₦airaland Forum

[quote author=Kay-Dee]initial gra gra by Wigan go soon end.[/quote]they are super-fit - they played united with verve n aggression the other night.
roberto martinez's players should all face a dope test. the intensity is mad!

wigan on fire. . . . .what a double shock for arsenal!

mukina2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7SoPVDOllk

https://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2012/04/16/article-1334570265586-129E13CB000005DC-179405_636x342.jpg
https://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2012/04/16/article-1334570470201-129DFF43000005DC-69474_466x595.jpg

3-d holographic ish - that's nice.

nigerians should do one for fela & da grin!

chic2pimp: Dude I watched it on T.v whilst also listening to the commentary on Radio(T.v volume turned down) and I along with the Radio dude knew Young dived as soon as he went down. It was as clear as daylight. It's not that the pace makes it difficult for players to stay on their feet, must of them simply choose not to. They've perfected the act of conning refs.

Even Fergie has admitted Young exaggerated the fall. Eventhough he fell short of admitting he dived(but which Manager has ever admitted his players dived?)

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CC8QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mirrorfootball.co.uk%2Fnews%2FManchester-United-Alex-Ferguson-admitted-Ashley-Young-went-looking-for-the-penalty-article891155.html&ei=z0KMT87PLsqw0AXR3rnKCQ&usg=AFQjCNETOje81bOriKxMeSE0fmov6xhdXg&sig2=UNqCD0ZSU1OQktcJ8wryKg

As I said before the contact was minimal to say the least and in no way did it impede Young. He chose to cheat.
Ofcourse He would not have given the decision if it was not a dive. After all Refs never give that kind of decisions, right?

the use of english is your biggest problem then.
diving = no contact at all.
exaggerating a fall = there was contact, but not enough to send him sprawling.

fergie said there was contact and young made the most of it.
the question persists - had young carried on even though there was contact - would the ref had given the penalty?
how many penalties have been given to strikers who don't hit the deck when tackled?

whether contact was minimal or maximal is irrelevant. any contact at all is a foul.
the degree of impact opens up a vast debate. everyone's pain threshold differ from person to person.
in normal play, i can understand why young tripped and if you see the defender's knee - he stuck it out and withdrew it a tad too late.

[img]http://www.abload.de/img/untitled-1h0jan.gif[/img]

rastamouse: Why will anyone drink alcohol, except for medicals reason?

it's medicinal! red wine is medicinal.
in countries with maritime climate, some pastors take cigarettes for warmth!

[quote author=Okija_juju]Jesus turned water into wine for many reasons including; Obedience to his mothers request and secondly keeping the party going.[/quote]so you are saying Jesus colluded with sinners to keep the party going? really?
okija-juju - stop this blasphemy.

everything we do as humans have a limit. if you go beyond the limit, then there's a problem
alcohol if taken with moderation is fine. same as cigarette, same as eating.

Emmysteve: The founder and senior pastor of Christ Embassy, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome on Sunday told all who cared to listen that since the Bible does not expressly condemn both Cigarette and Alcohol, then there is nothing wrong with these stuffs.

It all started when a viewer of his television programme wrote in to enquire from the popular pastor if it was wrong for a 'Christian to work in a Cigarette company'.

Below is the response from Pastor Chris:
There is nothing wrong with Cigarette, the Bible doesn’t say anything was wrong with it... I know a lot of people do complain about it because of the relationship attached to it with some sicknesses like cancer...but if they really believe it is wrong why not ban it totally.

It is the same thing when you have Christians working in the Breweries. The Bible doesn’t condemn alcohol. The only reference made to alcohol in the Bible is ‘do not take too much of wine’. So you see these things has to do with the individual state...if they are convince something is not good they should just ban it..."

What do you think about the Pastor’s position? Share your thoughts.

the pastor is very correct. taking alcohol is not a sin. Jesus' first miracle was turning water into wine.
wine is alcoholic. if wine is posion, Christ wouldn't turn water into wine.
there was no mention of cigarettes in the bible so i cannot comment on that.
the key is moderation. if food is not taken with moderation then it leads to gluttony - which is also a sin.

debosky: Are you dyslexic? I said they don't ALWAYS go back to revisit the incident - that lies within the discretion of the ref. He didn't feel the need to revisit it because the foul (denying the goal scoring opportunity) was ineffective as the goal was scored.

then atkinson is a disgrace. how he gets to manage these high profile games is a mystery.

