Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 8:52am On Jan 05, 2012 |
sholatech: This is a completely wrong analogy.
Crude Oil is completely different from Solid Minerals in Nigeria.
Aside Iron ore mining you mentioned, all the other minerals have long been abandoned by the Federal Government.
The Nigerian mineral sector is completely dominated by the private sector, albeit informal and artisanal products and 99% of their output are exported. These minerals from Nigeria are used mostly by Industries in Asia and Europe. Not like your Crude oil that is JV operations btw FG and the multinationals. The FG only gives you license for exploring or mining and leaves you alone to undertake the huge risk in the business and everything you mine is yours to export, and you can see that the non-oil exports even contribute less than 3% to our GDP because FG has little impetus for the sector.
Crude oil products are consumption goods, but our mineral products are Production goods. All the mining sites you mentioned are completely private sector discovered and managed. if FG decides to subsidize those goods, it will be a laughing stock because everyone will start looking for where the subsidy is, because the owner/operator of those mines ships ALL his products to the end users ABROAD! We can talk so much on this long abandoned sector, but we will not deviate from the heat of the moment that Govt has not done much to warrant the removal of fuel subsidy at this time. There is no electricity nationwide and hence our small businesses and households rely on the use of petrol daily to run their generators and generate their own electricity. If the price doubles or triples, the multipier effect on the cost of living in Nigeria will astronomically increase. Please abandon those western macroeconomic policies and get lectured on Nigeria-Specific Behavioral Economics. Imagine if we all have electricity in our homes 24/7 as we had long been promised on those power supply projects and we are witnessing huge road expansion and repair projects nationwide and then our dear GEJ now asks for understanding on removing fuel subsidy, how many people will you see on the streets? The AGF mentioned how much Nigerians launder every year which far exceeds how much is used on subsidy yearly. Can't that be plugged? If it can't be plugged, then even the removal of fuel subsidies will only creare more money for contracts to be taken by our Politician Contractors giving them more money to launder abroad since our leaders are refusing to plug that hole! The bolded line is the most important one in your post. Can you point out a single country that isn't crackpot where consumption is subsidised? All serious countries aside from crazy ones like Saudi and Venezuela subsidise productive areas like Research and Development, manufacturing, education, agriculture etc. So your entire argument suffocates. Nobody subsidises for sentimental reasons as is being demanded in Nigeria. Elsewhere, subsidies are seen as economic investments. What gain is there in Nigeria borrowing money to subsidise trips out with a girlfriend etc? The FG is already a laughing stock for subsidising petrol for consumption. The same laws govern all our mineral resources, so I wonder why oil is singled out for subsidising, but not timber forests or any iron we get from Itakpe. No matter the angle it is viewed from, the fuel subsidy argument makes no sense. |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 8:33am On Jan 05, 2012 |
nku5: @Beaf - you be young man o. Dont get caught up in the web that these old demons have been spinning for us and their children (not our own). Dude, the subsidy was a very bad thing. It has taken goodwill and guts to remove it, we had been enslaved to a few hundred fatcats with a legal siphon into our collective wealth. |
Politics › Re: When Will There Be A Mass Protest Against Corruption? by Beaf: 8:29am On Jan 05, 2012 |
Nigerians are not protesting corruption, because most of the "revolutionary" hypocrites love corruption very dearly. I find the protests against the subsidy removal to be hairbrained and driven by ulterior motives.
People keep crying for revolution, but they have no philosophy backing their call. For the average person, the reason is sentimental, they do not wish to make any sacrifice. For the hypocritical leaders and sponsors, the reasons are political and ethnic; it is an unabashed looting grab for the center. Only a fool would get caught in that mix.
A protest against corruption is easy to philosophise and will gain everyones support. So why is there no such protest? Instead, folk are hitting the street with stories that make them seem lazy, confused, selfish and utterly lacking in their scale of priorities.
I am all for a protest against corruption. |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 8:10am On Jan 05, 2012 |
dustydee: Does the price of stone or wood affect the cost of food in the market? Yes, look outside at even the worst road. Does it have stones? You see why we must place a subsidy on stones? Its common sense, bruv and it makes the common man poorer if stones are not subsidised. Why should stones be different from oil, are they not a mineral resource? Have you read the constitution? My guy, let us RIOT!  |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 8:07am On Jan 05, 2012 |
nku5: Is this supposed to be a joke?
