₦airaland Forum

Obrigardo:
bro, seriously, you need to go for psych evaluation. I mean this from the bottom of my heart.

Am I lying or CNN has not reported this, hence didn't happen.
Search for this case.
CURLING v. RAFFENSPERGER

Ijebos, Another Harvard top dog, the Head of DEI is also an accomplished copy cat plagiarist.
These black entitled DEI hires deserve a class action suit for the damage they are doing to Harvard.
Who will employ a Harvard graduate now? Esp one with a degree on " How Trump's border wall affects yellow butterflies breeding grounds".

Konkoja:
No, I don't hear nonsense. In 2021, I posted a link specifically for you to claim money when you can proof electoral fraud.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ_S72WLGBs

Present your evidence of fraud and make money, you clown.

Konkoja, there is an ongoing case in Georgia court system about whether Georgia should use Dominican voting systems.
An expert two Fridays ago hacked their machine in the presence of a judge, and changed votes. The media has been silent about this. He demonstrated how he could erase access logs and how a thumbstick can install malware on the cursed system that cost Fox news $750m .

IjeBos:
You should probably google the legal doctrine "collateral estoppel". It would save you bucketloads of data wrting these posts and prevent you from sounding more like a nut. The judge's hands were more or less tied by the law.


https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-testify-e-jean-carroll-trial-testimony-disaster-2024-1

You should know that the law is an ass..I'm.a Smart Ass, a dull person might find it difficult to understand what I wrote. All over the world, tyrants use the law to achieve their ends without falling foul of the law. Biden is on such tyrant who has convinced you that his opponents are dangerous domestic terrorists Critics of his have been jailed, bankrupted, silenced and cancelled .

Under that legal doctrine, does it apply if there is an appeal filed at a higher court.
People convicted of murder have been acquitted by higher courts. Would they be sued from saying they did not kill?
Get a life man.When it comes to Trump he should accept he is a rapist until a higher court acquits him.

JessicaRabbit:
Of course you're entitled to your opinion, just like I'm entitled to pity you for clinging to one that's demonstrably false. Your claims that Carroll and Trump never met is contradicted by the evidence and by Trump's own words. This recent comment of yours is just sour grapes because you've lost the debate. The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, was a Clinton appointee who's known for being fair and unbiased. He ran the trial like a pro, and followed the book. He didn't block any defense, but he did say that Trump gave up his presidential shield by blabbing about the case. Questions to the plaintiff weren't ignored, he only upheld objections that made sense. The jury was do their job based on the facts and the law, so the verdict wasn't rigged. Saying that justice is a lost cause for conservatives in America, is a false and divisive narrative. Justice doesn't care about your red or blue hats, it cares about the truth. The jury that fined Trump with a hefty sum was made up of regular folks who got picked out of a hat. They didn't let their politics cloud their judgment, they let the evidence and the law guide them. They heard both sides of the story, checked the facts, and agreed on the outcome without any fuss.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for alternative facts in a game of charades, but when it comes to real issues, reality is the only costume you can wear. Conspiracy theories are like ripped tights – they'll only leave you exposed.

I suggest that you move on from this topic. You must have better things to do with your precious time and brain cells than to waste them on a washed-up ex-president who couldn't keep his pants zipped.

Don't think I've not noticed your lies.
The judge was biased. You know nothing about the jury selected.
Reid Hoffman is paying her bills She admitted that in court.
Justice was not served rightfully.
There are women who claimed Clinton raped them, I think one settled out of court, the rest sit by and watch him escape all sort of scrutiny.
You lied about Monica Lewinsky blue dress. She was not a victim of Bill Clinton perse. She was a victim of Hillary who labelled her and others as " bimbo eruptions" and orchestrated a scheme to damage her reputation. I watched her Ted Talk don't assume I'm just writing or believing anything you've written
Tara Reid has a written complaint against Joe Biden. Those documents are sealed by Joe Biden Archivist, She can't prove it.
Justice is served to to those suing republican.
Giuliani was not able to produce evidence because FBI raid took away every electronics he had. The judge partly used that against him the declare him liable for defamation l.

You spew a lot of lies about Jean Carroll being traumatized.
Remember when Blaise Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault. She later recanted. Democrat style. Image below because you will say it's lies.They lie to serve a particular putpose. I believe this is another scheme by Jean Carroll.
I'm.not known to give up on topics I believe I'm right, for the upteempth time I use this as my bookmarks for later reference.
To be honest I don't believe a thing you wrote about this topic. You sound like her lawyer. Intending to convince us that there is equal justice.Yiu are peddoing a narrative, it's very easy to pick your talking points and find them repeated by leftie media.
Before I forget, did she ever see a shrink or a counsellor about her traumatic rape in a very busy fashion shop? Did she, or maybe dyeing her dog pink was therauptic?
I think there was some witness who can swear there was no rape allegations in that store while she worked there during that period . I'll find out why she did not testify.
Finally Jean Carroll got her description of the store wrong too if I'm correct.

Because the darn encounter happened in her dreams.

Obrigardo:
Finally learned this was a subpoena for a house democrat involved in something shady.

Thought it was only Republicans who.
commit fraud

I kept an eye on this. It's Cory Bush. The black antisemitic congresswoman.
She will cry racism I'm rather sure . Or blame Joo Media.