This would only make sense if ALL offences committed in which the ref allows play to continue get retrospectively punished. We both know that is not the case.

even if it's not the case - bringing down a player in the box shouldn't have been missed.
martin atkinson and chelsea have a long history - he would do everything to let chelsea win.

If Twatkinson gave that phantom goal after complaints, I don't blame Bale for playing on and scoring - Twatkinson might've had another brain fart and book Ade for diving instead of sending Cech off. The ref clearly had a Chelski agenda so Spurs needed to take matters into their own hands.

mata's celebration convinced atkinson. mata was celebrating before tottenham fans complained and the ref acted on mata's celebration.

mbulela: Any one who denies the fact that Ashley Young dived is merely joking.
Look at the way he was stretching his leg to make sure he made contact with the defender.
The painful thing is that when he is truly hacked, the ref will not give him a benefit of doubt.

young did not dive, there was contact. . . .you can argue he exaggerated the foul(debatable too) but to say he dived
is untrue. the defender stuck his foot out and he was too late to withdraw it.

[quote author=Mr_TA]But you went for the money eh? [/quote]he went to get screwed up the arse by [b]arse[/b]ne.

debosky: You cannot revisit it because the goal scoring opportunity was not ultimately denied - the goal was scored. It's simply a case of allowing advantage, and if an advantage is obtained, the ref doesn't necessarily need to revisit the previous incident.

you're a tool for typing this dross!
how many times have referees gone back to book a player retrospectively after waving play on? they point to the incident and wave play on then go back to book
the offender when the ball is out of touch. adebayor had been denied a goal scoring opportunity. whether bale scored from the follow-up was irrelevant. a foul had been committed before the goal. cech should have seen red.

Against Wolves, Rambo was fouled as he was about to take a shot. He got up and took his shot and the ref never pulled things back for the initial foul.

rambo got up and took the shot again. no advantage was lost!
adebayor was fouled, he never got up, someone else scored.
apples n oranges!

That a ref made a daft decision once doesn't make it right. You wouldn't advocate giving goals when the ball didn't cross the line because Twatkinson did would you?

yes he did make a daft decision cos when collina was asked. . . .he said the referee should have allowed the goal to stand and still send off lehmann for denying etoo a goal scoring opportunity.

Besides, there is a difference - in the case of Lehmann, the ref had blown his whistle before the ball was put in the net. It's like a team wanting to play advantage but the ref blows. Technically the ref is correct, although the game would've benefited from playing the advantage. In this case, Twatkinson made the right decision.

he did not.
tottenham did not complain - very naive team. i trust man utd players.
rooney wouldn't have let that slip. adebayor bearing on goal, in control of the ball and was brought down by cech.
it's a red card!

dayokanu: In that situation I blame Bale. He should have stopped play and forced the ref to take the decision. By Bale scoring he pretty much decided it. If I were Bale, I would walk the ball to the goal line and stop play pointing to the ref to take a decision, If he signals play on, i would tap it in.

After Bale scored and jubilated, What would be Cech's offence? Did he stop a goalscoring opportunity even after Bale scored?

cech's offence was denying adebayor a goalscoring opportunity! he clearly fouled adebayor and that incident should have been revisited.
lehmann got a red card in the champions league final against barcelona in a similar incident even though barca had scored from a follow up.

chic2pimp: Granted the second goal should not have stood and Cech perhaps should have been sent off but I somehow still don't see Tottenham winninng. Not with the horrendous form they've shown off late. Also with Drogba in the sort of mood he was in yesterday. There I say it had Toress started yesterday the outcome might have been different.

cech perhaps? that was a blatant red card! end of story.
he prevented a goalscoring opportunity - yes bale still scored from the situation
but the foul should have been revisited. cech should have been sent off. the referee
screwed up mainly because tottenham were too naive to complain.

i trust rooney - he wouldn't even do any follow up. the penalty/sending off was more
important than the goal. chelsea with a man down(petr cech) would have worked in spurs favour
chelsea's reserve goalies are w@nk.

chic2pimp: Are you kidding me? Take a good look at the image you posted again and tell me how that is not a dive?. The contact was minimal to say the least but you'll think he had been shot with the way he went down. Also the way he stretched his left leg was nothing short of a joke. Stonewall penalty?.... More like Cheat.

