...If u raised the dog from puppy...till adult...it can’t forget u Lai Lai......

ststyreal:
Well, i remember an adage that says " birds of the same feathers flocks together". Which one come be your own. Any girl wey dey do wetin i no dey do, i no dey near her sef talk more of making friends with her.
Oga Op, the moment you noticed she is the club type and you no like club things why didn't you end the relationship immediately?
I do advice men, especially my own brothers, never you marry a woman because of her beauty, rather marry her because of her good character, look at her heart and her upbringing.
You see club girl, you go marry, which advice do you need again?.
Well, if you still want to keep your vow, take her for deliverance now abi?
Infact, i am out of advice for you because na you do yourself. But, kindly take care of your kids.
May God almighty come to your aid amennnnn...

Is it not u vagina-people that say body count and being a club girl doesn’t matter....

Widall:
Sentence to death for robbery.....our polithiefians should be sentence to death too.

it's the law.....once u are armed ..death sentence is the outcome....if u must steal...go unarmed or do it like our polititians...

body count doesn't matter....body count doesn't matter...
still...make calculated risk....a sexually responsible lady is a calculated risk....dont mention me..I've used 2 valium tablet

Biglittlelois:



Going by your funny analysis, nature gave humans penis and vagina, nature also gave women womb to carry kids for 9 months, and that's where it stops, taking care of kids, cooking, cleaning, working, was not assigned to any gender, anyone can decide to take up any role comfortable for them, therefore, a woman can be the head of the family, and a man can be a domesticated house husband, correct?

u have a weird arrangment of family and roles in ur head...

why must any body be the head.....are they not both equals? why do u women cry over unimportant things....does the head collect salary for being head..

providing doesn't make u head
neither does cleaning or birthing children makes u beneath a man...
if a man cleans and cooks, doesn't make him beneath...

see..i don't get u...its like u have a problem with domestic work...every home is different....some men do house chores...and some women are bread winners...

so there's no fixed roles on anyone except what nature forced on us.....if u want to carry the head title...go ahead...

Zzor:
The same way nature made men to be providers but recently they all want to cheat nature SMH

U re wrong....Nature ddnt make men providers .nature gave men pen!s..and women vag!nas....
....the. nature gave us equal hands, legs, and eyes....
Financially providing for family is a decision..some people don’t do it...

...if u don’t want to support ur husband in that cause....it’s not by force....my point is....it’s pathetic to make it look like ur sole responsibility should be doing what nature gave u free of charge the ability to do...

can a man say contributing sperm to you should be enough to bring to the table..??

Zzor:
I won't have anything to do with people who don't own a table to begin with.

My comment is not about sharing financial responsibility...that’s ur cup of tea if u feel u don’t have to help your man.....

What’s funny is ...Why do u women always make it look like wateva u do...men forced u to do it....

What do u mean by

I give him sex
I give him kids
I take care of his kids

U are not hired to do these things....u want them...
U want to have sex...both of u are fvcking each other...,u women should stop this....
Sex isn’t a bottle of coke u buy for someone...or boxers u wash....u don’t give people sex like it’s biscuit..

U want the kids too...if u don’t want to take care of them then don’t have have them...making it look like a man forced U/or will be forcing into that state of motherhood is cheap blackmail.......same goes for taking care of them kids...


At the end of the day...nature made u have a womb and vag!na....but the decision to spread ur legs and have kids is urs....don’t make it look like u are doing someone a favour by having sex and kids you yourself wants in the first place.....

..

Etinosa1234:
Pls I want to know whether bride Price is still relevant this days. Some feminist are clamoring for it to be abolished that it entails slavery...

Pls I want to learn from the ogas in the house

Lalasticlala mynd44 Dominique

It’s culture....

It’s not an act of selling the female child off...so feminist should go and sit down somewhere ...although, people accuse the Igbos of this becos their price is high....However, the Igbos belive its a sign of being capable as a man...u want to take care of their daughter .....prove it ..

