₦airaland Forum

sanpipita:
Lol basilico was on this forum calling for investigation and prosecution, he was even confident Obama will get indicted.

Why not. It could be argued he ordered the murder of America citizens.
European courts have indicted dictators and other leaders. A European court could indict Obama for knowingly arming ISIS. A local court would also include obstruction of justice for firing Michael Flynn after he said Obama was arming serious jihadists. Obama also has war crimes , forcible displacement of population in Libya, Syria and Iraqi Yazidis.

On his first day in office Biden threw the borders wide open.
There has been enemy infiltration, massive child trafficking, and fentanyl deaths.
Joe has thus aided the nations enemies and should be charged with recklessly endangering the citizens. He can be charged for his actions leading to increased human and drug trafficking .
Why wait until he is out, so that his current 'immunity' lapses?

DeepSight:
What an odd statement. So what crime is it permitted to commit "under presidential authority?"

PS: The Watergate Scandal which was Nixon's downfall involved wrongful acts done as president - thus what one may call abuse of office.

I would say Nixon was the president acting on party interests
Obama acting as president ordered the murder of US citizens while abroad in a nation not at war.

DeepSight:
A pardon, even if controversial, is altogether different from a claim of presidential immunity.

Nixon crime was not done under presidential authority.

wirinet:
So you agree with Trump that a former president can send seal 6 team to assassinate his political opponents and he should not be prosecuted and punished because a president enjoys absolute immunity. In that case, Joe Biden should just order the assassination of Donald Trump, Mike Johnson, and Mitch McConnell, while at it, he should bomb fox news headquarters to the ground making sure Sean Hanity, Tucker Carlson and judge jeanine is inside.

Lyndon Johnson pardoned Nixon .
Nixon would have been prosecuted.

Raynald:
Am not American but i think convicting a Former President on a crime he commited when he was the President is actually not the way forward.Or will this crimes be classified into convictable and non-convictable.
Cause they are about to initiate political witch hunt of opposing party.I think Obama and all former Presidents still alive should buckle up for what's coming

DC is 90,% plus democrats. No jury can ever convict Obama..
He would be tried in DC One crime comes to mind. He ordered a drone strike on an American terrorist and his son in a country the US was not at war with and on a civilian building. Al Alwaki and huscson were in Yemen when by presidential order , a hellfire missile was launched at them.

This Biden has been all out to help Iran just like Obama. IDF has evidence they Been bankrolling Hamas, but Biden went on to reinstate their frozen assets which they obviously used to fund their terror proxies.

This evening, we are publishing some of the intelligence information found there by our forces – indicating a direct “connection” from Iran to Hamas and more so – to Yahya Sinwar. We found official Hamas documents from 2020 detailing the funds transferred by Iran between the years 2014 and 2020 to Hamas and to Sinwar. More than one hundred and fifty million dollars were transferred from Iran to Hamas. This is another example of how Iran exports terror across the Middle East. The terror that Iran exports and produces is a global problem. The

Obrigardo:
I remember when you hounded us then with all the tales of election fraud and these stupid veritas was one of the major sources you cited.
Now are you ashamed yet? don't you feel foolish now?

I think i need to unearth all your election fraud conspiracy posts.

Veritas is not the absolute truth. On the other hand they ejected it's founder James o Keefe who went on to start OMG which has done some pretty good busting.
Veritas was raided by FBI because of Ashley Biden diary. The FBI intention was to bury the contents, especially where Ashley said she used to take showers with Pedo Pete, her dad. Ashley wrote in her diary that she thinks it was inappropriate to do so. Which dad showers with his daughter?
Hunter Biden hacked icloud account revealed that the contact he had saved as Pedo Pete was actually his dad's.
Joe and Jill knew Hunter was face timing while nude with his niece, his late brother's daughter. Hunter was also banging his late brother's wife
Can you stop supporting degenerates.

