budaatum: They were not practicing the accepted form of Christianity that was prevalent in Europe at the time and were persecuted by the majority because of it, same as some now want to persecute those who don't practise the 'Christianity' some think is orthodox now.
Besides, the Christianity that was practised in the dawn of America where you claim the "population was still flourishing", was at the cost of some human beings who were kept in chains and worked for a whip, and some of us don't think that whipped portion of the population were flourishing, and nor were those who were met in America flourishing after europeans arrived and colonised the land.
As for your "all over the place", thank you for noticing I am not narrow minded like some. If you read some history instead of useless senseless youtube videos, your mind will broaden too.
when someone says you are all over the place, they are not saying nice things about you.
The YouTube videos you call senseless are reality and yes, it does not make sense what society is turning into. the leftists are cheering for Iran and nations that want to conquer them while they shout anti-colonialism. this is why more Iranians support Israel. they know what they are seeing. Lebanon was like Iran before Islam took over. Christianity and atheist begin to vanish.
Pakistan, recently a tourist was killed for alleged blasphemy. what do you do? you attack people who are worried about the future based on what they are seeing today.
budaatum: They were not practicing the accepted form of Christianity that was prevalent in Europe at the time and were persecuted by the majority because of it, same as some now want to persecute those who don't practise the 'Christianity' some think is orthodox now.
Besides, the Christianity that was practised in the dawn of America where you claim the "population was still flourishing", was at the cost of some human beings who were kept in chains and worked for a whip, and some of us don't think that whipped portion of the population were flourishing, and nor were those who were met in America flourishing after europeans arrived and colonised the land.
As for your "all over the place", thank you for noticing I am not narrow minded like some. If you read some history instead of useless senseless youtube videos, your mind will broaden too.
wow, yes, the same Christianity fought for their freedom. but lets put in on white Christians.... let's ignore the fact that those slaves that made it to the US were the lucky ones.
budaatum: No there wasn't! Go read some history please.
Europeans ran from Europe to go colonise America in order to escape the tyranny of uniformity of religion in Europe at the time. And some now seem to want to impose the same tyranny their forebears ran away from.
what are they running from today? Sometimes when you try to talk history, you seem to be all over the place like the one you did with Palestine. a lot of bad has been done because of religion (Christianity) in the post you responded to, I made it clear that
When most embraced the imaginary God, there was decency, and despite wars and conquest, the population flourished. Today, we see how irreligious Europe is dying a slow death.
the people who fled were still Christians, they were not atheists. So with all the atrocities and deaths happening because of wars etc. The population was still flourishing. Today, no war but the West is dying.
Anyone who comes to Europe must obey the law, which is what dictates values, and not some imaginary God that most have abandoned. We have elections, but you wouldn't hear anyone campaigning and mention God because it does not sell here anymore. We've evolved past that stage a long time ago.
Some of us fear very much that dump is being used to turn America into a Christian state. And to many, that is no different to Iran.
Allahu Snackbar is selling. When most embrace the imaginary God, there was desency, despite wars and conquest, population flourish. Today, we see how irreligious Europe is dying a slow death.
You say they must follow the law of the land? If they do why is France, German, Swedish citizens standing up against certain people that are not following their values and rules?
He knows the danger that looms ahead but I am surprised you always choose stuff that destroys. as I said, Iran was a country of freedom and the lady I spoke with yesterday says she will not want to visit Iran for anything, she even supports Israel over her government and she is happy when a Muslim country falls. she was happy for Libya, Iraq, and Syria. I told her Libya was a bad idea.
they keep saying you are getting replaced and he is not lying, he is saying the truth but I wonder how you don't get it.
PDPGuy: That would work if Harris has officially changed her primary state of residence from CA to another place. Otherwise, Newsom can’t be her running mate because the constitution prohibits both nominees on a presidential ticket from being from the same state.
lol budaatum, your favorite American boy does not know that two people from the same state cannot be president and vice president
budaatum: That guy was being an obnoxious asshole!
yeah, because Americans have lost their plot. No one respects them. Today I was talking to a Persian lady. She said she was dancing when their president died in a plane crash. she talked about How they are being forced to cover their hair and she is an atheist.
