₦airaland Forum

dayokanu: Bayern uber allez.

Now we have matched Juventus for number of final losses. 5 CL final losses 4 wins, what a shame

This loss is on our strikers Robbery and Gomez.

I doubt this generation of German players would ever win anything

How many final and Semi losses in the last 10yrs

Detailed report when i get on computer

Now is time to get drunk

Congrats Chelsea. Bayern uber allez

this generation is just useless. they are only good
when they wear the white shirt of the german national team.
other than that, they are toothless.

bayern had all the advantage. i doubt they would have a better
chance to win the competition ever again. damn, for gomez to
have scored that many in spite of the number of chances he
misses? the credits must go to robben n ribery!

nateevs: Away from the game being a spectacle or not. Please share your moments at points during the game.

When Schweini lost his pen. . . I just kept screaming I can't believe we are going to win it.
I grabbed my fellow Chelsea fan screaming we are going to win it. I cannot believe it.

And I watched as Drogba sent the keeper the wrong way, I had never screamed that much in my life.
I was trembling. I had to calm myself down. . .

Glorious night.

the positive for me was mikel obi's discipline.
he was a beast! he won all his tackles. sprayed the balls here and there
and he constituted a nuisance to bayern munich.

ashley cole is a ball magnet....couldn't count the number of blocks
he made. di matteo's plan worked to the t. brought on torres when
bayern took the lead. bayern took out muller after taking the lead.

congrats chelsea, you did england proud!

proudly9ja: Wait for dudu

BTW..Chelsea don win Champion's league o...

it means arsenal would play qualifying games next season.
defending champions carry more weight than 3rd position.

what a leap! from chelsea's 6th position, they have
leapfrogged arsenal and tottenham. tottenham slips to europa league
and arsenal drops to 4th position(qualifying games)

mukina2: congrats cheksli !

mukina2, where is your husband now?
had bayern won tonight we would have seen torrrrrrrrrrr, torrrrrrrrrr, torrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

mukina2, produce your husband before i come into your
bedroom and flog the 2 of you with dyabman's panties!

[quote author=StarBoard][/quote]english finalists
2005--liverpool
2006--arsenal
2007--liverpool
2008--man utd, chelsea
2009--man utd
2010--
2011--man utd
2012--chelsea.

and english league is weak?
upon all the money barca and real madrid spent this season, it
was england's chelsea that carried the day.

StarBoard: An undermanned English side comes to Fortress Allianz and beats almighty Bayern Munich.
Then dayokanu comes to English side threads and drops all his semen yearning dust about German sides.
I mentioned Robben was over-rated.Now we've seen Arjen mess himself p and drive his rep into the ground further.
Congrats to Chelsea.
German football like dayokanu is over-rated.

chelsea are 6th in the premier league! sixth! sixth!!

went to bayern's den and won big there. it's unthinkable!
mikel obi shat on bayern's midfielders.
i hope di matteo keeps this job. he deserves to be there for 10 yrs.

maybe this would release the purse of roman abramovic and shell £200m this summer.

english league is weak? uhhhhhhhhhhhh?

debosky: Congrats Chelski - well deserved victory.

the first london club to win in elite europe.
arsene wenger should bow his head in shame.

bayern munich are the most useless team on the planet.

--playing at home
--played a 6th placed team in the premier league
--didn't capitalize on mata's error
--penalty shootout - probably the first german side to lose a penalty.

dayokanu, your team took a helluva beating!

[quote author=biker-boy]Were is the bald headed man and his goal. Robbish!!![/quote]you are a dork!
tb joshua said he saw a bald-headed player scoring against chelsea
he then said chelsea needed prayers to avert this mishap.

if robben hasn't scored then tb joshua's prayers have been answered.
not that i believe tb joshua but there's vagueness in his prediction
and it can be twisted to suit any outcome.

man of the match: mikel obi!

ritchboy: What makes the likes of Fletcher, Cleverly, Pogba etc better than Fellaini other than the fact they play for Manchester United?

fellaini is shyte abeg.....he would be anonymous in man utd.
his quality suits everton. there's no pressure to do well at everton.
if he has to play in a club where the pressure to win all games is immense,
fellaini would fade. just ask charlie adam!

mykali: we shall be victors...

it's all over sissi the oracle has chosen bayern as the winner!