Atleast Danny had more of a case.

that's the thing. you are taking a look at the image posted but was that the pace at which football is played.
of course, the real play was 5 times faster than that. a player turning with pace impeded would definitely fall.
how many times have we seen goalies trying to take a shot n falling on their arses - were they diving too?
the pace at which football is played these days makes it difficult for players to stand on their feet.

look at the foot of the defender. he brought it out, there was contact.
the law did not say contact had to cause fracture. if the contact impedes the progress of the attacker
then its a foul. a foul in the box is a penalty. the point is - whether ashley young dived or not, it's
a penalty. if he didn't dive, the referee would not give the decision.

chic2pimp: One can only imagine the kind of insults that would have been thrown their way had they lost that match yesterday.

they robbed tottenham.
the 2nd goal did not cross the line and petr cech should have copped a red card for fouling adebayor.
it didn't matter that bale scored. cech should have been sent off retrospectively.

2-1 with 10-man chelsea, spurs would have certainly won.

coogar: gamble of the largest proportion? what other gamble is much more than spending £50m on a striker?
no one is asking chelsea to buy up all the world class players on the planet. just do a reshuffling that plays to the strengths of torres.
torres is a spear-head. play him in a 4-2-3-1 formation.

a creative midfielder with vision like mata or benyaoun(a player you sent on loan) must be behind torres.
lampard for all his talents is too docile to be this kind of player. for all his resourcefulness, lampard is not elusive.
he is not in the same level of nasri, mata, silva, ozil, modric, van der vaart and hleb - lampard is too one dimensional.

then have kalou, anelka, sturridge, malouda, etc to flank this creative midfielder on both sides.
play 2-deep lying midfielders behind this roaming three. . . . .to protect the back four.
chelsea would rise from the ashes if they can do that. the 4-3-3 is not getting the best out of the players at villas-boas disposal.

having mata playing ahead of cashley has also exposed cashley to attacks!

posted this almost 4 months ago.
https://www.nairaland.com/827763/official-chelsea-fan-thread-pride/11#9885842

[quote author=BABE!]Coogar, do you think Okoro Azonto Romeo is capable of mole[i]st[/i]ing a male child? [/quote]fucck knows!
but then looking at his sem[i]e[/i]n-slurping lips and his celebrated celibacy - he's quite capable.
have you heard of what those priests in the monastery do to male kids? link up the pattern and use
your csi - skills.

nateevs: Oh! You can't find back up for ur posts?
That's 3 posts in a row you cannot back up.

nateevs, don't mind the charlatans!
villas-boas made a mistake. . . .not playing mata in the hole like we had highlighted
many moons ago limited chelsea's chances of winning games. mata is dynamite.
i actually rate him more than david silva if played in the hole.

anonymus11: If your male child was molested by ur neighbor's nephew dt u left in his custody what would u do?............ Would u be mad, kill d young man immediately report him to d police or leave vengeance to God?....... Remember ur male child is very bright in school, innocent, naive and ya love him to death................ How would dt young boy get over dt stigma. The molestor claims it is false accusation, why would a kid make such up? .

male child? molested? i would put an end to the life of the culprit.
i would be very happy to spend the rest of my life in jail for such cause.
when the kid grows up, he would appreciate the fact that his dad was there for him.

chic2pimp: So Ashley Young dives again. He is now on a hatrick isn't he? Tbh I was neither shocked nor surprised.

[img]http://www.abload.de/img/untitled-1h0jan.gif[/img]

so young dived or your eyes were deceiving you?
there was contact, the contact impeded the progress of ashley young and yes he made the most of it, but who wouldn't.

against wigan, welbeck was held back - the tool decided to carry on. referee did not give a penalty which might still
cost man utd the title at the end.

defender stuck a leg out. he was too slow to put it back, he caught ashley's foot. ashley went down.
stonewall penalty!

