₦airaland Forum

ell77: @ Coogar - thanks.
The idea is to not replicate what is already out there, if you read my initial post you would see the logic behind this. If you want single women go clubbing or to the pub I am sure you will have a great supply you don't need this as an avenue, thanks for visiting the thread anyway.

nigerian women don't come to the pubs - they are too bogged down by their jobs and other issues to afford such luxuries! then again, most of them see clubbing as an evil vice so you rarely see the mature women in the clubs! your concept is interesting and would bring more to the yard than pub/club....

But besides drinking and watching football in the pub what else do you do there that is meaningful and how has this helped you? Spend some more time considering da da da ... [size=18pt]"the brother club"[/size].

you know men are not as uptight as women - i have met many people in the pub and we were able to talk business, exchange ideas or do some sorta link-ups! it's not only about drinking and unwinding.......

dayokanu: I watched the first half on replay last night and in the 43rd mins DUD missed a 1 vs 1 chance laid for him on a plate by Oscar I think

van persie misses one on ones on a regular basis - the chances have to be plenty! i have told you even the most prolific strikers in the epl have a goal conversion rate of 25%! thank feck uefa have included a new stat "good chances" for this season. lets count the number of "good chances" chelsea made to torres last night and see how badly he's done!

[quote author=tpia@]yes, he does.[/quote]https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lm0eb0aYsV1qdlkgg.gif

[quote author=Efemena_xy]^^ Go away Coogar.
Don't tarnish a good thing jor [/quote]efemena, don't queer this pitch for me - abeg! this is a rare opportunity to meet buff nigerian women in the uk!

ell77: I know you are being cheeky but I will answer the question you should have asked:

lmao @ cheeky

Are men and single mothers invited?

Sorry membership is for women only including single mothers too - but there will be many events inviting husbands/fiances, friends and kids its just the group itself that is for women. I think a male brother group on its own would be good though - go start one in your locality (no cults please ).

so your association does not include men and single women? good luck on that then! we don't need a male brother group - men do that on a weekly basis @ the various local pubs when football is on the tube!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Good. Looks like we've finally got some common ground here. Disappointment! [/quote]mutual feeling!

Nothing crap about it. It's the right thing to do - especially as you've been more concerned with the child knowing it's true paternity. If the lady dilly-dallies with owning up to her misdeeds, then YOU as the er...MAN...should take the bull by the horns and do the right thing.

i am in a contract with mrs b.....as far as i am concerned, mr b is irrelevant. mrs b is the sheisty one in 2 different contracts with me and mr b!

You've given me a crappy excuse for high-tailing. Pls, coogar - break it down to A, B, C level and explain to me why you shouldn't fight for your child. Your blood. The er... fruit of your loins!

there are other ways to fight for my child without being confrontational!

**Desperately trying hard not to laugh here!!**

don't choke on your cappuccino!

I think we've had this discussion about male contraceptives before. Why must you wait for the woman to take the first step? What stops you from putting a raincoat over it? And if you feel that having a raincoat dulls the er...sensation, then why not go for the snipe + contraceptive injection?? That way, you'll be doing humanity and the society a whole lot of good by firing blank shots!

putting a raincoat over it is not effective too - condoms do burst and a woman desperate to have a baby by me would have her way by all possible means! these days, women go after the used condoms and inseminate themselves!

And yes, extramarital affairs are acts of cowardice, otherwise why all the cloak-and-dagger secrecy??

now - you are talking!
if the deed was never to let the oblivious husband in the know from the onset then why should he know after shyte hits the fan?

Unwillingness to take responsibility for your adult actions, cowardice, irresponsibly allowing another man raise your child...what more??

this should be directed to the woman! she's the last line of defence! even if my swimmers manage to find their way into her - there are measures she could have made to prevent conception! even after conception, there are several measures she could have made before the baby is born! it's on her - not me! the baby is in her belly, not mine! i am not a supernatural being like efe - i have no control of what is not in my belly!