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/18/article-2146291-132893CA000005DC-809_634x422.jpg

dayokanu: I bet its in your own interest to marry someone from a similar background
Not someone used to having 200 maids take care of her in a mansion when she was young nor someone who thinks marriage to you is a way out of poverty

dayo, there's room for courtship/relationship before the marriage, isn't it?
that's enough time to smooth the rough edges. if she's untrainable, drop her and find another.
similar background is rubbish. what's the fun in that? a man should put himself in a position
to operate above his station or below his league.

options options options. the more options you have, the more likely you would find the gem
if you limit yourself to a cocoon, trust me - you won't go far.
marriage is a life contract. i am not limiting myself to one yeye group only to realize later
when i am 3 yrs into my marriage.

dayokanu: Funny enough those marriages last longer than the so called marry for love. In marriage you learn to Like and adjust to your partners.

adjust? fucck that!!!!

Most of our grandparent didnt even meet their spouses till a few days till marriage, Even till now, A succesful man goes to his village and handpicks they prettiest girl he sees. and they learn to "love" (Which means adjust and accomodate).

they lack the exposure then and that was dictated by the culture and the society.
hell, they used middle men. women were virgins and would wait till the wedding night.
things have changed now. with more options came more problems.

All those marry for love are those that have 13 divorces over the course of a lifetime. Check how many times Kim Kardashian has loved in her 30yrs of existence
I think marriage goes beyond the emotion called love.

you call what she's got love? come on!
that she said so doesn't mean that's what she feels.

Similar background, values and social status are what i would consider more important than love which is transient, A Graduate marries a graduate, Middle class family marry one another, villager marry Villager, IBB son marry Adenuga daughter

cinderella wouldn't have found her prince if he applied the same method.
come on - let people be free to choose which class to marry from. why should
i be restricted to a particular class, race, age group, etc? i am marrying for
me not for the entertainment of some family folks.

armyofone: Cougar

choi! shebi the guy already promised to pay, or did you miss that part?

he could be bragging. if he wanted to pay, he would
have sent the money already. international fee is not
beans!

well, i hate shaving my pretty hairy leg

wait till you become esau and you would love shaving.

dayokanu: Of all women in the world its probaly only African American women who dont look at your class before marriage and this is directly linked to the social status of the men.

Many are in jail, a lot dont go to college, A few of the correct ones marry outside their race so the women options are very limited Thats why they do that. If you notice the way AA women usually hate when a black dude marries a non black

yes, the race card they often wave to every issue comes into play.
if a white player tackles a black player, trust the aa woman to shout racism!

Caucasians women mostly marry people on their same social level and not only Nigerians marry for social status I think indians are worse

same poverty mentality i was talking about! what's the difference between india and nigeria?
the slums of mumbai make ajegunle looks like malibu.

Many of them don't even make their own choices, their families make it for them, Before a guy can be approved, His caste, family history social status and most importantly bank accounts are scrutinized, they pointedly tell you to send your bank statements for verification of assets.

same as nigerians. na poverty mentality!
they don't want to join issues with the dregs of the society so it's imperative
for them to know which caste and the social history of the groom. civilization
refused to flush that part out of their system.