JessicaRabbit:
I admire your commitment to creative thinking, even if it means bending the laws of logic like a pretzel. Let's see if we can straighten things out together.

1. My inner spell-check is having a seizure trying to keep up with your post. Maybe you should proofread your posts before you hit send. It doesn't help your credibility when you can't even spell "please" or "cabin" correctly.

2. You're still spewing baseless claims like a broken faucet. The judge was fair, Carroll was honest, the jury was impartial, and Reid Hoffman has nothing to do with this. These are all facts that have been verified by reliable sources. Do your research.

3. The jury slapped Trump with a guilty verdict for molesting and slandering Carroll, based on the words of Carroll, her buddies, and other people who saw it, as well as the DNA proof on the dress she had on when he attacked her. The jury also gave her $83 million in compensation, which is a big win for victims of sexual abuse and a loud wake-up call to Trump that he can't get away with anything.

4. You're showing a complete lack of empathy and/or sensitivity to Carroll and other survivors of sexual violence. You're making fun of her trauma, her lifestyle, her pets, and her book, which is a brave and inspiring story of her struggles and her quest for justice. You're also suggesting that she had some crush or lust for Trump, which is ridiculous and offensive. She was a accomplished and esteemed writer and journalist, who had no motive to fabricate being violated by a rich and influential man.

5. You keep projecting your own biases and prejudice onto the situation. You are thinking that Carroll and her supporters are "Trump haters" who are driven by politics, instead of by the facts and the law. You are also brushing off the decision of the jury, which was made up of regular folks who were picked randomly and fairly, suggesting that they were somehow swayed by their political leanings, rather than by the proof and the guidance of the judge. You are also turning a blind eye to the fact that Trump has been accused of sexual misbehavior by more than two dozen women, many of whom have sued him.

Hopefully, you will come to your senses and apologize to Carroll and other survivors of sexual violence by retracting your baseless accusations. They deserve your respect and your support, not your mockery and your lies. And I hope you will also enlighten yourself and learn more about the problems and the truths of sexual harassment and assault, and how they impact millions of people around the world. Maybe then you will realize why this case is so crucial and why we need to say "enough is enough" to sexual predators like Trump!

I hear you. It seems you are fully in tune with tie feelings of a sexual assault victim.You also fully trust the judgeand jury. Well that's your right.
I don't believe she ever met him. Having a photo means nothing, I've met so many people in life whose faces nor names I cannot recall.
I dont believe the judge an jury are fair. The judge use the law to prevent any defence. Trump has already appealed the first ruling, the judge denying him defence based on the first trial, also threatening to jail Trump's lawyer, overuling questions to the plaintiff smacks of a predetermined outcome. He had said the jury would deliberate in a very short time ( 3 hours? ).
I no longer believe there is any justice esp to conservatives in America.

I'm not done with this topic.

JessicaRabbit:
I wouldn't say I "don't get it at all". More like I'm choosing not to get lost in the labyrinth you've built.



This is just you engaging in victim blaming by implying that Carroll's memory of the year is relevant to the validity of her claim. Many survivors of sexual assault experience trauma-related memory loss. It doesn't mean they are lying or confused.



You are making a false analogy here by comparing Carroll to Monica Lewinsky, who had a consensual affair with Bill Clinton. Carroll did not keep the dress as evidence, but as a reminder of her strength and resilience. She also wore the dress publicly several times, unlike Lewinsky.



Calling something a "Law and Order plot" is about as specific as blaming the weather on "the sky stuff." There is no evidence that Carroll ever watched that show, and the episode in question aired in 2012, not 2016 as you claim. Your conspiracy theory has no meat. Maybe your tinfoil hat is picking up extra signals?



Carroll's Twitter messages vanished? Fake news, faker than a toupee made of spun sugar. Her tweets are as present as a stubborn houseguest overstaying their welcome. Carroll did not delete her Twitter messages, but only made them private after receiving death threats and harassment from Trump supporters. Her lawsuit was not funded by Reid Hoffman, but by a nonprofit organization that provides legal support to survivors of sexual violence. Hoffman's donation was made before Carroll filed her suit and he had no prior knowledge that his funding would go to support her in particular. Your statements are about as accurate as a blindfolded archer. Let's stick to what we actually know.



Another classic example of endorsing rape myths and perpetuating a culture of disbelief and stigma towards survivors. The fact that Carroll has experienced multiple instances of sexual violence does not make her less trustworthy or less deserving of justice. On the contrary, it shows the prevalence and severity of the problem of sexual violence in our society.



At this point, I'm not surprised that you would blatantly ignore the psychological and social barriers that many survivors of sexual assault face. According to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN), only 23% of sexual assaults are reported to the police, and the reasons for not reporting include fear of retaliation, shame, self-blame, distrust of the legal system, and lack of support. Carroll herself said that she did not report the assault because she blamed herself and felt that no one would believe her. She also said that she was inspired by the #MeToo movement and other women who came forward with their stories of abuse by Trump.



Your claim is a wild shot in the dark. In fact, it is as baseless as Trump's hairpiece. Carroll is a famous writer and media star who knows a lot of big shots. But none of them had anything to do with her suing Trump or paying her lawyer. She is footing the bill herself and she doesn't want a dime from Trump. She also doesn't give a hoot about his presidency or his politics. She just wants him to admit that he did her wrong and clear her name.



