₦airaland Forum

Obrigardo:
Exactly!

You get it now 100%. How he continues to live with that hate daily is shocking.

budaatum:
Basilico. None of them are correct there, and evidence has been presented to you numerous times to show you this, but the maga in you can not allow you to refuse dump's koolaid and face the truth, which is why sensible people here don't waste too much time on your kraken.

budaatum:
Maga Q Bamboo in Basilico's Kraken

feedthenation:
---None of the 3 Supreme Court Judges Trump appointed gave him any favourable ruling for his numerous election petitions---

budaatum:
Basilico! What in the above implies China's dominance?

Whom did China dominate?

does the above

feedthenation:
---Trump needs better legal team---

Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit against Clinton, DNC, officials involved in Russia probe

A federal judge dismissed former President Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and a number of other high-profile figures involved in creating the narrative that he and his 2016 presidential campaign were colluding with Russia.
This week, U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks threw out the lawsuit, saying that "most of" Trump’s claims were "unsupported by any legal authority" and said the lawsuit lacks "substance.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-dismisses-trump-lawsuit-against-clinton-dnc-officials-involved-in-russia-probe

budaatum:
Where did China have dominance a thousand years ago, bas?

benalvino3:
Nato is provocating we know, Ukraine should have played their game carefully. they have to fight for their will now. Nato is not taking arms with them as usual.

budaatum:
You keep digging deeper in the pit of stupidity.

Have you not heard that the oyinbo who made pencil made eraser? It stems from agreements Europeans signed with African chiefs to steal their African land. Some of those land acquisition agreements were blank pieces of paper that were filled in after the chiefs had thumprinted. The oyinbo just had to make them understand. Most Africans learn this simple pencil eraser relationship so the mistake is not repeated and we find ourselves back in chains.

Basilico, written agreements can be rewritten, so what makes you think an unwritten agreement is binding because it is "understood"?

And that's apart from the lack of written detail that you claim is "understood".

Forgive me. I have wasted enough time on you today and will be taking the advise below.

benalvino3:
The west and you Buda and your fellow Cronnies here are more like a dictator. you tend to want to silence dissenting words.

Accusing the west of provocation does not mean hate for the west.

As I said, if they are not willing to send their soldiers to fight and die, They should not be provocating. I will also tell Basilico that Russia does not have the right to dictate to any nation. If they want to Dictate, they will have to fight for it which they are doing. Ukraine too has to fight for the freedom to join Nato which they are doing.

But the West should not put fuel to the Situation by enticing Ukraine to Join them if they are not going to pick up weapons and actually help Ukraine Join them.

The proxy wars they are fighting is not enough

budaatum:
Since you seem to trust this source, perhaps you'd trust them on how sanctions are affecting Russia.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLyUeKa2jzY

Obrigardo:
You expect me to waste my time on you. When I give you links with reports, you'll say it's planted lol

You've seen the reports and you already know. So get lost

budaatum:
Which is why any agreement between Beijing and Washington can easily be ripped up if the need arises.

budaatum:
You speak as if I support the antagonisation of Russia, which I don't. Ukraine however, is a sovereign nation that elected a president which Russia did not like and deposed and installed their own person in Ukraine who then got voted out for a person whom the people wanted. If they then choose then to join NATO, that is their sovereign democratic right and choice which Russia has not legal right to oppose.

If the burglar is my neighbour, they must already rent or own property near to mine, so I'd be shutting the gate after the horse has bolted if I'm objecting after they become my neighbour. That said, if the landlord who owns the neighbouring property wants to rent it to my neighbour who is a burglar, I have no right opposing either of them. I can of course rent the house myself, paying more than my neighbour who is a burglar wants to rent it for to keep my neighbour who is a burglar out, but god help me if my neighbour who is a burglar offers much more because they are competent at their burglary profession or if the landlord of the neighbouring house is a member of the same gang as my neighbour who is a burglar, though you need to wonder what I be doing living in my property and renting the neighbouring property too.

budaatum:
Basilico! Written agreements are rewritten, so why would you expect an unwritten agreement to be cast in stone unless you are naive?

budaatum:
Basilico! Written agreements are rewritten, so why would you expect an unwritten agreement to be cast in stone unless you are naive?

budaatum:
Glad to see you at least disagree with basilico who thinks Russia should dictate to Ukraine and Europe.

saxywale2:
Steve Bannon is in custody. He is charged in NY with two counts of money laundering, three counts of conspiracy & one count of scheming to defraud.

budaatum:
It's called democracy, Bas. If people chose to not support Ukraine (Czech Republic springs to mind), the people can vote for leaders who oppose supporting Ukraine. Just that not everyone is self-centred like you are. Some will make sacrifices for the good of others,

budaatum:
I don't think you know what you are talking about, as usual. If you were Russian and you had to sell your football team and had your yacht and bank accounts impounded and can't play tennis or drive a Formula 1 car or travel where you used to etc, I'm sure you change your tune.

