₦airaland Forum

No one distributes and profits from cocaine like the CIA.

Family business.

jamafa:
Wike is from Rivers state(PH) which is South-South. Is South-South not different from South East??

So you know this? Tell your map-drawing brothers too. You guys know how to make a distinction when it suits you. Stop claiming Ikwerre people. Thank you.

Sleekfingers:
I have already answered your first question

😂 Na wa o. Oya bye bye.

Sleekfingers:
So because I don't believe in that Jew clown called Jesus , that doesn't make me an atheist.....

It's a question. One of the two I asked. Are you going to answer them?

Sleekfingers:
Brainwashed individual spotted...... Jesus was nothing but a mortal being like you and I.......

Are you an atheist? No Christian with a fair understanding of the Bible will make such a comment. Away from that though, when I see people call others brainwashed, I usually want to know how truly aware they are by asking a simple question, which i hope you answer. Have humans been to the moon?

The best minister in this government. Reuben Abati is a joke.

Okjay:
You are still here? The ship has long sailed. What a pity?

Sailed to where? Ship of lawlessness.

Unfortunately, everything is on a lawless foundation, as he is still operating without a budget. The lawlessness is what embarrasses me about my great state in the hands of Fubara. Present the budget to the legitimate house led by the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule.

Patriotic lad.

Kukutente23:
Lol

Join the profession indeed

Your profession is now dragging with police and Nepa in terms of most corrupt that NASS are even beginning to look like angels

I'll dabble into whatever I please come and beat me

You couldn't even put your teeth into the Rivers lawmakers since it conflicts with your initial puerile defence of the SC

Such a joke!!

It is a profession involved in the justice sector, so it is never an easy venture. Enormous responsibility. Aspersions will be cast, and I accept it is not perfect, likewise others, but you need to minimise the exaggerations and spurious allegations. Regarding putting my teeth into whatever you are going on about, you are one petty fellow. Does that also mean you will be going against your previous stance and supporting my position? Anyway, I have addressed that. It will also be resolved at the Supreme Court, and everyone, including you will accept it as final.

Religious intolerance.

Sad.

Kukutente23:
Lol
Rest
Lawyer indeed

You are really pained. If you want to join this profession, you know the process. Stop this your warrantless dabbling into legal issues.

bismarck:
The link you posted is a non-starter. You see, your mischief will always lead you to dabble into issues that you have zero understanding. I have no business talking with you from SW Nigeria about Ikwerre. The point is that no reasonable Ikwerre would DARE reference the report of Willink's Commission to support an ethnic identity separate from the Igbo. [/b] I await the original liar (Tranquill) if truly he is Ikwerre, to state anywhere in the entire report that 'Ikwerre representatives ' presented themselves as non-Igbos.

You are delusional. Ikwerres and other ethnic groups in Rivers State faced marginalisation and discrimination during regionalism, and have spoken about their bitter experiences. Those fears are resurrected every time mischievous, map-drawing elements deny them of their identity by relentlessly and desperately claiming that Ikwerres are Igbos.

Ikwerres have maintained they are not Igbos. You can't force an identity on someone. The fact that this is still in contention shows you some people have a hard time accepting reality and love oppressing others who they think are minorities. Why would you keep drawing regions into your maps and keep claiming an entire ethnic group? Dangerous and insensitive.

Water is wet.

Kukutente23:
1. The state has a budget. I'm happy you mentioned the Rivers assembly and that's why I referenced your support for Wike. Based on established judgement of the supreme Court, which is the fake assembly? Amaewhule or Jumbo? Let's see how you do a turnaround now
2. Wike and his minions took a state electoral matter to a federal court in Abuja when they clearly know the court has no jurisdiction and obtained a judgement to effectively stop LG elections in conflict with SC judgement for LGs to be democratically constituted. Did you support Wike then or not?
3. Wike got a Judge to stop Rivers allocation when the case is still before the SC. Is that a confirmation of the finality of the SC or a conflict.

I'll be waiting for your response

It is a joke and the height of rascality for you to think Jumbo is the Speaker and his clowns solely constitute the House. Your hatred for Wike has beclouded your sense of reasoning. Stop making allegations you cannot substantiate.

Depravity.

Hemanwel:
But I saw a video of this South African chiwawa recently where she was speaking disdainfully about our country and that she wasn't ready to visit any time soon. What has now changed? So, she was saying them with her tongue in her cheek.

Xenophobe lasan lasan!