You're asking a loaded question that suggests the jury was clueless or blind. That's not the case. The jury listened to Carroll, her two buddies who backed her up, two other ladies who had similar stories about Trump, and Trump himself. The jury also got to see a picture of Carroll and Trump looking cozy in 1987, the Access Hollywood tape where Trump boasted about his groping skills, and the dress that Carroll wore when it happened. The jury compared all the evidence and decided that Carroll was telling the truth and Trump was lying. The jury also agreed that Trump insulted Carroll by saying she was a loser, and not his cup of tea. The jury's verdict was based on the most convincing evidence, which is how it works in civil cases.



Trump got slapped with a $5 million bill for being a sexual predator and a liar in the first trial. He got slapped again with a whopping $83.3 million bill for being a liar in the second trial. The judge in the first trial made it clear that Trump had done the deed that rhymes with "grape". The jury in the second trial didn't have to waste time on that, since it was already a done deal. So, yeah, Trump is a certified rapist, and the judge was right to say so.

Plus, The judge in the first trial, Lewis Kaplan, was not a senior managing partner where Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, worked. He was a partner at a different law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. There is no evidence that he was her mentor, or that he had any conflict of interest in presiding over the case. He was randomly assigned to the case by the court's computer system.



New York Times didn't unearth the dress that Carroll was wearing when she was attacked. She did, after hoarding it in her wardrobe for ages. The dress was a Donna Karan creation from 1993, and she bought it from Bergdorf Goodman, the very place where the assault took place. The dress had some DNA traces on it, which Carroll was willing to examine, but Trump chickened out of giving a sample. The dress was a badge of Carroll's bravery and resistance, as she rocked it again for the cover of her book, What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal.



Carroll wasn't penning a column on anal sex, but on sex and relationships in general, for Elle magazine. She didn't keep mum about her assault, but confided in two of her pals right after it happened, who both backed her up in court. She also spilled the beans in her book, which came out in 2019, before she bumped into George Conway at a shindig thrown by Kathy Griffin. Conway, a big-shot conservative lawyer and Trump basher, urged Carroll to drag Trump to court for defamation after he brushed off the assault. Reid Hoffman, the bigwig behind LinkedIn, isn't footing the bill for Carroll's lawyer, but has chipped in to the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, which helps victims of sexual harassment and assault.



Pointless assertion. Kathy Griffin is not relevant to the case, nor is her infamous photo of holding a fake severed head of Trump, which she apologized for. Carroll is friends with Griffin, but that does not affect her credibility or her right to seek justice.

You are using sexism, honor, and fragile masculinity to rationalize your support for Trump and your baseless dismissal of Carroll, ignoring the evidence and the arguments presented by Carroll and her lawyer, and focusing on irrelevant or false details to discredit her. You have successfully built a fortress of denial around yourself, complete with a moat of excuses and drawbridge of deflection.

I'll also have you know that you are sliding down a very slippery slope by feeding into rape culture, which normalizes and excuses sexual aggression, and protects rapists from accountability. Please, do better.

I trust my instincts. The judge was a senior partner at the same lawfirm she was a shining star, working smart to okease her bosses.
The script in law and irde was in 2012. 2019-7 = 2012.
She is a victim of rape, so her cat is called vagina, her dog is Tits, she lives in s dabin where the trees she paintef blue, she dyed her dog pink, she met Trump and within minutes he is offering to buy her lingerie. They go to the dressing room where she is fingered and penetrated. The jury finds she was not penetrated. Juries in a place that voted Biden by over 3/4 right if I'm .right..
I think she wanted to write a love story with Donald trump relative.
More will be coming out. I'll revisit this

Trust me Noone has ever proven me wrong here. You will be the first.
Her buddies are Trump haters.
According to nationalpulse and other media, Reid Hoffman is paying her lawyers.

Obrigardo:
You know the Colorado Supreme court already kicked the criminal off the ballot. Now all eyes are on SCOTUS to see if they are going to go rogue. Clearance thomas hasn't recused himself yet. And It will be interesting to see how Gorsuch rules considering the Colorado court used his benchmark ruling as the context for removing criminal trump.
My prediction is that Scotus will uphold Colorado in a 6-3 or 5-4 decision i.e if clearance won't recuse himself. The justices who will dissent must provide clear explanation as to why they think 14.3 doesn't apply to criminal trump, considering over 700 people have been sent to jail by participating in this Insurrection.
The same decision will come down with the Immunity case.

Criminal trump will lose all round.

Who has any insurrection indictment?
Zero.
Case closed.

JessicaRabbit:
You seem to think I'm some die-hard Carroll fanatic, clinging to her every word. LOL. Relax, I'm simply admiring the flaws in your analysis. You see, it's all well and good to wave your dismissive paw, but where's the engagement with the actual evidence and arguments she presents? Don't tell me you're afraid to tumble down the rabbit hole of logic, are you? I see you still insist on playing the 'mentally sick woman' card. How cliché of you. And the article that you linked to is chock full of logical fallacies, ad hominem attacks, and unsubstantiated claims.