My colleagues at work Indians, The concept of marrying for love is actually strange to them, When i told them we Nigerians mostly choose our wives and marry on our will they were stunned. Like 3 of my Indians colleagues now have sent their parents on search mission for their partners.
So where is the love in this situation?

shaking ma head. the cultural difference is shocking.
i cannot for the life of me understand how grown men would leave the issue of
marriage to their parents but then - such is life!

armyofone: you might want to talk to your student advisor and international student office.
continue to persuade your guy to pay the debt.
research banks, interest rate is high but possible to get a loan.

try everything possible before you make that decision to go back.
stay well and strong.

bloody scrounger!

continue to persuade the guy to pay? i bet if the roles
were reversed, you would say the guy is a loser.

armyofone, i pray you wake up as a full grown man tomorrow.
a 2-inch slinky between your legs and hairy chest to boot!

dayokanu: That scenario when that woman shaggs her houseboy is just a show of her desires for physical fulfilment
Why dont they consummate such relationships and turn it to marriage?

afraid of what the society would think. nigeria is a crazy place. the moment
they see a well to do woman running after someone who seems to be her microcosm,
the tongue goes hyper. it must be because the woman is using his seeds to prosper her business.
in other words, such relationships only thrive in the under-g mode!

And dont get it twisted A lot of women dont attach any affection or maybe develop the affections later on
They look at how your profile matches the dream man they want and start from there. I'm sure Sade would say she loves Okoya now

do they? a woman in her early 20s has such options to chop n change!
as she grows older, the options are limited and it soon turns into "anything goes".

And Tell me how many women love Paddy Adenuga compared to A broke jobless guy of similar build to Paddy
All those I love you in most cases na wash

broaden your horizon for a second and leave the naija scenery out of it.
you don't see well-to-do caucasian females marrying men out of her own league?
all those babes who go to africa to marry mgbeke african men are what?
in the past 18 months, do you know the number of african american women(less than 30)
that have flown to naija to find their missing rib? what are those men offering them
apart from their rugged john thomases?

dayo, leave story. na only naija women dey look levels. that poverty mentality has eaten deep into their marrows.

dayokanu: Screwing doesnt equate to love.

50 men queue in front of an Ashi joint to screw one girl , Would you say they love her?

Many guys and men screw their housegirls and I dont think they love them

Love is supposed to result in marriage abi? How many of these execs marry their houseboys, gatemen and gardener Since this "love" is supposed to conquer all

Human beings look more for compatibility and convenience

women attach emotions to sex than men.
most women would not screw who they don't love or have any sorta affection for.
for whores, it's different. the reward is the money they earn from it.

in a nutshell, a woman is capable of loving who she screws, not so for men!

dayokanu: The concept of love is even an illusion

If you know the number of girls loving Paddy Adenuga after seeing him on ovation and knowing how much he is worth

The time I start seeing a female Bank MD loving and marrying a roadside mechanic then I would agree to the romatic concept of love wantintin

A man would love a woman with big bumper and attack and not one with beard and leg muscle

love is not an illusion. i have known top executives who date men who are 2 or 3
tiers below them because of his sexual prowess. don't big women screw their
houseboys, gatemen, gardeners, etc?

ifyalways: Love is sometimes over rated.People miss out on goodies because they are waiting for some prince charming to come sweep them off their feet and "they live happily everafter" story. . .
We know there is a fine difference between reality and fiction.Don't expect the "love spark" to remain and renew itself especially after tying the knots,you've got to keep working on it.You've decided to stay you said?Get off the WWW and go talk with your hubby.Unburden your heart to him,listen to his own part of the marriage burden and together u both would find a starting point again.

love is not overrated, people just have a daft conception about it.
"i must marry ifyalways cos she sponsored me through school". "i must marry
nkiru cos she loves me"

the question is do i love her? the fact that she's done favours for me or loves
me does not mean i must love her back. matter of fact, it's the chic that gives
me a hard time that i actually love.

when nigerians stop marrying cos they are loved, the world would be a better place!

contact tumababa!

[quote author=tpia@]oh, the lady said she has already "done the do"?

i don talk am say na im bodi dey hot am "lojiji" maybe after seeing photos or "testimonies" recently on nl.


anyway, k"Oloun ma fiso e so wa.

forgot to add dayokanu to the list of names anyway.[/quote]na malaria fever?

tolugar: HELP[color=#990000][/color]HELP my ipnone 4 is locked. how can i unlock it.
ASAP

locked to which network?

