₦airaland Forum

And Peter-Obi should continue with this nonsense back-and-forth bickerings for the next four years.??

Hmm.

Makoko..
Always forgotten.




Remembered only during elections.

mokafor:
https://www.thecable.ng/rewind-in-january-court-ruled-that-inec-can-use-any-method-for-results-transmission/amp

The Labour Party,, (that is, if they are truly wise), should just appeal this Judgement..

They should be defending their stand with Section-64; Sub-Section-(4)..



(And not Section-60; Sub-section-(2)..)

HydraFeeds:
Is INEC responsible for the upload ?

If not INEC,, then who should be responsible??

Is it Hackers??

Jokay07:
bluntcrazeman, your attention is needed here

Instead of you to answer my simple question inside the other uncrowded harmless thread,, you're here mentioning my moniker on another thread.

Nevertheless,, I will still respond to you..

Now..
Let me still drag you back to that same Electoral-Act-2022: Section-64; Sub-Section-(4);.(a-&-b)..

The words there are very clear.

We can all agree that the “Directly-Transmitted Results From The Various Polling-units”, as described inside the Electoral Act, could be done using any method on this earth, (be it “Optical-Fibre Transmission”, “Solar-Waves Transmission”, “Radio Transmission”, “Sonar Transmission”, and even “Seismic Transmission” too),, but definitely NOT “Manual Transmission”, because it wouldn't satisfy the expected requirements of the Electoral Act.


Section-64(4) of the Electoral Act simply maintains that, no matter the Method or Mode which INEC employed for the Transmission of the results (“Directly from the Polling-units”),, it MUST be completely done-and-dusted with before the Collations that are supposed to use the results from those polling-units would start.
This is because,, those directly transmitted results are the results which the Collation Officers at the various “WARDS COLLATION CENTERS” must use to satisfy the requirements of the Section-64(4) of the Electoral-Act-2022.



Therefore,, this particular Court-Ruling still didn't deflate my arguments..


Please read the Section-64; Sub-Section-(4):.(a-&-b) of the Electoral-Act-2022 again,, and explain it well to me,, just in case I am not understanding it very well..

Well-done

He should do more.

LocalStandard1:
I take that post back after the elections. Buhari is the biggest failure, fraudster, bigot and deceiver of modern Nigeria.

Ok Naa..

INEC no get Integrity Any Longer..

So Now......

Is the storage of data to the “BACK-UP” different from the “SYNCHRONISATION” which caused lots of wahalla In the Osun Election.??




Again,, the Storage of data to the BACK-UP can be monitored by the parties..

So, why wouldn't they do the BACK-UP already??
Before they can go ahead with their secret procedures of RECONFIGURATIONS.??

So Now......

Is the storage of data to the “BACK-UP” different from the “SYNCHRONISATION” which caused lots of wahalla In the Osun Election.??




Again,, the Storage of data to the BACK-UP can be monitored by the parties..

So, why wouldn't they do the BACK-UP already??
Before they can go ahead with their secret procedures of RECONFIGURATIONS.??

INEC REJECTS LP’S REQUEST TO WITNESS BVAS RECONFIGURATION.


The Labour Party, on Thursday, knocked the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), saying the electoral umpire deliberately came up with its idea of reconfiguring the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System machines after its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, sought to examine the election materials.

This was as the party faulted the commission’s claim of backing up the data retrieved from the BVAS without the presence of independent witnesses and representatives of political parties.

The protest is coming barely 24 hours after INEC rescheduled the planned governorship and states House of Assembly elections earlier slated for March 11 in order to reconfigure the BVAS machines.

The move was made possible after the Presidential Election Petition Court sitting at the Court of Appeal in Abuja granted the commission’s request to reconfigure the BVAS that were used for the presidential poll.

The court had, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel of Justices, dismissed objection by the LP and held that preventing the electoral umpire from reconfiguring the BVAS would adversely affect the forthcoming governorship and state Assembly elections.

But the Chief Spokesman for the Obi-Datti Presidential Campaign Council, Yunusa Tanko, reiterated that it was wrong of INEC to claim that it had backed up the data from the BVAS without any witness.

Tanko further accused the electoral umpire of constantly changing its rule of engagement to cover up some of the anomalies they earlier observed.

He said, “Are we privy or invited to see what was being backed up? If there is going to be transparency, what INEC needs to do is to invite everybody with their technological experts to see what the commission intends to back up from the original source. Was this done?