Infact, some men like the high fees so they can show off...

Yorubas don’t ask for much...I’ve seen a wedding where they ddnt collect a pin....they belive asking for any uncomfortable fees is putting a price tag on their child....which is wrong

all tribes ask for other traditional marriage requirement like fruits, clothes and food etc..

Acme45:
what if the woman in question falsified her age for the man to marry her. Then the man finds out that the woman who he just married is way older than him and was unable to gives him a child. So what you are still saying is that if the man files for divorce he will still pay the woman?

I haven’t said anything about this because this is a new scenario u just fabricated....

But anyways.....allow me to come at u like this...

Mayb u are are thinking becos she lied about her age...then the marriage will be rendered null and void....and the judge will just send her packiging automatically.....
Oga...news flash!!....the marrige is still valid...and she can still get money from you if you want to send her packing ...

See...everything isn’t black and white in court...
Do u know that they prove intent in court? That’s how they determine if a murder case is premeditated or it happened in the heat of passion becos of provocation..... which makes the judge determine if the accused gets a few years or life sentence/ lethal injection depending on the state....

She can simply say she was embarrassed and did it out of love....u can’t prove she hid her age becos of menopause...menopause doesn’t even have a specific number....some women hit menopause before 40, at 40, some by 50, some above 50..
U can’t claim she knew she can’t bear children.
it’s not like she’s 70 years old and lied she 31....??if it was that obvious...then u would have noticed the lie.....

she may have falsified Her age in the past to get a job ...meaning she ddnt do it to deceive u originally...

Did she break any mariatal law becos of the lie??
E.g bigamy, underage marriage....if not.....Oga... u may likely pay ooo if u divorce...

See technically, all u have is that u want divorce becos ur wife’s age makes u uncomfortable...
Oga..I’m not a. Judge oooooh, but u will likely pay....
People find out a lot of things after marriage...

age and past marital(divorced) history is something u should disclose to ur spouse on the grounds of openness and trust...
...but legally....they are immaterial... because they dont render a marriage null.....yes...it can only cause problems and make a man say he doesn’t want to do again..

Babara1994:
I'll be turning 40 next tomorrow, but my fear is that I'm a lady and I have no husband at my age.
I had a couple of failed relationships in the past (I must admit my greed and pride caused it).

I really want to know the age menopause sets in and what signs do I look out for, as I'm already consigned to child adoption later in life. I'm really scared. No insults please.

Just try to be happy nd remain positive ...man or no man...life goes on

Akinpresident:
Hello all

Please what are the necessary things I need to know before buying a dog like German Shepherd?

I'll like to know about it's feeding, caring, training and other necessary info.

Kindly help a brother.

If you have an idea where I can buy the puppy I'll also appreciate.

-Feeding depend on you....but ideally...it’s okay to feed dogs twice a day...morning and evening

-Dogs can eat what u eat at home...but they are canines at the end of the day...if u can get meat and crushed bone, that’s better...

-Vaccinations, vaccinations, vaccination...
U need to protect your dog from disease...
Parvovirus
Rabies

-other injections
Deworming once a month
Tick control...

If u stay in a rented apartment with other tenants... u’ll have to keep ur dog indoors or on ur balcony...that means u have to potty-train...potty training is a bit hard...but if u have time..it’s not rocket science...

TinubuGoQuench:


SHUT UP!
THE OP IS RIGHT

SEE UR MOUTH!
SEX IS NOT FOOD BUT WHEN SAME GIRLS DEMAND FOR MATERIAL THINGS, IT IS ALL GOOD

..Wow..so u want have an opinion in peace....but u want to insult me for having one..Why do want to be unfortunate in life.

atheistandproud:
In my adult life, I have heard "when you come and see my parents, then you'll have it and na you go run sef".

As a young adult, that comment greatly amused me but close to a decade later, I can confidently say that it's one of the greatest scams of the century.

As soon as I hear it, I play cool, delete and block the lady's number on all social media platforms. I am done.

