Foreign Affairs › Re: Maduro Heads To Court For Arraignment (photo) by BondRiv: 5:19pm On Jan 05 |
Sham trial. A big circus. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Switzerland Government Freezes Nicolas Maduro's Assets by BondRiv: 5:13pm On Jan 05 |
Puppets. Europe is a conquered continent.
|
Politics › Re: Wike with Rivers APC Chairman, Okocha & PDP State Chairman, Aaron (Picture) by BondRiv: 5:07pm On Jan 05 |
Some of these polls are useless. People don't even phrase questions like they have a brain.
As for Rivers State, Wike controls the structures. An ingrate like Fubara, who was handpicked from the civil service 2 weeks ago can never lead someone like Wike, a veteran in politics. Wike helped Fubara's ungrateful life, but that doesn't mean they will rub shoulders in politics. |
Politics › Re: Tinubu Appoints Magnus Abe As NUPRC Chairman, Seeks Senate Confirmation by BondRiv: 4:59pm On Jan 05 |
In politics, when you want to align, do so properly. The clueless neophyte is busy calling himself 001 because he saw it on the FCT minister's plate number. Fubara does not have what it takes to lead Rivers State. He is grossly incompetent and notorious for his treachery.
Wike leads them all. |
Politics › Re: Wike Warns The National Secretary Of The APC, Ajibola Basiru Over Ticket by BondRiv: 4:52pm On Jan 05 |
People without any political weight interfering in Rivers State affairs. Go to their state now they have no capacity. The fact that you work in a political party doesn't make you a Rivers indigene. The APC National Secretary is a busybody. He should better respect himself. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: ABC News Called U.S. Delta Force Killings Of Venezuelan Soldiers Self-defense. by BondRiv: 11:06am On Jan 05 |
Now you understand what Palestinians are facing in the hands of genocidal occupiers. The propaganda is not new. |
Politics › Re: Rivers SSG, Benibo Fredrick Anabraba Dumps PDP by BondRiv: 10:50am On Jan 05 |
Freshtruth: Wike is a goner fubara holds the cards even tuntubi will be loyal to him now at this moment
Tinubu to wike bro my Ambition comes it's no use ur 2nd term quarell come spoil my own leave Fubara alone after raw I gave u Abuja People who follow a clueless neophyte are usually clueless too. |
Politics › Venezuela Crisis May Create $10 Billion Hole In FG’s ₦58 Trillion Spending Plan by BondRiv(op): 9:43am On Jan 05 |
• Complicates Nigeria’s fiscal fragility, threatens naira stability • OPEC weighs in as eight members meet over supply cutGeopolitical developments in Venezuela and the prospect of a major rattle in global oil supply dynamics could exert downward pressure on crude prices and ultimately stress-test the Federal Government’s N58.18 trillion 2026 spending plan.
The crisis, which has triggered a review of projections across key markets and put enormous pressure on the crude market, is subjecting key budget assumptions to scrutiny, with President Donald Trump’s targeted $50 per barrel price no longer an illusion.
The country is expected to raise about $40.6 billion by producing 673 million barrels of crude in 2026 or 1.84 million barrels per day and sell for $64.85 per barrel, though the National Assembly has proposed a reduction of the price benchmark to $60 per barrel.
Some analysts project that oil prices may dip to $50 per barrel, thereby leading to a potential loss of about $10.24 billion. Following the invasion of Venezuela by the U.S. and the capture of Nicolás Maduro, President Trump had said his administration would invest in producing oil from the North American country.
Already, eight major producers, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, the UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman, yesterday reaffirmed commitment to Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)-backed market stability, citing a steady global economic outlook.
With the Federal Government projecting oil revenues as a key pillar of its N58.18 trillion spending plan, stakeholders warn that a faster-than-expected return of Venezuelan oil to global markets could undermine fiscal projections, weaken foreign exchange (FX) inflows and deepen existing revenue challenges.
The concern comes at a time when Nigeria is already grappling with fiscal fragility. The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, earlier disclosed that the Federal Government recorded a revenue shortfall of about N30 trillion in 2025, highlighting the gap between budget expectations and actual inflows.
