₦airaland Forum

debosky: Nani has scored multiple times against the top 5 sides of last season in the past 3-4 seasons (more than Valencia has done), but StarBoard is just waiting for Nani to start demonstrating consistency.

Waiting for the next definition of consistent.

nani's not consistent has to be the biggest joke on this forum. see bad belle o! they said nani is not consistent, we brought out the stats to prove his consistent productivity! they said stats don't count - errrrrrm, how do you measure productivity without numbers and stats? we let that fly.....so we asked them, name a better winger than nani so we can understand the meaning of "consistency" and nothing has been provided! starboard needs to lie down..........

[quote author=Efemena_xy]You believe everything you see on Youtube?
No. Prove your claim to me with hard facts substantiated with back-up statistical data obtained from reliable research sources.[/quote]scientifically proven 3D pictures showing millions of swimmers heading towards the same finish line. hundreds of thousands get to the destination at the same time and the ovary picks one it wants! emphasis on "picks"!

And how d'you know the scales aren't tipped heavily in favour of one sex?

46 chromosomes - 23 apiece of x and y!

How d'you know that those tadpoles aren't in this instance mostly, or say 90% "X" chromosomes?

equal number, efe!!
you did biology na!

Man wey dey carry incomplete load go begin blame im wife say she nor fit produce "heir". Bunch of hypocrites!

if the load is incomplete then there wouldn't be any fertilisation - another evidence is the moment these men decide to try their luck elsewhere - gbam, a male child would surface!!! so how come is the load incomplete at home but it's complete with a concubine? answers on a postcard, please!!!!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Na useless tutorial be that!
And no, the contradiction is in the first 3 words of your opening statement and the bolded. Additionally, you now claiming that the proven biological process of fertilization is bollocks?[/quote]super-bollocks!
the ovary is like a club bouncer....with many people outside the door trying to go in. the bouncer can only allow one of them in.....then the door opens stylishly for one to go in and then the door slams shut on the others.....it's not about who get there first - go n watch the millions of documentaries on youtube - the door opens for who the ovary chooses....

Those little swimmers (belonging to the man), determine the sex of the child, so don't even go there.

no, they don't - the doorman determines the sex of the child!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Take Coogar for example... [/quote]hahahaha, such a virile man! i'd take it as a compliment!
as if welding job is not a honest profession.....look at you!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Coogar

Your opening statement contradicts with the bolded! You do know that, don't you??

That aside, why must you adopt a male child? You saying your girls aren't good enough?? [/quote]where's the contradiction? because i said if my wife can't make one? you want to preach the old myth that it's the male that carries the x and y chromosomes so the male technically determines the sex of the child? that's bollocks....

the ovary chooses what fertilises it. the theory that the spermhead that wins the race to the ovary fertilises it is false. in actual fact, millions of spermheads get to the ovary at the same time and the ovaries assess what each has got and it carefully chooses what is compatible with it!

how's that for a tutorial, efe?

Sagamite: This is like a Man A that has been having mouth that he would beat Man B to a vegetable state when he sees him.

Then on a Sunday, he sees Man B dressed in his best sunday attire and goes to attack him. A fight ensues and Man A ends up in the gutter, a battered face and in an ambulance heading to hospital. Man B did not even have a single stain on his white trousers and shirt, and heads to his destination. Yet Man A is telling everyone who bothers to hear that he won the fight, that he kicked that morrafuckers arses, he dealt with him. Knowing no one believes him, so he is still spoiling for a fight with Man B. Man B knows he has nothing further to prove, the world knows what happened and there is no denying it.

I am confident I have proven you are a sophist, have lower intellect and have a "I no go gree, you must kill me today" mentality. I am happy to leave it at that.

Are you happy to leave it at that?

a very daft analogy!
this is man a(coogar) saying he would beat man b(sagamite) after school on friday!!! man a has evidence that man b was spewing bollocks eons ago. man b asked him to provide the evidence. man a diligently provided the evidence with a date and man b became keanu reeves in an instant by claiming he was just playing the devil's advocate!!! there's no al pacino here, sagamu boy!!! stop begging, this is already a [color=#000000]r[/color]ape session!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]^^ Kobo, I need to ask you this:

Would you in anyway, whatsoever feel pressurized to have a male child if all your kids are females?

