₦airaland Forum

Mrexcell:
Tinibu is politically smarter but yet very scared of obi that doesn't even have any governor or war chest like ur tinibu have? Tinubu will definitely go down in nigeria's political history as the weakest president that's so scared of any kind of opposition that he used every political trick that's known to mankind to make sure he finally becomes the only credible presidential candidate on the ballot.

Nobody is afraid of Peter Obi. The problem is that Persecution Peter has confused his followers with endless victimhood until every normal political difficulty now looks like an assassination attempt.

A man with no governor, no serious national structure, no Senate bloc, no House bloc, no stable party platform and no clear northern pathway is not the monster under Tinubu’s bed.

Defeat is staring Panic Peter in the face so clearly that he has turned his 2027 he is now a candidate Who Campaigns With A Handkerchief.

Every party crisis is “they are after me.”
Every legal issue is “they don’t want me on the ballot.”
Every airport parking fine is persecution.
Every critic is paid.
Every question is demarketing.

Tinubu is not scared of Obi. Pity-Party Peter is scared of the arithmetic: weak structure, unstable platform, shrinking novelty, hostile northern terrain, and supporters who insult the same voters they need.

So let us stop confusing fear with scrutiny.

Nobody is trembling before Obi.

People are simply refusing to allow Pity-Party Peter turn political unpreparedness into national persecution drama.

Burob:
We are still waiting for his cho cho cho boy Gringory Obi’s own statement on the release of the abducted kids, instead the Agulu messiah is yapping about his car being clamped @ the airport .

Trust him, he may still come out with one careless statement soon — not to celebrate the rescue properly, but to find a way to squeeze political grievance out of it.

That is Obi’s problem: he is his own Chief Demarketing Officer — CDO.

No APC media team needs to work overtime. Just give Obi a microphone, a trending issue, and ten minutes. He will find a way to convert sympathy into suspicion, tragedy into talking point, and minor inconvenience into persecution.

A serious leader would know when to speak, when to pause, and when to simply say: “Thank God the children are alive.”

But Pity-Party Peter always looks for the nearest microphone before looking for the nearest wisdom.

givedemwotowoto:
I don’t think most Tinubu supporters understand democracy or believe in it, so you can’t really argue objectively with them.

Opposition is a core symbol of democracy. A major Presidential candidate symbolizes a working democracy

If you have incidents where members of your political party are given free passes or even rewarded while a major Presidential candidate is penalized, then you’re not only guilty of corruption, you’re also guilty of persecuting opposition. This asides, the inconsistencies in Keyamo’s statement.

In the US whose model of democracy we follow, opposition candidates get the same priority level protection as the US President.

But we can’t have this discussion if you don’t even understand democracy

It is Obidients who keep confusing democracy with diplomatic immunity for Peter Obi.

Opposition is part of democracy, yes. But opposition does not mean a presidential candidate becomes above airport rules, traffic rules, court processes, fines, or ordinary civic obligations.

In a real democracy, being a major opposition figure does not turn a parking violation into persecution. In the U.S. or UK, if a former presidential candidate’s driver parks wrongly at an airport drop-off zone, the car can be ticketed or towed. Nobody will call CNN to announce dictatorship.

That is the problem with your argument. You are not defending democracy. You are defending political entitlement.

If Oshiomhole broke airport rules, punish Oshiomhole. If APC people break rules, punish them too. But another person escaping sanction does not magically make Obi innocent. It only means enforcement should be extended, not that Obi should be exempted.

This is the Obidient disease: every rule that touches Obi becomes persecution; every fine becomes oppression; every criticism becomes demarketing; every question becomes paid propaganda.

You people don’t want democracy.

You want Saint Obi Exemption Clause — a special constitution where Peter Obi can do no wrong and every inconvenience becomes tyranny.

So please, don’t lecture anyone on democracy while arguing that opposition status should cancel ordinary airport regulation.

johannu:
Touts don't place 'no parking' signs so they will get many customers.

That's why Peter Obi told them, "It is me; you can't extort money from me."

The excuses you people manufacture for[b] Pity-Party Peter [/b] are becoming comedy with boarding pass.

Everybody who has used an airport knows the difference between a drop-off zone and a parking lot. You don’t need a “No Parking” sign written on the moon before you know that a drop-off area is for dropping passengers and moving on.

