₦airaland Forum

Top 10 Countries where women are in (short supply/high demand

Based on popular assumption, women are more than men on the planet earth, but to our and may be your surprise too, the geographic distribution is not even if the above statement is to be accepted as true.

Some demographical facts from some countries have proven that women are in short supply, and this can be attributed to factor like gender imbalance, for instance, infant mortality is higher in boys than girls in across the globe.

Based on the male to female sex ratio estimation done by the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency, the world average for the ratio of males/females is 1.01, which translates to the fact that there are 1.01 males for every female (more males than females)...

Countries with short supply of women includes:

10. Switzerland is short of female
9. India is short of female
8. Sweden (no wonder there are more female Aupair welcome to the country annually)
7. Italy is short of female
6. Finland is short of female
5. China is short of female with 34 million more men than women with a ratio of 88.03.
4. Cyprus is short of female
3. Canada is short of female
2. Iceland is short of female
1. Norway is short of female

Karlifate:
Look no further, the prophecy is being fulfilled.

LMAO!

Countries with short supply of women includes:
10. Switzerland is short of female
9. India is short of female
8. Sweden (no wonder there are more female Aupair welcome to the country annually)
7. Italy is short of female
6. Finland is short of female
5. China is short of female with 34 million more men than women with a ratio of 88.03.
4. Cyprus is short of female
3. Canada is short of female
2. Iceland is short of female
1. Norway is short of female

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlkkXkxQdgg

osamz007:
ALLAHU AKBAR NO RULING OR HADITH ON THIS


EVEN ON FRIDAY THEY MUST COMMIT WICKEDNESS AS COMMANDED FROM ABOVE

Cant you see the killer has mental problem?leave God out your nonsense.I wonder where was the mother.

They took our 7 Days old baby for Religious reasons is the story of a couple who had their 7 days old baby taken away due to their own failings. The premise of this stream is to help us within the black community to wake up and do better in terms of handling our kids / family abroad. Please help share They took our 7 Days old baby for Religious reasons live streams so others can learn.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUHzS9xbDU4

OfficialAwol:
Great explication you have provided.

For one, I know that both the US and the EU do not want another humanitarian crisis like has been experienced in the Middle East. And that's why they are willing to tolerate all of Buhari's fumble if that will maintain stability.

If you ask me, I will tell you that Buhari may have died, but the world is quiet to prevent crisis and war.

In the end, war won't serve us any good.

The US and EU make all the policies buhari is rolling out To Nigeria.Nigeria is a slave camo for the colonialist.Independence is the handover of power of white colonialists to house nigger.Buhari is on autopilot,he doesnt have real control.

Rugaria:
Lol
Is there anything that America will do to Nigeria that will be worse than what Buhari and his cohorts are doing to this unfortunate country as we speak? Maybe they have an agenda here. So what are we supposed to do? Since 1960, Nigerian leaders have had all the opportunities they need to biuld a strong country, but refused. So if the Americans want to enjoy themselves here, I don't really care.. We are already down, so why fear any further fall..?

If Americans come into Nigeria,they will bomb and use new war technologies to kill,maim and destroy as many people as possible only to labelled them collateral damage.Go and ask Iraqis and Afghans in their new democracy.

WakeNbaked:
You don't know anything but you still collect chop, shey if na debt dey tell sai one aunty for the next compound sai make them meet them shey dey go even ask which aunty before descending on the person.

He and the uncle could have eaten poisoned food as unmerited favour. Why didnt the uncle do a farm work to earn a living?

The uncle didnt teach Adeboye good manners,It was better for them to beg for food in their village or work for food.
Thank you Adeboye for alerting us that your members cannot be trusted in a business setting because they will bankrupt the company and call it unmerited favour.

SweetHearted:
He said he saw ghosts selling and people buying.

The man who said this is spiritually very strong.

He is also a healing pastor. God has used him to deliver so many people.

Then he was both a pastor and a banker with afribank.

Now he has left banking.

He said if you are not strong spiritually,you cannot observe the ghost markets because they will kill you.

But he observed it and they couldn't harm him.

To tell you how strong this man is; a police man once forced him to give him (the policeman) bribe. He prayed over the money and handed the money to the policeman.

Immediately the policeman got the money,he fell down,rose up,fell down again ,rose up,fell down,up to 5 times, until he apologized, gave the pastor back his money and ran away.

