₦airaland Forum

Why do you people suffer inferiority complex like this, anything any body says you people start reacting.

Iamgrey5:
Is three any press in Kogi to begin with?

But there's press for how underdeveloped, hungry the state is right?

Iamgrey5:
Is three any press in Kogi to begin with?

Group of Igbo girls were rescued in ghana, for example doing prostitution, the press didn't need to be in kogi

Very true,dstv / gotv doesn't show Nigerian matches, I dnt knw whats the strange reason for that,yet they show foreign matches .It's strange.

Despite all the bad press about kogi and how it's the most underdeveloped and poverty stricken state in Nigeria.

There is hardly cases of girls being trafficked enmass for prostitution, baby factory, ritual killings,skull mining,drug trafficking.

There are very low cases of bandit attacks or communal killings and uncontrollable violence.

Just few incidences of robberies and few violent crimes,low cases of rape etc.

The states that pride themselves as the most developed states,the richest states etc are filled with evil stories and poverty induced crimes.

Despite the neglect of the state by successive governments and not having individuals in strong positions in government,there seems to be something the PEOPLE of the state are doing quite right.

Even during the military years after Gowon all other leaders that have come through have always been lethargic and slow even with the relatively young military leaders.

Then with democracy Nigeria keeps voting in lethargic dull rulers like Obasanjo, yaradua ( sick),Jonathan (extremely docile ) ,buhari( dull,old,sick,lethargic, slow) and now TINUBU(old,lethargic).

Why can't NIGERIANS have vibrant strong and able leaders that are virile,forward thinking ,fast and brilliant.

Why do the major tribes especially the Hausa and Yoruba love these lethargic old rulers.

Many other countries have very vibrant young rulers,Nigeria needs such a ruler.

The major tribes who have all the voting power should be blamed for this.

The major tribes are a docile lethargic bunch.
The most enslaved people's in world history.

Dsimmer:
You're quite stupid. The North Africans simply acted like you and that was why they were wiped out. They acted stupidly by replacing their superior culture with the backward retrogressive foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over foreign Arab allah stone hence the reason why they were wiped out by the criminal Arabs. Simple as ABC.

My main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill the indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

You are a dull man,u are not an African,easy to tell by the way u talk,u don't know anything about Africa

It's like the Nigerian government is just there to appropriate funds for their personal use and pay some people working for them salaries.

I don't see their relevance and importance.

The NIGERIAN government is for itself and it's cronies.

There is no relevance to the people.

They can't protect the people
They can't secure wealth and well being for the people.

They are just there for people to talk about them and praise or castigate them.

They don't do much,yet they are so high handed and arrogant.

There simply is no relevance of the Nigerian government.

The hausa-fulani and Yoruba brought in successive evil governments.

Buhari was not just a bad leader,he was evil

Make no mistake the major tribes of Nigeria, the Hausa,Yoruba and Igbo lack sense of high organisation.Their societies are a mess,even the living conditions in majority states are bizarre.

They have never been organised in history, having been the most enslaved people in human history.

Nigeria needs to be led by minority tribes.

The okun were terribly enslaved by the Nupe

Plateau people and Benue people literally handed over the land to them

The major tribes of NIG should take charge of their states and stop allowing minority Fulani constitution control them

The nomadism of the Fulani and their free forest dwelling lifestyle needs to be called to question.

The Fulani hàve done enough damage already

Can Nigerians be seen moving carelessly through out bush paths,villages and forest in say Senegal for example without them being queried,searched ,rounded up and possibly deported back to NIG.

Why are Fulani's in the name of being nomadic allowed free movement in Nigeria without question.

Why are the governments of the major tribes particularly allowing all these in their various states.

The LAGOS govt for example will rather deport fellow Yoruba people to their states,or Igbo people to their states but will never touch the Hausa illegal occupants in various illegal spots at every corner of the state.

Various openly foreign Nigerien Fulani are seen all over Nigeria, moving about freely untouched.

The freedom allowed the Fulani needs to be scrutinised, there is a conspiracy against indigenous land owners in Nigeria

Dsimmer:
It seems you're stupid though. Zanzibar revolution is about Tanzanian who sent out the criminal Arabs who were enslaving and murdering them in their own territory. It's Tanzanians who were the victims to begin with.

You are irritating, the typical irritating African,my point is if Zanzibar revolution could occur,why do you think your so called north Africans could not send out the Arabs who you say were murdering them and enslaving them.

There was nothing like Arabs enslaving Africans, they simply purchased SLAVES.

You don't even realise that there were also many blacks from Senegal particularly who were hired mercenaries working for the Arab armies that invaded Spain.

There were many blacks among those ranks.

Arabs only acquired slaves they cudnt enslave Africans ,infact they were only able to enslave whites.

