₦airaland Forum

Choicegirl:
What percentage of university relationships lead to marriage or is it a waste of time?

in this present generation? 0%

Yorisb:
Haha. Dem no dey buy that trick(s) again oo!

so what will a muslim father do if i impregnate her daughter? abort it for her?
i will use all my resources to send the man to prison!

slimyem:
lie!!!

slimyem
are you a muslim? you want me to use the method for you?

RuuDie:
No. . . . .but if they'd played at higher tempo and forced Fulham to have less time on the ball, they probably would have been better off. Fulham had way too much possession and were way too comfy most of the game.

They were also very lucky the refs ruled Zamora's goal offside. . . . I reckon he was on!

how could they have raised the tempo when they were knackered even before the ball was kicked.
it's the effects of the horrible european nights. . . .whereas, their opponents(fulham) were well rested!

zamora was onside.

[quote author=190_@ link=topic=812001.msg9638882#msg9638882 date=1322337757]shakin my head [/quote]shake your brains too while you're at it.

RuuDie:
Hate to quote myself but Arsenal only have themselves to blame for not forcing the issue from the get go!

how so?
they have been winning since like forever - is it now a taboo to draw at home?

Administrator:
There is dis lady that came to make some purchase where i am working,we like each oda, d problem is that she is a muslim and am a christian. Her will not allow her to marry a christian or else she disagree with him, which she is might not be ready to do. Advice me on ways to convince her. Thanks

impregnate her!
that will force the hands of her parents to quickly marry her off to you. in fact, they will beg you to marry her.

i used the same method in 1983 when i had to marry a buddhist female

why is everyone blaming ramsey?
i thought he was decent today. arsenal were just tired - nothing to do with individual errors.

on another day, arsenal's tempo is better and they close down much faster than today.
it's the effect of playing in the midweek.

doyin13:
Jeez. . .Did you start the match from when Guittierez got sent off. That was ten minutes from the end.
Throughout the second half, United were making chances, and not only after the boy got a red card.

Unlike the first half, when they kept their shape and discipline, they were holes everywhere and free headers and wide open wingers and just utter chaos. Shikena.

show me a match united were drawing and they failed to raise the roof at old trafford in the second half. . . . .
alan pardew knew exactly what united would do and he simply told his players to defend with their lives.

a very perfect plan. forcing the issue would have left them exposed
and at 1-1, they were very comfortable.

Gekko:
lets swap Ramsey for Dembele  

dembele is a wonderful player! he should be playing in the big teams.
his hold up play, usage of the ball and general awareness is world class.

imagine if arsenal had him today playing behind van persie!

Flashaldrin:
nothing bro, na babaGod talk o, nor be me.

as if s[i]e[/i]x is the only sin in the world.

pretence is worse than s[i]e[/i]x.

gervinho and walcott doing the same mistakes sturridge made!

when you cut in and there are teammates in the box, you pass the ball to them.
those tame shots to schwarzer are good chances!

diaby is such a donkey!

Flashaldrin:
Dude has the right message but is spreading it in a wrong way.
the moral decadence of this present generation is as baffling as prophecised.
so nobody in this nl thinks sex before marriage is wrong smh!!

what is your business with the way people want to live their lives?

fulham using the ball very very well.
when did the become such a possession side!

zamora - offside(that was so close)!

sexsinners:
STOP Being Intimate , IN GODS NAME STOP.YOU ARE DESTROYING YOUR SOUL . IT'S ETHER GOD OR YOUR BOYFRIEND/GIRLFRIEND

PICK WISELY

what a wankstain!

[quote author=BABE! link=topic=809995.msg9627590#msg9627590 date=1322185993]lol. pm.[/quote]cute!

segunjowo:
I go love oh!
see difficulties on the way connecting two love bugs. It's why Ii requested Seun to develop apps to enable lovers send private message to whoever they love on NL. That way, you won;t have to give your phone numbers, emails, bbpins etc to the whole wide world. Babe!/Cooger, wish you guys the very best.

wait for ya time!

kenis:
There are quite a number of gals who have their real pix on thier profiles. If gals could(including ugly gals) why would't guyz? I have never seen I guy in NL who has his real pix except me.

