₦airaland Forum

DeepSight:
This is also the definition of rape in Nigeria.
I think the only issue we may have is the interpretation of consent.
And its a tricky one.
Because if one were to take it to an extreme, then even while already in a consensual act of sexx, if she says "stop" and you thrust one more time - Is that rape?

Think this started with me talking about Tyson case, He had been to a pageant and he was talking to ladies telling them he wanted a focck , Once one refused he moved on to the next one and asked the same. At that time he was on top of the world and celebrities have groupies throwing themselves at their feet,.
This particular one was actually collected from her room driven around and later landed in Tysons room at 2 am.

In short Tyson in as crude as he was had made his intentions known. The jury was apalled by his testimony when he testified that he had told her he wants to focck her at the pageant.

Grey area for rape in that case . That has always been my opinion.

Obrigardo:
You keep on reinforcing the idea that you know so little about life, and you are not well travelled, and immersed in another culture outside your outdated Manchurian hateful life.
The fact you clearly overlook any, or if just one of Criminal trumps crimes shows you are a dumpster. You don't have a clear bias for anything other than your hateful agenda.

You are a victim of media brainwashing, wonder how you live with yourself afraid of looking at alternate ideas that question your sordid world views.

ono:
But Bas, at what point did the vast majority of the American public stopped thinking for themselves, verifying news and their sources and ensuring that they're well informed?

I think that at the root of all these deceptions dished out by the fake news and lamestream media is a ready market of gullible people - the likes of Obrifaggot, Jimeta, buda and the rest of them. These Fake News people will not sell their wares and have a large followership if people can check things out and call them "LIARS" to their face!

I would probably think that since we were born the media has always pushed an agenda. Bush had a lot of backing esp after 9/11 such that he was able to create agencies that could spy on its own citizens while ferreting out potential terrorists. which was a noble cause.

Ill get flack for this. After Bush came Saint Obama , he who cannot be criticized because he bleck. Under him the media became an extension of the Intelligence Community, the IC uses the media and big tech to peddle any narrative and stonewall any negative story concerning the left . For instance DC votes 90% plus for Democrats. A republican getting tried there has absolutely no chance of getting a fair jury.

For instance this article describes how the WH under Obama created an echo chamber. a story would be disseminated to a particular media. then the rest would repeat that story for the next few weeks until a new thing came up. This is what bedevilled Trump . you had all media 24/7/365 saying negative things about him.
https://heavy.com/news/2016/05/ben-rhodes-iran-speechwriter-echo-chamber/

He admitted the White House put them there. “They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say,” Rhodes said to the Times, admitting they were essentially cheerleaders of the Iran Nuclear deal. He also added that the average White House reporter is just 27 years old and that their only reporting experience is around political campaigns and that “they literally know nothing.

Simpletons like Obrigardo obviously peruse these echo chambers and see that one media is confirming the other End up believing the lies.
Unfavorable stories are stonewalled, ignored or all media declares them debunked or Russian propaganda.

In short under the Saint the IC merged with the media and big tech to push any narrative , knowing that 50% will believe any BS and half of the other 50% will not get a rebuttal.

benalvino3:
Biden Brags about how he beats inflation as the stock market crashed over 1100 points due to inflation Voltron Ibime, please come and explain this to us. Inflation up 1%

Spending and printing money is causing inflation, what did Biden do? Spend more and print more. I am sure it's Russia or Hitler's bombs as Voltron's Counterpart buda will say.

he is celebrating and you cannot make this up.

Ben, the left is on a wining streak. Biden spox a few days ago said this was the best economy ever. Noone questioned her but clowns that I wont name will echo that sentiment because it was said by biden admin.
At the same time they say Trump was the worst president ever . A lot of democrats and left ( Obrigardo) believe that based on a few mean tweets from Trump.