She said the majority of Iranians are being forced against their will by Islam. sadly, many countries in Europe are shaping their fate with mass migration of people who do not share their values or accept their values.
raumdeuter: I am not a Democrat but the worst thing they can do at this point is replace Biden. It will simply start a civil war in the DNC
Many people dont want Kamala as the head of the ticket, Then how do you explain importing another possibly white guy to jump over a woman when you spent the past5yrs telling everyone Kamala is capable of ruling
At that point Kamala will probably revert back to her attacks on Biden being a racist that supported bussing
ijebosb: What was the most epic part of this video to you? Was it when the white guy called the Black Soldier who was minding his business, just trying to hang with his friends during his downtime, a "Nigger"? Or the part where the white guy said they should keep Poland white? Or was it when the other white soldier had to console the black soldier because he had to keep walking because he's a US soldier, while the white guy followed him and kept calling him a nigger? Tell me again how fuking epic that was.
This encapsulates my point with most of the Trump Supporters in this thread. You are self hating black people too stupid to know what you are supporting hates you!
Epic ke?
Whether you like it or not that guy was displaying the perception of the United states. Biden is turning everything gay.
raumdeuter: REP. BYRON DONALDS: We have lost seven United States embassies under [Biden's] presidency. We have embassies all over the world in every country. That is essentially sovereign American soil. Under his watch, we have had to evacuate seven United States embassies. That has never happened in American history. Never. That's how weak we are on the world stage. That's how bad it is.
...
When you are weak, and our adversaries know you are weak, they push you. It is no different than a bully in the schoolyard. If you're timid, and a bully knows he can get away with it, what happens? He comes for your lunch money every day. Until you punch back.
We have been weak under Joe Biden, and so our adversaries around the globe, big and small, know that they can push us.
REP. WESLEY HUNT: When we were negotiating with the Taliban, when President Trump was still the president, President Trump wanted to get out of Afghanistan, but he wanted a conditions-based withdrawal, meaning you do what we tell; you to do and we will start pulling troops back slowly, as long as you abide by our rules.
President Trump and Mike Pompeo were talking to Taliban leadership in the room, and they had one translator. President Trump looked at the Taliban leader and said this, "I want to leave Afghanistan, but it is going to be a conditions-based withdrawal." And the translator translated. And he said, "If you harm a hair on a single American, I'm going to kill you."
And the translator goes [whoa]. And Trump goes, "Tell him what I said."
He reached into his pocket, pulled out a satellite photo of the leader of the Taliban's home, and handed it to him, got up, and walked outta the room.
Do you know, for 18 months, not a single American was killed in Afghanistan? That's the definition of strength. That's what I'm talking about. And so, you can imagine that kind of sentiment around the world
If we have an embassy in another country, no one's gonna touch it because they are going to be fearful that they will get a MOAB on their head. That's how President Trump rolls.
This is the opposite of strength, this is the definition of weakness. And so now, we're being feasted upon by other countries when our embassies are there because the Americans aren't gonna do anything about it, and they don't want us there anyway. But the point of us having an embassy there, and the point of us having sovereign American soil is to be able to keep an eye on the world. To have that presence. But you can't have that presence when you have feckless leadership.
🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Rep. Wesley Hunt went on the Sage Steele show and told his favorite Donald Trump story of when Trump met with Taliban leaders.
Trump told the Taliban “if you harm a hair on a single American, I’m going to kill you.”
ijebosb: I thought more about this post. What type of person does this. There are people who spend their time in the US Visa thread, giving their wisdom just to help people save money and get US Visas out of the goodness of their hearts. You are calling them liars and spreading misinformation that may affect someone who is genuinely just trying to get a US Visa, all so you can perpetuate some lie that you are in the US.