Could it be that they are too handsome and don't want to be disturbed by girlz (or may be jobless girls)?
What could be the reason?

why do you want to see the pictures of a fellow man like you?
is there something you are not telling us about your s[i]e[/i]xual deviance?

doyin13:
Guy . . You are not defending well when the opposition is making chances left right and center. If you are having to make clearances from your goal line and the ball is hitting your upright every other minute, then you are my dear pundit not defending well.

of which by then, they were a man down, playing at old trafford - what the heck do you expect them to do? throw themselves open and get sodomized? they defended well considering the circumstances they found themselves. they were a man down.

Fact is they should have conceded and that they didn't was all down to United's profligacy in front of goal than any idea of Newcastle's resilience.

any team in that position at old trafford should have conceded with a man down. united had 29 attempts on target with just a goal to show for it.
some of the saves were world class from krul - and you are coughing megedefegede. when strikers don't score - he's wasteful. nothing to do with the world class save that was made to deny the striker in the first place. your punditry is shocking!

They kept the ball a lot better in the first half and the chances were kept to a minimum. Second half, they had bugger all going forward.

any away team of newcastle standard would be found out at old trafford. united were always going to raise the tempo in the 2nd half.

bxg:
Youngs only good game was agnst arsenal Bloody Ripoff

west brom
bolton
chelsea

[quote author=Mr_TA link=topic=716327.msg9637888#msg9637888 date=1322327739]It was an unfortunate result but our finishing let us down. Ref was poor with that decision but it happens and i wont complain too much.

Also credit to Newcastle, that was fantastic backs to wall defending.

Rooney, Ashley young and Hernandez were very poor imo.[/quote]i'm not sure if they were poor or newcastle defenders were on 'caine

the hernandez header had beaten krul hands down, he was static and i thought that's it then i saw simpson's foot trap the ball on the line

doyin13:
They no defend anything, . . Should have taken Ben Arfa off early and brought on a big man. They have had good success playing that way all season and would have caused United some problems.

i am not even sure you watched the game.

newcastle defended with their lives. united must have had over 15 shots on target in the last 10 mins.
krul was superb. enough goal-line clearances from simpson, r taylor, s taylor, etc. what would you call those?
that's fantastic defending. you are asking them to take ben arfa off, how does that translate to their brilliant defending?

have you lost your ability to comprehend?
i said newcastle defended well, you are saying they should have brought a striker on after going a man down?

nateevs:
Nice game, 3pts, clean sheet. When was the last time we said that?

as long as you keep lampard away from the starting xi, victories are guaranteed!

montelik:
Newcastle must have used jazz. How did they not concede in d final 30 mins?

they defended very well - that's how to defend with your back against the wall.
they threw everything at the incoming shirts.

hernandez could have had a hatrick, same as ashley young.
what a game. the penalty they had should never have been - rio won the ball cleanly!

then hernandez's goal, he was onside when giggs made the pass.

i got into a pub debate sometime last week about these 2 gladiators.

who do you think would win if spartacus and gannicus were to fight in the arena?

spartacus
https://blastr.com/assets_c/2009/12/SpartacusAndyWhitfield-thumb-550x310-30663.jpg

gannicus
https://blastr.com/assets_c/2011/01/SpartacusGannicusDustinClare011011-thumb-550x314-55101.jpg

rest in peace!