[quote author=tpia@]Are you referring to coogar?
why would you use such words for someone who despises you?[/quote]awwwwwww - tpia@ is jealous i'm in love with efe!

can the men join this group? a lot of uk based nigerian women in the 25-45 age group are bored and they need some sorta companionship! what do you say?

oh yeah - are single mothers allowed too?

[quote author=Efemena_xy]I can't believe I missed this bit of your incredible post! Tut tut! Coogar, I'm disappointed![/quote]oh please - you have been disappointing me since the last 3 months - i can't be heartbroken you are disappointed in me!

I've always held you in high esteem and respect. Especially as an Alpha male who stands his ground. So what's with this display of cowardice I see here from you??

efe, cut the crap! mr b and i have never met before! how would it sound if i knock his door to say his newly born is mine? who does that? there are other ways to kick a man that is down.

You do know that what you've just churned out up there portrays you as a person who can't man up to his deeds?? So basically, you've got the guts to whip out your JT and do the nasty with Mr B's wife, and father a child with her...but you run 4-40 at the prospect of telling Mr B that he's raising up your "bastard" child??

man up my deeds? which manning up?
this is a secret affair - the husband was not meant to know - impregnating mrs b was never in the plan! if its about manning up, i should be poking mrs b on her matrimonial bed under the watchful eyes of her husband! there's nothing like manning up if i am boning another man's wife. using your logic, extramarital affair is cowardice altogether otherwise it should be made public!

You made the affairs of the B-family yours, the minute you decided to bed and breed with Mrs B!

shágging a woman does not have to result to breeding with her! she should have been cautious! the sole aim of having the affair in the first place was to seek pleasure - not raising a family! that she got preggers is a breach of our agreement - let her take care of her f@ckup!

Yeah, yeah, and I'm the queen of Sheba. Next!

queen amina describes you aptly! lmao

nateevs: Hehehe. . . I see Dayo is changing his mind too.
This Ibimitis is spreading fast.

na serious ibimitis!

BlueDiva: Not treated like a star and you buy all those players just to help him?
Why is he shying away from penalties? Who's fault? Even Romeu now takes penalties when dud is on the field.

manager's instruction!

He needs to grow some balls and take responsibility.
The guy is a weakling and should be told to go join Malouda in playing for the reserves.

bluediva - you need blood tonic!

dayokanu: 4 goals for the sole striker at a league leading club is a disgrace

how's it a disgrace? you keep mentioning sole striker - but torres is not treated like a star @ chelsea! add the awoof penalty kicks other chelsea players have taken to torres' tally and you would see he has not fared badly compared to his counterparts in the other clubs!

Ivynwa: @Topic

Even DNA testings can be flawed too. Machines and humans are liable to mistakes. There ain't any perfection. If you expect me to believe that the result of every DNA expert is accurate then you gotta be kidding me.

with 99.9999% accuracy, you are clutching @ straws!

dayokanu: Torres missed two 1 vs 1 chances and you are yarning rubbish

Chelsea FC in the league + CL + Carling cup have a total of 23 goals their 50m striker score 4 of those. A shame, a disgrace a foccking disgrace

If Van persie was giving that kind of output would he be reverred at man Utd

who has scored more than torres @ chelsea?

StarBoard: Everybody knows at some point in the game Evra is going to get caught out of position (and his jogging back was after being left for dead was actually funny to me), but Evans' remedying the situation was criminal.
Not only was he slow to cover but he was also ball-watching and forgot he had a man behind him.The pass made him look foolish.
I've given up on the sod.If Fergie let Piqué go because of this guy then it means he has been losing it slowly since 2008.How come you're not willing to give Vidic the same benefit of the doubt when he came back from a more serious injury after being sidelined for 5 months, but you are ready to excuse a younger Evans who got injured at the tail-end of last season?

that was evra's fault - he should be dealing with his marker much better!
stop the source of the cross - i remember my coach was always particular about that bit in my college days. the moment you allow crosses in, then expect trouble! strikers would always be sharper to the ball than the defenders cos the defenders are running towards their own goal!

jonny evans did quite well - he made some telling blocks and interceptions! evra was the iscariot on the flank! he is good going forward but rubbish when tracking back! he doesn't even run again to rectify his mistakes - he just jogs back like he can't be bothered! i think buttner should start against newcastle!

debosky: Not just a goal - his tenacity led to the freekick for Luiz' goal, and his tireless running set up Oscar for Ramires' tap in.