Obrigardo:
Only thing criminal trump did was the tax cuts that only helped the likes of elon and co.
He was an utter failure.

Let's be honest here. Tax cuts did nothing to help everyone.Show us the
some evidence

The immunity rejection. Appears designed to proceed with Jackboots trial. Initially I read of tinelines with an enbanc review suspending the trial, but the judges have apparently ruled on that
I am not surprised by the appealate judges. Two were appointed by Joe Biden and the other by George Bush. Both Bush and Biden hate Trump.

budaatum:
The dumb asses failed to impeach Alejandro Mayorkas.

Final vote was Yea 214, Nay 216.

The majority of Republican has been whittled by resignations of the speaker and some one else. Plus the expulsion by RINOs of George Santos. Democrats have the majority in the house, they are only lacking the gavel

Obrigardo:
basilico loco with his strong coconut head. You have consistently posted trash about all the prosecutors holding criminal trump to the fire. ALL OF THEM!

Are you not tired or even ashamed a little bit?

In this particular case, someone bought a fake vax card. A vax that does not stop infection

IjeBos:
Trump is not immune from prosecution.
It was a Unanimous ruling of the 3 Judge panel.
He has until Feb. 12 to seek a stay from the Supreme Court or his criminal case will continue.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/trump-immunity-appeals-court.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20240206&instance_id=0&nl=breaking-news&ref=headline&regi_id=75289398&segment_id=157435&user_id=41c9d58298cfae5beaf0adde0a0b0423

I thought he could apply for a full hearing by all the judges. 11 of them and Only 4 conservatives So it might just throw out his petition.

This mickey mouse DA Alvin Bragg effort to prosecute vax deniers brought to a screeching halt. In his mind they must be Trump supporters.
The defendants must have spent a lot of money paying laywers in a frivolous case brought by a DA who is also using an archaic law to target Drumph.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg attempted to charge two New York residents with felonies for having false vaccine passports while he has let off others charged with far worse crimes scot-free.

New York State Supreme Court Justice Brendan T. Lantry dismissed the felony charges against the rdecisionesidents, identified as J.O. and R.V. in the , who had bought the forged vax passports, usurping Bragg's decision.
judge wrote in the opinion, "Clearly, Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree (Penal Law § 170.25) is not among the most serious crimes in the New York Penal Law, nor are the factual allegations against Defendants R.V. and J.O. particularly serious in nature."

"Moreover, the factual allegations — that the Defendants purchased fake COVID-19 vaccination cards so that they could provide same to their employer (R.V.) and school (J.O.) — do not rise to the level of the majority of the crimes adjudicated in Supreme Court, New York County, namely homicide, sexual assault, drug sale, robbery, burglary, and other violent and non-violent serious felony offenses," Lantry continued.

bemeruca:
So you are saying the same thing? With what you are responding to 🤣

Lmao, you are dumb

Na wah oh. Wisdom will kill u.

IjeBos:
Here's a riddle.
If you have 4500 inadmissible alien encounters at the border on a given day. How many inadmissible aliens would be allowed into the country that day?
Let me help you, since it seems quite a complex calculation for you.
0. The answer would be 0. As they are inadmissible. 🤣 🤣 🤣

Liar. We have ran out liars here and you are still here. Ask Jessicarabbit who has gone to the dark web for advice.
Biden bill allows expulsion if 5000 target is reached per day.
Your fibs. Expel 5000 per day

Totally incongruent with the what the bill propagates

Guy jump into a lake

IjeBos:
Here is more fiction, a poem.



That is what is actually written on the Statute of Liberty. America is a land of immigrants. Those who came here seeking a better life. That is our national identity. And as you know, everyone in America is an immigrant (outside of the Native Americans).

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1754315351855100084.html?utm_campaign=topunroll

Food for thought. American Legal.
Right wing. Be informed by comparison of right wing vs evil left wing.
Thread does justice.
Don't even know why I'm enlightening you.