I have seen my fellow dudes who have fallen into that stupid trap and I do not feel pity because before marriage, the handwritings are always on the wall.

Many women treat sex with apathy for a variety of reasons:

1. Society is unfair to them. Women are sl*ts, hoes, loose etc. while it treats their male counterparts with kids gloves.

2. Some were abused or raped and they keep it secret. Asking them for sex brings back the ghosts of those memories but most women rather die with that secret than seek therapy.

3. Frigid. Many are naturally frigid. They don't like sex or intimacy. It's got nothing to do with you. It's just who they are. Don't touch these ones with a long pole.

4. Religion: Some women see sex as a sin. Even in marriage, they'll force the man to do vigil and night prayer when he comes for his marital rights.

5. Wrong orientation about sex: If you are with a lady that has a wrong orientation about sex from a young age, forget it. marriage won't change her. Some feel sex should be rationed, like food. Once a week. Others feel it's only for procreation. The crazy ones weaponize it by getting you hooked and then raise the price.


So if she doesn't like it from the onset, believe her and bounce. If sex is not important to you, stay but don't complain later.

She won't give you sex after you two are married!!!

In fact, it is going to be much worse!

A word they say....

All these story becos someone’s daughter doesn’t want you to be another body count....

U even said...they have the wrong orientation about sex....it’s their opinion...why don’t u try respecting other people’s decisions about their body....

my brother what is the right orientation about sex??

To have it indiscriminately?
To spread those legs as much as possible until the man who will put a ring on it comes??

The point is...we can’t all feel the same way about a matter....besides .sex is not food....so, some people are actually not pretending about being chaste for a while...

yusufu16:
Is it that people are afraid of the book of revelation or Pastors dont want to prepare us for heaven.

Just saying

Is revelations the only book that talks about heaven and hell...is it that u just want to shade pastors or u don’t know this..
.why are u not complaining about songs of Solomon??

No pastor cannot operate beyond the level of word he has...no one knows it all......it’s not a crime not to understanding the entire Bible because revelation about scriptures takes time..

.the book of revelations and Daniel are full of coded informations, many of the infos are symbolic...that’s why many people makes mistakes about timeline and who the Antichrist is

.there’s no point preaching to a congregation about hell or heaven with a book u are yet to have full understanding when u can use use other scriptures.....

Dtruthspeaker:


And here, is the reason why you all are confused, running up and down, in an Attempt to resolve simple problems.

Marriage is Easy, if and only if, the couples Do Good Only to each other.

But this is Not So, for it appears one party is attempting to defraud the other or prevent another from taking a benefit. Or in the case of Liability, Fleeing, from it, while the other pursues so that they may have joint liability.

All these evasions and schemings are Definitely Settled in Natural Law, in their respective places.



Her children are hers' and Wherever they are, She has a Right of Access to her children, No Dispute here for the Op did not raise any issue about the children.

And Neither did the Op say that they have prevented her Access to the children, So leave this children matter. If you are interested in the analysis of the Rights of A Unmarried Mother separated from the father of her children, Raise A thread to that purpose.



Aha, Lawyer, even your courts have settled this one na, "That Nothing shall prevent the children of the deceased from entering into the deceased's estate'

The wahala is that most times the family no go gree until court chook mouth.



This one is settled na, we have already said she can claim for "their' (No be only her get the children, hence instead of her I elected to say "their children" children, whether little or grown.

But it appeared that you were attempting to stretch the fact that she could even claim for herself, that one is a very Big NO, NOT POSSIBLE, IN THIS CASE, UPON THE SAME FACTS!



This is your statement causing contention hereunder!


As stated earlier, it is settled that with children, the woman can make a claim but the objection is on the fact that without Children, it is impossible, coming on the ground that you have said "with or without children her claims are valid"

We state that with children it is valid and without children, it is impossible for her to make any claim. Imagine, play-play girlfriend wey don terminate since 2008 go come get right to come dey drag property of old boyfriend when e die, Nna men, Lauretta Onochie go be president before e happen.