Are you saying that as a man, you won't have that secret longing deep down inside of you to try for a heir? Someone to carry on your name /lineage?

Mind you, from the posts on this thread, many well educated parents fell into this trap - once the step foot on the Nigerian shores.

Be absolutely honest here pls...[/quote]i am educated and i would love to have a male child - if my wife can't make one, i would adopt one in bangkok or timbuktu!!

StarBoard: You're talking of Nani scoring once only against City,Spurs,Chelsea,Arsenal and Liverpool in the League, Carling Cup,FA Cup and maybe Champions League in his 5 seasons at United.Name any of this sides that Nani has scored more than once against. That hardly counts for consistency.So that point is mostly null and void.
Nani's consistency needs to improve in my view.

on the top of my head.....
arsenal(fa cup 2007/8, emirates 2009/10)
chelsea(community shield 09/10, league last season)
man city(community shield 11/12, league 10/11)
liverpool(league 07/08) spurs(league 07/08 league 10/11)
plus countless of assists in those games to boot - he has scored against bayern, barcelona and created goals in big european match-ups - and he's not consistent?

Yeah, they do. That should be a reason for United to anticipate that scenario and raise their game as well.

united did raise their game albeit the last 10 mins of the game and won convincingly!

True, but that assertion is based on an age-long rivalry.
Liverpool don't mind losing to Arsenal (as of now).
I really don't buy that reason.Swansea is a mid-table team at best and for a newly promoted side they should see that game as winnable in a bid to stay up, unless they feel they can't stay up.

this mid-table team called swansea beat the league champions(man city) last season!!
food for thought!

ileobatojo: +1. Their persistence is bordering on psychoses now. See wahala o!

because y'all beloved adonis is getting verbally lashed the thread should be closed? sagamite played a devils advocate when he said the bible was a book of shyte - just because i pointed it out to him that the bible encourages anonymous donors in the church....the dude is battling with mid-life crisis!

Sagamite: Oh, God!

I don't need to waste time with your cretinous arse so you can claim red is black. All the proof is in my last post.

It was obvious right from the beginning when you refused to provide the link that you were being fishy!

You are at a lower intellectual league, accept it!

after telling us ibori is not corrupt? after telling us the court has to find him guilty first? after foolishly telling us he cannot be guilty by association? then you moved to playing the devil's advocate - then you moved to the clusterfuck argument with pro01 as if that affects the price of fish......

sagamite, admit it - your intelligence quotient = the phallus between your legs divided by pi(π )

[quote author=tpia@]look at this decrepit, ugly old toad typing decent? what will one not read on nl!!!!!
is really helping you out here, old frog!!!![/quote]ugly old toad? tpia can actually say someone is ugly? you would fellate on me free of charge if i ask you to - cos i am the type of guy you pray, aspire, dream to have...... however, it's a wishful thinking....i don't crink old hags with buckteeth.

Sagamite: Okay, I will take the delight in gutting your arse by bringing the link myself.

You did not want to bring the link because you know I was playing devil's advocate with the argument to ridicule your moronic, low-intellectual level arguments. Not that I said Ibori was not corrupt. You are a pathetic liar!


I played devil's advocate because you moronically argued that someone cannot under any circumstances be assumed guilty of a crime until they are found guilty in court:

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/5#9470089

So I said based on YOUR moronic assertion, we can then dumbly say Ibori that was on the run and stupendously rich without a notable source must be innocent then (based on your lame arguments).