Naira, which gained N100/$ last year, the strongest in recent years, may face downward pressure in the face of weakened oil market performance.
The 2026 budget framework estimates a total expenditure of N58.18 trillion. This includes N15.52 trillion debt servicing, N15.25 trillion for non-debt recurrent expenditure and N26.08 trillion earmarked for capital spending.
The projected fiscal deficit stands at N23.85 trillion, equivalent to 4.28 per cent of GDP. Oil remains central to the revenue strategy as the government projects crude oil production of 1.84 million barrels per day (bpd) this year, translating to about 672 million barrels for the year.
The budget benchmark price is set at $64.85 per barrel, implying potential gross oil receipts of about $43.84 billion before production costs, joint venture obligations and revenue-sharing arrangements.
Nigeria has consistently struggled to meet its production targets in recent years due to under-investment, oil theft, pipeline vandalism, operational inefficiencies and declining output from mature fields.
Actual production has remained below benchmark levels, raising doubts about the realism of the 2026 assumptions even before factoring in exogenous risks.
If oil prices fall to $50 per barrel, projected gross revenue would drop to about $33.6 billion, creating a substantial gap in funding for the budget and intensifying borrowing pressures.
The capture of President Nicolás Maduro following a U.S.-backed military operation, stakeholders said, would mark a significant political shift.
While such a development may not immediately transform Venezuela’s production capacity, it could alter the country’s sanction status and compliance risk profile, which have been the primary constraints on its oil exports over the past decade.
Export data by the Kpler Risk and Compliance, visualised by MarineTraffic, shows that Venezuela exported around 707 million barrels of crude per year before 2019. During that period, the U.S. accounted for about 32 per cent of Venezuelan exports, making it the country’s largest buyer, while China and India absorbed much of the remainder.
These exports were supported by conventional trading, shipping and insurance arrangements. This structure changed sharply after U.S. sanctions were tightened in 2019. Venezuelan crude exports fell to below 200 million barrels per year between 2020 and 2021. The decline was driven less by a lack of oil reserves or production capacity than by the withdrawal of traders, shipowners, insurers and banks seeking to avoid sanctions exposure.
From 2022, exports began a partial recovery, rising to approximately 250 to 350 million barrels per year by 2023 and 2024. The recovery was largely driven by shipments to China and, to a lesser extent, India and relied on opaque trading practices such as ship-to-ship transfers, blending operations and the use of shadow tanker fleets. Despite the rebound, export volumes remained less than half of pre-2019 levels.
By 2025, Venezuelan exports appeared to be stabilising but remained structurally constrained by legal, governance and compliance risks. Western buyers and service providers have not returned in significant numbers, reflecting continued uncertainty.
Trump has said that US oil companies would spend billions of dollars to rebuild Venezuela’s oil infrastructure following the reported military operation.
He outlined a plan under which U.S. financial resources and technical expertise would be used to repair damaged facilities, with companies reimbursed for their investments.
While the plan faces uncertainties, including the willingness of major oil companies to invest in a high-risk environment, low global oil prices and the scale of reforms required, stakeholders said the direction of the U.S. policy is significant as a gradual easing of sanctions and improved legal certainty could allow Venezuelan oil to re-enter mainstream global markets over time.
For oil-producing countries such as Nigeria, the concern is not necessarily an immediate displacement of exports, but the broader effect on global supply and prices as additional barrels entering the market would increase supply in an already-fragile demand environment, particularly if global economic growth remains subdued.
Some analysts are already projecting oil prices to hover around $50 per barrel in 2026. A faster recovery in Venezuelan exports could reinforce this trend.
Nigeria is already actively seeking buyers for its 2026 crude cargoes. The U.S., India and China remain important customers and a key influence on global oil pricing.
If U.S. demand shifts towards Venezuelan crude, Nigeria could face stiffer competition in selling its medium and light sweet grades. A former chairman of the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN), Prof. Segun Ajibola, said increased U.S. involvement in Venezuela’s oil sector could affect Nigeria’s ability to meet its 2026 projections. As one of Nigeria’s top oil buyers, any reduction in U.S. demand could have knock-on effects for export volumes and prices, he noted.