Seriously....I am tired....by the way...stop trying to pull ur holy than thou attitude on me...no one is perfect here....if u are not Jesus ..keep u perfection speech to urself...

I told u to go read the OPs original statement...if u read it well u will see that he raised three different points to nullify the woman's claim even though he already knew and told us this woman had children for their late son...below are the points

1.That the woman isn’t legally married to the man.
2. that she left for some time....

3. to now paint her bad... he added that man was sick in her absence till he died....and she ddnt take care of him...

Why bring up number these points...when he already knew the woman had children for the late man, making her entitled to come back and ask for what is due for her children ...?? It was to make their family’s case of denying the woman and her children strong....

U’ll see that many people were commenting in the first page that there’s no official union, so there’s nothing between them to dissolve...that’s becos people were addressing one of the points he raised( that the union is unimportant because it’s devoid of paper).

That’s why I came in and Addressed his number one point by saying “ ....paper or no paper living with someone for a significant number of years with or without children technically counts as civil union everywhere in the world...”they can’t make the union nonexistent just becos of paper....( that’s not the reason why are claim is valid anyways, but I’ll tell u why I mentioned it below)

I followed up with another statement...that fact that she has a child makes her case even stronger....

U see why I mentioned the first point ....families like that of the OP are wicked....if the woman never had a child, and never left.... they would have still brought up one of the 3 points above to prevent her of having any inheritance
...I.e the marriage is paperless....

Dtruthspeaker:


No quarrel intended here.

Your laws could not escape Expressly Declaring and Stating that you Must Do "Natural Justice, Equity and Good Conscience".



This is a bad statement because Doing Justice compells you to discover and ascertain that, which is True and Solid from that which is a Lie or Falls, sieving that which is Good from that which is Bad.

And this can only be achieved through Proper Analysis!

Any Lawyer who is not willing to do this really has no business in Law, for he condemns himself.



And we are all saying that the Woman herself, has No Right To Claim for herself or her benefit. If she was even the wife, she would not even have to make a claim.

But it is settled that the children do not even have to make a claim to take up their father's property, it is theirs already by Nature and Natural Law!

And the op has not made an issue about the children but About the woman, which is the reason why all comments are directed towards the Rightness or Righteousness of the woman's conduct and her purported case.

See....u are just complicating this issue by playing judge and advocate at the same time....saying it is bad that I ddnt find out why she left is playing holy than thou....no one is perfect..marrige is one of the most complicated situation in the world.....besides there’s a present condition that qualifies her to come back, which is her kids...that superceeds any other reason why she left....if u don’t want to get this simple fact...then we will have to leave this point unresolved so u can play ur fairness/holy attitude...

.

I have seen this case plenty times....becos the she left with her kids, the family of the man Wants to cut her nd her kids off.....
why?
because giving her kids any inheritance automatically means she has gotten something especially when the kids are still young....

.u are the one that’s not getting the OP and the man’s family stand...go and read the the ops first comment in the first page and ask the OP if the kids are grown up enough to claim and manage their father’s inheritance without their mother......

If they are adults..their mum won’t be there in the first place .....


U saying that the woman doesn’t have right by herself is just a desperate attempt to modify the condition on ground....the woman in question cannot be viewed separately becos she has kids... why do u keep bringing up another scenario where she can’t lay claims??