Gluckdude:
This topic has been really controversial, but what pisses me off the most is when someone comes up and says the story is cooked up. why on earth will i spend my time cooking up and imangining stories, and if my wife was to be here, she will say the exact thing i have highlighted in my post.
that aside, i have really seen some ladies candid opinion about the whole issue. i love the critics. they make me a better person at times.we all just live in a diferent world.i would have been happier being single honestly, at least i will be more successful, i can have kids without having to marry. seems this marriage thing is basically for the benefit of ladies, 2face is single with kids and very succcessful.why bother with marriage self. the thing tire me oo. i just want a partner who will be in tune with my thoughts, right now, i want a moderate spender.and a very honest woman abi na partner self i go call am.i payed a huge pride price,you already know the tribe that does that, so i dont think HONESTY is too much for me to ask for in return.
and for the ladies blabbing about sex,i dont know if there are men that marries just for the sole aim of havng a sex partner, this is far from it.
i am not very happy most of this ladies are supporting what she did.and you guys are even coming up to confess of doing more. talking about wallet, she has complete access to it and i dont ask her what for? i can withdraw 20k from the atm and when we drive to the market, i just hand her my wallet, she comes back after getting what she wants and gives it back to me, i dont ask how much is left or how much was spent, meanwhile all the things she went to purachase might just be about 9k goods, but i dont bother. i just hate it that she will stand in my front and demand money for something and inflate it on a routine basis, even takes transport fare to purchase it, that is very callous.
its like this
wife: "sweetheart
me: yes
wife: Junior pampers is finished.
me: how much is it sold self.(cos i always forget,got a lot on my mind to bother about the constant price of pampers)
wife: it's 3000 naira( the most appreciated answer i would have loved here is" the last time i bought it, it was 2400, but give me 3k just incase it is up again. now can someone tell me, wont this be honest enough. she will still be geting the 3k, but in a more decent manner.)
me: bring my wallet
wife: goes in to bring wallet.
me: hand over 3k to her
wife: what about bike money, or do you expect me to trekk or most time while returning the wallet she will grab the little change in the wallet, i only count my wallet money in thousands, anything below that could be gone, i dont care. but the yellow thousand papers have to be accounted for. if you are taking it in a static state. meaning i did not handover my wallet to her.this whole thing is about what i want in my home. i dont know what those husband of this NL ladies want.
that said, if i am in her shoes, i have already stolen 600 bulks, while take bike more again which is just about 100 naira. my own concern is not about the intangible money, but the silly,annoying lie, korokoro lie for my house.

mr husband, this matter is simple!

start doing groceries by yourself. if it will take your time, ask your messenger to do it in your office.
better still, hire housemaids from calabar. they wouldn't nick your money.

yes, she shouldn't be taking more than she needs but it's still petty to me.
like you said, we live in different world and we see things from different perspectives.

p.s. - try and get your wife a job too instead of giving her money in bits like a housemaid. . . . .also try and be less stingy with money!
it breeds petty thieves.

Ibime:
Torres is a nervous wreck. I dont see any Lampard in Spanish team. Players 2x better than Mata have been unable to bring the best out of him for Spain.

so how did gerrard and mascherano bring out the best in torres @ anfield? this same torres has scored 12 goals against chelsea in as many games before your owner shelled the top dollar on him.

why is messi ordinary in argentina? why is ronaldo ordinary in portugal?
out of all the superb players germany took to the world cup last year, how many of them have become balls of fire in their respective clubs.
abeg, club football is different from the national team. stop beating torres with xavi/iniesta nonsense. that xavi/iniesta cannot bring the best out of torres does not mean others cannot. . . .

Face it mate, Torres problems are psychological. He was playing brilliant 5 weeks ago (with Lampard), had one bad game against Arsenal and is now back to a shadow of himself.

far from it. lampard is too slow. i have explained the problem to you.
go and watch torres @ liverpool and see how quickly kuyt, gerrard and maxi used to isolate him with the last man. the passes are quicker.
pepe reina distributes the ball better than petr cech(another relic that needs to be replaced by the way). . . .and before you know it. . . .it's torres and the last man.

@ chelsea, your tempo is too slow for torres. by the time the ball gets to him, his markers are all over him like a rash.
when drogba was the point man - this did not matter. drogba's physical bulk still allowed him to bully most defenders - it does not matter if you mark drogba or not. 8 out of 10 times, drogba would still have his way. torres is a different kind of striker. his strength is in his silky skills. isolate him 1 v 1 and see what happens.

He should chill on the bench, go see a shrink, deal with his "issues", then take the opportunity to shine in Carling Cup or as a substitute and he'll get his chance again just like any other player in the squad. I think one calendar year is enough grace to give a player to find his confidence.

chill on the bench? so he will find form from the bench, abi? this is why you're not a manager.
torres should be starting every game. build the team around him. by default, he's the most expensive player @ chelsea. the team should be built around him. the players who wouldn't make torres a better player should be axed. that includes drogba/lampard. however, the team is built around lampard - if mata has to be played wide to accommodate lampard then fat frank is the problem. he is the poision! at 33, he cannot run the midfield again.