IjeBos:
Are you still having a hard time with the laws that Trump used and the stats that showed that he ended illegal immigration. Well, of course I already knew the answer. The stats don't show that. And the laws weren't there so he did some by Exectuvice Orders, some that were found illegal by courts. And he also used a Public Health Emergency action due to covid to shut down the border (Title 42). And some say that he used it not in the means it was intended.
I thought of this post when I saw Crenshaw's tweet. As you know Crenshaw is a very conservative Republican House member.

From my brainwashing sites vs yours.
Title 42 was a covid law. Biden allowed it to lapse. No laws broken.

Remain in Mexico policies. Biden revoked it.

When Trump was POTUS massive caravan were organised by NGOs and non profits. This led to a surge of border interactions. The media blitz showed women and children mostly ignoring then military aged men fleeing persecution from nations never at war.
They showed cages where children were held separated from their parents with AOC shedding tears peering into chicken wire fencing.A stage managed scene. They cried about cages ignoring Obama had built them

IjeBos:
This is a more detailed synopsis of the bill. I initially posted the Fox News version as I assumed, their write up would be the most unfavorable to the bill.
https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/emergency_national_security_supplemental_section-by-section.pdf

Below is the definition of encounters. It ecompasses both Apprehensions and Expulsions. So theoretically, the border agents could expel 5000 immigrants (none meet the qualifications for asylum) in a day and it would trigger the closure of t
he border and also stop anyone from claiming asylum who is caught illegally entering the US not at the borders. That with the enhanced screening and new rules as to who is not permitted from claiming asylum (1 being if you could have claimed asylum in a country you crossed before coming into the US), again I think it's a tough bill.

Very clever way of lying. It's not about expelling 5000 a day. It's about stopping the 5001th one from claiming assylum that day. The 5001th one and the rest wait outside the border till the following day
5000 granted entry with no repatriation a day means 1.5m illegals allowed in per year.

bemeruca:
You didn't ask him why it is convenient for him to be lining up with fox news.

The bill is a useless bill, it only encourages more people to the border.

I've asked here why they need more people, ie why do democrats always push for more illegal immigrants?
One congressman recently said that it's because census counts everyone, and congressional districts are based on whole total population, not just citizens.

IjeBos:
This is a Fox News Reporter's take on the new immigration bill that should be up for vote in the Senate soon. From this take it's a tough bill. I think it significantly changes how asylum has been done making it much harder to get, harder to claim and even when it is claimed reducing the processing time from years to 90 days. It makes it a less opportunistic way of entering the country and seems to get rid of some of the abuse we've been seeing.

So 5000 new illegals every day are welcome.
What's do good about that.

Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), expressed his opinion of the bill in a more colorful way, “This bill is the worst screwing in the Senate since that Dem staffer filmed his

budaatum:
I know dump does not pay his lawyers but I'm very certain magas will donate to a crowdfund you set up to present this evidence in court in dump's defence.

A reasonable dump might even pay you 10% of $83.3 if you reduce it to zero.

That's what she said in Court. I don't have the court transcripts but the little I've read is that She blamed Donald Trump for all her problems never mind she is eighty or so.

Where is the liar Jessicarabbit? Jean Carroll life is documented by her in this tell all
You lied she didn't get laid after the rape, Well it's in her own words. She never wore that dress again. She has not been screwed again.
Yet in her shows and interviews was always about sex, anal sex, lessons from 'My Dog'" whatever she meant.

Long read, she details all her hideous men in her life.

https://www.thecut.com/article/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html#_ga=2.208057690.931097574.1705722541-1999883557.1705722541

Excerpt .


down on the escalator. As soon as I land on the main floor, I run through the store and out the door — I don’t recall which door — and find myself outside on Fifth Avenue.

And that was my last hideous man. The Donna Karan coatdress still hangs on the back of my closet door, unworn and unlaundered since that evening. And whether it’s my age, the fact that I haven’t met anyone fascinating enough over the past couple of decades to feel “the sap rising,” as Tom Wolfe put it, or if it’s the blot of the real-estate tycoon, I can’t say. But I have never had sex with anybody ever again


Exposing your lies.