With help of big tech and media the left is fully controlling the narrative. You will see lefties praise Biden as you have opined, The left is in a position to state any lie and know that 50% will believe it , and most of the other 50% wont get to hear any rebuttal.
What was the purpose of Joe Biden stopping the border wall and cancelling the deal with Mexica about illegal immigrants crossing over to be held in Mexico? At least 5 million have been welcomed by the Biden without so much vetting. no covid protocols for them , they are given phones to track them. 5m in 1.5 years is a lot of people to let in. I dont have a problem with the people but the drug menace is rising.
Joe wants to destroy America, then they can rebuild it.

budaatum:
Tyson was not convicted just because a witness said he raped her. If not, Clarence Thomas and Kavanaugh would have been jailed too.

https://www.indianapolismonthly.com/longform/down-for-the-count-lawyers-look-mike-tyson-rape-trial

Displaying ignorance. For Tyson it was rape.No witnesses to determine whether it was consensual or forced. For both Justices women crawled out of the woodwork claiming that they were talked to in a sexxual manner and they only came out when it came to supreme court nomination while both had been vetted before .

Tyson was a curious case because I dont see how a guy with a reputation hits on you, picks you up at 2 am and you go to his hotel room. Maybe she did not like it , some men are brutes And Tyson with his bad boy image was not exactly a darling of the jury.

wirinet:
Rough or gentle, it's still boils down to evidence presented. What's actually happened in the room is between only the two of them and God. But the evidences presented in court was enough to convince a jury of 12 beyond all reasonable doubt.

There was zero evidence presented in court by Trump's lawyers to support the rigging allegations. They did not accuse any one (in court that is) of participating in the rigging. It it possible to bring a rigging allegations without charging and convicting those that did the rigging? Instead of Trump's lawyers to sue Dominion for rigging elections, its Dominion instead that is suing Trump's lawyers for defamation.

How do you know that there was zero evidence? Incase the laws were changed unilaterally , the court should have granted a hearing.
The loser is also handicapped in getting hard evidence , thats why courts should have granted discovery And the relevant documents produced by election officers,

It doesnt take stupid to notice that MSM uses the same keywords no evidence, baseless, big lie, etc. this was a well coordinated take down . Ask Marc Elias how many states he convinced to switch to mail in voting for instance.

Lets leave it at that

naptu2:
AJ+@ajplus



https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/1569348500101398528




https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/1569378948819058688

The royal family have a lot of properties -rentals in the billions. King George? transfered the property to the Gov as Crown Estate and the Govt in turn provides the royals with 100m annually for their expenses.
The rent from those properties turn out a profit of which a fraction of it is funnelled back to the royal family
I think all those castles save for two are owned by the Crown Estate.

The Crown Estate wealth would be around 13-14B pounds.

wirinet:
Lies mixed with false narrative. The proof of evidence for rape is as stringent that of murder.
First you have to proof that there was sex in the first place, before you are required to prove whether its consensual or rape. You need medical, forensic and physical evidence to prove rape before a jury of 12. Finally you need witnesses to collaborate your evidences. Witnesses without any medical, forensic and physical evidence would be thrown out by the judge.
Watch his video to understand the perspectives of the Mike Tyson case.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRawW--T24

Now where are the evidences of election rigging you guys are so obsessed with. Which evidences were presented before any courts before calling on witnesses to support?

I wont go into this but some guys are rough when it comes the act. It was her word against bad boy Tyson.

wirinet:
The testimony of a witness or witnesses alone cannot be used to prosecute a criminal case.
First you need there to be an actual murder. Meaning there has to be a body certified dead by a qualified medical doctor. You cannot assume a missing person even after 20 years as murder.

Secondly, in most cases you gave to present murder weapon or means of murder, and also a medical report that the murder weapon was the cause of death of the deceased.

Thirdly, you have to prove motive and premeditation to differentiate the case from manslaughter or even self defense.

Finally, you have to prove these beyond "all reasonable doubts".

If all you have in a murder case is a bunch of affidavits or witnesses, the judge will throw you out for wasting his or her time.

Replying your stupids assertions can be quite annoying. I do not expect to be explaining basic issues to a supposedly educated person.

Very lazy people . Mike Tyson was convicted of rape . He went with a pageant to his hotel room at 3 am in the morning. Two days later she ran to the hospital claiming Tyson raped her. whether she was a gold digger or not no one knows. It was just her word against Tyson which got him 10 yeas sentence.

budaatum:
You are very dumb. Have you considered I might pay two people to claim they witnessed me say "God bless the King" instead if all you have is your own "two witnesses"?

Its a trick your dump uses so why do you think I might not use it too, you dumb fùq!

Did not know that you are that dumb. I always thought you are one of those never do well critics who sit in their momma's basement and troll people.

