₦airaland Forum

lordnicklaus:
How come the Tel El Amarna tablets make mention of a wandering desert tribe known as "Habiru"?

A tribute that didn't even speak a common language? They were a group of people from different tribes who lived of the grid. Also, Egypt never kept them as slaves.

The Exodus never happened.

Universal laws are not decrees started by any authority but rather a description of how the universe behaves. The human mind finds patterns in these systems and then uses that to predict outcomes.

Joshthefirst:
you share 80% of your DNA with a cat. You share 99% of your DNA with the bonobo, an ape. Yet you are vastly different.

Dont be an idiot. The fact that you're made of the same components doesn't mean you're the same. Computer chips are made of sand.

Yes, yes, and 70% with the slug, etc.. Perfectly fits the narrative of common descent.

onetrack:
We are merely a species of ape, though by far the most successful reproductively and geographically, until climate change destroys us.

Climate change, food shortages, depletion of resources, super viruses, nuclear warfare, asteroid impact, etc.

Lennycool:
These facts don't surprise me. If nigeria were to lose its homophobia, and restriction against homosexuality. You would be amazed at the number of people that will identify as gay.

It's a running trend among homophobic people. That's why they get uncomfortable with physical contact and are quick to call people gay for the dumbest of reasons. They must hate themselves for being a way that they've been indoctrinated to think is wrong.

The hypocrisy is real.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/gay-porn-pakistan_n_3437529.html

http://heavy.com/news/2013/06/gay-porn-most-googled-searched-pakistan-nigeria/

blueAgent:
Give us some examples of experiments that proved bigbang and Evolution.

Evolution:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_evolution

Big Bang:
http://www.schoolsobservatory.org.uk/astro/cosmos/bb_evid

UyiIredia:
That's adaptation. It doesn't prove evolution in the slightest.

What happens when something adapts over 2 million years?

Ranchhoddas:
Nope. It is false to you simply because we both have different definitions of the word ''evidence''.

Objective evidence such as experiments, or fulfilled predictions.

Not subjective evidence like anecdotes. We can't build bridges or planes with principles based on anecdotes.

He just posts this stuff to jerk off to our comments. We should stop replying to sh*t like this while he spends his time prattling about atheists instead of healing amputees.

UyiIredia:
And how does that help your failed theory.

The parasite continues to evolve an immunity to various medicines. Penicillin and quinine are almost useless against it these days.

You can deny evidence; it won't change a thing.

winner01:
But I also disagree with such level of certainty regarding such matters.

You should. It is impossible.

winner01:
I dont know. Do you know the answer to everything?

No. So I don't argue against what I don't understand. There's no way two individuals can give rise to such genetic diversity with all that incest.

UyiIredia:
Evolution staring at me in the face. Please. Decieve yourself. Don't try to decieve me biko.

Next time you have malaria, just take penicillin.

DoctorAlien:
You're terribly funny. Satan simply entered the serpent. The serpent was not satan.

God knew Satan would lead man to sin but didn't stop him from entering the garden. Hence, giving man no chance.

DoctorAlien:
Brother, their eyes were opened does not mean that they didn't know from GOD's stern warnings that eating that fruit is a sin.

Their eyes were opened, and they began to see inadequacy and shamefulness in their unclothedness. They were naked before, and not ashamed. But when their eyes were opened, they became ashamed of their unclothedness.

They had no concept of sin. Someone told them something, someone told them something else. They tested to see who was correct. They didn't know they were doing evil.

DoctorAlien:
So what will make them sin if there is no avenue for them to sin?

Satan. Whom God put in the same garden as Adam and Eve, knowing what would happen.

DoctorAlien:
He knew that they would sin. What contradiction are you talking about?

If he knew that they would sin, there was no need for a test because they were doomed to fail.

DoctorAlien:
CoolUsername, please tell us how Adam and Eve had no sense of right or wrong.

The serpent said so.

Genesis 3:5
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

The bible clearly states that their eyes were indeed opened. They also realized their unclothedness, indicating a loss of childlike innocence.