Easy man. I specified where I got that phrase from By a white person. In private they use the N word but it's not allowed for them to use it
in puboic the way blacks use it.
Never think that whites think you are their equals very few of them love the black race but they can't say it in public.
People like Letitia are being used by the white liberals to take down their opponent. You think the white democrats feel anything for her? Never She is just a useful idiot to them , a tool for them.

IjeBos:
This is a shockingly racist, sexist and disgusting post. The level of racism basilico spews here, it's hard for me to believe he's a black Nigerian.

jessicarabbit
Your lies are too many. You really lie like a professional psychopath if such a phrase exists.
Blassey Ford had refused to testify saying she does not fly. She got a lawyer months before her testimony and also released a polygraph test. She didn't know who paid for the test, as if that's shocking news.She flew to DC for testimony, the same character who was reportedly Boeing/Airbus etc phobic.

A psychologist by proffession? She had helped some friend pass a lie detector test earlier.

Obrigardo:
President Biden has the solid black and white base. Even in the whitest of the whitest counties, they all came out for President Biden.
Yet basilico loco keeps on masturbating about the prospect of a 2nd criminal trump presidency, after all his dirty lifestyle? Don't be dumb, criminal trump is not and never coming back to the White house. Even if he contested against Kamala's stove, he will lose woefully and it won't be close.
Fùck the polls.

Where would you be without white xtians?

JessicaRabbit:
LOL. I'm sorry, are you here for a debate or a remedial class? Had you bothered to acquaint yourself with even the most rudimentary legal terminology, perhaps your arguments wouldn't have resembled a toddler's first attempt at finger painting. Rape is a specific type of sexual abuse, but not the only one. Sexual abuse can include any unwanted sexual contact, such as groping, handling, kissing, or penetrating. The jury said Trump did that to Carroll, which means he violated her bodily autonomy and consent. Who cares if he raped her or not? That's not what they were asked to decide.

Questioning Carroll's credibility based on her personal life is a classic ad hominem fallacy -- attacking the person instead of the argument. Carroll's personal life has nothing to do with her argument. That's like saying you can't trust a chef because he likes pizza. Who cares if she hasn't slept with anyone else since Trump? Does that make her story less true? And why do you think women always get emotional about sex? Are you saying women are crazy and men are smart? That's a load of baloney, and you know it. And your allegations against Judge Kaplan remain unfounded. He has a reputation for being a fair and impartial jurist, who has handled many major cases such as:

(1) The trial of Osama bin Laden's son-in-law

(2) The extradition of a Mexican drug lord

(3) The fraud case against Exxon Mobil.

You have no credible evidence that he is a political hack, nor a Trump hater. The only thing we've continuously established in this discussion is that you have ZERO proof for your nonsense. You just fling shit constantly at the wall and hope that it sticks. Kaplan is a top-notch judge, who did his job by the book and the facts.

It's not my fault that you're wantonly ignorant of the law to the point where you don't even understand legal definitions and terms. You have no clue about the difference between criminal and civil cases, or the level of proof needed for each. You also have no idea what battery and defamation mean, or how they relate to Carroll's case. And you're the one who's dodging the evidence, trying to divert attention from the fact that Trump was busted for sexually abusing and slandering Carroll. Calling the Trump v Carroll case a sham is just you throwing irrelevant tantrums over the results. In the real world, it's a historic win for survivors of sexual abuse. Carroll is one of the many women who have courageously spoken up about being attacked by Trump. She is also one of the few who have taken him to court and won, and she has proven that no one is above the law, not even the ex-president.

You have failed to demonstrate any intellectual or political acumen, any wit or style, or any decency or civility. You have failed, miserably and completely. And that, my friend, is the true tea!