gnss:
. Sir ,You still didn't get this ,It's as simple as ABC ....No one has ever Mentioned she does not have a Claim if she has Children for the Deceased man even if she left for a While and came back on Hearing of the Death of the Man .She can lay Claim through her Children .Why do you keep mixing the whole thing together .What others are saying including me is that a Woman that left a man for several years with No Children does not have the right to come and lay Claim to the deceased man Property on hearing about the News of His Death .The Canadian Issue you are stating even though it Happened does not stand as an Authority or Speaks of Natural Justice and Fairness . You keep saying a Woman who left a man left for a While ,How long is a While ? How do you Justify the time frame a woman that left a man to be a While .Imagine a Woman that left and Abandoned a man for selfish reasons without any intention to get back to the man anymore ,Now she has no Children for the man only for her to rush back once she heard the man is Dead to lay Claims ,saying Oh! I still love the man ,Infact we had just a Little misunderstanding ,I only have to give him a little breathing space so we could sort out Differences ,I never Knew he would die so soonest ... Imagine such woman whom a member of the deceased man knew very well that she has been with another man for several years .Well Lawyers and Judges could have a field of there day in Court .All I know is That A woman with No Children ,That had Abandoned a man for many years is never entitle to Lay claims to a dead man Property just because there was a " Civil Union "

U said this thing ABC...but ur comment is so long and complicated....


You said the Canadian case i mentioned isn’t an Authority and doesn’t Speaks of Natural Justice and Fairness ......

#.did I say it speaks for natural justice and fairness...? Is this topic about God’s judgment? I only mentioned it to tell someone that the institution called marriage is rigged against men, I mentioned that in this thread...so what’s ur point??


U kept talking about Why she left ,How long is a While ? How do you Justify the time frame a woman that left a man to be a While..

#. see.... it’s not my place to analyze the circumstances surrounding the marriage, marriage is complicated, why she left is not really my business.. in fact the OP ddnt say...he just said she left for a while and came back after death....if she ddnt have kids for the man.. she can’t come back naaa.


Again ....u said I should Imagine a Woman that left and Abandoned a man for selfish reasons without any intention to get back to the man anymore ,Now she has no Children for the man only for her to rush back once she heard the man is Dead to lay Claims...

#What’s the essence of this imagination u asking me to do....that’s not condition the OP gave us.. it’s about someone that came back to lay claims cos she has kids...I don’t get u ooooo .......


Finally u said from the start of this comment that no one is saying she doesn’t have claim, which is what I’ve been sayin from my first comment

.....so I don’t really understand the context of this ur comment...I would really love to get you.

oyatz:



If this case goes to court, the #EndSARS promoters will lose out because court rules on credible evidence, beyond all reasonable doubts to convict anyone of murder.

Determinations of the exact number of people killed and their Identities are crucial to establishing that a massacre truly occurred at the Lekki Toll Gate.

1) How many people were killed?
2) Corpses and/or verifiable Names, Ages, addresses, last known addresses of those killed will be asked by the court of Law.

Evidence or no evidence....Does Nigeria look like a country where anyone can win the government......


all I asked u is one question...and u couldn’t answer??

tobechi74:


I agree with u . Spot on Does any of the man family know of the union?

If no, only a DNA test can be used as evidence in court

They are not denying he married their son or had children...they are saying she doesn’t have any claim becos she left for a while...

alizma:

Do you understand the policy or you just type without clear understanding? The government is protecting your interest and you call that wickedness, what type of human being are you?
The new policy is targeted at people that issue cheques knowing fully well that they don't have money in their account or that they will not be able to fund the account before the maturity of the cheque.
In developed countries, cheque is as good as cash because you dare not issue cheques against unfunded account but here in Nigeria, people see cheque as a professional way of rubbing business partners. They collect goods and give you cheque knowing fully well there is no money in the account. Now the bank is taking measure to prevent such unscrupulous behavior and the next thing you say is that the country is wicked......

u don’t know Nigerians banks......
They will put charges for your transaction alerts, card maintenance fee etc under Direct debits..


.that means banks will charge your more if u don’t have money when they are ready to debit....

oyatz:



The Lagos State NEVER claimed that two people died at the Lekki Toll Gate from gun shot injuries. Rather the Governor said that there were casualties but no single fatality.

The first guy died in the hospital from blunt trauma to the Head.

U people keep making excuse for the goverment

Since this issue started...have u not noticed foul play from this goverment ??...please be sincere.

