raumdeuter: Democrats and identity politics Especially the white democrats. They try too hard
Diane Feinstein is dead RIP and the governor is already saying I will pick a Black woman.
What is wrong with just saying I will pick the best person. And after the pick the best person happens to be a Black woman.
Is it that they believe a black woman doesn't deserve it on merit unless they put their hands on the scale in her favor?
Same thing Biden did with Kamala and Ketanji. Especially Ketanji who was as qualified as anyone in the court but you have to tag her with "the black woman" qualifier
I don't remember Obama hammering on picking Hispanic woman for Sotomayor, she was simply the best person white black Hispanic man woman and every consideration
It's all racism. Biden still calls adult black men "boy" that's how back in the days they were referring to black men. If this was trump, just imagine.
budaatum: No si. It is you who appears to believe the crap you believe. I happen to know that white supremacy teachers don't last long in any school because most people, white and black, don't put up with that crap.
So how is asking students to show their work white supremacy?
budaatum: Si, it is you who thinks maths is racist. Its indicative of your inability to understand and comprehend, which is why I limit my engagement with you.
As for what my kids read, libraries, in these days of the world wide web, are old. And rather than limiting what kids read, which I can't considering what's out there, I teach them to reason instead so they are not easily swayed into stupidity like you are.
lmao. It is white supremacy for your kids to show their work in their mathematics homework. You believe that crap. poor you.
budaatum: People like antidump myself and many others here.
But why would I expect maths is racist you to comprehend anything.
You still think maths is racist... If you ever get a child, you should teach them by the how that book instruct you. That's if you don't go to a library with explicit books in them, take the books to your kids and give them a bit of your perverted mind.
budaatum: I think scorecards are marked by the electorate at the elections. But then you might be like basilico who believes dump is the current potus.
Note that not one of us antidumps here wish dump had won. We are perfectly happy with our non-toxic falling over Biden, even with his stupid son. And I'm certain we aren't the only ones.
Yet you posted a guy talking about people who didn't vote Trump the first time and will not vote for him now. You see your lunacy and why you don't believe what you say you believe? Biden's popularity is in the gutter while Trump is doing better than his 2 last elections.
1stGenAmerican: Tweeted by Trump’s spokesperson and confirmed by his dumbest and best bootlicker MTG. Why would his spokesperson lie on him, especially when he has made the statement to other outlets. He is still employed as his spokesperson so we know he told the truth, he just did so without thinking.
All of a sudden, his spoke persons are saints that have not lied at all to you people.
IjeBos: Fact Check: 1.) The post you replied to included a now deleted tweet by President Trump's spokesperson saying Trump purchased the gun. Are you claiming the spokesperson was lying? (pic below) 2.) MTG and her boyfriend discussed this live. The boyfriend's words "We can confirm that President Trump got that gun today".
First half of clip: I was there, we can confirm Trump got that gun today.
Second half of clip: Will the fake news stop reporting Trump got that gun. I was there he didn’t .
3.) Either they were lying then or they are lying now. Either way I would assume given Hunter Biden's charges, you would agree that an investigation is warranted to figure it out.
You continue to repeatedly rely on people who lie to you, and continuously look stupid for it. A smarter person at this point would know and do better.
He used the "Fact check" crap again 😁
Or you continue to reject the truth and lie to yourself regularly.
Just like how you continue to lie you have a GF even as we all know you are a confirmed homosexual.
60 Minutes discovered the U.S. is financing more than weapons in Ukraine. The government is buying seeds/fertilizer for farmers, paying the salaries of 57,000 first responders and subsidizing small businesses. https://t.co/vKWwWDqUwMpic.twitter.com/BxXItNgQce
President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice has taken a keen interest in all things Elon Musk.
The US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York is reportedly pursuing criminal charges against Musk, scrutinizing whether the Tesla CEO failed to disclose personal benefits he received from his car company.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the new inquiry centers around Tesla’s “Project 42,” an alleged plan for a weird glass home and structure that Musk talked about constructing in Texas but never built.
It is quite the happenstance that only last month, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division also launched a bizarre suit against Musk’s SpaceX, alleging the company engaged in employment discrimination against non-US citizens.
Or, to put it more plainly, the Biden administration, which, as we speak, is overseeing a historic surge of illegal border crossings, is suing America’s most successful legal immigrants for failing to hire noncitizens.
Among other things, SpaceX, which has partnered with the US military on projects, produces rockets that are considered advanced weapons technology.
As numerous commenters have pointed out, companies involved in comparable work, including Northrop Grumman, have used similar hiring practices.
Yet for some reason, the DOJ has singled out Musk.