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/7#9480370

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/7#9480693


I was ridiculing your moronic assertion by applying the faulty logic to Ibori. You said people were not guilty until a court finds them guilty, so since Ibori was yet to be in court, I asked based on your assertion, he must be innocent? You know that, that was why you were chickening out to provide the link. This is how aggressive I get about Ibori's guilt:

https://www.nairaland.com/444610/defence-ibori-maximum-force-uncalled/1#6033001

Look at the dates, it was before (2010) your moronic assertion (2011) I have been saying Ibori is guilty. So you pathetically daft arse can NEVER lie on me that I said Ibori was innocent. That was my beef with pro01, his defence of Ibori, well before playing devil's advocate with your moronic assertion. This was where I warned pro01 not to mess with Deepsight, because Deepsight is at a DIFFERENT level.

https://www.nairaland.com/444610/defence-ibori-maximum-force-uncalled/7#6059851

Despite that beef with pro01, even today when he makes sense, I acknowledge it because, unlike you, I am at the Apex of intellectualism and accept facts, logic and I am objective irrespective of the subject.

https://www.nairaland.com/859170/marriage-worth-it-guys/3#10098384



You were the one that even argued that IBB was not corrupt because he became a billionaire legitimately from his army career until proven guilty in court.

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/6#9471942

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/6#9473083


You are a pathetic liar. Not only do you struggle to accept logic, you resort to sophism shamelessly. Guys in the top 2 tiers will never be like that. They have enough confidence in their intellect and ability to provide facts, logic and onjectivity they would never resort to sophism intentionally. Go and read my posts or Deepsight's posts and you will never see sophism. Just championic dialectics.

When I say, you are not at the top intellectual levels, it was not an insult. It was a pure fact!

https://www.nairaland.com/791491/nigerias-millionaire-preachers-documentary-shown/6#9472034

As I said, this are the qualities of the smartest people on NL and you surely do not have the qualities. "I no go gree, you must kill me today" rejection of facts, logic and objectivity mixed with sophism is not a sign of high intellect.

God, I love humiliating people. Something is wrong with me.

this boy is a fool!
you were playing a devil's advocate? jesus christ - what a cop out......after arguing without scruples for days that ibori isn't corrupt until a court finds him guilty!

what has your previous argument with pro01 gotta do with this? that you have argued for/against any motion does not count, sagamu boy! stay on the topic and stop moving from post to post.....your stance was ibori was not guilty until he's been found guilty by the court and i told you he was already guilty by association as his relatives had been sentenced already in which ibori was indicted! you went on a marathon of epistles to convince yourself you are a genius.....

surprise surprise, ibori pleaded to money laundering charges( the same charges his relatives got sentenced for) and his corruption charges were dropped because the prosecutors could not prove beyond reasonable doubt he did those things. however, my point still stood that ibori was guilty by association and he got punished for the same offence his associates got punished for!

now you changed it to playing the devil's advocate - may amadioha impregnate you with albino goblins for lying that you played the devil's advocate!!! what fuckin effrontery? were you playing the devils advocate too when you said dr fireman was a corrupt spiritualist? perhaps you are playing a devil's advocate that you are a genius too...


your tactics of long winded epistles to convince your audience can only work for people with short attention span - not with intellectuals. once again, you have been sonned!!!

[quote author=tpia@]^a nauseating pile of worthless crap like you calling someone disgusting? your mama is a joke.[/quote]my momma? this is exactly what i am talking about: you don't interact like someone that was well brought up in a decent family unit. talking about mothers, do you have one?

why dont you get some desperate old cargo to marry you, then you can talk about single!!!!

i know you get on heat for me but....no thanks! you are too old to be considered! it's the equivalent of obsanjo aspiring to play for real madrid!!!

[quote author=tpia@]is that proving too difficult, cougar?[/quote]no, madam tpia(nairaland's oldest hag)!!!
i met professor makanjuola recently in a seminar and he confirmed you were his student in 1983. i don't want to belabour the obvious but jeeeez, you are one old coon!

