BERNIMOORE's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BERNIMOORE's Profile › BERNIMOORE's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 (of 162 pages)
even when i minus only errings from this write ups from a deeper life member who was told todenounce his statement but denounce only one of them, imstill left with Some mouth watering allegations not adressed by colins [size=14pt]Colin Adua: A sister once told me that during her Deeper Life wedding that the wife of the regional overseer searched thoroughly for perming underneath their locally plaited hair, and if she had noticed one, that person would have been chased out of the wedding right there on her wedding day.[/size] the issue of perming was not addresed in odua's denounciation! see the wife and baba kumuyi watching and taking pics with bride with perm hair! Now, somebody in the same church, after years of humiliating and openly rebuking others for far lesser offfence, has the effrontery to adorn herself with perming(are you sure, that, is not weavon/wig), makeup, earing, wedding gown, see through show shoulder dress, against the church's 38 years preaching/ standard and the wedding was allowed to hold, while the GS was present, just because of what? Probably, because she is being married to the GS (Oga on top) son. And deeper life members were there, clapping for them, beaming with smiles, inside deeper life church. You people needs to try more harder to explain to me that there is no DOULBE STANDARD.
|
Pygru: https://www.nairaland.com/1350911/must-read-dust-raised-john/8#16995417 pygru; why posting colin Adua's post here? when i read his it on the other thread ijust laugh, because the deeper life church see him as betraying the church. cant someone speak his mind? colin Adua actuaally spoke his mind earlier, he was against the fraud, but he was approached by the DLCH, to renonce his stand, here is what he earlier said from his mind: with points; his points agreed with mine on the issue of double standard, 'A bunch of over pampered kids! enjoy your reading from colin Adua! Colin Adua: A bunch of over pampered kids!Colin. |
Pope John Paul made more than 40 pilgrimages to her shrines at Lourdes and Fatima. He wrote in his Apostolic Letter of Oct. 16, 2002, the following words: “I entrust this Apostolic Letter to the loving hands of the Virgin Mary, prostrating myself in spirit before her image in the splendid Shrine built for her by Blessed Bartolo Longo, the apostle of the Rosary.” or this; The Glories of Mary by Alphonsus de Liguori explicitly mentions Marian worship in the fifth stanza of the hymn, “Mary, Virgin of Virgins” (page 589). [size=14pt]“Queen thou art, whom all things worship, Earth and hell, and heaven above; But thy heart o'erflows with goodness, Just and sinners feel thy love.”[/size] http://willingshepherds.org/Aspirations%20to%20Mary.htm and to cap it all, Embroidered inside all of Pope John Paul’s robes was the phrase, “Totus tuus sum Maria,” which means, “Mary, I am all yours.” |
THE MARIAN PRAYER OF POPE JOHN-PAUL II [size=14pt]Sustain us, O Virgin Mary, on our journey of faith and obtain for us the grace of eternal salvation. O clement, O loving, O sweet Mother of God and our Mother, Mary! [/size] see one of the links; i can supply other links too http://prayers.viarosa.com/Prayers2BlessedVirginMary.html this raise some questions demanding a honest and unedited answer! Since Our Lady of Fatima (the Virgin Mary) asserts an equivalent position to Christ with respect to mediating salvation, we have a problem on our hands since 1 Timothy 2:5 together with Hebrews 7:23-25, Acts 4:11-12 and John 14:6 clearly and unequivocally state that Jesus Christ is the eternal and sole mediator who can save us and that he is the only way to the Father. Can the Virgin Mary have any possible rivaling salvaging role that also happens to be supported by scripture? No, it doesn’t… because salvation is a business done by Jesus and Jesus only. sacred Scriptures leaves no room for doubt or compromise. |
[size=14pt]Did they (pastor kumuyi and wife) develop apoplexy on seeing the bride? Were they pleading the ‘blood of Jesus’ and asking for mercy? Did they feel like crawling under a table to hide? Well, the wedding held, and each went to his home"[/size] ![]() |