By the way, E. Jean isn't some random internet nobody. She's a published author and veteran Elle columnist with a 26-year track record. But hey, facts are the enemy of a good witch hunt, right? And let's not forget, she's just one of over 20 women who accused Trump of similar behavior. But sure, let's focus on her tweets because...reasons? And speaking of tweets, Carroll did not admit to deleting her tweets, but to archiving them. She explained that she did so to protect her privacy and safety, as some of the tweets contained personal information or abusive messages. But before you erupt with "censorship!" cries, consider this: those tweets are still lurking, like digital ghosts, ready to be summoned as evidence if need be. Furthermore, she claimed that Trump damaged her reputation and career by calling her a liar and implying that she was too unattractive to rape. The death threats she received on Twitter were a consequence of Trump's defamatory statements, not a motive for her lawsuit.

Oh, and while you're busy dissecting Carroll's fashion sense, you're missing the bigger picture. The dress isn't a museum exhibit, it's a symbol of courage, worn proudly like a warrior's armor. She didn't don it to impress Vogue editors in 2019, but to stare down her accuser and the world. Now, about that 1994 label mix-up? Let's not get hung up on fashion faux pas when we're talking about something far more profound. It's like nitpicking the wallpaper in a burning building. Focus on the flames, big guy, not the decor.

Thus far, all you've continued to do is make a barrage of accusations, while employing common tactics used to discredit and silence survivors of sexual assault, and it reflects the rape myths that pervade our culture. One of the rape myths that you seem to endorse is that rape is caused by the perpetrator's uncontrollable sexual urge, and that women who dress or act provocatively are inviting or deserving of rape. This is what Carroll was challenging when she said that rape is not sexy, but a violent crime. She was not implying that she enjoyed being raped, as you suggest, but that she was trying to cope with the trauma and stigma of being a survivor. She was also exposing the hypocrisy and double standards that exist in our society, where women are expected to be sexually attractive, but not sexually assertive. Your replies so far read more like clear attempts to discredit and silence Carroll, who is one of the many women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct.

You don't get it at all. This woman can't remember the year she was raped, She still keeps the dress and never wore it or washed it all those years. Kinda roleplaying Linda Tripp who adviced Monica Lewinsky to preserve the blue dress that had Bill Clinton's semen. Carroll never produced that dress for forensics.
As for the Law n Order series where someone was violated in the same store's dressing room, Ste comes out with same script 7 years after it aired, mind you twas another program she used to watch.She said she joked about him dressing up in the lingerie Trump apparently went in to buy her.

Deleting her Twitter messages. You are insincere that she got death threats after Trump said she was a liar and not his type. Let her produce her full texts, You can't prove that she did not get the threats after excerpts of her book became public and before Trump responded. Because she deleted her darn texts!!!
Note she held at least 4 TV interviews after seeing her book was not selling enough.

I could talk on her behalf that she deserves to be heard but the coincidences are not weighing in her favor.
She has accused several others of sexually violating her.. I'll get the exact number but it's more than 5.

Carroll has claimed to have been assaulted by numerous men other than Donald Trump, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves. Her lawsuit against Trump was funded by Democrat billionaire Reid Hoffman.

She used to watch the apprentice by her words that features Trump, the show with him ran for 14 seasons from 2004. He reportedly made $215m from it. Jean Carroll would have come out then and destroyed him, She never did.
She was happy to watch a show that made her violator world famous and rich.Sell me a bridge.
Kathy Griffin. George Conway. Reid Hoffman, Epstein the paedophile's good friend.
( If Trump wins Epstein children fucker's buddies will be called to account I hope). The three sworn Trump haters Add New York State, that extended the statute of limitations for sexual harrassment by a year, enabling her to sue Trump hours after it was passed. Coincidental?

You seem to know more. Tell me how would a jury find Trump Not guilty of rape but of sexual violation without forensics.
Why would the judge call him a convicted rapist while he wasn't found guilty of that? The judge was a senior managing partner where her lawyer worked, he definitely knew the shining star of his former lawfirm, It's defence position that he was her mentor.

As for the dress, it was NYT who discovered that the dress she claimed to wear then had not been designed then.So traumatic was the incidence She was writing a column about anal sex and not about " Me too" over the years.
Jean Carroll was attending a Kathy Griffin bash when she met George Conway, never Trumper founder of Lincoln project, who convinced her to sue. Reid Hoffman is paying her lawyer.
Kathy Griffin most infamous photo below. Jean Carroll friend.

IjeBos:
Mr. Self hater. It doesn't matter. That trial is done. Get it through you head. He lost that trial. Whether he defended himself, whether she was lying has no bearing on this defamation case as the Judge had to continuously remind Trump's lawyer. A smart person could have professed his innocence without defaming her. He chose to defame her being the idiot he is and got sued again. And he will continue to get sued over and over again because he can't control his mouth. He's used to bullying people who can't afford lawyers as most of the right are.

Something is wrong with you that you spend all this time defending this person in the most stupidest of ways.

