₦airaland Forum

Keballl:
If this is your trap please let me [size=14pt]LOL[/size], cos your trap can't even cage a sandfly. I will destroy you.

We resorted to buying from Ukraine and Russia when the US government refused selling weapons to us citing human rights abuse. Heck, the Northern Governors contributed to that mess in writing.

The 98% failure is only resident in the brains of zombies alike. The indisputable fact is that despite BH threats of causing carnage if the election held in that region. Elections held and the people voted their choice without intimidation not fear from non state actors.

A technically defeated groups shouldn't be seen causing Military personnel to be missing in such high numbers. Unless, you are indirectly accepting that the deliberate propaganda of this admin is losing steam. There is always a limit to lies.

"80%" of this people are back to their base simply because they did rather be responsible fir themselves than starve to death in those concentration camps while been given grass to eat. Whereas Buhari and his entourage of thieves allocated 270 million to cut grass in those camps.

A few days ago, returning IDPs were killed in a mine incident and here you are bragging aimlessly.

Let's see your next trap. LOL and kindly show me the weapons Buhari bought in 2015 that was used to technically defeat BH

So for 6 years you waited for US before going to Ukraine? it makes you look more stupid because we Nigerians know the clueless team was forced by the Buhari factor to suddenly come to their senses , and inorder to deceive foolish people said they were suspending elections for 6 weeks and suddenly BH was defeated! nonsense! So how come weapons could suddenly be bought ?
US ain't stupid. no sane persons or nation who knows the involvement of GEJ with Alimodu Sheriff and the deliberate sabotage of the Chibok by the clueless fools won't think twice before giving awesome weapons to such nests of killers.

That we can expose N270m IDP scandal under Buhari is a positive move in Nigeria's march to freedom unlike in the past when stealing $ 6 b defence budget or $15m spousal medical adventure ain't corruption!

In recognition of the fact that BH had planted hundreds of mines under the IB nose , US government donated 24 armoured vehicles to our military under Buhari few days ago. That is called goodwill that the Clueless rogues squandered especially when the whole had supported the drunkard to defeat the so called cabal for him to become acting President and later elected .

Keballl:
You are indeed a true zombie. How did elections hold in Borno if BH wasn't pegged back drastically.

The T72 anti mine resistant tanks bought from Ukraine that wrecked havoc on BH truck mounted guns were bought with cowries right?

Show me the weapons Buhari bought in 2015 ?

As we speak, 83 of our soldiers are missing after this imbec1lic released hardcore BH extremist into the battle arena.

You aren't talking to fools son.

right into my trap wailer and aint taking no POW. So after 6 years clueless suddenly discovered that weapons could be bought from Ukraine when the heat of his imminent defeat was staring him in the face? oh when the Defacto President unitarily suspended d state for 6 weeks under d f......cking excuse that election could no longer hold , that administration was already dead and that wash of procuring 2% out of 100% needed weapon can only be reckoned with by only frauds and cheats? so what happens to the 98% if u ain't fraudulent? So to you 98% failure na a pass? 20 million displaced North Easterners spoke with votes against that fraud of a tactical defeat by una clueless team. 80% of these displaced persons are back to their normal lives ,communities and businesses unlike the hell that una tactical fraud left them before PMB came in 2015.

Our ,true Nigerians, hearts goes to the 83 soldiers and their families for the sacrifices they are making for peace for others to enjoy. Such casualty is expected in war situations. This sad accident is better than a deliberate attempt to murder more than 1000 soldiers by the clueless administration for protecting the integrity of this country against rogues in power.
so who be the real zombie?

Keballl:
Your zombiesm no get rival. We aren't deluded that there wasn't embezzlements. This is Nigeria where even President Buhari and his entourage of thieves are corrupt.

The same sub standard weapons was used to technically defeat BH.

