushitic ,do you even understand what that implies ? For you to absorb any Khoisan groups it means you lived in southern Africa and present , now there are no more cushitic anywhere in southern Africa so what does that tell ...your guess is good as mine knowing well that the Bantu are 99% of southern AfricaOk I may have been wrong on one occasion but hey you were the one who claimed that you brought civilisation to the 'wild Somalis'. When I proved to you that we came from up north you changed it to we taught Cushites how to farm and build irrigation systems. You were wrong on both occasions. The fact is Bantu's have never conquered any land from Somalis, history proves that we conquered thousands of miles with a few good horsemen, swords and spears. Furthermore Bantus would have been complaining to the British from Mozambique if they hadn't stopped our expansion. |
Laya: Some Oromo said the name "Galla" was given to them by the Amharas, which the Oromos view as derogatory, and thatThe Oromo themselves claim they were originally from Madagascar and they migrated to Ethiopia and Kenya gradually. The name Oromo was first used by historians a couple of centuries ago despite the Oromo being older than the Somalis, they were called Galla or Gaallo/Gaalmadow (btw we gave them that name) while famous historians wrote about Somalis as far back as the 11th century. |
osystein: here 's a linkAlthough it is not a viable reference, I've done some research myself and it turns out that the Iraqw and other groups are cushtic. I always thought they were Khoisan, they could be one of those khoisan groups that was absorbed by the southern cushites before the Bantu migration but that's just a speculation. |
Laya: HA HA..that's all you got? you are a real simpletonIgnore him. This troll is pretending to be Somali. |
osystein: You mean proof that the were cushitic language speakers in Tanzania before the arrival of the bantu speakers, or that they were displaced?Both please. osystein: Khoisan didn't move southwards, there were already khoisan in the southern region, like cushites, those in south east africa were displaced and absorbed by the bantus. Ofcoz there're still khoisan people and cushites in the region (south east africa ), but their numbers reduced after the arrival of the bantu speakers.The Khoisan groups in south east Africa moved southwards after the Bantu migration. |
Fulaman198: The more you use something, the better you guys will get at it. The Arabs, Russians (and other Slavic people), the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. etc. never lost their script. It may take time, but it's more than possible to go back to it.True, I truly hope we go back to it soon. |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: khoisan are in the southern part, what about the eastern part ?just tell me Tanzania, Kenya,uganda, Burundi etc were empty and we will call it a dayKhoisan peeps moved southwards because of Bantu migrations. Why can't you prove that Bantus displaced Cushites in southern east Africa? |
Fulaman198: Artan, are you able to read your script?No adopting this script will be very difficult. |
Bororojo: This looks like some other version of Ge'ez ......In my opinion, it looks like it was influenced by this version of Somali script that was used in the north west and Djibouti (E-soul's peeps). https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/43/Borama-script.gif |
osystein: The bantus absorbed and displaced cushites in Tanzania, Somalis are not the only cushites.Proof? |
Sorry walal, I didn't see this post. EnlightenedSoul: 1) What was the last book you read? |
Omarbah: I think the latin script with minor modifications is good. Whichever Alphabet is used doesn't really matter in my opinion as long as Somali study in their language.I'd rather get rid of the Latin alphabet completely. Changing our script would teach the younger generations to be proud of their heritage (not that Somalis are lacking in pride lol). |
CAMNEWTON4PRES: Okay so that means prior the Arabs you had no alphabet or script right? No texts/books eitherSomali people too, but because most clans had their own kingdom/sultanate/geradship we had multiple scripts. The Latin orthography was only adopted in 1972. There is hope of bringing back those lost scripts, I hope that happens sometime soon. This is called Osmanya and it was used by my clan in the north east. [img]http://www.afrikanistik-aegyptologie-online.de/archiv/2010/2723/dippArticle-14.jpg[/img] |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 32 pages)

adopting this script will be very difficult.