So this man knows what he is talking about concerning ghosts markets.

Also in those days when he worked with Afribank,there were no phones as we have these days where you can snap photos with.

And you cannot even snap anything in the night.

The man is into spiritual warfare and solution to spiritual problems affecting people.

So I believe the man knows what he is talking about.

The man belong to the occult in the spiritual realm.Dont be deceived.

mu2sa2:
Fake pastor! Fake church! Fake religion!

All religions are cultism no different from aiye,bucaneers.The only difference is a verse or chapter of their books to trigger the switch.

Dat2jo:
Let me introduce Binomo onion investment to you. Invest 10k and get half of this warehouse within 24hrs to your destination.

Scammer alert

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2ShTc3Id3I

TooMuchStuff:
Hope it's not Tinubu or Mamman Daura

It is Mamman Daura,Tinubu is hale and hearty.

Very disturbing to see Mr Martins an Embassy staff in Berlin, accused of sleeping with married women before renewing their Nigerian passport or issuing them visa.
This is a normal thing in Nigeria even in private companies where the Boss sleeps with ladies to gain or retain their job but very unfortunate.

https://www.facebook.com/416732518754851/posts/1035282823566481/?vh=e&d=n

XANDERO85:
Forbes billionaire that doesn't have any single investment of note in his state....that one no be audio billionaire?

So that the youths will burn it down,nba.

sapphiere:
Men are greedy in nature. They want all to themselves.

I think the news is fake.She is likely Ned´s sister in law engaged to be married to someone else.

bukatyne:
Analyst cocolacec

Perhaps she meant the intimacy?

I know what i am saying from experience.

Ingredients
Milk - 1/2gallon
Sugar - 1/2cup


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymm1RUxwyVc&t=4s

9jayes:



After politics the next lucrative business is BBNAIJA

After politican the next lucrative business is Religion,they make a killing.You can open bank on peoples head.BBnaija is chicken change.

MrCover:
Update From . COM

Big Brother Naija couple, Teddy A and Bam Bam are celebrating the 1st wedding anniversary today, November 16, Reports.

From The Information Gathered By , The couple, who have since welcomed a daughter named Zendaya, took to their respective Instagram accounts to celebrate their union.

Sharing photos from their white wedding, Bam Bam wrote:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CHoVNuphGHG/?igshid=1ug0cq5arpqdd

https://www.instagram.com/p/CHoRC4pHXP2/?igshid=1r822n0wir99x

Feels like 10years in 1 year marriage doesnt sound good.If you are in a love marriage,even after 10 years of marriage you will feel like you have been in the relationship for lesser years only the children or dates will remind you of how old your marriage is.

Bushiri on the run


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBiT-j4KUOw Published on 15 Nov 2020
Confusion, anger, and mystery still surround the departure of Prophet Bushiri to Malawi. SA authorities can't explain how the self-proclaimed prophet escaped the country. eNCA's Tshego Moagi, who has been tracking this story.

What now for self-proclaimed prophet, Shepherd Bushiri and his wife, Mary?
Home Affairs gave them 30 days to explain how they came to live in South Africa.The department's issued a notice to the couple, asking them to clarify discrepancies in their applications for permanent residency.
But a high court has suspended this until after the Bushiris plead in their criminal trial in May next year. eNCA’s Tshegohaco Moagi has more. Courtesy


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfn12-yq9jE

chubinwa:
Devil incarnate. I feel she has a high sexual libido that one or two men can't satisfy.

Why call her devil incarnate,male pastors do this all the time.

TheCork:

..
Ok .. obviously am a Londoner who live in a rich area of London call Pekam next door to Buckingham palace & drive £35,000 (cash) BMW..

..anyways .why do all women prefa only we London guys simply becoz we better lookin, spek good English innit, have moiney & spend pound stalin & co
why why why?

Please advice

Mr Ajegunle of London(Peckham) stop lying

akstrending:
A Nigerian Youtuber Uduak Inwang and his lovely wife Itoro share a video of them pilling up dry leaves in their house and jumping on it.
The couple who shared the video on their fast-growing YouTube channel Diary of Cavil had real fun and had this to say.

[url]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAhg4p_81RA/url]

Have fun,

There is a child in every adult and vice versa.

