CharlesCNG's Posts
Nairaland Forum › CharlesCNG's Profile › CharlesCNG's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 48 pages)
 Politics › Re: "I've Changed Party 3 Times Because Everywhere I Go, They Destroy It"- Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 6:57am On Jul 28 |
oz4real83:Gbam. That was a self-inflicted political miscalculation. I still wonder what kind of political judgment made Peter Obi believe that Atiku Abubakar—a man who has pursued the presidency for decades and has never shown any inclination to step aside—would suddenly surrender his ambition. Was it political desperation? Or was it simply a serious misreading of Nigerian political reality? The wiser course would have been to remain in the Labour Party, weather the internal storm, consolidate his support base, and spend the next four years building party structures from the ward level upward. Instead, he abandoned the platform that gave him national relevance to join a coalition where another long-standing presidential aspirant was already firmly established. Politics rewards patience and strategic calculation—not wishful thinking. 2 Likes 2 Shares |
| Politics › Re: I Left $150m In State Treasury; Can Any Governor Show $15m Savings? – Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 6:46am On Jul 28 |
gare:DID BS PETER ACTUALLY LEFT $150 MILLION? LET'S GO VERIFY. By CharlesCNG. Willie Obiano—Peter Obi’s handpicked successor, whom he personally supported into office—did not take long to repudiate both the savings mythology and the man behind it. Obiano’s administration challenged the claim that Obi left behind a freely available ₦75 billion treasure chest, pointing instead to a mixture of cash, investments, “near-cash” assets and substantial inherited commitments. That response was politically devastating because it came not from an APC opponent, but from Obi’s own successor and former ally. When the man you selected to preserve your legacy begins dismantling your celebrated figures almost immediately after taking office, Nigerians are entitled to ask whether the story was ever as clean as it was packaged. Then came Charles Soludo, another successor, who said the much-advertised investments were worth “next to nothing.” Two successors. Two damaging rebuttals. Yet Obi continues to recycle the same disputed numbers as though repetition were an audit certificate. That is the pattern: announce an impressive figure, remove the liabilities, ignore the opportunity cost, exaggerate the investment value and present the resulting political arithmetic as prudent governance. Obi wants Nigerians to admire the money he claims he left in the bank without asking what development was postponed, what obligations were unpaid and what the investments eventually became. No wonder Obiano repudiated him so quickly. He entered office, opened the books and apparently discovered that the legend was far richer than the balance sheet. Peter Obi did not merely leave disputed savings. He left behind a financial fairy tale that his own chosen successor refused to continue narrating. |
| Politics › Re: I Feel Irritated By Peter Obi's Interview With Seun- Aisha Yesufu by CharlesCNG: 6:37am On Jul 28 |
givedemwotowoto:WHEN THE INTERVIEW EXPOSED THE CANDIDATE, OBIDIENTS DECLARED JOURNALISM DEAD. by CharlesCNG Obidients are not angry because Seun Okinbaloye failed as a journalist. They are angry because the wind blew, and what Peter Obi’s political packaging had carefully covered was exposed for Nigerians to see. Before the interview, Channels Television was respected enough for Peter Obi to appear there. Seun was qualified enough to ask him questions. But immediately the questions exposed the emptiness behind the slogans, Channels suddenly became “unqualified,” Seun acquired imaginary paymasters, and Nigerian journalism was declared dead. What a convenient coincidence. Even Rufai Oseni—one of Obi’s most sympathetic media defenders—has been forced to acknowledge the central problem: there was plenty of promise, but very little explanation of [b]how [/b]those promises would be achieved. TRANSLATION: OBI IS AN EMPTY BARREL! Now the same people who once demanded more media exposure for Obi are advising him to avoid serious interviewers and appear only on stations that will discuss “issues everyday Nigerians can relate with.” Translation: take him somewhere the questions will be softer and the follow-ups less dangerous. They have finally realised that Platform Pilgrim Peter suffers from political foot-in-mouth disease. Each time he speaks without protection, another slogan collapses, another figure is questioned and another missing blueprint becomes obvious. Seun did not manufacture Obi’s answers. Channels did not force him to make vague promises. No paymaster prevented him from explaining his security architecture, electricity plan, funding model or implementation timetable. Peter Obi demarketed himself—with his own mouth. The damage is already done. Obidients may now blacklist Channels, insult Seun and blame imaginary conspirators, but you cannot erase an interview millions have already watched. The messenger is being attacked because the message cannot be defended. Blueprintless Peter entered the studio as a carefully marketed alternative and left as his own opposition’s richest source of campaign material. |
| Politics › Re: A PR Disaster’ — Presidency Knocks Peter Obi Over TV Interview by CharlesCNG: 6:15am On Jul 28 |
iwaeda:“PETER OBI 'S FOOLISH BOAST:HOW MANY GOVERNORS SAVED LIKE ME?” —WHY WISE GOVERNORS DO NOT GOVERN LIKE BANK MANAGERS. by CharlesCNG. Peter Obi has again boasted that he left $150 million and ₦36 billion for Anambra, asking how many governors could claim the same achievement. That boast may sound impressive until his successors’ responses are examined. Willie Obiano’s administration rejected the popular claim that Obi handed over ₦75 billion in freely available cash. It reportedly distinguished between actual cash, investments and “near-cash” assets, while arguing that the incoming administration inherited projects with a total contract value reportedly reaching ₦185.1 billion. The obiano govt said approximately ₦35.1 billion was later paid on inherited projects. Charles Soludo was even more devastating. Asked about the investments credited to Obi, Soludo said that, based on what he had seen, their present value was “next to nothing.” Obi’s wider financial storytelling has also faced credibility questions. A 2025 fact-check found his repeated claim that he left Anambra without debt to be false or misleading. Yet he keeps presenting large figures as though repetition converts controversy into audited fact. The greater problem is the thinking behind the boast. A governor is not elected to behave like a bank’s fixed-deposit manager. Public money exists to provide roads, schools, hospitals, water, security, industrial infrastructure and economic opportunity. Why do “other governors” not necessarily copy Obi? Because they are not as financially foolish like him. Because a wise governor understands opportunity cost. Money sitting in a bank while erosion destroys communities, industries lack power, schools need laboratories and hospitals need equipment is not automatically prudence. It is deferred development disguised as financial brilliance. Boasting about such savings is like a father proudly displaying a fat bank balance while his failing to provide education for his children. Nobody is arguing that government should spend recklessly. Responsible governments need reserves and must avoid debt traps. But the intelligent question is not: “How much money did you leave behind?” It is: “What public value did you create, what liabilities remained, and what return did the saved money eventually produce?” Until those questions are answered with audited records, Obi’s savings boast does not establish genius. Obi seems to be too daft to understand that the proper legacy of government is not money sleeping in a bank. It is development working in the streets. It exposes the folly of confusing an impressive account balance with successful government. No wonder Willie Obiano—Peter Obi’s handpicked successor, whom he personally supported into office—did not take long to[i] repudiate both the savings mythology and the man behind it.[/i] That response was politically devastating because it came not from an APC opponent, but from Obi’s own successor and former ally. When the man you selected to preserve your legacy begins dismantling your celebrated figures almost immediately after taking office, Nigerians are entitled to ask whether the story was ever as clean as it was packaged. Then came Charles Soludo, another successor, who said the much-advertised investments were worth “next to nothing.” Two successors. Two damaging rebuttals. Yet BS Peter continues to recycle the same disputed numbers as though repetition were an audit certificate. Peter Obi wants applause for leaving public money unemployed while Anambra’s development needs were queuing outside the bank. |