Unlike you, Torres is not a primary concern of mine. Chelsea is.

chelsea won't move forward without making torres a better player.
the defence is decent - the midfield actually creates more than the opponents that have beaten chelsea. the attack is the problem.
villas-boas system is actually working as it shows chelsea really do create chances but the conversion rate is the wahala.

sort torres - and chelsea will fly!

Gaggi:
Who be dis zombie? u seem to be full of urself because some faceless women are praising u. How will i argue with an animal, worst of all a coogar. U son of a dog. Better get your tail between your legs and run out of this thread or i will run u out.
U dare reply gaggi? i'm your god, your master. Anuofia.

may amadioha bless all the women in your household with a dozen albino midgets each!
you homoerotic nuisance - you made a daft remark, i called you out on it and you are here talking thrash like satan sodomized you.
are you blind? myopic? perhaps moronic?

you better tape it shut before i bring the 4 apocalyptic horsemen on your lineage. you sound so g[i]a[/i]y, if you fart in a test tube as a sp[i]e[/i]rm donor, it's certain half of it would be used.

MRbrownJAY:
fair enough, thats how YOU feel but when you decide that this is how OP should feel is when you are wrong. dangote will tell you that $1million is nothing while many have never even seen a tenth of that. should we therefore ALL say that $1milla is chicken change?
as they say: each should cut their coat according to their size.

fair enough - but the man is petty! what can 300 naira buy in nigeria?

i am sorry to say that this money was NOT LOST but TAKEN from him in a deceitful manner.
well lets put that into context
- item of 2400 were charged 3000 thats a 25% over charged, so in the real world if the shirt cost £80, you would have been charged £100. dwell on that for a minute. . . . . . . . . .- item that cost 1000 were charged 1500 thats a 50% hike, so a £75.99 shirt would have cost you £114, lol. to me thats pure DAYLIGHT ROBBERY, but i guess, to each their own!

what kind of mathematics is this? had the woman taken an equivalent of 5000 naira like you projected, the husband would have beheaded her.
if a man can squeal so much over 300 naira, dang it - he would kill for an amount 16 times more.

at last, we are starting to make some grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . .  the wifey got anything she desired from hubby so i am as clueless as you as to why she would have the need to inflate prices.

the husband is a stingy oaf!

sadly many are irresponsible due to women.

even the unmarried men? even the youths?
women made em irresponsible?

i never said women DIDNT play a big role in any union, i said many men wouldnt settle for a women, and even, NOT get married if it was only down to men. the reason many get married is because of WOMEN's desire for a white fairytale wedding. many will be happy living together happily ever after, without the need for a wedding.

oh please!
like some men don't like the fairytale wedding too.

if my partner needs gifts in order to satisfy my sex.ual needs in the BEST POSSIBLE MANNER then that IS blackmail because, if i dont offer these gifts, then i will be left without a great intimate life. where are MY damn gifts!!!!

even you? damn, you are getting it wrong!!!
incentives don't work like that. so you are saying if i don't get my bonuses, i wouldn't work to my best to at least earn my basic salary? is that what you are proving here? there's a basic s[i]e[/i]xual performance. the bonus comes once in a while and it always surfaces when there's a promise of a gift.

if Mrs CC was not fukcing Mr CC's brains out, due to the X5 issue, then that would BE blackmail. the blackmail is when any wifey only acts RIGHT (get motivated), in the bedroom, when she is rewarded for it.

that is not what i was saying.
she acts right when she's in the mood(which cannot be every night) and she acts right whenever the issue of gift arises.

depending on the issue, you are right but i can find many instance where that ideology is completely wrong. marriage and women is one of them.

marriage and women are not there at all. you need to be married to truly understand what it means to be with a woman.
all those live-in stunts we all did at one point in our lives or the other is a different ball game. in marriage, you are required to explain every step you make, you cannot just make any decision without your partner. it's quite different, my friend. if you are not married, you would never know these things.

i will never pretend to say i understand what women go through in labor, just like women will never understand what we men go through when we eja.culate. stay on the subject. it's all about MAKING SENSE, and what this OP's wife did makes NONE OF IT.

