Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 12:37pm On Jan 26, 2020 |
Dadaboy: Especially because no one has a proof of such existence or not. And none has proof of such not existing either |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 12:36pm On Jan 26, 2020 |
Dadaboy: Look at the above ignorant mentions you made of me
I am just really angered that when someone is trying to explain something to you. Instead of reasoning and making research, you want me to tell you something that requires a broader look into. Something Wikipedia will assist you more on because it can easily link you to all the basis and foundation is what you want me to explain for you.
Do you think i read and make researches to stay in your level of intellectualism ? Wait wiki what?  You do realise that Wikipedia is self edited right? You have been of low IQ all along and just felt that if you kept on yelling that everyone else has a low IQ that would make you appear smarter  Get the fvck out of here doofus |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 12:33pm On Jan 26, 2020 |
Dadaboy: When they say take your time to study and read, you prefer to play and read one useless book and think you are doing it right.
I avoid people of low IQ like plaque. Y’all should not mention me anymore because i can see your level of intellect already But here you are among people of presumed low IQ trying so hard to frolick with them  Ain't life a bed of lonely dumbness for you. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 12:29pm On Jan 26, 2020 |
Dadaboy: What does mind your business got to do with your public display of deception and foolishness You just described yourself. I am glad you got my message |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:33am On Jan 26, 2020 |
CanadaOrBust: Forget this particular case. Look at the big picture. This is also your country.
WHAT CAN WE DO TO MITIGATE THE PRECEDENT SET BY THIS HORRIBLE JUDGMENT?? You are hell bent on continuing with these your obtuse posts. The judgement was just and extremely good. Next time any other litigant would ensure they have all documentation ready even if INEC does not have or refuses to present their own. There were 3 people involved in this case and not just Uzodinma vs INEC. It was UZODINMA vs INEC/IHEDIOHA so even if INEC refuses to present, IHEDIOHA should have presented and then INEC would be on the hot seat Justice knows how to balance itself. Enjoy your Sunday filled with HOPE  |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 11:24am On Jan 26, 2020 |
Dadaboy: There is almost nothing beautiful about Religion. apart from the continuous deceptions, Prejudice, Illusions, chaos, undevelopement and foolishness it brings
Let me explain this way.
The reason you believe so much in God is because, by default, the mentality of humans has been altered to believe there a supernatural being up somewhere. (Including myself born into a Christian home till i found redemption)
If you choose to stop being the ignorant person, you would take your time (even if years) to understand the whole theory about life and how humans created God because they had no explanations or understanding how the world evolved.
[b]As a Geographer and anthropologist, i will not waste my time on religious mentions because it’s almost impossible to explain to people who have had a wrong perception and believe for a donkey years Yet you just posted this and by the way in that cacophony of confused brain in your head have you ever heard the term "MIND YOUR BUSINESS"? Nobody solicited for words from you and even your own conscience is in a battle of control over showing your foolishness or your confusion or both |
Christianity Etc › Re: Christians Sold American Church To Muslims, Rejected Club Owners' Offer by Blindersoff: 11:21am On Jan 26, 2020 |
CAPSLOCKED: Its good to see these two brothers-in-arm getting along with each other.
Like I once said.. Christians and Muslims, you are one. You all have to stop fighting each other. You need to embrace each other like one large congregation of gullible, directionless herd of cattle that you truly are, which neither know what they're doing or where they're going. 
Senseless post that only shows your evil nature and Godless personality. Your hatred may be higher than Everest but is still far shorter than love |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:16am On Jan 26, 2020 |
[s] CanadaOrBust: garfield1, Blindersoff, Olaolufred, Agboriotejoye
Something just occurred to me! HOW COULD WE HAVE MISSED THIS?! Here it is:
SC just handed INEC (and by proxy any ruling party, which is who usually controls INEC) the power to rig any election with impunity. ALL THEY DO IS REFUSE TO PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS OF THE AREAS WHERE THEIR CANDIDATE RIGGED. And just like that their candidate’s fake result sheet must be accepted no matter how outrageous it is! Which means he can become the winner even if he came 10th!!
That will invariably lead to a one-party state!