Does my car run on gold, does my generator run on gold, does the price of gold affect the cost of food and virtually eveything else. Abeg lets get serious enough of the clowning What about the road your car runs on. Is it made with stones? This is why we need a subsidy on stones. We must subsidise all mineral resources since they are all under the same laws. Why should one be different from the others? ALUTA! |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 7:45am On Jan 05, 2012 |
dustydee: Yes. As soon as every Nigerians start using Gold on a daily basis and as soon as it starts affecting the cost of food and transportation in Nigeria. Check your womans neck and her fingers, check your wristwatch. Isn't is time for REVOLUTION?  What about wood and stones, no subsidy? lol! |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 6:21am On Jan 05, 2012 |
Aigbofa: Do you need gold to get from point A to B? Wrong analogy! Besides, the imported refined oil does not belong to Niger delta. I need gold to make money which is much more important. I need stones and wood to build a home, surely that is very important. So, please let us start a REVOLUTION. |
Politics › Re: 6 Oil Marketers In Trouble For Funding Fuel Riots by Beaf: 6:17am On Jan 05, 2012 |
Ozin: I suspect this all along! My brother, as they say, "wen breeze blow, fowl. . ." [size=14pt]6 oil marketers in trouble for funding fuel riots[/size] • May be arrested soon , CBN, EFCC on the alert over panic withdrawal From Our reporter Thursday, January 05, 2012 More Stories on This Section The near-instant mobilization of protesters to demonstrate against the federal government’s New Year Day removal of subsidy on petrol has caught the attention of the nation’s security operatives as they seek to get to the bottom of the sudden explosion of violence across the country.
The security operatives are suspecting a fifth columnist may have got into the mix and taken advantage of the situation. They are, therefore, trailing the movement of funds to some organizers of the rallies, even as organized labour gets set for mass action from Monday. Daily Sun gathered yesterday that security operatives may have started probing six marketers for allegedly bankrolling the proposed nationwide protest.
Nothing less than N1 billion is believed to have already been doled out by the marketers to some protest organisers. To further underscore government’s seriousness on the matter, it was also authoritatively gathered that the marketers, many of whom figured in the controversial Senate subsidy cabal list, may be arrested for questioning any moment from now.
Consequent upon these findings, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) as well as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) have been placed on the alert to check curious withdrawals by some marketers to fund any nationwide protest. Investigation showed that the apex bank and the EFCC are monitoring commercial banks on curious withdrawals. However, a Deputy Governor with CBN who spoke on condition of annonimity said “if anybody is concocting huge withdrawals to finance a national strike, it will fail”. He further added: “I think we should all rally round the government to allow this deregulation to succeed. There will be initial pains but Nigerians will enjoy the benefits.”
According to findings by security agencies, the concerned marketers were alleged to be working in concert with some trade union leaders to make the country ungovernable. It was gathered that the security reports had indicted the affected marketers of budgeting over N1billion to frustrate the withdrawal of fuel subsidy. It was also learnt that the security agencies uncovered a secret meeting between the marketers and some Senators and members of the House of Representatives on how to compromise the National Assembly to reject the withdrawal of fuel subsidy by the Federal Government.
“We are probing some marketers for taking undue advantage of issues raised by Labour to cause mayhem nationwide… Security agencies have identified six of the marketers, who are the arrowheads of this covert plot to bring down the government.” A reliable source told a select group yesterday. According to the source, “the marketers have voted over N1billion to hijack the labour strike to make the nation ungovernable and some marketers will soon be invited for questioning. And whoever is involved might be tried accordingly.
“These marketers are unhappy because the removal of subsidy will put an end to cooking of records to get refund from government and diversion of subsidized imported to neighbouring African countries where they make triple profit. “They are also angry that it will no longer be business as usual. They are some of the beneficiaries of fuel subsidy. “Unfortunately, they have made labour leaders to believe that they are backing Nigerian workers for a just cause.” http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2012/jan/05/national-05-01-2012-003.html |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 6:15am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[size=14pt]6 oil marketers in trouble for funding fuel riots[/size] • May be arrested soon , CBN, EFCC on the alert over panic withdrawal From Our reporter Thursday, January 05, 2012 More Stories on This Section The near-instant mobilization of protesters to demonstrate against the federal government’s New Year Day removal of subsidy on petrol has caught the attention of the nation’s security operatives as they seek to get to the bottom of the sudden explosion of violence across the country.