Saying “touts did not put sign” is like a man sleeping on a zebra crossing and blaming government for not writing “do not build house here.”

The real touting is not the airport enforcement.

The real touting is turning a simple parking violation into persecution drama.

If the car was left there wrongly, pay the fine and move on. But because it is Pity-Party Peter, even a parking ticket must wear agbada and become national oppression.

At this rate, if LASTMA stops him tomorrow, Obidients will say Tinubu has weaponised traffic light.

givedemwotowoto:
Sarauta Maryam Accuses Festus Keyamo Of Double Standards Over Peter Obi

Previous Story



Source

My friend , this letter you a parading is built on very lazy logic.

First, the Peter Obi issue was not about merely parking near other vehicles. According to Keyamo, CCTV showed Obi’s vehicle was left unattended for about 30 minutes in a designated drop-off zone, and airport workers only clamped it in line with the rules.

Keyamo’s argument is that Obi then framed an ordinary airport enforcement matter as political persecution. That is the issue.
Second, dragging Oshiomhole into it does not automatically rescue Obi. If Oshiomhole breached airport rules, sanction him too. Nobody is saying Oshiomhole is above the law. But “what of Oshiomhole?” is not a defence to “did Obi’s car violate airport rules?”

That is like a student caught cheating saying, “Sir, but another student made noise last week.” Fine, punish the noisy student too. But first answer your own case.

Third, this letter carefully avoids the key question: did Obi’s driver leave the vehicle unattended in a restricted/drop-off area for about 30 minutes? If yes, pay the ₦25,000 fine and move on. It is not a United Nations human rights case.

The real problem is that Pity-Party Peter turned airport parking into political martyrdom. Instead of quietly resolving a simple traffic/airport compliance issue, his camp, as usual, tried to package it as persecution.

Now that CCTV has entered the matter, they have switched to selective enforcement.

My answer is simple: enforce the law on everybody — Obi, Oshiomhole, ministers, senators, governors, everybody.

But don’t convert Obi’s parking ticket into Nelson Mandela’s trial.

Treasure17:
Peter Obi is being targeted whether you like it or not. Comparing Oshiomole scenarios to Peter's Obi is ridiculous. He should keep mute until your godfather take him out àbi? Rederede.

Nobody asked Peter Obi to keep mute. We are asking him to stop converting every inconvenience into martyrdom.

If he is truly being targeted, let him document it, report it formally, name the actors, show the threat, and pursue legal/security channels. That is what serious leaders do.

But Pity-Party Peter cannot say “they want to take me out” and then present airport parking, import business stress and political hostility as evidence. That is like a man hearing generator noise at night and announcing that artillery fire has started.

Sympathy is not strategy.

If there is a real threat, let him prove it.

If not, he should stop feeding his supporters persecution syrup in an election season ignominous defeat is staring him in the face.

A man who wants to lead Nigeria should not campaign like a frightened passenger looking for who moved his luggage at the airport.

Christistruth03:
All this Yanga and noise just because the Oyo Students and Teachers were rescued.

Una no dey shame?!

Pity-Party Peter And The Airport Parking Presidency. by CharlesCNG.

Peter Obi has now taken victimhood politics to another level. He recently said he “may not be alive” to contest in 2027, alleging that the government is frustrating his activities and targeting opposition figures. Reports say he complained about government pressure, business frustration, and the general hostility he claims to be facing.

But when you listen to the examples, the drama begins to look like a man trying to convert ordinary inconvenience into national persecution.

Airport parking problem becomes political assassination.
Import business pressure becomes state conspiracy.
Regulatory frustration becomes “they want to stop me.”
Every traffic cone on his road suddenly becomes an APC sniper.

My brother, this is not presidential politics. This is Pity-Party Peter campaigning with a handkerchief and a boarding pass.

Millions of Nigerians face business challenges, import difficulties, airport stress, customs delays, forex problems and regulatory headaches every day. They don’t all announce that they may not live till 2027. They struggle, adapt, complain, and keep moving.

A man asking to lead over 200 million people should not sound like every inconvenience is a personal death sentence.

Leadership requires steel. It requires emotional discipline. It requires the ability to separate real threats from political theatre.

If Obi truly has evidence of threats to his life, he should formally report, document and pursue it.