maybe it makes sense, perhaps it doesn't.
i can only speak for myself. however, if my partner is pinching little change from me, i would completely ignore it. what she has taken wouldn't turn me into a destitute overnight for bleeps' sake. why would it matter? if it irks me, i would go into her wallet too and pinch her coins. equation balanced!

now, marriage and cohabiting with your partner is EXACTLY the same thing, so i dont have to be married to understand the mechanics of ANY union. even the LAW is the same!
if i marry this damsel today, it wont change ONE INCH the union we had, the only difference is that there will now be a contract for it.

marriage and cohabiting is not the same thing. if i am cohabiting with a chic, i can kick her out at will.
i cannot kick a wife out at will. it's so much different. maybe this is why you don't get it.

with a wife - 2 became 1. my money is hers and vice versa.
with a chic staying under ma roof. 2 is not by any means 1. and my money is my damn money. if she messes with it, i would dislocate her kneecap!

musKeeto:
Have fun with Siri, you're just abig bag of contracepdictions. First you hail the Iphone's speed then blast the Galaxy's processor speed,
Then you ignore the fact that the S2 has a better display.
then you say 'don't worry about the irrelevance' lol,

what's the difference between 5Mbps and 4.89Mbps? the human perception won't even notice this difference in speed?
you really know nothing about computer technology. if you need 2Mbps to send a file. do you think the processor with 5Mbps will do it faster than the other one? since both devices have more speed than the task required, you wouldn't notice this differences.

And I'm shocked you'd call the graphics on the S2 'wack', not as pretty as the iphone but definitely not wack,
Then you accept the iphone is slower, going as far to say speed is overrated, wtf?

the graphics is wack.
apple iphone 4s is using the a5 processor - same processor as the ipad-2!

Iphone 4s has become more of a classy device, or 'designers' phone, cos of as you rightly mentioned its price not its performance,
When it comes to performance, Galaxy S trumps it. simple and short,

galaxy trumps siri? performance?
do you know the meaning of performance?

So buy your classy device, but when the big boys roll, keep that small tiny screen in your pocket. I'd rather use the casio fx-300ms thanks,

that is because you cannot afford the iphone 4s.
i have got the black one as a gift from a girlfriend.
leave me your address, i will send it to you as a christmas gift!

Ibime:
I dont have time to humour either yourself or Nateevs so I will address this once and for all. First of all Mata made 6 unsuccessful passes against Liverpool so if you like, you can fudge all you want with your 43/45 stats whilst Nateevs nod head like Agama lizard despite posting the heatmap earlier. Why didnt you give us the Blackburn stats where Mata made 43/60 and Lampard made 70/80?  

chelsea won that match against blackburn . . . .whatever stats both posted is irrelevant!
we are looking at chelsea's failure, you are talking megede fegede as usual. against liverpool, mata was better.
this season, overall - mata has been better. you either accept that or tape it shut when i am lecturing you.

Neither am I of the inane opinion that Mata and Lamps are in competition for the same spot. Infact like I said before, Im a fan of Mata. It is you and Nateevs who are busy with either Mata or Lampard debate.

Anyone who has eyes can see that Chelsea play with inside-forwards (until the Leverkusen game), where our wingers have a roaming role, meaning they have more tactical freedom whilst you insist he is being shunted onto the wing.

yes, they are - mata is not a wide player. lampard occupies his position.
shunt mata wide and there's a problem - then you are so daft to bring the roaming inside forwards into this argument - little wonder your full-backs keep getting baptism of fire with nothing to protect them. little wonder glen johnson could roam undisturbed to sodomize ashley cole. malouda was busy doing inside-forwards - all this rubbish to accommodate the relic - frank lampard! christ - stop being a sod!

Have a look at Mata touch graphic against Arsenal:

you have taken 80% of his talents away playing him there. mr lampard is too daft to play a one-time pass to torres!
lampard is too lethargic and his build-up is slow. by the time he realizes torres is free, the opponents would have caught torres offside or marked el nino out of the game. drogba(in his prime) does not mind as his robustness would bully his markers anyway. that's the difference!