[quote author=ms.anon]i'm sorry if i'm posting this in the wrong section but i'm not exactly sure what category my post falls under. the moderator can move this to the appropriate thread. all i need is honest advice.i'm in my early twenties and a student abroad. prior to my leaving Nigeria, my sponsor promised me Heaven and Earth. i never had any cause to doubt him as he's family and really close to me, not to mention he could afford to pay my way through school abroad.. or so i thought. shortly after i left, he stopped picking my calls and at one point told me not to call him again. i later learnt he had fight with my dad, who is his brother. he took it out on me. i'm yet to hear from him. I've had to move out of my apartment, squatting with a friend at the moment, broke. i was a student in one of the federal universities in Nigeria until said uncle pulled me out because he felt the incessant strikes and system of education wasn't too good. i'm now faced with a dilemma. do i go back to Nigeria, where's there's nothing left for me? where i have to start the long, tedious jamb, post UME journey or do i stay here? hoping it'll get better? that somehow, i'll hear from my uncle? as it is, i owe my school what amounts to 1.2 million naira, give or take. my boyfriend back home wants to pay that AND have me back home by Christmas for a formal introduction. i'm not sure i want to get married now. i love him but i feel it'll hold me back, that getting married to him will slow me down. how do i combine school with a long distance marriage? on the other hand, there's a way out with him.
what do i do? what do you guys think? i think my problems are 2. school wahala and relationship wahala. i would really appreciate hearing your vews. please. i'm sure it'll go a long way. thanks.[/quote]suspend your academics for a year and find a job!
you would save enough in one year if you're prudent.
your boyfriend can take a chill pill for now....if he's so
itchy' let him get himself a visa to visit you.

good luck!

[quote author=tpia@]did the poster see someone she fancies on nl, or why all the story at this point in time?

maybe you saw sezkillz photo, or maybe coogar, denzel2008, richklintz, pennywise, maclatunji, seun, lefulefu, 2buff, reality, or any other male here, and suddenly your bodi dey hot you and "you cant bear it no more", abi.


pardon me - what exactly are nlers supposed to do for you, or is this another fake thread, as i suspect.

better accept Jesus into your life, whoever you are.[/quote]tpia is not the same if she doesn't mention my name in a week.
instead of you to peruse what the poster is saying and not fall into the
same pit, you are busy pretending to be a nafdac agent who separates what
is real from what is fake.........

dbisiback: Yes i am holding on to my marriage i am not leaving, we have 2 beautiful kids. I just need to know if anyone knows where i can buy love.

He is good looking, everyone likes him, he is generally an ok person. Though he has hurt me in the past but to be fair he is not the worst man. He is not violent as well. He provides the little he can i help out as well.

My only problem is i do not love my husband, we have been married for over a decade i have tried and tried and tried as much as i can but i just cant find any emotion however small for him. Something happened shortly before we got married and i found that the love i had for him grew wings and flew away but stupidly believe i could grow the love back with time but after 12 years i still cant find it.

Sxxx is a challenge for us we do it for marital obligation not for pleasure infact i never for once enjoy it with him, its sad, its killing i wish i enjoy it like every other woman but as much as i try i cant find any emotion. We dont kiss i find it disgusting, dont hug it makes no meaning to me, we dont make love it irritates me we do however manage to have sxxx

I feel nothing, absolutely nothing for him, we relate as friends not husband/wife. He has tried his best he has resigned himself to fate, i have as well but sometimes its killing to live this way. I feel for him i really do no man should live like this. He never consider leaving, i do at times but i cant, i am not.

