CanadaOrBust's Posts
Nairaland Forum › CanadaOrBust's Profile › CanadaOrBust's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 (of 212 pages)
mrkings84:No need. Something has already protected Nigerians from this virus otherwise half the country would be dead by now. I believe thousands have it here already just that it doesn’t make us that sick |
Guestlander:Well, patiently explain this to me. In China, the Communist Govt mandates every of their citizens to have a phone - that’s one of their means of monitoring the people. Their number of phone accounts are always creeping up. Yet between December and February the number of accounts went DOWN - almost 8 million accounts were closed! See below
|
darealez:You have it wrong - it is the very ill that go on ventilators NOT those who have recovered! Those who recover test negative twice and go home. As far as I know no Nigerian permanently in Nigeria has ever been sick enough to need a ventilator. The thing is we are sheepishly copying other countries without adapting to our own unique situation. FOR SOME REASON CORONA DOES NOT SERIOUSLY AFFECT US! China lost about 8million people; u didn’t see them worry about shortage of ventilators because they realise they are overpopulated - they realized they needed to lose some people as long as they could lie to the world about it! |
januzaj:Not only that a China is lying. Solid circumstantial evidence suggests they lost about 8 million people to the virus. Which is not much considering their overpopulation (1.5billion) - they used it as a means of population control! |
darealez: SadiqBabaSani:But stay home for how long?? Below is an argument I presented to somebody. If u read it carefully you’d agree it is the best way forward for Nigeria: ————————— Ok, it is established fact that AT MOST we’d lose less than 2% of those who get this virus (though currently it is 0% for Nigerians permanently living in Nigeria!) How many people do u think will die if there is mass starvation plus all the social ills that’d come with closing down everything? Plus the irreversible damage to the economy? If u calm down and look at it UNEMOTIONALLY you’d see the sense in what I’m saying. (Also remember that both our birth rate and population density are quite high). Also, SINCE THE DEATH RATE IS SO LOW, we can go the herd immunity route - gradually as more and more people recover and therefore develop immunity to the virus, we’d eventually develop herd immunity, at which point the virus is defeated. Here’s the rest of my argument to the guy (which is totally original by the way): First of all we’d be doing everything other countries are doing EXCEPT totally shut down our society. People will be sentisized to not crowd together, social distancing, to wash hands, to use face masks, etc, PLUS we’d also be treating those we can which will save some. So there’d be no “everyone is allowed to be infected at the same time, with no one taking care of anybody“. Secondly, it is established that 97% of the infected, get well without needing any special medical care (so for them it is just like, say, malaria) Thirdly we’d have more people who have survived the virus and therefore whose blood have immunity and can be used to treat the sick (this has been shown to work) Fourthly we should remember we are overpopulated. It is better that we fight a war and win and come out stronger (though losing some people), than to close everything and hide like cowards because of an enemy we know we can defeat (though we’d lose some people while doing it). Countries have gone to war instead of surrendering, knowing fully well they’d lose half their people! |
Kiss your ass goodbye |
TheWebbers: Acidosis:Actually he has a point. Below is an argument I presented. If u read it carefully you’d agree it is the best way forward for Nigeria: ————————— Ok, it is established fact that AT MOST we’d lose less than 2% of those who get this virus (though currently it is 0% for Nigerians permanently living in Nigeria!) How many people do u think will die if there is mass starvation plus all the social ills that’d come with closing down everything? Plus the irreversible damage to the economy? If u calm down and look at it UNEMOTIONALLY you’d see the sense in what I’m saying. (Also remember that both our birth rate and population density are quite high). Also, SINCE THE DEATH RATE IS SO LOW, we can go the herd immunity route - gradually as more and more people recover and therefore develop immunity to the virus, we’d eventually develop herd immunity, at which point the virus is defeated. Here’s the rest of my argument to the guy (which is totally original by the way): First of all we’d be doing everything other countries are doing EXCEPT totally shut down our society. People will be sentisized to not crowd together, social distancing, to wash hands, to use face masks, etc, PLUS we’d also be treating those we can which will save some. So there’d be no “everyone is allowed to be infected at the same time, with no one taking care of anybody“. Secondly, it is established that 97% of the infected, get well without needing any special medical care (so for them it is just like, say, malaria) Thirdly we’d have more people who have survived the virus and therefore whose blood have immunity and can be used to treat the sick (this has been shown to work) Fourthly we should remember we are overpopulated. It is better that we fight a war and win and come out stronger (though losing some people), than to close everything and hide like cowards because of an enemy we know we can defeat (though we’d lose some people while doing it). Countries have gone to war instead of surrendering, knowing fully well they’d lose half their people! |
NiCurious:Here’s the rest of my argument to the guy (which is totally original by the way): First of all we’d be doing everything other countries are doing EXCEPT totally shut down our society. People will be sentisized to not crowd together, social distancing, to wash hands, to use face masks, etc, PLUS we’d also be treating those we can which will save some. So there’d be no “everyone is allowed to be infected at the same time, with no one taking care of anybody“. Secondly 97% of the infected, get well without needing any special medical care (so for them it is just like, say, malaria) Thirdly we’d have more people who have survived the virus and therefore whose blood have immunity and can be used to treat the sick (this has been shown to work) Fourthly we should remember we are overpopulated. It is better that we fight a war and win and come out stronger (though losing some people), than to close everything and hide like cowards because of an enemy we know we can defeat (though we’d lose some people while doing it). Countries have gone to war instead of surrendering, knowing fully well they’d lose half their people! |
NiCurious:Tpharell he is exactly right. I thought it was obvious that I meant “Nigerians residing permanently in Nigeria”. I’ve written about this previously (see below). I still maintain this below is the best approach for Nigeria because the virus death rate is so low AND we are overpopulated. ————————— Ok, it is established fact that AT MOST we’d lose less than 2% of those who get the virus (though currently it is 0% for Nigerians permanently living in Nigeria!) How many people do u think will die if there is mass starvation plus all the social ills that’d come with closing down everything? Plus the irreversible damage to the economy. If u calm down and look at it UNEMOTIONALLY you’d see the sense in what I’m saying. (Also remember that both our birth rate and population density are quite high). Also, SINCE THE DEATH RATE IS SO LOW, we can go the herd immunity route - gradually as more and more people recover and therefore develop immunity to the virus, we’d eventually develop herd immunity, at which point the virus is defeated (see below).
