pro01:
determines what to accept and what to refuse based ENTIRELY on her selfish interests and motives.

pro01: Lol. Thanks Coogar, but I no get power to dey respond point-for-point again, as e be say them no get point at all.

Let's just say Debosky is a 'real man'. . .the kind of man that 'typical' naija women LOVE to cuckold marry. To each his own.

PStylish:

I'm glad you could not refute my post.

PStylish: Are you now insinuating that a man's personal decision to stay faithful to his wife automatically stops:

1. Randy men from approaching his wife or vice versa?

PStylish: 2. His wife from giving in to them or vice versa?

PStylish: 3. His wife from getting pregnant for him(randy man)?

PStylish: 4. His wife from keeping the true paternity of the child from both husband and lover thereby allowing her husband to sire a bastard?

PStylish: Man is a free moral agent. My personal decision and values do not bind on any other person including my wife.

PStylish: Who told you all the men siring bastards were at some point unfaithful to their wives or have kids outside?

PStylish: In most cases, it is the good men who suffer this woe.

PStylish: Hence, you can't excuse a woman bringing home a bastard on the grounds that men are generally or mostly unfaithful.

PStylish: Its like punishing one man for the sin of others.

PStylish: Even then, a woman should be (hu)man enough to disclose the true paternity of her children whether her husband is faithful or not.

PStylish: Its the beginning of restitution which has to take place for her sins and guilt to be forgiven and wiped off.

dayokanu: ^^ I wanted to say the same thing.

Thats Debos way of catching all the babes on this forum. Debo alone has cancelled over a thousand on this forum alone

He is just trying to get into another pant again and I strongly suspect this time its coogars hearthrob tpia

Is there a better revenge than nailing your rivals fiancee?

dayokanu: Promiscuous?

I only knew of PSylish or did she do anyone else?

coogar:

she did david and pataki ............on the same night!

naturalwaves:
What's d meaning of this? He gave U a very good point that no man will knowingly let go of his biological child to be fathered by anoda one unlike d women who hide such things for years and this is d best U could come up with. My dear, say something else okay?
Moreover, wen did women turn into dummy variables that any man can just do watever he likes with them without permission. D more U try 2 defend women, the more U make women look like FO0LS that just open their legs 4 any Tom,Dk and Harry.Just stop it okay? Going by ur argument, that's ow they'll contract HIV and other related STDs too cos their own duty is just 2 open. Are women as fo0lish and dumb as U trying to portray? I don't think so. It will shock U to know that most of d so called women knowingly breed d bastards in some cases atleast they could prevent such pregnancies.
Concerning d issue of being faithful, it is impossible 4 everyone to do that but it is still feasible 2 prevent d rearing of bastards in which d women are basically d determinant.

dayokanu:

At the same time? Yeepa mogbe. Tope shey na true?

Same entrance (front) or different (front and rear)?

dayokanu: A man asks a Bank for a loan, The bank gives the loan. A default happens.

Who do we blame, the man who asked, or the bank who did their due diligence and granted the loan

PStylish:

kini mo se? otitokoro o.

Sincerely, would you like you dad, uncle, brother or son to sire a bastard under any circumstance whatsoever?

How would you feel if you realized one of your siblings is a bastard? Would you blame your father for having flings(or even children outside) or your mum for being so heartless?

Please let's be fair and objective.

ileobatojo:

The asker, on the other hand, is asking ENTIRELY based on his selfless and altruistic interests and motives.

tpia@:
^put a sock in it- nobody really cares about your s.tupid opinion.

you talk crap 99% of the time anyway.


i guess you experienced trauma from your female relatives which has indelibly stamped your memory beyond repair.

just go and be gaay somewhere else and stop disturbing us all the time with senseless jargon.

yes, now you can run to mukina and tell her to make you a mod.

oponu jatijati, almajiri.

tapstylish:

Chei.

Trying to convince and make you see reason is not as easy as I thought.

It's becoming an uphill struggle albeit insurmountable task as time goes by cos your mind is made up.

Kudos to coogar for engaging you this far.
I'll now leave him to continue the dirty job.

But remember o, you have a dad,uncles,brothers and maybe sons.

I've heard so much about the arguing prowess of kobojunkie. Are you kobojunkie?

You are coming around as greater (worse) than kobojunkie when it comes to sustaining a blind argument.

PS: Why are women always bent on sustaining an argument even in the face overwhelming facts and evidence that sweep their position and its basis off the ground while still holding on to it tenaciously?

pro01:

Lol. It's always convenient to lose sight of 'context' and play clever by half, innit? Those that have followed the context of the argument would know better. The asker's interest or motive is irrelevant; afterall, men often do not claim to be saints; the problem is with deceitful women who pretend to be virtuous only to later show their true colours. The real issue here is that some of you imply that women are clueless and passive victims who always accept merely because they were asked. That is a disgusting and deceitful point of view because we all know that women weigh their options carefully before accepting, irrespective of the asker's interest or motive. Absolving them for accepting and putting the blame on men merely for asking is therefore as stooopid as it gets. You could as well absolve rapists and instead blame women for dressing seductively.

Then again, it is not my style to go into circular arguments with people who choose to be clever by half, so I'd leave it at that.

You could as well absolve rapists and instead blame women for dressing seductively.

PStylish:

I hate woman wrappers like you from the bottom of my heart.

If I were raised by a strange person as you allege, I won't be here pleading the cause of men siring other men's children and putting the blame largely on the woman who knew better but hid the truth from both men.
Bastards rarely hate their foster dads or mums on eventual realisation of their status.The mum's tears alongside daft but emotional excuses always come her rescue.

If I were raised by a strange person, I'll rather be on the side of women who perpetrate this evil (based on the very foolish and weak sentiment that men mostly cheat and initiate the process and so should be held responsible for the existence of bastards) since I am a supposed 'beneficiary' which is exactly what you are doing?

Now, will I be wrong if I called you a bastard?

pro01:

You frustrated, forlorn old witch, what are you doing here? You should know there's no hope of finding a husband here if you can't find one in real life. Take your decaying ass to Jesus, for He alone can love you the way you are.

pro01: Let's just say Debosky is a 'real man'. . .the kind of man that 'typical' naija women LOVE to cuckold marry. To each his own.

Anyways, every normal man with street exposure and experience would laugh off the argument that the fault lies with men simply because they 'ask' in the first place. LOL. Many guys (especially in the struggling phase) have lost count of how many times they have asked, and how many times they have been refused. . .just because they had nothing 'tangible' to offer. We all know that simply asking is never enough. This begs the question. What does it take for women to 'accept'? Their SELFISH interest, that's what.

Based on this fact, it's silly to blame the 'asker' whose asking is irrelevant - since the 'accepter' carefully weighs her options and determines what to accept and what to refuse based ENTIRELY on her selfish interests and motives.

Blaming men for the 'terrible crime' of asking is similar to blaming someone for initiating litigation for whatever reason: the ultimate power lies with the 'hearer' of the case - to accept or refuse the prayer(s) of the litigant. If merely suing someone to court guarantees a favourable judgement, then. . . . . . .there would be no one left to sue. Lol.

pro01:

You frustrated, forlorn old witch, what are you doing here? You should know there's no hope of finding a husband here if you can't find one in real life. Take your decaying ass to Jesus, for He alone can love you the way you are.

tpia@:
^ more name dropping?

dayokanu: This show of love between coogar and tpia sha.

The envy of all Our 21st century Romeo and Juliet

Efemena_xy: Lol!!
Verily, verily I say unto thou...coogar, you're nuts!!

tpia@:
more like attention w.hore.