If you want to see what someone who is "shunted on the wings" touch graphic looks like, have a look at Walcott in the same game
So no, Mata does have sufficient freedom to affect the game. QED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.)

but to what end?
that's the £64,000 question. didn't redknapp identify this issue with tottenham? playing van der vaart on the wing?
do you want me to print out what he said about rafael? he said he is always attracted to the centre thus leaving assou-ekotto exposed!
redknapp has found a spot for van der vaart, just behind adebayor with bale and lennon roaming - the evidence is there as tottenham has been winning games since then. football is not calculus!!

Secondly, I know you are famous for shaky knowledge of Maths after your infamous "ratio" debate with Dayokanu, so lemme help you.
mata: 407/476 pass completion - 85.5%
lampard: 587/691 pass completion - 84.9%

you are a tool if you think 0.6% difference is not a big deal in pass completion ratio. if a wide player is completing more passes than i do as a central midfielder then it's time to quit football! show me any wide player that posts better passing statistics than his attacking midfielder.
there are scores of examples to look at. start from man city down to wigan. only chelsea can allow such abomination!


then again, why did you conveniently ignore the liverpool game where mata posted 96% pass completion where relic lampard was nowhere to be found in spite of being in the position to pull the strings. you are an obdurate w@nker!

Big difference there mate, you have really proven your point conclusively.   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2.)

awesome difference!

3rdly, if you look at any touch graphic, you see that Mata (eg against Liverpool) plays much closer to the box (receiving the ball in his own half 7 times  out of 52):
whilst Lamps plays conventionally in the thick of the action (receiving the ball in his own half 50% of the tim
So in conclusion, Mata should have more access to Key Passes due to the fact he plays closer to the box . . . . . . . . . . (3.)

it's called hiding in football!
there's no analysis that could have made a wide player post 96% pass completion.
abeg, list all the best wide players in world football and tell me which of them posted 96% pass completion in any game be it friendly or competitive.
yet, you cowards complain torrres does not score goals. how would he when lampard who is ahead 2 markers was playing deep in the defence.
lampard hiding after being sodomized by charlie adam and lucas. no wonder chelsea lost.

Despite this, Lampard still has joint record for key passes in the Prem, although Mata could catch up with him soon.

irrelevant!
his joint key passes in the prem has placed chelsea in the 5th position.
his statistics only glorify himself - not the team. see ruud van nistelrooy @ man utd for comparison.

Finally, I would invite you use Guardian chalkboards to check how many tackles and interceptions they each win per match.
I'll help you. . .for example against Blackburn, Lamps made 3 successful tackles and 3 interceptions whilst Mata made 0 tackles and 0 interceptions.

mata is not a tackler - i don't see how this statistic is relevant. we are talking about their creativity, you are talking tackles and interceptions.
how many tackles does xavi hernandez make in a match? he is not busquets or keita. it is when a player's creativity is lacking that he adds other irrelevant stuff to his armoury. chelsea play 4-2-3-1.

------back five-----
----mikel--ramirez---
mata--lampard---malouda
--------sturridge----------

tell me how lampard's tackles are relevant to the game when he's got ramirez and mikel obi as a shield!
you are a disgrace!

This shows you that both players have different responsibilities. Lamps fights in the thick of the action whilst Mata has more freedom. If you want to compare attacking input, how about defensive? So next time Nateevs complains about Lamps attacking input in a match where we lose 5-3, I'll ask him again. . . . . what do you say about the guy with the most freedom?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4.)

yes, i should compare xavi's defensive stats to yaya toure.
since yaya toure makes more tackles than xavi, toure is the best defender on the planet. with this analogy too, sam khedira is better than mesut ozil!
what a plank!!!

So lemme ask you, if you want Mata in Lamps position, are you ready for Mata to receive the ball in his own half 50% of the time? Would you expect him to track players and make tackles and interceptions like Lampard does. If your answer is no, then you have already answered your own question.

why should he?
with mikel and ramirez/meirelez putting a shield to screen the back four, mata is doing the van der vaart role, the aguero role, etc.
look at tottenham. . . . .modric n scott parker are the shield. lennon + bale + van der vaart roam behind adebayor(lone striker)
look at man city. . . . . . barry n toure are the shield. david silva + aguero + milner roam behind balotelli/dzeko(lone striker).
so i should expect aguero to have the same defensive stats as barry? or van der vaart to make the same number of tackles as scott parker?
you need help!