The security operatives are suspecting a fifth columnist may have got into the mix and taken advantage of the situation. They are, therefore, trailing the movement of funds to some organizers of the rallies, even as organized labour gets set for mass action from Monday. Daily Sun gathered yesterday that security operatives may have started probing six marketers for allegedly bankrolling the proposed nationwide protest.
Nothing less than N1 billion is believed to have already been doled out by the marketers to some protest organisers. To further underscore government’s seriousness on the matter, it was also authoritatively gathered that the marketers, many of whom figured in the controversial Senate subsidy cabal list, may be arrested for questioning any moment from now.
Consequent upon these findings, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) as well as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) have been placed on the alert to check curious withdrawals by some marketers to fund any nationwide protest. Investigation showed that the apex bank and the EFCC are monitoring commercial banks on curious withdrawals. However, a Deputy Governor with CBN who spoke on condition of annonimity said “if anybody is concocting huge withdrawals to finance a national strike, it will fail”. He further added: “I think we should all rally round the government to allow this deregulation to succeed. There will be initial pains but Nigerians will enjoy the benefits.”
According to findings by security agencies, the concerned marketers were alleged to be working in concert with some trade union leaders to make the country ungovernable. It was gathered that the security reports had indicted the affected marketers of budgeting over N1billion to frustrate the withdrawal of fuel subsidy. It was also learnt that the security agencies uncovered a secret meeting between the marketers and some Senators and members of the House of Representatives on how to compromise the National Assembly to reject the withdrawal of fuel subsidy by the Federal Government.
“We are probing some marketers for taking undue advantage of issues raised by Labour to cause mayhem nationwide… Security agencies have identified six of the marketers, who are the arrowheads of this covert plot to bring down the government.” A reliable source told a select group yesterday. According to the source, “the marketers have voted over N1billion to hijack the labour strike to make the nation ungovernable and some marketers will soon be invited for questioning. And whoever is involved might be tried accordingly.
“These marketers are unhappy because the removal of subsidy will put an end to cooking of records to get refund from government and diversion of subsidized imported to neighbouring African countries where they make triple profit. “They are also angry that it will no longer be business as usual. They are some of the beneficiaries of fuel subsidy. “Unfortunately, they have made labour leaders to believe that they are backing Nigerian workers for a just cause.” http://www.sunnewsonline.com/webpages/news/national/2012/jan/05/national-05-01-2012-003.html |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 6:11am On Jan 05, 2012 |
^ Dude, you are misfiring. Nobody is trying to undo any reap off.
We are simply reacting to hypocrisy and the lies behind the attempted braindead civilian putsh. before that putsh, there were all sorts of threats driven by open bigotry from farcist and feudal political parties and politicians; it took various forms, from boko haram to all sorts of insults. The good thing is, its all in your face now, from a state of emergency to the removal of the subsidy; carry out your "revolution." In the end, there will be unmistakable winners and clear losers.
Nobody can say with a straight face that the intellectuals from all corners of the country do not know that the removal of the subsidy will be of immense benefit to Nigeria. Instead, they are being hypocritical and pretending to fight for the common man they have spent their whole lives burying.