But if airport parking and import frustration are now campaign materials, then Pity-Party Peter has turned grievance into a full manifesto.

SlavaUkraini:
https://dailypost.ng/2026/07/11/oyo-children-teachers-freed-on-apcs-first-re-election-campaign-day-atiku-criticises-tinubu/

When Politics Becomes Too Hungry: Atiku's Oyo Statement Misses the Moment.

There is a time to campaign.

There is a time to criticise.

And there is a time to simply thank God that innocent children are alive.

The rescue of the abducted Oyo pupils and teachers should have been one of those moments.

Instead, Atiku Abubakar immediately framed it through the prism of politics, suggesting that the timing of the rescue alongside the APC's campaign activities was somehow suspicious.

Governments do not usually control the exact day intelligence-led rescue operations succeed. Such operations often depend on surveillance, actionable intelligence and operational readiness, not political calendars.

Ironically, Atiku urged that "politics can wait," yet his own statement turned a rescue into a political talking point.

That is precisely what he said should not happen.

Opposition is essential in a democracy.

But so is restraint.

Not every national success should be viewed first as a political loss for the government.

Sometimes, rescued children should simply be rescued children.

SeeWahala:
You retired your WizardofNG monika and took this one because you realised nobody was reading your long-long propaganda epistles anymore but we have clocked you with this one 🤭

Obidients and SANE Nigerians will drive you APC gang of goons to create more than 20 new accounts before January next year ajé 😏

First of all, I have never had any moniker called WizardofNG. So you are already debating with ghosts from inside your own head.

This is what happens when you people cannot answer a simple argument: you abandon the issue and start chasing imaginary usernames.

The write-up was about one thing: why are some people manufacturing conspiracy instead of rejoicing that abducted children have been rescued?

You did not answer that.

Instead, you started talking about WizardofNG, new accounts, APC goons and “sane Nigerians.”

And please stop pretending Obidients are the only Nigerians with a voice online. Nigeria is bigger than your echo chamber. There are APC supporters, PDP supporters, NNPP supporters, undecided voters, conservatives, liberals, neutrals, and ordinary citizens who are tired of tragedy politics.

You people call yourselves “sane Nigerians,” yet when children are rescued, some of you are busy looking for conspiracy, timing, hidden motive and political profit.

That is the point you are running away from.

Leave moniker hunting and answer the issue.

Why is it so hard for your camp to simply say: thank God the children are alive?

Irony1:
You people are the reason why our leaders would never be responsible. Yes it is great the people are rescued but we deserve to know the specifics and we deserve to see the captured bandits.
Anything other than that raises suspicion and enforces the belief that back channel ransom payment was made.
Leave propaganda and let us face facts, love of APC govt and love for the country are two different things if you love the country you should speak the truth to power and demand explanations from the leaders elected to serve you. Anyone asking these questions or trying to probe for information doesn't make him a hateful person.

You have just shifted the goalposts.

Nobody said government should not be questioned. In fact, accountability is a cornerstone of democracy.

What I challenged was something different: people who, before any evidence was available, rushed to insinuate that terrorists were secretly exchanged or that ransom must have been paid.

Those are serious allegations.

They require serious evidence.

So far, the Presidency says there was no quid pro quo, security agencies say arrests were made, and the alleged terrorist commander whose release was demanded remains in custody and is being prosecuted.

If you have evidence to the contrary, present it.

If not, suspicion is not proof.

There is also a difference between asking, "How was the rescue carried out?" and confidently declaring, "Government must have negotiated with terrorists."

One is accountability.

The other is speculation.

The children have been rescued after 56 days.

The decent first response is relief.

Then comes scrutiny.

Not the other way round.

As our elders say, "A man who begins with the verdict before hearing the evidence is not seeking justice; he is seeking confirmation."

ngmgeek:
Only 10 reasons. Why not 100 reasons? 🤔

Una go reasons tire. Bulaba!

Ask him to open his mouth a 100 times and I will oblige you 100 reasons why I will not vote pity-party peter in 2027.
He is his own chief demarketing officer.CMO.

Streetinvestor2:
Why I be responding to your post is simply. I want next tie u want to open a topic on obi.You hand will be shaking
Answer this two questions and not speaking English
If the drug baron sees people like you and his followers as people with brains.Tell me one interview he has granted to give you people opportunities to ask questions. Answer the questions and not trying to beat around the bush
The second question is it the drug baron that is the president that makes decisions of apc party.So why should we be concerned which vehicle obi joins in trying to be president. When the only thing that matters is the person who becomes the president

Thank you for proving my point.