The testimony of a witness that he saw the accused commit or participate in the commission of the crime for which the accused is being tried shall be admissible in evidence in a criminal prosecution in any trial court ordained and established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 90–351, title II, § 701(a), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 211.)

budaatum:
When, Basilico, did I become the court where eyewitness evidence is insufficient especially since eyewitnesses may give contradictory evidence?

Trust me. I know you are that stupid to think any evidence blind you claim to have witnessed would be accepted by me who knows you are blinded by kraken.

What are we differing about. Eye witness testimony is very important in legal esp criminal proceedings. If you shout right now in UK that you want the monarchy gone , they will come for you tomorrow.
All they will need is two witnesses corroborating that they saw and heard you shout Then your sorry buttt will be hauled off to jail.

What is the thing about believe all women? When there are only two people in a room . Do you need forensics to believe the women

budaatum:
Which court relies on eye witness testimony?

Basilico, you keep finding new depths in the pit of stupidity! Eye witnesses did not only provide verbal evidence in George Floyd murder, they recorded videos too, but you didn't rely on that evidence, did you!

Are you that dumb seriously? When you are as witness to a crime you need video evidence. What school did you go to?
I did not think you are that stupid

Jan 17 1991 Baghdad . Cruise missiles knock out power stations


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsncQ6O4wYw

budaatum:
No it isn't evidence to me, nor is it evidence in a court of law. What it is is hearsay, unless supported by verifiable evidence.

I'm not bothering with the rest of your rubbish.

Eye witness testimony is what courts rely on in many cases
I know Biden has never sniffed your hair for you to adore him with a see no evil hear no evil attitude. But your hatred for Trump exceeds that of a murderer who not not only murders his victim but chops up the body parts and eats some parts raw.

benalvino3:
talking rubbish as usual. why is the Netherlands imposing wreck less policies on its farmers?

Netherlands is implementing Green New Deal , Reduce the amount of amount of nitogen ie fertilizer by reducing size of land to be farmed by 30 %.
The land now free will be used for housing immigrants. What nonsense is that?
Also reduce the amount of livestock to reduce Carbon dioxide.

Leftists are just totally bonkers. Plants emit CO₂ at night but all plants require it for photosynthesis.
Infortunately these scientists can never get in a debate with fellow scientists who doubt their claim , simply ending the topic by saying the science is settled.

saxywale2:
The bolded. If statement.

Trump called Putin's strategy "genius" for invading Ukraine, so he is not going to support Ukraine's resistance, and Tucker is currently being dragged in twitter.

Actually I have seen an article where he is calling them to end the war in April. While th EU and Biden is arming that comedian.
Trump approach is more sensible. Once the war ends West will rebuild Ukraine using their taxpayers money

benalvino3:
Germany is experiencing a trade deficit. something they haven't experienced forever. The Eurozone(currency) relies on a strong Germany to keep the economy afloat as well as a strong France. But these countries are shooting themselves in the foot. this is something Budaatum and Ibime never understand. They keep acting like everything is okay because they support policies that destroy a nation... But will see how revolting EU citizens have become.

If Trump would publicly ( has he?) support Ukraine resistance they would all change and support Putin.

budaatum:
I think you don't even know the meaning of evidence. If we ask you for any you will point to 2000 Mules.

People involved in the tallying process filing an affidavit saying that there was a lot of shenaninagans going on is not evidence to you.
CCTV footage of Ruby Freeman counting votes multiple times at a time when the counting had been stopped and the observers had left is not evidence. Footage of Ruby pulling a black case from under the table and start counting is not evidence

CNN CEO wants the channel to focus on news , not propaganda. you still have MSNBC,NBC, etc plus WAPO to poison your already closed mind to reality

Twisting facts . You swear an affidavit , If the case starts you become a witness.
electors have alwats challenged. In 2017 Clinton democrats rose up to object but they had no substance and their objections were overuled by Biden.
In 2021 electors rose up to object . Then a pipe bomb was discovered and the session adjourned. 15 minutes later Ray Epps gang of rioters made their way into the capitol. The session was adjourned because of two pipe bombs not because of the protesters.

I dont want to get into this.

wirinet:
Provide evidence that evidence was presented before any judge outside affidavits. Affidavits can never pass as evidence to upturn an election anywhere in the world.