Anybody that argues that the removal of the subsidy is bad to the extent that they want to overthrow a legitimate govt, is a bloody hypocrite. |
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 5:15am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[quote author=Negro_Ntns link=topic=839159.msg9897856#msg9897856 date=1325735885]leave gold alone and tell us what happened in your meeting with your boss. any hope of recovery?[/quote]In your case, govt needs to subsidise intelligence. You know how stup!d you are. |
Politics › Re: Is Anybody Still In Doubt That Beaf Is Reno Omokri (spokesman To The President) by Beaf: 5:13am On Jan 05, 2012 |
|
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 5:07am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[quote author=Ileke-IdI link=topic=838107.msg9897833#msg9897833 date=1325735129]Nothing, nothing at all. As long as you know who you're truly convincing.[/quote]I don't need to convince anyone. Our part of the country has born the brunt of all sorts of abuse from the the rest. All we get are threats and demeaning words; just a few days ago, a member of the Supreme Court made a public apology for his threats. Don't you think at some point we will be tired of being threatened and demeaned? That point passed long ago, but many have not noticed. Many have been making threats to wipe us out as soon as they can get GEJ; then this brainless "revolution" to topple GEJ pops up. How do you think we are gonna react, with smiles and thank you's? We have had pogroms, Asaba, Odi, Gbaramatu. We will have no more.  |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 4:40am On Jan 05, 2012 |
^ What is wrong with the perspective? Is there any state that is not basically useless and is there any that has the right to launch ethnically driven protests they pretend are for the removal of subsidies? I have opened a thread about subsidies on wood, stones and other mineral resources. Sadly, you have not seen the need to go there and scream for subsidies. I wonder why? https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-839159.0.htmlThere must be something to subsidise from each state, including yours. Please go to that thread and add it to the list. |
Politics › Re: Ogun Wades Into Yoruba/ Fulani Killings by Beaf: 4:23am On Jan 05, 2012 |
2mch: I thought SS and SE got this? Maybe SE and one state in SS. That is why history always remembers the SE. Your opinion is not the majority, so i am not going to go where you want to go. I have seen a lot of Igbo's step out and protest against the fuel subsidy. I watached on Channels TV a very brilliant lawyer of Igbo origin give a very good analysis of the situation so Mr. man you are on your own. You and Beaf are the only ones jumping up and down, where the SE is divided on the issue. Know this, no Yoruba will fall for your trap. Everyone should ignore this thread and focus on showing this government that we own Nigeria. Your king, Gbawe was in a deep quandry, struggling to untie his tongue, only to trample and tie it further after he uttered those same unfortunate bolded words. Regret always comes too late to the empty and brash. Nigeria has changed forever, but you will not notice it. |
Politics › Re: Is Anybody Still In Doubt That Beaf Is Reno Omokri (spokesman To The President) by Beaf: 4:12am On Jan 05, 2012 |
|
Politics › Re: There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 4:05am On Jan 05, 2012 |
Please, feel free to add any resource for subsidy, so that we can start the REVOLUTION!  |
Politics › There Is Gold In Iperindo (kwara), Anka (zamfara) Should Nigeria Subsidise Gold? by Beaf(op): 3:58am On Jan 05, 2012 |
Most people would think it is a stup!d idea to subsidise gold. I wonder why? But since all minerals supposedly belong to the FG, the same rules should apply. Lets go further, the is iron ore at Itakpe (Kogi). We must subsidise iron!  There is uranium in Cross River, Adamawa, Taraba, Plateau, Bauchi, and Kano. Somebody, please give a grunt to subsidise uranium in Nigeria!!!  There is heavy timber in Ondo state. Overthrow GEJ if he doesn't subsidise wood! Bloody hell!!  There is granite Nasarawa state. Burn Abuja if the FG doesn't subsidise stones! Gademit!!  As we journey through farce, we begin to discover the hypocrisy and comedy that is Nigeria. Sombori, please throw more farce on the table, its hilarious! Let us start the REVOLUTION!  |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 1:23am On Jan 05, 2012 |
^ You are intensely stup!d if you can equate the suggestion below to fertilizer subsidies: Beaf: By the way, I am not against proper subsidies. Subsidies are a brilliant thing if they are used to kickstart productivity in an economy; I will back subsidies on agriculture, Research and Development, education, health, manufacturing, local content etc. No wonder I ignored your rant. Dude, you must have a plug of shiit in your head instead of a brain. You are not worth answering and I really hope you are only pretending to be so stup!d. |
Politics › Re: Quit Threat To Christians: Acf, Afenifere, Opc, N/d Group, Nirec, Others React by Beaf: 1:16am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[quote author=alj_harem link=topic=838285.msg9897433#msg9897433 date=1325722312]clown
what is a revolution ?
A forcible overthrow of a government or social order for a new system
So is it a grammatical blunder or what ?
Is that not why Arewa has been begging Jonathan to arrest the situation in the NE before such occur ?
Do you think we don't know what Boko haram is ?[/quote]You are a fool and a very despicable person. Is boko haram overthrowing the system or blowing innocent women, children and babies to shreds? You think their blood is a revolution?
You are a fool and a very hateful thing. Why don't you go and officially join boko haram, afterall, they are your people? Phucking cretin. |
|
Politics › Re: Quit Threat To Christians: Acf, Afenifere, Opc, N/d Group, Nirec, Others React by Beaf: 1:08am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[quote author=alj_harem link=topic=838285.msg9897406#msg9897406 date=1325721813]LOL what an ideeiot. really you have no brain at all
please where is PDP
Where is APGA
PPA
CPC
ANPP etc why are you talking of ACN. do you have sense at all ?[/quote]Have any of those parties id!otically claimed that boko haram is a revolution?