2 weeks ago,

dayokanu: Mikel lost the ball fine. before the pass was threaded to Quagriella, It took like 5-10secs. Who was supposed to be putting the Juve players under Pressure? Surely your attackers.

This goal is an summary of the liability Torres has become to Chelsea.

How did Drogba do it getting even to his own box to make tackles if he was just putting hand on waist posing like Someone on the runway at MISS UNIVERSE contest.

tonight, dayo said this :

dayokanu: Pikin fail dem say he get fine handwriting.

Hustle? is Torres a yahoo boy wey dey hustle?

So Torres is paid 50m to Hustle ni? for 50 Naira you would get Agbero at Obalende to hustle for you and save 49.999m Pounds

seriously, i dunno who is more idiotic between ibime and dayokanu...

dayokanu: Pikin fail dem say he get fine handwriting.

So Torres is paid 50m to Hustle ni? for 50 Naira you would get Agbero to hustle for you and save 49.999m Pounds

the last time, you said his lack of hustling led to juve's equaliser - he hustled tonight and this led to a chelsea goal and you still have the gall to criticise torres? dayokanu, you are a legendary disgrace with your comments! it's like torres gives you erëctions!

dayokanu: Market no sweet o

At least no Gomez to blame it on this time around

mandzukic is rubbish!

evans just got back from injury - he is not too sharp but he would get better as time wears on! evra was the culprit of the goal we conceded! he shoulda been tighter to the crosser of the ball!

another cleverson victory.....that old gum-chewing manager would play scholes/giggs again in the weekend against the barcodes and we would get another shitty performance!

chaircover: LOL debrief I am lost o! who has said otherwise on this thread?

ronkebp!
any man that is unfortunate to cop an erëction is irresponsible in her book! left to her, a man's erēction should be an off/on switch in the bedroom!

maclatunji: You know them, those who cry and make noise for no good reason and refuse to be pacified.

babies are generally selfish and they are excellent attention seekers! one of the parents must be a gaddafi while the other one is mother theresa! babies would naturally take the piss with the softer parent but act accordingly when they see the toughie! that's how to handle them! all my nephews/nieces don't mess around when i am around but they like me the most! when my toughie antics don't work, i simply bribe them!

BlueDiva: With two holding midfielders, Mikel sitting deep, Ramires can move forward to press. Ramires is faster on the ball.
In a counter attack situation, Ramires has the stamina and pace to run back and support the defence.

In other words, going forward or tracking back, Ramires is faster and fitter than Lamps.
A few games already and we have seen the benefit.

Again, Lamps is a CAM and his first instinct is to attack and he keeps moving forward.
Lamps is not a holding midfielder and there isn't really any sense playing him there when there are natural holding midfielders on the team.

There isn't any sense playing at all when we have young, creative and talented midfielders in the team.
The days of Lamps are truly over. Time to ship him out.