Finally, digest these stats:
Lamps 7 goals, 5 assists in 2011/2012. 19 goals in this calendar year. Top scorer, top assister. . . . Look for scapegoat somewhere else jare!  

with 4 penalty kicks, few corner kicks, and indirect/direct freekicks, i am not impressed.
chelsea won games without lampard at the start of the season. lampard is not good enough to run chelsea's midfield any more.
he's past his prime as he's seen better days - he should make way for a new midfield general - juan mata!

Only Nateevs can turn a clear case of 2 games where defensive instability cost Chelsea into a referendum on Lampard.
I will not humour y'all with any further debate.
I love Lampard. I love Mata. There are 5 other positions that need cleansing in the Chelsea first team. Focus on that!

if you want torres to start scoring - axe lampard.
chelsea must divorce lampard and drogba. qed!

MRbrownJAY:
she has lied and many DO steal by the looks of the responses on this thread.
here is a CLUE: many marry because of what the BIBLE teaches them, while it also teaches that THOU SHALL NOT LIE/STEAL. now see how they are quick to disregard that verse or pretend that there is a clause that says that "a small LIE/THEFT is ok". lol

i don't consider such stealing, i'm afraid.
i married a wife, not a pauper. 300 naira, 600 naira, na money be that? i won't miss these amounts. this is what i am telling you.
the number of pound coins i have lost in my pockets could have bought range rover evoque - so when a husband loses the equivalent to his own wife and squeals like a castrated pig - there's a big issue.

if an employee inflates the prices of the items you send him to buy, and THEREFORE, pockets the change for his personal use WITHOUT TELLING YOU, is it "right" in your world? wouldnt you be mad as an employer?! would you call the employer petty because he had morals?

it depends on the difference involved. if my employee buys a shirt for £75.99 and says it's £80, i wouldn't be arsed to think he/she has stolen!
in the real world, the difference the op is squealing about is less than $5.

even if your employer gave you money for TRANSPORT?! that's a clear indication of DECEIT to me, and as a boss it would be automatic DISMISSAL.

employers are different and this story is not even credible to begin with!
what would make a wife steal at will if she's got money to spend?

it would shock you to know that many men dont even need fancy homes, fancy weddings etc. if it was down to most of these guys, they probably wouldnt even get married. most do because of WOMEN.

i don't disagree with the emboldened. a large majority of the men out there are irresponsible.

they'd rather go to the bar and chill with their homeys very often BUT they also dont. they buy many fancy unnecessary stuff for the home that they wouldnt, if it wasnt for "wifey". they dont go clubbing every evening and dont frequent strip clubs any longer DUH!!!!

just like i have said, there are loads of irresponsible men out there but you have hardly discovered the cure of h-i-v here.
keep your eye on the ball. if there's no need for men to marry, they wouldn't have to! women play big roles, if you doubt it then i cannot help you.

when you get married you have to adapt to married lifestyle, cooking is part of this lifestyle. sometimes women cook and sometimes MEN do. if it has been decided that the guy brings the paycheck while the wifey care for the household then SO BE IT but that shouldnt be used later against that man for blackmailing purposes.

i don't see how motivation can be seen as blackmail.
educate me, please.

mrs cc wants her husband to buy her x5 and she motivates him in a way she knows would inspire the husband to shell the top dollar. how the heck is that blackmailing?

believe me bro, marriage has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand. . . . . . . .  unless i have to have AIDS to understand the dangers of the disease OR i have to be rich to understand how rich people think? come on, stay on the subject!

sometimes, you have to cop personal experience to see things clearly. there's a reason people say experience is the best teacher.
without going through some things in life - you are as clueless as a mannequin. how can you ever describe the labour pains of a pregnant woman if you have not experienced it, mr-brownjay? biology?  hahaha - got ya!

nateevs:
Abeg. . I can use a few more avenues. Nateevs@yahoo.com

you can query your inbox now!