Coogar's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Coogar's Profile › Coogar's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 (of 1148 pages)
dayokanu: This show of love between coogar and tpia sha.https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyll95OLR11qi3z16.gif every woman needs love - including tpia! |
[quote author=tpia@]^ more name dropping?[/quote]define name dropping |
pro01: You frustrated, forlorn old witch, what are you doing here? You should know there's no hope of finding a husband here if you can't find one in real life. Take your decaying ass to Jesus, for He alone can love you the way you are.https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwnargGDHx1qgqpp5.gif |
alpha conde: Plz can someone explain what the documentary is all about myself and some others are unable to view this video.women selling the arv drugs prescribed to them to reduce the viral load in their bodies they discovered these arv drugs make people tipsy so they grind it n add to the local gin these women felt this way of living is better than pröstitution these women don't care about the side effects the men taking the alcohol might cop the most annoying thing is they only make 1000 Kenyan shillings(only £7) profit! these women are exchanging the lives of their men for £7 i foresee another discovery of an incurable disease in kenya in the next 3 yrs! this clip is depressing!! poverty is a curse!! |
dayokanu: At the same time? Yeepa mogbe. Tope shey na true?only pataki can answer that..... |
dayokanu: Promiscuous?she did david and pataki ............on the same night! ![]() |
dayokanu:i would be disappointed if debosky nails tpia! arghhh, it would break my heart without any hope of redemption! tell you what - i would be on the maury talk show bawling like a baby....even though i had to kick tpia out of me life cos of her promiscuous ways, i still love her with all me heart |
pro01: Lol. Thanks Coogar, but I no get power to dey respond point-for-point again, as e be say them no get point at all.don't let debosky fool you - he's a sly predator! he's just playing the devil's advocate or playing possum to lure women into his den. of course he knows the truth but then women don't want to hear the truth! debosky is single-handedly the most notorious male-whorë this forum has ever had! his record makes okafor look like an amateur! |
debosky: Pregnancy after sex is not an accident - it is the intended outcome by design. Flying on a plane and dying is an accident - it's intended outcome is to transport you to your destination.pregnancy after sex is an accident(if the participants did not plan it)! you work with the knife in the kitchen - 9 out of 10 times, nothing happens! however, we all know working with the knife can cut you and that is an accident! not all sex sessions lead to conception, the female body is not even programmed that way! It depends on how hot she was.let's assume she's like tpia@ Now seriously, I didn't absolve women of all blame and these incidences cannot be wholly eradicated. However, if the major cause is addressed (philandering men) then we can focus on the smaller contributions from the likes of Potiphar's wife.when a woman is desperate to have a child, she initiates the moves and this is related to this topic! married women who raise bastards set out deliberately to have it so - it's not an accident! |
debosky: So flying by air and having an ACCIDENT is equivalent to shaggging and producing the natural result of copulation?if we are talking about accidents and risk then it's the same! just like you are not sure if a plane would crash or not so is a man not sure of the outcome of any sex session he engages himself in! I never said men corralling their soldiers would end the problem, but it would eliminate the overwhelming majority of the problem.lemme ask you a question: if you were joseph in the bible, would you risk going to prison and possibly death by defying your oga's madame? a nigerian joseph o! |