| Politics › Re: I Left $150m In State Treasury; Can Any Governor Show $15m Savings? – Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 6:14am On Jul 28 |
givedemwotowoto:“PETER OBI 'S FOOLISH BOAST:HOW MANY GOVERNORS SAVED LIKE ME?” —WHY WISE GOVERNORS DO NOT GOVERN LIKE BANK MANAGERS. by CharlesCNG. Peter Obi has again boasted that he left $150 million and ₦36 billion for Anambra, asking how many governors could claim the same achievement. That boast may sound impressive until his successors’ responses are examined. Willie Obiano’s administration rejected the popular claim that Obi handed over ₦75 billion in freely available cash. It reportedly distinguished between actual cash, investments and “near-cash” assets, while arguing that the incoming administration inherited projects with a total contract value reportedly reaching ₦185.1 billion. The obiano govt said approximately ₦35.1 billion was later paid on inherited projects. Charles Soludo was even more devastating. Asked about the investments credited to Obi, Soludo said that, based on what he had seen, their present value was “next to nothing.” Obi’s wider financial storytelling has also faced credibility questions. A 2025 fact-check found his repeated claim that he left Anambra without debt to be false or misleading. Yet he keeps presenting large figures as though repetition converts controversy into audited fact. The greater problem is the thinking behind the boast. A governor is not elected to behave like a bank’s fixed-deposit manager. Public money exists to provide roads, schools, hospitals, water, security, industrial infrastructure and economic opportunity. Why do “other governors” not necessarily copy Obi? Because they are not as financially foolish like him. Because a wise governor understands opportunity cost. Money sitting in a bank while erosion destroys communities, industries lack power, schools need laboratories and hospitals need equipment is not automatically prudence. It is deferred development disguised as financial brilliance. Boasting about such savings is like a father proudly displaying a fat bank balance while his failing to provide education for his children. Nobody is arguing that government should spend recklessly. Responsible governments need reserves and must avoid debt traps. But the intelligent question is not: “How much money did you leave behind?” It is: “What public value did you create, what liabilities remained, and what return did the saved money eventually produce?” Until those questions are answered with audited records, Obi’s savings boast does not establish genius. Obi seems to be too daft to understand that the proper legacy of government is not money sleeping in a bank. It is development working in the streets. It exposes the folly of confusing an impressive account balance with successful government. No wonder Willie Obiano—Peter Obi’s handpicked successor, whom he personally supported into office—did not take long to[i] repudiate both the savings mythology and the man behind it.[/i] That response was politically devastating because it came not from an APC opponent, but from Obi’s own successor and former ally. When the man you selected to preserve your legacy begins dismantling your celebrated figures almost immediately after taking office, Nigerians are entitled to ask whether the story was ever as clean as it was packaged. Then came Charles Soludo, another successor, who said the much-advertised investments were worth “next to nothing.” Two successors. Two damaging rebuttals. Yet BS Peter continues to recycle the same disputed numbers as though repetition were an audit certificate. Peter Obi wants applause for leaving public money unemployed while Anambra’s development needs were queuing outside the bank. |
| Politics › Re: Peter Obi Advised From granting Interviews As "I Cut The Grass" Goes Viral by CharlesCNG: 6:12am On Jul 28 |
Lanretoye:“PETER OBI 'S FOOLISH BOAST:HOW MANY GOVERNORS SAVED LIKE ME?” —WHY WISE GOVERNORS DO NOT GOVERN LIKE BANK MANAGERS. by CharlesCNG. Peter Obi has again boasted that he left $150 million and ₦36 billion for Anambra, asking how many governors could claim the same achievement. That boast may sound impressive until his successors’ responses are examined. Willie Obiano’s administration rejected the popular claim that Obi handed over ₦75 billion in freely available cash. It reportedly distinguished between actual cash, investments and “near-cash” assets, while arguing that the incoming administration inherited projects with a total contract value reportedly reaching ₦185.1 billion. The obiano govt said approximately ₦35.1 billion was later paid on inherited projects. Charles Soludo was even more devastating. Asked about the investments credited to Obi, Soludo said that, based on what he had seen, their present value was “next to nothing.” Obi’s wider financial storytelling has also faced credibility questions. A 2025 fact-check found his repeated claim that he left Anambra without debt to be false or misleading. Yet he keeps presenting large figures as though repetition converts controversy into audited fact. The greater problem is the thinking behind the boast. A governor is not elected to behave like a bank’s fixed-deposit manager. Public money exists to provide roads, schools, hospitals, water, security, industrial infrastructure and economic opportunity. Why do “other governors” not necessarily copy Obi? Because they are not as financially foolish like him. Because a wise governor understands opportunity cost. Money sitting in a bank while erosion destroys communities, industries lack power, schools need laboratories and hospitals need equipment is not automatically prudence. It is deferred development disguised as financial brilliance. Boasting about such savings is like a father proudly displaying a fat bank balance while his failing to provide education for his children. Nobody is arguing that government should spend recklessly. Responsible governments need reserves and must avoid debt traps. But the intelligent question is not: “How much money did you leave behind?” It is: “What public value did you create, what liabilities remained, and what return did the saved money eventually produce?” Until those questions are answered with audited records, Obi’s savings boast does not establish genius. Obi seems to be too daft to understand that the proper legacy of government is not money sleeping in a bank. It is development working in the streets. It exposes the folly of confusing an impressive account balance with successful government. No wonder Willie Obiano—Peter Obi’s handpicked successor, whom he personally supported into office—did not take long to[i] repudiate both the savings mythology and the man behind it.[/i] That response was politically devastating because it came not from an APC opponent, but from Obi’s own successor and former ally. When the man you selected to preserve your legacy begins dismantling your celebrated figures almost immediately after taking office, Nigerians are entitled to ask whether the story was ever as clean as it was packaged. Then came Charles Soludo, another successor, who said the much-advertised investments were worth “next to nothing.” Two successors. Two damaging rebuttals. Yet BS Peter continues to recycle the same disputed numbers as though repetition were an audit certificate. Peter Obi wants applause for leaving public money unemployed while Anambra’s development needs were queuing outside the bank. 2 Likes 1 Share |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 6:58pm On Jul 27 |