“At the current price of about $60.8 per barrel compared with Tinubu’s proposed $64.85, the situation is already becoming stressed. If a price war ensues, as could be triggered by increased supply from Venezuela, it will affect Nigeria’s projections for 2026,” he said.
Ajibola said it is increasingly uneconomic for Nigeria to export crude only to import refined products. He urged the government to resolve longstanding issues around moribund refineries, support private refining capacity and divert more crude to domestic processing for local use and export of refined products.
Oil price weakness would also affect Nigeria’s foreign exchange position. Crude oil sales remain the main source of FX inflows. Lower oil receipts would reduce dollar supply, putting renewed pressure on the naira and complicating efforts to stabilise the foreign exchange market.
This risk is particularly acute given the political calendar. With general elections scheduled for 2027, stakeholders expect increased fiscal pressures and higher demand for foreign exchange as political activities intensify.
Beyond price effects, Venezuela’s rehabilitation could intensify competition for global investment capital as Petroleum Economics, Management and Policy expert, Dr Kaase Gbakon, said a derisked Venezuelan operating environment could divert capital away from Nigeria and other African producers.
“Assuming the U.S.-backed action sufficiently reduces above-ground risks, investment will begin to flow to Venezuela. This could slow Nigeria’s oil and gas development, especially at a time when the country needs fresh capital to arrest production decline,” Gbakon noted.
A renowned petroleum economist, Prof. Wunmi Iledare, said Venezuela’s return would add barrels to a market already struggling to balance supply and demand.
“The immediate implication for Nigeria is not loss of market share, but greater downside risk to oil prices. Venezuelan crude will compete directly with Nigeria’s medium-heavy blends,” he said.
He described the $64.85 per barrel benchmark as achievable but noted that the 1.84 mbpd production target remains aspirational given persistent structural constraints.
Iledare said: “The real risk is budgeting on best-case oil outcomes in a global market where prices are increasingly managed. Prudence demands more conservative assumptions and stronger non-oil revenues.”
An economist at the University of Nigeria, Prof. Emmanuel Nwosu, also urged caution, noting that oil price volatility remains a structural risk for oil-dependent budgets.
While lower oil prices can benefit consumers through reduced fuel and transportation costs, he said, they pose fiscal challenges for producing countries that anchor budgets on oil benchmarks.
He added that while OPEC interventions could stabilise prices, evolving geopolitical alignments, particularly between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, should be closely monitored.
While Nigeria began implementing its tax reform programme in January 2026, aimed at improving revenue mobilisation and reducing dependence on oil, experts are uncertain whether the reforms can deliver meaningful buffers in the short term.
Structural tax reforms typically take time to yield results, and enforcement challenges persist. With debt servicing already consuming N15.52 trillion over a quarter of total expenditure, the scope for absorbing revenue shocks remains limited.
A certified financial education instructor, Kalu Aja, said the oil price benchmark in the 2026 budget now appears generous. “If a new U.S.-backed Venezuelan leadership decides to pump more oil, global prices will come under pressure. If Russia also reaches a ceasefire in Ukraine, prices could fall further. Nigeria should be preparing an austerity budget, not an optimistic one,” he tweeted over the weekend.
Partner at Kreston Pedabo, Olufemi Idowu, said the new U.S.–Venezuela relationship may affect Nigeria’s revenue projections by putting pressure on both oil prices and Nigeria’s ability to sell its crude. According to him, Venezuela and Nigeria both sell crude oil to similar markets, which makes them competitors.
“While the United States is not Nigeria’s largest buyer today, it remains an important market and plays a major role in influencing global oil prices. If the U.S. strengthens its oil ties with Venezuela and supports increased production there, global supply will likely rise. In most cases, higher supply leads to lower prices, and this could reduce Nigeria’s oil revenue,” Idowu said.
