BREAKING: A judge in Arizona just ruled that the Democrat Secretary of State MUST immediately release the list of nearly 100,000 voters who officials marked as U.S. citizens when they hadn't even provided documentary proof
Judge Scott Blaney also awarded attorneys' fees to the election integrity patriots for their trouble.
"THE COURT FINDS specifically that the Secretary has not established by a preponderance of the evidence that production of the records would violate rights of privacy or confidentiality or would be detrimental to the best interests of the state."
Judge Blaney also required them to do this by noon on Monday, the eve of the election. HE'S NOT PLAYING. The state failed to do its job in verifying the citizenship status of well over 200k voters in total, which is the new number they gave us, so he's allowing patriots to do the government's job for them. - George
raumdeuter: Who did they endorse in 2016? Has the Economist ever endorsed a Republican in the last 30yrs? And what's the importance of a UK based paper endorsement on US elections
Allow the idiot to be an idiot. Some of the nonsense he posts on this thread
IjeBos: One thing that surprises, well not really, is the inability of Harris and Biden to talk about how good the Economy is. They have let this doom and gloom propaganda set in while this is probably one of the best economies in the last 50 years.
IjeBos: He said Virginia law does not apply when the Supreme Court upheld the Virginia Law over the Federal Law (NVRA). Exactly, what I am talking about. Zero idea what you are talking about, just spreading misinformation right and left for the benefit of a paycheck.
Please STFU.
You are crazy. Only us citizens can vote... No other law applies in that decision NVRA, Virginia law, your law etc. Federal law says only citizens can vote in a federal election.
Supreme c. made their decision, stop crying
1600 non citizens removed, 3 that are citizens were affected and they can still vote by reregistering. Why is this even heading to the Supreme Court? The right thing to do is to remove any non citizen that registered to vote and also arrest them.
It's stunning that, just 11 days before the presidential election, a federal judge is ordering Virginia to reinstate individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens on the voter rolls. Virginia is prepared to take this to the U.S. Supreme Court if needed!
Youngkin
It's stunning that, just 11 days before the presidential election, a federal judge is ordering Virginia to reinstate individuals who have self-identified as noncitizens on the voter rolls. Virginia is prepared to take this to the U.S. Supreme Court if needed! pic.twitter.com/fyjlWBUlnQ
IjeBos: Because your deep understanding of either the NVRA, the Constitution or Virginia law informs your opinion? Of course not. So, STFU, you dumb, lying, propagandizing sack of shit
You don't have a job outside the money you collect for being a paid troll here. So, of course you'll be here again for 24 hours posting misinformation and disinformation.
This idiot wants illegal migrants to vote. you don't know the constitution more than the SC. If you are not a citizen of the US you cannot vote. that is a federal law. the Virginia law does not apply.
trolling is a good profession and it pays well. I hope you are recording the time i have spent today.
IjeBos: Don't you get tired of these lies? There were American Citizens whose voters registrations were purged due to this purge. The post you quoted even talks of one. I would say, if you only had read the story, you'd know. But, I'm sure you did read it and it's just part of your job requirements to lie.
The NVRA (National Voter Registration Act) law is clear. There can not be any work done on voter rolls 90 days before an election. The reason is because Voting should be sacrosanct and there wouldn't be enough time to fix any errors if a person legally eligible to vote was kicked off. The Supreme Court knew the law that Congress wrote and overrode it. That is not their job. They have moved from interpreting law to outright deciding which laws they want to follow and which laws they don't.
As I said, you are a functional illiterate who posts propaganda for living. You don't have a fundamental understanding of US government to be able to speak on its workings. You aren't even American nor have ever been to the US, despite all your lying. Afterall you think there are many branches of government (There are just 3).
Yesterday, you were on here for 24 hours from 12am Nigerian time to 12 am Nigerian time the next day with 37 posts just in this topic. The crazy part is that you don't live in the US, have never been to the US and have no discernable connection to the US. But you spend day and night here spreading lies and your "misspokes". Can you imagine what it takes to wake up at the crack of dawn everyday to write lie after lie about a country you have 0 connection to? It would be insanity, unless it was your job. So the question is, is the troll farm paying you double time this election season?
Dude keep quiet. The decision only prevents noncitizens from voting. if they have problems with their registration they should go and fix it. blaming the decision that bars noncitizens from voting on this is nonsense.
So 60days before an election, a lot of illegals are allowed to register. Nonsense
Today, i planned to spend more time here and you better get your excel spreadsheet ready
Well, she tried to remove Trump from the Ballot now she leaked the passwords of voting machines. it is a shame partisan hacks are in control of elections in this country.
LordReed: Ok so where is the action by the Texas Medical Board?
where is the action of the husband? why didn't he sue? this would have been a scandal then and lawyers would have approached him to represent him and only get paid if they win.
thats why the story is a lie. happened in 2021 Democrats are running on abortion resurrect this just before the election to rile people up.
the story is fake. Even on Twitter, Medical doctors are calling BS on this.
LordReed: Who would they face lawsuit from? The state is not going to sue them, they didn’t break any laws. The husband can't sue them since they didn't break any laws. So tell me who will sue them.
they broke the law by not giving her life-saving care. do you think it is Nigeria where they won't do anything if you don't pay?