I take it that you're not part of the Badenoch crew.

Gbadugbakun:
Tinubu is a useless drug barron.

I hope you can prove it. Don't cry o.

The U.S. didn't help them this time.

nairalee:
Women are the funniest. They'll buy a normal knee level skirt, tear it to slightly beneath the ass level and spend the entire day dragging it down.

They'll tear off a turtle neck dress to show 3/4 of their cleavage only to use a tiny handkerchief to pretend asif they've covering it up.

Girls of nowadays piss me off so much. While taking pictures they'll bend sideways or even turn totally backwards to jiggle their asses yet they'll complain why guys sexualize them.

Confused lot.

Kukutente23:
Lawyer indeed
Are you not the dude who supports every of Wike's attempt to undermine the Rivers state govt using the judiciary. So you don't see anything wrong with someone using the judiciary as a weapon to fight a political cause?
So what happens if the NASS makes a law obliterating LG autonomy in this case, by insisting on the right of governors to sack LG chairmen? Will the SC interpretation still be binding and on which leg will it stand?

What does supporting Wike have to do with this issue? I can support anyone I choose and owe you no explanation. However, I will just state here that I have never supported every action taken by Wike or any politician, unlike you sycophants supporting Fubara. As for the allegation that Wike is weaponizing the judiciary, it is unfounded. What do you suggest an aggreived person should do? Resort to self-help? Since you have labelled a person going to court as weaponizing it. People like you are the ones supporting that lawless Fubara to continue running the state without a budget and a fake assembly.

IfnobeGod20:
It doesn't become the position of the law but a precedence which as time goes on can be overrule if the constitution of the nation doesn't reflect it.
Note this, supreme court pronouncements cannot be law because they are not expected to make law but to interpret law and in the even they are interpreting the laws, precedences are made which later form part of the constitution review as to reflect such pronouncement. In the even such alteration is not effected, the supreme court would not have any other option than to review itself.

The pronouncement of the Supreme Court on an issue is the position of the law until overulled or otherwise repealed respectively by a later Supreme Court judgment or a later statute. The problem with most you is that you lack an understanding of jurisprudence and the significance of a judgement by the Supreme Court.

"The Path of the Law," published in (1897)10 Harvard Law Review 457, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jnr said stated: "The prophecies of what the courts will do in fact, and nothing more pretentious, are what I mean by the law."

Kukutente23:
And you're a lawyer?
Nobody has said their interpretation of the constitution is not the law. My point is that their interpretation was wrong. Even from your quote above, the SC admits that it's not infallible but that even in its fallible state, its decisions are final.

Read Adegbenro v. Akintola and Okumagba v. Egbe.
Where there's no ambiguity, the constitution is to be read with no outside meaning added to it.

Again, you can see that the SC judgement stands in conflict with the ordinary meaning of the constitution and deleted s162 effectively

Yes, I am. Whether you think it is wrong or not is not the point. Once the pronouncement is made, it becomes the position of the law. All interpretations given of the constitution by the Supreme Court is final and binding. It does have the power to over-rule itself later.

Pure evil.

Mugu44:

Tinubu the strongest afonjaman crawling before an Igbo woman

What a twisted mindset. Sad.

MT:
The pronouncement of the SC is an AFFIRMATION of an EXISTING law. The law has always been in existence and not a new law.

Supreme Court Judges don't add to the laws in the constitution. Only legislatures make laws.

I give up on you guys. Should this even be up for discussion?

Best of luck with your flawed position.

I don't need to argue with you. You are not a lawyer.

The Edo State government should retrace its steps immediately. Just the start of this governor's adminstration and he is already treading on the wrong path. It is obvious he lacks good counsel. It might be his downfall, if he doesn't get good advisers.

Kukutente23:
But it is also a legal principle that where the words of the constitution are clear on a matter, the courts have no need to interpret or add anything to it

The judgement of the supreme court was wrong. It deleted s162 of the constitution effectively

You are not a lawyer. I don't know why lay people always dabble into legal issues. The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is the law. ADEGOKE MOTORS LTD. VS DR. BABATUNDE ADESANYA* (1990) LLJR-SC: "We are final not because we are infallible; rather we are infallible because we are final.

MT:
Read what ChatGPT had to tell you.

The pronouncement of the Supreme Court of Nigeria on any matter is the position of the law. Through interpretation, the courts shape and make laws. It happens everywhere, including the U.S. Always consult a lawyer and not AI.