Jossyman0007:From Consumption to Production": Blueprintless Peter's Destination Without Directions by CharlesCNG. Peter Obi's slogan, "Move Nigeria from consumption to production," CAME UNDER PROPER SCRUTINY YESTERDAY ON CHANNELS TV. and as usual, the problem is not the destination. The problem is the missing road map. During his Channels Television interview, Obi was repeatedly challenged to explain exactly how this transformation would happen. Instead, he spent much of his answer comparing Nigeria with Bangladesh, the Netherlands, Belgium, Morocco, Ethiopia and Kenya, arguing that those countries produce more despite having less land. The comparisons are interesting. They also prove that Nigeria has enormous untapped potential. But comparisons are not policies. Nigerians deserved answers to practical questions. Which crops would receive priority? How many hectares would be cultivated annually? What irrigation projects would be launched? How would farmers be protected from terrorists? What would be the financing model? What production targets would be achieved in four years? Which laws would be amended? Which ministries would drive implementation? Those questions remained unanswered. A presidential blueprint is more than describing what successful countries have done. It is explaining, in measurable terms, how Nigeria will get there. No serious observer disputes that Nigeria must produce more, process more and export more. That is common ground. The real debate is over implementation. Leadership is not merely telling Nigerians that Bangladesh produces more rice or that the Netherlands exports more agricultural products. Leadership is presenting a detailed Nigerian plan with timelines, budgets, institutions and measurable milestones. A destination inspires hope. A roadmap inspires confidence. In this interview, Nigerians heard plenty about the destination. They are still waiting for the directions. The truth no man can give what he does not have. Peter obi is[b] not fit, not qualified, not prepared, not informed, not convincing, not strategic and not presidential.[/b] |
| Politics › Re: I Feel Irritated By Peter Obi's Interview With Seun- Aisha Yesufu by CharlesCNG: 6:46pm On Jul 27 |
blamingthedevil:DEAR AISHA YUSUFF, PLS DON'T BLAME THE SALESMAN: Peter Obi's Interview Exposed the Product, Not the Interviewer. CharlesCNG. Ever noticed what happens when an overhyped product finally undergoes a proper quality inspection? The marketers don't blame the product. They blame the inspector. That is exactly what some Obidients—and now Aisha Yesufu—appear to be doing after Peter Obi's DISASTEROUS interview with Seun Okinbaloye. Instead of confronting the obvious gaps exposed during the interview, the new target has become Seun himself. Why? Because a journalist asking follow-up questions is apparently now considered an offence. Seun asked for three specific security measures. He asked how 5% loans would be financed. He asked how Nigeria would move from consumption to production. He asked about timelines, implementation and measurable outcomes. Those are not hostile questions. They are exactly the questions a presidential candidate should be prepared to answer. When broad slogans met detailed interrogation, Blueprintless Peter repeatedly struggled to move from aspiration to implementation. Now the referee is being blamed because the striker missed an open goal. The irony is that many of the same voices applauded Arise TV's Rufai Oseni when he pressed politicians they disagreed with. Tough questioning was then celebrated as fearless journalism. Today, because the questions were directed at Peter Obi, some suddenly regard rigorous interviewing as bias. That is not a consistent standard. Aisha Yesufu should face the uncomfortable possibility that the interview did not create Peter Obi's difficulties—it simply revealed them. The problem was not Seun's persistence. The problem was that several straightforward questions required straightforward answers, and too often they produced broad promises, foreign comparisons or appeals to personal commitment instead of detailed policy. A quality product does not fear inspection. Only an overhyped one does. Perhaps the greatest lesson from that interview is this: You cannot package a slogan as a blueprint forever. Eventually, someone will ask to see the engineering drawings. 27 Likes 3 Shares |
| Politics › Re: Rufai Oseni Pissed Off Over Peter Obi's Interview by CharlesCNG: 6:24pm On Jul 27 |
harsysky:You have misunderstood the burden in an election involving an incumbent. President Tinubu already has a governing blueprint in operation. Nigerians may support it, criticise it or demand improvements, but its direction is visible in actual policies. On the economy, the administration removed fuel subsidy, ended the multiple exchange-rate system, reformed taxation and increased revenue flowing to states and local governments. On electricity, Tinubu signed the Electricity Act, allowing states to generate, transmit and distribute power through decentralised electricity markets. The administration is also addressing metering and legacy power-sector debts. On federalism, his government initiated the court action that produced the Supreme Court judgment affirming local-government financial autonomy. On security, the government has pursued additional military and police recruitment while advancing the constitutional framework for state police. These measures have not yet solved insecurity, but they reveal the administration’s chosen direction. Therefore, the opposition’s responsibility is not merely to say, “Tinubu is failing.” It must present a superior alternative. Will Peter Obi restore petrol subsidy or retain its removal? Will he reverse exchange-rate unification? What will replace the current tax reforms? How will his security architecture differ? How will he finance and deliver 10,000MW? Which Tinubu policies will he cancel, modify or continue? You asked which candidate has presented clear plans. That question does not rescue Obi; it indicts the entire opposition. A challenger cannot ask Nigerians to remove an incumbent whose policies are visible and replace him with a candidate whose programme remains hidden. It is like asking passengers to abandon a moving bus for another vehicle whose driver refuses to reveal the route, fuel level or destination. Tinubu must defend his record. But Obi must explain the alternative. “Vote for me first; discover my blueprint later” is not opposition politics. It is political blind dating. 167 Likes 18 Shares |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 5:40pm On Jul 27 |
Jossyman0007:COMPARATIVE-COUNTRY PETER: Bangladesh Is Not a Nigerian Blueprint. by CharlesCNG. One of the recurring features of Peter Obi's interview with Seun Okinbaloye was his fascination with comparing Nigeria to other countries. Bangladesh. The Netherlands. Belgium. Morocco. Ethiopia. Vietnam. Almost every difficult economic question was answered with another international comparison. There is nothing wrong with learning from successful countries. Every serious government does. The problem is when comparison replaces implementation. This is why I call him Comparative-Country Peter. Asked how Nigeria would move from consumption to production... He took Nigerians to Bangladesh. Asked about agriculture... He travelled to the Netherlands. Asked about exports... He boarded another flight. By the end of the interview, Nigerians had completed a world tour without seeing a detailed Nigerian implementation plan. Bangladesh did not become Bangladesh because another country admired it. Vietnam did not industrialise because politicians kept mentioning its name on television. Those countries transformed through years of deliberate policies, sector-specific reforms, infrastructure investment, export incentives, education, stable institutions and measurable execution. That was the missing ingredient in the interview. How will Nigeria adapt those lessons to its own realities? What happens first? Which sectors receive priority? What legislation will be introduced? How much will implementation cost? Which ministry leads the reforms? How will success be measured after one year, two years and four years? Those questions remained unanswered. Again, Blueprintless Peter knew the destination. Again, Comparative-Country Peter knew the examples. But examples are not blueprints. Quoting Bangladesh is not an agricultural policy. Mentioning Vietnam is not an industrial strategy. Referring to the Netherlands is not an export programme. Leadership is not measured by the number of countries you can reference. It is measured by your ability to translate their lessons into a practical Nigerian roadmap. Until that roadmap is presented, Comparative-Country Peter remains exactly that—a tour guide through other nations' success stories, while Nigerians continue waiting for the blueprint for their own. |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 5:33pm On Jul 27 |