With revenues already underperforming and debt obligations rising, the stakeholders insisted that Nigeria has limited room to absorb further shocks, warning that without more conservative budgeting, stronger non-oil revenue mobilisation and tighter spending discipline, the N58.18 trillion 2026 budget could face significant implementation challenges. https://guardian.ng/news/venezuela-crisis-may-create-10b-hole-in-fgs-n58tr-spending-plan/
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Trump Warns New Venezuelan Leader As Maduro Set To Appear In Court by BondRiv: 8:54am On Jan 05 |
Trump's threat to Venezuela's vice president only reaffirms the position that it was never about drugs. |
Politics › Re: Wike Vs Fubara: Victor Giadom's Statement "So Called Governor" - Ajibola Bashiru by BondRiv: 12:07am On Jan 05 |
Amumaigwe: How can Wike sign an agreement on a transaction that does not belong exclusively to him? Make it make sense please Parties are bound by their agreement. There is nothing Fubara willingly agreed to that he can't fulfill. Just that when you're an Opobo snake, your nature will certainly be displayed. Fubara is just an unrepentant ingrate. |
Politics › Re: Wike Vs Fubara: Victor Giadom's Statement "So Called Governor" - Ajibola Bashiru by BondRiv: 12:03am On Jan 05 |
LibertyRep: Didn't the President call a gov 'Eleyi' back then? I wonder. Don't mind the hypocrite desperate for attention. |
Politics › Re: Wike Vs Fubara: Victor Giadom's Statement "So Called Governor" - Ajibola Bashiru by BondRiv: 12:01am On Jan 05 |
What is unfortunate is the fact that you're a busybody. Giadom has the right to express himself the way he did. |
Foreign Affairs › U.S. Secretary Of State, Marco Rubio, Struggles To Defend Actions In Venezuela by BondRiv(op): 11:28pm On Jan 04 |
For the records, it must be stated unequivocally that the events which occurred in Venezuela on 3rd January 2026, violated international law, particularly, Article 2 of the United Nations Charter. Such illegal actions further entrench the law of the jungle, where might is right. I know at this point, a lot of people are already familiar with the hypocrisy of the U.S. and its Western allies.
On "THIS WEEK" with George Stephanopoulos which aired today, Secretary of State, Marco Rubio was a guest. I watched as the usually eloquent Marco Rubio stuttered and struggled to defend the illegal actions of the U.S. in Venezuela. It was so embarrassing and shameful.
The anchor's first question was about Trump's statement that the United States was going to run Venezuela. He asked Rubio under what legal authority it was going to be done. Rubio avoided the question and started rambling about "quarantining" Venezuela's oil. The anchor who wasn't going to let him evade the question then repeated it. Rubio's answer was:
"We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. I don't know, is a court not a legal authority?"
I couldn't believe it. How does that answer the question about the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?
By the way, at beginning of the show when Rubio was rambling, he talked about the U.S. having leverage which is now being used. Aside the aspect about "quarantining" the oil, I couldn't help but think about their hostages. Are the kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife being used as leverage too? Is the U.S. extorting a country? It wouldn't be the first time.
One of the outrageous answers in the interview was when the anchor, unclear on what legal authority the United States was going to run Venezuela, informed Rubio that several members of Congress and other legal experts have said the operation to take Maduro was illegal because Trump didn’t seek congressional authorization. Rubio's answer was:
"It wasn't necessary because this is not an invasion. We didn't occupy a country. This was an arrest operation. This was a law enforcement operation. He was arrested on the ground in Venezuela by FBI agents, read his rights and removed from the country..."
Immediately I heard that answer, I knew these guys were done. They had nothing to justify their illegal actions in Venezuela, even at home.
Invasion is an unwelcome intrusion or incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
The United States launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela with more than 150 United States Armed Forces aircraft conducting airstrikes across northern Venezuela and in areas around the capital city of Caracas. They also had US forces on the ground. However, according to Rubio, it was not an invasion?
Another ridiculous part of the interview was when Rubio mentioned FBI's involvement. FBI's jurisdiction outside the U.S. is limited, focusing on U.S. citizens and interests, requiring host country consent for operations. They cannot enforce U.S. laws directly on foreign soil. So how come they arrested Maduro in Venezuela and read his rights according to Rubio?