Cow. |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 1:05am On Jan 05, 2012 |
^ What in the list of your daft utterances, are you referring to? |
Politics › Re: Quit Threat To Christians: Acf, Afenifere, Opc, N/d Group, Nirec, Others React by Beaf: 1:01am On Jan 05, 2012 |
[quote author=alj_harem link=topic=838285.msg9897394#msg9897394 date=1325721543]How can a sane human being like your self i hope relate A POLITICAL PARTY TO AN GEOETHNIC ORGANISATIONI mean ACN to ACF, AFENIFERE, OPC, NIGER-DELTA GROUP ETC How do you think ?[/quote]You have always proven yourself to be a fool over and over. This is from the same article: ARP tasks N-Assembly
African Renaissance Party, ARP, yesterday, urged the National Assembly to reconvene as a matter of national urgency, to help tackle the Boko Haram threats.
Mr Udoka Udeogaranya, Lagos State chairman of ARP in a statement, said there was need for the lawmakers to enact a law that would punish perpetrators and ensure that everyone joins hands to end the menace.
The party said: “It is our opinion that the ultimatum by the sect, amid a rising tide of violence, gives a profound recognition that punitive measures are needed. Now, if you do not know why ACN has not responded or why Bisi Akande thinks that boko haram is a revolution, then it is best for you to shut up. |
Politics › Re: Quit Threat To Christians: Acf, Afenifere, Opc, N/d Group, Nirec, Others React by Beaf: 12:56am On Jan 05, 2012 |
I am not surprised that ACN did not bother to react. They have always been negatively vocal about boko haram, anyway. Bisi Akande even called it a "revolution." |
Politics › Re: Reps Make U-turn On Subsidy Removal by Beaf(op): 12:41am On Jan 05, 2012 |
^ You sound quite stup!d. But aren't you the guy that created a thread to abuse Seun, cos your thread kept sinking down the list? You even accused Seun of taking bribes, because nobody was interested in replying your threads!!! https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-838018.32.html#msg9890019Dude, your unparalleled stup!dity must be a problem to your entire community. |
Politics › Re: Reps Make U-turn On Subsidy Removal by Beaf(op): 11:08pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
jmaine: They call for salary and allowance cuts is staring them at the face . . .they would tread with caution . . . . .The subsidy removal gameplay should see both the Legislative and the executive antagonize each other in their excessive budgeting . . .
The gameplay should be to protest wastage in all cadres of government in Nigeria . . I support the bolded. |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 11:06pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
blacksta: Beaf what is your thought on the 1600 buses. Is that not subsidy? Will people pay to get on them? The answer lies there, sir. By the way, I am not against proper subsidies. Subsidies are a brilliant thing if they are used to kickstart productivity in an economy; I will back subsidies on agriculture, Research and Development, education, health, manufacturing, local content etc. |
Politics › Re: Reps Make U-turn On Subsidy Removal by Beaf(op): 11:02pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
I expect NLC to join the smart U-turn bandwagon over the weekend. |
Politics › Re: Nairalanders, Are You Fighting? by Beaf: 10:59pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
|
Politics › Reps Make U-turn On Subsidy Removal by Beaf(op): 10:57pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
[size=14pt]Reps make U-turn on subsidy removal[/size] January 4, 2012 by John Ameh, Abuja Three days after the Federal Government removed the subsidy on petrol, the House of Representatives adjusted its stance on the issue, claiming it had not taken a definite position on the issue. In a fresh statement it issued in Abuja on Tuesday, the House said its position on the controversial policy would be guided by the majority opinions of members. Members are currently observing the Christmas and New Year break and will reconvene on Tuesday, January 10. The Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Victor Ogene, signed Tuesday’s statement. It read in part, “The House of Representatives has not taken any definite decision on the subsidy matter before it proceeded on recess on December 20, 2011. “However, the House of Representatives would immediately upon resumption on Tuesday, January 10, 2012, commence exhaustive deliberation and consultation with other stakeholders on the issue, and wishes to assure all Nigerians that as the elected representatives of the people, the outcome will be reflective of the views of majority of members.” The latest statement was contrary to the earlier position the House took on December 1 when it considered and approved a report on the medium Term Expenditure Framework and Fiscal Strategy Paper on the 2012 budget. The report, a product of the House Joint Committee on Appropriation, Finance and Legislative Budget, opposed the removal of subsidy on petroleum products. Members in plenary, endorsed the report, describing any move by the Executive