Arab perception of blacks was good up until they started purchasing black slaves from irritating Africans who sold their neighbours to SLAVERY

Dsimmer:
Another gibberish.

Africans exist today both in their African homeland and even in Europe despite the colonization by the Europeans whereas same can't be said for the North Africans who were wiped out by the criminal wicked Arabs.

As a matter of fact, the Arabs captured both Africans and the Europeans. The Arabs enslaved, castrated and murdered them. That was Until the Europeans fought back and dealt with the useless criminal Arabs thus stopping the madness of the criminal Arabs.

Arabs were also enslaved and murdered by other people,including Africans,read about the Zanzibar revolution

Dsimmer:
No, You're the one projecting the criminal Arab as your god. Something which the stupid Egyptians did until they were wiped out.

Meanwhile, I haven't exonerated the Europeans for what they did to Africa. However I acknowledged the fact that they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs. Heck, the Europeans could have wiped out all the Arabs after they fought back and defeated the Arabs during the crusades yet they didn't wipe out all the Arabs and even allowed the Arabs to stay in Saudi.

The Arabs had minimal war against africans and only bought slaves,infact Arabs captured more of white SLAVES.

But white slavery is hardly talked about, everyone including Africans like you keep emphasising black slavery, that project blacks as dumb and weak.

Dsimmer:
The Europeans didn't wipe out Africans and others from their ancestral home because they weren't as wicked as the criminal Arabs! Simple as ABC. Heck, the Europeans were the ones who stopped slavery.

As for those Africans who got wiped out by the criminal Arabs were those who refused to use the intelligence in their Ori thus replaced their superior culture with the backward unintelligent foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over the foreign Arab allah stone worshipping until Arabs finished them all in the end.

It's a lie,Europeans are gods to you,
Europeans were simply not capable of wiping out Africans if they could they would have,this is evident by the fact that werever they could they did,like in the Americas against the red Indians,like against the Herero,like against the black aborigines of australia and new zealand,etc,werever they found they were capable of wiping out the population they did.

The French would have wiped out the Haitians during the revolution if the could but they cudnt.

Arabs have not had war against Africans except the almoravids invasion of Mali

Again neither Europeans nor Arabs cud or can wipe out africans

Dsimmer:
You mean like how the criminal Mohammed said he flew by moon into Jerusalem? Lol.

Mohammad went to no Ethiopia apart from the middle east he was constantly plundering with his criminality. It was after his death that his fellow criminal Arabs continued his criminal footsteps and then went further into Egypt, the other North Africa and even Europe until they were dealt with by the Europeans. That of course stopped their madness. It was also the Europeans who stopped slavery even though the Arabs hadn't wanted to stop.

And yes, the European colonized Africa. However they weren't as callous as the Arabs. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by some outsiders irrespective of the enslavement of Africans by the European is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

And yes, the Egyptians were blacks. That's already ascertained by their arts and the ancient Greeks such as Aristotle, Plato etc who affirmed the Egyptians were blacks!

Europeans could not wipe anyone out,they only fought to wear their opponents down and gain control, many tribes especially in Nigeria were already bogged down by internal wars when the Europeans came in,that is what gave the Europeans victory, cos Nigerian tribes were already war weary so didn't fight much with the Europeans when they came in.

Nigerian tribes easily submitted and were left to be,if the Europeans had gone ahead to attempt any massacres,they would have been severely resisted and defeated.

You talk about the magniminity of Europeans but forget,the Herero in Namibia who were massacred by the Germans, are Germans not Europeans again? They saw the herero as easy pickings that's why they attempted the massacres and remain in Namibia today,the Rhodesian Afrikaans ( Dutch) also did that in Zimbabwe but we're later booted out,Angola fought a bitter war of independence with Portugal,same as Guinea, the king Leopold of Belgium massacred and amputated Congolese,these were easy pickings for the Europeans and they showed their stuff,they cudnt do such in West Africa and south Africa( the country) because those areas were occupied by WAR experienced tribes.

Again Arabs could never have wiped out Africans, they are simply not capable of doing so,why did the so called Sudanese Arabs not wipe out the south Sudanese,the black south Sudanese gave them the hell they were seeking,just as the antibalaka of the CAR gave the Arab Fulani wannabe the beating of their lives.

Again you are completely wrong and misled.

Arabs never wiped out Africans and Europeans only bought slaves and did not enslave Africans

Quintessence44:
Same way the Hausas are asking ''What if the Igbos were never christianized? They would have had more sense!''

Or you think say na only una sabi ask question?

Igbo Christianity started only with colonialism, the Fulani jihad and rule of Hausa states,led to the eventual capture of Ilorin and Nupe,which led to the wars targeted at kogi my home region,which attracted the British leading to eventual colonialism and formation of Nigeria

What if the Fulani jihad failed and the Fulani were wiped out from Hausa land and the status quo continued were the political Islam was never pedestaled(uplifted) like it is in hausaland today.