Correct me on this and don't spring out your lies.
She met Donald at the entrance She was happy to assist him buy lingerie for a woman. They walked into 6th floor section , picked out some kinky stuff. She asked him jokingly to try it on. All the same she walked into a changing room to try it on. Trump followed her, closed the door and inserted his fingers in her vagina. Then he dropped his pants and inserted his dick. She can't remember whether it went in half way or full. She walked out after the act and never told anyone.She never wore that dress again. She does not remember the year that happened. She said in court that Donald destroyed her love life And has never been with another man since 25 years later.
Questions.
The jury found he sexually violated her but did not rape her. The judge in the courtroom told Trump that he inserted his fingers in her vagina. How did the jury arrive at the conclusion that he was liable for sexual violation but NOT rape?They talked to a fly that was on the wall?

basilico:
"His Airness" six NBA teams title winning sneakers
Sold for a record $8m in a Sotheby auction.
Darn you Americans have cash to burn.

CNN ^ | Updated 9:46 AM EST, Sat February 3 2024
Basketball legend Michael Jordan won six NBA championships during
his prolific sporting career – and a set of the six sneakers he worewhen
clinching those titles has sold for a record-breaking $8 million at auction.

Friday’s winning bid for “The Dynasty Collection” reached $8,032,800,
setting a new global auction record for game-worn sneakers, according
to auction house Sotheby’s.

The set consisted of Air Jordan VI (1991), Air Jordan VII (1992),
Air Jordan VIII (1993), Air Jordan XI (1996), Air Jordan XII (1997),
and Air Jordan XIV (1998).

Why I brought brought this up .
Brand valuation.
From the minute Letitia James brought up the inflating assets case vs Trump I have repeatedly stated that Trump name is a brand And one day will be priceless. Noone has given me the worth of the brand.
I asked how much Eiffel Tower is valued, crickets I got because it's construction cost is in the €70-80m range but it's valued at over €300B.
I think I also asked how much the $20 dollar gloves Michael Jackson wore were worth. I went on a tirade about valuation and I think Ibime hit out saying it's voodoo economics or something like that.
Actually I asked which Bugatti would sell more , Samuel Eto's or Christian Ronaldo.
Back to dish washer sized nipples owner Letitia ( I borrowed this quote from reddit) . One example Mar a Lago she put it at $18m whereas villas in that area can go 5 times higher. Mar a Lago can be priceless. In just this valuation Letitia failed, and the case should be thrown out. She used a brick $ mortar valuation and annual revenue to fool dimwits into thinking the case ha a there there. The brand-name associated with Mar a Lago gives it a value, not the site acquisition and construction cost.
Ditto all property valuations owned by Trump that she listed in court.

@jessicarabbit Letitia James case is just a witch-hunt . One of your many pathological lies debunked.

That's why $3000 dollar sneakers were snapped up for $8m.
It's the brand.Stupid.
Note Trump does not own all properties branded with his names. He lenda out his name and gets paid. Trump as a name is a brand .

JessicaRabbit:
Phew! you really scraped the bottom of the barrel to find a source that backs up your fantasy that Carroll and Reade were plotting against Biden. The link you shared is from Townhall, a website that makes Fox News look like the BBC. The article you cited is based on a chopped-up video clip from a documentary called "The Hunting of Biden", which was made by a Trump fanboy who has already been busted for lying and twisting facts. The clip shows Carroll and Reade chatting like old pals, but it does not show any confession from Carroll that she only supported Blasey Ford to save abortion rights. Actually, Carroll has said that she trusts both Reade and Blasey Ford, and that she stands

with women who speak up about sexual assault. I get that you have a hard time accepting reality, but please, get a grip.