Do we now see how this judgment is not just bad but quite dangerous??!! [/s] Spewing trash does not make you sensible. Justice cannot be Hoodwinked. Enough of your senselessness please. Headaches are real |
|
Politics › Re: Princess Miriam Onuoha: APC Wins Okigwe North Federal Constituency Rerun by Blindersoff: 7:40am On Jan 26, 2020 |
Otito diri Jesu for this landslide victory. Ndi wailers ntooor!  Democracy abago red okwaya?  Ndiara biko front page |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Threatening A Damaging New Trade War With The United Kingdom After Brexit by Blindersoff(op): 8:36pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
|
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 7:55pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
CanadaOrBust: Maybe u missed this:
Any unbiased person with a robust sense of fairness would have a problem with this SC ruling.
BOTTOM LINE - You don’t lightly remove a gov and hand the seat to a person that came fourth in the election. If u must do so make sure the documentary basis for your action are authenticated, collaborated, totally above board, and beyond reproach! In this case not only do the documents (which are the ONLY basis for the judgment) look totally faulty, INEC itself swore they were inauthentic. PLUS, adding figures from them would make for quite ridiculous electoral totals!
That ought never be the basis for immediate replacement of a gov by a 4th place finisher!
THAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE.
Nice chatting with y’all! You can lightly remove a sitting Governor when those meant to defend their crown as the sitting Governor cannot do something as simple as produce evidence to that effect despite being the umpires of same election. Actio non datur non damnificato INEC and IHEDIOHA together injured themselves. |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 7:29pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
CanadaOrBust: Once again, an electoral body swore in court that certain documents supposedly issued by it were inauthentic. NOT ONLY THAT, the documents themselves truely looked incomplete and inauthentic. NOT ONLY THAT, figures from said documents would make for funny electoral totals. YET, without even cursory examination of said documents and based SOLEY on them, the SC promptly sacked a sitting gov and replaced him by the man who came up with the said clearly questionable documents and who came FOURTH in said election!
And you see nothing wrong with that??
According to you the only way is for INEC to produce the originals. So from now on the only way INEC can prove they never issued a document is to produce the original. That makes sense to you bah? I don't know why you are blindly arguing a judgement whose simplicity can be seen even from space. The judgement has been delivered and the only 2 sides which stayed on the side of the law were the Supreme Court and hope Uzodinmas counsel. The counsels of INEC and PDP were monumental flops and legendary móròns. If you still wish to lament and cry then go ahead but know that tears cannot erase or reverse a Supreme Court Judgement credibly given. Have a great weekend......HOPEFULLY  |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Threatening A Damaging New Trade War With The United Kingdom After Brexit by Blindersoff(op): 1:45pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
englishmart: Only a select few hate Trump. We real Americans love Trump. Trump is making our great America great again Trump till Buhari leaves office. 53% of Americans hate Trump 62% Republicans want evidence and witnesses called into the Trump Trial In all the world Trump is considered the biggest threat to world Peace at over 40% rating as a bad leader |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Threatening A Damaging New Trade War With The United Kingdom After Brexit by Blindersoff(op): 1:42pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
hopexter: Take this your unwanted comment to a US forum  They will skin him alive there since he feels most Americans love Trump |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Threatening A Damaging New Trade War With The United Kingdom After Brexit by Blindersoff(op): 1:00pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
CSTR2: I said it before. UK has isolated themselves. That is why they support Trump in every way.
And Trump is going to use them so hard they would cry.
[s]Trump is a great leader. Boris Johnson is not[/s]. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Threatening A Damaging New Trade War With The United Kingdom After Brexit by Blindersoff(op): 12:42pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
ynotsadeek: This is what Nigeria should be doing too. As the biggest market in the sub-sahara region, we should be negotiating better deals with the UK for ourselves, we have better leverage now as they need us more than we need them.
One can only hope our leaders have the foresight to do the right thing and seize the opportunity. We are already doing this |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 12:39pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Yes!! Good!! That's what I want to hear. By what you have said now, it means people don't need to write waec anymore. Just register online, find your way to Oluwole and Kaboom you have an incontrovertible result.
Do you realize though that there are people in this country who actually do that and are working with those certificates. By this landmark judgments, all these fake WAEC have become new. All thanks to Tanko and APC zombies. *Facepalm* If this is what you could deduce from what the guy you quoted said then you have really wailed your intelligence away. Very sad |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 12:35pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: If you say INEC is complicit, I will agree with you.