Could the Hausa have been better off and in extension Nigeria?

The Fulani jihad had a devastating overflow effect to the middlebelt and south that plunged the entire todays Nigerian area in constant wars. This weakened the composite ethnic nations and made them easy picking for the British.

Maybe Many today's Nigerian regional tribes would have fought off British colonialist and prevented their entry,we might have never had a Nigeria but many smaller ethnic nations maybe which would have been better off.

The Fulani were and remain a severe plug in the wheel of progress of the constituent todays NIGERIAN tribes.

Dsimmer:
Nah. Most of the Europeans went back to their territory. Of course some Europeans were obnoxious but they weren't as callous as the Arabs.

I will use Nigeria as case study. The fact that the Northern Nigeria exist while practicing the foreign Islam forced on them by outsiders despite the European enslavement of Africans is a testament to the magnanimous act of the Europeans unlike the Arabs who would have wiped them out, let alone let them continue with a religion different from theirs 🤔.. Even the Northern Africans who were practicing the backward Arab religion/culture were still wiped out by the criminal Arabs 🙄

As a matter of fact, after the Europeans fought back against the Arabs and defeated the Arabs, they were still the one who allowed Arabs to settle in Saudi. If it was the callous Arabs in their shoe, that wouldn't have been the case.

That's my answer!

Anyways, my main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over a religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Europeans didn't enslave Africans, they simply bought slaves from other Africans,there was never enslavement on African soil,

One thing people do not get is that the fact there was heavy available number of slaves to be bought is evidence that Africans were a notorious warring people and not that they were sitting weaklings.

You people have this misconception of Africans as a kumbaya happy naive people, that's a terrible misconception, Africans were a constantly fighting race,more than the Europeans or Arabs.

I repeat, neither the Europeans or Arabs could wipe out Africans, nor did they enslave Africans.

Northern Africa was never black lands, it was berberlands,who are largely related to the arabs,if it was,it was the desertification of the Sahara that killed off the blacks in northern Africa not the Arabs

More so,why did they not wipe out the Ethiopians etc who records shows were present during the time of Mohammed and even accommodated Mohammed at a time,why could they not even as much Islamise the Ethiopians if Arabs were that strong or is it Europeans that saved them too, are they not blacks too or its only negroid blacks that lack war ability to you or are sacrificial lambs for you right?

Mystic216:
Kogi state 😂😂

Very funny state in Nigeria 😂

I always view the state as one typical village 😂😂

Una just dey talk,you'll be surprised in reality kogi is better than your state

The tyranny of the old elite,these major tribes keep voting in

Dsimmer:
Nah. The ethnicity in the North Africa is Arabs. As a matter of fact, the Europeans
who were there were also murdered and castrated as well as the Blacks. The Arabs had even gone further to Spanish territory to continue their madness until the Europeans fought back and dealt with them.

As I stated already, we all knew how the Europeans operated. They came to Africa but returned back to their territory. If they were as callous as the Arabs, Africans wouldn't even exist to begin with. Of course this isn't exonerating the Europeans for enslaving Africans however they were the ones who also stopped slavery whereas the Arabs hadn't wanted to stop

It's a lie,read the history of Zulus in south Africa,if not for the fighting ability of the Zulus,they would have been wiped out,the Europeans cud not prevail over Africans,Africans were not some sitting ducks that cud just be wiped out like that even with advanced weapons the Europeans suffered heavy casualties that's why they had to concede truce in many instances,if they had their way,they wud have wiped out Africans,Africans are better fighters than Europeans or Arabs,they just lacked advanced weapons like the red Indians who were poor fighters and were wiped out by Europeans.

Even in West Africa, Europeans suffered heavy casualties in many places and most of their wars were fought by blacks themselves, in Nigeria the Hausa fought for the British against other tribes

Read about Zanzibar revolution, Arabs can never wipe out Africans, Arabs had access to better weapons which made them have some gains in the world but it wasn't adequate enough to do much damage.

Again you are wrong and delusional.

Arabs or Europeans can never wipe out Africans even today with all their advanced equipments.

Iamanoited:
SECONDED.

Nigerians only need to adequately defend their territories against Fulani invaders,if every tribe plays it's part,the Fulani will limit their disaster to their Hausa subjects

Quintessence44:
India is the world poverty capital, and regained her position in 2022.

Get your facts straight, you IPOB outcast.

The most high will judge those of you creating enemity in Nigeria.

Buhari single handedly created the various insecurities in the country with his abysmal leadership , management skills and tyranny.

Buhari remains the worst thing to happen to Nigeria.

He was a terrible mistake.

critique99:
The bastard Sultan of Sokoto.., your ancestors came from Futa Djallon in present day Guinea, to establish a fake caliphate in Hausa Land.

The Hausa are not complaining, they love their Fulani brothers