You accused me of "speaking English," yet neither of your questions addresses the argument I made.

My argument was simple:

Is it healthy in a democracy to follow a politician without questioning him?

You have not answered that.

Instead, you asked me about Tinubu granting interviews.

Whether Tinubu grants one interview or one hundred interviews has absolutely no bearing on whether it is wise to suspend critical thinking in support of Peter Obi.

Those are two different issues.



So let me return to the original question—the one you carefully avoided:

Should supporters question their preferred candidate when necessary, or should they simply assume he is always right?

Everything else you have written is a detour around that question.

And when someone repeatedly avoids the central question, it is usually because the honest answer is uncomfortable.

ogolemati:
receive it

How To Spot An Obidient On Nairaland: A User Guide.

Not everyone who criticises Tinubu is an Obidient. and not everyone who supports opposition politics is an Obidient.

But there is a pattern.

If it quacks like an Obidient, insults like an Obidient, dodges facts like an Obidient, and shouts “data boy” like an Obidient, forgive me for recognising the duck.

You can usually spot them by the familiar feathers.

First, they rarely answer the issue. If you raise facts, they attack your motive. If you ask for evidence, they say you are paid. If you question Peter Obi, they say you are working for APC. If you defend a point they dislike, they call you “data boy.”

Second, they confuse abuse with intelligence. Instead of argument, you get insults. Instead of data, you get slogans. Instead of reasoning, you get “fake certificate,” “snatch and grab,” “criminal,” and other recycled chants........

silibaba:
But they will still call them repented terrorist and later release them into the military. So any difference?

This is exactly the desperation I am talking about.

Children and teachers have just been rescued after 56 days in captivity, and instead of expressing relief, obidients are already flapping around like rain-beaten chickens, looking for how to drag “repentant terrorists” into the matter.

Why is it so hard for these sadistic and hateful obidients to say: thank God the pupils are alive?

On the “repentant terrorists joining the military” claim, that story has been repeatedly denied and fact-checked.

The Presidency said in 2020 that not one graduate of Operation Safe Corridor had been absorbed into the military. AFP also fact-checked a viral video claiming repentant Boko Haram fighters were recruited into the army and found it false; the video actually showed Civilian Joint Task Force members joining the army, not rehabilitated terrorists.

Operation Safe Corridor itself was established in 2016 under the previous administration to receive voluntary defectors from Boko Haram factions. It has always been controversial because many Nigerians fear reintegration without adequate justice for victims. That concern is legitimate. But there is a difference between legitimate concern and weaponised obidient deflection.

In this Oyo rescue, the Presidency said eight kidnappers were arrested, others were neutralised, and there was **no quid pro quo**. Channels reported that one terrorist kingpin whose release was demanded by the kidnappers is being prosecuted. In other words, government did not swap schoolchildren for terrorist commanders.

So what exactly are obidients angry about?

The operation was intelligence-led, involving security agencies over weeks, until the captors were tracked, cornered, some arrested, some neutralised, and the victims brought out alive. Reuters and AP both reported the rescue of the abducted Oyo pupils and teachers by Nigerian security forces.

The sad truth is that some opposition voices especially Peter Obi, had already turned the children’s captivity into campaign fuel.

Now that the children are alive, their propaganda engine has lost petrol.

That is why they are deflecting.

Normal people celebrate rescued children.

Only disaster merchants start looking for a new grievance before the parents finish thanking God.

This is what happens when politics poisons the mind.

Children were abducted for 56 days. Families cried. A teacher was reportedly killed. Security agencies worked quietly, followed intelligence, refused ransom and prisoner-swap blackmail, and eventually brought the children home.

A normal person hears that news and feels relief.

But some people hear it and immediately start manufacturing conspiracy.

So because the children were rescued around the same period political discussions were happening, the next thing is to suggest that the kidnapping may have been connected to APC ticket politics?

This is not analysis. This is sickness wearing “just asking questions” perfume.

The most disturbing part is that one can sense the disappointment behind the conspiracy.
The obidients and peter obi had already converted the children’s pain into campaign fuel. Now that the victims are back alive, they need another angle to keep the tragedy politically useful.