But if you say mere showing 358/366 by Uzodinma is acceptable even when INEC that has the power to declare results say it is false is good enough, I say no. That a result is fake does not mean it should have a genuine as oluwole has shown us. INEC said the result is fake. Only the police and Uzodinma have the result. If you allege there is a collusion between INEC and Ihedioha, I can also allege there is a collusion between Uzodinma and the Police. But... the result was not signed by the PU officers! The figures don't add up!! There are no other parties with figures in the result!!! No incidence form, no EC8B with INEC. Definitely, something is amiss and my gut tells me Uzodinma wrote those results himself. INEC seeing it rejected it since it was not signed by their PU officers.
INEC should have ordered a rerun no doubt. But their failure to do that does not automatically authenticate the results that only Uzodinma and the police have. Just as INEC can't rob IUzodinma to pay Ihedioha, the court can't rob Ihedioha to pay Uzodinma!! The absolute power to disprove Uzodinma and the police combined rested on INEC squarely as the umpire. They had the yam and the knife but could not even do something as simple as that as the body all original electoral materials come from. If Uzodinma wrote those results himself why then did INEC not show proof that elections did not hold in the PUs? Did they? If they did, the judgment in full is in the OP so kindly show me. This then implies that the elections did hold in the PUs cancelled and if it did hold and the other agents refused to sign it could also be because they felt the margin was too high which in this case was understandable because those where Uzodinmas strongholds. The bottom line here is that INEC had no right to declare IHEDIOHA winner in the absence of results from 388 PUs as they claimed they had none in their possession. By law they should have demanded for a rerun. The fact that they still went ahead to declare IHEDIOHA winner in the light of all this clearly shows they were working for IHEDIOHA and PDP in IMO state because there is no rational behind that declaration. The Police and Uzodinma were not asked to show the documents were fake but the very umpire of the elections were asked to do so and this means the case was very much against Uzodinma yet INEC could not prove or disprove anything and despite this they had gone ahead to declare someone winner of an inconclusive election? If your gut still tells you Uzodinma colluded with the police and wrote the results when Inec also had recourse to incidence forms and counter evidence as the umpire then your gut needs purging. |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 12:17pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Na wa o Did you go to school at all? An assumption that elections held by the court does not imply that it held indeed. Where is it written that INEC admitted that elections held . You need to go back to school 
INEC rejecting the results is already an implication that elections did not hold there or results were doctored dummy!! And you've been accusing people of being empty heads  In law silence is admission of guilt. If you are given the opportunity to prove your claim and you cannot do so in such a simple manner as submitting documents which should be in your possession then you have admitted guilt. If despite not having these documents you still went ahead to declare IHEDIOHA as the winner then you are also guilty of wrongful declaration in the absence of conclusive results. Was it the supreme Court who asked INEC to declare IHEDIOHA winner when they knew they did not have complete results? INEC cannot eat their cake and have it. They obviously had a deal with PDP regarding that election and it was to deliver IMO to them by any means. However thanks to checks and balances of the law, this deal eventually caved |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 12:10pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: See eehn, the mere fact INEC rejected those results means a re-run should be ordered in those PUs since INEC who are supposed to have the results claim not to have it and are saying those tendered by one of the contestants are false. What SC is indirectly accusing INEC of doing is colluding with PDP to rig which means INEC should be sanctioned. The problem we have in our legal system is that there is really no accountability for anything. Just imagine going to court and claiming an oluwole WAEC certificate is genuine. Imagine WAEC comes and says No it's fake. Then the court rules that since WAEC can't produce the genuine one, then oluwole remains genuine. The fact remains that only INEC through its PU officers are empowered to authenticate results just like WAEC. Allowing anyone else to procure and brandish results without authentication from INEC is opening the gate for fraud to become the norm in our system. The two best options the SC could have done was to call the PU officers to court to authenticate the results in defiance of INEC's position, or to order a rerun.