And China is not a bigger threat unless you believe you must remain the only superpower or if you ignore the economic quagmire China currently find itself in, which, when it comes to the fore, you'd be here gloating at what you'd call China's demise.

benalvino3:
We all believe what we want, don't we?

the sanctions to cripple Russia did not work. the fact they are calling for more sanctions shows the prior ones failed to deter Russia. Hopefully, they can get it right. Ukraine is in a stalemate with Russia. The US is bleeding billions every month and Russia is bleeding millions every month. at the end of the day, china which is a bigger threat is rising.

obixcel:
What haven't we seen for the past 4-6 yrs. They claim Trump was racist, they said he was a "foreign agent" in the White house - a Putin asset, they claimed He was an illegitimate President and stole the election via Collusion with Russia (Putin) etc I can go on and on - we all know the story.

The issue with the Russia-Ukraine War is that the Establishment Republicans and Democrats are milking it while they can, churning out Billions of Dollars and sending them to Ukraine. Of course they get huge kick backs, cash backs, call it whatever. They are enriching themselves while virtue signalling like they are doing some righteous thing or being on the right side of history in their support for Ukraine. The whole thing is deception.

obixcel:
Trump has never and will never start or give the war machines any war they'd love to get into. He promised "Peace through Strength", strengthened the military like never before. But he only used the American military strength as a deterrence to American enemies. When you add to the fact that even Putin couldn't read Trump cos of his unpredictable nature. Trump was able to keep America from needless war - the very first to do so despite Democrats' fear mongering that Trump would go to war. The opposite was the case.

The reason why they are afraid of Trump is the same reason they were afraid of him running for Office in 2016. That hasn't changed. It's because Trump is not like them - the typical Establishment Politicians (whether it's Dems. Or Republicans), Trump would refuse to be controlled by them, and he's not a globalist.

obixcel:
Nothing scares Democrats and the far left than seeing Trump return to the White House. It's every Dem's nightmare - what literally keeps them up at night That is why they weaponized the DOJ to go after Trump. The end game is just to create a cloud of uncertainty over Trump and live it hanging long enough over his head so that the American people will view or judge him as unelectable. The DOJ & FBI have been compromised from top to bottom.

One thing I know is that after they've all tried and done their worst against Trump, he will be vindicated in the end. I predict that before 2024 their last ditch attempt to stop Trump from running will be to assassinate him.

obixcel:
@Bolded That's the problem with you Trump haters. You always think you know what Trump is going to do the next minute, in the end you presume or assume he's committed a crime without any evidence to show for. Wasn't that how y'all assumed he colluded with Russia in the first place and started a probe over nothing only to discover that Dems and Hillary were the ones who were actually in collusion with Russia.
Trump is going to do this, Trump is going to do that You just know what he's going to do with "nuclear documents" whatever term the Mainstream Media calls it, that's were you feed

Obrigardo:
Are you this honest? Exactly what Kushner did with the $2bn Saudi loan and Mnuchin $1bn Saudi grant. Kushner that opened a back chanel communication with Russia. Kushner paid off his 666 building loan due to strong arming Qatar. When kushner held Qatar to the throat, it was clear. Then in no time he's covered up his loans.

What about ivanka who had patents for election machines that were made in China. Care to find out?

wirinet:
What's your problem with Joe? You accuse the FBI of not investigating Jim, Hunter and all other Bidens, but you are yet to specify Joe's crimes. The FBI can't be wasting time investigating personal and moral sins of citizens. They have to present their evidence and convince a jury of 12 people. If they cannot proof a crime beyond all reasonable doubt, it will be a waste of investigative and judicial time to bring flimsy evidence before a jury. That's why after two years of investigation by Republican led Senate and the FBI, the FBI was not confident enough to take Hilary Clinton before a judge and jury.

wirinet:
I will tolerate your obsession with Hunter Biden today.

First of all the law on drugs always applies to possession with intent to sell, transport and distribute and not to possession for use or consumption. Users are considered addicts by law and not criminals.

Secondly, in the video you posted, there is no evidence that Hunter Biden was smoking crack, cocaine or any of the other hard drugs. There was no way to ascertain the exact drug he was taking.

Thirdly, even if the FBI decicides foolishly to prosecute Hunter Biden, where is the physical evidence to present to a jury? A video from unknown source, location and time would not pass in a law court without any physical evidence.

wirinet:
Here

wirinet:
Is crack possession a criminal offense? What is termed a felony is drug possession for the purpose of sale, transportation or distribution and not for personal use.
Besides was crack ever found in Hunter Biden's possession? You expect the FBI to prosecute Joe Biden for his purposely stolen laptop showing a photo (or was it a video) showing him under the influence of drug in his personal space?

You guys even expect the FBI to investigate and prosecute Hunter Biden for sleeping with a hooker in his own bedroom or hotel.