Now a suspicious person might point out it would likely not be above a DOJ that indicts the opposition party’s leading presidential candidate, regularly sues states to overturn laws it doesn’t like and prosecutes parents who protest school boards and teachers unions to target a powerful political opponent.
After buying the social-media platform Twitter, he not only reinstated Donald Trump’s account but those of numerous other critics censored by the company’s previous regime.
Musk has opposed government COVID mandates, criticized the left’s “woke mind virus” and called Democrats the party of “division and hate.”
It will open the eyes of more and more people. These are the things trump and many others are facing. But they can't keep winning if they do this all the time
IjeBos: Such a clever, witty, well written post. I see why it got 9 likes. Slyfoxx do you think it is normal to spend your days creating and logging into accounts just to like posts referring to me? The depths of a Reprobate Mind..
You are a troubled human. Likes mean a lot to you? Go unite with a cousin or a friend. You behave like a lonely depressed person.
IjeBos: I'm sure she telepathically struck down the deal so it wasn't in the court transcript. You shouldn't hang around people where tellign the truth gets you in trouble(aka slyfooxx, benalvino). There's a good passage about iron sharpening iron you should refer to.
If you want to participate in this class you have to do the homework as assigned. Here is the homework again below. And for you I'll add another assignment.
3. (for basilico) Show me from either the plea deal or courtroom transcript, where the deal said "future crimes will be be ignored". I will not accept any other source discussing what the plea deal said.
You are indeed with the mental capacity of a lice.
basilico: Context is key. The deal failed because the judge saw through it. The judge wanted clarification on the immunity part whether, there was to be further investigations. The prosecution said yes. Hunter's lawyer shot up and implied there was to be full immunity of every other crime (including child abuse ) Hunter had ever committed or would ever commit after the trial. I don't see any political pressure here.They were running cover for Hunter, she could not go along with it
By not saying she struck down the deal, the judge scattered the deal to the winds. Context you see is king.
With impeachment inquiry, Weiss cannot be subpoenad because he is Special Counsel investigating Hunter .That is more cover-up for the Biden crimes.
The resident idiot Ijebos has become a grade one homework teacher.Really is that someone who studies latin?
The guy with lice brain ijebos is asking me how is it a sweetheart deal. A guy that commits several serious crime and on top of that they are giving him immunity for nothing... How is that not a sweetheart deal?
IjeBos: Yes, you are right. benalvino/bemeruca was wrong. And when he was called out, as usual, he deflected, backtracked, spun like a top, twisted like a pretzel and played his normal games so he wouldn't have to admit he was wrong, again. The deals was not struck down by the judge. In fact the judge made a point of saying she was neither rejecting or accepting the deal.
So why use the words "struck down"? Because the connotation of the phrase eludes to some power heavy handedly canceling it. And thus they want you believe the narrative that the "Judge struck it down", because the deal was "bad". Purely propaganda. Propaganda that benalvino bought into, as usual.
But the Judge didn't strike down the deal. The deal failed because the prosecutors bent to political pressure. In fact there is evidence that the prosecutor most likely lied when he said the "deal" didn't include foreign lobbying charges. In the emails discussing the deal, they agreed to that. So, the judge's job was to probe to ensure the defendant knew what he was pleading to. And so when she asked if the deal included Foreign lobbying charges, the prosecutor most likely lying, said no. Because of that and the language in the diversion agreement, the judge wanted 1.) to be briefed on the language and 2.) for them to go back and discuss it more. So she moved her decision.
But the deal was bad, she rejected the deal as a result of that. What was the deal bad for? It was bad for justice because corrupt ideots wanted to play the justice system.
Everyone knows what happened and they say that the judge struck down the deal but mumu will be mumu, ijebos think we are saying she uttered the word or she passed such judgment.
Find better thing to do. Your obsession with mumu is getting out of hand.
basilico: The judge did not use the actual phrase (I'm stiking the deal down) . The deal no longer holds anyway . But the coon wants you to show where those words were uttered. He then walks away claiming the 'deal being struck down' has been debunked How do people live with that level of foolishness?
I said the judge struck down the deal. No one ever said she uttered that word but ijebos the guy with the mental capacity of a lice want to win argument by asking a stupid question.
The judge made clear that she will not accept the deal they brought to her and they have to clarify what they really mean. She gave them a chance to do that. Guess what happened? Hunter is not getting a sweet heart deal anymore. Instead he is being indicted.
IjeBos: So, now you've morphed to "did not die" from the "the judge struck it down". Let's try this again:
You made the claim the judge "struck down" the deal, so back it up. This is what I posted.