The whole operation carried out by the U.S. in Venezuela is drenched in illegality. Every attempt to defend it fails.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Maduro Is A Thug, Supported Terrorists, American Enemies Worldwide – Ted Cruz by BondRiv: 8:24pm On Jan 04 |
I guess we are supposed to believe Lyin' Ted too. The narratives keep changing.
The USA is a terrorist state.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: United States Begins Military Preparation against Iran. by BondRiv: 7:55pm On Jan 04*. Modified: 8:15pm On Jan 04 |
The United States of Israel. If you are the world's largest weapons producer and exporter, certainly you would want persistent conflict.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Gave America Right To Arrest A President by BondRiv: 7:42pm On Jan 04 |
No one did, and they don't have that right. They are operating solely on might without legal backing. This is what international law was supposed to curb. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Kamala Harris Responds to Trump's Actions on Maduro and Venezuela by BondRiv: 7:16pm On Jan 04 |
Zocalite: Lolzzzzz 🤣
You don't know the position of US in the world.
Do you know what super power meant
ote author=BondRiv post=138015709]
Stop trying to muddle the waters and be coherent. People act like you do when they know their position is wrong or don't understand what they are talking about. Is the action by the USA government right or wrong?
I don't support Nigeria blindly. Nigeria is not perfect and can make wrong decisions. I'll be the first to admit that.
However, our intervention in Benin was done with the approval of the president of Benin. We did not violate their sovereignty. We didn't interfere in Niger and Mali, but any such intervention would have been done in line with international law. We won't act unilaterally.
The highlighted portion of your comment is a mere allegation from an oil hungry government led by Trump. It remains an unproven allegation. Whether true or not, it cannot justify an attack on Venezuela, killing of armed personnel, civilians, kidnap of the president and his wife.
Now Trump and his gang of thieves want to control the country. Would they have done this if Venezuela was not a weak country? I'm sure they wouldn't have resorted to self-help, but explore other avenues, possibly under international law. The USA violated international law and commited war crimes in Venezuela. They can't even defend their position. I watched the U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on ABC News. He couldn't even defend their actions in Venezuela. Even within his country which is the U.S., they had no legal authority to attack Venezuela. International law is clear. I knew the U.S. government wouldn't be able to defend what happened in Venezuela, but when I heard Rubio say it wasn't an invasion, I knew they were desperate and clueless. He also said FBI 🤣 made the arrest and read Maduro his rights. Does the FBI have jurisdiction in Venezuela? This is about oil, shutting out rivals like Russia and China from their hemisphere, and regime change. Try to acquire knowledge, so that you can understand and correctly analyse events like this. Instead of blindly parroting propaganda because you chose to be willfully ignorant.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Vice President Delcy Rodriguez Sworn In As 'Acting President' Of Venezuela by BondRiv: 4:49pm On Jan 04 |
horlando30: I wonder what Tulsi Garba thinks now? DNI for that matter. In her heart, I think she still believes so, like every sensible person. |
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Throwback: When US Tried It In Africa In 1993, It Was Disaster And Humiliation by BondRiv: 4:17pm On Jan 04 |
bigpicture001: Now senator Omar from Somali decent is in the US Senate and still abusing their nationality...
Us dey take rubbish sha.. try china or isreal for a size More should even enter the USA. Since they go about invading and destabilising countries. Do you expect the inhabitants of those countries to remain in the hell the USA has created? They will join them in the USA. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: What’s The Point Of Having Russia As An Ally ? by BondRiv: 3:49pm On Jan 04 |
Sheuns: There’s no better ally for a country than USA. They will have your back always. Take Israel and Saudi Arabia for example. If not for the USA, Iran for don show Saudi shege for Middle East.
Russia and China are unreliable allies. America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests. You must not have heard of Kissinger. So long as you are focused on evil, USA will be nearby. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: What’s The Point Of Having Russia As An Ally ? by BondRiv: 3:35pm On Jan 04*. Modified: 3:58pm On Jan 04 |
Your ally can't do everything for you, but I get the frustration regarding Russia. They tried for Assad in Syria though, else it would have been over for him a long time ago.