[quote author=Killz.][color=#000030]Stories about BABE and Coogar is what everyone on NL already knows. . . You have to be very dumb not to know that!
Where did i make up stories about Goldieluks? [/color][/quote]what story is this knucklehead talking about? the one about you born a pikin or how you lost your virginity to your dad in a shed?
i thought you had given up on your perpetual s[i]e[/i]men-slurping of peddling rumours that clitorally excite your army of atutupoyoyo nymphos.
killz or fuckever the name your foster parents call you, stop attaching yourself to important people. i dunno you from adam! dogs don't associate with rats!

montelik: We need to up the tempo in the 2nd half, goal difference can't be ignored. That slow cumbersome stuff we were playing in last 15 minutes of the 1st half needs to stop. Villa have a suspect defense and unlike most of our recent opponents, they aren't parking the bus.

danny welbeck is the reason we are not 4 goals up already.
his finishing needs to be retaught. he gets into those nice positions to score but
his composure fails him.

StarBoard: I'm wondering whether we actually deserve to win this title, judging from our signings to our team o ven Fergie's tactics and selection over the course of this season.
Fergie shouldn't be celebrating judging from his treatment of Dimitar Berbatov.

if we beat villa tomorrow, things would look more tantalizing.
city are running out of matches to close down the gap and i am sure united
won't lose at the etihad stadium.

[quote author=Mr_TA]City are putting the pressure on now, Looks like this is going all the way down to the wire.[/quote]we have resuscitated man city. it would have been over if we had beaten wigan.
they rely on our business to thrive. our victory demoralizes them. our loss would motivate them.
mind, we are still in a great position but the margin of error has been trimmed.

the 3 points we pissed away @ wigan should have been reserved for the battle of etihad.
we would still have 5 points cushion even if we lose there but as it is, it would be down to 2 points.
sunderland ain't pushovers. we have to draw/beat city @ the etihad to coast to the title.

fergie brain-farted! fergie's fault.

dayokanu: Well some women on this section are simply impossible.

especially the ones who scream "divorce" at the first sign of trouble.
perpetual home wreckers they are - how can any sane individual advise another woman
to forgo his marriage because of little issues that can be solved?

there are plenty of them here. most of them claim to be married but i doubt it.
no woman living happily in marriage would advise another to leave her husband.
i am not too sure this thread is necessary but some women on this section need
to take a hard look at themselves with their bile. it's pathetic!

lalaboi: No reason i shouldn't qualify!! in both leagues.! Got the much needed win the last game week. Also i got Gat2win fc next who's bottom of the pile. Doesn't look like he's changed his team for weeks but he has aguero as captain. And destroyed Wolfgang kaiser with it . . . Dunno if i should be worried or confident.

be scared!

chic2pimp: Football is a funny old game. Every team has at least one bogey side and Dortmund it seems are Bayern's. I bet if you pit Bayern against Arsenal,they(bayern)8 out of 10 times would come out top. I guess you can see where I am going........

who are milan's bogey team? swansea fc?

Ibime: Strong words from cuckolded eunoch. We shall see mettle tested over the next 14 moons. I shall piss on the ruins of the House of Munoz and hang quote from great philosopher Canibus on the walls of my ludus.

captain amangala must accept his fate. . . . .or be destroyed by it.
miguel munoz does not fear death. he embraces it. caresses it. fuccks it. each gameweek, he slips his c[i]o[/i]ck in the mouth of ibime, and prays to thrust home before the jaws snap shut.

Ibime: Having already sacrificed 4 points just to get 10 players on pitch (which I already have) for next gameweek, you are in no position to talk. Meanwhile Ipukulu Marines is storing up free transfers to deliver fatal blow in week 36 when I intend to split arse with c0ck for the final time.

i pity your life. . . .when the storm comes, you would be swayed so badly your heart would end up on the right side of your chest.

You neither have players on the pitch nor money in the bank to be taken seriously. I would rather turn thought toward Rapid Viagra and Kokomaster who present more formidable challenge due to the fact that they have players on the pitch, transfers to play with; and money to spend.

talk is cheap. you are going down in the next couple of weeks.
you lack the managerial nous to compete in this habitat. you are like alan pardew!

Mark my words, Chigurh FC cannot finish in the top 2.

back to position on gameweek 36 and coast to 38!
ibime, hold firm cos this is a footie tsunami.