Una no get shame at all.

some of you are sooo ignorant and instead of learning or humbly beg to be guided, you go public displaying your obvious 2015 loss madness. maybe you ain't aware PMB started buying weapons when he came in 2015? n d little attempt at bringing in weapons by d clueless GEJ administration was charade that even came too late after the whole world had condemned his criminal cluelessness. You think we have forgotten Oritsajafor $15m South Africa money laundry in the name of buying arms? Abi how our soldiers were being killed and were subsequently arrested to be executed for protesting that there were no weapons to face boko haram until God sent PMB? Why didn't GEJ defeat BH until PMB came? No you can't false history.

Keballl:
Only ediots and zombies believe no arms was bought. It's more intelligent to say some funds were embezzled and arms ridiculously overprized.

Now let the FG release this report.

so una agree say dem embezzled some money? of course substandard weapons were bought. So were substandard equipment what was budgeted for? I pity some of una.

see waste of time and money. abeg make her lawyer chop some of d stolen money too, after all naa our money.

It is good for the health of our nation. It is not by force but an opportunity to serve ones fatherland. But it would have been nice if they had been informed or consulted so that the issues involved , e.g if they are presently free or could sacrifice their present engagements, would have been resolved. No matter what, it is nice that our tribe of politicians can turn down appointments; am I missing something?

OP but I disagree totally with your last paragraphs,
" Yes,
some people must have suffered
enough during campaign and
election but their rewards is not
only through appointments or
contracts. They should know that
what they did is a sacrifice to
their nation for the enjoyment of
their children, grandchildren, and
grand-grandchildren to come."

1. Are you telling me there are no competent persons among the party members to head some of these posts?
2. Presently there many incompetent non APC members but friends of Mamman Daura heading posts . So why did competent folks make sacrifice for the party to successfully emerge? So that incompetent PDP or Daura friends can be in power?
3. A good General disciplines and takes good care of his soldiers especially after winning a war for it engenders trust, loyalty, and a strong commitment to a shared dream. Anything contrary has serious consequences which Aisha Buhari is trying to prevent. God bless Nigeria.

Was money budgeted for arms by GEJ to fight insurgency? Yes. were the arms bought ? Nope. As a result, was the security of this country compromised? Yes, we lost lives ,properties, goodwill and resources. Do we know to whom mandates were given to oversee and administer these funds ? Yes .
PMB has been too nice to these guys. We want them to face Justice ASAP.

hehehehe ipob cheeesoz, useless thugnor!

walex2 you are very correct but abeg remove Amaechi name from that post. I know you had wanted to type Wike and Fayoshe .

hmmmm, it breaks my heart that a once peaceful town like Godogodo is being turned to hell. It is only a naive person who won't know that Agwan Nizom could be an easy target. It is alone in the bush and would take a bike ride of about15 minutes from Godogodo which makes prone to easy attacks ......were the youth there sleeping when war stares them in the face? relying on security men who were probably in Gidan waya or Golgofa....mtchew.

It was Zankan ,now Godogodo. where next? where is our humanity?

omenka:
Typical primitive accumulation by a kleptomaniac. What exactly does he need all those vehicles for??

I bet in no time, he'd become adopted as another "Hero" of PDP supporters since they are known only for one thing- cheerleaders for criminals and terrorists.

' Alase naa Helo' .

omenka:
Lmao. You've not heard anything. Mucus, that's what they've got upstairs. One even said I am Modath.

hehehehe....ipob no go kill person!

jasysandra:
reading this and wondering, how did you get to the point of being so comfortable with it? Soul travel I mean. Have experienced it twice now and praying it never happens again. Though I'm told i will get use to it and start learning things beyond our physical world but i never asked for it. I know people go through some stage spiritually to get to the point of leaving their body and some do conscious practices too. My first was scary as hell, visited places and did few research to know what was wrong with me and I was told it might happen again and it did and I'm scared it will again so I wonder how you enjoy it.

please read Maria Corelli's Romance of Two worlds . maybe you may have a rethink. You don't know how jealous I'm right now.

awesomely revealing!