Considering these conflicts, usually you have only Russia backing a country, while the USA is backed by its Western allies putting pressure on that country.
Proximity matters too. Venezuela is in South America, relatively close to the USA. Russia does not even have a permanent military base there, unlike Syria.
Another thing is MOTIVE. I rank this above everything. Contrary to the endless propaganda by the mainstream media, Russia has no ambition to rule the world, but the USA does. That alone changes everything, including what you are willing to sacrifice.
There is no continent you won't find a U.S. military base, and they are the world's largest arms producer and exporter.
The USA topples democratic governments, eliminates leaders, creates and fund terrorism, invades and occupies a country to remain dominant in the world.
The USA is a force of evil in the world. Most people have no idea. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Vice President Delcy Rodriguez Sworn In As 'Acting President' Of Venezuela by BondRiv: 3:03pm On Jan 04 |
madridguy: I am waiting to know what really happened in Venezuela. We need to know what really happened because kidnapping a whole president with no single form of resistance. I have read an article from a reputable foreign news media. The Americans had casualties. Maduro was trying to get to a steel safe room before his capture. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: Vice President Delcy Rodriguez Sworn In As 'Acting President' Of Venezuela by BondRiv: 3:00pm On Jan 04*. Modified: 3:15pm On Jan 04 |
Venezuela for Venezuelans!
Do not become another Gaza. Resist foreign occupation of your country and control of the government.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Kamala Harris Responds to Trump's Actions on Maduro and Venezuela by BondRiv: 2:34pm On Jan 04*. Modified: 2:51pm On Jan 04 |
Zocalite: You be comedian
Even nigeria interfered in Benin republic and wanted to interfere in Niger republic and Mali
Moreover US - the world superpower
And Venezuela was also shipping drugs into US using government facilities
Do you know how many Venezuelans were lurking at the border of US daily leaving their country because of maduro
Oga you be comic Stop trying to muddle the waters and be coherent. People act like you do when they know their position is wrong or don't understand what they are talking about. Is the action by the USA government right or wrong? I don't support Nigeria blindly. Nigeria is not perfect and can make wrong decisions. I'll be the first to admit that. However, our intervention in Benin was done with the approval of the president of Benin. We did not violate their sovereignty. We didn't interfere in Niger and Mali, but any such intervention would have been done in line with international law. We won't act unilaterally. The highlighted portion of your comment is a mere allegation from an oil hungry government led by Trump. It remains an unproven allegation. Whether true or not, it cannot justify an attack on Venezuela, killing of armed personnel, civilians, kidnap of the president and his wife. Now Trump and his gang of thieves want to control the country. Would they have done this if Venezuela was not a weak country? I'm sure they wouldn't have resorted to self-help, but explore other avenues, possibly under international law. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: In Response To Maduro's Capture, Protests Spring Up Across The US (Photos) by BondRiv: 2:10pm On Jan 04*. Modified: 2:58pm On Jan 04 |
No matter what the armed robbers of the USA government take around the world, the lives of most Americans and the country will never change. Crime does not pay and there are consequences. The homelessness, bad healthcare, gun violence, bad economy, etc., will persist in the USA. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: In Response To Maduro's Capture, Protests Spring Up Across The US (Photos) by BondRiv: 2:01pm On Jan 04 |
As they should. Any sensible person ought to condemn what Trump authorised. How dare you kidnap the president of a country and his wife? In which world is that permissible?
The USA is a terrorist state acting with raw military might. Even Hollywood will have a hard time salvaging their reputation with the usual propaganda.
There is an acting president in Venezuela right now. The Venezuelan people must resist becoming Gaza. They must resist illegal occupation of their country and control of the government.
Venezuela for Venezuelans!