That is why everything becomes politics to them.

If the children remain in captivity, blame Tinubu.
If the children are rescued, invent conspiracy.
If security agencies succeed, question the timing.
If government acts, suspect motive.

At what point will these people simply be happy that children are alive? Are these people normal at all ?

This is the danger of sadistic opposition politics: human suffering becomes content, rescue becomes inconvenience, and national relief becomes propaganda material.

Normal people should not turn disaster into campaign fuel.

And human pain should never become propaganda.

Dogalmighty17:
This may just be a coincidence. But isn't it strange that the day it was officially verified who the co-flagbearer of the APC presidential ticket in 2027 will be, the kidnapped school kids in Oyo were released?

Just a thought. Were the people behind the kidnapping trying to force the presidents hand? Was politics behind all this? The suffering of those kids? The killing of their teachers? Was the insinuation that the president may drop his vice a trigger for the kidnapping?

I'm pretty sure this is all a coincidence though. Special thanks to the president and indeed all the security agencies who worked for the release of those children. I pray such an incident never happens again.

When Rescue Becomes Conspiracy by CharlesCNG.

This is what happens when politics poisons the mind.

Children were abducted for 56 days. Families cried. A teacher was reportedly killed. Security agencies worked quietly, followed intelligence, refused ransom and prisoner-swap blackmail, and eventually brought the children home.

A normal person hears that news and feels relief.

But obidients hear it and immediately start manufacturing conspiracy.

So because the children were rescued around the same period political discussions were happening, the next thing is to suggest that the kidnapping may have been connected to APC ticket politics?

This is not analysis. This is sickness wearing “just asking questions” perfume.

The most disturbing part is that one can sense the disappointment behind the conspiracy.

They had already converted the children’s pain into campaign fuel. Now that the victims are back alive, they need another angle to keep the tragedy politically useful.

That is why everything becomes politics to them.

If the children remain in captivity, blame Tinubu.
If the children are rescued, invent conspiracy.
If security agencies succeed, question the timing.
If government acts, suspect motive.

At what point will they simply be happy that children are alive?

This is the danger of sadistic opposition politics: human suffering becomes content, rescue becomes inconvenience, and national relief becomes propaganda material.

Normal people should not turn disaster into campaign fuel.

And human pain should never become propaganda.

johannu:
Hell awaits those playing religio-political games with human lives.

That is because you do not know how sick, sadistic, satanic this people are.

Children were abducted. Families suffered. Security operatives risked their lives. The first response should be relief, gratitude and sober reflection — not political gymnastics.

Because when your politics becomes too addicted to tragedy, even fake stories begin to sound familiar.

Only morally bankrupt politics turns disaster into campaign fuel and converts human pain into propaganda.

silibaba:
Who ask you?.

The terrorists wanted to exchange schoolchildren for their commanders.

The government refused.

It refused to turn innocent pupils into bargaining currency.

One thing about President Tinubu is that he appears willing to make difficult decisions that many leaders would avoid.

Negotiating from a position of weakness may secure a temporary reprieve, but it can also encourage future kidnappings by signalling that abducting innocent citizens is an effective bargaining tool.

President Tinubu's audacity in matters is something that needs to be studied. The man is fearless when it comes to tough decisions.

OgbeniOja1:
A rescue without an apprehended kidnapper. I'm disgusted.

This is classic Disaster-Merchandising Obidience: if victims remain captive, campaign with their pain; if they are rescued, complain about the receipt.
Sick people.Very sick people indeed.

Jostoman:
Finally APC don see story to cover Peter obi complain about a threat to his life and businesses and the continue detention of Elrufai story.

See how far political bitterness has damaged you obidients.

Children were abducted. Families cried for weeks. Security operatives worked. Victims have now reportedly regained freedom. And your first instinct is not relief, not gratitude, not sympathy — but “APC don see story to cover Obi.”

That is not politics. That is moral dislocation.

So the release of kidnapped pupils is now a media distraction from Peter Obi’s complaint? Human lives are now side stories to Obi’s political drama?

This is exactly the disaster-merchandising mindset we keep talking about. If the tragedy continues, obidients campaign with it. If the victims are rescued, they say APC is using it to cover another story.

So when exactly should Nigeria be happy?