Genesis 3:7
And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

DoctorAlien:
I'm laughing out loud now

GOD should not test man's loyalty because He knows everything? That doesn't add up. He did not create a robot. He created a being with freewill. Without testing man's loyalty, Satan could argue that man obeyed simply because there was no avenue for him to disobey.

What then do you think is going on in the world today? THE GREAT CONVERSY!

Satan challenged GOD. That is a short summary of the whole thing. However, he will be destroyed, together with sinners.

Then that means God didn't know whether Adam would sin or not so he isn't all knowing. That's what a contradiction is.

DoctorAlien:
You really have a distorted idea of GOD and the Bible.

This whole thing is a struggle between GOD and Satan. GOD cast Satan out for disobedience. GOD created man. If GOD had not put that tree there to test their loyalty, Satan would have said that man obeys GOD because there's nothing to make him sin. GOD put the tree there to test man's loyalty to Himself.

God should not need to test man's loyalty as he knows everything.

In fact, as long as the Devil isn't as powerful as God, there shouldn't be a struggle.

Ranchhoddas:
I hold an opinion. I believe that the supernatural is real. That's an opinion.

And your opinion has no bearing on fact, neither does mine. So the moment you failed to provide unambiguous evidence, your opinion became false.

DoctorAlien:
How did man have no control over his actions?

Say, I know everything that has ever and would ever happen, I know that if I create Adam and Eve the serpent would lead them to sin by eating a forbidden fruit. So what do I do? I create them anyway, put the servant in the same garden that I put them along with the tree that bears the forbidden fruit. I then instruct not to eat from it but neglect to give Adam and Eve a sense of right and wrong. I then proceed to punish them and ask their descendants to come.

I am, therefore:
1. really wicked, or
2. really stupid.

I didn't give man a chance to succeed the moment I put him in that garden.

felixomor:
U see urself. No wonder u av problem with the word.
It doesn't imply omnipotent.
And even omnipotent doesnt imply all-doing.
So go study

If I know everything them I know how to give myself the power to do anything.

But don't let us deviate from the topic, Ranchoddas was highlighting a MAJOR contradiction in your religion's doctrine. I was calling you out for attacking him instead of defending your point.

Ranchhoddas:
I ain't telling you to consider jack Sir. I know you won't.

No, I just feel that you indecision on this matter isn't based on rational thought. No offense. You hold no opinion and think that somehow makes you right.

Smallville10:
GOD knew they would sin.. So what do u wanna say next?

So why is he punishing ask their ancestors for something that they had no control over.

felixomor:
What is "omniscient"?
U r still running from the question

It means 'all knowing'. As in every single thing. It implies omnipotence too. It is obviously an irrational concept to me.

felixomor:
Why didnt u go and do what he did?

This is the typical atheist behavior that irks.
Someobody does something extraordinary, u wait for the person to finish it.
Then u sit down on the internet and start saying it happened by chance.

How much have u won in predicting strings of games?
Why dont u go n do it, if its easy.

Besides i can see u av switched to attacking octopus paul to make the matter long.
Alas, i can now see that we r far away from the original question of the scripture on David.
As usual.

Well, That was just an example.
There are other people who have also prophecied in the past and it came to pass.
So the question will still hold if u still consider the fulfilled prophecies of those other examples too.

Ad hominem. I love it. Your analogy doesn't stand because Octopus Paul was wrong a few times and therefore isn't omniscient. You say God is omniscient meaning that he knew the decision that David was going to make. Simple!

Ranchhoddas:
You did not see your great-great grandparents, but you are very sure they once lived and this certainty can be likened to the kind atheists have when it comes to evolution and the Big Bang.

Nah bro, evolution is a fact because we have seen experiments where it occurs.

The Big Bang is pretty compelling because a good number of predictions from the theory have been observed decades later.

winner01:
But We are not the ones who claim to believe only in things we see. We believe in the unseen.

Can atheists say the same for themselves?

How do so many races split from two people without evolution?

adjoviomole:
So basically na all of us dey on d same path, na d end we go tey know who dey tell d truth. Make we wait till den na. Abi?

Don't put him in the same category as people like you who won't read a book before coming online to disgrace his continent, race and religion.