And as expected, you didn't. Because you can't. Because you are wrong. The judge did not strike it down. I don't engage with people not smart enough to not always be wrong, yet too egotistical to admit that they are always wrong, so they twist themselves in pretzels massaging their wrongness.
Lmao.
I asked you to tell me how the plea deal of after the judge rejected it you are talking BS.
Again, is the plead deal still on the table or it has turned into something else? Answer this.
Did the judge accept the deal? Or she won't accept it until both sides present what deal they reached because they can't even agree to their deal. That's why she gave them time to sort themselves out. As to their initial presentation, that she rejected...
This is common sense and for someone who went to a Latin school in Boston not to have common sense baffles me
IjeBos: You made the claim the judge "struck down" the deal, so back it up. This is what I posted.
And as expected, you didn't. Because you can't. Because you are wrong. The judge did not strike it down. I don't engage with people not smart enough to not always be wrong, yet too egotistical to admit that they are always wrong, so they twist themselves in pretzels massaging their wrongness.
Wrong on what? Are you this stupid or you get incentives to win arguments on naira land.
I asked you a simple question, because you think words are always literal when you choose to believe your delusion.
Again, if the plead deal did not die why has everything change and no deal instead hunter is being charged? Are you this daft?
IjeBos: So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" the ruling. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.
Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. Why don't you post another NY post propaganda piece to make your point. You're a propaganda pin head. The most useful of idiots. You talking to basilico calling someone a fool. You got jokes.
Because words are always literal.
Let me ask you. How was the deal? Is it still pending or it has changed to something else?
Even a starfish can get this but it's unfortunate for you.
basilico: The dates man, you bumhead. Sep 2015 😗Shokin was the Prosecutor General. He set up the unit that went after Burisma , marking him as a threat to be neutralized.
A fool will always be a fool. Let him defend hunter and Biden. This is how he was playing semantics with the sweetheart deal when it was struck down.
IjeBos: Whenever you write a post I'm thankful I went to good schools that was thought how to think critically. You saw my posts, I included links and quotes and I try to include1st hand sources (i.e. the actual pdf of the State Dep. briefing Biden received). But you? You went online, googled Burisma, found the first article that aligned with what you thought and basically wrote verbatim what you found in the article. Here is the article. (I found it by putting a couple of your lines in your post in google) https://nypost.com/2023/09/08/despite-bidens-claim-europeans-werent-trying-to-oust-ukraine-prosecutor-targeting-hunters-firm/ And it was clearly written as a propaganda piece that you swallowed and regurgitated. What's the first tell. It's the NY Post.
So, where is this EU report your post is largely based on? Did you read it? Did you see the Shokin's name mentioned when they were praising the reforms? Or is that what the article told you it said? Are you just taking the word of whomever wrote the article? And then expecting me to take your word on it? That's the difference between you and I. I would have found that report and read it myself, to make sure it said what the article said it said, before talking about it. And that's the reason you're an idiot who repeatedly falls prey to Right Wing propaganda.
That you posted this, wow. There is a huge logical flaw in what you wrote. Figure it out and you may be smarter than a 5th grader. I'll check in to see if you figured it out and thus figured out how ridiculous what you wrote is.
Propaganda piece? hahaha, a simpleton says, so it has to be.
IjeBos: You've reached the point of the argument when you've lost, you know you're wrong and start playing semantics. The investigation was dormant because he was most likely bribed. So, he was NOT investigating Burisma As I said, Biden was following Obama State Department policy which he was briefed on before his trip. Everyone believed Shokin was corrupt and wanted him gone for the best interest of the US and Ukriane. Biden was sent to deliver that message. The message/policy of the Obama State Department. So unless you have Hunter paying Obama and all the State department employees as well, your conspiracy is stupid. End of Story.
Again, below is a clip of Biden's briefing from the Obama State Department. The briefing was released during the Trump impeachment as this whole thing was gone over in detail. Republicans are trying to rewrite history AGAIN aided by imbeciles like you.
you are beyond stupid at this point.
these are all facts In December 2015, the European Commission praised Ukraine's Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin for his anti-corruption efforts. This was 9 days after Joe Biden demanded Shokin be fired.
The EU report said Ukraine had made "noteworthy" progress in fighting corruption under Shokin. It praised the appointment of a new head of an anti-corruption office.
Shokin had seized assets of Mykola Zlochevsky, owner of Burisma, which hired Hunter Biden. This made Shokin a threat to Burisma, according to Hunter's business partner.
However, in March 2016 Shokin was forced out after Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in US aid unless Shokin was fired. Biden later bragged about getting Shokin fired, who at the time was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company paying Biden's son Hunter $1 million a year.