Normal people celebrate rescued children first. Political accountants can calculate propaganda later.

Obi is not the centre of every national event. Sometimes, the story is simply that children went through hell and came back alive.

Ttalk:
You rush to good news like this and started crying and cursing and you say am the one in pain?

Which kind people person share country with sef?

Sadistic and satanic people.
Normal people should not turn disaster into campaign fuel, and human pain should never become propaganda.
But this people are not normal.
One suspects some of them will not even be happy today. They may already be waiting for the next tragedy to hang around Tinubu’s neck.

Opposition And Disaster Merchandising. When Pain Becomes Propaganda.

The reported rescue of abducted Oyo pupils and teachers should bring relief to every decent Nigerian. According to AP, the Federal Government announced that students abducted in May in Oyo State had been rescued, with security forces also arresting eight suspected militants during the operation. The abduction had lasted over 50 days and involved dozens of pupils and teachers.

But while families were crying, praying and waiting, some opposition voices and that shameless, opportunistic peter obi and his lunatic despicable, disgusting obidients mob were already converting the tragedy into campaign material. Peter Obi had earlier used the abduction to attack President Tinubu, saying Governor Seyi Makinde told him Tinubu had not called him more than 50 days after the incident, and he used that claim to renew calls for Tinubu not to seek re-election.

This is the tragedy of opportunistic politics.

A child is abducted, and instead of asking how to support rescue efforts, some people begin calculating political advantage. They were not interested in coordination, intelligence, local security failure, forest routes, ransom networks, or the role of the state government.

They only wanted one headline: “Tinubu failed.”

Now that the victims have been rescued, will the same people celebrate with the same energy?

The opposition, obidients and that shameless, brainless peter obi should be ashamed. Human disaster is not campaign fuel. Children’s tears are not manifesto ink.

One suspects some of them will not even be happy today. They may already be waiting for the next tragedy to hang around Tinubu’s neck.

That is not patriotism.

That is disaster merchandising.

Nigeria needs serious opposition, not people like who treat national pain like campaign content.

Only morally bankrupt politics turns disaster into campaign fuel and converts human pain into propaganda.

Streetinvestor2:
If it is not killing the drug baron as he is holding his neck. Why are you crying more than Obidients as you claim when they have sense more than you do too
Your cry is so loud that you are begging and opening topic on the matter. When a baby is crying and pointing finger at a direction. It is common knowledge that something is in that direction the baby is pointing. How on earth can drug baron gang be the one wanting to advise obi on what should be done.Is it not show a joke and obi is definitely doing the right thing mostly if what he is saying is open facts
Have they increased your stipend for the job..lol

This is exactly the broken loudspeaker I was talking about.

Noise everywhere, answer nowhere.

If Obi is “doing the right thing” and the facts are “open,” then open them.

A baby crying and pointing may mean danger. It may also mean hunger, fear, or pure tantrum. That is why adults investigate before turning baby noise into political prophecy.

Obi is not holding anybody’s neck.

He is holding microphone and leaking credibility.

Streetinvestor2:
We follow without asking questions because we know it is right as we have brain
Then the ones following the drug baron is completely opposite of us as they are zombies with no brain of thr own to even reason
Do you now see a clear difference

Thank you for confirming the diagnosis.

“We follow without asking questions because we know it is right” is not political consciousness. That is exactly Zombie Followership Syndrome wearing reading glasses.

A thinking citizen says: “I support him, but I will question him.”
A political zombie says: “We don’t ask questions because we already know he is right.”

That is not brain. That is remote control.

And the funniest part is that the man you are following is not even a compass; he is a political weather vane. Today LP, tomorrow ADC, next tomorrow NDC, then “they don’t want me on the ballot.” Every wind blows, Saint Obi adjusts direction, and the choir calls it strategy.

So please don’t boast about having brain while defending unquestioning loyalty.

A brain that refuses to question its own candidate is not a brain.

It is a campaign loudspeaker with skull covering.

esnbrutality:
Still churning out arrant nonsense

And yet you are still reading and responding to the same “arrant nonsense.”

My friend, that means the nonsense has become compulsory reading in your political household.

If it is nonsense, skip it. If it is wrong, rebut it.
But this habit of reading, getting angry, replying, and then pretending you are above the discussion is premium confusion.