4llerbuntu: Truth is with their new phones, what do you envisage to be the innovation that will stand them out?


sure their present products are nice, but this is a company for whom the last two product releases had retina display and Siri, facebook and twitter integration as the "innovations"


To change the form factor to make it bigger has a lot of issues within their ecosystem. apps, screen res etc.
to put a bigger battery is also iffy, see above.
LTE etc are already covered by the competition

therefore its quite understandable that they go after the competition, at least now they acknowledge that there is competition.

the comparative advantage they used to have over things like apps, battery life, hardware, looks have been eroded. unless the iphone 5 will give blowjobs on demand, when its released, pple wil look at it, and at options like SGS3 and decide.

personally its a no-brainer. lets wait and see sha

this is apple we are talking about - when iphone 5 comes out later in the month the galaxy s-3 would look crap like the iphone 4s murdered galaxy s-2. its a no brainer - samsung can't compete, they can only copy!!!

Sagamite: Chop fcking chop, provide the link.
There is something fishy that is why you are refusing to provide the link.
You can bother to quote it but cannot bother to provide the link?

this is daftness per excellence - so you mean you need a link to identify your own comments? until i provide the link, the comment belongs to tpia, kobojunkie or becomerich? sagamite is caught in a quicksand and the more he struggles, the more he sinks!

You know I can go and get it myself and then use it to bash you and show you are not a credible personality to be worthy of being tagged an intellectual?

that's exactly what i want you to do, doofus! i have provided the comments and the date you made that comment. if you google any sentence in that comment, it should take you to the link.....sagamite, i want your death to be slow and painful so i ain't rushing - i love to watch a man wince as he shakes hand with death!

Do the most honourable thing and bring the link yourself and save a little face before the humiliation.
We are about to add sophistry to your lower intellectual skill set.
You are not in my league. Pure fact!
Come on! Chop fcking chop!

of course, i am not in your league - with your below average intelligence, i am intellectually out of your league. you cannot even recognise your own comments barely a year ago even after i clued you up on the date the comments were made. sagamu boy is low on memory chips - i would let this drag and drag until you bow to me - your god of math and science!

Sagamite: Chop fcking chop, provide the link.

There is a reason you first ignored my request for proof yesterday night. You knew you were about to be humiliated and ran.

Then your moronic ego would not allow you to stay down, so you came back this morning thinking you can bluff to save face.

You did not know I am Paxman's first cousin and I would still maintain you provide proof and would not take a bluff.

Then you daftly tried to omit the link because it is like providing the final nail for your own coffin. Fishy behaviour!

Your moronic ego got you into this. You "I no go gree, you must kill me today" attitude got you into this mess.

Coogar, chop fcking chop, provide the link. Be a big boy!

Don't be scared. It would hurt but will not kill you.

Link please.

this is pathetic!
sagamite cannot even recognise his comments - this is no longer selective amnesia - you are what the shrinks would call an autistic savant!!! sagamite has been caught and he's wriggling to break free with the last litre of honour left in him. you have been handed the clues and yet the sagamu super-genius cannot find his own comments! i don't want you to die quickly - lemme delay your death so your admirers can see you are a pseud!

he would waste @ chelsea - chelsea's midfield won't work as hard with their lethargic and insipid brand of football!

Sagamite: ROFLMAO!!!

Provide the link to the quote.

There is something stopping you from providing the link.

Something smells fishy!

[Looks to the skies] O God, thank you for my superior intellect o. I know how to use it to humiliate people!

Coogar, chop-fcking-chop, provide the link for your quote.

Don't be scared.

look at this lazy-arse twerp, i have done half of the job for you - go to your previous comments and fish the link out - you are a super genius - ain't you? you want to be spoon-fed, do i look like your babymommas dotted around the boroughs of london?

sagamite, you mean you cannot even identify your own comments? someone get this charlatan his steroids! lemme give you another clue - you made these daft comments on the 4th of november, 2011!

now get to work.....

chamotex: Did Southampton play Swansea or Wigan?

wigan or swansea or tp mazembe - same difference, chamotex!

Sagamite: You made an accusation, now back it up.
Such approaches (proofing) are what highly intellectual people take.
We are waiting.

For your sake, I hope this would not end up being the proof you have disorientated amnesia.
Come on, coogar, you can do it.
Don't let us wait too long.

one of sagamite's periodic brainfarts....