OfficialAwol:
Another opportunity to set things right was the Gideon Okar aborted coup. If he hadn't announced the removal the core northern states at his inaugural address. He would have waited until he has perpetuated himself in power.

But the bad guys won.

I wonder why God let the bad guys win?

The bad guys always win because they are more ruthless and callous.

Netherlands
The Kingdom of the Netherlands is made up of four constituent countries: the Netherlands themselves, plus the Caribbean islands of Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. The Charter of the Kingdom of the Netherlands is the law governing relations between the four parts, and has adapted itself to change since it was first enacted in 1954. For example, Suriname was a constituent country of the Kingdom from 1954 until 1975, when the South American nation gained full independence. In the Charter (Article 58) it is said that Aruba can launch, at any time, the procedure to put an end to the arrangements provided for in the legal text. This amounts in practice to declare independence.

Some sectors of the Dutch political spectrum support the completion of what they understand is a de facto decolonization process, and openly speak of granting independence to the three Caribbean islands. “If they call me tomorrow that they want out, then we’ll arrange it immediately,” Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte was quoted as saying in 2013. But this can not legally occur until the three Caribbean countries choose to. Aruba illustrates that apparent paradox: in 1977, islanders voted to become a fully sovereign state, but in the 1990s the decision was indefinitely postponed given that Aruba itself was unsure about the move. In Curaçao, the pro-independence movement has promised to deliver independence in the 2020s, but no further steps have been taken.

France
To conclude with, it may be surprising that the “indivisible” republic (Article 1 of the Constitution) is listed in this article. But in fact, France recognizes the right to independence of one of its territories —New Caledonia. It does so since 1998, when the French government and political representatives (both pro-independence and unionists) of the Oceanian nation signed the Nouméa Accords. The agreements —which were subsequently ratified in a referendum— foresee the holding of a vote on self-determination in November 2018 at the latest. If independence is rejected, the 1998 deal provides for the possibility of holding another two referendums on the same issue.
Following the Nouméa Accords, an amendment to the French Constitution was passed in order to insert into it a set of “transitional provisions”, which form its 13th title. These provisions envisage “the attainment of full sovereignty” by New Caledonia —provided, of course, that the local population votes for.

https://www.nationalia.info/new/10936/ten-countries-that-grant-the-right-to-independence-to-some-of-their-territories-and-france

Papua New Guinea
The second largest country in Oceania has no specific constitutional provisions that allow secession. Still, this did not prevent the government of Papua New Guinea and the provisional government of the island of Bougainville from signing a peace agreement in 2001 —ending a deathly conflict in the latter territory— which provided for the creation of a semi-autonomous Bougainville government within Papua New Guinea, the holding of elections starting from 2005, and as a culmination, the calling of a referendum on independence at some date between June 2015 and June 2020.

In 2016, the governments of Bougainville and Papua New Guinea struck a provisional deal on the holding of the referendum, which was set for 15 June 2019. According to analysts, it is likely that a majority will vote for separation. Independence would then create a new state of 250,000 inhabitants, located between Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.

United Kingdom
Without a Constitution that could forbid or allow it, the UK has shown in the last two decades that it could be ready to accept the secession of at least two parts of its territory —Scotland and Northern Ireland.

In the case of Scotland, UK prime minister David Cameron agreed with his Scottish counterpart Alex Salmond to hold an independence referendum in September 2014. The deal was struck after Salmond’s pro-independence SNP party won an absolute majority in the 2011 Scottish Parliament election. A “yes” vote would have led to the creation of a sovereign Scottish state.

In the case of Northern Ireland, the 1998 Good Friday Agreement —signed by the UK and Irish governments and eight political parties in Northern Ireland— opens the door to the reunification of Ireland by democratic means. London and Dublin will be forced to implement it as long as a majority in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland votes for in a referendum. Following the Brexit earthquake, Sinn Féin asked the UK Secretary of State —who may call such a vote at any time— to call a referendum on reunification

Yet another territory could be added to the list: the Falkland Islands, which in 2013 voted on keeping their status as a British overseas territory. The “yes” option won, with 99.8% votes for. Had the “no” vote been successful, a second referendum should have been called. In that event, it is plausible that independence would have been one of the options included on the ballot.