Lamps will always feature though because the English will make a meal of it if he is benched permanently.
RDM will have so much pressure that he will have no choice than to keep playing Lamps.

bluediva, i am about to start a football academy in lagos - can you be my manager? name your price and i would match it! your analysis on the lampard issue is so on point!

debosky: Ibime's an alright chap. . . his problem is his inability to own up to mistakes and a tendency for ridiculous revisionism to suit his current views.

ibime is an alright chap? i hope you are aware ibime is the fat charlatan in the "go compare" advert!

https://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_liqgbeELn41qdy1vy.jpg

she has to be a victim of a crocodile attack - no human being can survive deep gashes like that from a machete!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]No. This thread has shown that it's the man who carries the bigger risk. The man throwing his seed around, sowing his wild oats risks having another man raise his own child. The risk here coogar, is to the unsuspecting man who is tricked into raising another man's seeds. So just remember that as long as you're okay to take what doesn't belong to you, some other slimy, slippery guy would also willingly dip his joystick into what belongs to you. Into your wife's honey pot.[/quote]except that a man cannot get pregnant, go through labour pains, lactate and all other stuff giving birth to a child entails!

Sorry, I don't do football so that analogy of yours has little impact on me.

The way I see it, the woman in question here's getting the best of two worlds. She gets to bed Randy Mr Poor (predator) and passes off his child to Impotent Mr Rich (prey). Now how's that for the analogy of predator and prey?

getting the best of both worlds - same as pröstitutes! lol

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Really?
And a man (whether married or not), shouldn't know that it's wrong to "ask" a married woman to bed him?[/quote]it's the woman that carries the bigger risk should something go wrong - she's the one that ought to be more careful. men don't get pregnant, women do!

If you see nothing wrong with asking, then you should also see nothing wrong with your woman giving it out!

predators and preys!
a predator is never criticised for killing its prey - a prey gets criticised for getting poached by the predator! another analogy is a striker and a goalkeeper! the striker earns his stripes for the number of goals he scores - a goalkeeper earns his stripes from the number of shots he saves! men would always ask and women are tasked to ward them off - if a woman lets in one, it's her fault for being silly!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]And why should a guy ask in the first place?

The same way you (coogar) "ask" to sleep with another man's wife, is the same way that other man would "ask" to sleep with your wife too!

So stop shouting foul.[/quote]why would a man ask in the first place? because he knows some women are gullible! do you accept everything people ask you to do? people would bring all sort of offers to your doorstep, it's then up to you to separate the wheat from the chaff! if a married woman does not know she has to say no to the advances of other men then something is wrong somewhere!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Ha! On the contrary, you're the one being naive here, not me.[/quote]prove it!

How many of you men have claimed on this thread that the difference between a man siring a child outside and a woman siring one outside too; is that at the end of the day, the child in question from the cheating man knows his father? You lot have also claimed that in this circumstance, all the man needs to do is tell wifey that he "mistakenly" had a child outside for another woman.

this is a different circumstance but i would still apply it! if i know for sure i am the father of mrs b's child then it's left to mrs b to confess to her husband what she's done! what's ma business in the affairs of the B-family? i only know mrs b, i have never met with mr b ever before! let mrs b sort the issue out with her husband!

So tell me this, how does this cheating husband know that he's sired a child outside? So you'd better apply that analogy to the question you've asked me. Stop acting holier than thou by placing yourself in Mr B's shoes. Do Mr A for a change biko.

i cannot do mr a! i don't sleep with married women contrary to what you think but I can hold brief for men like mr a! they can cook up whatever mouthwatering offer that is a available but it's still down to the woman to accept or reject - women hold the key to any séxual congress except rapé!

You know something? I laugh in Chinese here! You men are the cause of your own problems, and yet you all love to play the victim.
Now isn't that rich??

a man is the cause of his wife sleeping with the houseboy? just when i thought i have seen it all!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]If Mr A gets Mrs B pregnant, Mr A should do the right thing and tell Mr B that he is responsible for Mrs B's pregnancy. That way, Mr B is fully aware of the baby's paternity and would not be accused of raising another man's child in ignorance. NOW THAT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO!!

But do all you guys shouting foul here, do that? You're all placing yourself in Mr B's shoes. Why not place yourself in Mr A's shoes for a change??