Where on earth can i buy love?

love will find you.....that's all i can say!
keep doing what you do or probably you guys need a change of scene.
a vacation for you two in a remote island might work and if all else
fails, hire a marriage counsellor(debosky)!

chic2pimp: If your brain actually stopped to think for a moment without it's usual farts you would have noticed I knowledged Carrick as the best passer of the lot.
The stasts clearly shows Mikel to be hardest of the lot to dribble whilst not forgetting he also has the highest completion rate.
I repeat if he was that effective, the Midfield position of Man united won't be it's weakest spot and y'all also won't be searching all and sundry for a quality Midfielder.

the midfield position of man utd is at it's weakest point because
no one has been able to partner michael carrick since scholes got old.
giggs is not a midfielder, anderson is often injured same as cleverley
and fletcher had a stomach problem that ruled him out all season.

the only constant factor in the united midfield since 06/07 is carrick.
you can check his number of appearances since then to see he's been the most
played united midfielder. having a partner who is as fit as him has been the
problem - nothing to do with angel michael. as you can see, your brain grows fungi!

Oh yeah like they've done several times for club and country right?
Let England put Carrick as their defensive midfielder without any player covering his behind and watch teams walk right through them.
Or better still replace Carrick with Mikel vs Barcelona and watch him get slaughtered.

carrick is a defensive midfielder. he does not need any player behind him to function.
the problem has always been who partners him. when fergie used anderson and fletcher
ahead of carrick, united bossed teams everywhere they played in europe until fletcher
copped a red card that left a vacuum in the final in rome. giggs filled that role and united were slaughtered.

last season, it was carrick and #cough cough#, giggs again and united got slaughtered!
how is this carrick's fault. he cannot do the job of 2 men in a 2-man midfield. that problem
is a system problem not the component. fergie hasn't realised yet that playing giggs with carrick
in a 2-man midfield won't beat big teams.

No the reason why England have not done well is simply because "THEY ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH"
And neither would England have done any better if they had 3 Michael Carricks marshalling the midfield.

xavi and xabi alonso disagree with you.
you agreed carrick's passing is better and yet you prefer scott parker who would win the
ball and then give it away. how often do you see busquets dive into tackles? his strength
is his reluctance to give the ball away and keep his markers away....if your opponents don't
have the ball, you don't need to tackle them. this is why spain is the best in the world...not
because they have pitbull terriers in their midst....but because they have passers!

And so? Steven Gerrard's finest England performance came in the 5-1 sodomization of Germany in a Worldcup Qualifier not a meaningless friendly.I bet if that was carrick you would have busted a nut already.

gerrard? a fringe player in 2001.
england owed that performance to michael owen and a very dodgy german side.
it had nothing to do with gerrard. owen was still gold then. everything he hit
touched the back of the net.

Anyways if you are looking for a disciplined performance, look no further than Parker's vs Spain. That performance probably solidified his position as England's no 1 defensive midfielder.

despite being rap[i]e[/i]d by carrick at white hart lane this season.
this blogger did a comparison between carrick and parker and this was what he found....

To consolidate this idea, let us analyse Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur against the same opponent: their 2-1 victories against Arsenal.
When United won at the Emirates in January, Carrick played as part of a four-man midfield, in an anchor role that allowed Giggs the freedom to link up with Rooney, dropping into his familiar role at No.10. Parker played a very similar role as part of a four-man midfield in Spurs' October win over Arsenal.
The Stats Zone statistics show us Carrick's high pass success rate (51 out of 56) and his unusually low number of clearances (2), suggesting good ball retention and controlled defensive play.

https://cms.442.haymarketnetwork.com/contentimages/blog/4CvPpass.jpg

What's more, Carrick made more passes and more tackles than any other player on the pitch, although, importantly, he made comparatively few clearances, and fewer than his counterpart Alex Song. United had 51.4% possession at the Emirates, completing 350 passes to Arsenal's 334.