to remove subsidy as “premature.” The House also kicked against the proposal of the President to use proceeds from subsidy removal to fund the deficit in the 2012 budget. Part of the report adopted on December 1, reads, “The proposal on fuel subsidy removal, as contained in the revised Fiscal Strategy Paper, is premature. “Sources other than relying on savings from proposed subsidy removal as part of financing items for expected deficit (of 2012 budget) should be explored.” Besides, the Chairman of the Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Zakari Mohammed, had consistently told Nigerians that the House was against the removal of subsidy on fuel. Only last week, Mohammed had insisted that there was no going back on the opposition to the removal of subsidy. “We are the representatives of the people; on this issue of subsidy. We are on the same page with the people of Nigeria,” he had said. “If they support the removal of subsidy, we will support it, but so far, the opinion of the people is that they do not want subsidy to be removed. “The House does not take a position that will add to the pains Nigerians are already facing,” he had said. But, on Tuesday, his deputy, Ogene, said that the House had not taken a decision on subsidy. Mohammed is currently out of the country. Only on Monday, opposition lawmakers had vowed to do everything within their powers to stop Jonathan. The Deputy Minority Leader, Suleiman Kawu, had called the removal of subsidy another form of terrorism against Nigerians. He threatened that the House would use “the law” to stop Jonathan but did not give details. http://www.punchng.com/news/reps-make-u-turn-on-subsidy-removal/ |
Politics › Re: Why Are There No Subsidy Protests In The SE/SS Oil Producing States? by Beaf(op): 10:56pm On Jan 04, 2012 |
Normal service resumes. . . [size=14pt]Reps make U-turn on subsidy removal[/size] January 4, 2012 by John Ameh, Abuja
Three days after the Federal Government removed the subsidy on petrol, the House of Representatives adjusted its stance on the issue, claiming it had not taken a definite position on the issue. In a fresh statement it issued in Abuja on Tuesday, the House said its position on the controversial policy would be guided by the majority opinions of members. Members are currently observing the Christmas and New Year break and will reconvene on Tuesday, January 10. The Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Victor Ogene, signed Tuesday’s statement. It read in part, “The House of Representatives has not taken any definite decision on the subsidy matter before it proceeded on recess on December 20, 2011. “However, the House of Representatives would immediately upon resumption on Tuesday, January 10, 2012, commence exhaustive deliberation and consultation with other stakeholders on the issue, and wishes to assure all Nigerians that as the elected representatives of the people, the outcome will be reflective of the views of majority of members.” The latest statement was contrary to the earlier position the House took on December 1 when it considered and approved a report on the medium Term Expenditure Framework and Fiscal Strategy Paper on the 2012 budget. The report, a product of the House Joint Committee on Appropriation, Finance and Legislative Budget, opposed the removal of subsidy on petroleum products. Members in plenary, endorsed the report, describing any move by the Executive to remove subsidy as “premature.” The House also kicked against the proposal of the President to use proceeds from subsidy removal to fund the deficit in the 2012 budget. Part of the report adopted on December 1, reads, “The proposal on fuel subsidy removal, as contained in the revised Fiscal Strategy Paper, is premature. “Sources other than relying on savings from proposed subsidy removal as part of financing items for expected deficit (of 2012 budget) should be explored.” Besides, the Chairman of the Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Zakari Mohammed, had consistently told Nigerians that the House was against the removal of subsidy on fuel. Only last week, Mohammed had insisted that there was no going back on the opposition to the removal of subsidy. “We are the representatives of the people; on this issue of subsidy. We are on the same page with the people of Nigeria,” he had said. “If they support the removal of subsidy, we will support it, but so far, the opinion of the people is that they do not want subsidy to be removed. “The House does not take a position that will add to the pains Nigerians are already facing,” he had said. But, on Tuesday, his deputy, Ogene, said that the House had not taken a decision on subsidy. Mohammed is currently out of the country. Only on Monday, opposition lawmakers had vowed to do everything within their powers to stop Jonathan. The Deputy Minority Leader, Suleiman Kawu, had called the removal of subsidy another form of terrorism against Nigerians. He threatened that the House would use “the law” to stop Jonathan but did not give details. http://www.punchng.com/news/reps-make-u-turn-on-subsidy-removal/ |