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Kamala Harris Responds to Trump's Actions on Maduro and Venezuela by BondRiv: 1:44pm On Jan 04 |
Zocalite: It's funny kamala says it's about oil, and also acknowledge maduro is brutal and illegitimate
Oil in 2026 - lolzzzzz 🤣
How can USA be after oil in 2026
There are many countries discovering oil who are even ready to dash US oil
Many arab countries are lobbying US not to accept green energy
Venezuelans are relieved, and happy a tyrant has been uprooted
Democrats should not have this kind of person as their front man Both things can be true. I wonder the type of education some of you have these days. Still doesn't give the U.S. the right to interfere.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: Kamala Harris Responds to Trump's Actions on Maduro and Venezuela by BondRiv: 1:40pm On Jan 04 |
HacheNoire: Some Nigerians know more than Kamala
They have been ranting it’s not about oil even when Trump has publicly thrown it to their face.
It’s just really a sad time in history! We have learned, learnt and re-learnt, but glaring the majority of Africans will never escape from mental slavery.
They are clapping for same stroke that was used on them. 🤣😂🤣😂 They are ignorant lots. What Trump is doing in Venezuela is even detrimental to an oil economy like ours. It is no secret that the U.S. wants to affect oil prices. But hardcore zombie supporters of Tinubu's government like Helinuse are cheering Trump. Sheer ignorance.
|
Foreign Affairs › Re: We Will Never Again Be A Colony Of Any Empire, Venezuela's Vice President by BondRiv: 11:20am On Jan 04 |
Cromagnon: must you hold usd? Have you not understood anything so far? Who enjoys holding it? They make you hold it or there are consequences. |
Politics › Re: Wike Says He Will Be Buried Politically If Fubara Secures Second Term by BondRiv: 11:19am On Jan 04 |
Wike has to support another candidate for governorship. That is obvious. Only a mad person will repeat the same thing with that unrepentant treacherous ingrate. |
Foreign Affairs › Re: We Will Never Again Be A Colony Of Any Empire, Venezuela's Vice President by BondRiv: 11:11am On Jan 04 |
SlavaUkraini: Continue to Cry 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Your Hot Tears is very Sweet....
The Venezuelan people will run their own country with the US supporting them...
Let me give you a little bit of History and Geopolitical lesson and make sure you never forget it because it will help you understand some of America's Interventionist actions globally.
Many years ago the American government sent high level diplomats to Saudi Arabia and they made a deal with the house of Saud....
The deal was simple ....
" The House of Saud can continue to Rule the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with American Protection, while in return, Every Crude Oil must be Sold in Dollars"
The Billions of Dollars in crude sales belong to Saudi Arabia not America but the Crude must be sold in Dollars....
Saddam Hussein had problems with the US when he had plans to start selling Iraqi Crude in Euros....
Ghaddafi started having problems with the US and France when he was proposing a common African currency backed by Gold and Natural Resources...
What Trump and the US is looking for in Venezuela is not Crude Oil because America have enough Crude Oil...
What America is after is the Continuation and Dominance of the Petro-Dollar system
The Global demand for the Dollar must continue. That is what makes America Great
If the New Leader of Venezuela will not Agree to sell Venezuelan Oil in US Dollars that leader will Join Maduro wherever he is ....... I can bet you on that one..
Trump is not even hiding it. The Man is so open about it.
He has said it that American Oil companies will soon go in and start revamping the Venezuelan Oil Sector...
American Oil companies will be drilling the Oil for the Venezuelan people and that Oil will be Sold in Dollars which favors the American Economy..
Every Global Super power today wants you to do business in their currency because they saw how that system has favoured the American Economy.
They are busy forming BRICS to move away from dollars and settle trade in their own currencies and America is smiling because America has other plans to make the dollar relevant.. 
As Long as the Dollar remains relevant, America will always be on top
America will always be 10 steps ahead of them because God Almighty made them number 1 for such a time as this...
And who God has blessed, no one can curse
God Bless America 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
God Bless Donald J Trump
God Bless Benjamin Netanyahu
I Stand with America and Israel Forever Considering the content of your post, how did you end up concluding with God bless America? Is that something to celebrate or be proud of? Did you even understand your comment? Some of you are just zombies.
|