franchasng:In the interview , this one more proof that Peter obi is vacuous. When he was asked that question, his response in my view was a missed opportunity. The accusation against Peter Obi has long centred on claims that he deported or discriminated against northern residents in Anambra. During the interview, instead of addressing those allegations directly with documented facts—such as government records, court decisions, testimonies from affected communities, or specific policy actions—he pointed to the religious identity of some senior security officials. Those are not the same issue. Appointing Muslim security officers may be relevant evidence against claims of religious bias, but it does not by itself answer allegations concerning the treatment of ordinary northern residents. Likewise, it is worth remembering that Commissioners of Police are appointed and posted by the Nigeria Police Force, not selected by state governors. So the fact that Muslim CPs served in Anambra under Obi is not, by itself, evidence of his appointment policy or inclusiveness. |
| Politics › Re: "I've Changed Party 3 Times Because Everywhere I Go, They Destroy It"- Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 5:23pm On Jul 27 |
Olofofo247ng:PLATFORM PILGRIM PETER: Can a Man Build Institutions by Constantly Leaving Them? Peter Obi says in the yesterday interview with seun that one of his biggest goals is to build strong institutions rather than strong personalities. The question is whether his own political journey reflects it. Over the years, Obi has moved through multiple political platforms, explaining each departure as a response to circumstances beyond his control. During his interview with Seun Okinbaloye, he again defended changing parties by arguing that the platforms had deviated from their founding ideals. That explanation may satisfy some supporters. But it also raises an uncomfortable question. If every political platform eventually becomes unsuitable, why does the solution always seem to be leaving rather than reforming it from within? This is why the label Platform Pilgrim Peter continues to resonate. Institution builders don't merely join institutions; they strengthen them. They fight internal battles, build consensus, reform party structures and leave behind stronger organisations. Political parties are institutions too. If every disagreement ends with another political migration, voters are entitled to ask whether the commitment is to[i] institutional development or simply to the next available platform.[/i] Nigeria certainly needs stronger institutions. On that point, there is broad agreement. But building institutions requires patience, negotiation, compromise and long-term investment. Those qualities are tested most when institutions become difficult—not when it is convenient to move elsewhere. Again, the interview exposed a familiar pattern from Blueprintless Peter. He spoke about institutional governance. He spoke less about how institutions are strengthened from within when they fall short of expectations. The question is not whether politicians have the right to change parties. They do. The question Nigerians should ask , and are asking , is this: Can someone convincingly preach institutional stability while repeatedly seeking political stability through institutional exit? Peter Obi’s pathetic interview yesterday proves he is not fit, not qualified, not prepared, not informed, not convincing, not strategic and not presidential. 7 Likes 2 Shares |
| Politics › Re: Rufai Oseni Pissed Off Over Peter Obi's Interview by CharlesCNG: 5:13pm On Jul 27 |
chopnaira: 117 Likes 7 Shares |
| Politics › Re: "I WON 2023!"so Peter Where Is The Alternative National Result? by CharlesCNG(op): 4:52pm On Jul 27 |
SeeWahala:Ah, I just noticed it is you, my good friend. See me see wahala. How are you today? But seriously, even if I push trucks at Iddo or sell bales at Aswani Market, does that disqualify me from exercising my democratic right to free speech? In fact, you should commend such a truck pusher for finding time after honest labour to participate in national debate. Or is political opinion now reserved for people with air-conditioned offices and imported titles? And this obsession with whether I am paid is becoming funny. Suppose I am paid ₦3,000 per day. Does that make a true statement false? Suppose I post for free. Does that automatically make my argument intelligent? Suppose I sell Pepsi and Sprite. Will Peter Obi’s missing blueprint suddenly appear inside the refrigerator? You are like a man who cannot answer the town crier, so he begins investigating whether the gong was bought on credit. What exactly is the problem? Is it my occupation? My supposed payment? The number of threads? Or the fact that the message keeps making you uncomfortable? If the thread has no engagement, ignore it. If the facts are wrong, correct them. If the argument is weak, demolish it. But telling me to push trucks is not a rebuttal. It is merely class prejudice wearing a comedian’s cap. So, my friend, allow the imaginary truck pusher to speak. Nigeria belongs to him too. Now leave Iddo, Aswani, Pepsi, Sprite and mysterious covens aside. Face the message. Because you obidients like it or not , the message will keep coming. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: "I WON 2023!"so Peter Where Is The Alternative National Result? by CharlesCNG(op): 4:42pm On Jul 27 |
Streetinvestor2:My friend, before lecturing me about a “glitch,” understand that I have worked as an IT consultant for decades. I know that a system malfunction is possible. But a glitch is not magical evidence that your preferred candidate won. Here is how the process worked: Votes were counted openly at each polling unit. The figures were manually entered on Form EC8A, signed by officials and party agents, and copies were issued to the agents. The presiding officer then used the BVAS to photograph and upload that same EC8A to IReV. INEC itself describes BVAS as storing and transmitting an image of the polling-unit result sheet. Therefore, IReV did not count the votes. It displayed photographic copies of results already counted and recorded physically. Yes, the delayed presidential uploads were unacceptable. INEC admitted that the presidential portal experienced a configuration problem while the National Assembly uploads proceeded, and that failure understandably created suspicion. It is like a bank app delaying your transaction alert: the delay deserves investigation, but it does not prove that the balance belongs to somebody else. If Obi’s agents possessed their EC8A copies, where is the nationwide alternative collation showing: * the polling units where figures changed; * the authentic signed results; * the number of votes removed from Obi; * the number added to Tinubu; * and the corrected national total? Obi challenged the election through the tribunal, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. The courts did not hold that he won but was prevented from proving it merely because INEC withheld machines. The legal challenges arising from the transmission failure were ultimately dismissed. You also claim BVAS machines were withheld to “erase evidence.” Calibrating a BVAS for a later election does not erase the paper EC8A copies already held by parties, polling agents and INEC. If you allege deliberate deletion, present the forensic report establishing it. INEC deserved serious criticism for the failed real-time upload. But the burden remains on whoever says Obi won to reconstruct the result from the polling-unit records. Now finally ,Focus on your own life—and, more importantly, focus on the message. Whether I am paid, unpaid, self-employed or posting for personal interest has absolutely nothing to do with whether the facts and arguments in my posts are correct. Does an argument suddenly become false because the writer was paid? Does Peter Obi’s missing blueprint appear because you have invented a salary for his critic? Does the INEC glitch become proof of victory because you have calculated imaginary posting fees? No. This obsession with my supposed payment is merely an escape route from the substance of the discussion. So bring the EC8As, identify the altered figures and calculate the supposed victory. A glitch explains a technical failure. It does not manufacture millions of missing votes. |
| Politics › Re: Peter Obi Outlines Strategy To Lower Interest Rates And Support Farmers by CharlesCNG: 3:53pm On Jul 27 |