From the fashola camera ..
To the camera that suddenly stoped working at the toll gate...
The army claimingnthey were not there
Later sayingn they came
To fashola inviting them
To fashola denying
To we only shot blank bullets
To we never shot at our fellow citizens

Does this not look like someone is hiding something.... ??
suddenly, lagos state hospital morgue is begging people to come look their person...ok oooo... I know u’ll have another excuse for the government

oyatz:


How do you compare Oranges with Banana?

Deaths due to COVID-19 out of the 200 Million Nigerians that are susceptible can be blamed on anybody and a relative can't sue anybody for his beloved relation to get Justice.
Despite that this is more or less a natural phenomenon, there are many known people e.g Sen Buruji Kashamu, Sen Pepper, Ex-Gov Ajimobi and the Late Abba Kyari who died of COVID-19 infection.


However, a murder case is completely different.
Scores of Families all over Nigeria have beseiged the various Judicial Panels of Inquiries on Police Brutality to demand Justice for their relatives killed by the Police without anyone harrassing them, why can't relatives of those killed at Lekki Toll Gate go to these Panels to establish their cases in ways that can stand Judicial Scrutiny.

Now it’s orange and banana bah??
Well these people kept saying they took the bodies of victims.....if u have a case of missing person, u can’t claim he was killed at lekki toll gate naaa....

Beckysexy:
Wizkid come and give me Yoruba lessons , I need it.

Wizkid be like ...baby mama 4.....come to zaddy

Where is lalasticlala seff...??

helinues:
He is a British for Christ sake... What's the meaning of ruling in majority Christian dominated area?

That's African mentality thinking

That’s the average Muslim mentality for you...

England isn’t even a christian state...o don’t know where he got Christian-dominated from

.u see that how they carry their terror attacks on innocent people becos they belive any place that isn’t ruled by sharia are full of Christian infidels...

x123xlolls:


that's what they cant understand.

those beheaders are really not muslims as their target are always muslims [/b]hence they destroyed all major islamic countries like iraq, syria, yemen, libya etc

[b]Their targets are always Muslims?? how do u people sleep at night??

The man/teacher that was beheaded in France is a Muslim...??
The teachers and others that was beheaded in northern Nigeria are Muslims?

The mutalab pant bomber entered a plane full of Muslims??
The September 11 terror attack was done in Saudi Arabia or UAE?

Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale hacked down Rigby a random British soldier and called themselves soldier of Allah in a court...was Rigby a Muslim?

Do u know how many beheading we have watched on live television of Israelis and Americans?

Oga......Go and have ur bath...hypocrisy is smelling all over your body...

pussyphilia:
I think what the op meant was a disciplinarian i.e a lady who can discipline him by beating or something. The carrot and stick kind of love.

U are still saying the same thing in a different way.., even children don’t want someone that will be beating them....
Why would any adult desire someone that can discipline him by beating him??

pussyphilia:
One thing I have realized in this life is that no gender was born to lead or exercise dominance over the other. Some societies just made it look like men are to lead.
@poster, you're not the only one with that preference. Many of your type are being suppressed by the closed minded Nigerian Society. In a free world, your type would find themselves the kind of ladies they desire. But in Nigeria, they pretend to be who they are not in order to be seen as "real men "

Did u even read what the guy said is wrong with him...??
Weda gay or heterosexual... no one should find violence attractive... it’s a problem rooted in psychological pain...
It’s a coping mechanism gone wrong.....

What’s the essence of this thread...??

To show that Christians are accommodating?? Or to show that the Muslim guy is a super man??
Cos really I don’t get..


See, there’s no Christian dominated country in the West....there’s no Christians state..only Muslims seek those kind of unaccomodating conditions where their religion and shariah rules...

England, like many western countries has liberal laws and that’s why he could use liberal system to become weteva he became....

can someone try this in Arab nations?? U can’t even be a citizen in Arab nation let alone be among their ruling class..

Karlifate:
Dis one na pigpopotamus o...

Nairalanders...u will not kill somebody with laugh