debosky: Men will continue to remain at fault - even though pro01's logic appears sound, it is ultimately flawed.you silly rabbit - why is your logic upside down? Yes men do the asking, but why do they ask married women? Why not ask only single ones?some of these men are not even aware the women they poke are married! have you been to the nysc camps with these married women hiding their wedding rings to lure young unsuspecting men to their beds? My view is simple - anyone who shags should assume a pregnancy will occur unless he/she has taken sufficient precautions to avoid it or confirm it hasn't happened. You can't shag a woman, deploy your soldiers and then act in ignorance when they carry out their duties. I value my soldiers and ensure they are only deployed where I want them to carry out a mission!any passenger who enters an airplane should assume death is inevitable!! what are you talking about, young man? yes - you can shäg a woman, deploy your soldiers and not expect them to carry out their duties if the woman promised to take care of their misdemeanour! this is why pharmacy stores sell "morning after" pills - they are fairly cheap too! the responsibility falls on the woman to take care of business as she's the last line of defence! No army commander will blame civilians if his soldiers act in a way he didn't intend, he blames himself for not controlling his troops.say that to the commandant of the anti-riot policemen! it's the collective responsibility of both parties to ensure peace and tranquility! if one or both parties decide to shirk their responsibility, then expect mayhem! a woman who lures a man into deploying soldiers with the promise of taking care of business only to come back 3 weeks later to say she's missed her period is a con-woman! As men initiate the act, removing the initiation will (largely) remove incidences of siring other men's kids from occurring.sheer naivety! women initiate these moves in cases like this where she's desperate to have a child by all means. you really think okon can look into the eyes of his madame and initiate moves? did joseph initiate any move when portiphar's wife tugged his boxer shorts? As long as men continue to ask AND hold instruments of coercion such as jobs, money, assistance, protection and so on, these incidences will continue to occur.you are being myopic - you are looking at it from the general view when you should be focussing on women who go out there with the sole aim of looking for a spërm donor to get them a child! |
debosky: Lean back boy - if you were fathered by a strange man and never knew your dad don't blame it on me.https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2i14tjDGj1r9rw6k.gif |
[quote author=Efemena_xy]C'mon stop giggling. ![]() I'm trying to help you both na! [/quote]oh please - tpia@ is a closed chapter after i caught her poking my driver..... |
[quote author=Efemena_xy]Ah! So you're worried about loosing your coogar? You must have been slacking in some "departments". Not to worry. You just need to: ~ Ignore him. E go tire. If that doesn't work then: ~ Dress s/e/x/y ![]() ~ Cook better for him ![]() ~ Improve upon your bedmatic skills ![]() ~ Fast 'n pray that he comes back to you ![]() *** Faints!!***[/quote]https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmleirkje31qiee4r.gif |
orelove4liff: I lov dis educativ thread and i greet all d alphas and pastors in d house.pls can sum1 tel me why God sent so many prophets which is nw causin confusion among human beings?and is God himself religious? I knw God must hav knwn d consequences of sendin so many prophets b4 sendin dem.i also want to say dat both d holy books contradit demselves if u read dem very well.https://www.gogifs.com/gifs/wwe4.gif |
Ibime: Drogba has been maintaining 40% till Torres came.you are a disgrace - how did you arrive @ 40% when lampard consistently outscored drogba in the first 2 seasons? must you lie? this is the list of the top scorers @ chelsea by the season....tell me how drogba could have maintained 40% when midfielders have consistently outscored the strikers? chelsea's top goalscorers(league)by the season 2004/5 - frank lampard(13 goals) 2005/6 - frank lampard(16 goals) 2006/7 - didier drogba(20 goals) 2007/8 - frank lampard(10 goals) 2008/9 - nicholas anelka(20 goals) 2009/10 - didier drogba(29 goals) 2010/11 - florent malouda(13 goals) 2011/12 - sturridge/malouda(11 goals) drogba: (10/72) + (12/72) + (20/64) + (8/65) + (5/68) + (29/103) + (11/69) drogba(the most prolific chelsea striker) copped 95 goals out of the 513 league goals chelsea scored between 04/05 and 10/11 season(when torres joined) and the fat charlatan thought drogba could have kept the strike force @ producing 40% of the total team goals scored! drogba's individual output is 18.5% and yet ibime keeps lying to us drogba kept the level @ 40% - you are a disgrace to every adult responsible for your mental development! damn - your math needs revival! https://i49.tinypic.com/n65du1.jpgibime, went to go and dig up useless stats - you think you can bamboozle your way out of this? you are in trouble tonight - I'd make you want to drink your nan's piss, you fat obtuse charlatan! show us the chance conversion rate and stop the ambiguous stats dug out from dayokanu's sticky rectum! Meanwhile how come you reduce a fraction's value by reducing the denominator?what is this autistic savant talking about? Ibime: lolsee this onanist! i would decompose your adipose tissues in Laplace transforms! who do you think you are talking to, you blubbery pederast!! |