Sagamite: Cretin!
So why take him to court then? Why waste public resources for a trial, just lock him up since he is guilty before being proven guilty, according to your daft arse?

Since when did arrest equate to conviction in courts? Foooool!!!!
What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? That has turned to "guilty by association" and "guilty before being proven guilty"? Psychotic CRETIN!

So in your daft world, people are convicted and legally guilty before a trial? Or the are guilty just because they know someone guilty of a crime even when the person is saying they were not involved? Show me where Ibori has been convicted for looting Delta States?

I wait for your hard evidence that Ibori has been convicted of looting Delta State before you concluded he was guilty! Mooooron!

hahahahahahaha - lemme guess, your alter-ego wrote that or was it your twin?
sagamite getting sliced with a scalpel like the perfection of a surgeon performing a thoracic incision!!! only a charlatan like yourself would believe ibori has to complete a trial before he can be found guilty.....don't i just love to make you look like a cretinous vermin?

Sagamite: Okay, if you insist. Let me humour myself just a tiny lil bit.
Show me where I said Ibori was not corrupt.

Lets see if it is selective amnesia or the same disorientated amnesia you had when you said I never said "change your desire".
Go ahead, show us.

you want me to do your job for you? hahahaha - hire a dog, mate!!!

your selective amnesia has kicked in finally - you said ibori is not corrupt until he's tried and found guilty! 3 weeks later, ibori pleaded guilty without trial! - what made it hilarious was the fact that you compared ibori to babangida(a man who has never been arrested or declared wanted by the INTERPOL). sagamu boy, i have been sonning you before eve became adam's mistress!

[quote author=tpia@]^only a b.astard reasons like you.

remain in the gutter, f.ool.[/quote]and how would you know if you are not a [color=#000000]b[/color]astard yourself? you need to work on yourself. your attitudinal nature is so disgusting, it pretty explains why you are still single @ 48!

StarBoard: Story.
Let him prove it to me against tougher opposition. I'm the one who wants to be convinced so I set the criteria by which I judge him and believe me I'm not the only one who feels this way. For crying out loud,how many of those Southampton fellas had any prior EPL experience before the start of this season?

nani has consistently scored against tough oppositions ever since he joined man utd in 2008. in fact, he plays better against tough opponents than the easy ones. in his first season with us, chelsea were the only big team he didn't score against! so what's your point that he needs to prove you wrong?

A game in which our tactical gambit allowed Southampton to play to their strength doesn't give them any credibility in my view. That they led City at the Etihad doesn't count as well.They lost that game, which is all that matters in the end, as they did yesterday.
If we had our manager do a half-decent team selection,Southampton wouldn't have had a chance.

it was always going to be a difficult game. teams like this raise their games against the big guns. they were playing the biggest club in the land on their home turf so i expected a tough game. mid-table teams would easily go to the britannia and win there easily but the big clubs would have their work cut out to win there because tony pulis would set a different strategy for the big teams....that's the way it is!

Did you see how Swansea silenced them a week ago at the same St. Mary's stadium?Why didn't they give them (the Swans) the same run for their money noting how they caused a scare at the Etihad?

they didn't consider swansea a threat! against us, they raised their game - played like its a world cup final! by the 75th minute, they were zapped and they stopped pressing which allowed scholes to pick those passes! watch how liverpool would do the same to us when we go to anfield! arsenal won there fairly easily but united would need all the luck in this world to beat liverpool 2-0 cos the scousers would raise their game against us!

StarBoard: Rio Ferdinand and Antonio Valencia each had an assist despite playing mostly rubbish.So I dont get your logic.
Nani played well tbh but I'm not convinced.
Lets see him do it more consistently over a stretch of games and against better quality opposition then I'll change my one.

you must learn to raise your hands up sometimes.....
valencia/rio had an assist each but they had 90 mins to get those chances. nani came on, he set up the van persie chance that led to the penalty and also got the assist for van persie's winner @ the death, all done in less than 30 mins! we didn't have any balance in the team until nani/scholes came on!