davenews:FIVE-PERCENT LOANS? WHO PAYS THE BILL? by CharlesCNG One of Peter Obi's biggest economic promises during his interview with Seun Okinbaloye was that Nigerian businesses should be able to borrow at around 5% interest. It sounds attractive. After all, every entrepreneur wants cheaper credit. But Seun asked the question every economist should ask: "How?" That is where Blueprintless Peter appeared once again. The destination was beautiful. The road map never arrived. Interest rates are not reduced by presidential speeches. They reflect inflation, monetary policy, exchange-rate stability, government borrowing, banking risks and the overall cost of capital. If commercial banks are lending at 25% to 35%, who absorbs the remaining 20 to 30 percentage points? The taxpayer? The Central Bank? Commercial banks? A special intervention fund? Foreign development partners? The interview supplied no financing model. This is what has become the trademark of BS Peter. The promise sounds wonderful until someone asks who will write the cheque. No serious economist disputes that Nigeria needs cheaper credit. The disagreement is over implementation. Will inflation first be reduced? Will government borrowing be cut to lower interest rates? Will the CBN change its monetary policy? Will there be targeted sectoral loans instead of economy-wide lending? Those are the questions Nigerians expected a presidential candidate to answer. Instead, they got another destination without directions. Anyone can promise 5% loans. The real test is explaining who pays the difference and[b] how the policy remains sustainable without creating another subsidy or distorting the financial system.[/b] In economics, every subsidy has a sponsor. During the interview, Peter Obi announced the subsidy. He never identified the sponsor. |
| Politics › Re: "I WON 2023!"so Peter Where Is The Alternative National Result? by CharlesCNG(op): 3:31pm On Jul 27 |
SeeWahala:It used to be ₦30,000 per month. Now you have announced a new rate of ₦500 per post and ₦3,000 per thread. At this rate, imagine how much I must have made today already. Unfortunately for your conspiracy theory, I am an employer of labour, and none of my staff earns below ₦70,000 monthly. So the idea that I am struggling for imaginary crumbs to discuss Peter Obi is more flattering to your imagination than it is insulting to me. But let us ask the real question: Why are Obidients always more interested in the messenger than the message? Why not respond to the argument? Why not disprove the figures? Why not defend Obi’s statements? Why not simply ignore the thread if it irritates you? Instead, every difficult question about Obi produces the same tired allegation: “You are paid.” That is like a man losing an argument in court and accusing the microphone of collecting a salary. Whether I am paid, unpaid, employed, self-employed or posting from the moon does not change the substance of the discussion. If the argument is wrong, refute it. If the facts are false, correct them. If the criticism is unfair, expose it. But when your only response is to invent payment rates, you are quietly admitting that you have no answer to the message. So forget the imaginary payroll. Face the argument. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: "I WON 2023!"so Peter Where Is The Alternative National Result? by CharlesCNG(op): 3:21pm On Jul 27 |
Streetinvestor2:There goes the standard Obidient escape route again: First, claim Peter Obi won the 2023 election. When asked for proof, shout “INEC glitch—go and verify!” When the figures still do not support the claim, accuse everyone discussing Obi of being paid. That is not evidence. It is conspiracy replacing argument. The original issue is Peter Obi’s continued suggestion that he won the 2023 presidential election. If you believe an INEC glitch changed the result, present the precise evidence: Which polling units were affected? What were the authentic figures? How many votes were allegedly removed from Obi? How many were added to another candidate? What would the corrected national totals be? A technical failure in transmitting some results electronically is not automatic proof that Obi won. Election results were still recorded on physical forms, collated through the statutory process and subjected to legal challenges. Obi went to court. He had lawyers, witnesses and access to election materials. Yet he did not produce evidence sufficient to establish that he scored the highest lawful votes and satisfied the constitutional requirements for victory. And please stop assuming that anyone criticising Obi must be paid. That is like a football supporter claiming the referee, spectators and scoreboard operator were bribed simply because his team lost. People discuss Obi because he remains politically active, grants interviews and repeatedly makes claims that invite scrutiny. So forget who opened the thread and answer the question: Where is the verifiable evidence that Peter Obi won the 2023 presidential election? “INEC glitch” is not a result sheet. “Go and verify” is not proof. And accusing critics of being paid is not a substitute for evidence. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: Peter Obi Just Confirmed Power Generation Problems Can't Be Solved In 4 Years by CharlesCNG: 3:09pm On Jul 27 |
9jatriot:Your defence defeats itself. You admit there is a limit to how much electricity can be delivered within four years because generation depends on factors such as gas supply, transmission, distribution, metering, tariffs and sector liquidity. Wonderful. Why did Peter Obi not explain those limitations before announcing 10,000MW as though megawatts were campaign souvenirs? Why did the complexity suddenly become obvious only when an interviewer asked, “How?” A prepared candidate studies the constraints before making the promise. He does not announce the destination and discover the missing bridge when Seun corners him with follow-up questions. Nigeria already has about 13,625MW of installed grid-connected capacity, yet only an average of 4,286MW was available for dispatch in April 2026. The real challenge is making existing plants operational, supplying sufficient gas, expanding transmission, strengthening distribution and restoring financial stability. And since you asked what Tinubu has done: * Signed the Electricity Act 2023, decentralising the market and allowing states to regulate electricity within their territories. * Revived the Siemens Presidential Power Initiative; commissioned 10 mobile substations and 10 power transformers, adding a reported 984MVA to transmission capacity. * Approved refinancing of ₦4 trillion in historic debts owed largely to 27 generating companies. * Approved ₦185 billion toward longstanding gas debts to improve fuel supply to power plants. * Reformed tariffs for higher-consuming customers, increasing market revenue by about ₦700 billion and reducing the subsidy shortfall from ₦3 trillion to ₦1.9 trillion. Has Tinubu solved electricity? No. Generation remains inadequate, gas supply recently met only about 43% of power plants’ requirements, and implementation must move faster. But these are concrete interventions across the entire electricity chain. As for interviews and name-calling, that is another diversion. Tinubu’s interview schedule cannot manufacture the details missing from Obi’s promise. And the claim that Tinubu is waiting to “steal” Obi’s ideas is particularly funny. How do you steal a blueprint its owner refuses to reveal and apparently cannot explain? Nobody is hunting Obi for ideas. Nigerians are simply asking him to defend the megawatt figure he voluntarily announced. Once again: Where is the plan? |
| Politics › Re: Peter Obi Just Confirmed Power Generation Problems Can't Be Solved In 4 Years by CharlesCNG: 2:57pm On Jul 27 |