debosky: I don't see any sinking of standards - a striker should score, no doubt about it. But when he doesn't, his overall game play has to be assessed for its merits, and Torres' overall game yesterday was excellent.dayokanu is an imbëcile! just because chelsea managed to produce 2 top scorers in 4 seasons, he concludes their strikeforce is superior- it took drogba 3 full seasons to score 20 league goals @ chelsea but the tool expects torres to do it in 1.5 seasons. drogba could only manage 2 golden boots in 8 seasons but the odious obtuse ibime expects torres to score score 40 goals under 2 seasons - i don't know why i visit this section - it's like talking to a brick wall! van persie has scored 7 goals for man utd and he's unhappy his assist column reads 0 or 1. he said he wants to work on creating goals for his teammates - now that's a team player!! where is that fat bleached transvestite known as ibime! the man who thought llorente might be tired actually meant llorente was tired! if there's a place called heaven, ibime wouldn't be in it - he lies, he misappropriates facts - the fat geriatric serial wänker! |
dayokanu: The poor Chelsea strikers have topped the scorers chart twice in the 4 seasons under review yet this oaf tells us 2 out of 4 is one-off?this is because you are genetically obtuse! now look at this example..... chelsea thread fc has nateevs and ibime as strikers bayern thread fc has dayokanu and a40 as strikers arsenal thread fc has debosky and mukina2 as strikers season 1 ibime(30goals) nateevs(4 goals) dayo(28 goals) a40(20 goals) debo(25 goals) muki(23 goals) season 2 ibime(4 goals) nateevs(15 goals) dayo(22 goals) a40(19 goals) debo(30 goals) muki(17 goals) season 3 ibime(10 goals) nateevs(20 goals) dayo(18 goals) a40(32 goals) debo(22 goals) muki(17 goals) season 4 ibime(9 goals) nateevs(40 goals) dayo(33 goals) a40(29 goals) debo(25 goals) muki(23 goals) chelsea thread fc produced 2 top scorers in 4 seasons but who has the best strike force? who has the worst strikeforce? can you count? do you have a brain? you are a pleb! |
Ibime: So goals scored by strikers was 31% until Torres joined, then it dropped to 16%?the obnoxious odious obese charlatan speaketh! The funny thing about unintelligent people like coogar is that when they try to play with numbers, they end up looking stupid. In other words, Chelsea strikers contributed 31% of chelseas goals over the last 4 year's. In the last year that number dropped to 16% when Torres joined. Intact that number musta been closer to 40% but Torres 16% reduced the weighted average to 31%.how wont it drop to 16% when drogba(torres' strike partner) contributed less than 7 league goals all season - and this isn't the first time he would - he recorded the same poor stats in 07/08, so age is not the factor! Another stupidity of using such metric for comparison is that teams who play 4-4-2 have double the number of strikers on the pitch than 4-5-1 teams so more of their goals would be scored by strikers.arsenal played 4-2-3-1 last season when van persie scored 37 goals all through! other clubs have been playing 4-2-3-1 ever since chelsea dreamt of it! before torres joined, it was mostly anelka and drogba - how did they fare? Even the clear cut chances CCC metric is a better metric than this GSBS metric that this illiterate put up there. The CCC metric shows us that Torres scores only 25% of clear cut chances whilst guys like Demba Ba score 60% or so. Other strikers score more CCCs percentage than Torres still. Yet someone keep telling us to measure only Torres clear cut chances.rooney's stats on that is 24%, van persie is 23% any more excuses? dr ibime? Dayo, this coogar guy is slooooow don't mind him. Do you remember his infamous argument that the value of a fraction reduces when the denominator reduces? Since that day, I never pay attention to any statistical argument the doofus makes, Primary school students have better grasp of arithmetic than that twerp.the adipose tissues finally wrapped itself around your brain-cells - you are singlehandedly the most idiotic obese charlatan this thread has ever produced! why is chelsea so far behind in the attack department than all the other clubs in the division? you want to blame it on 4-4-2 when stoke, sunderland, etc all use lone strikers! |