https://cms.442.haymarketnetwork.com/contentimages/blog/6CvPtackle.jpg

Whereas Carrick trumped his fellow midfielders for the number of passes made, the stats show that Parker made fewer passes than five other players including four Arsenal midfielders; indeed, at White Hart Lane Arsenal had 61.7% and completed 415 passes to Tottenham's 227.

https://cms.442.haymarketnetwork.com/contentimages/blog/7Passes.jpg

https://cms.442.haymarketnetwork.com/contentimages/blog/8tack.jpg

Both men attempted two clearances, but Carrick's were inside his own penalty box, suggesting he will only clear the ball and willingly concede possession when there is imminent danger. Parker's clearances, from slightly further forward, may indicate a deficiency in composure. This may appear a subtle difference, but it may just be exposed at international level.

Perhaps more damningly, Opta stats reveal that Parker was tackled more often than Carrick (or for that matter Gareth Barry). The Spurs man was dispossessed 58 times in his 29 league games – twice a game, double the average of Barry (36 times in 34 games) and four times Carrick, who was dispossessed only 15 times in 30 games. With possession of paramount importance, Carrick is simply less likely to lose the ball.

dayokanu: I can say these stadiums have bigger capacities than most English club stadiums aside Man Utd. The final of the whole Europe. Fans wont be cramped into a 40k stadium.

I believe in the future Emirates would host

schalke's stadium and hampden park were 52,000 capacity when they hosted it.
the emirates is bigger than them and even more modern!

dayokanu: Bayern is one of the European heavyweights , Arsenal is not

it's not about the club.....it's about the stadium!
roma(stadio olimpico), aek athens + panathanaikos(olympic stadium), galatasaray(istanbul)and
schalke04 all hosted it just few seasons ago. hampden park(home of queen's park) hosted it in 2002.
i don't see how these teams are better than arsenal in europe.

When you have Beckenbauer, Rummenigge, Gerd Muller and Hoeness making a case for Bayern? Who makes Arsenals case? When their best player in history is still playing for New York redbulls or is it Paddy Viera or Kanu earning their paychheck at city and Pompey or Sylvain Wiltord and Lauren

Even Players like Bergkamp and Overmars have their allegiances to Ajax more than Arsenal

The only eligible club stadium in England is Old Trafford and they can only host so much at Old trafford

it's not the club. it's the stadium as shown above!

dayokanu: Man Utd has hosted less than 10yrs ago,

Arsenal built their stadium few years ago and Arsenal doesnt rank high up in the scheme of things in Europe

Assuming the decide to host at Emirate, the CL trophy would be the first trophy to grace that stadium even though its in transit

allianz was opened barely 7 yrs ago....in that period, arsenal and bayern
have only featured once in the final of elite europe. so what criteria made
them give it to bayern to host?

Whenever they decide to use England its either Wembley or Old trafford
Before 2010, when was the last time Bernabeu hosted? Since 1999, Nou Camp hasnt hosted yet in the last 10yrs England has hosted twice and next yr is even Wembley again

exactly my point!
hosting it in wembley does not benefit any of the big clubs in england.
none of them club football in wembley unlike milan, ac milan, barcelona,
real madrid, bayern munich, etc who would play it in their club stadium if
they get the chance to host it in their respective countries.

dayokanu: The 2003 Champions league final was held in Old trafford.

How many stadiums are above 60,000 in capacity and belong to clubs in England? Thats where the problem lies

E.g in germany Stuutgart, Schalke, Hertha berlin, Dortmund, bayern all play in Stadiums with capacities over 60k, While Liverpool Chelsea and City have stadiums with capacity less than 50,000

Stuttgart would host a CL finals before Any of City, Chelsea or Pool

they should keep hosting it in club stadiums in england, not at wembley!
arsenal have 60,000 capacity stadium, united have 76,000 capacity stadium
why take the stadium to a pitch no football club uses in england - it's a disadvantage!
bayern have all the advantage tomorrow. they own the ball-boys, the announcer, majority of the fans
and they own the pitch(where they have played more than 50 games this season).