Legal Obligation: Texas, like other states, has laws and medical board regulations requiring doctors to provide necessary emergency care. Federal law, specifically the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), mandates that emergency departments provide stabilizing treatment to all patients, regardless of the ability to pay or other factors.
Medical Board and Licensure: Doctors who refuse life-saving care without justified reason risk disciplinary action from the Texas Medical Board. Depending on the case, consequences may include fines, suspension, or even loss of their medical license.
Malpractice and Civil Liability: Families of patients who experience harm or death due to a refusal of care might sue for malpractice, claiming negligence. In life-or-death cases, if a court finds a doctor’s actions unjustified, they could be held liable for damages.
Conscience Protections and Exceptions: Texas law provides certain conscience protections for healthcare providers, allowing them to opt out of specific treatments they morally oppose (such as abortion or gender-affirming care). However, these protections typically do not apply to life-saving treatments in emergency scenarios.
LordReed: An exception that they refused to do the abortion for? Most likely because they were afraid of a lawsuit from the state. In her case they should have sped up the miscarriage instead of waiting but they didn't.
How will they be afraid of a lawsuit from the state when they are saving the life of the woman? The lawsuit they should be afraid of is not doing their duty to save the life of the woman. You want the story to be true so bad. The fact is the doctors are not facing any penalties for not saving the woman's life. The husband did nothing to penalize them, and this story is coming out just before the election. It is a lie because it is hearsay just like the lie that Trump says he doesn't cost that much to bury a fucking Mexican.
Just like the lie that Trump wanted Hitler's generals. The law permits them to save the woman's life, and if they don't, they will face the penalties.
IjeBos: The Supreme Court is making up laws and rewriting laws and precedent on a case by case now. This ruling broke all precedent.
Imagine if the word "votes" were changed with "guns" in this ruling. Imagine a situation where a State purged the registration of legal gun holders because they thought that there may be some illegal gun holders in that bunch. Do you think anybody on the right would be ok with this ruling?
Why is there a greater right to own a gun than there is to vote in the US. Breathtaking ruling by this Run Away Supreme Court.
Lies
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that Virginia can remove illegal aliens from their voter rolls.
This is a reminder:
If you ARE NOT a United States citizen..
Then you SHOULD NOT be voting in United States elections.
Trump in his garbage truck and his garbage collector outfit doing a rally. Vivek is working as a garbage collector today. This campaign is funny as hell
LordReed: How is that a lie when you cannot do an abortion in Texas? This wasn't an ectopic pregnancy, the fetus had a heartbeat for crying out loud.
are you crazy? despite the exception I posted you still revert. there is an exception and i have stated the exception here but you want to ignore it and maintain you cannot do an abortion in Texas.
armyofone: Grandpa called US a garbage can - What do ya say ?
He said we are like a Garbage can for the rest of the world. He is not calling the US or You a garbage can. He was saying that in the context of illegal migrants crossing the borders and how some countries are even sending their criminals over.
LordReed: They had to wait for the fetus to die within her, can you even hear yourself? An abortion would have saved this woman's life, I guess you aren't pro the life of the mother.
No... that is the hearsay and I don't believe that. maybe her husband is making crap up because he could sue the hospital or the doctors may go to jail but we don't have such cases. so if you know the follow-up or what happened to the doctors let me know.
i don't believe the story. it is designed to manipulate people
Releasing a story like this on an incident that happened in 2021 weeks before people go and vote while democrats are using abortion as a weapon in places like Texas smells fishy.
They have to wait for the heartbeat to stop gossip. She told her husband who told ProPublica. - hearsay
But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”
the last story about a girl who took an abortion pill was riddled with lies and half-truths.
so this is more about manipulating people to vote based on abortion rather than the woman's life.
see what the Texas law says
abortion law clearly states that an abortion is only legally permissible if it is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman or to prevent serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function. This decision must be made by a physician, not a court.
IjeBos: Instead of wasting your life on this thread pushing propaganda, pushing your uninformed take of all things America and pretending you're in the US, why don't you pick up the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence and read them so you won't always sound like the stupid inbred you are.
You are 50 years old, no kids and still talk about ex girlfriends. You are a waste of life 😂
You also take photos of your coke and chips when you manage to dine at a restaurant.
happney65: Trump campaign sues Bucks County, Pennsylvania, alleging it is "turning away our voters."
Dude is already preparing the Ground for claims of election fraud where there is none. Awon werey
But it's a documented fact
Every vote should count. Those who were there before 4:30 should vote.
WHY DO YOU THINK BUCKS COUNTRY SHUT DOWN VOTING AT 1:45 INSTEAD OF ALLOWING CITIZENS TO VOTE UNTIL 4:30 P.M.? ANY IDEA?
Bucks County is a county in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is shutting down at 1:45 P.M and was supposed to stay open untIl 4:30 P.M. pic.twitter.com/FjSCgHcgHE
LordReed: Dumdum why wasn't your first response she's a shadow senator? Because you wanted to be a dishonesty rat that's why.
The first response was not clear to you even as it says Puerto Rico not US. The second one clarifies the type of senate position she was elected to hold (shadow senator) yet you did not stop, you bait switch and now you have gone a full circle back to the first post saying Wy didn't you say this in the first place.
I'd say to you, take note of other information provided. Think out of the box