OLAADEGBU, Here are some words very sweet from the mouth of this man called kumuyi " Proverbs 22:28.”Remove not the ancient landmarks, which thy fathers have set.” 1 Peter 3, 3 and 4:”Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; “But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.” Kumuyi has preached the above with fervency all his life. He even weeps on the altar at times when he talks of how the modern church has watered down the word of God. "The new Mrs Kumuyi[size=18pt] stepped out in a fitted wedding gown, with see through short sleeves, carried a bouquet of flowers, wore jewelry, and her face was made up[/size]. Her relaxed hair was even partially uncovered in church.[size=18pt] Pastor Kumuyi and his new wife, Esther, were there in their puritanical estate. Did they develop apoplexy on seeing the bride? Were they pleading the ‘blood of Jesus’ and asking for mercy? Did they feel like crawling under a table to hide? [/size] Well, the wedding held, and each went to his home".Pastor Kumuyi bend the rules because his son was involved! simple! |
for the uptenth time,OLAADEGBU FAILED TO PROVIDE A PICTURE, TAKEN IN THE CHURCH, SHOWING THAT THE NEW MRS KUMUYI IS WITHOUT JEWELRY! HAVING CRUSHED THE CONCUCTION HE EARLIER PROVIDED TO AS 'FRAUD AND THEFT OF IDENTITY' I EXPOSE THE PHOTOSHOP DETAILS AND TO PUT SALT ON HIS WOUND,DLCH ORDERED THE THREAD CLOSED, AFTER I EXPOSE THE PHOTOSHOP DETAILS! IM STILL AWAITING PICTURE PROOFS BEIGN SNAP INSIDE THE CHURCH ON THE WEDDING DAY OF 'JOHN AND LOVE' TO COUNTER THESE AUTHENTIC BELOW WITH JEWELRY; ROMANS 2:21 you, therefore, who teach another, do you not teach yourself? [size=18pt]You who preach that one shall not steal, do you steal?[/size] KUMUYI TEACH ONE THING, BUT PRACTICE ANOTHER, SEE PICS OF THE PERSON THAT DEPRIVED A CHURCH MEMBER TO DRESS WELL IN HER WEDDING DAY, BUT PERMIT 'JEWELRY AND PERMED HAIR' FOR HIS SONS WEDDING; CHAI, DOUBLE STANDARD,
|
OLAADEGBU FAILED TO COUNTER THIS FRAUD! WE DON SEE YANSH OF A FOWL ![]() |
NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER CAN BE ESTABLISHED UP TILL NOW THAT THE BRIDE IS NOT WEARING JEWELRIES! ANYONE WITH ANY CONCRETE EVIDENCE CAN COME OUT TO SHOW IT, BUT THEN, THE NEW MRS KUMUYI IN HER ATTIRE WEARING ERRINGS AGAINST DEEPER LIFE STANDARD, KUMUYI DOUBLE STANDARD EXPOSED!
|
OLAADEGBU That means that there is still hope for Nigeria if the likes of BERNIMOORE do not reflect what we have as "lawyers" and "journalists" (who said that there were earrings where there were none), in Nigeria.Yes, there were errings on the lady,(in 3rd circle) you have not proved otherwise;
|
tpia tpia@:Errand boy typia, so you fear to live with law? you fear to be accountable for your actions, Fraudulent nigerians like olaadegbu will not have their ways if im practicing law, he would be in jail for this particular picture sample b1 that he photoshoped, misleading and 'for theft of identity' can you see the pics with unplastered building even exposing its conduit wires? i doubt if an errand boy will see that. |
OLAADEGBU That means that there is still hope for Nigeria if the likes of BERNIMOORE do not reflect what we have as "lawyers" and "journalists" (who said that there were earrings where there were none), in Nigeria.i have proved that the picture with the errings SAMPLE B2 are the authentic! SAMPLE B2 corresponding with SAMPLE A directly but you are yet to prove that SAMPLE B1 was not photoshoped by you,SAMPLE B1 without errings (was a request by you to mislead by using one of the bride's picture while dressing up in a roo before putting on eerings abd was photoshoped by adding features to make the picture to have life, and the fact that on request from deeper life, the thread you reffered to as a proof was closed today after "i" expose the truth shows that im correct you are OLE! ![]()
|
Tunisque [quote author=Tunisque] I will never forget what i came across some time ago on the internet that not all humans are humans. Yes! Not humans are humans even some behind some computer somewhere posting some trash so they can drag more souls into the kingdom of the devil. I only pity the naive ones who don't know their left from right.i dont know what you are talking about! ![]() just back from work, it was not possible to reply you when you are posting, i was busy, im back home now, and happy for a good day! The devil is threatened going by what the Lord is doing through His servant especially through the monthly miracle and revival programme. He wants him to resign so the work can stop. NO! We are sorry to disappoint you and your fallen angels behind some funny user ID that he will not resign. He will only retire to refire..so, what you are saying now is that Deeper life's lifeline is KUMUYI, nobody ecxept kumuyi, i oftenhear people loving their pastors more than jesus and God, kumuyi,kumuyi kumuyi, is he your God? or immidiately he is removed, Deeper Life is as good as DEAD! why did you develop such attachment to a mere human other than jesus? and you will not be able to live again if he is no more(i expect you to say 'its not his portion in jeesus name' why cant you for once face reality?) what if he die like other pastors,(oshofa,idahosa etc..... Or is he immune to death? you cannot even think, OLAADEGBU is even using that zeal of yours to