“We didn’t want to use that as evidence in the court of law. INEC should not forget that we also have our own results. Anything contradictory to that particular result and what they backed up will be totally unacceptable to us.

“It is clear right from the beginning that INEC deliberately went to court for reconfiguration of the BVAS machines after Obi requested to inspect election materials. Of course, nobody, not even you and I, know the commission can come up with anything like reconfiguration at this time. This was done after we demanded to inspect those machines.

“When you are going into an arrangement, it is always important to tell people about the rule of engagement and ensure you don’t change it. But INEC keeps on changing the rule of engagement in order to cover their shady deals. It is unfortunate that we have to bring INEC down to this particular level.”

While stating that they had lost confidence in the capacity of the commission to hold a free and fair election, the LP campaign spokesman noted that Obi was consulting with his lawyers to determine whether or not to appeal the court ruling on BVAS reconfiguration.

Tanko also warned the electoral body to endeavour to raise its standard and seek to do the right thing to avoid incurring the wrath of the masses.

Similarly, the Peoples Democratic Party expressed strong reservations about INEC’s capacity to conduct the upcoming governorship and Houses of Assembly polls in a free, fair, and transparent manner.

Speaking with The PUNCH, the National Publicity of the PDP, Debo Ologunagba, said the commission’s conduct in the past two weeks had made most Nigerians to doubt its sincerity.

He said, “The governorship and Assembly polls were to hold on March 11, according to INEC, knowing full well that they could not do it. Now, they have moved it to March 18. Why can’t they allow the parties who had got a court order to get that information from BVAS so that they can be sure of their integrity? Given the behaviour of INEC in recent weeks, how can we be sure that they can even conduct acceptable polls this time?

“This is about the integrity and believability of INEC. What is the average Nigerian saying about INEC today? From the behaviour and activities of INEC, during and after the election, it was clear they were not ready to walk their own talk.”

On assurances by the commission that data from BVAS would be secured in a back-end and cloud, and made accessible to the PDP at any time, Ologunagba said, “This election is technologically driven but today, INEC is on its own, deliberately sabotaging a process it promised the whole world it would sanitise.

“On Google, you would realise that there is possibility of losing data when saved in the cloud. There is the risk of losing data. So, if there is a risk of losing data, why is INEC not worried like the rest of us? How are we sure that this data will be preserved? This is the question we want INEC to answer.”

But reacting, the Chief Press Secretary to the INEC Chairman, Rotimi Oyekanmi, said the data back-up of the BVAS was an internal affair of the commission and not open to inspection by parties.

“The reconfiguration or data back-processes of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System machines is strictly an internal affair of the Independent National Electoral Commission, that no external eyes are allowed to witness.

“Of course, political parties are free to witness a test-run of the BVAS, and they did during the mock accreditation exercise that we carried out before the general elections.

“However, it is really, really curious that the Labour Party would express any desire to witness such an activity. What exactly do they want to see? Would the party also want to witness when ballot papers and result sheets are designed and printed?

“It is like students demanding to be present when their teachers are determining examination questions. While the commission appreciates and maintains a very cordial relationship with the Inter-Party Advisory Council, the boundaries are well defined and known to both parties,” Oyekanmi said.

Asked when INEC will complete the BVAS reset and storage of data in the back-up, Oyekanmi said “about three days.”

Source:
https://punchng.com/inec-rejects-lps-request-to-witness-bvas-reconfiguration

Hmm

LocalStandard1:
..

Buhari might leave office a celebrity of democracy, I think!!

OK

yaki84:
Orrrrr

Hehehehehe.

You people Seff..

iphanyiuma:
Op what if people just join in to corrupt the figures by imputing random figures how would it be verified

By random repetitions..


Wrong things cannot be entered coincidentally for up to three or four times.

yaki84:
Collate, announcr, correct and confirm....

Then transmit...

Is the transmission that is ur issue here.

Na the court go iinterpret that word for u.

Just Gettatt..!!




You didn't understand anything there..
“Correct and Confirm indeed”..


He doesn't even know where the word “Transmit” is supposed to fall in inside the whole text.





Just Gettat abbegg.!!

Ok ooo

yaki84:
There is nothing to explain here bro.

It is a very.simple and easy task...

Which TASK exactly you talking about here??


You still didn't read this small thing?
Or abi you didn't understand what you SAW.??

garfield1:
Prof Mahmoud doesn't take decisions,inec board as a whole takes the decision.inec has till 28 April to conduct all elections,obi has till till sept to prove his case.therefore,inec must take preeminence

You now see...