Abufo:THE “$12 BILLION ROAD TO NOWHERE” CLAIM IS POLITICAL ACCOUNTING TO NOWHERE. Calling the Lagos–Calabar Coastal Highway a “$12 billion road to nowhere” is a clever slogan built on financial distortion. First, the Federal Government did[b] not[/b] simply withdraw $12 billion and hand it to a contractor. The entire 700-kilometre corridor has been estimated at about $11 billion, to be developed in phases over roughly eight years. The financing already secured has also been tied to specific sections: $747 million was raised through a Deutsche Bank-led syndicate for the initial 47.47-kilometre section. Another $1.126 billion financing package was closed for Phase One, Section Two. That is project financing—not a mysterious $12 billion budget line. Second, where exactly is “nowhere”? The highway is designed to connect Lagos with Calabar through the coastal corridor, linking communities and economic centres across Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Edo, Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers, Akwa Ibom and Cross River. It is intended to improve access to ports, industrial zones, agricultural areas and tourism destinations. The road is also not an ordinary strip of asphalt. The initial section includes six concrete lanes, shore protection, drainage and lighting. The Works Minister placed the comparable two-lane-equivalent cost at about ₦7.5 billion per kilometre. That government calculation should be independently audited, but critics cannot honestly compare it with the cost of a basic two-lane inland road. There are legitimate questions: Was procurement sufficiently competitive? Are compensation and environmental protections adequate? Will toll revenue cover maintenance and debt obligations? Will every section be completed on schedule? Those are serious accountability questions. But “road to nowhere” is not analysis. It is like calling a bridge useless because construction has not yet reached the opposite bank. The emerging Obidient strategy for 2027 is obvious: repeat the largest possible dollar figure, conceal the phased financing, ignore the road’s width and coastal engineering, and pretend that nine southern states lead nowhere. As usual opposition / obidients is driving its argument on a road paved with misinformation and Propaganda. |
| Politics › Re: Peter Obi Just Confirmed Power Generation Problems Can't Be Solved In 4 Years by CharlesCNG: 2:35pm On Jul 27 |
lexylaw09:POWER PROMISE IN RETREAT: Blueprintless Peter Discovers Reality on Channels by CharlesCNG. Only weeks ago, Peter Obi mounted the campaign stage and promised that, within four years, Nigeria would generate, transmit and distribute at least 10,000 megawatts of electricity. Then Seun Okinbaloye brought out the dangerous weapon every slogan fears: A follow-up question. Seun asked for a realistic timeline for reliable, stable, 24-hour electricity. Suddenly, Megawatt Peter became Maybe-Watt Peter. His answer? “Reliable, stable 24-hour electricity within four years is impossible.” Interesting. When there was a microphone, a convention crowd and applause, four years sounded like enough time to transform electricity. When Seun requested implementation details, four years suddenly became too short because power plants and transmission lines take years to build. Obi still repeated the 10,000 MW target—but then said Nigeria already generates more than 10,000 MW and merely fails to transmit it. SOMEONE FINALLY TOLD HIM THE OBVIOUS HE DID KNOW EARLIER? So what exactly is the promise? To generate 10,000 MW? To add 10,000 MW? Or to transmit capacity supposedly already available? This is classic BS Peter. First comes the magnificent destination. Then comes the interview. Then comes the explanation that the destination is impossible within the advertised timetable. Nobody faults Obi for acknowledging that national power reform takes time. That is reality. The problem is that reality seems to arrive only after the campaign slogan has collected its applause. With Blueprintless Peter, electricity promises travel at 10,000 megawatts. The details arrive by candlelight. “Blueprintless Peter does not yet have a power plan; he has a megawatt slogan. |
| Politics › "I WON 2023!"so Peter Where Is The Alternative National Result? by CharlesCNG(op): 2:21pm On Jul 27 |
Throughout his interview with Seun Okinbaloye, Peter Obi maintained that he won the 2023 presidential election and remains the rightful choice of Nigerians. That is a serious claim. It therefore deserves serious evidence. In every democratic election, there are only two ways to establish victory. Either the officially declared results are accepted, or an alternative set of verifiable results is produced to show where the declared figures are wrong. This is where hyperbole Peter runs into another credibility problem. More than three years after the election, Nigerians are still waiting for a polling-unit-by-polling-unit alternative national result proving that he scored the constitutional majority required to be declared president. Which states were wrongly computed? Which local governments were manipulated? Which polling units changed the national outcome? By how many votes? Those are the questions that remain unanswered. Repeating "I won" is not the same as demonstrating how the victory was mathematically achieved. Elections are ultimately decided by verifiable figures, not conviction. If the official declaration was fundamentally wrong, Nigerians deserve to see a complete alternative computation supported by polling-unit results, state totals and constitutional spread—not merely repeated assertions. This article is not about denying anyone the right to challenge an election. Every candidate has that right. It is about the burden of proof. The more extraordinary the claim, the stronger the evidence required. After years of hearing "I won," Nigerians are entitled to ask one simple question: Where is the alternative national result that proves it? An honest man - and lying peter is anything BUT - who contests an election and loses may disagree with the result, challenge it in court and continue to advocate for reforms. He does not make claiming victory a permanent political strategy after the legal process has run its course. Democracy is sustained not only by the ability to contest elections, but also by the willingness to accept their final outcome once every constitutional avenue has been exhausted. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: Asked For Three Security Solutions, Peter Obi Offered Three Emotions Instead. by CharlesCNG(op): 1:58pm On Jul 27 |
zoedew:My Brother, make me too use grammar scater ground. Peter Obi is not only politically vacuous, vague and built on shifting sand; he is also thin on substance, slippery under scrutiny and permanently allergic to detail. He is not only uncertain in policy, evasive in explanation and inconsistent in position; he is also a catalogue of promises without procedures, slogans without structure and ambition without architecture. He is not only a moving target, a foggy proposition and a political question mark; he is also the candidate who becomes less convincing the more he is asked to explain himself. Peter Obi’s greatest political weakness is not that he lacks words. It is that after all the words, Nigerians are still left searching for the plan. Henceforth, he shall be called blueprintless Peter. Nigeria is not looking for a national commentator. It is looking for a president with a blueprint. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 1:46pm On Jul 27 |
Jossyman0007:Obidient sees superior logic and immediately begins shouting: “Na AI! Na AI!” That is like a student who cannot solve an equation accusing the calculator of intimidation. You first claimed I did not watch the interview. I then responded to the exact points Peter Obi made—agriculture, manufacturing, affordable credit, security, power and foreign comparisons—and asked you to identify the detailed blueprint you claimed he revealed. Instead of answering, you ran from the argument and started discussing how the response was written. Whether a point was typed with a pen, phone, laptop or artificial intelligence does not determine whether it is true. Refute the substance. Show us where Obi explained: * his security command structure; * his intelligence-reform programme; * the cost and funding of his proposals; * his power-generation targets; * his agricultural implementation timetable; * and his measurable four-year outcomes. You said he revealed “too much information.” I asked you to present that information. Your response was: “AI response!” That is not critical thinking. That is intellectual surrender dressed as technological suspicion. You cannot accuse someone of not watching an interview, receive a detailed breakdown of the interview, and then refuse to answer because the breakdown is too organised for your comfort. It is like challenging someone to a race and then complaining that his shoes are too good when he overtakes you. Yeye Obidient, forget the messenger and face the message. Peter Obi spoke for a long time, but length is not depth, aspiration is not architecture, and foreign examples are not an implementation plan. So, one more time: Where is the blueprint? Until you provide it, shouting “AI” is merely the digital version of covering your ears and running away from an argument you started. 1 Like 1 Share |
