BluntCrazeMan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BluntCrazeMan's Profile › BluntCrazeMan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 (of 554 pages)
Assault... Physical Assault.. .. She dare raised her hand.... |
redsun:That's just it.. And if the Constitution is reviewed, it won't still be put to work. .. People are shouting that this present Constitution should be thrown out, and a new one should be written. But they have not even obeyed up to 20% of what was written inside this current Constitution. |
adioolayi:The NBC rules will definitely be stronger than Nairaland rules naa |
Amotolongbo:This analogy is One Million.!! |
Multiple fake accounts would be detected and quickly deactivated.. |
Please, I want to know. The FG Suspended Twitter, and mandated the NBC to regulate the Social Media. .. And here is Nairaland. What would happen to Nairaland.?? |
kinzation:You support the saying that: “rigging electronically voted elections is very very easy”?? |
Nbote:That's it. There shouldn't also be “Office of the wife of the president”. I mean, what's the constitutional functions and obligations of such Offices? And the offices shouldn't be accommodated officially within the Official Space of the Presidency (or the Governor). .. I see States having “Office of the wife of the State Governor” situated inside the official premises of the Government House |
The Nigerian Constitution did not support the “Office of the First Lady”, neither did any of the “Acts” or “Official Gazettes” support it. Not even a single State-law supported such positions for the whole of the 36 States. .. Even if they change it to “Office of the Wife of the President” or ”Office of the Wife of the State Governor”, that does not still make it a part of the “Office of the Presidency” or “Office of the State Governor”. .. The Constitution Review is currently ongoing, and none of the numerous aides of these wrongly-placed women/wives came out to make their own inputs as regards to the constitutional provisions of the offices of their principals. |
Odunolumide:If it was Suspended, what difference would it had been from the banning? |
But my Twitter is still working, mbok.!! |
buckeyemedia:You just talked about yourself. So, Get Lost...!! And Goodbye |
Your Son “Osunbade” is also part of the problems in Nigeria. |
In My Own Opinion, These Two Things Are Urgently Needed In All Our Future Elections. 1. Electronic-Voting: (Whether Full or Partial implementation of the Electronic-Voting). Whichever options that INEC decided to opt for, they should ensure that the “Accreditation of Voters”, the “Transmission of the Results”, and the “Collation of the Results at the various levels of collation” are Fully Electronic and Automatic, and let all of them be done Real-time - that is: Let them be done right in-front of everybody, and not to be kept-away for it to be done sometime later. 2. Immediate Publishing Of Results: Let the Collated Results of all the Wards and LGAs “Collation Centres” be also made immediately available on the “Online Results-Viewing Portal” (in addition to the “Polling-units Results” that had always been made available on the Portal) |
Lalasticlala, Seun |
Lalasticlala, Seun |
Sunofgod:Please answer this question below: You see..., whenever “Electronic-Voting” is being mentioned, a lot of people would say that hackers would just hack the servers and manipulate the figures in their own favour, or in the favour of those who engaged them. .. And my question now is: Since the servers that would collate the “Number of Accredited Voters” are all totally different from the servers that would collate the “Votes Results”, and all these are all totally different from the servers that would collate the “Cancelled Polling-units and their corresponding number of registered voters”; I want to know exactly how these so-called hackers can actually change the “Votes Results” that are contained inside a particular server and at the same time change all the other corresponding values of the “Accredited Voters” that are contained inside another server entirely. https://www.nairaland.com/6586592/how-perfectly-concealed-rigged-electronically-voted#102365872 |
kinzation:Make we watch them naa.. They may be serious this time ooo. |
Built2last:How Can The Election NOT Hold?? Eehhnn?? Answer Me. How can the Election Not Hold? |
BluntCrazeMan:If the “Results Collation” is done electronically, how on earth can there ever be human “disruptions” to the supposed electronic process?? NONSENSE INEC..!! NONSENSE TALKS AS USUAL...!!!! |