Moldova
Since independence, the former Soviet republic has faced two secessionist challenges, in Transnistria —which remains unresolved— and Gagauzia. The latter, mainly inhabited by a Turkic-speaking people, declared independence from Moldova in August 1991. But Gagauz leaders wished to maintain ties with the USSR or Russia, and the population feared that Gagauz identity would be diluted if Moldova ever joined a prospective Greater Romania —the possibility was being discussed at that time.

The dispute was resolved in 1994, after the Moldovan Parliament passed the law on the autonomy of Gagauzia, which contains a clause that allows the “external self-determination” of the territory. Under what conditions? The Gagauz legal code specifies that it could be triggered “if the status of the Republic of Moldova as an independent state changes.” In other words, this means that should Romania annex Moldova, Gagauzia would be entitled to secede and establish itself as an independent state.

Denmark
The Scandinavian country is a unitary state, but it also comprises two territories that enjoy a high degree of autonomy —Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Since the adoption of its 2009 Statute of Autonomy, Greenland has had the right to self-determination and independence recognized from the Danish state. The same right was denied to the Faroes when they sought to exercise it in 1946, after they held a controversial referendum. Nevertheless, several Danish prime ministers have in recent decades considered Faroese independence as a plausible, acceptable outcome.
Moreover, the recognition of the right to self-determination is one of the main clauses contained in a draft Constitution that the Faroes are expected to vote on 25 April 2018. If the Constitution is approved, the right to secession from Denmark will be legally established.

The Constitution also specifies the procedure to achieve independence: the seceding nation must do a formal request, a referendum in the region must then be held, and finally the transfer of powers to the council of the seceding nation and the partition of property must be organized.

In practice, however, Ethiopia is currently ruled by the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), which holds 500 of 547 seats in the federal Parliament —its allies control the remaining 47 seats. The EPRDF is accused by worldwide human rights organizations and by Ethiopian opposition groups alike of ruling the country with an iron hand and of not allowing any real democratic system to take root. Under those conditions, it is difficult to think that any territory would be now allowed to launch its own way towards independence. The 2016 crackdown against protests in Oromia —the country’s largest and most populated region— are an example of that.
However, the fact that the Constitution says what it says is no small deed, bearing in mind that any future regime change and transition to democracy could lead to a new scenario in which the right to secession could be effectively implemented.

Saint Kitts and Nevis
Another less well known, but equally interesting case of admission of the right to secession is to be found in the federal republic of Saint Kitts and Nevis, comprising those two homonymous islands in the Caribbean. The 1983 Constitution grants the smaller island —Nevis— the unilateral right to secede. The rule specifies that independence must be supported by the people of Nevis in a referendum by a two-thirds majority (article 113).
Nevis has organized two independence votes so far. The first one, in 1977, was held before the adoption of the Constitution, and was nullified by the central government of the federation, albeit more than 99% of voters supported separation. At that time, the pro-independence movement used to argue that, from the moment that the two islands had become a UK associated, semi-independent state, Nevis had found itself turned into a de facto colony of Saint Kitts, the Nevisian islanders’ quality of life having fallen in the meantime.

The second referendum took place in 1998, after the current Constitution had already been passed and the Federation was completely freed from UK rule. The Assembly of Nevis called the referendum. 62% of voters said “yes” to independence. The share therefore felt short of the required threshold, and independence was not achieved.

Liechtenstein
Nobody would imagine that such a tiny country could wish to further subdivide itself. But the fact is that the Principality of Liechtenstein is the only country in the world where each of its municipalities —numbering eleven— enjoys a constitutional right to independence (Article 4). The resident citizens of each individual municipality are the ones who can decide whether their village/town starts the secession procedure, the remaining citizens of Liechtenstein not being allowed to block it. No municipality has so far made use of that provision.

Such a striking principle even had the Venice Commission referring to it in an opinion issued in 2002. “The creation of a new, even smaller State, would seem to be inappropriate and undesirable,” the body said, but “this does not change the fact that a constitutional provision as discussed here is not in violation of international law.”

Indeed, the secession of some municipalities would result in unusual situations. If Schaan decided to become independent, Liechtenstein would be divided into two geographically disconnected halves. The independence of Schellenberg (3.5 square kilometers) would create the third smallest country in the world. Finally, if Planken (less than 400 inhabitants) went its own way, it would become the least populated country on Earth.