promote his crime! The work of God will continue and more souls will be won into the Kingdom of God. You and your fallen angels may start as many threads as possible, you will all fail. Darkness can never overcome light, the truth of the Word of God will prevail. On Christ the solid rock, we standyou can continue in ignorance! which God are you even talking about,which miracle? give me just one phone number of just one person ever healed by kumuyi and i will expose the truth, he never heal anyone! pls prove me wrong,not insult but proof! people like you swallow anything! what a myopic view? you came on the thread and the fire of Deeper Life addiction in you blinded you, not to read,and put things in the real perspective, you are here talking things your leaders thought you, and ola was just laughing where he was, let me just give you some grace and really ask if you actually ignore the details on the thread but choose to insult at all cost, but you will be the one to run away from the thread, im the owner, and it will last till i want! have you tried to read the tread from the beggining? if you dont, your next response will be met with what people like you deserve, i dont have anything against Deeper life members, but OLAADEGBU' CRIMINAL MANIPULATION AND PRESENTATION OF A PICTURE TO SAVE FACE, which i choose to expose! and up till now, on page 3 now, he did not deny, but wanted to fan religious sentiment to cover up. |
Tunisque i love devout christian like you; Tunisque: Whether the pictured was photoshoped or not, one fact still remains and that is the bride was not putting on earrings.Wow! you admitted that SAMPLE B1 was photoshoped after the producer OLA failed to counter B2 as the one altered! Sorry man, it cannot remain a fact again having admit 'controversially trying to criminally cleanse the error' maybe you dont know that OLA who supplied this criminally induced picture to deceive has added a new case to the one on ground, siddon there they yarn o ![]() And be that as it may, i am glad to tell you that God has taken control.which God? which control, KUMUYI IS THE GOD HERE, he is the supreme of DL NOW, he has broken the law of God of beign an overseer! ola tried to criminally save him but failed woefully as he even compound the case, and even the site he supplied was quickly closed after beign exposed! Who knows the author of the 'photoshoped picture' could even be some evil agent just out to tarnish the image of DL. But no matter their plan, they have failed, the Lord is with us like a mighty terrible onethank you, admitting that, thats why the tread reads OLAADEGBU, You Are Soiling DEEPER LIFE Reputation With Manipulation. . Those criticizing should read their bible and do the right thingyes, that is what i have done, the bible allows outsiders to criticise in this case read it again you just passed in in my previous post; 1 Timothy 3:1-7 New King James Version (NKJV) Qualifications of Overseers 3 This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop,[a] he desires a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach; 3 not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous; 4 one who rules his own house well, having his children in submission with all reverence 5 (for if a man does not know how to rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of God?); 6 not a novice, lest being puffed up with pride he fall into the same condemnation as the devil. 7 Moreover he [b]must have a good testimony among those who are outside, lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.. verse 7;"must have a good testimony among those who are outside[/b], lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil".. now tell me did kumuyi invite reproach upon himself and fell to dvil snare? |
pygru you see ya sef, wetin concern ^^ with the topic of your thread:because Ola provided the link as a couter proof that 'jewelry' was added(which later was proved wrong) and he took the responsibility of the burden, that is 'the onus of proof' to give or supply evidences further to show that the picture he supplied as an evidence tagged as 'Altered version' was really altered, but reverse is the case, the one tagged 'untouched' was misleading, in the face of the following futher facts not countered up till now by ola, but rather he is seeking to distract issues; THE SITE ola directed me TO COMPARE, WHICH I DID; BELOW; OLAADEGBU: Before you begin to laugh try comparing the two pictures below:ON THIS thread; https://www.nairaland.com/1350911/must-read-dust-raised-john/6 then after comparing the pics on the site olaadegbu supplied, and pointed out the photoshoped ingredients in the images, shame forced the DLCH to close the thread below, earlier reffered as their backbone and proof; https://www.nairaland.com/1330381/pastor-kumuyis-son-ties-knot/10#16415012 