Bunch of hypocrites![/quote]don't be naive
how would mr a know for sure who owns the pregnancy? the two of them(mr a and mr b) are shâgging mrs b at the same time. only mrs b can say for sure who owns the baby and sometimes these women don't even let mr a know about the baby for fear of being blackmailed! only a woman can tell the real father of her baby - mr a is in the dark as much as mr b!

debosky: The man holds the key - literally. If he doesn't insert his key, no sêxual congress. The man also often has the tools of coercion - money, grades, jobs, etc. which often lead to women doing things they otherwise wouldn't do. If the holders of power also act nobly, there will be fewer of these congresses as well.

nah - a woman can resist any sëxual advances unless you are trying to say women are generally stüpid and would do anything they are asked regardless of the immorality. a guy asks and a woman says no - can there be anything after that? tools of coercion my arśe - who hasn't been coerced into doing something silly? if we all fall prey into such - all of us would be drug dealers, bank robbers, hired assassins! there's no excuse for a woman(especially marrried women) to be caught doing such! you also forget more often than not, it's these married women who go after the men abi what kinda coercion tools has okon the houseboy that madam is spreading it for him?

debosky: ^^ You dey mind them?

If other men aren't interested in random shagging, how will the women get preggers in the first place?

In most (but not all) cases, men still initiate the sexual contact - if you eliminate that part, most of the problem is already dealt with.

what a daft thing to say?
are these women räped before they get impregnated? a woman cannot learn to shut her legs and resist any philandering man on her trail? sometimes i think your moral compass is so screwed up, i marvel at how you find your way to church every sunday! only a woman holds the key to any sêxual congress - if she says no, that's it - end of story!

BlueDiva: Why is nobody talking about Romeu?
Mikel/Romeu pairing should be something.

Ramires is more effective playing on the right of midfield.
Still,i would prefer Ramires to Lamps at that holding role anyday.

If i remember rightly, that was the role he played for Brazil at the last world cup.

bluediva, you really prefer ramirez to lampard? please explain ....

[quote author=tpia@]ok, all these males with loose joysticks who run around impregnating women, should post their sob stories on a different thread.[/quote]tpia, shut your mouth n be sensible for once - were the women impregnated and inseminated @ knife point? the issue here is the deceit and not the sex drive of the parties involved!

ronkebp: ^^^^^^do i know for you men!!!!lets assume they are both pretty and s/e@xy, abi there are no pretty and s@ex/y chics ni?

there are but then very rare - and that's even beside the point!
in truth, a man does not even need to visualise a pretty woman to cop an erëction - there are spontaneous erëctions that are constantly reminding men of what nature wants them to do! you cannot understand - just like i can never really understand labour pains!

ronkebp: So you are saying you always have an erection when you see any pretty lady? because if you do, then i know where your answers are coming from.

any pretty lady? is it about pretty lady or the sêxiness in a pretty lady?

SailorXY: @Coogar, i don't really rate Carrick, if any two of Anderson, Cleverley, Fletcher will be in midfield then Scholes will do a better job than Carrick anyday, albeit i dont see why these guys should be starting week in week out ahead of our youth anyway {the major reason Paul Pogba left}, its just not fair. I don't remember Anderson having a bad game this season so far, yet he has been relegated to the bench after our third game or so. Anderson is known to tire towards the last 15 or so minutes, an impact sub of Scholes or Carrick can be brought in. Giggs *may* only be allowed to feature in the League Cup, as i believe players like Lingard, Tunnicliffe should be allowed to grow. Infact Giggs should be forced into retirement whether he likes it or not! I hope Fergie hands over at the end of this season as well, taking with him his assistants.

i rate carrick's defensive nous.....he doesn't offer much going forward these days but he's the best in a 3-man midfield or a 2-man midfield where his partner is willing to help reduce the overload! scholes is too weak for that these days and cleverson are too attack-minded to really provide a shield for the back four!! the only solution in ma opinion is cleverson - we are not going to keep cleansheets but we would outscore any opponent!