That INEC is the one who wouldn't want to extend the time to allow all processes to run smoothly as they are required...



Don't Blame Obi for that.

yaki84:
Present the act here lets read it together.

You actually quoted it in your response...


I don't want to believe that you didn't even read the post which you quickly rushed to comment on...
Or, didn't you read that post.??



LAZY NAIRALANDER.!!


Anyways,, I will oblige your request..


PLEASE READ THIS EXCERPT MORE THAN “TWICE” BEFORE DROPPING ANY COMMENT..

DON'T BE IN A HASTE TO COMMENT.. PLEEAASEE.!!

Section-64:
Sub-Section-(4) A collation officer or returning officer at an election SHALL collate and announce the result of an election, subject to his or her verification and confirmation that the—

(a) number of accredited voters stated on the collated result are correct and CONSISTENT with the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 47(2) of this Act; and

(b) the votes stated on the collated result are correct and CONSISTENT with the “votes or results” recorded and transmitted directly from polling units under section 60(4) of this Act.

garfield1:
Not on account of one man. conduct of elections is primary and supercedes any other private concerns.it comes first before obi's matter not forgetting that inec has a constitutional deadline to meet

Which Man.??

Prof. Mahmood.??


Because, you shouldn't be seeing Peter Obi here,, rather, you should be seeing court orders and court rulings...

The only “One Man” we should be talking about here is Prof. Mahmood.

Prof. Mahmood can shift the date to three weeks if he so desires.

yaki84:
So what did the electoral act say?

Transmit result electronically?

Whivh result, the one we voted manually using ballot papers?

Is it difficult to transmit manually voted results Electronically.??


Please Sir...
I want you to read the Electoral Act: Section-64:- Sub-Section-(4) (a-&-b)..

Please explain it to me in your own words..


I'm really beginning to feel like I really didn't fully understand what that part of the Electoral Act was saying..

HELP ME PLEASE..!!

You’ve asked me this very question more than 20 times..

garfield1:
True.but with guber elections looming,it is impossible

So,, Guber Elections cannot come after one Month.??

Babaken:
Is a big disgrace and shameful to the institution that decorate that mumudu as professor.

Let's Talk about the Mammud later..


Right now,, there is work to be done...

Work which the PRESIDING OFFICERS didn't do.

garfield1:
Yes.at least he still has access to the requested data.moreover,he can still prove his case via other means

Well..


With the Osun experience,, it's far better to directly inspect the BVAS Machines..

yaki84:
All these are bullshits.

There r processes of collation of votes..

From polling units to ward collation centres to local govt collation centres to state collation which is then transmitted to the National collation centre.

All those sub collation centres r captured by inec guidelines in aarticle 8 and it aids in quick and faster mode of collating electoral results from the polling units.

If these results were to be directly sent to IREV, and eventuality occurs, do u know the entire processes would have to be cancelled and restart afresh?
Or like they r still uploading results till now, tht means we wwould have waited till now before knowing the winner or the presidential election.

Every party had agents in all these collation centres, if the result doesnt tally with what INEC declared, then present ur facts in court.

Stop all these shits

Oga Sir..



YOU'RE TALKING MEGA TRASH.!! 🗑️.!!


We are here dissecting about the Provisions of the Electoral Act (2022),, and you're talking about “INEC GUIDELINES”, and IREV.. and State Transmission..


All these nonsense you're blabbing here,, are they what the Electoral Act said.??

garfield1:
This ridiculous. who told you they stopped him? They said they needed to reconfigure the bvas immediately for the guber polls.granting obi access to bvas will delay the polls more than two weeks.

Obi will not physically inspect the BVAS Machines..

He will now have to depend on the CTC copies that would be sent to him.

Wait oo..


Someone would now head back to court and file for the same case, but this time, in a representative capacity..



And BOOMMM.!!

Goke7:
good, then stop disturbing everywhere with this transmission nonsense and wait for the courts

Wait..



What I typing online is actually causing the country to be ungovernable??


Like seriously??

Why is it paining you this much sef.??

garfield1:
Wahala go dey.even your lp wanted to access the info on the bvas before inec transfers it to their server.the osun elections has clearly shown that getting info from server is a complicated matter,it is better you get it directly from the bvas.bvas is original, primary unlike the secondary data from server

So,, why didn't the INEC allow Peter Obi to get the Original Data from the BVAS.??
Why are they in such a rush to tamper with the BVAS.??
Where exactly are they rushing to.?

Why are they even referring him to the server.,, Rather than the original BVAS Machines themselves.??