Enhen.

My most sincere condolences Mr Strongbest. May God give you the strength to manage the gap that this transition leaves, amen.

If Julius Caesar, GEJ, Gaddafi, and many leaders to whom history have not been very kind could have had an Aisha Buhari in their lives, hmmm maybe they would have rewritten history positively. Very few lucky beings can see their heavensent angels, and here his guardian angel is before him and I'm not sure if PMB could see her and the blessings she brings. Who is PMB true friend ? who can tell me please? does he know Brutus ,Daura , too would stab him while the Ides of Nigeria political March comes? Beware PMB for your very essence is in serious jeopardy by the very strange companies thou had willingly(?) surrendered thy care. I thought thou hath learnt from the assumptions from previous occupiers of the very throne thou mount presently; simply the ability to hear correctly the real feelings of thy people. Aisha's sobs from the BBC kitchen and the 'azer' rooms ,walahi, is the true feelings of Nigerians that Daura keep away from thee. Why? Under the guise of the dark and a mask, go to streets of Funtua, Abuja, Owerri, Warri ,Ibadan and Lagos to harvest these feelings thyself, and tell me if thou won't make a deity of AishaBuhari?

But know this my lord PMB, I won't ask nobody but you for my sovereignty which I had willingly submitted to thee and not any cabal on the day of referendum. For thou presently seem not to bear no resemblance to GMB whom we all know or knew? Oooh God please continue to bless Aisha and guide her . amen.

hi amicable09, I saw yr reaction to the Clinton-Trump post. I can't edit the article till evening wen I ll b wt my system ....n this phone can't presently. Hope you are good? see u in d 'azer' room. cheers .

Simply elegant. Congrats Madam.

Trump v Clinton: Who won the
presidential debate?
Anthony Zurcher

North America reporter,BBC
20 October 2016

From the section US Election
2016

This may have been the debate
Donald Trump wanted, but it
wasn't the one he needed.
With one last chance to make a
pitch to the American public that
he should be trusted with the
presidency, the Republican
nominee had to make efforts to
expand his base of support.
He had to find a way to distance
himself from the allegation that he
has a history of sexual
harassment.
He had to position himself as the
change candidate - [b]just days after
a Fox poll showed that Hillary
Clinton, whose party has held the
presidency for eight years, was
beating him on the question of
who would "change the country
for the better".
Instead, after a roughly half an
hour of something resembling an
actual policy debate about the
Supreme Court, gun rights,
abortion and even immigration,
the old Donald Trump - the one
who constantly interrupted his
opponent, sparred with the
moderator and lashed out at
enemies real and perceived -
emerged.
He called Mrs Clinton a liar and a
"nasty woman".
He said the women accusing him
of sexual harassment bordering
on assault were either attention-
seekers or Clinton campaign
stooges.
He said the media were
"poisoning the minds" the public.
And, most notably, he refused to
say whether he would accept the
results of the election if he loses.
Mrs Clinton had her own moments
where she was put in the
defensive - on her emails, on the
Clinton Foundation and on
embarrassing details revealed in
the WikiLeaks hack.
The difference, however, is that
Mrs Clinton largely kept her poise
and successfully changed the
topic back to subjects where she
was more comfortable. It was, in
fact, a master class in parry-and-
strike debate strategy.
The key takeaway from this
debate, however - the headline
that Americans will wake up to
read in the morning - will certainly
be Mr Trump's refusal to back
way from his "rigged" election
claims.
That was what Mr Trump wanted[/b]
to say, but it isn't something the
American people - or American
democracy - needed to hear.