Any other thing is simply an invitation to anarchy. INEC cannot reject the results and still claim elections held in the PUs yet are unable to produce their own copies all at the same time. If I am to go by your logic then Why did INEC go ahead to declare IHEDIOHA as winner and not ask for a rerun? This still shows INEC was complicit and acted deliberately to steal the mandate from Uzodinma. They could not counter nor reject the fact that elections held in the PUs. Rather for both the elections holding or not holding in the PUs and contesting the results submitted by UZODINMA they kept quiet because they could not provide counter evidence in form of incidence form or copies of their own and in law, Pure and simple silence in cases when the silent person is bound in good faith to explain himself, in which case, silence gives consent. But no assent will be inferred from a man unless first he knows his rights and knows what he is doing and second, his silence is voluntary. Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit INEC gave consent to the fact that UZODINMAS submitted documents were authentic and that elections held in the entire 388 polling units. The law is simple! The law is Just When any person is accused of a crime, or charged with any fact, and he does not deny it, in general, the presumption is very strong that the charge is correct. iNEC were given the chance to deny it by presenting evidence but could not produce A SINGLE ONE yet you blame the SUPREME COURT? You do not know anything about the law |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 12:01pm On Jan 25, 2020 |
Olaolufred: They are those who made the white insults the black race. Go read, digest it, then come back to make an informed comments.
Alas, they won't. My brother to say I am disappointed at the way empty heads argue as if they even know what it is all about is an understatement |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:58am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Kindly show were INEC admitted that elections held in the PUs You can now go ahead and argue with your shadow
|
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:52am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Are you saying it's virtually impossible for results to be falsified as long as elections held?
INEC rejected the 388 results because they suspected them to be fraudulent since their PU officers' signatures as well as dat of other parties were missing on them. Uzodinma produced 358, police produced 366 but somehow conjured a total of 216k votes for the 388. SC accepted it. Who looks like an idiot in the above scenario? You still do not get it do you? Since INEC rejected them as fake what reason was given for the rejection especially since they already admitted that elections held in all 388 PUs? If the reason would have been malpractice or violence then why did they not issue an incidence form to this effect? Either way it was a lose lose to INEC. WHY ADMIT ELECTIONS HELD IN THE PUs yet claim the results presented are fake even when you do not have copies of your own? |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:39am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: I don't get you. Who mentioned vote count here? Are you saying SC are dummies who only look at what you push to them and not circumstances surrounding it? I've asked you. With what SC has done, don't you think an Oluwole certificate can now be admitted as genuine in court as long as WAEC can't tender anything to the contrary when we all know that oluwole most times don't have genuine copies?
I'm talking about the numbers not adding up you're talking about vote count. Na wa o. So numbers not adding up are not as a result of vote count right? Maybe it is as a result of biology. Wailer grow some much needed sense |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:37am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Read page 14 and 22. Only APC's agents signed the EC8B forms presented by Uzodinma. Even the PU officers did not sign them. That is the reason why INEC rejected them. But the SC said you don't need to call PU officers to authenticate result dat don't have their signatures and are only 366 instead of 388. You self reason am na. Though it may be hard being a.... y'know  Since INEC rejected them as fake why then could they not produce an incidence form stating that elections did not hold in the 388 PUs but they all agreed that elections held. Who then is the idiot? Definitely not the SC |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:20am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: It's obvious you didn't read what you pasted. The supreme court did not subpoena anybody. That was done at the trial court. The supreme court only held that 1. You don't need testimony of PU officers to prove that elections held 2. PPP1-PPP366 can be admitted since the burden of proving them false is on INEC and Ihedioha not on Uzodinma/APC who tendered them 3. Results tendered by police are admissible as evidence since they are at the PUs 4. You don't need to certify duplicate copies of the original
The DCP tendered PPP1-P366 while Uzodinma was only able to tender only 358 copies. Mind you Ihedioha also tendered forms EC8 series too. Supreme court is saying that he did not disprove the ones tendered by Uzodinma/Police.
