₦airaland Forum

MedicH:
Just like i said i may not know how you animals run it in the zoo.

Peace

Go back to your wild Jungle. The zoo is for groomed animals

lahizak:
Put on a weak defence? INEC dont even need to bring out d original result b4 dey could claim dat d document wit him is fake? Truth is dat INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt dat d document is fake but tge judges decided dat wat INEC said does not matter, is wat dey want dey will do hence d saying dat INEC did not prove beyond doubt. And paid or not, INEC is still independent, so d jugdes should av atleast heed their word. Finally, im guessing now dat d supreme court has made their statements and their judgement is now public, more legal minds in d country and outsude d country will analyze it and we shall all read. Im sure this is not d last we will hear about this issue. Lastly, ot rly seems APC need Imo state badly 4 one reason or the other. And funny enough all d 7 judges were uninanimous on this topic dat generate such huge outrage, dat means sumtin is fishy, the only time judges are unanimous is when issues are straightforward which obviously dis is not, wonder how not even 1 judge vote against it. Strange

Can you provide how INEC proved beyond reasonable doubt that the documents were fake?

I want to learn something new

jcross19:
I laugh again! if you believe that opposition party could ousted APC out of IMO is a big lie, APC have the whole mercenaries in the state to maneuver the result but they failed ! this is my question are you telling me that 388 polling units voted only for APC?

The cancelled results were FROM ORLU which happened to be Uzodinmas strongholds.

The judgement stated clearly that the appellant (UZODINMA) scored overwhelmingly above the others in the cancelled PUs and this means even if the others got votes it would read something like

APC 548
PDP 4

APC 729
PDP 13

Surely you cannot expect an Mbaise man to drag votes with an Orlu man in Orlu?

The other parties were mostly insignificant because the votes were mainly between APC and PDP

MedicH:
At this point you can just be called mentally unstable and insane. A given number of ppl are accredited to vote in an election and the sharia court dabbles into it and the total votes casted supercede the number of accredited voters and a grown up, went to school, but uneducated adult says it's perfect. Wonderful. Pls eeh sone things are sacroscant and one is the number of accredited voters in an election. This value is sacroscant and constant. It is important because it gives you a backdrop to check and balance results from the polls against any malpractice. except i don't know how you guys do una own in una zoo.

At this point you can just be called mentally unstable and insane if you cannot understand something as simple as A RULING BODY CAN ONLY MAKE JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENTS ON APPEALS PRESENTED BEFORE THEM AND CANNOT STRAY FROM THE APPEAL TO AN AREA WHICH IS NOT IN CONTENTION OR WHICH HAS NOT ALSO BEEN TABLED AS AN APPEAL.

Stupid people everywhere

berrystunn:
Note , they said the elections in those areas were ruin with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How will you expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to satisfactory ?

Do they have the power to cancel irregularities?

They said?

Who said?

What were the irregularities?

Plus10:
Results from those polling units were marred with irregularities,that's why it was rejected.

What irregularities? Plus who rejected them? Were those who rejected them the ones meant to do so after all party agents have duly signed on the documents?

SC declared the cancellation as illegal and thus reinstated them

Simple

jcross19:
if the results are true then everything need to add up but that's not case here , to tell you that it's fraudulent .

The results were already falsified and inflated before Uzodinmas results were added so of anyone needs to explain it is INEC

Urchman200:
tell us ur academic understanding from the whole judgment.

I already did. Check my post after the judgment

Mashallah:
Are you a lawyer?
Who made you a judge here?
My post is connected to same atrocities Buhari is committing in Nigeria.

The thread is not about Buhari but about the SC and Imo judgement. Get some sense at least

lahizak:
So wat u re telling me in essence is dat a duplicate result copy was brought forward. INEC claimed it is not theirs and failed to bring forth the original copies which they can easily claimed was damaged during one of d election violence. Den immediately, d court decided dat as a result of dat, d result brought by d other party is valid. Here is a question though, after uzodimma brought the duplicate copy to the court, who supposed to determine if d duplicate copy is legut or not. D court or the issuing body? Better put, weneva dere is an issue of forgery in court, who is called to validate the document, d court or an expert on d document?

The court does not handle forensics.

Experts do and the experts in this case are the supposed owners of the documents submitted by hope. INEC!

They are to prove that the one with Hope was fake but they could not because the originals could not be produced and I can conclude from this alone that they knew hopes documents were not fake and if they had brought theirs out it would not contradict that of hope so they just decided to put up a very weak defence perhaps because they had already been paid by PDP to try and discredit the result but never knew Uzodinma would push the case as far as he did.

The SC was the litmus test that revealed their agenda

drnoel:
How can it be justifiably ruled if the total number of voters exceeds those accredited to vote? Don't u smell a fish somewhere?

My nose is clean and yours must be rotten to smell fishes even when there are none.

The case and ruling were simple.

Omitted results

SC focused on the appeal and delivered justifiably.

jcross19:
All am seeing here is that criminal is trying all possible means to justify thieves and try to creates another type of mathematics where 1+3+7=234! wonderful intact supreme court justices are mathematics guru.

If anyone claims your wrist watch is fake should he not be able to produce the original of your wrist watch for sake of comparison and assessment?

If he cannot, how then did he arrive at the fact that your wrist watch is fake?

The courts are not the streets where baseless claims are made without contention.

In the courts he who makes a claim must prove his claim

Sanchez01:
The added votes far exceeded the accredited voters count. That is the bone of contention and not how he won. The figures do not add up.

That is not the business of the SC.