The Russian gambit


Mrs Clinton's skill at deflecting
attacks and baiting Mr Trump into
unhelpful answers first was on
display when moderator Chris
Wallace brought up a line from
one of her Wall Street speeches -
revealed in the Wikileaks hack -
that she endorsed a hemispheric
free-trade and open-immigration
zone.
After saying she was only talking
about an open energy market - an
assertion that seems somewhat
questionable - she tried to turn
the question into a discussion of
whether Mr Trump would
renounce the Russian government,
which US officials have said is
behind the cyber-attack.
Mr Trump actually called Mrs
Clinton out on her attempted
"great pivot" - but then he went on
to get bogged down on the
Russian issue.
He said he'd never met Mr Putin
(although he boasted during a
primary debate that he had talked
with him in a television green
room), and said that Mrs Clinton
was a liar and the real Russian
"puppet".
Oh, and this all came up when the
debate topic was supposed to be
immigration.

A bad experience


Mrs Clinton's next chance to pull
a rhetorical switch-a-roo came
during the economic portion of
the debate. After a discussion of
their tax proposals - and a
predictable exchange of
allegations over who's cutting and
who's raising them too much - Mr
Trump went after Mrs Clinton on
her past support of trade deals.
When she waffled a bit, he tried to
tag her with a line he used in an
earlier debate with some success.
Why didn't Mrs Clinton enact her
economic reforms over her 30
years in the public sphere? Mr
Trump asked.
"You were very much involved in
every aspect of this country," he
said. "And you do have
experience. I say the one thing
you have over me is experience,
but it's bad experience, because
what you've done has turned out
badly."
The problem with reusing attack
lines is that sometimes your
opponent prepares a defence -
and Mrs Clinton had a scathing
response ready to fly.
She said that while she was
defending children's rights in the
1970s, Mr Trump was defending
himself against charges he
engaged in housing discrimination
against African-Americans.
When Mrs Clinton was speaking
out for women's rights as first
lady in the 1990s, Mr Trump was
taunting a beauty contest winner
about her weight. And when she
was in the White House situation
room watching the raid on Osama
bin Laden's compound, Mr Trump
was hosting a television reality
show.
"I'm happy to compare my 30
years of experience, what I've
done for this country, trying to
help in every way I could,
especially kids and families get
ahead and stay ahead, with your
30 years," she said.
"I'll let the American people make
that decision."
It was a scripted set-piece, yes,
but it drew blood.



Women trouble


[b] Quick on the heels of the
exchange about experience came
the question Mr Trump had to
expect - but didn't appear ready
for. What did he think of all the
women who had come forward
since the last debate to allege
that, when it came to sexual
harassment, Mr Trump's actions
matched his candid words in that
recently revealed recording?
The Republican nominee's
response was that the women
were either attention-seekers or
Clinton campaign stooges and that
the allegations have been "largely
debunked" - which, when you
think about it, isn't exactly a
blanket denial.
In the last debate, Mrs Clinton
appeared to hold back a bit in her
condemnation of Mr Trump on the
topic.
This time - perhaps inspired by
First Lady Michelle Obama's well-
received speech condemning Mr
Trump last week - was much
sharper.
topic to her private
email server. "Donald thinks belittling women
makes him bigger," she said.
"He goes after their dignity, their
self-worth, and I don't think there
is a woman anywhere who doesn't
know what that feels like. So we
now know what Donald thinks and
what he says and how he acts
toward women. That's who Donald
is."[/b]
Mr Trump's response, that no one
respects women more than he
does, was met by laughter in the
debate hall and the nearby media
hall.
Mrs Clinton brushed off his efforts
to turn the
He may have lost this election
even without the live-mic
revelation two weeks ago, but it's
becoming increasingly clear his
campaign has been irreparably
wounded by it.