You moral high ground. Jean Carroll lawyer Roberta Kaplan was a junior associate at a lawfirm where the judge was a senior partner. OK it lasted two years , I do know managing partners are always involved in recruitment of and performance of legal staff, the two obviously wirked as a team then, and in this trial too.An obvious conflict of interest that should have been declared before the names trial.
It's obvious now how judges and prosecutors interpret the law to fita crime that will rope in Trump and zco.
Alvin Bragg , twisted a law upgrading a misdemeanor to a felony, . Jackboot reinterprets the laws too, Fanni Willis uses expanded Georgia RICO to indict Trump $ Co. Some Jan 6 cases grounds have a hearing on their validity at SCOTUS currently.
This judge uses the previous trial to block any defence from Trump.
If stinks to high heavens.Engoron also determined the case without trial.
Thing there is a saying for those who can't snell the stink

IjeBos:
A fuq boi. That's usually reserved to guys like you, who have 4 kids out of wedlock, they don't have custody of (those are truths you posted here). You are like Trump, too stupid to shut your mouth when it doesn't benefit you. Who are you to be talking about idealistic family lives/values? You're trash. You are the picture of who black parents tell their kids not to be.

You keep writing these posts, speaking of an imaginary person. I'll never understand why you get up in the morning to waste your time with these lies (when you have those 4 kids to make money for). Does the image of me you make up comfort you? I went to Boston Latin (an exam school, you can google the entrance requirements), then Harvard (you can google those as well). All my entrance requirements were greater than 98th percentile (grades, admission tests). And since you don't understand that that means; I was better that 98% of the people taking those tests/grades.

Your insecurity about not living in the US makes you think that I think I'm better than people because I live in the US. If I got myself UK citizenship, you make have a point. But, it's your insecurity. Just like your insecurity about being Dumb, makes you think every black person is as equally dumb as you and can't compete.

People are here having real discussions about real things while writing complete sentences. You come on here, make shit up, bang on the keyboard and scream DEI. You're a buffon through and through.

You can come here flaunt wealth and we can never prove whether it's true or not
How do you know Bemeruca is not in the USA?How do you know I've never seen the inside of a plane? ( I've flown whole seated on a jump seat in the cockpit of a Fokker-72 and a DC-9 with the pilots on at least 3 occasions, so I know more about flying than the average person. I was carrying data access equipment not the internet).
As for schools you attended, we cannot prove. What we can prove is by what you post, how petty you are, how shallow your reasoning is. Making us doubt whether you ever saw a classroom door in the first place. There is nothing of substance you have ever posted. No post of yours can reveal your proffession or expertise on any subject matter under the sun. Nothing you have ever posted indicates you went to school.in short your responses betray you in ways you don't and can't comprehend.

Konkoja:
No, I don't hear nonsense. In 2021, I posted a link specifically for you to claim money when you can proof electoral fraud.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ_S72WLGBs

Present your evidence of fraud and make money, you clown.

Oh okay. It happened last Friday in Georgia. I'll revisit this matter later, for now just remember that Dominion voting machines have been shown to be easy to hack AF.. In a courtroom of all other places. They won't be used in 2024 in Georgia .
They said with covax you would not get the Rona and you believed them.
They also say you only need surgery and some injections to become a woman, and you believe them.
They also say voterID is racist.you believe them.

IjeBos:
This was a defamation case. The original case is done and dusted. Trump could have, should have brought up his defenses at the original tri
al. Or asked basilico to defend him. But the moment that case was settled, Trump continuously saying she was lying, became defamation as the court/law had sided with her. So, no, this was not a trial to relitigate whether she was raped/secually assualted. The judge treated that as fact as that is what the previous trial adjudicated. This was simply to decide if Trump defamed her based on the previous adjudication and what the damages would be. And during the trial, Trump being the paragon of control and intelligence he is, defamed her some more, looking for jury nullification.

And here lies the problem. A wealthy smart person could find an attorney to write a statement declaring his innocence without defaming her and then losing a defamation trial. A wealthy smart person could have found a better attorney and kept himself/herself composed during this trial and not angered the judge and jury. But trump turned a 5million loss (the original trial) into a ~100 million loss(pending appeal) because he just couldn't keep his mouth shut. And this is the person a large swath of the US wants to run the presidency? Wants to be in control of nuclear arsenal? And wants to handle sensitive negotiations with other world powers and adversaries? Lol

Sometimes you make sense upto some point. Trump didn't defend himself in the first sham case. Why bother when everyone can see a cat called vagina owner was lying.I also didn't think that anyone with two brain cells would buy her story.
How would a jury determine that there was no rape, but Trump sexually violated her? She claimed Trump dipped his fingers, pulled out his dick and penetrated her. Explain that. How does a jury determine no sex, but there was a finger involved?
Because he was caught lambasting A-list types as being so cheap they would allow a big star to grab them by the pussy?

Konkoja:
Trump (in words and actions) ultimately believes he is above the law. Hence, why he thinks he will get away with anything.

He believes he should not be subject to same standards as others. See how he didn't bother about GOP debates. They didn't see anything wrong with it, he is their god.

Establishe

d processes and procedures are not for him. That's why he will undermine any process and procedure that he can't alter to suit him. No wonder, he continued to undermine electoral process because he lost.

Trump has successfully projected all the above to his followers. Hence, you see a rookie lawyer like Alina Habba talking about judges, judiciary without any professional decorum. After all these nonsense, she is toast as a lawyer.

Have you heard that Georgia voting machine was hacked in a trial by a plaintiff witness, changed the votes and deleted all action logs he took on the machine? All using a ball point pen.