| Politics › Re: Another Disgrace Interview By Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 1:36pm On Jul 27 |
franchasng:A presidential candidate asking Nigerians for their votes while hiding his blueprint is like a contractor demanding full payment but refusing to show the building plan. Is that leadership—or political hide-and-seek? You say Tinubu is searching for Obi’s blueprint to copy. Which blueprint? The invisible one? The one locked inside a spiritual briefcase? The one voters must elect him first before they are allowed to see? That is a joke. BLUEPRINTLESS Peter does not have one! A candidate’s blueprint is not a secret examination answer. It is the evidence voters need to judge whether he understands the problems, has workable solutions and deserves public trust. Meanwhile, the “Bulaba blueprint” you mock is already producing policies in the open: Fuel-subsidy removal. Foreign-exchange reform. Student loans. Tax restructuring. Local-government autonomy. Electricity decentralisation. Higher allocations to states and councils. Major road and rail projects. State-police constitutional reform. Peter Obi, after years of campaigning, is still telling Nigerians to trust promises whose details must apparently remain classified. So let us understand the arrangement: Tinubu must publish, explain and defend every policy. But Obi should receive the presidency first and reveal his plan later? That is like marrying a stranger because he promises to disclose his identity after the wedding. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: Another Disgrace Interview By Peter Obi by CharlesCNG: 10:44am On Jul 27 |
helinues:BLUEPRINTLESS PETER 'S MANIFESTO STILL BEING UPDATED... AFTER YEARS OF CAMPAIGNING? by CharlesCNG . One moment in Peter Obi's interview with Seun Okinbaloye should worry even his most loyal supporters. Asked about his policy programme, Obi explained that his 2023 manifesto is still being updated because situations have changed and new realities have emerged. That answer raises an uncomfortable question. After years of campaigning, years of criticizing successive governments and years of insisting Nigeria is on the wrong path, why is the blueprint still under construction? Every serious leader should naturally refine policies as circumstances evolve. But there is a world of difference between updating a manifesto and still developing one. This is the recurring problem with Blueprintless Peter. When asked about security, the blueprint wasn't ready for public discussion. When asked about production, the destination was clear but the implementation remained vague. When asked about economic reforms, the broad vision came first while the details seemed permanently "work in progress." Now even the manifesto itself is still being updated. At what point does "updating" become an excuse for not providing measurable commitments? Presidential campaigns are supposed to culminate in a finished programme of government—not a document perpetually under revision. Businesses do not appoint CEOs who promise to develop the business plan after assuming office. Airlines do not ask passengers to board first before deciding the flight path. Likewise, Nigerians should not be expected to elect a president whose governing document appears to remain in draft form years after he first sought the office. A manifesto is not merely a campaign brochure. It is a contract with the electorate. And contracts inspire confidence only when the terms are already written—not when they are still being edited. That interview left Nigerians with one unavoidable impression: The campaign is permanent. The blueprint is perpetually "coming soon." |
| Politics › Re: Asked For Three Security Solutions, Peter Obi Offered Three Emotions Instead. by CharlesCNG(op): 10:38am On Jul 27 |
Sheuns:Is this a joke? A man wants to become president of a country battling terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and organised crime, and your position is: “He said he will end it. How is not your problem”? So Nigerians should hand him the keys to the country and wait for the miracle? That argument is like giving a blindfolded driver a bus full of passengers because he confidently promised to reach the destination. Of course, the “how” is our problem. The how is the basic question seun asked blueprintless Peter. What is his policing strategy? What intelligence reforms will he introduce? How will he secure Nigeria’s borders? What role will state police play? How will he confront kidnapping networks, terrorist financing and arms trafficking? What will it cost, and what results should Nigerians expect within one, two and four years? And please, spare us the “wait for the manifesto” excuse. Peter Obi has been campaigning for the presidency since 2022. After years of speeches, interviews and rallies, Nigerians must still wait for another party document before discovering how he intends to address the country’s biggest crisis? A manifesto should expand a candidate’s ideas, not manufacture them from nothing. Anyone can say, “I will end insecurity.” A serious candidate explains the strategy. A prepared candidate provides priorities. A qualified candidate answers the question. Only a political magician asks Nigerians to applaud the promise and avoid looking inside the hat. 1 Like 1 Share |
| Politics › Re: Asked For Three Security Solutions, Peter Obi Offered Three Emotions Instead. by CharlesCNG(op): 10:32am On Jul 27 |
zoghys:Your argument contains legitimate concerns, but it also avoids the central question. I will take your points one by one. 1. “Subsidy should have been removed gradually.” Gradually over what period—and at what cost? The 2023 budget provided about ₦3.36 trillion for petrol subsidy only until June 2023. Nigeria was borrowing heavily to maintain a system that encouraged smuggling, rewarded importers and consumed more than major social-sector spending. Peter Obi’s “gradual removal” is basically academic, otherwise he never clearly stated the duration, annual cost, pricing stages or source of financing. Would petrol rise monthly, quarterly or yearly? How many additional trillions would government borrow during this gradual process? Blueprintless Peter did not state because he has not thought it through. More importantly, this argument is now historical. The subsidy has already been removed. If Obi becomes president in 2027, will he restore it? If not, what exactly will he do differently? Now to your second point, “The savings should subsidise food and the wider economy.” The problem with promising to replace fuel subsidy with another elaborate system of targeted food, transport or income subsidies is that Nigeria’s institutions have repeatedly shown how easily such schemes can be captured and abused. Subsidies do not automatically fail everywhere, but in a country with weak identification systems, opaque procurement, political patronage and poor monitoring, they frequently benefit middlemen more than the intended citizens. That was exactly what happened under the multiple exchange-rate regime. The official rate was supposedly designed to provide cheaper foreign exchange for essential imports and productive sectors. In practice, privileged individuals obtained subsidised dollars and diverted them, inflated invoices or resold the currency at the parallel-market rate. The benefit rarely reached the ordinary consumer through lower prices. It is true, that subsidy savings have not simply disappeared. Higher revenue helped increase transfers to states and councils, while fiscal reforms raised government revenue by about 4.5% of GDP in 2024 and reduced the deficit from 5.4% of GDP in 2023 to roughly 3% in 2024. The proper criticism is that the relief reaching households has been too slow—not that no fiscal improvement occurred. To your third point “Every move is about re-election and one-party rule.” That is an allegation, not proof. Tinubu has publicly rejected one-party government. Opposition defections are politically concerning and institutions must remain independent, but politicians voluntarily abandoning weakened parties cannot automatically be presented as presidential dictatorship. To your fourth point “Insecurity has never been this bad.” Insecurity remains severe and criticism is justified. ACLED recorded 7,127 security incidents between January 2024 and August 2025. But “never been this bad in history” requires comparison with the peak Boko Haram years, when entire towns were occupied, territories