You are also playing the same dumb game by the supreme court. One of the methods of satisfying elections is by the figures adding up. If the figures are discountenanced, how then are you able to expose cases of overvoting, not to talk of the fact that ballot box stuffing simply becomes fashionable. So, if the numbers are not the business of the SC, how did they know that adding 213k votes to Uzodinma will be sufficient to make him governor. Also, why did they ask INEC to check if the numbers of Matawalle were sufficient to make him governor in ths Zamfara matter and just declare him outright? You should have read what you pasted and made sure you understood before jumping in to argue. You are the one playing the dumb game by not realizing that the SC cannot dabble into what was not appealed before her. Did anyone appeal for a vote count or recount? Did INEC or IHEDIOHA appeal for such? If none did this then means it was not in contention between both parties thus not any business of the SC. The SC only attends to cases already handled by the lower courts and does not manufacture new appeals when the appellant or respondent have not tabled same before her Do you think the SC is a kangaroo court? I repeat read the attached
|
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:16am On Jan 25, 2020 |
walexbiz: Supreme Court is the one to answer for it since it took over the power of the INEC, of the Supreme Court had done due diligence in it's course of it's duty it would have stuck with the adjudication of the tribunal and appeal court but it chose to differ with them, therefore, the Supreme Court and the Nigerian Police force have a moral obligation to explain to Nigerians were the new figures came from since the figure didn't emanate from INEC On the contrary, INEC has the moral obligation to present to the general public the incidence form stating clearly why all votes from 388 PUs were cancelled. That is if they documented it. The judgement clearly stated it as HEARSAY as no document was provided to show why. This alone shows INEC was compromised by PDP. Also, INEC should explain to the general public how come UZODINMA and the POLICE have copies of these results from the PU yet PDP with party agents present did not have any to present and INEC also did not have original copies to present. And by the way, under electoral law the police are also meant to have their own copies for sake of accountability If there was violence, rigging or malpractice in those PUs which should explain why INEC and IHEDIOHA did not have their own copies, HOW COME THERE IS NO INCIDENCE FORM ATTESTING TO THAT? Do you see that the real riggers were INEC and PDP? |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 11:12am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Don't mind him. A result that only APC and the police have is genuine to the blindman. Just imagine the supreme court!! How can you say you need to call PU officers to prove there was no voting and violence or rigging but you don't need to call them to prove that results are genuine. Unbelievable!! None of this is the concern of the SC. Read the attached
|
Business › Re: Yusuf Fatai 'Oko Oloyun' Buried In His Hometown (Photos) by Blindersoff: 11:02am On Jan 25, 2020 |
espn: Death is inevitable until science proves otherwise.... Science cannot reverse death. Death is what brings life. Without death, life would eventually cease |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 10:58am On Jan 25, 2020 |
Agboriotejoye: Did you not read what you pasted? the documents were listed as PPP1-PPP3666 or are you just poor with numbers like our supreme court judges?
Let me tell you. The supreme court just opened a floodgate by turning itself to a results authentication body. Going forward, what anyone would need to do to win elections in Nigeria would be to get polling unit officers to write results for them and tender same in conjunction with our very corrupt police and tadaa, they are declared winners irrespective of any other thing including whether the numbers add up or not.
This is same as saying an oluwole certificate is genuine as long as WAEC cannot produce a "genuine" to the contrary while we know that most oluwole results don't have the genuine. Why didn't kemi go to court self about her NYSC matter Oh I forgot Tanko was not yet CJN then!! Someone should inform her she has a case now  The SC was not appealed to authenticate results but to reinstate results previously cancelled without an incidence form stipulating why they were cancelled. All they did was return results illegally cancelled and it was INEC and IHEDIOHA who claimed the results were fake thus crossing over into criminal grounds. The SC then asked for INEC and IHEDIOHAS own copies for sake of seeing if indeed the results UZODINMA tendered were fake. The SC also sent a subpoena to the DCP for their own copies. The DCP tendered theirs, it matched the copies UZODINMA submitted but INEC and IHEDIOHA could not submit even one copy of their own. WHY? Thus the SC had no choice but to rely on the sole evidence which was not contested by INEC or IHEDIOHA. How does this then amount to the SC authenticating documents when the body meant to authenticate the document in the person of INEC could not challenge it with documents of their own? Plus the numbers are not the business of the SC because that was not the appeal before her. If you read the judgement you would have seen the SC repeatedly state that their business was THE CRUX OF THE MATTER which is the appeal filed by UZODINMA and not voters count or numbers |
Politics › Re: Full Supreme Court Judgement On Imo Election. Pics by Blindersoff(op): 10:14am On Jan 25, 2020 |
[s] Agboriotejoye: This supreme court justices need to go back to primary school. How can 366 results be used to admit a figure of 310,225 from 388 polling units?
That alone should be enough to cancel the election cause even the appellant couldn't produce results for the whole 388 PUs. It's also obvious that the presiding officers did not sign those results which is why the trial and appeal courts rejected them. Only for the supreme court to accept them based on the fact that they are duplicates. Which kind madness be dat? [/s] Trash! It is actually 388 and not 366. Plus Uzodinma already had over 94,000 votes before the illegally cancelled results from 388 PUs were now included. So there was no 310k result from 366 PUs rather there was an additional 215k from 388 PUs Stop being blind and hard at learning |