₦airaland Forum

CanadaOrBust:
INEC, who supposedly issued the documents, said the documents were inauthentic!
The least you could do was at least EXAMINE the documents for abnormalities before rushing ahead to
take the extreme step of replacing a seating governor with the appellant based solely on those same clearly questionable, uncollaborated, unexamined documents supplied solely by the appellant!

CanadaOrBust:
You attempt to authentic a document by EXAMINING the document for abnormalities. The body who supposedly issued the document had sworn it was not authentic. ALSO you take into account that accepting the documents makes for impossible math.

Replacing a seating governor is an extreme step. You don’t undertake it based on clearly questionable documents produced by the beneficiary!

CanadaOrBust:
I read the judgement. No where does it say that any attempt was made to establish the authenticity of the documents even when INEC (who supposedly issued them) had clearly stated they were not authentic AND it was clear that including them would make for impossible math!

CanadaOrBust:
Mention another instance in Nigerian judicial history where the SC ruled against all lower courts AND INEC itself in other to immediately remove a seating governor - all based on clearly questionable, uncollaborated, and unauthenticated documents supplied solely by the plaintiff himself!!

CanadaOrBust:
As a disinterested, nonpartisan party, I render the final and honest opinion:

The Supreme Court has partisan bias

If the governor were APC they would not have so promptly removed him. The worst they would have done was order a re-run. And they would base that decision on those same reasons the respondents presented.

tomakint:
You mean INEC connived with PDP the opposition party in an APC stronghold where an incumbent APC Governor was commandeering? honestly speaking I don't know how you APC dudes do it but I must confess you guys are very irritating and purely demonic. You lie more than demons

Deepthoughts:
now it appears we are on same page,you don't expect inec to present what they were required to, that's why I expected the supreme Court to have asked inec to explain why they omitted the results from the 388units,a news piece I read some days back showing the new supreme Court judgement results clearly showed massive over voting that one wonder whether the supreme took notice of that at all,most surprisingly neither the supreme Court not inec is coming forth with the latest results, which ever way I try to look at the whole thing, it's still clear that the court messed up,the best was to have cancelled the whole election but something tells me the whole drama is all about Apc gaining ground in the SE by whatever means.

Obec70:
Between INEC & SUPREME COURT who has the right to accredit voters? How many voters are allowed in each polling unites? So policeman is now an INEC official? Who cross examined the so-called policeman? Is Supreme Court saying they are in Imo State did there own accreditation separately? & that 1+5 is no longer 6 but 9?
Senseless & unreasonable judgment, anyway if Rochas will be in the senate despite all that happened, anything else can happen!

Monday60655:
Op you are the most stupid and niccocompus ever existed. How can one person be punished for election that was keenly contested by over 70 participants if as INEC/ FG compromised as they did. How will all the unknown results from 388 go to APC and Uzodimma alone who even came fourth during the election. What happened for rerun as usual. Make I know just remember you now. I don't want to talk much.

Deepthoughts:
it's like you have compression issue,if truly there was no violence, rigging or any electoral malpractice whatsoever,then why did inec cancelled the results?,at least even for record purpose the supreme Court should have inquired from inec,or are you telling me now that inec just forgot about results from 388 polling units?,haba Mr Man.!

powerkey:
The person you quoted is a Democrat.

US Democrats are demonic, paedophiles , senseless and egocentric.

They are all Satanists and they know the whole world knows them very well.


Trump is going nowhere..

Deepthoughts:
No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.No matter how hard the supreme Court may try,the truth still remains that they Bleep up big time,ok the rules require that results should be cancelled at polling unit only,but if the supreme Court had carefully analysed their re computed results they would have seen that the results clearly showed gross over voting,ballot stuffing n rigging, with poor security at the polling unit it will be suicidal for any electoral officer at that level to cancel any result with devilish thugs threatening,the best the supreme Court should have done was to cancel the Imo elections in part or wholly but they had to satisfy the powers that be n so they had to source for this justification,now the supreme Court had only confirm that a politician should do whatever it takes to make sure that an election result is produce at the polling unit n such politician is good to go, I'm surprised that the supreme Court never mentioned anything concerning inec reason for the cancellation,the reason given by the supreme Court is just an after thought that doesn't hold any water, shame on them n their supporters.

redsun:
If the inec returning officer does not have a clear and conclusive result as it turned out to be, then how can the election be authentic? Who are they believing, the appellant's claim that is inconclusive or the overall result of the election of that state that does not exist as now know?

The true losers n this case are the suffering people. Both parties are gangs of robbers, I don't support them, but cases like these are opportunities to correct the ills that are keeping the country in the dark age.

ZombieHUNT:
Ruga terrorists everywhere

Amotekun is here to bury terrorists

adanny01:
I think it is the other way round.

INEC, PDP and the Ihedioha lawyers all could not produce one single result sheet. It tells me they colluded to manipulate the result and were afraid to present it to the supreme court so that they will not be found guilty of tampering with the results.

redsun:
I thought they were supposed to use their intellectual discretion and high moral standards to do things right and guide the country in the right direction.

A normal child that is being brought by normal adult/s in a normal society where reasons prevail can make a better judgement.

redsun:
What were the judgements of the lower courts? And how did they arrive at that?

The supreme supposedly being the highest order of sanity in the ailing country should be in a better position to know that it was a rogue election with no certified winner since the electoral body does not have a conclusive result. All they have done is give credibility to rigging by not pointing out the obvious and it is very worrying.

OgundeleT:
Don't mind him. I don't know how one will not be bold enough to say I belong to so so party when no one will kill you. The guy is just like the so call cashtivist we have after Gej lost election

shadeyinka:
I aren't a psychofanic personality like you. I don't subscribe to either APC or PDP.

Go make your noise somewhere else.
"Four legs good: two legs bad"

DesChyko:
You can call it a trap to attempt to wriggle out of the knot you got yourself into but even the blind could see the banner your cohorts did using 'Paint' on a PC, claiming that my LGA couldn't get up to 30000 voters accredited. You came across as one who could pinpoint the source, but I guess the apple never falls far from the tree.
As a statistician by profession, I was interested in seeing the source that will solidly claim it was impossible for Ihedioha to get an average of 200 votes per PU in the entire densely-populated Ahiazu-Mbaise LGA which has well over 140 PUs. Even the PU in my clan, which was under Oru-na-Lude, one of the smallest wards in Ahiazu were getting about 300 voters in total.


INEC are supposed to be the only body to verify the existence of such a document. If they rejected the initial document, for reasons best known to them, I wonder who else is empowered to enforce those documents as being valid.

shadeyinka:
No, that wasn't an answer.
It's like asking you a question in the court and you say "all the evidence are already submitted my Lord!"

shadeyinka:
I asked you two simple questions

shadeyinka:
Either way it goes, INEC was compromised. Someone must be made to account for it. That is my position.

shadeyinka:
The truth is simply stated.

DesChyko:
Can we have official verification of this claim?
I am from Mbaise. Ahiazu-Mbaise to be precise. I'm interested in the number of accredited persons in my LGA.