deeper life church and their faithfuls have failed to produce a picture of kumuyi's wedding, showing that the bride did not wear errings,except speculating the question is; how would kumuyi a G.O go for a wedding of such, and wanted to come and lie to the nigerian branch that there was no double standard? if not because of media and internet, faster than the plane kumuyi boarded, only for him to start defending until he offered to resign, up media! up fast internet! down liar kumuyi! down controversial double standard man kumuyi! up till now, baba kumuyi and disciples were not able to produce authentic pics as proofs to exonerate them! they(kumuyi and co) are guily as charged having FAILED TO PRODUCE COUNTER EVIDENCE! no wonder ola was against the journalist of this thread https://www.nairaland.com/1350911/must-read-dust-raised-john/6 he blamed the media! hhe tried to distract us with a crusade that UNDER FIRE pastor kumuyi was arranging, this reminds me of the deceits in kumuyi's miracles, can any one give me a name of an AMPUTATED PERSON ever healed by kumuyi? just one, lets investigate, and you will find lies. the whole charade of DL what 'stage-managed' and fraud. let me give names of healed people in the bible, # daughter of jairus (death) but raised # lazarus;dead # Naman (leprous hands healed ) can we have names and adresses of those healed by kumuyi? if none provided with ease? then THEY ARE ALL FRAUD ![]() ![]() |
OLAADEGBU, Can you sincerely read this to PASTOR KUMUYI! VERSE 2 below; "overseer is to be above reproach" emphasis on verse 5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?) 7 "He must also have a good reputation with outsiders" verse 15 "you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth". and based on these facts emphasis on verse 5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?),the fact that it takes 'outsiders to whip him to his sins' (vs7 "He must also have a good reputation with outsiders" above can he honourably resign rather than intimidating those who are suppose to tell him the truth like samuel told saul, like nathan told david and like what happened btw paul and appolos?1 Timothy 3 New International Version (NIV) Qualifications for Overseers ann deacons 3 Here is a trustworthy saying: Whoever aspires to be an overseer desires a noble task. 2 Now the overseer is to be above reproach, faithful to his wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money.4 He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him, and he must do so in a manner worthy of full[a] respect . [size=14pt]5 (If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God’s church?)[/size] 6 He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7 [size=14pt]He must also have a good reputation with outsiders[/size], so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil’s trap. 8 In the same way, deacons[b] are to be worthy of respect, sincere, not indulging in much wine, and not pursuing dishonest gain. 9 They must keep hold of the deep truths of the faith with a clear conscience. 10 They must first be tested; and then if there is nothing against them, let them serve as deacons. if you cant, then you are a disgrace to christianity, and should direct your attack to repairing your home! |
at pygru are you changing mouth now like your founder kumuyi? why are you not having business with me again? Pygru:on page zero before anybody comment you wrote this below on my pics posted: Re: OLAADEGBU, You Are Soiling DEEPER LIFE Reputation With Manipulation! by Pygru: 12:37pm On Jul 17:"You no get work undecided" at " 12:37pm On Jul 17"You no get work undecided(Quote) (Report) 3 Likes (Like) again on this page you posted jobless to my post Pygru: Quote Postbut having being diappointed by the fact that the thread you supplied where you said ola got the photoshoped pics and trying to exonerate ola, deeper life ordered the thread closed! wetin them they hide? now suddenly you(errand boy) have no proof than to accept 'forgery' and 'theft of identity' on behalf of deeperlife and Ola |
arrister, next time please, it is thread , not tread , lolsorry sir, im not a barrister, but im elated(not admitting) for calling me that, and just because you quoted an error which i want to correct thats why im responding, anyway thanks, maybe i need some education , thank you o jare! im just in a haste. |
@PYGRU Pygru: I no even know which word to use for you sef.[size=18pt]Latest imformation! [size=14pt]deeper life have ordered the only tread that served as the lifeline which i exposed the picture there as beign photoshoped CLOSED TO SAVE FACE. until page 3 now, ola have not denied responsibility of the picture, may be after exposing him now he will start denying it, im waiting for that, but you are just a forking Errand Boy! poor you ![]() Can you be a man to supply further proof to counter their mess? im waiting![/size] ![]()