And don't you have any shame repeating a lie that Carroll was wearing a dress from the future when she was attacked? This lie was first cooked up by Trump's lawyer, Boris Epshteyn, who said that the dress was not made by Donna Karan until years after 1994, but it was busted by many sources, including Donna Karan herself, who said that the dress was from her 1993 collection. Carroll also showed a photo of herself in the dress in 1993, and a receipt from Bergdorf Goodman, the store where she got the dress and where the assault happened. Do you really think Carroll was celibate for decades because Trump supposedly raped her? That's a ridiculous and offensive assumption. Carroll never claimed that she stopped having sex or dating after the alleged attack, or that it ruined her love life. She said that she didn't tell anyone or report it to the cops, because she was scared of Trump's revenge and felt guilty for what happened. She also said that she finally spoke up in 2019, when she saw Trump lie about the other women who accused him of sexual abuse. As for Blasey Ford, did you skip the part where she swore under oath in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2018, and gave reliable and consistent details of her accusation? She also aced a lie detector test and had backup evidence from her therapist and her hubby. You have ABSOLUTELY ZERO proof that she was driven by politics rather than civic duty and personal trauma. She said that she had to come forward after finding out that Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court, and that she worried about the consequences of his confirmation for women and girls. She also said that she suffered from anxiety, depression, and PTSD because of the assault, and that she had to move and hire bodyguards because of the threats and harassment she faced after going public. Your arguments are as empty as a vacuum, and it shows. But please, don't let me stop your game of make-believe. I'm actually having fun exposing your silly claims.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/townhall/

You are such a liar. Everything above is a complete lie.
Townhall is a reputable source that leftie fact checkers don't like and smears it at every opportunity.
Your stories are complete lies. You can't post your sources because they are all Twitter . Nairaland removes Twitter amd *tt.co* short links ( omit the first t - To see the short link) hence you are unable to show your sources.

Let's start with this and her attorney. Where was NYT fat checker mentioned here debunked if not in your mind orvtwitter links?
‘Monica Lewinsky-type’ dress.”

“She originally claimed that the ‘event’ happened in 1994, and that she wore the Donna Karan dress on that day. The problem is that New York Times Fact Checkers found the dress wasn’t even made by Donna Karan until long after 1994,” Trump said on Truth Social.

Lies upon lies from you. You said Trump refused to offer his DNA to Jean Carroll. I would also refuse because it's easy to plant DNA on another surface.. You can't have someone accuse you vaguely then demand your DNA as prrof. A strand has enough DNA .
I will debunk your Twitter sourced lies in the course of the day.
Starting with your DNA lies it's the Judge refused Trump's offer of DNA later , wonder why?

bemeruca:
Michimichi

You can thank immigration for that. Somalia has 1 church and 1000 xtians out of 17m population.Now that's Dar-el-Islam meaning house of peace where everyone is a Muslim.

IjeBos:
Thanks for the post. It's a good teaching example of what an "Appeal to Authority" logical fallacy looks like. Why should I be listening to Elon Musk about immigration? People should save it if they want to know how not to construct an argument.

It also seems like you've found the people from "both left and right" Zendi was referring to. Lol.


I am not sure why Conservatives like to let other think for them and propagandize to them. Seems like such Beta thing to do. There's a plethora of information out there about immigration including facts and figures and good articles about the complexity of it. Google, Read, Learn. It's clear you have the time to be informed if you keep posting this nonsense.

Pains you because the Great Replacement does not appear to be a conspiracy theory after all.
Biden I have shared here before spoke glowingly of constant unmeasurable immigration till whites were a minority. All his actions on immigration reflects what he said in that video clip .

Obrigardo:
Are you looking for a way to link this to DEI or CRT?

Mike Jordan didn't use wokeness and race to win everybody's heart. He is a democratt which is his right. His shoes were and are boughtt by all races. Whites have made him more money than blacks and he respects that.
He like millions of other blacks worked their way out of the reparations bracket.
Michael Jordan kept his shoes as a souv + reminder, I'm not sure whether the proceeds go to charity.
Woke democrats can only advice others to kerp semen stained dresses for a rainy day Or dresses that were designed years after a fake rape took place .