If you say that judges up to the Supreme Court did not want to touch the hot potato, then who will you blame? Then how else do you challenge an election? Stop the Congress from certifying the elections?

I am still tying to understand why you are still whining about an election that had been decided in the courts and legislature two years ago. It just does not make sense.

wirinet:
What's the FBI going to investigate when the Justice Department headed by Bull Barr said the election was free and fair and all elections monitoring groups agreed.

What will the judge look at when you guys failed to submit any evidence to the courts. Its only on social media that you submit evidence. If one judge is bias, are you also alleging that all the judges up till the supreme court are slso bias?

Rudi Gulianni, Sydney Powell and other Trump's lawyers admitted they have no actual evidence, so what did you expect the judges to do?

I how long you will continue yo wail, the election was stolen without producing any evidence. You are becoming schizophrenic over this matter that you require medical help.

You say no evidence was presented,. It was - but judges did not want to touch that hot potato.

saxywale2:
The poster is talking about New World Order conspiracy.

I recommend the book below.

Did you play the clip really because you cannot accuse the poster while all he is doing is reporting what the leaders said?

I cant read that book its all crap I can smell crap from miles away..

By any chance what are these people talking about ?

https://twitter.com/JohnDo1344/status/1568984110257045505

budaatum:
Courts still don't seem to want to listen much to any of his cases, and those they do listen to seem to be criticized as being filed by incompetent lawyers.

You sure your dump is paying his legal fees, because his lawyers sound more like carpenters.

The FBI never bothered to investigate , claiming that the elections were free n secure despite evidence. The media also went into overdrive using words like baseless, most secure, big lie in a cordinated attack on Trump. FB and Twitter went on to ban Trump from their platform.
A judge would rather look for a legal loophole to throw out the case than risk the media wrath and big tech.

budaatum:
Dude, stop trying to rewrite your shameful history! You did promote stories of rigging which were Q nonsense. And dumps lawyer and you went tongs and hammer on Kraken but never dropped any evidence in any court.

Trump cases never got to discovery. There were thousands of affidavits filed but courts never listened to any witness. In all cases the courts were only looking for a loophole to throw out the cases. There is video evidence of ballots being counted twice by Ruby Freeman and her daughter that was available to the court for instance. There is video evidence of a van dropping ballots at 3 am.FBI refused to investigate ( why would they after all they are the DNC stasi)
A witness filing an affidavit is not Q . Q was way before the elections during the Mueller probe, I dont think I have ever quoted Q. Stop pushing your luck. I never mentioned Q as a source

This was my quote in August 2020 disowning Qanons. Long before the elecions
https://www.nairaland.com/4508641/american-politics-thread-joe-bidens/815#92660014

I dont believe in qanon theories. Im writing off that broad generalisation that all people of colour hate Trump and conservatives.
That is a Facebook group with real life stories of people who mostly quit the democrats after their commie , unapologetic descent. Most have lost family and relatives for speaking out and leaving the democrats.
Long before Obama anyone who won the presidency was Id say a political agreeable candidate to both parties and was generally allowed to perform his duties without manufactured bottlenecks being placed in his way.
Im sure had Clinton won , the republicans would have moved on , allowed her on without bothering 24/7 planning schemes to get rid of her.

Comes Trump, no favourite of any of the sides and his message sinks to the majority of the electoral college. He promised to end the DC corruption.
Instead of being allowed they gang up in a massive never unseen way to remove him, using plain lies backed by the media.
Some crooks I guess are sowing division of the right and left , knowing that they will go scot free for crimes uncovered.
They sit at the top there directing the war conducted by automatons . Some crimes I rhink are too big to be uncovered that these top shots will gladly destroy the society.
Any crisis is overblown, a simple spelling error like covfefe is broadcast non stop by all channels.

My point, some criminals have everything to lose if law and order is to prevail. They will do anything to make sure Trump is out.
And to serve as a warning to any other busybody not part of their elite class attempting to take over the reigns of power.
Propaganda fed to the ordinary person .
This is a war pitting the club vs non club members.

budaatum:
You promoted q and kraken here so much that you deserve to be browbeaten with it.

Criminals are only released on bail because their crime warrants bail. We do not live in a Minority Report world where crimes are detected before they are perpetrated.