“Use of technology has come to stay”, INEC tells election riggers. .. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Thursday declared the use of technology in the conduct of elections has come to stay around the world and therefore should be improved upon. He said Nigeria can’t afford to be left out if the activities of politicians with the intent of rigging the polls were to be put under check. INEC Chairman Prof Mahmood Yakubu stated this in Abuja while presenting a paper at the Blueprint’s 10th year anniversary and impact series/award. Represented by the agency’s Director of ICT, Chidi Nwafor, the INEC boss noted that the challenges with IT deployment could be overwhelming, especially for a vast country like Nigeria. He said technology was evolving and should therefore move with the trend to get the benefits therein. Yakubu said technology and processes were a major task in a technologically driven electoral process. He also said as a way of using technological innovation as antidote to election rigging, electronic voters registration has been conceived by the Commission and will be launched on the 28th of this month. “It is very important to always realise that technology may most times not give a full end-to-end solution, the people aspect need to be well handled. “The use of technology in elections has come to stay, especially in this part of the world, and therefore needs to be improved upon,” he said. On the way forward on the use of technology in the conduct of elections, the INEC boss said: “Deployment of technology has touched most of the election processes,” adding that INEC was working on the last part – deployment of Electoral Voting Machines (EVMs). He stated that “INEC is institutionalising the technologies through more research, developments and study tours, adequate training and staff development, calling for more support (funding) from government and international partners.” The commission also said a law should be made to support technology, rather than be a barrier while calling for “public enlightenment and more stakeholder engagements because having a free, fair and credible election – which is devoid of rigging, is a collective duty of all Nigerians.” The stakeholders, according to the chairman, were the voters, political parties and politicians, civil society organisations, the media, security agencies, INEC and its staff, amongst others. The INEC boss also highlighted areas technology cannot be applied, especially those beyond the reach of the commission to include “political party primaries and selection of candidates, disruptions to normal voting and results collation processes, security of men and materials as well as vote “buying” and “selling.” On overcoming the challenges of technology and data security, INEC chairman said the commission “is keen at ensuring the security of its data, networks and other infrastructure.” He noted that “several attempts have been made on INEC’s sites, portals, etc; and more will be made, especially as INEC deploys more of its infrastructure online to serve the people better.” He also called for more enforcement of the 2015 cyber crimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Act. The INEC boss also said the commission had applied technology so far in the “core processes in the electoral system which includes registration of voters, authentication of voters on election day, casting of ballots and collation of election results. Others are declaration of winners, voter registration, voter authentication, balloting, vote collation and vote transmission.” On the voter registration towards 2023 election, he said voter enrolment software would be introduced to recapture as much fingerprints as possible, using better fingerprint capturing software and hardware. This, he said, would conform in totality with the NIMC requirements for citizens’ registration; “With the plans to commence the use of electronic voting machine (EVM), it is important to update the register of voters to include additional biometric features like facials, as this will strengthen the integrity of the register,” Yakubu said. He also underscored “the need to have additional fields captured – like email addresses, disability status – for those who are living with disabilities,” stressing that all these necessitated the need for a new voter enrolment software. https://www.blueprint.ng/use-of-technology-has-come-to-stay-inec-tells-election-riggers/ |
“Use of technology has come to stay”, INEC tells election riggers. .. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Thursday declared the use of technology in the conduct of elections has come to stay around the world and therefore should be improved upon. He said Nigeria can’t afford to be left out if the activities of politicians with the intent of rigging the polls were to be put under check. INEC Chairman Prof Mahmood Yakubu stated this in Abuja while presenting a paper at the Blueprint’s 10th year anniversary and impact series/award. Represented by the agency’s Director of ICT, Chidi Nwafor, the INEC boss noted that the challenges with IT deployment could be overwhelming, especially for a vast country like Nigeria. He said technology was evolving and should therefore move with the trend to get the benefits therein. Yakubu said technology and processes were a major task in a technologically driven electoral process. He also said as a way of using technological innovation as antidote to election rigging, electronic voters registration has been conceived by the Commission and will be launched on the 28th of this month. “It is very important to always realise that technology may most times not give a full end-to-end solution, the people aspect need to be well handled. “The use of technology in elections has come to stay, especially in this part of the world, and therefore needs to be improved upon,” he said. On the way forward on the use of technology in the conduct of elections, the INEC boss said: “Deployment of technology has