Inec is to explain this.

The SC only dealt with the issue in contention and it was not vote count or vote recount

Leo3333:
OK. Good then...but in YOUR OWN view, having now seen the gross disparity in the figures, do you think the SC should allow their judgement to stand?

My answer is yes!

I can also say the results were already inflated before Uzodinmas cancelled votes were added.

Or do you not know that in Mbaise Ihedioha scored results which were far more than accredited voters ?

Leo3333:
Since the SC has now fully usurped the role of INEC, they should do well then by telling us the figure, PU -by-PU of Accredited Voters and what each party scored in those 388 PUs.

The SC did not usurp the role of inec.it can also be argued that the results given to Ihedioha were actually inflated figures and it took the reinststement of Uzodinmas results to reveal the inflated results already given to Uzodinma as the total tally was considered

I gather Ihedioha had results in Mbaise which were far above accredited voters

Leo3333:
Oga, so how then did the Total Number of Votes exceed the Total Number of Accredited Voters?
Whose figure do we trust? INEC's or SC's

Waiting.

This is not the focus of the ruling as no appeal was filed requesting a vote recount.

The SC has no business dabbling into an issue which is not in contention between both parties.

lahizak:
Educated illiterate, supreme court been d apex court threw out all oda evidences nd proves concerning this case and accept to judge on d validity of a document which d issuing body denied it belongs to them. Hence forcing a candidate on d people. Do u get d gist or ur small head still no grab?

Educated illiterate what other evidence were presented by INEC/IHEDIOHA to prove that the documented and duly signed results UZODINMA tendered was fake?

If you deny a document and claim verbally that it is fake then you need to back up your verbal assertion with actual physical proof. That is how the law works. The law does not take comments on face value alone.

It is all about proving your case and INEC/IHEDIOHA could not prove theirs beyond reasonable doubt.

You need to enter a courtroom at least once in your life so this level of your illiteracy regarding legal matters can be cured

Racoon:
This is a public forum & everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.You cant force anyone to accept your worldview.Dispute your cause with fact.Yes hausa-fulani are there, but their brethren in the APC proved to be the most barbaric ever seen.

He has been removed. Case dismissed

RareDiamond:
Nawa for this ridiculously unjust judgement by the Supreme Court. This judicial rascality must stop.

Still on the Supreme Court ruling on Imo Guber Election: (Why the Supreme Court must reverse itself)

The law is settled as decided by the same Supreme Court in Buhari v. INEC (2008); that "weight can hardly be attached to a document tendered in evidence by a witness who cannot or is not in a position to answer questions on the document. One of such persons the law identifies is the one who did not make the document. Such a person is adjudged in the eyes of the law as ignorant of the content of the document”.

Questions for the CJN, Justice Tanko and other Supreme Court Justices:

1. Does the Supreme Court have powers to formulate and allocate votes as election results?

2. Were the said results certified by INEC as required by law?

3. Did Hope Uzodinma call 388 witnesses from the 388 polling units to speak to the results to obviate the principle of dumping which the Supreme Court used against the PDP and her candidate, Atiku Abubarka, in the last Presidential Appeal.

4. Were the presiding officers and or party agents of the 388 polling units called to testify by Uzodinma/APC, who were the Petitioners?

5. What are the figures from each of the various 388 polling units generated and allocated to Hope Uzodinma/APC by the Supreme Court?

6. Is the Supreme Court saying that all the votes from the alleged 388 polling units were for the APC alone in an election that was contested by over 70 candidates?

Read the ruling oga.

All your questions were captured there. In your number 6 question it states that the appellant (Hope) scored an OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of the votes from the 388 initially cancelled polling units.

I am sure you know what overwhelmingly means

gidgiddy:
In other words, INEC has to prove its own results

Exactly. Since they called it fake then they should produce their own copies.

They could not and this then proves that the one they called fake is actually real because they knew it would not contradict what they already had

Racoon:
And the summation of counted votes overwhelmingly supersedes the number of accreditated voters?

Not the focus of the ruling neither was it the focus of the appeal.

Racoon:
Yes he may be detailing but what he posted tells you a lot about the mentality of the people leading Nigeria as a nation.After the fulani CJN as for more sharia inclusion in the secular Nigerian constitution.What do you have to say about that-and you not ashamed of him?

He derailed simple. This has nothing to do with Fulani after all both people who took each other to court are Igbo seeking redress for injustice meted on them and not about anything Fulani.

And oh you do realize that Hausas/Fulani also formed PDP right?

Mashallah:
Why?


It's part of my contribution to the thread,

The thread is not about Fulani but about a Court ruling. You broke the rules

Racoon:
https://www.farooqkperogi.com/2020/01/imo-judicial-abracadabra-and.html?m=1#.XiJ_Dz71hGU.twitter

The ruling had nothing to do with vote counts but omitted results. Learn about Judicial relevance before you continue typing your rubbish.

Nobody filed an appeal for a vote recount. What was filed was on omission of results and that was the focus of the ruling.

Wailing zombie do you get it now?

Racoon:
[s][/s] Your warped sense may accept it but I refused to be a zombie.Holla if you feel me.

Can you then fault the judgement?

Clearly state your objections wailing zombie

berrystunn:
IMO is IMO
Same people, same way of life.
What's my business?

So you are not from Imo yet you carry their wahala for head? Chai

[quote author=Racoon post=86068746][/quote]You should know that absolutely nothing you eventually post would contradict such an academic ruling by the Supreme Court.

This ruling was too simple and justifiably ruled

FINALLY