See a shrink.

budaatum:
I don't understand why you and your Reddit user are trying this case in the court of buda when you could have gotten paid by dump to present your "homework" before Judge Kaplan.

Judge Kaplan refused introduction of any evidence by the defence.
The case will be thrown out. In the meantime they will have caused damage to Trump.
Which will definitely backfire as any person with a single brain cells can see that it is all a political witch-hunt by Biden handlers. I repeat ..Anybody with a single brain cell.

JessicaRabbit:
Has he though? Because the submission of your reddit buddy is brimming with more logical leaps than a kangaroo at the Olympics.



So, the judge said no to chitchat, and suddenly it's game over? Do you think legal systems operate on whims and tea breaks? Because newsflash, they don't.

Now moving on to your reddit companion...



Interesting accusation. We'll be examining its' merits shortly.



I hope he also has a PowerPoint presentation and laser pointer.



Let me just interject here because I think your friend has misrepresented Carroll's interview with Anderson Cooper here, where she said that "most people think of rape as being sexy" and that "they've tried it in their head". She did not explicitly say that rape is sexy or that she fantasizes about it. She was trying to explain the psychological phenomenon of rape myths, which are false beliefs that justify or minimize sexual violence. By distorting her words, your friend is only creating a straw man argument that is easier to attack than her actual position.



Oh boy! The anticipation is killing me! Just blurt it out already!



Okay, so let me get this straight.

He claims Jean Carroll's story is a Law & Order rip-off, but the only evidence he can offer is his hunch and a healthy dose of skepticism. Interestingly enough, he has already admitted that he KNOWS there is a photo of Carroll and Trump together in the 1980s, which is basically the receipt for their 80s meet-cute, but he conveniently chooses not to involve this fact in his analysis. LOL. Is it possible Carroll's accusation landed somewhere on the truth spectrum, with a few embellishments sprinkled on like confetti? Or maybe Trump tangoed with "inappropriate" instead of a full-blown foxtrot of felony? The point is, this ain't a choose-your-own-adventure with two predictable endings (false dilemma). There's a whole buffet of possibilities out there, and forcing a "pick one" just screams intellectual laziness.

This reddit clown accomplishes nothing special except quote Carroll out of context, omitting the parts where she clarifies that she was raped and that she does not find rape sexy. He also ignores the fact that she filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, not a criminal charge of rape. Then he compares her accusation to a fictional scenario from a TV show, and suggests that she made it up for attention or revenge. This is far from an honest analysis. It's a complete distortion and oversimplification of Carroll's case, neglecting to address the actual issues and evidence. Please tell your reddit buddy that the next time he tries to debunk someone, he should maybe bring more than just his gut feeling and a vague pop culture analogy or reference. Otherwise, he'll end up looking like he borrowed Sherlock Holmes' hat, but forgot the magnifying glass (and the deduction skills).



Given his most recent efforts, I won't be holding my breath.



You spin a yarn of overturned convictions, liberal tears causing tsunamis, and sea levels rising higher than Kanye West's ego. It's a doozy of a prediction, but one that relies more on dramatic flair than, you know, actual facts.



I appreciate your ability to make me laugh, even if it's unintentional.



So, Carroll likes unusual pet names. Big deal. Judging someone's morality or mental stability based on their pet names is more suited for a Disney villain origin story than a serious argument.

You come into this with absolute conviction that her story is true. In a following post, I also shared her tweets over time.She is a mentally sick woman .
She claims she can remember the dress she wore in 1994, it was never designed then.
Here is a more complete writeup of why this case is the worst travesty of justice in recent history. It is in agreement with that reddit user.

https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis-post/kassam-the-trump-carroll-case-is-blatantly-the-greatest-miscarriage-of-justice-in-modern-american-history/

You have to be a special one if you believe this crazy woman. What's a trial where you can't produce evidence to defend yourself.
She sued claiming death threats after Trump said she is not my type. She got threats on Twitter
What she admitted to was deleting tweets. Meaning she got threats before Trump made a statement. Her case is useless if she already had threats.

A collection of E Jean Carroll tweets.
Trump was not allowed to bring this to light. In ither words it was only her evidence the jury was allowed to hear.
American once touted itself as the most fair justice system.
Till the Marxists came to town.

Budaatum,some Reddit user seems to have done his homework 5 years ago. Judge objected to this line of questioning, and also refused defence to present her Anderson Cooper interview where she said rape is sexy.



Jean Carroll lied and based her entire accusation on a Law and Order SVU episode. Don't panic, I brought receipts.
I was initially convinced by the first reports that this story had some legs. There is a photo of them together back in the 80s, after all. But after doing a small amount of research and just listening to the woman speak publicly I am certain in saying that this event did not take place. Just as a reminder, the allegation is that (a certain orange person) joined her in the Bergdorf goodman dressing room and after she tried on some lingerie he sexually assaulted her.

First there is this moment on the news where she begins to waffle on her claim and states that the alleged encounter with (a certain orange person) "was not sexual" and "he did not push me down and ravish me" she goes on to say, even more bizarrely, "most women would find rape sexy" and "think of the 'rape' fantasies, Anderson."

Remember those last two quotes and hold on to your pants because this is where it gets interesting.