dayokanu: You are a liar and a saphead.. What did I say? You are a bloody oafthis dude is a bloody oaf! he doesn't even know the difference between the goals scored by chelsea team as a whole and the goals scored only by chelsea strikers - english language is a problem for this pleb - i reiterate, tottenham's strikers have scored more goals than chelsea's strikers in the last 4 seasons! in case you have lost the ability to count, the score is tottenham 113-94 chelsea! |
dayokanu: When Chelsea scored over 100 goals their striker Didier Drogba scored 29 of those goals despite being away for Nations cup for 4 weekstopping the chart twice is a one-off and a smaller class size! the stats above have shown you the number of goals chelsea's strikers have scored in the last 4 seasons(which included the drogb's goal crazy season and anelka season) in comparison to the other strikers in the league and chelsea fell way short by their own high standards! you are looking at one off individual achievements - i am looking @ the whole chelsea strike force as a whole! |
dayokanu: A team is not creating chances but they are breaking scoring records dayokanu: In those last 4 seasons a Chelsea striker has topped the goal scoring chartsit's a fact you are notoriously obtuse - who said anything about chelsea not creating chances - we are saying they don't create enough for their strikers. when chelsea scored 100 goals, how many of those goals were scored by the strikers in comparison to their midfielders? shouldn't that tell you the system in chelsea don't play to the strength of the strikers or are you genetically rêtarded? the fact that the attack department @ chelsea struggles is a tradition - even before torres joined so its rather morönic to expect torres to score in the same capacity as the rooney, demba ba, van persie, tevez, etc! you know the attack @ chelsea is shyte when tottenham strikers have scored more goals in the last 4 seasons... |
dayokanu: Are you suffering from Amnesia? You brought the concept of pure and impure goals I have given you list of strikers who have scored more goals than Torres, Now kindly sieve them for the impure goals.you are very thick - that torres is even scoring at all is a testament to his brilliance especially when he is playing for a team that creates little for the strikers to feed on! this was why i said seiving pure and impure goals is irrelevant! chelsea as a team create nothing in comparison to relegating teams! look at the stats and digest yourself! This same Chelsea broke the EPL record scoring over 100goals a season So how can a team who broke this record be accused of not creating chances? What are they scoring from?what a pubic louse! i was expecting you to come up with this useless point again but guess what, chelsea still came last when the stats was tabulated for the last 4 seasons. which means even when torres was not @ chelsea, the strikers starved to death! behold: https://www.eplindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/4-seasons-gs-percentages.png i love making dayokanu look like a piss-stained, alcohol-sodden pleb! pay attention to the stats - chelsea still came last in a stat that included shitty teams like wolves, blackburn and southampton! you still want to blame torres when he's only been here for 1.5 seasons out of the last 4? And for those asking How many Chelsea strikers aside Didier Drogba has scored more than 20 goals Is that the reason Why 50m Fernandud Torres has a awesome 17 goals in 78 appearances playing as a striker?if the team is creating enough for the strikers, torres would have scored far more than that! i have provided the stats for last season and the total stats in the last 4 seasons(including the record breaking chelsea season), chelsea still fell short!!! dayokanu, pull your nostrils wide so i can piss into them! |
Iranoladun: Hi,do car boot sales! get a good DJ and a van, drive to UNILAG law faculty, tell your DJ to start spinning nice naija tunes as you display your unwanted goods....you should sell everything you have within 3-5 hours provided they are affordable! |
[quote author=Sisi_Kill]Choi! The oil on all their faces is enough to fry Akara for 1000 people for the next 6 month. Seriously, what did they do. . bathe in it? [/quote]comot jor - why are you acting like you dunno naija is humid! that's not oil - it's a film of sweat! i won't be surprised if there was no light where the party was held! |
chic2pimp: Can hardly say that I am shocked considering Drogba is the only 20 League goal a season chelsea striker in the Roman era.which means if chelsea sign david villa, zlatan, mario gomez or even messi - they would not fare better than torres cos the team is notoriously useless in creating for their strikers!! anyone asking fernando torres to break that norm now must be a cretin!! chelsea have always had problems with playing to the strengths of their strikers! the statistics is shocking! 16.92% when united and city are all on 50+%? the next time anyone criticises torres on this thread, i would piss in his nostrils! |