then the weak opposition excuse does not count too.....this same southampton led city 2-1 @ the etihad for a long period before city managed to win the match. if southampton can match city pound for pound on city's turf, what makes them a weak opposition to man utd? it is only when united play some certain teams that we deem those teams as weak....southampton are a very good hardworking side and they would give many big teams a run for their money!

montelik: I hope this new found accountability will applied to other as well. I would expect Evra to be given some bench warming time soonest considering DDG made one mistake, while Patrice averages at least 3 or 4 a game but is bailed by the other defenders or DDG himself. No sacred cows.

welbeck gave evra no protection at all.....fergie was daft starting welbeck in this game, it's pathetic to watch as welbeck kept drifting into the centre of the pitch leaving evra super-exposed!

[quote author=Efemena_xy]Sure, she carries the pregnancy for 9 months. But what stops her from walking away as soon as the baby's born? They aren't tied at the hip are they??[/quote]that is if the man hasn't left her already the moment she misses her period....

[quote author=Efemena_xy]So what are you implying here? That it's okay for the man to wash his hands of his responsibilities?

And who says the women are always left holding the baby? Haven't you heard of women abandoning their kids with the father? Haven't you heard of single fathers?

Whether you like it or not, the fact remains that for a child to be conceived, the male must play his part. A woman can't conceive a baby on her own.[/quote]but it's the woman that would carry this baby for 9 months while the man can simply walk away from the drama.....in that wise, women should take more responsibility......if only both parties can get pregnant, then you have a point........

Sagamite: Stop grasping at straws!
I argued Ibori was not guilty?
Really? Lol
There is really no need to read the rest of the rubbish when the beginning is full of rubbish.

selective amnesia is your biggest ailment! you mean you don't remember arguing with me james ibori isn't corrupt? feck's sake!

I have seen some lay people say we are comparable. That is laughable.
I just see you at best as a "poor man's Sagamite".

comparable to your god? sagamite, you are not as smart as my toenail - dickwaving isnt my hobby so i'll let you bask in the limelight. an empty barrell makes the......

chamotex: Fergie is a stubborn goat.
We are the only team in Europe without a natural DM in the whole squad.

i really don't think we were crap today cos of the lack of a defensive midfielder - none of the goals conceded could have been prevented by tiote/dembele or even yaya toure. I think the problem is more a general laziness of the team. we don't press at all. we let opponents stroll to the centre of the pitch before we offer any resistance to disrupt their flow!

the players still have this slight delusion that vidic/rio/carrick are what they used to be 3-4 years ago....the rest of the team tend to leave so much for the defence to do. evra/rafael are fantastic going forward but not so great at defending! they play like wingers and when we don't have the ball, they take forever to fall back into position! our biggest problem is our organisation when we don't have the ball - its horribly substandard!

StarBoard: @coogar,
Anderson is hardly fit enough to perform at a consistent level.
Plus you said they don't offer much defensively.So even if they were paired together and Anderson by some miracle stays fit, the problem is only half-solved.

they don't offer much defensively but we would have scored more than a goal in the first half! the final score could be 8-5.....or 13-8! one thing is certain, the ando-clev axis has not failed yet to give us a victory!

https://i.minus.com/ibmLVcZNa7hyxP.gif

https://i.minus.com/iblcuIDZH52gCd.gif

ritchboy: 89 coulda been 99, who knows?

it coulda been 59 as well with him in the team, who knows?
this was his skysports interview: "We were a bit lucky with the 2-2 and the dramatic end. I have to say a big thank you to Paul Scholes. When he came on, every single pass he hit was the right one. With him you are always on your toes. For me, he was the man of the match."

Hernandez will need the holy ghost to score that goal against Fulham

and hernandez would have scored the ones van persie missed as well.....

piers morgan guzzling his vomitus as usual....

https://i45.tinypic.com/x3wqx.png

ritchboy: They said he'll "add nothing", now he's suddenly "worth every penny paid"

if we didnt buy van persie, somebody else would be doing the scoring, don't you think? it could have been berbatov, chicharito or even rooney! we didn't need him to score 89 league goals last season