You're a trash person doing trash things.
Lmao, where did I call them liars? Me stating two different people may go through different hell applying for the same thing is me calling them liar? Can your brain process info?
OKAY, ijebosb, tell me, what are the document requirements for nonimmigrant visa?
ijebosb: Imagine this week alone I've made both of you look like idiots. Bemeruca lying about needing a police report to apply for a nonimmigrant visa. Raumdeuter lying/being wrong about motive being necessary to adjudicate if a actions is official based on this ruling.
Continue on with your "IjeBos made me look like a fool" party, so I'm going to continue writing posts about gibberish. People like you two are why this thread is trash. No real information/good discussion, just grown juveniles who have more time than sense/smarts.
You posted a discussion on Nairaland about someone applying for a visitor VISA So because of that the Consulate officer does not give anyone 221g document which sometimes asks applicants for a specific document to back up their application? Again, why do they provide types of documents they don't need on the page, and how to get them?
Is a paystub a requirement? No... but if you say you have been working for X and Y they will ask for a pay stub. How do you not understand this? No 100 applications have the same stress level and process. Some people don't even get their documents checked at the interview, Only their passport, Some officers will put you through Hell. you are at his or her discretion. they can ask you to provide any documents to back up your claim.
you have been the one praising yourself here NO, YOU HAVE NOT EARNED ANY RESPECT HERE, YOU ONLY LOSE THE LITTLE YOU HAD.
raumdeuter: Add that Biden said he was going to select a Black Woman and picked her. How did she know she met the criteria for a woman to accept the job or she was a biologist at that point?
It's a shame. Dems want Biden out, and if they believe the gaslighting they are doing, they should ask Biden to take out Trump or LOCK HIM UP BY FORCE before he leaves and all he has to say is he has immunity. Even if she should not be able to do that, his immunity should let him do it by force and still get away with it.
raumdeuter: Out of 9, 6 agree, 3 disagree. You with zero knowledge of your right from the left sits in your basement and argue 6 Supreme court judges are wrong without any form of legal education or any education at all
I wouldn't trust the judgment of someone who says She is not a biologist so she cannot define what a woman is. I can state Newton's laws of Motion and I am not a physicist. All I have to do is to read a physics book.
Budatuum - Has never lived in the US, has never studied US Government nor opened up a constitutional law book. Basilico - Has never lived in the US, has never studied US Government nor opened up a constitutional law book. Bemeruca - Has never lived in the US, has never studied US Government nor opened up a constitutional law book.
Yes, very wise informed people about the US Constitution. Budatuum up until yesterday evening didn't really understand impeachment and still doesn't understand the immunity this ruling grants. Somehow thinks that even if something is an official act, Congress can still have the Justice dept. indict and convict the President after impeachment despite this ruling.
Yet the person you are responding to still does not agree with you. So living in the US is not a factor even as thats the case for me.
Budaatum already told you some people who live in the US, born and raised there has little knowledge about their country. You can go to YouTube and see for yourself. I can bet you AOC cannot name 15 states in the United States.
ijebosb: Your understanding of act is limited in terms of the legal sense. You are given immunity for all consequences surrounding your official act. It's a broad immunity or else it wouldn't be immunity. Similar to the immunity Congresspeople have in Congress. A Congressperson can literally read a classified document on the House floor that has nothing to do with any bill being proposed and there would be nothing the government could do as the Speech and Debate clause is that broad.
You are arguing the concept of immunity. Do a study on the concept and you'll understand where you are going astray and the purpose.
It is not an official act to kill your wife even if you send the DOJ to do it or you do it in the white house.
Why are you still arguing?
The immunity that is granted by the Speech or Debate Clause is intended to protect legislative process, not to protec members from accountability for criminal acts. If a member of Congress engage in illegal activities; let's say they sell the classified document to Russia, they could be prosecuted and face serious legal consequences.