Cracked foundation
[b]
During the presidential "fitness"
portion of the debate, Wallace had
some pointed questions for Mrs
Clinton, as well.
He asked her to defend the
Clinton Foundation against
allegations it was a pay-to-play
organisation that granted insider
access to the state department in
exchange for big-money
donations.
Mrs Clinton responded by
defending the foundation's actions
- noting its high ratings from non-
profit watchdogs and its global
health efforts.
Mr Trump called it a "criminal
enterprise" - but then Mrs Clinton
was able to push the conversation
to Mr Trump's foundation, which
has had its own share of
controversies.
She noted that Mr Trump had used
foundation money to purchase a
six-foot portrait of himself. "Who
does that?" she asked.
Mr Trump tried to defend himself,
but Wallace wouldn't let him off
the hook, asking him why he used
charitable money to settle a fine
levied on his Florida resort.
The Republican's response was
only that the money had gone to
charity.
An exchange on the Clinton
Foundation could have been -
perhaps should have been - a
winning moment for Mr Trump.
Instead, it was another
opportunity for Mrs Clinton to
knock him off his stride.[/b]

DesChyko:
Okay. So, your best answer to


is



Take Mazi Omenuko's advice on the first page. There are cheap alternatives all around.

that what? You know, I suffer wise folks alone.

exercise in futility.

Kabashin:
Justice Okoro letter has set the zombies camp on fire.

After an all midnight brain storm on how to diffuse the fire, they came up with concocted trash devoid of all basic comprehension skill.

I can see a mother of zombie peeping, maybe she will add further to the stupidity of the thread

it is obvious you are the real zombie because that letter is useless before the law or can even send the two lordship to jail! I know you don't know that ;go to school jor.

DesChyko:
I like how you answered the other time. It made you coherent. Three posts were made highlighting three different issues. Quote the one(s) you answered thus. And if I'm not mistaken, you are suggesting what an evidence which would appease your expectations would look like. That is also noted.

I ignored the last two because I had answered them in an earlier post and don't want to waste time on them again because u ain't reading but only manoeuvring round the questions to suit your poor mindset! Okay maybe I should be blunt . That letter written to the CJN by okoro few hours ago is as useless and worthless than the paper on which it is written before any law court! the CJN should acknowledge the receipt of such verbal complaint from Okoro ,and shamefully let him tell us what steps he took to protect law and justice when he got the okoro notice ,and where is his evidence . The CJN should tell us then that he is an accomplice after crime and fact! lmao!

DesChyko:
Honestly, I was expecting you to give me something off your head. But no biggie. An alibi is simply an evidence that proves his innocence. And the best part of it is, he's got the CJN as a witness to that alibi. And you say a recorded call is not admissible evidence? In every case? I think not



It's nice you perceive parading evidence on media is gibberish. You were asking after evidence which would have better value in the law courts than on newspaper pages; thus my question. I can understand the antics of the EFCC/DSS of playing prosecutor on newspaper pages is getting to your sense of order.


Thank you for this piece of information. However, my question is 'How does the IPOB being soothed by his revelations help the case before him? You implied that this information is to appease the IPOB. Is he under trial before the IPOB or is he arrested by them? Explain please.

Holy Mary! even after giving you the dictionary and legal meaning of alibi ,you still goofed? So if a person says he reported an incidence he claimed happened in the past to anybody , not the police as the constitution dictates, is an alibi ? for the CJN is anybody not recognized here unless you can bring an official letter written by Okoro as at the time of the incidence to the office of CJN copying the police , SSS etc, and the reactions of these legally recognized bodies inform of prompt investigation eg tracing Amaechis's phone's GPS within the said hours which are not even evidence of an alleged bribery. So if Justice Okoro has such cases before him and one of the parties says he told a bicycle repairer instead of the police about a supposedly serious incident which has huge future legal implications, Justice Okoro will admit such ipobic claim as an evidence? Jeeeezus! I'm just wasting time with you.

DesChyko:
How do the IPOB being soothed come into the judge's claims, his case with the DSS, the CJN and the accused.
Pray tell.
Secondly, tell me of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law.
Finally, define an 'alibi' according to law. I await.

I'm answering your questions ascendingly.