The debate on how states should meet demands for independence from a part of their territory is a recurrent one. Central governments often reject those demands, or try to thwart them. Appealing to the illegality of secession is one of the usual arguments. Sometimes, a corollary of this —often with the intention to ridicule pro-independence ideas— is the assertion that not one single country has laws allowing secession. However, a handful of past and present examples show otherwise. We have chosen ten of them from around the world.

Canada
After the 1995 self-determination referendum in Quebec, in which independence was rejected by a margin of just 1% of the votes, the Canadian government —at that time led by anti-independence Quebecois Jean Chrétien— asked the Supreme Court to clarify whether Quebec was allowed to unilaterally secede. In response, the Court issued the 2 S.C.R. 217 opinion of 1998, which can be summarized in three main points. The first one, that Canadian law does not provide that Quebec can unilaterally secede, nor that the province can dictate to Canada the terms of its separation. The second one, that Canada has no basis to reject Quebec’s independence under the democratic principle provided that a majority of Quebecois clearly show in a referendum that they want to split. And the third one, that if this latter scenario does occur, the Canadian and the Quebec governments must enter into negotiations to agree on the terms of separation.

The opinion of the Supreme Court gave arguments to both sides, as evidenced by the fact that both the Canadian and the Quebec governments welcomed it. The unionist camp felt that the Court had acknowledged that Quebec could not unilaterally secede, and furthermore, that the decision must be “clear”. In fact, the so-called Clarity Act was born out of this idea: approved by the Canadian Parliament in 2000, the law establishes that the wording of the question of any independence referendum should be clear enough, as should be clear any pro-independence majority. (The same year, the National Assembly of Quebec countered by passing the so-called Act 99, according to which the required “yes” majority in a referendum should be a mere 50% of the votes plus one.)
The pro-secession camp, on the other side, was given by the Court a possibly wider victory, as it became admitted that independence is above all a political issue, and that democratic decisions made by a majority should prevail over whether the Canadian legal corpus explicitly admits the possibility of Quebec independence.

Ethiopia
This is probably the world’s most explicit Constitution regarding secession and plurinationality. The Ethiopian Constitution proclaims the “unrestricted” right of “Nations, Nationalities and Peoples” to “self-determination up to secession” (Article 39.1). The African country —which from late 19th century until the end of the Cold War sought to build a highly centralized power— has been organized under a federal model since 1991, after the communist regime led by Mengistu Haile Mariam was overthrown. There are 11 federal regions/territories, most of them formed on an ethnolinguistic basis: the Oromo, the Somali and the Afar, for instance, each have their own region, with their own government and Parliament.

According to journalist and historian Colin Woodard, North America is made up of eleven distinct nations. He discusses the history of the continent, offering a revolutionary and revelatory take on American identity, and how the conflicts between them have shaped our past and mold our future. From the Deep South to the Far West, to Yankeedom to El Norte, Woodard reveals how each region continues to uphold its distinguishing ideals and identities today.

Today we take a look at the 11 Nations which, according to Colin Woodard, the author of "American Nations", exist inside the U.S.A.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0YAR_vsQZ8


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9XMTdRwWVg

Around 50 thousand people live on the Faroe Islands. But too many of them are men. Faroese women go abroad to study. Many don’t return. Men stay behind to live off the sea. Now the islands are enjoying a growing influx of women from the Philippines.

Antonette gets her folk dress out of the closet. Like a native Faroese woman, she’s getting ready for the Ólavsøka, the national holiday of the Faroe Islands. The 36-year-old actually comes from the metropolis of Manila. But life in the Philippines was too loud, stressful and uncertain for her. Antonette sought security and safety and married Regin Egholm a year ago. Her first daughter was born nine months later. Her new happiness on the other side of the world is complete.

Antonette is one of about 200 Filipinas who now live on the islands in the North Atlantic. Rain instead of sun, dried fish instead of tropical fruits - at first, their new life on the edge of Europe was a culture shock for many of them. And yet Filipinas and Faroe Islanders often share the same values. Family, faith and tradition are important in both cultures.

These values are often reason enough for young, liberated Faroese women to leave. The only university is too small and most men too old-fashioned. As a result, there are about 15 percent more men than women living on the islands today.

The government is trying to make the Faroes more attractive. New courses of study and more jobs are supposed to draw Faroese women back to the islands. But in the meantime, women from the Philippines are settling in their new home, where they form the largest ethnic minority on the islands, closely followed by women from Thailand.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1-LCixbumI&t=155s