|
OLAADEGBU [size=14pt]i affirm that im not a JW! Show me where i have ever said that im a JW, just one! true2God and itsfact says because they observe 'like you earlier did' that some of my view supports the JW views, then i must be one, then i ask for a proof,that to prove,beyond reasonable doubt that: 1, im a barrister/or id barrister and 2 a jw other than insinuations and speculations there is no proof inanywaywhatsoever, you are really bothered now who this man bee seff wey dey expose us, chaii[/size] again dont divert the tread, did you photoshop the pics you tagged 'untouched'? if yes you are guilty of criminal manipulations and THEFT OF IDENTITY |
"The new Mrs Kumuyi[size=18pt] stepped out in a fitted wedding gown, with see through short sleeves, carried a bouquet of flowers, wore jewelry, and her face was made up[/size]. Her relaxed hair was even partially uncovered in church.[size=18pt] Pastor Kumuyi and his new wife, Esther, were there in their puritanical estate. Did they develop apoplexy on seeing the bride? Were they pleading the ‘blood of Jesus’ and asking for mercy? Did they feel like crawling under a table to hide? [/size] Well, the wedding held, and each went to his home".Pastor Kumuyi bend the rules because his son was involved! simple! " Proverbs 22:28.”Remove not the ancient landmarks, which thy fathers have set.” 1 Peter 3, 3 and 4:”Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; “But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.” [size=18pt]Kumuyi has preached the above with fervency all his life. He even weeps on the altar at times when he talks of how the modern church has watered down the word of God.[/size] Was Love, [size=18pt]daughter of a National Overseer of deeper life[/size]right to have broken ranks, while she remained a member of the church? Did she commit a sin, or did she not? . Yet again. [size=18pt]Did Love wear the jewelry and make up her face only on wedding day? Did her father not know long before now that she wore jewelry? [/size]This time, let the father of the bride answer. see the pics of a National Overseer of deeper life(the father of bride) smilling while bringing her daughter into the church in what deeper life termed 'worldly adornment' is the hight of beign a hypocryte and also maintaining double standard compare with faithful sister of same church caged by the rule, when these General and national overseers are lawbreakers,;
|
OLAADEGBU: @BERNIMOORE, DrummaBoy, Pastor Kun, frosbel, truthislight, babsomotde;so the man kumuyi has not resigned? i think its high time for him to leave honorably because he has failed, his crusade show is like forcing himself as Gods chosen, when like saul when the spirit of God left saul, saul started slaughtering animal for sacrifices, a job designated for the levi priests, this further aggravate Gods spirit and samuel warned..."to obey is better than sacrifice" your general overseer has disobeyed, Gods spirit has left him, cant you see that? well [size=18pt]he is not worthy to be an overseer for maintaining double standard, one for the so called brethren,another for his family;[/size] lets see what the bible says that need to be considered 1 Timothy 3:1-7 New King James Version "This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop,[a] he desires a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach; 3 not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous; 4 [size=18pt]one who rules his own house well, having his children in submission with all reverence 5 (for if a man does not know how to rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of God?)[/size]; 6 not a novice, lest being puffed up with pride he fall into the same condemnation as the devil. 7 Moreover [size=18pt]he must have a good testimony among those who are outside[/size], lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. ola and co, ponder on this again (only if you have shame); [size=18pt]"for if a man does not know how to rule his own house, how will he take care of the church of God"?[/size] we see him in the picture with the sons wife hair permed, transparent gown, JEWELRIES, and make up, all denied from church member in the 1st pics;
|
[size=28pt]afterall 'A PICTURE TAKING IN A PRIVATE ROOM WHILE THE BRIDE WAS DRESSING UP,BEFORE SHE PUT ON HER JEWELRY,WAS PHOTOSHOPED USING AN UNPLASTERED BUILDING AS BACKGROUND AND WAS USED FOR DECEIT HERE'[/size] ![]() criminals! using religion platform ![]() |
up till this page 2, no denial from OLA as to the photograph B1 sample b1 beign photoshoped, but he sends errand boys to answer attrocities he commited. what a manner of man of God ![]() |