If nonsense keeps dragging you back to reply, maybe it is not nonsense; maybe it is truth wearing a wrapper you dislike.

Something strange happened in Iran last night.

Iranian media reported fresh explosions in parts of the country, especially around Bushehr, the southern port province that also hosts Iran’s only civilian nuclear power plant. Semi-official Iranian outlets like Fars and Mehr reported explosions in Bushehr city and also around Choqadak in Bushehr Province, but details were thin, as usual.

Then came the interesting part: the United States quickly denied involvement. Al Jazeera also reported that explosions were heard in Iran while the US military denied carrying out new strikes.

So here is the million-dollar question:

If America did not do it, who did?

Was it Israel?
Was it internal sabotage?
Was it a drone attack?
Was it an accident?
Was it Iran’s own air defence firing at shadows?

Iranian authorities have not clearly blamed any country, and the reports so far have not provided enough evidence to identify the source of the blasts. NDTV also reported that several areas in Bushehr province were said to have been targeted, but Tehran had not blamed any country while the US denied involvement.

But geopolitically, the timing is too sensitive to ignore. Tensions around Iran, the US, Israel and the Gulf have been dangerously high, and Israeli officials have also been quoted as saying the war is “not over.”

So for now, the official answer is: nobody knows.

But in the Middle East, when explosions happen near strategic locations and everyone denies involvement, the silence sometimes speaks louder than the blast.

Iran heard the explosion.

America denied the knock.

Israel is watching.

And the world is asking: who pressed the button?

For me, one thing is clear: Iran must never be allowed to control the Strait of Hormuz.

The Strait of Hormuz is not an ordinary waterway. It is one of the most sensitive economic arteries on earth. Oil, gas, tankers, shipping routes, energy prices, global markets and national economies all breathe through that narrow passage.

Handing Iran effective control of Hormuz would be like giving a pyromaniac the only key to a global fuel depot, then asking the world to sleep peacefully because he has promised not to strike a match.

jogojogo:
You assertion is flawlessly articulated but unfortunately his followers would disagree with you because they believe everything Peter Obi does is right even if was not a stand they aligned with earlier, once Peter stands with that, they automatically switch to align

Exactly. They remind one of Fela’s warning about people who follow blindly without opening their eyes.

At this point, it is no longer politics; it is Zombie Followership Syndrome — movement without independent thought, loyalty without brakes, and obedience without reflection.

Fela sang about people who follow-follow without asking questions and opening eyes.

Obidients have turned it into a political operating system.

Elusive001:
BS

Bunkum

Another Obidient post where insult is doing the work of argument.

“BS.” “Bunkum.”

That is all? My Friend, even your rebuttal came on low battery.

This is why it is easy to spot the[b] Vibes-and-Victimhood Brigade[/b] of the Excuse-Maker-in-Chief.

Once facts appear, they throw two lazy words into the air and call it intelligence.

If it is BS, break it down.
If it is bunkum, debunk it.

But if all you can do is bark abbreviations, then the bunkum is not in my post.

It is in your empty response.

esnbrutality:
Always churning out nonsense

Yet you and your pathetic Obidient mob are always first in line to respond to the “nonsense.”

If it is truly nonsense, scroll past it. Don’t read it, don’t quote it, don’t reply to it, don’t donate your blood pressure to it.

But the truth is simple: the “nonsense” is touching the right nerve, and your crowd cannot resist scratching.

So keep calling it nonsense.

I will keep writing it.

And there is absolutely nothing your noise committee can do about it.

Streetinvestor2:
NNO he can't stop.He is holding the drug baron neck with 2 hands and pressing it for the past 3 yrs he grabbed power and ran away. So he must keep squeezing the neck to drain life from him gradually. It is good and wonderful strategy

When I said somebody close to Peter Obi should speak to him, I was not asking a typical Obidient to do it.

That would be like asking a broken loudspeaker to correct a bad song. It will only increase the noise.

The problem is that you people mistake Obi’s careless,senseless talk for opposition strategy.
You think every dramatic statement, every vague allegation, every emotional outburst and every “they don’t want me on the ballot” lamentation is political genius.

No, my brother.

That is not “holding anybody’s neck.” That is a man holding microphone and exposing the poverty of his own intellectual political depth.