1. First, I bring 2 definitions of alibi .
pronunciation
(America) (IPA): /ˈæl.ə.baɪ/
noun (plural alibis)
(legal) The plea or mode of defense under which a person on trial for a crime proves or attempts to prove that he was in another place when the alleged act was committed; as, to set up an alibi; to prove an alibi

The Criminal Law Deskbook (1988; ISBN 0820512176) states: "Alibi is different from all of the other defenses...it is based upon the premise that the defendant is truly innocent."

2. Second, I do not understand what you mean by " of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law" , or where I had referred to such gibberish in my post.

3. It is only an ipob , an unthinking hate filled degenerate, that would believe a legal authority ,an arbiter, with so many years of experience in the knowledge of the power of documented evidence as the key to truth when he talks like an uneducated tomato seller . no recorder , video, no recorded phone call a day after amaechi had left to play along in order to safe a rainy day as this? una no dey lie.

PentiumProf:
Like i said amechi is the most corrupt politician in nigeria
Amechi used the metro line project to embezzle rivers funds
Amechi spent over 17 billion rivers money on Buharis campaign
Amechi despite recieving over two trillion naira from both federation account and internally generated revenue between 2007 and 2015 could not execute any world class project
The money ended up in amechis pocket
Since you are amechis mouth piece advice him to refund rivers money
Buhari will not save him when he starts suffering

let me teach you how to do this :
1 . bring evidence of all the Fed allocation to Rivers and IGR under Amaechi, ministry of finance will give u free .
2 . bring all d budgets submitted n implemented which are documents of governments plan to spend states resources;
3 . then list d projects executed n not executed by Amaechi,; cost them including salaries ,bills and wages;
subtract 3 from 4 above and tell us how much is the difference and where is it . Even Wike with all his noise used to deceive you ipobs can't approach a competent law court to challenge Amaechi . anything short of this is all noise ; empty noise .

DesChyko:
What do you mean 'report immediately'?
Did he report at an unfit date?
He has a reliable alibi and that's all the law needs. Your retort on timing is off-target.

do you really know the meaning of the word 'alibi'? not even the learned CJN can come to the court without a documented evidence of that call Okoro claimed he made to him which is even not an admissible evidence in any lawcourt. He must proof beyond doubt that Amaechi tried to bribe him or he would be jailed. All we want is where did Okoro get the money caught with him at home? A judge should be able to answer such a simple question not muddling things up and spewing trash soothing to illiterate ipobs .

PentiumProf:
Rotimi amechi you are the most corrupt nigerian politician
You can decieve zombies including your boss buhari but not me or any reasonable person

if u ain't PentiumPro u can't be ; a poor version of the original Moniker. you can only get the F (fake, fail , fal....etc )added to that beautiful title. If you are sure of your statement about Amaechi bring your reasons and evidence and let us gist.

tuniski:
Amaechi will disappoint you ultimately. We all know they all are corrupt especially the executive which is the most corrupt!

what are your reasons? I don't deal in emotions or sentiments like ipobs. I ain't no hate filled one-way robots and if u ain't too Mr ,give me your reasons. I'm waiting.

tuniski:
Are u sure amaechi can really stand his ground. Even Dasuki will tell us certain damaging revelations about those in govt today!

why I would believe this judge who is trying to divert our attention from the bribery scandal hanging on his neck by mentioning Amaechi's name? it s simple : this is how I got the money in my account? Amaechi didn't need to bribe any judge for Rivers case was very clear. And the Ubima LionTiger just reinforced my believe in him by saying he is dragging the 'judge' to law court to explain better . no be today Wike n co have been shouting Amaechi this Amaechi that but lack d balls to prosecute him and you don't need any FG or his agencies to do that . instead of d f.....king judge telling us' I didn't collect bribe from any body, this is how I made my money' he is shouting Amaechi. Are u sure it isnt Wike n co that really bribed this stinking robe? Can't you see?

Amaechi please sue this liar ,and let us disrobe him .