touched most of the election processes,” adding that INEC was working on the last part – deployment of Electoral Voting Machines (EVMs). He stated that “INEC is institutionalising the technologies through more research, developments and study tours, adequate training and staff development, calling for more support (funding) from government and international partners.” The commission also said a law should be made to support technology, rather than be a barrier while calling for “public enlightenment and more stakeholder engagements because having a free, fair and credible election – which is devoid of rigging, is a collective duty of all Nigerians.” The stakeholders, according to the chairman, were the voters, political parties and politicians, civil society organisations, the media, security agencies, INEC and its staff, amongst others. The INEC boss also highlighted areas technology cannot be applied, especially those beyond the reach of the commission to include “political party primaries and selection of candidates, disruptions to normal voting and results collation processes, security of men and materials as well as vote “buying” and “selling.” On overcoming the challenges of technology and data security, INEC chairman said the commission “is keen at ensuring the security of its data, networks and other infrastructure.” He noted that “several attempts have been made on INEC’s sites, portals, etc; and more will be made, especially as INEC deploys more of its infrastructure online to serve the people better.” He also called for more enforcement of the 2015 cyber crimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Act. The INEC boss also said the commission had applied technology so far in the “core processes in the electoral system which includes registration of voters, authentication of voters on election day, casting of ballots and collation of election results. Others are declaration of winners, voter registration, voter authentication, balloting, vote collation and vote transmission.” On the voter registration towards 2023 election, he said voter enrolment software would be introduced to recapture as much fingerprints as possible, using better fingerprint capturing software and hardware. This, he said, would conform in totality with the NIMC requirements for citizens’ registration; “With the plans to commence the use of electronic voting machine (EVM), it is important to update the register of voters to include additional biometric features like facials, as this will strengthen the integrity of the register,” Yakubu said. He also underscored “the need to have additional fields captured – like email addresses, disability status – for those who are living with disabilities,” stressing that all these necessitated the need for a new voter enrolment software. https://www.blueprint.ng/use-of-technology-has-come-to-stay-inec-tells-election-riggers/ |
In My Own Opinion, These Two Things Are Urgently Needed In All Our Future Elections. 1. Electronic-Voting: (Whether Full or Partial implementation of the Electronic-Voting). Whichever options that INEC decided to opt for, they should ensure that the “Accreditation of Voters”, the “Transmission of the Results”, and the “Collation of the Results at the various levels of collation” are Fully Electronic and Automatic, and let all of them be done Real-time - that is: Let them be done right in-front of everybody, and not to be kept-away for it to be done sometime later. 2. Immediate Publishing Of Results: Let the Collated Results of all the Wards and LGAs “Collation Centres” be also made immediately available on the “Online Results-Viewing Portal” (in addition to the “Polling-units Results” that had always been made available on the Portal) |
Webmasters And Coders In the House, please I need proper explanations on how this can ever be possible. .. You see..., whenever “Electronic-Voting” is being mentioned, a lot of people would say that hackers would just hack the servers and manipulate the figures in their own favour, or in the favour of those who engaged them. .. And my question now is: Since the servers that would collate the “Number of Accredited Voters” are all totally different from the servers that would collate the “Votes Results”, and all these are all totally different from the servers that would collate the “Cancelled Polling-units and their corresponding number of registered voters”; I want to know exactly how these so-called hackers can actually change the “Votes Results” that are contained inside a particular server and at the same time change all the other corresponding values of the “Accredited Voters” that are contained inside another server entirely. ... .. (If they couldn't take the pains to effect all the necessary changes in all the other servers, then the results-parameters would not add-up, and therefore the Election Results would be marred with so many errors, and should not be accepted.) ... I need answers to this question please. |
tk4rd:It should be going on by now, at this very moment. I've browsed seriously in order to find a way to participate virtually through online means, but I found none |
AGNESikpuNNU:This your Moniker sef.. E can scatter person head |
Seun |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 (of 554 pages)
