MentalCase98: LMAO. When it’s Biden, he’s just an old fool who cant remember anything becuase of dementia -but when it’s Trump, it’s definitely criminal intent and he must be jailed.
At this point I doubt any country on earth has a more glaringly lopsided justice system than the US.
Biden has been talking to dead people from Germany and France but the left wing media wants us to believe it's Russian disinformation
IjeBos n buda be like white pipo need to give us reparation for slavery but they never asked Biden for the part he played to keep America segregated, pass a bill that locked up a lot of black people. Keep voting 🤣🤣
I am sure money that should go to the black community is being use to feed n house him. When they give one unqualified black person a position(DEI) you are excited not realizing what they are taking from the rest.
You are 45 years atleast, when will you have common sense?
basilico: The EU parliament is talking about banning Tucker from the EU. Talk about the absolute arrogance of the EU. Putin on a MSNDNC,CNN, BBC etc journalists interview would be gotcha questions. But I think Putin has been giving long interviews to media unlike joe Biden who comes with a reading list of journalists and their queries.
IjeBos: In case any one of our forum Fanboys wants to argue that Tucker is a journalist. Here is what the lawyers at Fox had to say when he was sued for slander. Basically that any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about what he says. My fault, reasonable wouldn't be a word I would use to describe Baslilico or Benalvino
IjeBos: Boy, what a dufus party. They bring an impeachment that every legal scholar says is an abuse and they can't even pass it. What nuts.
214 to 216 That's a close one. Like I said before, they should let the idiot replace people like you so people like you can see you have been voting people who does not regard you.
IjeBos: I think the US's legal system is what sets us apart. And he's trying to torpedo that. Fortunately he's dailing.. outside of Judge Canon and her curious delays.
I'm scared of the Supreme Court though. Realistically, they shouldn't take the appeal and let this ruling stand, but he has a couple of sycophants on there as well.
Like the sycophants in all these activist courts
E. Jean Carroll. Trump property case etc.
You don't trust them but you trust them because it rules against trump.
IjeBos: I think what is happening on the Republican side of Politics is quite fascinating. Below is the 2nd top leader of the house purposely lying in a tweet. I say purposefully because he has to know the bill doesn't allow 5,000 immigrants in at the border daily. He could have read the bill or had his staff read the bill or just picked up the phone and called one of the people who drafted it. But he does this because he has a low regard for the intelligence of Republican voters. And you can see the effect. Basilico and Bemeruca even though having the actual language of the bill in front of them are still arguing this made up fact.
IjeBos: I wonder where all Hunter Biden's fanboys are now with the same condemnation of Musk. Musk owns guns as well. I assume that FBI gun investigation will be loading any time.. Who are we kidding.
feedthenation: ---Whilst Putin banned over 900 US citizens---Comrade Carlson Tucker is in Russia---that the Russian media treated him like a celebrity---
🇺🇸🇷🇺🗞️ Il giornalista americano Tucker Carlson, che ora si trova a Mosca, ha detto che in Russia “va tutto molto bene”. Alla fine della scorsa settimana, sui canali Telegram sono apparse informazioni secondo cui Carlson era arrivato in Russia, in particolare è stata pubblicata… pic.twitter.com/2s6DDN6ltk
IjeBos: The meanings of words can't be this complicated for anyone. Holy Sh*t.
And an immigrant encountered at the border only becomes inadmissible when they are deemed by the agent to not be admissible. So a person who passes the initial screening(which they made harder) for asylum would be an admissible alien and let into the country.
It's your problem. I am sure if they used illegal aliens you would have understood. Too bad for you
IjeBos: Oh you don't fundamentally understand US immigration because it hasn't been explained to you on your Fox News Youtube clips.
For an inadmissible encounter, a border agent would have to meet/arrest (encounter) the person. And being inadmissible (not able to be admitted, because they don't have a visa and are unable to claim asylum), they would be removed and not allowed in the US. And that encounter of that inadmissible alien would count to that 5000 number.
Any alien who is not encountered by border agents would not be included in that count. But if an alien did make it to the US outside of legal porder ports of entry, they would not be allowed to even claim asylum if that 5000 figure of inadmissible aliens has been reached. This is the big deal. Gone would be the days that people can just step onto the US soil and claim asylum if that number of inadmissible aliens has been reached.
So all the people who show up at the border to seek asylum has visa?
IjeBos: Holy Shit. This idiot is arguing what the word inadmissible means. Here is the inevitable point where you try to obfuscate and divert because you are wrong as ALWAYS. You are literally trying to change the meaning of the word inadmissible, trying to argue that inadmissable really means they are allowed to enter. Lol.
IjeBos: Here's a riddle. If you have 4500 inadmissible alien encounters at the border on a given day. How many inadmissible aliens would be allowed into the country that day? Let me help you, since it seems quite a complex calculation for you. 0. The answer would be 0. As they are inadmissible. 🤣 🤣 🤣
You are embarrassing yourself again.
Inadmissible aliens: A person who entered the U.S. without a visa or a valid passport and has been living in the country for more than a year without authorization
IjeBos: I wrote earlier that there are people in this thread who don't read themselves but allow right wing Propaganda to lie to them. And what do you know. Here pops in Bemeruca, with more lies. In fact his post quotes my post with the actual text of the bill which refutes his post. All he had to do was read it. But instead he reposted numbers from the same merchants of lies he allows to fill his mind.
Maybe he has a hard time with the word "inadmissable". Which means they are not allowed in the US. Meaning they are automatically removed. I even went through the trouble of bolding and changing the color to red, to help people who don't have the strongest reading comprehension skills. Some people can't be helped (sigh).
Seems like you are suffering from comprehension issues or you don't understand what you post.
IjeBos: This is basilico on the new immigration law. Below that is the actual wording of the law. Tomorrow he will argue that he is never wrong, when 99% of everything he types is mostly wrong.
If there were 4,500 encounters per day over a 7-day period, the calculation would be:
Day 1: 4,500 encounters Day 2: 4,500 encounters Day 3: 4,500 encounters Day 4: 4,500 encounters Day 5: 4,500 encounters Day 6: 4,500 encounters Day 7: 4,500 encounters Total encounters over 7 days = 4,500 x 7 = 31,500
To calculate the 7-day average, take the total encounters and divide by 7 days:
31,500 encounters / 7 days = 4,500 encounters per day
So if there were 4,500 encounters per day consistently over a 7-day period, the 7-day average number of encounters would simply remain 4,500 per day. So if the consistent daily rate was 4,500 encounters over an entire year, the total number of encounters for that year would be 1,642,500.
In 2023, there was 3.2 million border crossing, and 2023 is regarded as the worst. I know this because I am one of them who entered through Mexico and asked for a job and an asylum.
Everybody stand in line 🤣 the border is still open, they just added a queue system.
basilico: So 5000 new illegals every day are welcome. What's do good about that. Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA), expressed his opinion of the bill in a more colorful way, “This bill is the worst screwing in the Senate since that Dem staffer filmed his
You didn't ask him why it is convenient for him to be lining up with fox news.
The bill is a useless bill, it only encourages more people to the border.
IjeBos: This is a Fox News Reporter's take on the new immigration bill that should be up for vote in the Senate soon. From this take it's a tough bill. I think it significantly changes how asylum has been done making it much harder to get, harder to claim and even when it is claimed reducing the processing time from years to 90 days. It makes it a less opportunistic way of entering the country and seems to get rid of some of the abuse we've been seeing.