|
Tpharell:I keep saying: there is no evidence that this virus can kill a Nigerian permanently in Nigeria or even make them acutely ill. Maybe the death rate is 0% among Nigerians permanently in Nigeria! |
ademasta:Not so fast, he said March 27th but he didn’t say what year. Watch the video. You must first clarify what year he meant b4 jumping to conclusions |
Throwback:It is amazing how small things and customs made a lot of difference. Do u know that Turkish custom of rubbing cologne on their hands b4 going out is credited for their low incidence of corona! As for 9ja urban dirtiness, I don’t think it mattered much in this case - or half of Lagos will be dead by now! |
highbeekeys:Just imagine if Bubu was like this - there’d be no corona in Nigeria today! |
This a very good question. I’ve been pondering the same thing. I think people will forever stop shaking hands and hugging. Italians will forever stop greeting with hugs and kisses. Nigerians will stop complaining about their hot weather, hot sun, and malaria - which are basically why half of them are not yet dead! Politicians will start investing in local hospitals. Japanese will continue not being too touchy. China will ban wet markets. People will believe TB Joshua less. People will be more suspicious of pastors performing miracle cures. People will realise that things are temporary - that things can change suddenly. Things will never return to how they were. More: Companies will create modalities whereby employees can seemlessly work from home. People will more value being able to independently make a living from home without being employed by anybody. |
Meanwhile same Edo indigenes are misbehaving in Italy, having crowded wedding! https://www.nairaland.com/5759538/couple-weds-italy-ignoring-corona#87826262 BTW Italy just recorded almost 1000 dead in 24 hrs! |
Well if u went from Edo through Chad, survived the desert, survived the slavery, rapes, wanton murders in Lybia, survived rickety, sinking, overcrowded boats to Italy, then Coronavirus is nothing! |
We’d be lucky if Nigeria doesn’t even levy new taxes - seeing as oil price has tanked |
vixpal:Johnson, Yeltson, what is the difference |
NairaMaster1:Ours is WORSE not worst. U only use “worst” if u r comparing more than two things. Sorry, I’m tired of seeing this on NL all the time so I’ve decided to correct it every time I see it! |
UKBobo:Exactly! I think the whole coronavirus thing is a hoax! |
First Prince Charles. Now Boris Yeltson. What exactly is going on in Uk
|
Na wa |
LEBEfirstson:That is the most specific and direct prophesy I’ve seen in this country with specific date and reason. That is how prophesy should be. If it fails it fails instead of all these predictions and guesswork. He should get credit for bravery |
Oteleye:Nobody knows if it is life-long. But there is immunity. Something is faulty in this China’s case |
Then the tests or something are faulty. If u know the science you’d know it is not possible so soon. It is like you allowing someone to enter your house when you already know he is a robber who just robbed u yesterday. |
Leonyluiz:Yes sir!! If u tell me what exactly I should keep quiet about. Maybe u r the one who should STFU if u have nothing to contribute. I |
Fake data. Many people have narrated how they couldn’t get a test despite symptoms. Which is borne out by the following: ———————— The Troubling Data Behind Nigeria’s Low Number Of Coronavirus Cases Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, has a case count of fewer than 50 coronavirus cases. But what’s become increasingly clear is that low number is not because the country has been lucky or particularly effective with preventing the spread of the disease—it’s more likely because local authorities are simply not testing enough people. The latest available report by Nigeria’s Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) shows the country had tested only 152 people as of Mar. 22. That’s compared with South Africa which has conducted over 15,500 tests so far despite recording its index case a week later than Nigeria . |
Gerrard59:Below is Japan’s response to the virus. Compare it to Italy’s response and tell me which one u honestly think is more stringent. Response is certainly not the answer for the discrepancy between the two nations.
|
Useless data that everyone knows is wrong. Many people have narrated how they couldn’t get a test despite symptoms. Which is borne out by the following: ———————— The Troubling Data Point Behind Nigeria’s Low Number Of Coronavirus Cases Nigeria, Africa’s most populous country, has a case count of fewer than 50 coronavirus cases. But what’s become increasingly clear is that low number is not because the country has been lucky or particularly effective with preventing the spread of the disease—it’s more likely because local authorities are simply not testing enough people. The latest available report by Nigeria’s Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) shows the country had tested only 152 people as of Mar. 22. That’s compared with South Africa which has conducted over 15,500 tests so far despite recording its index case a week later than Nigeria . |
Gerrard59:Why not - Europeans had no virus. Italy is by far the first country to ban flights, declare state of emergency, and quarantine whole country! No, I think what did them in is their custom of greeting with kiss and touchy feely |
dangermouse:See below
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 (of 212 pages)