Serious opposition is not permanent whining. Serious opposition is policy clarity, coalition discipline, institutional engagement, legal preparedness, grassroots structure and alternative vision. But what we keep getting from Obi is flippancy wrapped in victimhood.

What is happening now is pathetic.

The candidate now sounds like his mob, and the mob sounds like its candidate: loud, bitter, suspicious, allergic to evidence, and permanently rehearsing excuses.

Obi is not squeezing anybody’s neck.

He is squeezing what remains of his credibility — and at this rate, there may be nothing left to squeeze.

mrvitalis:
From Obi won’t win his ward in 2023 to he won’t win north

Truth no objective person can deny

1) Obi has penetrated north more
2) obi has far more politicians to at least protect his votes more in 2027 it won’t be as easy reduce his votes


Remember Obi won all polling unit in military barracks where rigging couldn’t have been done

**Was Obi Rigged In Every Northern State Where He Could Not Score 10%?**

This is the problem with Obidient analysis: once Obi wins, it is proof of popularity; once Obi loses, it is proof of rigging.

That is not analysis. That is political superstition.

They say Obi has “penetrated the North more.” Fine. But let us interrogate 2023 with figures.

In Kano, Obi scored only 28,513 votes, while Kwankwaso scored 997,279, Tinubu scored 517,341, and Atiku scored 131,716. Are we saying Obi was rigged from almost one million votes down to 28,000 in Kano? At what point does propaganda become comedy?

In Jigawa, Tinubu scored 421,390, Atiku scored 386,587, Kwankwaso scored 98,234, while Obi was almost electorally invisible. Are we also saying they rigged Obi out of Jigawa so badly that he could not even enter the serious conversation?

In Kwara, Tinubu scored 263,572, Atiku scored 136,909, while Obi scored 31,166. That is not a rigging story; that is a weak-structure story.

In Katsina, Sokoto, Zamfara, Yobe, Borno, Kebbi and several other core northern states, Obi’s 2023 performance showed the same pattern: he was not a mass northern candidate. He had pockets of strength, especially in Christian/Middle Belt and urban protest zones, but he did not penetrate the Muslim North in any serious electoral sense.

That is why this “Obi won the North but was rigged out” argument is senseless.

Did he go to court to prove that he won Kano?

Did he prove that he won Jigawa?

Did he prove that he won Katsina?

Did he prove that he won Sokoto?

Did he prove that he won Zamfara?

Did he prove that millions of northern votes were stolen from him?

No.

He went to the tribunal, then to the Supreme Court, and the courts dismissed his challenge. The Supreme Court affirmed Tinubu’s election and held that the opposition challenges lacked merit.

So what exactly are we discussing?

Obi came third in the declared national result. Tinubu came first. Atiku came second. Obi came third. Even Reuters, reporting on the 2027 opposition situation, described Obi as the candidate who came third in 2023.

But Obidients want a political mathematics where third place means secret winner.

When Obi wins Lagos, the election is credible.

When Obi wins FCT, the election is credible.

When Obi wins Plateau, the election is credible.

When Obi wins Nasarawa, the election is credible.

When Obi wins military barracks polling units, the election is credible.

But when he loses Kano, Katsina, Jigawa, Sokoto, Zamfara, Yobe, Borno and other core northern states, suddenly the election was rigged.

That is not logic. That is selective madness.

And this military barracks argument is another funny one. Winning some polling units inside barracks does not mean you won Nigeria. A barracks polling unit is not the federation. It is not Kano. It is not Katsina. It is not Sokoto. It is not Borno. It is not Jigawa.

You cannot use a few barracks polling units as microscope and then pretend you have diagnosed the whole country.

The truth is simple: Obi’s 2023 northern performance was uneven. He did well in certain Christian, urban and protest-vote zones. He failed badly in many core northern states. That is the record.

So before anyone shouts “Obi has penetrated the North,” ask them: which North?

The Plateau North?

The Kaduna Christian belt?

The FCT urban protest vote?

Or the Kano-Katsina-Jigawa-Sokoto-Zamfara-Yobe-Borno North where he could not build enough structure to compete?

Politics is not vibes.

If Obi has truly penetrated the North, let them show us the governors, senators, House of Reps members, state assembly members, local government chairmen, ward structures and polling-unit agents that prove this penetration.

Because in Nigerian elections, penetration is not measured by Twitter confidence.

It is measured by votes, spread and structure.