seized and mass-casualty attacks occurred regularly. Present insecurity is widespread and unacceptable, but exaggeration is not analysis. The administration must improve intelligence, policing, border control and protection of farming communities. Its recent approval to expand the Army from eight to twelve divisions and recruit 28,000 additional personnel is a significant response, though results—not announcements—must be the final test. You may dislike Tinubu’s methods, but the reforms have produced measurable fiscal and macroeconomic changes. Now return to the unanswered question: Since subsidy removal is already a completed fact, what would blueprintless Peter Obi actually do in 2027? Restore subsidy? Keep the present system? Reverse exchange-rate reforms? Reduce allocations to states? Or merely claim he would have implemented yesterday’s decision more elegantly? Nigeria cannot elect a president based on a retrospective theory of how another president should have acted four years earlier. It needs a precise programme for the country that will exist in 2027—not an academic correction of May 2023. Blueprintless Peter is unfit, unprepared and full of BS. That's most people take away from the interview. Honestly, who ever advised him to grant a long interview with seun must be working for Tinubu. |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 8:18am On Jul 27 |
Righteousness2:You , and your fellow obidients must be suffering what is called the delusion of the grandeur. In the interview, what most objective observer saw was a man not qualified, not prepared, not informed, not convincing, not strategic, not detailed, not realistic, not presidential, not dependable and not ready to govern a country as complex as Nigeria. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 8:15am On Jul 27 |
Jossyman0007:PLATFORM PILGRIM PETER: Can a Man Build Institutions by Constantly Leaving Them? by CharlesCNG Peter Obi says, during yesterday's interview with channels that one of his biggest goals is to build strong institutions rather than strong personalities. The question : Why are you Platform Pilgrim Peter ? The question is whether his own political journey reflects someone desirous of building strong institutions. Over the years, Obi has moved through multiple political platforms, explaining each departure as a response to circumstances beyond his control. During his interview with Seun Okinbaloye, he again defended changing parties by arguing that the platforms had deviated from their founding ideals. That explanation may satisfy some supporters. But it also raises an uncomfortable question. If every political platform eventually becomes unsuitable, why does the solution always seem to be leaving rather than reforming it from within? This is why the label Platform Pilgrim Peter continues to resonate. Institution builders don't merely join institutions; they strengthen them. They fight internal battles, build consensus, reform party structures and leave behind stronger organisations. This is what tinubu did throughout his political career. Political parties are institutions too. If every disagreement ends with another political migration, voters are entitled to ask whether the commitment is to institutional development or simply to the next available platform. Nigeria certainly needs stronger institutions. On that point, there is broad agreement. But building institutions requires patience, negotiation, compromise and long-term investment. Those qualities are tested most when institutions become difficult—not when it is convenient to move elsewhere. Again, the interview exposed a familiar pattern from Blueprintless Peter. He spoke about institutional governance. He spoke less about how institutions are strengthened from within when they fall short of expectations. The question is not whether politicians have the right to change parties. They do. The question Nigerians should ask and are asking is this: Can someone convincingly preach institutional stability while repeatedly seeking political stability through institutional exit? The answer is no. Again , i repeat the obvious :the interview, exposes a man not qualified, not prepared, not informed, not convincing, not strategic, not detailed, not realistic, not presidential, not dependable and not ready to govern a country as complex as Nigeria. |
| Politics › Re: How Many Of You Watched Peter Obi's Interview On Politics Today With Seun? by CharlesCNG: 8:05am On Jul 27 |
Jossyman0007:It is obvious that you watched the interview through Obidient excitement rather than policy scrutiny. Peter Obi certainly spoke at length. He mentioned agriculture, manufacturing, small businesses, affordable credit, education and poverty reduction. On each of the above, i can see how tinubu is doing it. The question is how will peter obi and any opposition do it diffrently. Listing desirable outcomes is not the same thing as providing the detailed blueprint you claim he revealed. On security, Obi said poverty and lack of education fuel criminality, promised to be personally involved and declared that he would do “whatever it takes.” Those are sentiments—not an operational security plan. He did not clearly explain the command structure, intelligence reforms, policing model, funding requirements, border-security strategy or measurable four-year targets. On the economy, he said production would begin with agriculture, followed by manufacturing and private-sector support. But when would this begin? How much public financing would be required? Which institutions would provide affordable credit? What would replace current revenue reforms? What are the annual production, employment and export targets? Those details were not supplied. Citing Bangladesh’s rice production, Dutch agricultural exports and Indonesia’s small businesses may illustrate possibilities. It does not automatically become a Nigerian implementation programme. And please stop dragging Tinubu into every uncomfortable discussion about Obi. This thread concerns Peter Obi’s interview with Seun Okinbaloye on July 26, 2026. Whether Tinubu grants another interview does not insert the missing details into Obi’s answers. You claimed Obi “gave away too much information.” Very well: provide the precise security architecture, power-sector funding plan, implementation timetable and measurable targets he supposedly revealed. Otherwise, what you heard was not a blueprint. It was a familiar collection of aspirations, foreign comparisons and promises missing the essential question: How, precisely, will Peter Obi do it? Frankly, Honestly, whoever advised Peter Obi to grant that interview must be working for Tinubu. Or was he advised by that mad man in upper iweka onitsha. It was not an interview. It was a harvest of Peter Obi demarketing material. 1 Like 1 Share |
| Politics › Re: Asked For Three Security Solutions, Peter Obi Offered Three Emotions Instead. by CharlesCNG(op): 7:54am On Jul 27 |
zoedew:So, suddenly, this is what the defence has been reduced to? Peter Obi was asked direct questions and failed to provide convincing answers, but instead of defending what he said, you are now quarrelling over whether the interview was recorded or live. That is like a student failing an examination and blaming the wall clock in the examination hall. Whether the programme was live, recorded, premiered or replayed does not change Peter Obi’s responses. Channels Television did not force him to speak vaguely. Seun Okinbaloye did not prevent him from presenting a detailed security blueprint. Editing did not remove plans that were never stated. Unless there is evidence that his answers were materially altered, the accusation of “fraud” is merely another attempt to shift attention from the political damage caused by the interview. Instead of answering these questions, his defenders have moved from praising the interview to attacking the interviewer, the station and the format. That retreat alone tells the story. The interview was not damaging because it was recorded. It was damaging because Peter Obi was exposed as unprepared, vague and blueprintless. Frankly, whoever advised Peter Obi to grant that interview must be working for Tinubu. It was not an interview. It was a harvest of Peter Obi demarketing material. 1 Like 1 Share |
that's how your colleague DomPerignon was going on about until we discovered he was just a usual Pepsi and sprite seller 
thread wey no get better engagement na waste for una coven so no pay 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 48 pages)