₦airaland Forum

shadeyinka:
They didn't o!
0
Zero count for each one of the parties

shadeyinka:
You state it!
Difficult to say hence you push the whole bible to read from Genesis to Revelation

OgundeleT:
Check the judgment and see yourself that PDP have more than 1k votes in those polling units.

shadeyinka:
I can agree (for the sake of argument) that INEC was compromised by the PDP. Hence, someone or groups within INEC must be prosecuted for compromising the election.

Whose duty is that?

Neyoohpompy:
Summary of the Ruling:
(1) PDP failed to work with INEC.
(2) APC colluded with some INEC ofiicials to produce a fake result from the 388 PUs.
(3) INEC knowing fully well their abracadabra, they failed to tender any documents in Court
(4) Justice kekere-Ekun was confused and baffled about Inec decisions not to tender results.
(5) Justice Kekere-Ekun mistook lower court decisions to be mis-carriage of Justice and ruled otherwise
(6) Justice kekere-Ekun is still confused as I am typing

DMerciful:
Do you know why Nigeria has not grown? Injustice! When it suits us we support injustice but when it doesn't suit us we cry. In your heart you know Uzodinma did not win the election but you are supporting technicality. Continue!
100% Igbo and you appreciates injustice? Check your ancestry, you are not Igbo!

shadeyinka:
Sorry, that's not they way it went. If it is, what was
1. The response of INEC?
2. The response of PDP?

shadeyinka:
The constitution of Nigeria empowers INEC to conduct elections. If INEC now failed to justify their countings, they should be forced to do that or someone prosecuted for distorting the fidelity of electoral result.

It is either that
INEC is compromised or
The Supreme Court is compromised.

Either way, someone must be brought to book

shadeyinka:
Whose result really should be believed
1. APC's
2. PDP's
3. INEC's

The results of INEC are like legal tender.

Let's Assume I printed fake Naira currency and CBN for one reason or the other decided to keep quiet and not give required evidence. Does that make my money a legal tender?

redsun:
The judgement is myopic. If inec that is the sole authority responsible for the election does not have a conclusive result then obviously the election should be declared null and void. Nobody should win until a fresh and impartial election is conducted.

Meanwhile, some inec animals should be held accountable criminally for conducting and declaring a rogue election. The consequences of what happened there is enormous, but because rigging is normal in Nigeria, the fcking judges can't see beyond handing it over to the one that has concocted evidence.

shadeyinka:
No sir!
The Supreme Court cannot accept the result from either APC or PDP as valid because they are not INEC.
The supreme court should have forced INEC to bring the results even if it was cancelled as evidence.

shadeyinka:
The loophole in their Judgement is just too glaring. They could have ordered for a re-run of the election

berrystunn:
They gave there reason to favour APC
Will they favour PDP if the case was the other way around.?

ZombieHUNT:
Buhari is a disaster

DMerciful:
If it was clear justice, why all the controversies? Justice should not only be done but seen to be done. You remember Osun election? What was supreme court judgment?
When we support injustice, let's not forget what goes around comes around. I hope you're not Igbo because Igbos believe in equity and justice!

sanpipita:
Lol did you hear yourself DCP tendered a sign results means they are authentic? How many police testified unit by unit that this results were excluded, go and read this same supreme court judgement on atiku and buhari and feel ashamed, how come burden on proof is suddenly on INEC and Ihedioha? how come this excluded results had only APC signature, let stop making excuses for bad behavior.

jcross19:
you are putting up these figures the same the crook did his own aid by terrorist president that want turmoil in the East and am sure God will disgrace him with his prophet of Baal mbaka.

DMerciful:
Do you believe in all honesty that Uzodinma got those votes considering the infighting of APC at the time and the dislike of APC by SE?

DMerciful:
What about AA votes, Nwosu is from Orlu and he got substantial votes?

sanpipita:
Its confirmed supreme court has no shame, are they not they ones who rules evidences must be fact based not on hearsay, here they are admitting an evidence of 388 units with just 25 witnesses, no shame

DMerciful:
You cannot give justice by creating mathematical impossibility. It means the 'justice' is built on lies hence injustice! Both parties presented their evidences but a simple way to know someone is not saying the truth is when figures don't add up.Supreme Court has sealed their name in shame because upcoming generations will know that supreme awarded a victory were valid votes were more than accredited voters!

Leo3333:
Did INEC ever say it omitted any result?
Even if they did, does it make any sense to you that every single eligible voter opted for the APC?

Please quit defending this glaring robbery.

NORSYK:
You and I know that those polling units are ghost units, how could Uzodinma have defeated nwosu in his strog hold like Orlu, Nkwere, Isu, Nwangele, Njaba and Orsu?
Okorocha was in full control of his Ideato south and north, Irona was in full charge of his Oguta and Ohaji.
Uzodinma was only in control of his Oru east and west

GoodGovernance:
Trash.


The only way you prove that a result sheet was fake,is by providing documentary evidence of the original or a valid report of cancellation,not by mere saying it is fake.

A mere denial by INEC can only be accepted by a compromised lower court,not the Supreme Court!


I sense a grand conspiracy between INEC and PDP/Ihedioha.

socialmediaman:
I’ll reply to this though I’ll report it for the needless provocation. I wonder the kind of people on here sometimes

Anyway, what happened to the onus when Atiku presented all the evidence and much more against the tyrant? Even if the judgement went against APC you guys will still agree with it, anywhere belle face

NORSYK:
OK sir, but you know I'm telling you the truth.
Okorocha and nwosu were in full control of orlu zone during that election, Uzodinma was like orphan in orlu zone then

NgeneUkwenu:
Let's even assume that INEC pleaded "damage" and it was accepted by the court....Then INEC should ordered a rerun in those areas rather than declare IHEDIOHA winner when the the total number of cancelled votes were higher that the margin between the Winner and the Losers?

Do you honestly believe INEC didn't know what they did in Imo State?

NgeneUkwenu:
It is settled in law that before you can label a document forged, the original must be shown and demonstrated....

Remember INEC Never argued that election did not take place there.

There was never a publication that the votes were cancelled...

If INEC claimed they cancelled, that means Ihedioha was not validly elected because the total number of cancelled votes was higher than the difference between the Winner and the losers..

So what did INEC do: They cleverly refused to collate the results from those areas Uzodinma won in Orlu Zone, because they had a deal to return IHEDIOHA as Governor..

Supreme Court is not a Father Christmas that will cancel and order rerun when neither of parties asked for it...

Uzodinma asked to be returned as duly elected, INEC and Ihedioha asked for dismissal of the case...

Did you learn anything now?

NORSYK:
Uche nwosu was way popular and accepted in orlu zone than Uzodinma, plus Okorocha's incumbency, there's no way Uzodinma could have won any other lga outside his oru east and west in orlu zone