Jean Carroll insane television segment so we're all on the same page

I managed to come across minutes 41-45 of Law & Order Special Victims Unit Season 13 - Episode 11 "Theatre Tricks" (The entire premise of the episode is a "RAPE FANTASY" gone wrong as well as other "rape fantasies" within which is a scene describing the exact same event as Ms. Carroll asserts she experienced.
A woman and a man with engage in a role play "rape fantasy" in which the woman is trying on lingerie in the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.

I just want to remind everyone that in addition to once saying on CNN that "rape is sexy," E. Jean Carroll's accusation against Trump is an exact plot line from a 2012 Law & Order SVU episode.

She claimed that this was a complete coincidence when asked about it.

Her lawyers… pic.twitter.com/pUbsVJRdwG

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 25, 2024

Let's be clear, it could all be coincidental that her story and statements line up almost to the T with this the premise and scenes in this episode, but I have my suspicions. Watch the episode, that specific scene, and her public on air interviews and maybe you will come to a different conclusion.

I'm now in the process of cross referencing more quotes and stories of hers with that episode. Will update if I find more.

Case will be overturned on appeal Liberal tears will cause a sea level rise dwarfing melting of glaciers from global warming.
P/S Appreciate my intelligence.See how the two hoaxes I fused within one post resonate 😁😁😁

I also have the receipts. Here's the owner of
(a)a cat named Vagina and
(b) Dog named Tits
interview with Anderson Cooper Vanderbilt. He abruptly cuts her off after she fantasises about rape calling it sexy.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AL3Y2NYBhw

Fuckin unbelievable.

budaatum:
Come on basil, you should know this already, or are you really this slow?

I am buda. The buda that does not ignore reality and instead "suppose".

I don't do kraken.

No Kraken. She has no date, decade, year or season when the rape happened.Because it never or if she state a day, maybe on that day Trump was in the Virgin Galactic spacecraft miles above the earth.
And for real , the complaint is that he grabbed her by the pussy.
I'll get the actual series summary she loved watching which she roleplayed in this witch-hunt.

By the way, an ex-convict was identified by AI breaking into a sunglasses store and detained for two weeks. His alibi, he was in California jail 2000 miles away for breaking some probation violation. AI failure.
Before he was released, three inmates beat him up and raped him . Please keep him in your prayers.I don't think you are that soulless.

Jean Carroll can't give a date because Trump would most likely have a diary entry of where he was that day. Or a flight log or a TV interview a thousand miles away . But who cares , the left is on a winning roll. Alex Jones $1B, Fox news $750m Giuliani $138m, Trump $83m, Next will be Engoron $$$ billions fine and lifetime ban to Trump family for "breathing in Oxygen".

budaatum:
She is being investigated, as she rightly should be, and if found guilty, impeached and heavily fined and disbarred and jailed.

What about Tara Reid? She filed complaint case , JB supposedly has the documents sealed at UPenn library.
Clinton has never had to face Juanita Brodrick.

budaatum:
Dump, please defame E. Jean Carroll again.

Supposing he has never met her. He can't defend himself .Budaatum ejaculates.
That's election interference and Lawfare.
Anyway you only applaud when lawbreakers are crucifying one side. Fanny Willis to face impeachment .I said she is going down in flames. Black bitch complaining it's racist to go after her, Trump also joined the motion to dismiss saying she poisoned the jury.

IjeBos:
I remember early in Biden's administration, the same dunderheads who easily fall for right wing propaganda were saying Biden was killing Oil in the US, banning oil production. etc. etc. They are eerily quiet now.. I assume this is the reason.

U.S. oil production hits new high
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=60622

Who is fooling who? Biden won't sell LNG to Europe and Asia because of climate existential crisis. Europe is not getting Russian oil after blocking imports and from the blown up Nordstream.

feedthenation:
---Now Trump is blaming Biden for his trial---The jury found him liable for more damages:

$7.3 million in compensatory damages
$11 million to repair her reputation
$65 million in punitive damages

The jury barely deliberated for three hours.

Earlier in the year I posited Trump will lose every case brought before Obama and Clinton judges.Im not in the lil bit surprised by this judge, who sat for the first biased hearing.
Trump allies will also loose every case too in this election year
DoJ wants Navarro jailed in prison, as his appeal for the 4 months jail sentence goes on.Total b/s on this.
These sham cases are in Dem strongholds where juries ( can they be selected based on their biases) are likely democrats. Black juries are better for convicting Trump because criticising them is racist.
Mark Steyn is almost being bankrupted by climate alarmist Mann in a lawsuit running decades now. Mann us famous fir the hockey stick climate graph which Steyn alluded to it's being junk science. Mann has 10 lawyers, he has not paid a penny to them, someone else is footing his bill.
In this Trump trial Reid Hoffman is paying Jean Carroll's legal bill. Hoffman LinkedIn founder was a very good buddy of Epstein, Doubt he wants Trump to win.
That's Lawfare.

IjeBos:
Did you even read this article?