I did promote stories of rigging which were proven later like the drop boxes being filled in . I have also said that I never believe in Q nonsense. Trumps lawyer was the one who was to drop the Kraken which the media went tongs and hammer on the matter .

After the covid pandemic still ongoing the left realised they can get away with anything knowing half the country hates republicans. We are seeing the fruits . Joe Biden spox says the economy has never been better and media 'proves' it. Today the left can say that the sea water is blue , the media repeats it and half the country believes it. Anyone who doubts that sea water is not blue is blacklisted by the social media propagandists. Its that absurd.
Today a lot of people live in an alternate world and have outsourced their thinking to the media.
On twitter Done with CNN is trending because Jack Tapper of CNN suggested that Biden invites Trump to Air force One for the Queens funeral. The comments there are simply flabbergasting. Many leftists switching to MSNBC which is even worse than CNN

budaatum:
Like any evidence provided would convince you, lol.

We've been proving it to you for years basilico, but your qanon paddled brain does not let you see past bamboo in the kraken.

You like using Q, Kraken to browbeat , that way you avoid answering

As for those thugs I dont know them but have youi not heard of cases where criminals were released on bail then immediately went on murder rampages? Or is that Q? I also think Illinois has a no cash bail law in their books.

budaatum:
If I were new here this your kraken might fly, but we thankfully state who nominated the judges hearing the numerous cases involving dump and the majority of them seem to be republican nominated and he still lost including all cases involving him that he got before the conservative majority Supreme Court.

Prove this

budaatum:
We see the junk you fill your mind with.

I posted a video I did not make it . Crime is everywhere. That is not junk those are real crimes captured on video.
Remeber some people walked into the capitol compound Did not even go in and are held in solitary for 1,5 years now Yet such thugs like in those videos are immediately given bail.
If course if you read WAPO you cannot see the injustice. As long as a Trump supporter is being prosecuted persecuted on trumped up charges you are OK

What became of humanity? Do you have a moral compass?

budaatum:
It would have been my line of thought if that someone had not tried to get his case before a judge he appointed but woefully failed as usual.

Since you cannot see the big picture the current AG Garland was slated to be the next nominee for the Supreme Court at the end of Obama's term but GOP had majority in senate.McConnel refused to go ahead with the vetting until after the elections which Trump won. Trump went ahead and appointed 3 judges .
After Joe Biden was seated he appointed Garland as the AG.
You expect Garland to be neutral to Republicans now that he runs the DOJ?

I dont know how judges are selected for each case but nearly all Trump related cases have been before Democrat appointed judges which is a surprising? coincidence. Maybe you can explain how cases are assigned to the judges.

The judge who approved the raid to Trump residence was appointed by Clinton. The judge who has ordered a Special Master to review the documents taken away from Trump is a Trump appointee - She determined that there were already leaks to the media. ( nuclear codes, Kim Jon Un etc) . the DOJ does not want a Special Master maybe so that the leaks can continue I suppose.

I do admit its not all places that are like this. I am sure these are white supremacists committing these crimes.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1566153239296413696

budaatum:
I bought this for you basilico,so you can see what we think of you and your master kraken.


The Washington Post: Analysis | Trump presented his Russia hoax theory to a court. It went poorly..
https://wapo.st/3eGbwAI

Clinton appoints a leftie Democrat donor judge, years later someone goes before the same judge to sue Clinton's wife.
That should be your line of thinking Not plastering stuff from WAPO as the truth.

budaatum:
I bought this for you basilico,so you can see what we think of you and your master kraken.


The Washington Post: Analysis | Trump presented his Russia hoax theory to a court. It went poorly..
https://wapo.st/3eGbwAI

WAPO is a rag trash OP meant to sway minds that are not inquisitive.If WAPO is a source neutral to you then you need to come out of that cocoon.

See these idiots in UK who bought into climate change about cow farts. You no different from them. Rag tag like WAPO have made them lose their minds.


More than 100 supporters of Animal Rebellion stopped the supply of fresh milk across large areas of England in the early hours of Sunday, including Arla Aylesbury, which processes 10% of the UK supply.
is calling for the government to support farmers and fishing communities to move away from animal farming and fishing as part of an immediate transition to a plant-based food system