image123 you showed that you dont even have common sense here; image123:The more distant a thing is from the camera, the smaller it becomes, pretty common sense image123 i sincerely do not see any big hat or small hat. Probably what you are forcing yourself to see may be due to what is called [size=14pt]distance. The more distant a thing is from the camera, the smaller it becomes,[/size] pretty common sense. Another thing is that it is not out of this world for a lady to change her hat. It does not need for a bill to be passed for that to happen, neither does it require great length of time like days or years.let me prove with ola's picture, its a pity you are the one receiving this bash ![]() see the arrows, B1 with big hat 'the brides head is farther, there is a gap btw the head and the roof of the pics, since its a bit father than the other pic B2, then lets apply your law here of 'The more distant a thing is from the camera, the smaller it becomes' B1(alledged 'untouched') is farther, is supposed to be having smaller HAT(worn by the woman beside the bride), but the woman CARRIES BIG HAT incredible ![]() B2 that[b] is nearer and is supposed to be having a bigger HAT(worn by the woman beside the bride) but the woman there was the one carrying the smaller hat this alone cast doubt on the miracles you church performs, all the people told that they are healed often become deaf when they got back home because some are partial deafness, anyway see the pics below that exposed your analogy 'The more distant a thing is from the camera, the smaller it becomes'
|
image123 again like a loose goat you vommitted in bold below, you started 'a defence statement' like this, and you dont even know the object saying.'something' 'woman(the mother) is likely holding her hand or something' The [size=18pt]woman(the mother) is likely holding her hand or something[/size]. i do not see these details that you are assuming, sincerely. Did you notice at close range that the two of them are not putting on jewellery, do you notice that? i doubt, you cannot notice that kind of thing. Did you notice that in every other picture passed on the internet including the one supposedly from the engagement and the one she was in skirt suit?yes i noticed the photoshoped pics supplied by your OGA, which you swallowed without question, since you have admitted that it was taking somewhere else, the tell your oga to produce where he cropped the pics, i have shown you where the AUTHENTIC SAMPLE B2 came from, if you google it alone, on the first page you will not see less than 50 of the pics, but the other one you are directing me to look that has no jewelry is ONLY 2 on the internet, and the two are same size, from same source OLAADEGBU. [size=14pt]so, the picture you are directing me to look that has no jewelry WAS A PICTURE TAKING IN A PRIVATE ROOM WHILE THE BRIDE WAS DRESSING UP,BEFORE SHE PUT ON HER JEWELRY, CANT YOU SEE THAT SHE WAS GLANCING AT THE MIRROR IN FRONT OF HER, BUT THE MIRROR HAS BEEN CROPPED SO AS TO DECEIVE'[/size] |
Image123 Image123: i didn't want to reply or comment before, seeing the gross foolishness in the questions asked, and how i would rather avoid foolish questions. Nevertheless, i would answer for posterity.[size=18pt] i said "probably outside in a shady environment"[/size]. you would need to learn both the spelling and meaning of the word "shady". A dictionary will help you. i was not there, and so i cannot assert things forcefully like you are doing. however, i can make sensible conclusions and assumptions from what is on ground having attended weddings before and having taken pictures before. Light and exposure of camera lens affect picture quality and complexion. you do not even need to pass O'levels to know this.bolded above shows that you dont know what we are discussing,[size=14pt] probably taking outside [/size] but 'we are talking of when the bride stepped inside the church' so we are correct to believe the picture taking inside the church showing the bride jewelry [b]so you failed again by not producing a picture taking inside the church and this means you have to counter proof [/b]rather than 'probably' or 'likely'.....yum yum yum.these cannot stand a court trial! you cant stand before a court judge to defend a criminal exhibit leveled against you by saying probably or likely, you will be told to your face that 'you did not deny in affirmation' the pictures were tagged accordingly in samples ( SAMPLE A),SAMPLE B; (B1,B2).... and anyone commenting should be able to mention the one he/she is contending with, but blinded by the loyalty to your oga ;(OLA) you came into the tread like a loose goat with the rope on the neck crawling behind the goat and very hungry you want to feed on anything eatable and you started eating what you dont know YUMM let me