The article is biased and provides no evidence. Airlines are private companies whose business is to make profits. Different races dominate respective sectors Some from tradition,others from skills, others from physical abilities, others from.academic backgrounds etc.
Sports franchises eg Bball realized blacks are best hires, Chinese dominate karate movies, Jews are into banking and businesses, Indians dominate retail outlets , whites in SA dominate rugby, Zimbabwe cricket team is almost all white, women dominate in child bearing too😀😀.
If airlines didnt hire black pilots and have not l over the years in a globally competitive world, there should be other reasons for that, not just race.
Clinton once quipped " That guy would be bringing us coffee". Most people have a complex , diasporans look down on those in Umudike, African Americans look down on you, whites look down on other races, Arabs call blacks abed meaning slaves, etc.
You strive to lose your accent So that you are accepted either by your felliow black ghetto friends, or by your white employers and so on. Article should complain about race demographics among cowboys and in golf.
budaatum cant be hired by law firms or any PR firm over gross inability to communicate in the Queen's ( King's now?) langauge.

bemeruca:
Dems are the biggest hypocrites you will find on this planet.
They are everything they acuse conservatives of.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1JNpLdui1Y

Catchy article, Tha hediot has not read this.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/9/19/23879313/airline-pilots-white-men-diversity-race-gender-training-eileen-bjorkman


White men have ruled the sky as airline pilots, but that’s finally changing

IjeBos:
So, if your rivals say you did something illegal it's a persecution.
And if your own hand picked DOJ says you did something illegal it's also a persecution.
So, who do you think is capable of saying Trump did something illegal without it being persecution?

Or maybe, just maybe all these people are saying he is doing illegal things, because he is.

Find out all the roles Mary McCord has played since 2017.

basilico:
They will start squealing once they realize obiden might lose.
The Jan 6 fedsurrection will be revealed for it was. A complete setup.


The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “Milley is the Don Barzini of the Deep State… the most powerful chairman of the joint chiefs in history,” he continued. “It was Milley all along, and I didn’t realize it. Milley was manipulating this entire stuff from point start
“This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Maj. Gen. Walker, who commanded the D.C. Guard until April 2021, previously testified that he asked the Army leadership to authorize the deployment of the Guard as soon as then-Chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steven Sund requested it, but he was kept waiting for three hours and 19 minutes.
.”

There we have it. Nancy Pelosi pretending to worry about Trump using nuclear weapons in days leading to Jan 21 installation of Obiden and calling pentagon.
Gen Milley secretly calling his Chinese chief of staff assuring them he would stop Trump starting a war with china .He also called others countries
FBI director refusing to say how many agent provocateurs he had on the ground Jan 6.
Pelosi refusing Trump written offer of 10,000 national guardsmen made a week earlier for security on Jan 6.
Twitter immediately deleting Trump tweet of asking protesters to go home, Jackboot demanding control of Trump Twitter account.
Now we have Milley delaying deployment of National Guard for three hours and nineteen minutes on Jan 6.

Pelosi naming all members of Jan 6 committee, rejecting those put forward by Ranking House Member McCarthy. Jan 6 committee would harrass every trump staffer, looking for evidence to implicate Trump. The sham committee would later delete some evidence it collected after sharing it out with DOJ and Fanny Willis, while locking
up for 50 years everything else with the Archivist. . Thanks , the house has most of it
Footage of Jan 6 hidden by Pelosi, partially released by McCarthy, most of it still unavailable.

Jan 6 was a massive crime orchestrated by the democrats.Gen Milley is a traitor deserving a court martial.
Fedsurrection.

They will start squealing once they realize obiden might lose.
The Jan 6 fedsurrection will be revealed for it was. A complete setup.


The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “Milley is the Don Barzini of the Deep State… the most powerful chairman of the joint chiefs in history,” he continued. “It was Milley all along, and I didn’t realize it. Milley was manipulating this entire stuff from point start
“This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Maj. Gen. Walker, who commanded the D.C. Guard until April 2021, previously testified that he asked the Army leadership to authorize the deployment of the Guard as soon as then-Chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steven Sund requested it, but he was kept waiting for three hours and 19 minutes.
.”

raumdeuter:
Shouldn't grandpa come out to speak to why he should be voted for?

And why is grandpa the one that must be voted, Present another person and give a better option

Not verified. If it was the other way round, Obrigardo would be demanding front page

Trans movement Is a precursor to legalize paedophilia.
The pressure to accept the impossible that a man can be a woman is relentless. Pushed onto corporates, media, gov ,sports , educational institutions etc. It is almost if not already a crime to misgender someone. Biden Asst Sec of health transgendered at 54 , a farkin 4 star Admiral, who must be full of testosterone.
They have successfully forced trans as something normal.
As I stated previously, what's to prevent an adult identifying as a teenager? (One day he could have sex with them *legally* as a teen ) Worry no more. It's already happening.

"Perversion in the pool"
He's not identifying as an adult woman, he's identifying as a YOUNG GIRL.

He's competing with and against young kids.

He's changing & showering w/girls who are just entering puberty.

Is he alone with these kids?
Where are the DADS?
📹@RebelNewsOnline pic.twitter.com/27D76eYT6x

— Scarlett Johnson (@scarlett4kids) January 23, 2024

Second image is a 52 year old identifying as a 6 yr old,.Can't jail him if he fondles young girls and boys no. He has a couple more years to attain puberty.Would be quite a case if those guys iwho bang him are indicated on child sex charges

Reporter: "Where are you from?"

Middle Eastern illegal migrant: "Soon you will know who I am. Believe me. You will see."



This guy has been now been identified.A terrorist.group leader.
Over in Murica to preach peace I guess.