Shokin has denied being corrupt and said he was fired illegally due to Biden's pressure. Internal US memos show officials had recommended aid to Ukraine because of anti-corruption progress under Shokin.
The EU praise contradicts claims by Biden and others that European officials agreed Shokin was corrupt and needed to be removed.
All you do is to spread lies. You cling to the word Temporary like it changed anything. Get help and stop defending white privilege.
The Most likely bolded up there is fact abi? Or you're spewing more lies. If the investigation is dormant and he is bribed. Who is likely to do the bribing? The firm that Biden and his avatar hunter are working for, right? So why then should Biden be calling for him to be fired? Before you lie, use your head at least.
IjeBos: You're a fuxing idiot. Maybe you are having a hard time with the word dormant. Dormant: : marked by a suspension of activity: such as : [b]te devoid of external activity
At the time Shokin was fired, he was not investigating Burisma, because the investigation was dormant. Dormant = Not investigating. Everyone wanted him to investigate Burisma. Shokin was not.
They finally fired him, because Biden pressured them with not getting US Aid Money. The EU said they would have done the same, if they had the kind of money the US did. If he was protecting Hunter, why would he fire a prosecutor who had made the investigation dormant? This shit is not hard to understand. In fact it was Obama US policy, briefed to Biden by the State Department. Only f*cking cultish idiots like you and your nutters here keep repeating this BS. You sound stupid doing so to those with actual brains. But in your circle jerk, you're brilliant.
Below is the State department briefing material for Biden before his trip in 2015. This was produced as part of Trump's impeachment. So, all the BS right wing nuts you listen to know this exists, know they are lying and continue lying to you, because you Trumpers are uneducated idiots and they know you'll believe any BS. https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-08/VPBidenTPUkraineMeetingShokin.pdf
Suspension of activity or dormant as you put it does not mean what you initially claimed that the guy was not investigating burisma.
What is the.meaning of temporarily?
Remember how you were saying the sweet heart deal was not dead that it was just suspended. Well, how far with your spinning?
IjeBos: Just to put a button on this nuttery. This article was written in March 2016 before Trump became President. In 2016 right after he was fired, everyone was cheering the decision.
What does Trump have to do with this? Before Trump became president, the Bidens had been taking bribes that's what it means. Biden asked for the guy to be fired and he was fired else they won't be receiving the moola.
IjeBos: Just to put a button on this nuttery. This article was written in March 2016 before Trump became President. In 2016 right after he was fired, everyone was cheering the decision.
IjeBos: Fact Check 1.) Shokin (the Ukrainian Prosecutor General) was not investigating Burisma at the time he was fired. That was the problem, he wasn't investigating corruption. Because he was corrupt. So removing him would have brought in a prosecutor who would investigate corruption. 2.) The EU and the US State Department wanted him gone. Obama was the president and Biden was sent to deliver the message for the policy Obama's State Dept wanted. In fact some Republican Senators wrote a letter in support of the policy. The goal was to reduce corruption in Ukraine so that they could get EU membership and/or the US could give them more aid. 3.) Your argument is somehow, Hunter paid the EU, Obama, Secretary of State and some Republican Senators to get rid of a prosecutor that wasn't investigating Burisma and advocate for one who would? 4.) But don't believe me. Listen to super conservative (Freedom Caucus member, the caucus of all those leftists (Boebert, Gaetz and formerly MTG) Republican Ken Buck on Fox News on Sunday.
You are what a dullard, inhaling right wing propaganda sounds like.
You cannot lie to us by using the words Fact check.
The video could be someone ignorant. We have been following what was going on. The fact that he says there is no evidence linking Hunter and Biden is a red flag already.
According to a CNN poll, 61% of Americans believe that Pres. Biden was directly involved in his son Hunter's shady business dealings with Ukraine and China during Biden’s tenure as VP in the Obama administration. No wonder the Pres. is down in the polls.
1) support for Biden’s impeachment is growing among the public. Im impressed with how well Republicans are handling this. They learnt well from what the Democrats did to Trump. Keep dripping the evidence systematically from now till the election. Make sure every week there is one new shoe to drop. Hehe
2) Trump now officially ahead of Biden in 2024 polls. Incredible after everything they’ve thrown at this man lol. Democrats can’t believer their eyes.
They should not impeach him. It's only ijebos who have nothing to do but sok deek all day think this guy and his son are without blemish
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: 2026 Midterm Elections Live! by bemeruca: 11:31am On Sep 30, 2023
You believe that crap. poor you.
I see why it got 9 likes. 