help you out OLAADEGBU came with this two pics below SAMPLE B;(B1,b2), he was making a case of different version [size12pt]of just one of the picture taken in the church[/size] SAMPLE A, he tagged one of the pics compared in sample A as 'untouched' and the other 'altered version' and the use of word 'Version' as used in the context is to provide us with 'a picture,or same picture of the same capture and same position which is in its untouched state' a version maybe in HD(high defination) or Ordinary, what changes is the effect, and not position, i did not on my own dig, but Ola told me 'to compare' and sited a link below https://www.nairaland.com/1350911/must-read-dust-raised-john/6 OLAADEGBU: Before you begin to laugh try comparing the two pictures below and tell me if she was wearing earrings:after comparing the pics, i raised some observations, i was expecting him to clear but to my surprise, he just wants me to ignore those manipulations and go ahead to accept or swallow his Concuctions, but i insisted on these differences below; SAMPLE B2, Zoomed and compare with SAMPLE A was a direct copy of the bride without argument,and until a bigger picture of SAMPLE B1 showing naturally people around it is produced to counter this SAMPLE A, this particular act of (1)misleading, and (2) criminal manipulation features of SAMPLE B2 that totally agrees with SAMPLE A; # she smiles, # facing up, # and gripping her flowers (at the stem) with both hands, # and the woman beside the bride was not wearing a big hat, # moreso, the wall of the church was plastred SAMPLE B1 ( reffered to as untouched) was zoomed, and the manipulations were shoking! SAMPLE B1 is at its best (cut out) from one of the pictures taking from the brides dressing room before she wore the jewelries, lets compare the features of SAMPLE B1 with SAMPLE B2 # facing down # picture pasted in an uncompleted building exposing the conduit pipes, was the wedding done in an uncompleted building? a desperate attempt to get a background like that of the church in SAMPLE A (poor job) # two hands wearing rings were cut out and placed beside the flower to cover-up poor blending with the woman in green,suggesting that no hands were holding the flowers at all! incredible! ![]() # the woman in green beside the bride is wearing an oversized hat, ; but in the original SAMPLE A it was a small/moderate hat. |
OLAADEGBU: Come, See And Encounter[size=28pt]stage managed events[/size], now since no deeper life member is commenting,or denying this obvious fraud, now i know why some of them are complaining that the children of their pastors live the life they want but church members are under the bondage of Kumuyi |
OLAADEGBU OLAADEGBU: Does your watchtower organisation prevent you from attending programmes as these?you are derailing this tread, im not a jw, so needless of this diversionary topic, create another tread for that, severaly we have asked you to defend yourself on this obvious manipulationthat you \re guilty of, but you are shouting God, this God that! when you dont even know God! you resort to shouting torment in hell, torment in hell just because i ask you to defend a fraudulent pics you posted to mislead people, but to the wrong person you are shouting, because im not even moved an inch from my stand, but i continue to watch your show of shame dancing around the truth |
OLAADEGBU now i understand this better, "[size=14pt]A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit[/size]" a good christian will not manipulates picture to cover up a seeming failure! Matthew 7:15-18 15 B[b]eware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing[/b], but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18[b] A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit[/b], neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. |
OLAADEGBU: Another tried and tested tactic of the accuser of the brethren is to make the first accusationaccuser of the brethren? who elevates you as one of the brethren? you dont force respect for yourself, but you need to earn it! you have manipulated a picture and you were mute on that because its embarrassing, do you really see anything wrong in 'criminal alteration' like the one you provided and was discovered? |
OLAADEGBU: Ai tete mole ole mu oloko. Another tried and tested tactic of the accuser of the brethren is to make the first accusation.Tani ole? tani oloko, iwo gangan ni oleee! anwi bayii oloonigbo, a tun wi bayii oloonigba, o tun nwa eeyan kunra! ah, o ti fe te bayii na afi igbati o baronupiwada! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 (of 162 pages)
above can he honourably resign rather than intimidating those who are suppose to tell him the truth like samuel told saul, like nathan told david and like what happened btw paul and appolos?