dayokanu: Are these the impure goals scored by other strikers this season?who's talking about impure goals? that ship has sailed! that's the stat of the total league goals scored by each club and the ones scored by the strikers in each club! chelsea recorded the lowest! you know there's a problem when teams like blackburn, stoke, west ham, etc utilise their strikers better than chelsea! so what do you have to say or you cannot read statistics? you are dyslexic? of the 93 league goals scored by man city, 54 of them were scored by their strikers - do you get it now or you need a four figure table to understand? |
dayokanu: I have given you a list of strikers who have scored more than him you are the one who brought pure and impure goals. I dont knw what a pure goal or impure goal is. So the task is for you to identify which of the goals are pure or dilutedyou are a disgrace to all football pundits on this section and it's baffling that you can plumb new depths of idiocy in your witchhunting business! it's far idiotic to compare torres to the strikers in the other clubs! chelsea are notoriously useless when it comes to creating chances for their strikers! we have highlighted this in the past with the low number of clear cut chances chelsea make in comparison to the other clubs in the top six! the stat below shows the ratio of goals scored by strikers to the total goals and surprise surprise - chelsea came last! they had didier drogba and torres in the team this time last season! can you see the numbers? how stüpid do you look now? ![]() https://www.eplindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2011-2012-gs-percentages.png |
StarBoard: Not so sure i agree with you completely.the southampton slip can happen to anyone - that cross shouldn't have been allowed to float in either. had evra not slipped, it would have taken a magnificent save from lindegaard to prevent a goal cos the scorer there woulda outjumped evra anyways! it was poor defending from where the cross came from! Even if you put two left wingers in front of him, the dolt will bomb further than the two combined and start jogging back like he was in a marathon.he has aged considerably in the last few years - our tactical approach is also culpable! we leave a lot to evra on that left flank! he patrols it singlehandedly offensively and defensively and at his age, we are asking a lot from him! by the way coogar, i'd take a shitty Rooney on his worst day.rooney's bottom level is the worst in the whole squad! on rooney's day he can be as devastating as messi/ronaldo but on his worst days, rooney would make you go hypertensive. simple tasks like trapping a ball and making a 2 yard pass become difficult! you won't see such in nani, evra, rio, anderson or even young rafael! |
nateevs: @Ibime.jokes aside - nateevs is the most intelligent poster on this thread........ibime is just a putrid obese charlatan who dickrides lampard without shame! mikel is the best chelsea defensive player! without him in that chelsea team, chelsea would be 12th on the table! lampard should make way for ramirez - a double pivot of ramirez and mikel is good enough, let the 4 players ahead of them worry about the creativity! there are enough talents there to supply torres the ammo to score goals! dayokanu: In the league alone Torres has 3 goals in 530mins.dayo, you are the head witchhunter - the onus is on you to prove nando torres is crap! stop wasting bandwidth - come up with the stats already and stop pussyfooting! |
dayokanu: Torres doesnt get good chances vs the Danish club, he doesnt get good chances vs any team, the one vs one he got he missed it.you are talking rubbish - no other chelsea player has scored more than torres! if his problem is missing chances then someone else should be doing the scoring @ chelsea! the best way to judge torres is to compare "pure goals"(goals from open play) between him and the strikers in the other clubs! so mr dayokanu(the head witchhunter) please get to work! |
mbulela: Evra is a shame to the captain arm band.make una leave evra alone jare - i know he can be a Arrow but we don't offer him any sorta protection as well. all the united players who we put ahead of evra all live drifting inside and leaving evra exposed. young, welbeck, nani, rooney, giggs! none of these guys stretches the play or stay on the touchline(like valencia) so it's a massive task for evra not to make errors! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 (of 1148 pages)

^^ I wanted to say the same thing.


